Samuoliene Et Al. - 2013 - LED Illumination Affects Bioactive Compounds in Romaine Baby Leaf Lettuce
Samuoliene Et Al. - 2013 - LED Illumination Affects Bioactive Compounds in Romaine Baby Leaf Lettuce
Received: 15 October 2012 Revised: 29 March 2013 Accepted article published: 12 April 2013 Published online in Wiley Online Library: 15 May 2013
using light-emitting diodes (LEDs) represents a fundamentally Forestry, Kaunas Str. 30, LT-54333, Babtai, Kaunas, Lithuania
leaves with serrated leaf margins, was grown to harvest time (22 The PPFD generated by each lighting unit was measured at the
days) in (I) a phytotron and (II, III) a greenhouse. Lettuces were top of the plant using a photometer/radiometer (RF-100, Sonopan,
sown and grown in peat substrate (pH 5–6; N 70, P 40, K 160, Poland). The PPFD was periodically adjusted to maintain the same
Ca 250, Mg 50 mg L−1 ) in 28-cell plastic plug trays (cell volume light level during the growth period at the top of the plant.
120 mL) at five seeds per cell. After germination, seedlings were
thinned out to leave three plants per cell. Trays were equally Sampling
distributed to act as three experimental replications for each At 22 days after seeding, lettuces from the central part of
lighting treatment. Day/night temperatures were 20 ± 2/16 ± 2 the illuminated area were harvested, excluding marginal plants
◦
C and relative air humidity was 50–60% in all treatments. Plants because of possible side effects. Conjugated biological samples
were watered when needed and fertilised with 2 g L−1 ammonium of the green matter of five randomly selected plants from
nitrate solution once a week. each treatment were used for analysis. Three replications were
(I) Lighting experiments were performed in growth chambers performed for each phytochemical measurement. All data are
under controlled environmental conditions, with natural expressed on a fresh weight (FW) basis.
illumination eliminated. The experiments started from sowing
time and lasted for 22 days until harvesting. Originally designed7 Determination of total phenolic compounds
LED-based lighting units consisting of commercially available The total content of phenolic compounds was determined
wavelengths were used: basal red (LXHL-LR3C, λ = 638 ± 23 nm in lettuce leaf 800 g L−1 methanol (POCH, Gliwice, Poland)
and L670-66-60, λ = 670 ± 23 nm; Philips Lumileds Lighting extracts (1:10 w/v) using a calorimetric Folin–Ciocalteu method.11
Company, San Jose, CA, USA), blue (Luxeon LXHL-LRC, λ = 455 ± 23 The absorbance at 765 nm was measured with a Genesys 6
nm; Philips Lumileds Lighting Company) and far-red (L735-05-AU, spectrophotometer (Thermo Spectronic, Rochester, NY, USA)
λ = 735 ± 25 nm; Epitex, Kyoto, Japan) and supplemental UV against water as a blank. Total phenolics were quantified by a
(NCCU001E, λ = 380 ± 15 nm; Nichia, Tokyo, Japan), green (LXHL- calibration method using gallic acid as a standard.
MM1D, λ = 510 ± 37 nm; Philips Lumileds Lighting Company),
yellow (LXHL-MLAC, λ = 595 ± 17 nm; Philips Lumileds Lighting 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free
Company) and orange (LXHL-MHAC, λ = 622 ± 20nm; Philips radical-scavenging activity
Lumileds Lighting Company) LEDs. A combination of blue 455 The antioxidant activity of lettuce leaf 800 g L−1 methanol
nm (8 µmol m−2 s−1 ), red 638 nm (150 µmol m−2 s−1 ), red 670 extracts (1:10 w/v) was evaluated spectrophotometrically as the
nm (12 µmol m−2 s−1 ) and far-red 735 nm (4 µmol m−2 s−1 ) light DPPH (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) free radical (DPPH• )-
was used as the basal illumination spectrum. Other treatments scavenging ability (µmol g−1 ).11 A Genesys 6 spectrophotometer
were supplemented with UV 380 nm (4 µmol m−2 s−1 ; basal + UV), (Thermo Spectronic) was used for the analysis. The absorbance at
green 520 nm (12 µmol m−2 s−1 ; basal + G), yellow 595 nm (10 515 nm was measured after 16 min.
µmol m−2 s−1 ; basal + Y) or orange 622 nm (28 µmol m−2 s−1 ;
basal + O) LED wavelengths. In all treatments a photoperiod of 16 Determination of ascorbic acid
h was used and a total photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) Ascorbic acid (Penta, Prague, Czech republic) content was
of about 175 µmol m−2 s−1 was maintained by adjusting the flux determined using a spectrophotometric method12 based on
of red 638 nm LEDs. methyl viologen (Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) reduction. A
(II, III) Plants were grown in a VD-Block-type greenhouse (Danish Genesys 6 spectrophotometer (Thermo Spectronic) was used for
Greenhouse Supply A/S, Tommerup, Denmark) in Lithuania the analysis. The coloured radical ion was measured at 600 nm and
(latitude 55◦ N) in November. Natural illumination (daily average ascorbic acid contents were quantified using a calibration method.
of 20–80 µmol m−2 s−1 ) was supplemented with standard HPS
lamps (SON-T Agro, 400 W; Philips, Somerset, NJ, USA) (PPFD of Determination of total anthocyanins
∼90 µmol m−2 s−1 ) and LED (II and III) lighting with a photoperiod The total amount of anthocyanins was determined using a
of 16 h. spectrophotometric pH-differential method.13 The absorption
(II) Four sets of solid state lamps for supplemental lighting in the values at 420, 520 and 700 nm were measured. Anthocyanins
greenhouse were designed using high-power blue 455 ± 23 nm were expressed as mg cyanidin 3-glucoside equivalent g−1 FW,
(LXHL-LR3C) or 470 ± 25 nm (LXHL-LB3C) or green 505 ± 30 nm using a molar extinction coefficient of 25 740 L mol−1 cm−1 and a
(LXHL-LE3C) or 530 ± 38 nm (LXHL-LM3C) AlInGaN LEDs (Luxeon molecular weight of 485 g mol−1 .
III series, 3 W; Philips Lumileds Lighting Company) that generated
a PPFD of 30 µmol m−2 s−1 . Plants were illuminated with LEDs and Determination of tocopherols
HPS lamps from sowing time until harvesting (22 days). Reference The contents of α- and γ -tocopherol (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA,
plants were grown under HPS lighting (PPFD increased to ∼115 USA) in lettuce leaf/hexane (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) extracts
µmol m−2 s−1 ). (1:10 w/v) were determined using a high-performance liquid chro-
(III) Lettuces were grown under daylight with supplemental matography (HPLC) method. Samples were centrifuged (349 × g,
HPS lighting (90 µmol m−2 s−1 , 16 h) from sowing time. At 3 days 5 min) and filtered through a 0.45 µm polytetrafluoroethylene
before harvest (vegetative development stage), supplemental (PTFE) syringe filter (VWR International, Radnor, PA, USA). An HPLC
red LED illumination (16 h photoperiod) was added. The solid 10A system equipped with an RF-10A fluorescence detector (Shi-
state illuminator10 contained red AlGaInP LEDs (Luxeon III Star madzu, Kyoto, Japan) and a Pinacle II silica column (5 µm particle
model LXHL-LD3C, Philips Lumileds Lighting Company) with a size, 150 mm × 4.6 mm; Restec, Bellefonte, PA, USA) were used for
peak wavelength of 638 ± 23 nm. The PPFD generated by the the analysis. The mobile phase was 5 g L−1 isopropanol (Merck) in
LEDs was 210 µmol m−2 s−1 . Reference plants were grown under hexane at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1 . The peak was detected using
HPS lighting (PPFD increased to ∼300 µmol m−2 s−1 ) during the an excitation wavelength of 295 nm and an emission wavelength
3287
HPS lighting alone (Table 2). Supplemental blue 455 nm light range of plants following UV exposure.22 An increase in phenolic
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jsfa
c 2013 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2013; 93: 3286–3291
Lettuce phytochemicals depend on light quality www.soci.org
Table 1. Effect of LED light quality on phytochemicals in baby leaf lettuce grown in growth chambers
Phenols (mg g−1 ) 1.44 ± 0.05 2.32 ± 0.08∗ 1.52 ± 0.03 1.59 ± 0.16 2.64 ± 0.04∗
DPPH• (µmol g−1 ) 10.02 ± 0.19 9.44 ± 0.66 8.97 ± 0.93 9.27 ± 0.30 9.64 ± 0.19
Anthocyanins (mg g−1 ) 84.98 ± 5.97 75.19 ± 4.63 104.15 ± 7.55∗ 77.95 ± 3.23 51.92 ± 5.22∗
Ascorbic acid (mg g−1 ) 0.35 ± 0.03 0.30 ± 0.00∗ 0.33 ± 0.04 0.29 ± 0.01∗ 0.32 ± 0.01
α-Tocopherol (µg g−1 ) 0.86 ± 0.01 0.31 ± 0.00∗ 0.59 ± 0.01∗ 0.37 ± 0.01∗ 0.40 ± 0.01∗
γ -Tocopherol (µg g−1 ) 8.54 ± 0.16 7.30 ± 0.08∗ 8.05 ± 0.18∗ 8.12 ± 0.13∗ 7.33 ± 0.10∗
β-Carotene (µg g−1 ) 2.17 ± 0.31 1.86 ± 0.49 1.86 ± 0.43 2.78 ± 0.38 1.72 ± 0.51
α-Carotene (µg g−1 ) 0.22 ± 0.03 1.35 ± 0.06∗ 0.36 ± 0.02∗ 0.24 ± 0.12 0.24 ± 0.04
Basal, 455, 638, 670 and 735 nm; UV, 380 nm; G (green), 520 nm; Y (yellow), 595 nm; O (orange), 622 nm.
∗ Significantly (P ≤ 0.05) different from basal value.
Table 2. Effect of supplemental blue (455, 470 nm) and green (505, 530 nm) LED light on phytochemicals in baby leaf lettuce grown in a greenhouse
under HPS lighting
Phytochemical HPS HPS + 455 nm HPS + 470 nm HPS + 505 nm HPS + 530 nm
Phenols (mg g−1 ) 1.00 ± 0.04 0.61 ± 0.03∗ 0.58 ± 0.03∗ 0.87 ± 0.03∗ 0.71 ± 0.03∗
DPPH• (µmol g−1 ) 9.95 ± 0.09 9.71 ± 0.09∗ 8.32 ± 0.05∗ 9.97 ± 0.09 10.91 ± 0.08∗
Anthocyanins (mg g−1 ) 57.64 ± 7.66 53.17 ± 3.17 62.94 ± 2.94 54.17 ± 4.31 80.09 ± 3.05∗
Ascorbic acid (mg g−1 ) 0.26 ± 0.00 0.21 ± 0.01∗ 0.40 ± 0.02∗ 0.28 ± 0.02 0.26 ± 0.00
α-Tocopherol (µg g−1 ) 1.70 ± 0.07 2.4 ± 0.08∗ 1.61 ± 0.01 1.57 ± 0.02∗ 1.59 ± 0.01∗
γ -Tocopherol (µg g−1 ) 8.06 ± 0.24 9.12 ± 0.18∗ 6.54 ± 0.14∗ 7.89 ± 0.07 7.17 ± 0.13∗
β-Carotene (µg g−1 ) 0.28 ± 0.04 0.20 ± 0.01∗ 0.09 ± 0.01∗ 0.23 ± 0.03 0.22 ± 0.02∗
α-Carotene (µg g−1 ) 2.16 ± 0.06 1.24 ± 0.02∗ 0.67 ± 0.02∗ 2.88 ± 0.27∗ 1.19 ± 0.04∗
∗
Significantly (P ≤ 0.05) different from HPS value at same PPFD level.
fluorescent or HPS illumination in greenhouses. However, by metabolism of antioxidants in lettuce was dependent on multiple
Table 4. Correlation (r) between phytochemicals in lettuce leaves exposed to different light qualitites
Phenols DPPH• 0.98 1.00 1.00∗ 0.66 0.94 0.98 0.98 0.83 0.98 0.77 1.00∗
Anthocyanins 1.00∗ 0.96 1.00 0.96 −0.96 0.99 1.00∗ 0.98 0.99 0.94 0.97
Ascorbic acid 0.90 0.99 1.00∗ 0.94 0.99 0.99 0.94 0.98 0.80 0.64 0.79
Tocopherols 0.75 0.91 0.77 0.68 0.90 0.93 0.94 0.81 0.81 0.71 0.84
Carotenes 1.00∗ 0.98 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.87 1.00∗ 0.97 0.89
DPPH• Anthocyanins 0.98 0.92 0.99 0.84 −0.82 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.98
Ascorbic acid 0.97 0.96 1.00∗ 0.87 0.89 0.95 0.86 0.91 0.90 0.99 0.81
Tocopherols 0.86 0.94 0.73 1.00∗ 0.99 0.85 0.99 1.00∗ 0.91 1.00∗ 0.87
Carotenes 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.86 0.98 1.00 1.00∗ 1.00 0.96 0.89 0.91
Anthocyanins Ascorbic acid 0.90 0.99 0.99 1.00∗ −0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.92
Tocopherols 0.74 0.75 0.82 0.85 −0.75 0.97 0.92 0.90 0.87 0.91 0.95
Carotenes 1.00∗ 0.89 1.00∗ 1.00∗ −0.92 0.97 0.98 0.95 0.98 0.99 0.98
Ascorbic acid Tocopherols 0.96 0.82 0.72 0.88 0.84 0.97 0.78 0.90 1.00∗ 1.00 0.99
Carotenes 0.87 0.94 0.98 1.00∗ 0.97 0.97 0.89 0.95 0.76 0.80 0.98
Tocopherols Carotenes 0.71 0.97 0.85 0.88 0.95 0.90 0.97 0.99 0.77 0.86 1.00
Basal, 455, 638, 670 and 735 nm; UV, 380 nm; G (green), 520 nm; Y (yellow), 595 nm; O (orange), 622 nm; HPS, high-pressure sodium lighting.
∗ P ≤ 0.05.
factors such as variety, light quality and season. Our present results Niki and Noguchi36 state that individual antioxidant compounds
showed that the obtained increase in some compounds did not act in combination with other antioxidants, as interactions among
compensate the decrease in other tested phytochemical contents them can affect total antioxidant capacity, producing synergistic
in romaine baby leaf lettuce (Table 2). This effect might be related or antagonistic effects. In our study the DPPH• -scavenging activity
to the dosage of blue3 and green30 light, as a positive response of was highly correlated with the contents of tested phytochemicals
phytochemicals was achieved when these spectral components (Table 4). In agreement with other authors,37 the linear correlation
accounted for up to 50% of the total photon flux density. between phenolics and DPPH• -scavenging ability suggests that
Another idea to incorporate LED lighting for improving the presence of phenolic compounds largely accounts for the
the nutritional quality of green vegetables without requiring antioxidant capacity. Hashempour et al.38 found that antioxidant
investment to install LEDs in large greenhouse areas was short- capacity was highly correlated with total anthocyanin and total
term preharvest treatment. A high flux of red 640 nm LED light phenolic contents, whereas the linear correlation between total
applied for 3–7 days before harvesting in controlled environment antioxidant capacity and ascorbic acid was moderate. However,
chambers27 or greenhouses, possibly acting as a photostressor, according to the present results, different light spectral quality
alters both the concentrations of individual phytochemicals
evoked an antioxidant system response and enhanced the
and the correlative interactions between them, indicating that
contents of lutein and glucosinolate sinigrin in red leaf cabbage27
different light colours initiate different light perception and
and phenolic compounds, ascorbic acid and α-tocopehrol in
signalling mechanisms.
lettuce31 and other green vegetables.32 Our previous results33
obtained from experiments with different red, green and light
green leaf curly lettuce varieties irradiated with supplemental 638
nm LED light in a greenhouse resulted in increases in total phenolic
CONCLUSIONS
Lighting wavelength control using LED technology can affect
compound content and free radical-scavenging activity in red
the production of secondary metabolites, as the synthesis or
and light green leaf lettuce. However, green leaf lettuce showed
absorption of many nutrients is light-dependent. Our results
statistically unreliable changes in vitamin C, total anthocyanins
showed the following. (I) Blue, red and far-red LEDs (basal)
and free radical-scavenging activity. Similar data were obtained
are suitable for romaine baby leaf lettuce cultivation, leading
in the present study with romaine green leaf lettuce, where
to the accumulation of appropriate levels of phenols, ascorbic
short-term high-PPFD red LEDs had no significant effect on total acid, anthocyanins, carotenes and tocopherols. Supplemental UV
phenol, total anthocyanin and ascorbic acid accumulation or light (basal + UV) enhanced phenolic compounds and α-carotene,
DPPH• -scavenging activity (Table 3). It is known that the red light supplemental green light (basal + G) enhanced α-carotene
signalling pathway is related to phytochrome transformation1 and anthocyanins, and supplemental orange light (basal + O)
and there is evidence suggesting that phenolic compound34 enhanced phenolic compounds. However, all supplemental LED
and anthocyanin35 synthesis is regulated by phytochromes. Also, colours had a negative effect on tocopherol and ascorbic acid
lighting conditions might evoke photo-oxidative changes in levels. (II) HPS lighting supplemented with blue, cyan or green
plants that lead to changed contents and activity of secondary LEDs in the greenhouse was not efficient, as the increase in
metabolites even if they do not participate in reactions directly some compounds did not compensate the decrease in major
3290
receptive to the light stimulus. tested phytochemicals. Supplemental green 530 nm light had the
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jsfa
c 2013 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2013; 93: 3286–3291
Lettuce phytochemicals depend on light quality www.soci.org
most pronounced effect on lettuce leaf extract DPPH• -scavenging 18 Brazaitytė A, Ulinskaitė R, Duchovskis P, Samuolienė G, Šikšnianienė
ability, mainly owing to the increased anthocyanin content. (III) JB, Jankauskienė J, et al., Optimization of lighting spectrum for
Short-term irradiation with supplemental red 638 nm LEDs before photosynthetic system and productivity of lettuce by using light-
emitting diodes. Acta Hort 711:183–188 (2006).
harvesting in the greenhouse did not have a significant effect on 19 Franklin KA and Whitelam GC, Light signals, phytochromes and cross-
phytochemical contents, apart from enhancing tocopherols. talk with other environmental cues. J Exp Bot 55:271–276 (2004).
The results demonstrated that the levels of selected 20 Kim HH, Goins GD, Wheeler RM and Sager JC, Green-light
phytochemicals in lettuce plants may be purposefully altered supplementation for enhanced lettuce growth under red- and
by irradiating plants with optimised lighting spectra or creating blue-light-emitting diodes. HortScience 39:1617–1622 (2004).
21 Johkan M, Shoji K, Goto F, Hahida S and Yoshihara T, Effect of
mild photostress. However, the mechanisms of the changes in green light wavelength and intensity on photomorphogenesis and
phytochemical contents under different light quality are not well photosynthesis in Lactuca sativa. J Environ Exp Bot 75:128–133
known yet. Moreover, the narrow-bandwidth supplemental light (2012).
effects were diminished by broader-spectrum HPS light or natural 22 Jansen MAK, Hectors K, O’Brien NM, Guisez Y and Potters G, Plant
stress and human health: do human consumers benefit from UV-B
daylight in the greenhouse. acclimated crops? Plant Sci 175:449–458 (2008).
23 Lee NY, Lee MJ, Kim YK, Park JC, Park HK, Choi JS, et al., Effect of light
emitting diode radiation on antioxidant activity of barley leaf. J Kor
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Soc Appl Biol Chem 53:658–690 (2010).
This work was supported by the framework of the programme 24 Tsormpatsidis E, Henbest RGC, Battey NH and Hadley P, The influence
of ultraviolet radiation on growth, photosynthesis and phenolic
‘Horticulture: agro-biological basis and technologies’. levels of green and red lettuce: potential for exploiting effects of
ultraviolet light in a production system. Ann Appl Biol 156:357–366
(2010).
REFERENCES 25 Ordidge M, Garcia-Macias P, Battey NH, Gordon MH, Hadley P, John
1 Carvalho LC, Santos S, Vilela BJ and Amâncio S, Solanum lycopersicon P, et al., Phenolic contents of lettuce, strawberry, raspberry and
Mill. and Nicotiana benthamiana L. under high light show distinct blueberry crops cultivated under plastic films varying in ultraviolet
responses to anti-oxidative stress.J Plant Physiol 165:1300–1312 transparency. Food Chem 119:1224–1227 (2010).
(2008). 26 Li H, Tang C, Xu Z, Liu X and Han X, Effects of different light sources on
2 Spaargaren JJ, Supplemental Lighting for Greenhouse Crops. P.L. Light the growth of non-heading Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris
Systems, Beamsville, Ontario, Canada, 178 pp. (2001). L.). J Agric Sci 4:262–273 (2012).
3 Hogewoning SW, Trouwborst G, Maljaars H, Pooter H, van Ieperen W 27 Lefsrud MG, Kopsell DA and Sams CE, Irradiance from distinct
and Harbinson J, Blue light dose-responses of leaf photosynthesis, wavelength light-emitting diodes affects secondary metabolites
morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown in kale. HortScience 43:2243–2244 (2008).
under different combinations of red and blue light. J Exp Bot 28 Pinho P, Lukkala R, Särkka L, Teti E, Tahovnen R and Halonen
61:3107–3117 (2010). L, Evaluation of lettuce growth under multi-spectral-component
4 Zhang T, Maruhnich SA and Folta KM, Green light induces shade supplemental solid state lighting in greenhouse environment. Int
avoidance symptoms. Plant Physiol 157:1528–1536 (2011). Rev Electr Eng I 2:854–680 (2007).
5 Li Q and Kubota C, Effects of supplemental light quality on growth 29 Samuolienė G, Sirtautas R, Brazaitytė A and Duchovskis P, LED lighting
and phytochemicals of baby leaf lettuce. Environ Exp Bot 67:59–64 and seasonality effects antioxidant properties of baby leaf lettuce.
(2009). Food Chem 134:1494–1499 (2012).
6 Pinho P, Jokinen K and Halonen L, Horticultural lighting – present and 30 Folta KM and Maruhnich SA, Green light: a signal to slow down or stop.
future challenges. Lighting Res Technol 44:427–437 (2012). J Exp Bot 58:3099–3111 (2007).
7 Tamulaitis G, Duchovskis P, Bliznikas Z, Breive K, Ulinskaite R, Brazaityte 31 Zukauskas A, Bliznikas Z, Breivė K, Novičkovas A, Samuolienė G,
A, et al., High-power light-emitting diode based facility for plant Urbonavičiūtė A, et al., Effect of supplementary pre-harvest LED
cultivation. J Phys D: Appl Phys 38:3182–3187 (2005). lighting on the antioxidant properties of lettuce cultivars. Acta Hort
8 Morrow RC, LED lighting in horticulture. HortScience 43:1947–1950 907:87–90 (2011).
(2008). 32 Bliznikas Z, Zukauskas A, Samuolienė G, Viršilė A, Brazaitytė A,
9 Hogewoning SW, Trouwborst G, Engbergs GJ, Harbinson J, van Ieperen Jankauskienė J, et al., Effect of supplementary pre-harvest LED
W, Ruijsch J, et al., Plant physiological acclimation to irradiation by lighting on the antioxidant and nutritional properties of green
light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Acta Hort 761:183–192 (2007). vegetables. Acta Hort 939:85–91 (2012).
10 Bliznikas Z, Breivė K, Novičkovas A, Vitta P, Žukauskas A and Duchovskis 33 Samuolienė G, Brazaitytė A, Sirtautas R, Novičkovas A and Duchovskis P,
P, Solid-state lamp for the improvement of nutritional quality of leafy Supplementary red-LED lighting affects phytochemicals and nitrates
vegetables. Electron Electr Eng 8:47–50 (2009). of baby leaf lettuce. J Food Agric Environ 9:271–274 (2011).
11 Ragaee S, Abdel-Aal EM and Maher N, Antioxidant activity and nutrient 34 Galuszka P, Frébortová J, Luhová L, Bilyeu KD, English JT and Frébort
composition of selected cereals for food use. Food Chem 95:32–38 I, Tissue localization of cytokinin dehydrogenase in maize: possible
(2006). involvement of quinone species generated from plant phenolics by
12 Janghel EK, Gupta VK, Rai MK and Rai JK, Micro determination of other enzymatic systems in the catalytic reaction. Plant Cell Physiol
ascorbic acid using methyl viologen. Talanta 72:1013–1016 (2007). 46:716–728 (2005).
13 Stanciu G, Lupşor S and Sava C, Spectrophotometric characterizations 35 Ramalho JC, Marques NC, Semedo JN, Matos MC and Quartin VL,
of anthocyans extracted from black grapes skin. Ovidijus Univ Ann Photosynthetic performance and pigment composition of leaves
Chem 20:205–208 (2009). from two tropical species is determined by light quality. Plant Biol
14 Yorio NC, Goins GD, Kagie HR, Wheeler RM and Sager JC, Improving 4:112–120 (2002).
spinach, radish and lettuce growth under red light-emitting diodes 36 Niki E and Noguchi N, Evaluation of antioxidant capacity. What capacity
(LEDs) with blue light supplementation. HortScience 36:380–383 is being measured by which method? IUBMB Life 50:323–329 (2000).
(2001). 37 Ehala S, Vaher M and Kaljurand M, Characterization of phenolic
15 Stutte GW, Edney S and Skerritt T, Photoregulation of bioprotectant profiles of northern European berries by capillary electrophoresis
content of red leaf lettuce with light-emitting diodes. HortScience and determination of their antioxidant activity. J Agric Food Chem
44:79–82 (2009). 53:6484–6490 (2005).
16 Johkan M, Shoji K, Goto F, Hahida S and Yoshihara T, Blue light- 38 Hashempour A, Ghazvini RF, Bakhshi D, Ghasemnezhad M, Sharafti
emitting diode light irradiation of seedlings improves seedling M and Ahmadian H, Ascorbic acid, anthocyanins, and phenolics
quality and growth after transplanting in red leaf lettuce. HortScience contents and antioxidant activity of ber, azarole, raspberry, and
45:1809–1814 (2010). cornelian cherry fruit genotypes growing in Iran. Hort Environ
17 Kubota C, Chia P, Yang Z and Li Q, Applications of far-red light emitting Biotechnol 51:83–88 (2010).
diodes in plant production under controlled environments. Acta
3291