Scribd
Upload
2 views

Assignment Rubrics

The document outlines a marking scheme for assignments, detailing criteria for evaluation including introduction, identification of issues, analysis, recommendations, conclusion, writing mechanics, and references. Each criterion is categorized into strong, average, and weak performance levels, with corresponding weightings and descriptions. The total score for assignments is a maximum of 50 marks.

Uploaded by

ircpas2.0
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2 views

Assignment Rubrics

The document outlines a marking scheme for assignments, detailing criteria for evaluation including introduction, identification of issues, analysis, recommendations, conclusion, writing mechanics, and references. Each criterion is categorized into strong, average, and weak performance levels, with corresponding weightings and descriptions. The total score for assignments is a maximum of 50 marks.

Uploaded by

ircpas2.0
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Marking Scheme for Assignments

Student Name: Student ID: Subject Code & Name: Lecturer:

CRTERION STRONG AVERAGE WEAK SCORE


Introduction Provide appropriate and influential Provide appropriate and but less influential Provide appropriate and but little influential
connections between issues/ problems and the connections between issues/ problems and connections between issues/ problems and
concepts studied in the course; demonstrates the concepts studied in the course; the concepts studied in the course;
relevant research documents and information. demonstrates limited research documents demonstrates incomplete research
(Weight 5 marks) and information. documents and information.
Identification of the key Identifies and demonstrates understanding of Identifies and demonstrates some Identifies and demonstrates acceptable
problems/issues the main issues/problems understanding of most of the understanding of most of the
(Weight 10 marks) in the case study. issues/problems in the case study. issues/problems in the case study.
Analysis and evaluation of Presents a detail analysis of all identified Presents less detail analysis of all identified Presents superficial analysis of all identified
problems/issues issues/problems; includes all necessary issues/problems; missing some necessary issues/problems; omits necessary
(Weight 10 marks) calculations. calculations. calculations.
Recommendations on suitable Diagnosis and opinions are supported with Diagnosis and opinions are supported with Inappropriate solutions proposed to the
solutions/strategies strong arguments and documented evidence; limited arguments and documented issues in the case study
(Weight 10 marks) interpretation is both reasonable and objective. evidence; interpretation is both reasonable
and objective.
Conclusion Discussion on the relevancy of the case Some discussion on the relevancy of the No discussion on the relevancy of the case
(Maximum 5 marks) case
Writing mechanics and formatting Demonstrates clarity, Conciseness and Demonstrates clarity, Conciseness and No clarity, Conciseness and correctness;
(Weight 5 marks) correctness; appropriate formatting and writing correctness; appropriate formatting; Poor formatting; Occasional grammar and
is free of grammar and spelling errors. Occasional grammar and spelling errors. spelling errors.
References Appropriate literature; flawless citation Appropriate literature; flawless citation Not appropriate literature; flawless citations
according to the Vancouver format, extra according to the Vancouver format do not follow to the Vancouver format
literature used
(Weight 5 marks)
Total Score (Maximum 50)
Comments

You might also like