Flood Relief
Flood Relief
Causes of floods
Floods are caused by many factors or a combination of any of
these –
During times of rain, some of the water is retained in ponds or soil, some
is absorbed by grass and vegetation, some evaporates, and the rest
travels over the land as surface runoff. Floods occur when ponds, lakes,
riverbeds, soil, and vegetation cannot absorb all the water.
Effects of flooding :-
The adverse effects of flooding include:
Flooding has many impacts. It damages property and endangers the lives
of humans and other species. Rapid water runoff causes soil erosion and
concomitant sediment deposition elsewhere (such as further downstream
or down a coast). The spawning grounds for fish and other wildlife habitats
can become polluted or completely destroyed. Some prolonged high
floods can delay traffic in areas which lack elevated roadways. Floods can
interfere with drainage and economical use of lands, such as interfering
with farming. Structural damage can occur in bridge abutments, bank
lines, sewer lines, and other structures within floodways. Waterway
navigation and hydroelectric power are often impaired. Financial losses
due to floods are typically millions of dollars each year, with the worst
floods in recent U.S. history having cost billions of dollars.
In many countries around the world, waterways prone to floods are often
carefully managed. Defences such as detention basins, levees,
bunds, reservoirs, and weirs are used to prevent waterways from
overflowing their banks. When these defences fail, emergency measures
such as sandbags or portable inflatable tubes are often used to try to
stem flooding. Coastal flooding has been addressed in portions of Europe
and the Americas with coastal defences, such as sea walls, beach
nourishment, and barrier islands.
In the riparian zone near rivers and streams, erosion controls measures
can be taken to try to slow down or reverse the natural forces that cause
many waterways to meander over long periods of time. Flood controls,
such as dams, can be built and maintained over time to try to reduce the
occurrence and severity of floods as well. In the United States, the U.S
Army Corps of Engineers maintains a network of such flood control dams.
In areas prone to urban flooding, one solution is the repair and expansion
of human-made sewer systems and stormwater infrastructure. Another
strategy is to reduce impervious surfaces in streets, parking lots and
buildings through natural drainage channels, porous paving,
and wetlands. Areas identified as flood-prone can be converted into parks
and playgrounds that can tolerate occasional flooding. Ordinances can be
adopted to require developers to retain stormwater on site and require
buildings to be elevated, protected by floodwalls and levees, or designed to
withstand temporary inundation. Property owners can also invest in
solutions themselves, such as re-landscaping their property to take the
flow of water away from their building and installing rain barrels, sump pumps,
and check valves.
Property owners may fit their homes to stop water entering by blocking
doors and air vents, waterproofing important areas and sandbagging the edges
of the building. Private precautionary measures are increasingly important
in flood risk management.[1]
When more homes, shops and infrastructure are threatened by the effects
of flooding, then the benefits of protection are worth the additional cost.
Temporary flood defences can be constructed in certain locations which
are prone to floods and provide protection from rising flood waters. Rivers
running through large urban developments are often controlled and
channelled. Water rising above a canal’s full capacity may cause flooding to
spread to other waterways and areas of the community, which causes
damage. Defences (both long-term and short-term) can be constructed to
minimize damage, which involves raising the edge of the water with levees,
embankments or walls. The high population and value of infrastructure at
risk often justifies the high cost of mitigation in larger urban areas.
Floods in India :
The flood comparison studies showed that the highest recorded floods in
India are remarkably comparable with the highest floods reported from
other parts of the world for drainage areas larger than 1000 km". Two
powerful floods recorded in India—the flood of 6 September 1970 on the
Narmada River and the flood of 11 August 1979 on the Machhu River were
found to be record-breaking events in the world.
The weather system that brought unusually heavy rains to eastern and
central Mediterranean was Storm Daniel, a strong mid latitude cyclone that
developed over the Ionian Sea and Greece in early September. Daniel’s
resemblance to a tropical storm in both shape and intensity prompted some
meteorologists to refer to Daniel as a “medicane” (a portmanteau
of Mediterranean hurricane). Daniel was held in place by a blocking high-
pressure system over the Netherlands, whose movement was restricted by
another low-pressure system to its west, which created a weather
phenomenon called an omega block (a configuration that resembles the
Greek letter omega, Ω, on weather maps).
Daniel’s high winds and heavy rains peaked over eastern Libya during the
morning of September 10. Bolstered by warm waters measuring 27.5 °C
(81.5 °F) off the Libyan coast, Daniel generated tropical-storm-force winds
ranging from 43.4 to 49.6 miles (70 to 80 km) per hour, which
downed trees and electrical towers, and drenched coastal cities, producing
flash floods. Across much of the region, cities and towns measured
between 5.9 and 9.4 inches (150 and 240 mm) of rainfall; however, the
highest 24-hour rainfall total, 16.3 inches (414 mm), occurred in Zāwiyat
al-Bayḍāʾ, which is roughly 5 miles (8 km) from the coast in the Akhḍar
Mountains.
Damage
Daniel’s winds and rain produced extensive damage across the southern
Balkan Peninsula, western Turkey, and eastern Libya. The Libyan coastal
city of Derna and its population of more than 100,000 inhabitants,
however, were hardest hit by the effects of the storm. Whereas
rising waters claimed the lives of 4 people in Bulgaria, 7 people in Turkey,
17 people in Greece, and about 170 people in other cities in eastern Libya,
thousands were killed in Derna after the Abu Mansour and Derna (Belad)
dams, which had suffered from years of neglect, failed. The collapse of the
dams sent nearly 7.9 billion gallons (30 million cubic meters) of water
downstream along the Wadi Derna River, which bisects the city. A wave of
reddish mud measuring about 23 feet (7 meters) high struck in the middle
of the night—crushing houses, washing out the lower floors of high-rises,
and sending people, vehicles, and debris into the sea. By some estimates,
the deluge destroyed or heavily damaged at least one-quarter of the city,
leaving about 400 structures submerged in thick mud.
In the days after the disaster, the Libyan Red Crescent reported that 11,300
people had been killed and 10,100 people were missing in Derna alone.
On September 20, however, the UN Office for the Coordination of
Humanitarian Affairs, citing World Health Organisation estimates, revised its
figures downward to 3,958 dead and 9,000 missing in Libya.
Conclusion:
The flood relief efforts, though challenging, showcased the resilience of
the affected communities and the effectiveness of coordinated responses
from various stakeholders. The lessons learned from this experience can
inform future disaster management strategies, emphasizing the
importance of early warning systems, community involvement, and long-
term planning for sustainable recovery. As the region moves forward, it is
crucial to implement the recommendations outlined in this report to build
a more resilient and disaster-prepared community.
End