Build Location Apps on iOS with Swift: Use Apple Maps, Google Maps, and Mapbox to Code Location Aware Mobile Apps Jeffrey Linwood download
Build Location Apps on iOS with Swift: Use Apple Maps, Google Maps, and Mapbox to Code Location Aware Mobile Apps Jeffrey Linwood download
https://textbookfull.com/product/build-location-apps-on-ios-with-
swift-use-apple-maps-google-maps-and-mapbox-to-code-location-
aware-mobile-apps-jeffrey-linwood/
https://textbookfull.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-
loucas/
https://textbookfull.com/product/ios-10-sdk-development-creating-
iphone-and-ipad-apps-with-swift-chris-adamson/
https://textbookfull.com/product/developing-inclusive-mobile-
apps-building-accessible-apps-for-ios-and-android-1st-edition-
rob-whitaker/
Learning Swift Building Apps for OSX, iOS, and Beyond
Jon Manning
https://textbookfull.com/product/learning-swift-building-apps-
for-osx-ios-and-beyond-jon-manning/
https://textbookfull.com/product/ios-11-swift-programming-
cookbook-solutions-and-examples-for-ios-apps-1st-edition-vandad-
nahavandipoor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/build-mobile-apps-with-
ionic-2-and-firebase-hybrid-mobile-app-development-1st-edition-
fu-cheng/
https://textbookfull.com/product/build-mobile-apps-with-
ionic-4-and-firebase-hybrid-mobile-app-development-lingua-
inglese-2nd-edition-fu-cheng/
https://textbookfull.com/product/swift-4-for-absolute-beginners-
develop-apps-for-ios-4th-edition-stefan-kaczmarek/
Build Location
Apps on iOS
with Swift
Use Apple Maps, Google Maps, and
Mapbox to Code Location Aware
Mobile Apps
—
Jeffrey Linwood
Build Location Apps
on iOS with Swift
Use Apple Maps, Google Maps,
and Mapbox to Code Location
Aware Mobile Apps
Jeffrey Linwood
Build Location Apps on iOS with Swift: Use Apple Maps, Google Maps, and
Mapbox to Code Location Aware Mobile Apps
Jeffrey Linwood
Austin, TX, USA
iii
Table of Contents
iv
Table of Contents
v
Table of Contents
vi
Table of Contents
vii
Table of Contents
Index�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������249
viii
About the Author
Jeffrey Linwood is an experienced software developer who has worked
on many iOS and Android apps that use maps or location functionality.
He’s also taught and mentored college student application teams as they
develop their first iOS apps. While teaching, he noticed a lack of good
sample applications and tutorials for map and location applications. Jeff
also enjoys running, hiking, and spending time with his wife, Clover, in
Austin, Texas. You can follow Jeff on Twitter at @jefflinwood, or on his
blog, https://www.jefflinwood.com.
ix
About the Technical Reviewer
Felipe Laso is a Senior Systems Engineer working at Lextech Global
Services. He’s also an aspiring game designer/programmer. You can follow
him on Twitter at @iFeliLM or on his blog.
xi
CHAPTER 1
G
etting started
The first step is to make sure that you have a recent version of Xcode (at
the time of writing, Xcode 11) installed on your Mac. If you’re using earlier
versions of Xcode, this code may not compile, and you may not be able to
follow directions. Xcode is free and may be downloaded from the Mac App
Store or from Apple’s developer portal.
We’ll also be using the Swift programming language, instead of Apple’s
older programming language for iOS, Objective-C. Almost all of this book
would be directly applicable to an Objective-C application. The underlying
application programming interfaces (APIs) used in iOS are generally the
same.
The Swift language has been evolving since its first release. This book
uses Swift 5, which is supported in Xcode 10 and above.
Click the Next button, and then name your new project on
the options dialog, as seen in Figure 1-2. I’m going to call the new
application FirstMapsApp and give it an organization identifier of com.
buildingmobileapps.maps and use my name for the Organization Name.
Be sure to choose Swift as the Language.
For this project, we will not be using SwiftUI – we will be using UIKit as
the application framework. Leave the SwiftUI check box unchecked.
We do not need to include Core Data in our project – Core Data is an
Apple technology used for storing data locally on iOS, and we won’t need it
for this example. We won’t be using Core Data in this book.
You can also uncheck Include Unit Tests and Include UI Tests, as we
won’t be setting up any tests for this project.
2
Chapter 1 Creating Your First MapKit App
Click Next, and save the project in a convenient location. You can
create a Git repository for your code if you want, but we won’t be directly
addressing source control in this book. It’s always a good idea to keep up
with Git commits as your project goes along, so that you can easily roll
back to a working copy.
After saving your project, Xcode will open your project and present an
overview of your application (Figure 1-3).
3
Chapter 1 Creating Your First MapKit App
You should now have a working Xcode project – go ahead and run it in
one of the iOS Simulators, for instance, the iPhone XR (Figure 1-4).
4
Chapter 1 Creating Your First MapKit App
You should expect to see a blank screen, as we have not written any
code for our application yet. If you do, your development environment is
set up and ready to go for the rest of this chapter.
Adding a map
Now it’s time to add a map to our view controller. Select the storyboard
on the left-hand side; it is the file named Main.storyboard. Once the
storyboard opens, select the View Controller Scene.
5
Chapter 1 Creating Your First MapKit App
In the upper right-hand corner of your Xcode window, choose the left-
most button (the Object library), which is the button with the plus sign in
the previous figure, as shown in Figure 1-5.
Either type Map into the search box underneath the list or scroll down
until you find the Map Kit View. Once you have found the Map Kit View,
drag it onto your view controller (Figure 1-6).
6
Chapter 1 Creating Your First MapKit App
The map view won’t automatically expand to fill the whole screen, so
you will need to do that yourself by dragging the edges of the map view to
fill the extent of the view. In Figure 1-7, you can see how the map view fills
the entire view controller on an iPhone XR device with a notch at the top.
7
Chapter 1 Creating Your First MapKit App
Even though we dragged the edges of the map view out to the edges of
the view controller’s view, that doesn’t mean that the map view will use the
entire screen on all sizes of the iPhone and iPad. To make the map view fill
the view controller’s view (also known as its parent view), we will need to
add constraints to the map view.
On the right-hand side of the toolbar underneath your view controller,
you will see five icons – the first icon is usually grayed out. The third icon
(Add New Constraints) opens up the Add New Constraints dialog box,
which we can use for our layouts.
Uncheck the “Constrain to margins” check box, as we are going to fill
the entire view with the map, not leaving any margins. Go ahead and select
the faint dashed red line for all four constraints (top, bottom, left, and
right). After selecting them, make sure that all of the values are 0, and press
the “Add 4 Constraints” button (Figure 1-8).
8
Chapter 1 Creating Your First MapKit App
Your map view will now properly fill up the entire screen on an iPhone
or iPad. If you would like to double-check this, select the Map View on
the storyboard. Next, choose the fifth icon on the right-hand side, the Size
Inspector, and you will see that you have constraints for all four sides of
your Map View.
Now try running your iOS app, and you will see that you have a nice,
large map on your app – as seen in Figure 1-9.
9
Chapter 1 Creating Your First MapKit App
10
Chapter 1 Creating Your First MapKit App
Select the map view on the storyboard or on the outline view, hold
down the Control key, and then drag an outlet into the ViewController
class, as shown in Figure 1-11.
11
Chapter 1 Creating Your First MapKit App
After creating the outlet, name the outlet mapView in the dialog box that
appears (Figure 1-12).
12
Chapter 1 Creating Your First MapKit App
can use classes from the MapKit framework. Otherwise, Xcode will show
errors when we try and build our project.
Add the following line right below the import UIKit statement to
import the MapKit framework.
import MapKit
13
Chapter 1 Creating Your First MapKit App
Pass in the latitude and the longitude (as double values) to create the
coordinate. The MKPointAnnotation will need this coordinate set, such as
in the following code:
austin.title = "Austin"
And then after setting the title and coordinate properties, we can call
one method on the map view to add the annotation
mapView.addAnnotation(austin)
Run this class (Listing 1-1), and you will see the iPhone app displaying
the Austin pin, after you scroll the map to show Texas on your Simulator.
Go ahead and change the pin to your city or to any other location you
want. Add more pins for different locations!
Listing 1-1. The ViewController class with a pin that displays on the
Map view
import UIKit
import MapKit
14
Chapter 1 Creating Your First MapKit App
Figure 1-13 shows the iPhone app with the Austin pin.
Figure 1-13. The completed iOS app, showing the pin for Austin on
the map
15
Chapter 1 Creating Your First MapKit App
S
ummary
We have now created an iOS application that shows a pin on a map.
Along the way, we have covered the MapKit framework, map views, and
annotations.
In the next chapter, we will build on the basic map application we built
here and display the user’s location on the map. If you would like to try a
similar project to this example out with the Google Maps for iOS SDK or
the Mapbox SDK, please see Chapters 7 and 11, respectively.
16
CHAPTER 2
If your app relies on using the user’s location in the background, iOS
will pop up a confirmation alert to the user that says your app is continuing
to use their location in the background, and would they like to continue
providing their location? Many users will turn off location sharing at that
point.
• NSLocationWhenInUseUsageDescription
• NSLocationAlwaysAndWhenInUseUsageDescription
18
Another Random Document on
Scribd Without Any Related Topics
the way places during the persecutions, he was scarcely in a mood
to do so when he was flung into a filthy dungeon, or when he was
stretched on the rack thirteen different times as a prelude to being
hanged, drawn and quartered at Tyburn.
Eleven years after that tragedy, Jacob Balde was born in the
imperial free town of Ensisheim in Alsace. He studied the classics
and rhetoric in the Jesuit college of that place, and philosophy and
law at Ingolstadt, where he became a Jesuit on July 1, 1624. To
amuse himself, when professor of rhetoric, he wrote his mock-heroic
of the battle of the frogs and mice, "Batrachomyomachia." His
mastery of classical Latin and the consummate ease with which he
handled the ancient verse made him the wonder of the day. "His
patriotic accents," says Herder, "made him a German poet for all
time." The tragedies of the Thirty Years War urged him to strive to
awaken the old national spirit in the hearts of the people. He was
chiefly a lyrist, and was hailed as the German Horace, but he was at
home in epic, drama, elegy, pastoral poetry and satire. Of course, he
wrote in Latin, which was the language of the cultured classes, for
German was then too crude and unwieldy to be employed as a
vehicle for poetry. His works fill eight volumes.
No less a personage than Isaac Watts, the English hymnologist,
makes Mathias Sarbiewski (Sarbievius), the Pole, another Horace,
though his poetry was mostly Pindaric. Grotius puts him above
Horace (Brucker, 505). He was a court preacher, a companion of the
king in his travels, a musician and an artist. He wrote four books of
lyrics, a volume of epodes, another of epigrams, and there is a
posthumous work of his called "Silviludia." His muse was both
religious and patriotic, and because of the former, he was called by
the Pope to help in the revision of the hymns of the Breviary; and for
that work he was crowned by King Wladislaw. His prose works run
into eight volumes. There are twenty-two translations of his poems
in Polish, and there are others in German, Italian, Flemish,
Bohemian, English and French.
Gosse in his "Seventeenth Century Studies" says that Famian
Strada who wrote "The Nightingale" was not professedly a poet but
a lecturer on rhetoric. "The Nightingale" was first published in Rome
in 1617 in a volume of "Prolusiones" on rhetoric and poetry, and
occurs in the sixth lecture of the second course. "This Jesuit
Rhetorician," Gosse informs us, "had been trying to familiarize his
pupils with the style of the great Classic poets, by reciting to them
passages in imitation of Ovid, Lucretius, Lucian and others. 'This,' he
told them 'is an imitation of the style of Claudian,' and so he gives us
the lines which have become so famous. That a single fragment in a
schoolbook should so suddenly take root and blossom in European
literature, when all else that its voluminous author wrote and said
was promptly forgotten, is very curious but not unprecedented." In
England, the first to adopt the poem was John Ford in his play of
"The Lover's Melancholy" in 1629; Crashaw came next with his
"Music's Duel," Ambrose Philips essayed it a century later; and in our
own days, François Coppée introduced it with charming effect in his
"Luthier de Crémone."
The French Jesuit Sautel was a contemporary of Strada and
Balde. He was considered the Ovid of his time, and was as
remarkable for the holiness of his life as for his unusual poetical
ability.
About this time, there was a German Jesuit, named Jacob Masen
or Masenius, who was a professor of rhetoric in Cologne, and died in
1681. Among his manuscripts found after his death were three
volumes, the first of which was a treatise on general literature, the
second a collection of lyrics, epics, elegies etc., and the third a
number of dramas. In the second manuscript was an epic entitled
"Sarcotis." The world would never have known anything about
"Sarcotis" had not a Scotchman, named Lauder, succeeded in finding
it, somewhere, about 1753, i. e. seventy-two years after Masen's
death. He ran it through the press immediately, to prove that Milton
had copied it in his "Paradise Lost." Whereupon all England rose in
its wrath to defend its idol. Lauder was convicted of having
intercalated in the "Sarcotis," a Latin translation of some of the lines
of "Paradise Lost," and had to hide himself in some foreign land to
expiate his crime against the national infatuation. Four years later
(1757), Abbé Denouart published a translation of the genuine text of
"Sarcotis." The poem was found to be an excellent piece of work,
and like "Paradise Lost," its theme was the disobedience of Adam
and Eve, their expulsion from Paradise, the disasters consequent
upon this sin of pride. Whether Milton ever read "Sarcotis" is not
stated.
Frederick von Spee is another Jesuit poet. He was born at
Kaiserwerth on the Rhine on February 25, 1591, entered the Society
in 1610, and studied, taught and preached for many years like the
rest of his brethren. An attempt to assassinate him was made in
1629. He was in Treves, when it was stormed by the imperial forces
in 1635, witnessed all its horrors, and died from an infection which
he caught while nursing the sick and wounded soldiers in the
hospital. It was only in the stormy period of his life that he wrote in
verse. Two of his works, the "Goldenes Tugendbuch," and the
"Trutznachtigal" were published after his death. The former was
highly prized by Leibniz as a book of devotion. The latter, which has
in recent times been repeatedly reprinted and revised, occupies a
conspicuous place among the lyrical collection of the seventeenth
century. His principal work, however, the one, in fact, which gave
him a world-wide reputation, (a result he was not aiming at, for the
book was probably published without his consent), is the "Cautio
Criminalis," which virtually ended the witchcraft trials. It is written in
exquisite Latin, and describes with thrilling vividness and cutting
sarcasm the horrible abuses in the prevailing legal proceedings,
particularly the use of the rack. The moral impression produced by
the work soon put a stop to the atrocities in many places, though
many a generation had to pass before witch-burning ceased in
Germany.
Perhaps it may be worth while to mention the wonderful Beschi,
a missionary in Madura, whose Tamil poetry ordinary mortals will
never have the pleasure of enjoying. Besides writing Tamil grammars
and dictionaries, as well as doctrinal works for his converts, not to
speak of his books of controversy against the Danish Lutherans who
attempted to invade the missions, he wrote a poem of eleven
hundred stanzas in honor of St. Quiteria, and another known as the
"Unfading Garland," which is said to be a Tamil classic. It is divided
into thirty-six cantos, containing in all 3615 stanzas. Baumgartner
calls it an epic which for richness and beauty of language, for easy
elegance of metre, true poetical conception and execution, is the
peer of the native classics, while in nobility of thought and subject
matter it is superior to them as the harmonious civilization of
Christianity is above the confused philosophical dreams and
ridiculous fables of idolatry. It is in honor of St. Joseph. His satire
known as "The Adventures of Guru Paramarta" is the most
entertaining book of Tamil literature. Beschi himself translated it into
Latin; it has also appeared in English, French, German and Italian.
These are about the only poets of very great prominence the
Society can boast of; but though she rejoices in the honor they won,
she regards their song only as an accidental attraction in the lives of
those distinguished children of hers. What she cherishes most is the
piety of Sarbiewski and Balde, the martyrdom of charity gladly
accepted by von Spee, the missionary ardor of Beschi, and the blood
offering made by Southwell to restore the Faith to his unhappy
country.
Apart from these, Gresset also may be claimed as a Jesuit poet,
but unfortunately it was his poetry that blasted his career as an
apostle, for the epicureanism of one of his effusions compelled his
dismissal from the Society. His brilliant talents counted for nothing in
such a juncture. He left the Order with bitter regret on his part, but
never lost his affection for it, and never failed to defend it against its
calumniators. His "Adieux aux Jésuites" is a classic. In vain Voltaire
and Frederick the Great invited him to Potsdam. He loathed them
both, and withdrew to Amiens, where he spent the last eighteen
years of his life in seclusion, prayer and penance, never leaving the
place except twice in all that time. On both occasions it was to go to
the French Academy, of which his great literary ability had made him
a member. In 1750 he founded at Amiens the Academy of Sciences,
Arts and Letters which still exists. It is said that before he died he
burned all his manuscripts, and one cannot help regretting that
instead of publishing he had not committed to the flames the poem
that caused his withdrawal from the Society. For Gresset the Jesuits
have always had a great tenderness, and it might be added here
that he is a fair sample of most of those who, for one reason or
another, have severed their connection with the Society. There have
been only a few instances to the contrary, and even they repented
before they died.
In the matter of oratory, the Society has had some respectable
representatives as for example, that extraordinary genius, Vieira, the
man whose stormy eloquence put an end to the slavery of the
Indians in Brazil, and whose "Discourse for the success of the
Portuguese arms," pronounced when the Dutch were besieging
Bahia in 1640, was described by the sceptical Raynal to be "the most
extraordinary outburst of Christian eloquence." He is considered to
have been one of the world's masters of oratory of his time, and to
have been equally great in the cathedrals of Europe and the rude
shrines of the Maranhão. He was popular, practical, profoundly
original and frequently sublime. He has left fifteen volumes of
sermons alone. Though brought up in Brazil he is regarded as a
Portuguese classic.
Paolo Segneri, who died in 1694, is credited with being, after St.
Bernardine of Siena and Savonarola, Italy's greatest orator. For
twenty-seven years he preached all through the Peninsula. His
eloquence was surpassed only by his holiness, and to the ardor of an
apostle he added the austerities of a penitent. He has been
translated into many languages, even into Arabic.
Omitting many others, for we are mentioning only the
supereminently great, there is a Bourdaloue, who is entitled by even
the enemies of the Society the prédicateur des rois et le roi des
prédicateurs (the preacher of kings and the king of preachers.) For
thirty-four years he preached to the most exacting audience in the
world, the brilliant throngs that gathered around Louis XIV, and till
the end, it was almost impossible to approach the church when he
was to occupy the pulpit. Lackeys were on guard days before the
sermon. The "Edinburgh Review" of December, 1826, says of him:
"Between Massillon and Bossuet, at a great distance certainly above
the latter, stands Bourdaloue, and in the vigor and energy of his
reasoning he was undeniably, after the ancients, Massillon's model.
If he is more harsh, and addressed himself less to the feelings and
passions, it is certain that he displays a fertility of resources and an
exuberance of topics, either for observation or argument, which are
not equalled by any orator, sacred or profane. It is this fertility, this
birthmark of genius, that makes us certain of finding in every subject
handled by him, something new, something which neither his
predecessors have anticipated nor his followers have imitated."
To this Protestant testimony may be added that of the Jansenist
Sainte-Beuve in his "Causeries du Lundi." His estimate of Bourdaloue
is as follows: "I know all that can be said and that is said about
Bossuet. But let us not exaggerate. Bossuet was sublime in his
'Funeral Orations', but he had not the same excellence in his
sermons. He was uneven and unfinished. In that respect, even while
Bossuet was still living, Bourdaloue was his master. That was the
opinion of their contemporaries, and doubtless of Bossuet himself.
Unlike Bossuet, Bourdaloue did not hold the thunders in his hand,
nor did the lightnings flash around his pulpit, nor, like Massillon, did
he pour out perfumes from his urn. But he was the orator, such as
he alone could have been, who for thirty-four years in succession
could preach and be useful. He did not spend himself all at once, did
not gain lustre by a few achievements, nor startle by some of those
splendid utterances which carry men away and evoke their plaudits;
but he lasted; he built up with perfect surety; he kept on incessantly,
and his power was like an army whose work is not merely to gain
one or two battles, but to establish itself in the heart of the enemy's
country and stay there. That is the wonderful achievement of the
man whom his contemporaries called 'The Great Bourdaloue', and
whom people obstinately persist in describing as 'the judicious and
estimable Bourdaloue.'
"He had what was called the imperatoria virtus, that sovereign
quality of a general who rules every alignment and every step of his
soldiers, so that nothing moves them but his command. Such is the
impression conveyed by the structure of his discourses; by their
dialectical form, by their solid demonstrations, which move forward
from the start, first by pushing ahead the advance corps, then
dividing his battalions into two or three groups, and finally
establishing a line of battle facing the consciences of his hearers. On
one occasion, when he was about to preach at St. Sulpice there was
a noise in the church because of the crowd, when above the tumult
the voice of Condé was heard, shouting, as Bourdaloue entered the
pulpit: 'Silence! Behold the enemy!'"
We may subjoin to these two appreciations the judgment of the
Abbé Maury, himself a great orator. He is cited by Sainte-Beuve:
"Bourdaloue is more equal and restrained than Bossuet in the beauty
and incomparable richness of his designs and plans, which seem like
unique conceptions in the art and control of a discourse wherein he
is without a rival; in his dialectic power, in his didactic and steady
progress, in his ever increasing strength, in his exact and serried
logic, and in the sustained eloquence of his ratiocination, in the
solidity and opulence of his doctrinal preaching he is inexhaustible
and unapproachable." Sainte-Beuve adds to this eulogy:
"Bourdaloue's life and example proclaim with a still louder emphasis,
that to be eloquent to the end, to be so, both far and near, to wield
authority and to compel attention, whether on great or startling,
simple or useful themes, you must have what is the principle and
source of it all, the virtue of Bourdaloue."
With the exception of Padre Isla, the satirist, and Baltasar
Gracián, author of "Worldly Wisdom" and of "El Criticón," which
seems to have suggested Robinson Crusoe to Defoe, the Society has
not produced any very remarkable prose writer in the lighter kind of
literature, and perhaps even their style in other kinds of writing may
have suffered because of the intensity and rapidity with which they
were compelled to work. Nevertheless some of them are said to be
classics in their respective languages as, for instance, Vieira in
Portuguese, Ribadeneira in Spanish, and Skarga in Polish. The
Frenchman, Dominique Bouhours, is perhaps the one who is most
remarkable in this respect. Petit de Julleville in his "Histoire de la
langue et de la littérature française" says that "Bouhours was
incontestably the master of correct writing in his generation. The
statutes of the Jesuits prevented him from being an Academician,
but he 'was something better,' as someone said when the Father was
striving to evade him: 'Academiam tu mihi solus facis — For me you
constitute the Academy.' Not only in his Order was he considered the
official censor, under whose eyes all sorts of writings had to pass,
even those of Maimbourg and Bourdaloue, but people came from all
parts of the literary world to consult him. Saint-Evremond and
Bossuet were only too glad to be guided by him. The President
Lamoigno submitted to him his official pronouncements, and Racine
sent his poems with the request to 'mark the faults that might have
been made in the language of which you are one of the most
excellent judges.' In the history of the French language Bouhours
left no date — he made an epoch."
The Jesuits were also literary arbiters in countries and
surroundings where there was no Bouhours. Thus the Society had
four or five hundred grammarians and lexicographers of the
languages of almost every race under the sun. Wherever the
missionaries went, their first care was to compile a dictionary and
make a grammar of the speech of the natives among whom they
were laboring, and if the learned world at present knows anything at
all of the language of vast numbers of aboriginal tribes who have
now vanished from the earth, it is due to the labors of the Jesuit
missionaries.
But this was only an infinitesimal part of their literary output. In
his "Bibliothèque des écrivains de la compagnie de Jésus," which is
itself a stupendous literary achievement, Sommervogel has already
drawn up a list of 120,000 Jesuit authors and he has restricted
himself to those who have ceased from their labors on earth and are
now only busy in reading the book of life. Nor do these 120,000
authors merely connote 120,000 books; for some of these writers
were most prolific in their publications. The illustrious Gretser, for
instance, "the Hammer of Heretics," as he was called, is credited
with two hundred and twenty-nine titles of printed works and thirty-
nine MSS. which range over the whole field of erudition open to his
times: archæology, numismatics, theology, philology, polemics,
liturgy, and so on. Kircher, who died in 1680, wrote about
everything. During the time he sojourned in Rome, he issued forty-
four folio volumes on subjects that are bewildering in their diversity
and originality: hieroglyphics, astronomy, astrology, medico-physics,
linguistics, ethnology, horoscopy, and what not else besides. We owe
to him the earliest counting-machine, and it was he who perfected
the Aeolian harp, the speaking tube, and the microscope.
We have chosen these great men merely as examples of the
literary activity of the Society during the seventeenth and eighteenth
centuries. Indeed, this inundation of books grew so alarming in its
proportions that the enemies of the Church complained that it was a
plot of the Jesuits who, being unable to suppress other books, had
determined to deluge the world with their own publications.
In the domain of church history they have, it is true, nothing to
compare, in size, with the thirty volumes of the Dominican Natalis
Alexander; the thirty-six of Fleury; or the twenty-eight of the
"España Sagrada" of the Augustinian Flórez, which, under his
continuator, Risco, reached forty volumes. Bérault-Bercastel, indeed,
wrote twenty-eight, but it was after the Society was suppressed.
Perhaps they refrained from entering that field because they
regarded it to be sufficiently covered, or because, in order to devote
one's self to historical work, one needs leisure, great libraries, and
security of possession. Their absorbing pedagogical and missionary
work left leisure to but a few Jesuits in those stirring times, and they
were besides being continually despoiled of the great libraries they
had gathered, and never sure of having a roof over their heads the
day after a work might be begun. Seizures and expulsions form a
continual series in the Society's history. On the other hand, they
were making history by their explorations, and the letters they sent
from all parts of the world which according to rule they were
compelled to write, furnish to-day and for all time, the most
invaluable historical data for every part of the globe. As a matter of
fact, they had not even time to write an account of their own Order.
Cordara, Orlandini, Jouvancy, and Sacchini cover only limited
periods, and as has been remarked above, it was not until Father
Martín ordered a complete series of histories of the various sections
of the Society that the work was undertaken. This is planned on a
much vaster scale than the older writers ever dreamt of, and some
of the volumes have already been published.
In profane history, however, the versatile Famian Strada
distinguished himself in 1632 by his "Wars of Flanders," and the
work was continued by two of his religious brethren, Dondini and
Gallucio. Clavigero's "Ancient History of Mexico," in three quarto
volumes, published after the Suppression, is a notable work, as are
also his "History of California," and a third on the "Spanish
Conquest." Alegre's three volumes, "History of the Society of Jesus
in New Spain" is of great value. Mariana's complete "History of
Spain," in twenty-five books, is still recognized as an authority, and it
will be of interest to know that as late as 1888 a statue was erected
at Talavera, in honor of the same tumultuous writer, who was
incarcerated for his book on "Finance." Charlevoix's voluminous
histories of New France, of Japan, of Paraguay, and of Santo
Domingo are also worthy of consideration. Bancroft frequently refers
to him as a valuable historian, and John Gilmary Shea insists that he
is too generally esteemed to need commendation.
There is, however, an historical work of the Society which has no
peer in literature: the great hagiological collection known as the
"Acta Sanctorum" of the Bollandists, which was begun in the first
years of the seventeenth century, and is still being elaborated. It
consists at present of sixty-four folio volumes. This vast enterprise
was conceived by the Belgian Father Rosweyde, but is known as the
work of the Bollandists, from the name of Rosweyde's immediate
successor, Bollandus. When the first volume, which was very
diminutive when compared with the present massive tomes, was
sent to Cardinal Bellarmine, he exclaimed: "this man wants to live
three hundred years." He regarded the plan as chimerical, but it has
been realized by a self-perpetuating association of Jesuits living at
Brussels. When one member is worn out or dies, someone else is
appointed to fill the gap, and so the work goes on uninterruptedly.
The two first volumes, containing pages, which appeared in 1643,
aroused the enthusiasm of the scientific world, and Pope Alexander
VII publicly testified that "there had never been undertaken a work
more glorious or more useful to the Church."
In other fields of work the Society has not been idle. Even the
acrid "Realencyclopädie fur protestantische Theologie und Kirche"
says (VIII, 758), "the Order has not lacked scholars. It can point to a
long series of brilliant names among its members, but they have
only given real aid to the advancement of science in those spheres
which have close connection with the doctrines of the Church, such
as mathematics, the natural sciences, chronology, explanation of
classical writers and inscriptions. The service of Jesuit astronomers
like Christopher Schlüssel (Clavius), the corrector of the calendar;
Christopher Schreiner, the discoverer of the sun spots; Francesco Da
Vico, the discoverer of a comet and observer of the transit of Venus;
Angelo Secchi, the investigator of the sun, and a meteorologist, are
universally acknowledged. And no less credit is given to the services
of the Order afforded by the optician Grimaldi; and that much
praised all-round scholar and universal genius (Doctor centum
artium) Athanasius Kircher. Among the classical writers is Angelo
Mai."
This is certainly not a bad list from an unfriendly source, and
possibly might be helped out by a few suggestions. Thus Otto
Hartig, the Assistant Librarian of the Royal Library of Munich, tells us
in "The Catholic Encyclopedia" that Ritter very justly traces the
source and beginning of modern geography to the "Acta Sanctorum"
of the Jesuit Bollandists, who gathered up the crude notes of the
journeys of the early missionaries with their valuable information
about the customs, language and religion of the inhabitants on the
frontiers of the Roman Empire, along the Rhine and Danube, of the
British Isles, Russia, Poland, the Faröe Islands, Iceland and the Far
East. Another signal contribution to geography was the "Historia
natural y moral de las Indias" of José d'Acosta, one of the most
brilliant writers on the natural history of the New World and the
customs of the Indians. The first thorough exploration of Brazil was
made by Jesuit missionaries led by Father Ferre (1599-1632). The
Portuguese priests, Alvares and Bermudes, who went to Abyssinia on
an embassy to the king of that country, were followed by the Jesuits.
Fernandes crossed southern Abyssinia in 1613, and set foot in
regions which until recently were closed to Europeans. Páez and
Lobo were the first to reach the sources of the Blue Nile, and as
early as the middle of the seventeenth century, they with Almeida,
Menendes and Teles drew up a map of Abyssinia which is considered
the best produced before the time of Abbadie (1810-97). The Jesuit
missionaries, Machado, Affonso and Paiva, in 1630 endeavored to
establish communications between Abyssinia and the Congo; Ricci
and Schall, both of whom were learned astronomers, made a
cartographic survey of China. Ricci is commonly known as the
Geographer of China, and is compared to Marco Polo. Andrada was
the first to enter Tibet, a feat which was not repeated until our own
times. The Jesuits of Canada, among whom was Marquette, were
the first to furnish the learned world with information about upper
North America; Mexico and California as far as the Rio Grande, were
travelled by Kino (1644-1711), Sedlmayer (1703-79) and Baegert
(1717-77); and the Jesuit, Wolfgang Beyer, reached Lake Titicaca
between 1752 and 1766 — eighty years before the celebrated globe-
navigator Meyer arrived there. Ramion sailed up the Cassiquiare,
from the Río Negro to the Orinoco in 1744, and thus anticipated La
Condamine, Humboldt, and Bonpland. Samuel Fritz in 1684
established the importance of the Maranhão as the main tributary of
the Amazon, and drew the first map of the country. Techo (1673),
Harques (1687), and Durán (1638) told the world all about
Paraguay, and d'Ovaglia (1646) about Chile. Gruber and d'Orville
reached Lhasa from Pekin, and went down into India through the
Himalaya passes.
Possibly it is worth while here to give more than a passing notice
to the ascent of the Nile in the seventeenth century, made by the
noted Pedro Páez, a Spanish Jesuit. He left an account of it which
Kircher published in his "Œdipus Ægyptiacus" but which James
Bruce angrily described as an invention. Bruce claims that he himself
was the first to explore the river. But Bruce followed Páez by at least
150 years. The question is discussed at length by two writers in the
"Biographie universelle," under the titles "Bruce" and "Paez."
Páez was born at Olmeda in 1564. He entered the Society when
he was eighteen years of age and was sent to Goa in 1588. He was
assigned to attempt an entry of Abyssinia; to facilitate his work, he
assumed the dress of an Armenian. He had to wait a year for a ship
at Ormuz, and when, at last, he embarked he was captured by an
Arab pirate, ill-treated and thrown into prison. As he was unable to
procure a ransom, he spent seven years chained to the oar as a
galley slave, but was finally set free and reached Goa in 1596. He
was then employed in several missions of Hindostan, but again set
out for Abyssinia which he reached in 1603. To acquaint himself with
the language of the people he buried himself in a monastery of
Monophysite monks, and then began to give public lessons in the
city. His success as a teacher attracted attention, and he was finally
called before the emperor, where his eloquence and correctness of
speech captivated and ultimately helped to convert the monarch. A
grant of land was given him at Gorgora where he built a church. The
question of the sources of the Nile was frequently discussed, and in
1618 Páez ascended the river. He was thus the first modern
European to make the attempt. He told the story in the two large
octavos, which at the time of the Suppression could be found in
most of the libraries of the Society. Bruce asserts, however, that
nothing is said in these volumes about the discovery, and he accuses
Kircher of imposture. But, says the writer in the "Biographie
universelle," the fact is that between the account of Páez and that of
Bruce there is scarcely any difference except in a few insignificant
details; so that if Bruce is right, so also are Páez and Kircher. Páez
explored the river as early as 1618, whereas Bruce arrived there only
in 1772, that is 154 years later. "Bruce," says another writer "makes
it clear that someone had preceded him and displays his temper in
every line."
The great English work, "The Dictionary of National Biography,"
handles Bruce more severely. "He was in error," it says, "in regarding
himself as the first European who had reached these fountains.
Pedro Páez, the Jesuit, had undoubtedly done so in 1615, and
Bruce's unhandsome attempt to throw doubt on the fact only proves
that love of fame is not literally the last infirmity of noble minds, but
may bring much more unlovely symptoms in its train. He was
endowed with excellent abilities, but was swayed to an undue
degree by self-esteem and thirst for fame. He was uncandid to those
he regarded as rivals, and vanity and the passion for the picturesque
led him to embellish minor particulars and perhaps in some
instances to invent them. He delayed for twelve years the
composition of his narrative and then dictated it to an amanuensis,
indolently omitting to refer to the original journals and hence
frequently making a lamentable confusion of facts and dates. His
report is highly idealised and he will always be the poet of African
travel." The book did not appear till 1790. The missionary success of
Páez consisted in uniting schismatical Abyssinia to Rome in 1624. He
died shortly afterwards, and, when the depraved Emperor Basilides
mounted the throne in 1634, the Jesuit missionaries were handed
over to the axe of the executioner. Páez, it may be remarked, was
not the only one whom Bruce vilified. After Páez came the
Portuguese Jesuit Jeronimo Lobo, a very interesting and lengthy
account of whose daring missionary work may be found in the
"Biographie universelle." The writer tells us that Lobo published his
narrative in 1659, and that it was again edited by the Royal Society
of London in 1688. Legrand translated it into French in 1728, and Dr.
Samuel Johnson gave a compendious translation of it in 1734. The
complete book was reprinted in 1798, and in the preface the editors
take Bruce to task for his treatment of both Páez and Lobo. It is
worthy of remark that the notice of "Bruce" in the "Encyclopedia
Britannica" (ninth edition) does not say a single word either of Páez
or Lobo, although both had attracted so much notice in the modern
literary world.
It was due to the Jesuits that France established subventions for
geographical research. In 1651 Martino Martini, kinsman of the
celebrated Eusebio Kino, published his "Atlas Sinensis", which
Richtoven described as "the fullest geographical description of China
that we have." Kircher published his famous "China illustrata" in
1667. Verbiest was the imperial astronomer in China, and so aroused
the interest of Louis XIV that he sent out six Jesuit astronomers at
his own expense and equipped them with the finest instruments.
One of these envoys, Gerbillon, explored the unknown regions north
of China, and he, with Buvet, Régis and Jarton and others, made a
survey of the Great Wall, and then mapped out the whole Chinese
empire (1718). Manchuria and Mongolia as far as the Russian
frontier and Tibet to the sources of the Ganges were included. The
map ranks as a masterpiece even to-day. It consists of 120 sheets,
and it has formed the basis of all the native maps made since then.
De Halde edited all the reports sent to him by his brethren, and
published them in his "Description géographique, historique,
politique, physique et chronologique de l'empire de Chine et de la
Tartarie chinoise." The material for the maps in this work was
prepared by d'Anville, the greatest geographer of the time, but he
was not a Jesuit. In addition to these works, were written fifteen
volumes by the missionaries of Pekin about the history and customs
of the Chinese, and published in Paris.
These Jesuit astronomers and geographers were associate
members of all the learned societies of Europe, and were especially
serviceable to those bodies in being able to determine the longitude
and latitude of the places they described. Between 1684 and 1686
they fixed the exact position of the Cape of Good Hope and of
Louveau in Siam. As early as 1645 Riccioli attempted to determine
the length of a degree of longitude. Similar work was done by
Thoma in China, Boscovitch and Maire in the Papal States, Leisganig
in Austria; Mayer in the Palatinate, and Beccaria and Canonica in
northwestern Italy. Veda published the first map of the Philippines
about 1734. Mezburg and Guessman made maps of Galicia and
Poland, Andrian of Carinthia, and Christian Meyer of the Rhine from
Basle to Mainz. Riccioli, a distinguished reformer of cartography,
published his "Almagestum novum", and his "Geographia et
hydrographia reformata" as early as 1661. Kircher gave the world his
"Arsmagnetica" and "Mundus subterraneus" about the same time,
and made the ascent of Etna and Stromboli at the risk of his life, to
measure their craters. His theory of the interior of the earth was
accepted by Leibniz and by the entire Neptunist school of geology.
He was the first to attempt to chart the ocean currents. Heinrich
Scherer of Dillingen (1620-1704) devoted his whole life to
geography, and made the first orographical and hydrographical
synoptic charts. Johann Jacob Hemmer was the founder of the first
meteorological society, which had contributors from all over the
world. This list is sufficiently glorious.
Perhaps it might be noted here that these eminent men were
not primarily seeking distinction or aiming at success in the sciences
to which they devoted themselves. That consideration occupied only
a secondary place in their thoughts and the glory they achieved was
sought exclusively to enable them the more easily to reach the souls
of men. But on the other hand, that motive inspired them with
greater zeal in the prosecution of their work than a merely human
purpose would have done. Assuredly, it would have been much more
comfortable for Ricci and Schall and Verbiest and Grimaldi to be
looking through telescopes in the observatories of Europe than at
Canton or Pekin, where every moment they were in danger of
having their heads cut off. As a matter of fact, after more than forty
years of service for China's education in mathematics and
astronomy, the only reward that Father Schall reaped was, as we
have seen, to be dragged to court, though he was paralyzed and
speechless, and to be condemned to be hacked to pieces.
It is quite true that the philosophers of the Society have never
evolved any independent philosophical or theological thought, in the
modern acceptation of that term. That is, they have never acted like
the captain of a ship who would throw his charts and compass
overboard, and insist that North is South because he thinks it so.
The aim of philosophy is intellectual truth and not the extravagances
of a disordered imagination. Contrary to the modern superstition,
Catholic philosophers are not hampered in their speculations by
authority, nor are they compelled in their study of logic, metaphysics
and ethics to draw proofs from revelation. Philosophy is a human not
a divine science, but on the other hand, Catholic philosophy is
prevented from going over the abyss by the possession of a higher
knowledge than unassisted human reason could ever attain. Thus
protected, it speculates with an audacity, of which those who are not
so provided can have no conception. For them philosophy runs
through the whole theological course, and when Holy Scripture, the
pronouncements of the Church, and the utterances of the Fathers
have established the truth of the particular doctrine which is under
consideration, then reason enters, and elevated, ennobled, fortified
and illumined, it walks secure in the highest realms of thought.
Three entire years are given to the explicit study of it, in the
formation of the Jesuit scholastic, and it continues to be employed
throughout his four or five years of theology. Both sciences are
fundamental in the Society's studies, and it has not lacked honor in
either. But as philosophy is subsidiary and ancillary, it will be
sufficient to set forth what is said about the Society's theologians.
Dr. Joseph Pohle writing in "The Catholic Encyclopedia" tells us
that controversial theology was carried to the highest perfection by
Cardinal Bellarmine. Indeed, there is no theologian who has
defended almost the whole of Catholic theology against the attacks
of the Reformers with such clearness and convincing force. Other
theologians who were remarkable for their masterly defence of the
Catholic Faith were the Spanish Jesuit Gregory of Valencia (d. 1603)
and his pupils Adam Tanner (d. 1635) and Jacob Gretser (d. 1625).
Nor can there be any question that Scholastic theology owes most of
its classical works to the Society of Jesus. Molina was the first Jesuit
to write a commentary on the theological "Summa" of St. Thomas,
and was followed by Cardinal Toletus and those other brilliant
Spaniards, Gregory of Valencia, Suárez, Vasquez, and Didacus Rúiz.
Suárez, the most prominent among them, is also the foremost
theologian the Society of Jesus has produced. His renown is due not
only to the fertility and wealth of his literary productions, but also to
his clearness, moderation, depth and circumspection. He had a critic,
both subtle and severe, in his colleague, Gabriel Vásquez. Didacus
Rúiz wrote masterly treatises on God and the Trinity, as did
Christopher Gilles; and they were followed by Harruabal, Ferdinand
Bastida, Valentine Herice, and others whose names will be forever
linked with the history of Molinism. During the succeeding period,
John Præpositus, Caspar Hurtado, and Antonio Pérez won fame by
their commentaries on St. Thomas. Ripalda wrote the best treatise
on the supernatural order. To Leonard Lessius we owe some
beautiful treatises on God and his attributes. Coninck made the
Trinity, the Incarnation, and the Sacraments his special study.
Cardinal John de Lugo, noted for his mental acumen and highly
esteemed as a moralist, wrote on the virtue of Faith and the
Sacraments of Penance and the Eucharist. Claude Tiphanus is the
author of a classical monograph on the notions of personality and
hypostasis, and Cardinal Pallavicini, known as the historiographer of
the Council of Trent, won repute as a dogmatic theologian by several
of his writings (XIV, 593-94).
With regard to moral theology, Lehmkhul tells us that in the
middle of the eighteenth century there arose a man who was, so to
say, a blessing of Divine Providence. Owing to the eminent sanctity
which he combined with solid learning, he definitely established the
system of moral theology which now prevails in the Church. That
man was St. Alphonsus Maria Liguori, who was canonized in 1839,
and declared a Doctor of the Church in 1871. In his youth he was
imbued with the stricter principles of moral theology, but as he
himself confesses, the experience of fifteen years of missionary life
and careful study brought him to realize the falseness and the evil
consequences of the system in which he had been educated, and
the necessity of a change. He, therefore, took the "Medulla" of the
Jesuit, Hermann Busembaum, subjected it to a thorough
examination, confirmed it by internal reasons and external authority,
and then published a work which was received with universal
applause, and whose doctrine is entirely on Probabilistic principles.
This approval and appropriation of Busembaum's teaching by one
who has been made a Doctor of the Church is a sufficient vindication
of the doctrine of Probabilism, for which the Society suffered so
much, and is at the same time a magnificent tribute to the greatness
of Busembaum, "whose book," Lehmkuhl contents himself with
saying, "was widely used," whereas forty editions of it had been
issued during the author's own life, which happened to be an entire
century before the publication of Liguori's great work. Busembaum's
"Medulla" was printed in 1645, and Liguori's "Moral Theology" in
1748. Up to 1845, there were 200 editions of Busembaum; that is,
one edition for every year of its existence. In the history of moral
theology Sánchez, Layman, Azor, Castro Palao, Torres, Escobar also
may be cited as leading lights.
In Scripture there are the illustrious names of Maldonado,
Ribera, Prado, Pereira, Sancio and Pineda. Of the saintly Cornelius a
Lapide (Vanden Steen) a Protestant critic, Goetzius, said in 1699:
"He is the most important of Catholic Scriptural writers." His
"Commentary of the Apocalypse" has been translated into Arabic. In
ascetical theology, St. Ignatius is a leader in modern times; and his
"Spiritual Exercises" form a complete system of asceticism. With him
are a great number of his sons, whose names are familiar in every
religious house, such as Bellarmine, Rodríguez, Alvarez de Paz,
Gaudier, da Ponte, Lessius, Lancicius, Surin, Saint-Jure, Neumayr,
Dirckink, Scaramelli, Nieremberg and many others. Finally, it can not
be denied that the Society has hearkened to the second rule of the
Summary of its Constitutions, which is read publicly and with an
unfailing regularity every month of the year, in every one of its
houses throughout the world, namely: that "the End of this Society
is not only to attend to the salvation and perfection of our own
souls, with the divine grace, but with the same, seriously to employ
ourselves in procuring the salvation and perfection of our neighbor."
The canonization of saints proceeds very slowly in the modern
Church. Years and years are spent in preliminary investigations of
the life, the holiness, the doctrines, and the miracles of the one who
is to be presented to the public recognition of the Church.
Theologians and canonists have to pass on all those points and
those who testify speak only under the most solemn oaths and the
threat of dire censure if they witness to what they know to be false.
Infinite labor has been expended before the question is presented to
the Holy See. Very many of these causes never reach even that
stage, for everywhere, in its progress, stands an official called the
Promoter of the Faith, but popularly known as the "Devil's
Advocate," whose work consists in doing his utmost to throw
obstacles in the way of the canonization. Nevertheless, the Society
has a sufficient number on its roll of fame, in spite of its
comparatively brief and perpetually perturbed existence, to convince
the world that it is not the maleficent organization that it is credited
with being.
At the head of the list come the two friends, Ignatius and Xavier,
dying within four years of each other: the latter in 1552, the former
in 1556. The third is Borgia, who died in 1572. He had set aside all
the honors of the world, except that of actual royalty, in order to
take the lowest place in the Society, but he became its chief. In
charming contrast with these three great men, are the three boy
saints: Stanislaus, Aloysius, and Berchmans, dying respectively in
1568, 1591 and 1621. Stanislaus, the little Polish noble, travelled all
the way from Vienna to Rome on foot, a distance of 1500 miles, to
enter the novitiate. He had no money, or guide, or friends, but he
arrived safely, for the angels gave him Communion on his journey,
and he has ever since been the darling of the beginners in religious
life. Aloysius was of princely blood, but died nursing the sick in the
hospital. He is the patron of youthful purity, and was never a priest,
though an unwise writer makes a missionary of him. The third, John
Berchmans, was neither prince nor noble. On the contrary, it used to
be the delight of foreigners, when rambling through the little Flemish
town of Diest, to see the name of "Berchmans" on the humble shops
of hucksters and grocers, and to fancy that some of the little lads
who clattered about in their sabots, on their way to school, were
relatives of his. His sanctity has made his family name famous in the
world. His beatification was especially welcome, because, as
Berchmans was the very incarnation of the Jesuit rule, the Order
cannot have been the iniquitous organization it is frequently said to
be.
Then there are three Japanese Jesuits who were crucified at
Nagasaki in 1597; and in 1616 came Alfonso Rodríguez, who had
prepared Peter Claver to be the Apostle of the negro slaves in
America, and who went quietly from his post at the gates of the
College of Minorca to the gates of heaven. Peter Claver had to wait
for thirty-eight years before going to join his venerable friend.
Besides the two St. Francises of the early days, there are two more
of that name in the Society: the Frenchman, John Francis Regis, who
died in 1640, and the Italian, Francis Hieronymo, whose work ended
in 1716. They were both preachers to the most abandoned classes.
Hieronymo could gather as many as 15,000 men to a regular
monthly Communion, and when he entered the royal convict ships,
he converted those sinks of iniquity into abodes of peace and
resignation.
It may be noted here that St. Francis Regis had a distinction
peculiarly his own. Long after his canonization as a saint, he was
proclaimed to have been actually expelled from the Society, and that
the public disgrace was prevented only by his death, which occurred
before the official papers arrived from Rome. This accusation is
trident-like in its wounding power or purpose. It transfixes Regis,
and kills his reputation for virtue; then it inflicts a gash on the
Society by making it present to the Church, as worthy of being
raised to the altars, a man whom it was unwilling to keep in its own
houses; finally, it assails the Church and attempts to show that no
respect should be had for its decrees of canonization. It was almost
unnecessary for the learned Bollandist, Van Ortroy, to show that
there is no foundation whatever for this story of the dismissal of St.
John Francis Regis from the Society of Jesus.
Such are the canonized Jesuits. The Blessed are more numerous.
There are ninety-one of them. First in time are the forty Portuguese
martyrs under Ignatius de Azevedo, who were slain by the French
Huguenots in a harbor of the Azores in the year 1570. Then follow
the English witnesses to the Truth. The first to die was Thomas
Woodhouse, who was executed in 1573. Between that date and
1582 four others were put to death; among them the illustrious
Edmund Campion. Of those who died in the persecutions of Japan,
between 1617 and 1627, there are thirty-one Japanese as well as
European Jesuits. Rudolf Aquaviva was put to death in Madura in
1583, and John de Britto in 1693. Two Hungarians, Melchior Grodecz
and Stephen Pongracz were slain in Hungary in 1619, and Andrew
Bobola was butchered by the Cossacks in 1657. There are others
among the Society's Blessed who were not martyred, but would
have been willing to win their crown in that way, if God so wanted.
They are Peter Faber, the first priest of the Society; Peter Canisius,
the Apostle of Germany; and the Italian Antonio Baldinucci, a great
missionary who used to whip himself to blood, to move the hearts of
the hardened sinners around him, and who lighted bonfires of bad
books and pictures and playing cards in the public squares to
impress his excitable fellow-countrymen. His missionary methods
were somewhat like those of Savonarola.
Those who are ranked as Venerable are fifty in number, including
Claude de la Colombiére, the Apostle of the devotion to the Sacred
Heart; Cardinal Bellarmine; Nicholas Lancicius, the well-known
ascetical writer; Julien Maunoir, the apostle of his native Brittany;
and José Anchieta, the thaumaturgus of Brazil. There are, however,
a great many others under consideration, among them being the
heroes of North America — Jogues, Goupil, Lalande, Brébeuf,
Lalemant, Garnier, Daniel, Chabanel — who were slain by the
Iroquois. In the conclaves of 1605, which elected Clement VIII and
Leo XI, Bellarmine was very seriously considered as a possible pope,
but the fact that he was a Jesuit was an obstacle in the eyes of
many. When he died in 1621, there was a general expectation that
he would be canonized for his extraordinarily holy life. In fact, Urban
VIII who was so rigid in such matters placed him among the
"Venerable" six years after his death. His case was re-introduced for
beatification in 1675, 1714, 1752 and 1832, but nothing was done
chiefly because it would have angered the French regalist politicians,
as his name was associated with a doctrine most obnoxious to them.
In 1920 the case was again taken up.
We omit the countless thousands of Jesuits who ever since the
Society was established have striven in every possible way to realize
its ideals; the heroes who have hurried with delight to the most
disgusting and dangerous missions they could find in the farthermost
parts of the world; who have died by thousands of disease and
exhaustion in the pest-laden ships that carried them to their
destination or flung them dead on some desolate coast; or those
who have been slain by savages or devoured by wild beasts; or who
died of starvation in the forests and deserts where they were
hunting for souls; or have given their lives with joy for the privilege
of ministering to the plague-stricken. Nor do we mention here the
great phalanxes of the unknown who, without a single regret for
what they might have been in the world, have endeavored to obey,
to some extent, at least, that startling admonition that they hear so
often: Ama nesciri et pro nihilo reputari: "Love to be unknown and
to be reputed as nothing," — the men who have truly lived up to that
ideal in the repulsiveness of hospitals and jails and asylums, or in
the ceaseless drudgery and obscurity of the class-room and the
unchanging routing of household occupations.
These men have seen themselves time and time again robbed of
all their possessions, hounded out of their own countries and cities
as if they were criminals, their names branded with infamy and a by-
word for all that is vile, and they understood better and better, as
time went on, what is meant by that page which stares at them from
their rule book and which is entitled: "The Sum and Scope of Our
Constitutions," and which tells them: "We are men crucified to the
world, and to whom the world is crucified; new men who have put
off their own affections to put on Christ, dead to themselves to live
to justice; who, with St. Paul, in labors, in watching, in fastings, in
chastity, in knowledge, in long-suffering, in sweetness, in the Holy
Ghost, in charity unfeigned, in the word of truth, shew themselves
ministers of God; and, by the armor of justice, on the right hand and
on the left, by honor and dishonor, by evil report and good report,
by good success and ill success, press forward with great strides to
their heavenly country, and by all means possible, and with all zeal,
urge on others also, ever looking to God's greatest glory."
CHAPTER XII
FROM VITELLESCHI TO RICCI
1615-1773
Pupils in the Thirty Years War — Caraffa; Piccolomini; Gottifredi — Mary Ward
— Alleged decline of the Society — John Paul Oliva — Jesuits in the Courts of Kings
— John Casimir — English Persecutions. Luzancy and Titus Oates — Jesuit
Cardinals — Gallicanism in France — Maimbourg — Dez — Troubles in Holland. De
Noyelle and Innocent XI — Attempted Schism in France — Gonzáles and
Probabilism — Don Pedro of Portugal — New assaults of Jansenists —
Administration of Retz — Election of Ricci — The Coming Storm.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
textbookfull.com