HRM, Unit - 1
HRM, Unit - 1
Scope/Significance of HRM
2. Job analysis design: Another important area of HRM is job analysis. Job analysis
gives a detailed explanation about each and every job in the company. Based on this
job analysis the company prepares advertisements.
3. Recruitment and selection: Based on information collected from job analysis the
company prepares advertisements and publishes them in the newspapers. A number of
applications are received after the advertisement is published, interviews are
conducted and the right employee is selected thus recruitment and selection are yet
another important areas of HRM.
4. Orientation and induction: Once the employees have been selected an induction or
orientation program is conducted. The employees are informed about the background
of the company. They are told about the organizational culture and values and work
ethics and introduce to the other employees.
5. Training and development: Every employee goes under training program which
helps him to put up a better performance on the job. Training program is also
conducted for existing staff that have a lot of experience. This is called refresher
training. Training and development is one area were the company spends a huge
amount.
6. Performance appraisal: Once the employee has put in around 1 year of service,
performance appraisal is conducted i.e. the HR department checks the performance of
the employee. Based on these appraisal future promotions, incentives, increments in
salary are decided.
8. Motivation, welfare, health and safety: Motivation becomes important to sustain the
number of employees in the company. It is the job of the HR department to look into
the different methods of motivation. Apart from this certain health and safety
regulations have to be followed for the benefits of the employees.
2. Functional Objectives
HRM performs many functions for other departments directly or indirectly. HR to
develop HRMS to maintain healthy working relationships among all the employees
and to adopt sound, desirable organization structure. HR to oversee whether the
3. Organizational Objectives
HRM has to prepare human resources to accomplish organizational goals. HRM to
achieve the organizational objectives like to earn profit, growth, expansion, survival,
diversification etc. via the HR functions namely planning, recruiting, selecting,
placement, induct, train and develop the human resources and to arrange for
performance appraisal of the employees. HRM serves other functional areas, so as to
help them to attain efficiency in their operations and benefit the organization. HR
should achieve organizational goals through the proper utilization of human
resources. Succession planning is an important aspect to be taken up as a
contemporary organizational objective.
4. Societal Objectives
HRM should follow the rules and laws or legal restrictions imposed by society. It has
to develop and maintain healthy relations between union and management. It is the
responsibility of Human Resource to ensure that legal, ethical, and social-
environmental issues are suitably dealt with. Contribute to minimization of socio-
economic evils such as unemployment problems, in equal distribution of income and
wealth, more employment opportunities for women etc. Aim in creating healthy work
relations in the organization and to work towards corporate social responsibility
(CSR) involving employees to contribute to the cause.
Functions of HRM
1. Managerial Functions
a. Planning: Planning is necessary to determine the goals of the organisation and lay-
down policies and procedures to reach the goals. For a human resource manager,
planning involves planning of human resource requirements, recruitment, selection,
and training. It also includes anticipating vacancies, planning job requirements, job
descriptions and determination of the sources of recruitment.
b. Organizing: After planning, HR manager must design and develop organisation
structure to carry out the various operations. For this:
Grouping of personnel activity logically into functions or positions
Assignment of different functions to different individuals
Delegation of authority according to the tasks assigned and responsibilities
involved
Coordination of activities of different individuals.
Organizing helps the organisation in establishing relationships among the employees
so that they can collectively contribute to the attainment of company goals.
c. Directing: After planning and organizing, proper direction should be provided for
proper execution of the plan. Direction function of the HR manager involves
encouraging people to work willingly and effectively for the goals of the enterprise.
Direction is an important managerial function in building sound industrial and human
relations besides securing employee contributions.
d. Controlling: Controlling is concerned with the regulation of activities in accordance
with the plans, which in turn have been formulated on the basis of the objectives of
the organisation. The performance is to be verified in order to know that the personnel
functions are performed in conformity with the plans and directions. Controlling also
involves checking, verifying, and comparing of the actuals with the plans,
identification of deviations if any, and correcting of identified deviations. It also
involves performance appraisal, critical examination of personnel records and
statistics and personnel audit.
2. Operative Functions: The operative functions are those tasks or duties which are
specifically entrusted to the human resource department. These are concerned with:
a. Procurement
b. Development
c. Compensation
d. Integration
e. Maintenance
a. Procurement: It is concerned with obtaining the proper kind and right number of
personnel at the right time and at the most economical rates. It deals specifically with
the determination of manpower requirement, recruitment, selection, induction and
placement.
b. Development: Development of Human Resources is done through the training and
development programme. Development process includes improving the skills and
knowledge, creativity, ability, intellectual ability, capacities of employees.
Development process also moulds and changes the attitude and behavior of the
HRD practices in India have emerged as the dominant topic in the broad area of personnel
management. The Indian approach to HRD (Human Resource Development) can be traced
back to the 1970s when it was articulated by Pareek and Rao. Additionally, L&T in
association with IIM-A reviewed all aspects of its operations.
In 1974, consultants Prof. Udai Pareek and Prof. T.V. Rao studied the organisation and
prepared a new integrated system called the Human Resource Development (HRD) System.
This was probably the first of its kind in India. The new system established the linkages
between the various personnel-related aspects such as performance appraisal, employee
counselling, potential appraisal training, etc. Prof. Pareek and Prof. Rao presented an
approach paper to the top management in the new ideas and this was accepted.
Based on the recommendations of the approach paper, a very high-level role was created at
the Board level to give a greater thrust to the new system. A separate HRD department was
created. A high-level internal team headed by a General Manager monitored the progress of
the implementation of the new system before transferring responsibility to the HRD
department.
It is no secret that employees’ attitudes about their jobs, benefits and employers can vary
greatly, ranging from enthusiastic to negative. Human resource development and
management is culture-sensitive, therefore it is important to examine the recent scenario of
HRD in India context by having a brief preview of HRD scenario in the global context.
An increasing number of employers are assessing the value returned from each penny spent
on their employees. They are targeting specific programmes and practices to the employees
that value them the most and becoming more important than ever. Determining what matters
most to employees and aligning expenditures with priorities is a strategic challenge for the
HRD function. Employees change continuously due to changes in personal preferences.
However, it is not possible to meet the needs of every employee cost-effectively and
practically. Therefore, understanding employees and the issues they face during their jobs
holds the key to the function to respond quickly. Professionals and employees differed on the
relative importance of all factors except one. In some organisations, the HRD function is very
much in tune with what their employees are thinking, while in others the gap may be larger.
HRM is the framework for helping employees develop their skills, knowledge, and
abilities, which in turn improves an organization's effectiveness.
The significant differences between HRM and HRD are discussed in the following points:
The following points will bring out the nature of personnel management:
The scope of personnel management has become wide and is concerned with
organizing human resources with a view to maximize output and profits of the
organization and to develop the talent of the employees at work to the fullest possible
extent securing personal satisfaction (job satisfaction of the employees) and personal
satisfaction (as far as the organization is concerned).
The following are the major differences between Personnel Management and Human
Resource Management:
1. The part of management that deals with the workforce within the enterprise is known
as Personnel Management. The branch of management, which focuses on the best
possible use of the enterprise’s manpower is known as Human Resource
Management.
6. In Personnel Management, the basis of job design is the division of work while, in the
case of Human Resource Management, employees are divided into groups or teams
for performing any task.
8. In PM, the pay is based on job evaluation. Unlike HRM, where the basis of pay is
performance evaluation.
T&D focus: Identifying, assessing and through planned learning- helping develop the
key competencies which enable individuals to perform current or future jobs. Quality
of work life
OD focus: Assuring healthy inter- and intra-personal relationships and helping groups
initiate and manage change.
Organization/Job design focus: Defining how tasks, authority and systems will be
organized and integrated across organization units, and, in individual jobs.
HRP focus: Determining the organization's major HR needs, strategies and
philosophies.
Selection and staffing: Matching people and their career needs and capabilities with
jobs and career paths.
Personnel research and information systems: Assuring a personnel information
base.
Compensation/Benefits focus: Assuring compensation and benefits fairness and
consistency.
The Harvard model has integrated the history and practice of HRM. particularly emphasizing
HRM as a general management function rather than personnel function only. Figure explains
that the HRM policy should evolve taking into consideration stakeholder's interest and
situational factors, which will lead to HRM outcomes, like commitment, congruence and
cost-effectiveness. This ultimately will lead to long-term consequences, like individual well-
being organizational effectiveness and societal well-being which in turn will impact the
stakeholder interest and situational factors and also the HRM policy choices.
Hendry and Pettigrew (1990) argue that better descriptions of structures and strategy making
in complex organizations, and of frameworks for understanding them, are essential
underpinnings for HRM. In Armstrong's (2003) view, Hendry and Pettigrew (1990) believe
that as a movement, HRM expressed a mission, achieve a turnaround in industry. HRM was
in a real sense heavily normative from the outset; it provided a diagnosis and proposed
solutions. Hendry and Fettigrew (1990) further added that, what HRM did at this point was to
provide a label to wrap around some of the observable changes, while providing a focus for
challenging deficiencies-in attitudes, scope, coherence, and direction- of existing personnel
management.
The overall purpose of HRM is to ensure that the organization is able to achieve success
through people. HRM has been defined as a strategic and coherent approach to the
management of an organization's most valued assets-the people working there who
individually and collectively contribute to the achievement of its goals.
The model defines four roles each titled to an outcome of what HR professionals
should deliver (Ulrich, 1997).
Strategic partner-aligns HR practices with business strategies.
Administrative expert-delivers HR practices with efficiency.
Change agent-helps the organization adapt to new conditions.
Employee champion-focuses attention on helping employees, developing competence,
generating commitment and discovering contribution.
All four roles must be played by HR professionals to be effective, yet an individual HR
contributor may be a Master of one role while being only sympathetic to and supportive of
the other three. Some HR leaders may be moving HR towards the strategic and change roles
and ignoring the employee champion and administrative expert roles, which threaten HR
credibility. When the basics are not being done well, strategic impact is short-lived (Ulrich,
Allen, Brockbank, Younger and Nyman, 2009). The business environment and business
conditions have evolved over the years which have also compelled the HR roles to develop
and change. Therefore, keeping abreast the change & evolution, Ulrich et. Al. (2009) in their
Ulrich et al. (2009) have explained that HR professionals as a strategic partner always help
line managers ultimately to reach their goals. Eventually in any organization, the value
creation has to be done mutually by both line and HR managers. The above roles by HR
professionals will create a larger impact in the organization.
Evolution of HRM in India
Though the development of personnel management in UK and USA was largely voluntary, in
India the concept emerged because of the governmental interventions and compulsions. In the
beginning of the 20th century, various malpractices in the recruitment of workers and
payment of wages were prevalent which caused a colossal loss in production due to industrial
disputes. The Royal Commission of Labor in India (1931) under the chairmanship of J.H.
Whitley recommended the abolition of the 'Jobber System' and the appointment of labor
officers in industrial enterprises to perform the recruitment function as well as to look after
the welfare of the employees. After independence, a labor welfare officer was identified as
personnel manager created by legislation under Section 49 of the Factories Act, 1948. The
role of a personnel manager was more of a custodian of personnel policy implementation and
compliance to different acts of the Factories Law. Two professional bodies were formed
namely, Indian Institute of Personnel Management (IIPM) at Kolkata and the National
Institute of Labor Management (NILM) at Mumbai. In 1980s, these two professional bodies
merged together and formed the National Institute of Personnel Management (NIPM),
headquartered at Kolkata.