Scribd
Upload
32 views1 page

fll-challenge-submerged-rubrics-rd

The document outlines the judging criteria for a Robot Design competition, focusing on five key areas: Identify, Design, Create, Iterate, and Communicate. Each criterion has a rubric with four levels of achievement, ranging from 'Beginning' to 'Exceeds', requiring judges to evaluate team performance and provide comments for those who exceed expectations. The criteria also emphasize the importance of teamwork, original design, testing, and effective communication of the learning process.

Uploaded by

Lukácsné Gabi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
32 views1 page

fll-challenge-submerged-rubrics-rd

The document outlines the judging criteria for a Robot Design competition, focusing on five key areas: Identify, Design, Create, Iterate, and Communicate. Each criterion has a rubric with four levels of achievement, ranging from 'Beginning' to 'Exceeds', requiring judges to evaluate team performance and provide comments for those who exceed expectations. The criteria also emphasize the importance of teamwork, original design, testing, and effective communication of the learning process.

Uploaded by

Lukácsné Gabi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Robot Design

Team # Team Name Judging Room

Instructions
Teams should communicate to the judges their achievement in each of the following criteria.
This rubric should be filled out according to the Robot Design explanation.

Judges are required to tick one box on each separate row to indicate the level the team has
achieved. If the team EXCEEDS, a short comment in the exceeds column is required.

BEGINNING DEVELOPING ACCOMPLISHED EXCEEDS


1 2 3 4
How has the team exceeded?

IDENTIFY – Team determined which missions to attempt, explored building and coding resources, and sought guidance as needed.

Minimal evidence of mission Partial evidence of mission Clear evidence of mission


strategy strategy strategy

Clear use of building or coding


Minimal use of building or Some use of building or coding
resources to support their
coding resources resources
mission strategy

DESIGN – Team members worked collaboratively on their designs and developed the building and coding skills needed.

Minimal evidence that all team Partial evidence that all team Clear evidence that all team
members contributed ideas members contributed ideas members contributed ideas

Minimal evidence of building Partial evidence of building Clear evidence of building


and coding skills in all team and coding skills in all team and coding skills in all team
members members members

CREATE – Team developed original designs or improved on existing ones according to their mission strategy.

Unclear explanation of Simple explanation of Clear explanation of innovative


attachments and their purpose attachments and their purpose attachments and their purpose

Unclear explanation of code Simple explanation of code Clear explanation of innovative


and/or sensor use and/or sensor use code and/or sensor use

ITERATE – Team repeatedly tested their robot and code to identify areas for improvement and incorporated the findings into their solutions.

Minimal evidence of testing Partial evidence of testing their Clear evidence of repeated
their robot and code robot and code testing of their robot and code
Minimal evidence of Partial evidence of
Clear evidence of
improvements based on improvements based on
improvements based on testing
testing testing

COMMUNICATE – Team effectively explained what they learned from the robot design process and celebrated their progress.

Unclear explanation of Simple explanation of process Detailed explanation of process


process and lessons learned and lessons learned and lessons learned

Team shows minimal pride or Team shows partial pride or Team clearly shows pride or
enthusiasm for their work enthusiasm for their work enthusiasm for their work

Criteria on this page with this style of check box count dually
toward Robot Design and Core Values awards rankings

You might also like