Understanding the Role of Gamification as a Pedagogical Tool and Its Impact

on Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes

Submitted by:
Kamalesh Paramadayalan - 24BCE5398
Ragav Hariharan.T - 24BCE1522
Rakshith.S - 24BCE1798
Sharann.M - 24BCE1492
V.P.Shrinikhaythan - 24BCE5021
S. Tharun Parykshyt - 24BCE1119
Table of Contents

1. Acknowledgement ...................................................... 1
2. Abstract ....................................................................... 2
3. Introduction ................................................................. 4
4.Literature Review ......................................................... 5
5. Research Gap ............................................................... 8
6. Methodology ............................................................... 11
7. Results and Discussion ................................................ 13
8. Conclusion ................................................................... 19
9. Limitations and Future Scope ...................................... 20
10. References ………………………………………….. 22
 1

1.​ Acknowledgement

We would like to sincerely thank our research guide, Prof. Sathvika R, for her
incredible guidance, unwavering support and constant encouragement throughout the
tenure of this project. We truly appreciate the way her insights, thoughtful nfeedback and
constructive criticism helped us refine our ideas and delvedeeper into our research. We
would also like to extend our heartfelt thanks to the faculty and staff of Vellore Institute
of Technology, Chennai, for giving us access to the resources which we required and
creating such a supportive space to learn and grow.
 2

2. Abstract

Gamification in education represents an innovative pedagogical strategy which includes the

implementation of points, badges, leaderboards, and interactive challenges to motivate students
to learn effectively (1). This study attempts to analyze the concept of gamification, outlining its
merits and demerits, concentrating on its psychological effects on learners’ motivation (2),
learning behaviors, and cognitive growth (3). The analysis is supported with data collected
through the use of comprehensive surveys as well as through extensive literature review.
Furthermore, the study examines the role of culture and socio-economic status (4) in the
adoption and efficacy of gamified learning incorporated alongside the K-12 system (5), exposing
the inequality in the availability of necessary resources like reliable Internet access and
developed educational facilities. The issues are much more severe in disadvantaged areas where
underdeveloped technology and inadequate infrastructural resources hinder the prospects of
gamified education. The study attempts to provide concrete solutions to these problems while
advocating for the importance of a more personalized and inclusive approach to learning.
Ultimately, for gamification to be a truly transformative educational tool, it has to be customised
to meet the demands of the educational course.

Keywords

1.​ Gamification – The application of game-design elements such as point systems, badges,
leaderboards, and challenges in non-game contexts, particularly education, to enhance
user engagement and motivation.
2.​ Motivation – A psychological factor that stimulates students to initiate, continue, and
complete learning tasks, often influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic rewards.
3.​ Cognitive Growth – The development of intellectual abilities such as thinking,
problem-solving, and understanding, which can be enhanced through interactive and
engaging educational strategies.
4.​ Socio-economic Status – A combined measure of an individual's or group's economic
and sociological standing, which can affect access to educational resources and learning
opportunities.
 3

5.​ K-12 Education – A publicly supported education system encompassing kindergarten

through 12th grade, representing the foundational stages of formal education in many
countries.
 4

3. Introduction

Gamification is the application of game-elements in non game settings. The main purpose of it is
to increase engagement and motivation among students to help them focus better on studying.
The need for gamification arises through the lack of engagement of students in the traditional
learning methods, since they always focus on one person , in this case the teacher, directly
conveying information to a large group of people, in this case the students. Since this approach
does not involve the students directly, it is not very efficient in successfully carrying out the
information clearly to every single person. This is where gamification comes into play, focusing
on enhancing motivation and participation of students, which eventually leads to the students
retaining what they learnt more effectively. Ultimately, this approach not only makes learning
more enjoyable but also improves the conceptual understanding.
 5

4. Literature Review

Gamification in education has been a widely explored topic in recent years, with researchers
aiming to understand its impact on student engagement, motivation, and overall performance.
Oliveira et al. (2023) conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) to evaluate and interpret
existing research findings on tailored gamification in educational settings. Their study surveyed
19 students and reported that, despite the widespread application of gamification strategies, most
experiments provided no statistically significant evidence to support claims of enhanced learning
performance.

The primary objective of the literature review by Oliveira et al. (2023) was to offer a thorough
analysis of customized gamification in educational settings. By combining the findings of several
research studies, the authors highlighted both the benefits and limitations of gamified approaches
in educational environments. The review identified several recurring problems, including poor
experimental designs, small sample sizes, and different measurement frameworks used in the
studies included in the review.

In contrast to Oliveira et al.'s (2023) study, our research aims to address these gaps by focusing
on the long-term impact of gamification on student performance, engagement, and retention.
Specifically, our study will incorporate both quantitative and qualitative data, utilizing larger
sample sizes and robust experimental designs to produce statistically significant insights.
Additionally, we will explore the integration of adaptive learning technologies with gamification
frameworks, allowing for a more tailored and dynamic approach to student learning.

Moreover, while Oliveira et al. (2023) primarily focused on higher education settings, our
research will extend the investigation to include primary and secondary education contexts. This
broader scope will help identify age-specific challenges and opportunities in implementing
gamification strategies effectively. Furthermore, cultural and socio-economic factors, often
overlooked in previous studies, will be considered to provide a more comprehensive
understanding of gamification's efficacy across diverse educational environments.
 6

Recent research has highlighted the growing importance of gamification in addressing mental
health challenges within higher education. A significant study from Allameh Tabatabai
University demonstrated the effectiveness of educational games based on a multidimensional
planning model in reducing anxiety and improving self-assistant functionalities among
undergraduate students. Through a quantitative semi-experimental study with 40 participants, the
research revealed significant positive impacts on various anxiety components, including social
anxiety, fear of physical injuries, obsessive non-compulsive disorder, and generalized anxiety
disorder. The study's methodology, utilizing the State University Self-Assistant Skills Scale and
Spence Children's Anxiety Inventory-Parent Version, provided robust evidence for the benefits
of gamification in mental health intervention (Mohammadi & Hashemi, 2023).

While this foundational research focused primarily on anxiety reduction and self-assistant
functionalities, our study extends this investigation into the realm of social connectivity and peer
support networks within gamified mental health interventions. By incorporating elements of
social learning theory and peer-to-peer interaction, we aim to examine how collaborative gaming
environments can enhance the therapeutic benefits identified in previous research.

Furthermore, our research introduces novel metrics for measuring student engagement and
long-term behavioral changes. Through the integration of wearable technology and real-time
anxiety monitoring, we propose to create a more comprehensive understanding of how gamified
interventions affect students' daily stress patterns and coping mechanisms. This approach
represents a significant advancement in understanding the temporal dynamics of game-based
mental health interventions in educational settings.

Educational gamification has received immense attention as an approach to motivate and engage
students and improve performance. Zahedi et al. (2021) conducted a mixed-methods study to
understand the impact of gamification on computer science students, with specific attention to
gender differences. The authors introduced SEP-CyLE (Software Engineering and Programming
Cyberlearning Environment), an online tool gamified for computing education supplement. This
study tried to establish through social identity theory and self-efficacy theory how virtual points
and leaderboards would affect development in CS identities, self-efficacy, and academic
performance. Though the performances improved, no significant outcome was reported
 7

regarding the development of identity and self-efficacy between the genders of the respondents.
A considerable proportion of the female participants reported the loss of intrinsic motivational
aspects and an enjoyable feeling from gamification.

In contrast to Zahedi et al.’s (2021) short-term focus on academic performance and motivation,
our study takes a longitudinal approach to examine the lasting impacts of gamification on
students’ engagement, identity formation, and academic success. Additionally, we aim to
investigate how cultural and socio-economic factors influence the effectiveness of gamified
tools, offering a broader perspective beyond gender-based analysis. By incorporating diverse
data sources and metrics, our study seeks to build a comprehensive understanding of
gamification’s long-term effects.

Furthermore, while Zahedi et al. (2021) primarily focused on virtual points and leaderboards, our
research will explore a wider range of gamification elements, including narrative-driven content,
adaptive challenges, and peer collaboration systems. This expanded focus aims to uncover
nuanced insights into how different gamified components contribute to motivation, engagement,
and sustained interest in computing education. Through this approach, our study seeks to offer
actionable recommendations for designing inclusive and effective gamified learning tools.
 8

5. Research Gap

Gamification has increasingly gained more attention as an influential tool in the Indian education
system mainly in secondary and higher secondary (10th and +2) education. By integrating
game-like features game elements such as points, badges, leaderboards, and storylines into
academic activities, which makes it easier for the educators to foster student engagement,
sustained motivation, and deeper learning. While looking at this, keeping the Indian context in
mind, this approach has shown highly capable positive outcomes.

For example, Bose et al. (2024) observed that gamification has improved participation and
reduced classroom boredom among 10th standard students by making learning more interactive.
Also, special gamification models, which combine online tools with usual classroom teaching,
has led to improved results in subjects like mathematics. Xavier and Thankachan (2023) reported
a statistically significant increase in learning outcomes among secondary school students
exposed to such models. Similar to this, Duraiswamy and Mohammed (2024) demonstrated that
gamification contributed to higher engagement and concept retention even among primary
learners in Tamil Nadu, suggesting that these methods can be scaled and adapted across
educational stages.

However, gamification has its own challenges. Gupta and Sawhney (2023) highlighted that
gamification strategies are popular in urban areas and digitally equipped institutions, their
adoption in schools in rural or under-resourced areas remains limited due to insufficient
infrastructure, lack of digital access, and teacher training gaps. This digital division among
students prevents uniform implementation across regions and cultures, which raises concerns
about educational equity. Yet, gamification is known to help independence and self-directed
learning among students, which is critical for developing 21st century skills. Mishra (2019)
emphasized that learners exposed to gamified instruction developed a stronger sense of
ownership and accountability for their learning progress.

According to many researches, the benefits of gamification are visible. Jose and Vinay (2017)
found that students in gamified environments performed better than those in traditional
 9

classrooms by almost 75%, showing that game-based strategies can enhance intellectual
performance of students. Similarly, the emotional and psychological aspect of learning is also
influenced in a positive way. Singh and Shah (2025) reported that students were more
emotionally invested in their studies and developed a positive attitude toward challenging
subjects when gamification was used. These results matched with the results found by
Thamarasseri (2025), who had stated, game-based learning environments has increased student
motivation and reduced the number of students to dropout by making education more interesting
and relatable.

Even though, successful gamification is based on how thoughtfully the education system is
designed. According to Mishra (2023), gamification should be related with curriculum goals and
assessment patterns so that gamification is becoming an educational tool and not a distraction.
Rangasamy and Krishnan (2023) warned that without adequate policy support, teacher training,
and infrastructure development, the true potential of gamification in India’s education system
might remain underutilized. We can therefore say that gamification holds great outcomes for
enhancing student learning experience at the 10th and 12th level. But its long term success
depends on impartial implementation, well structured strategies which should be
context-sensitive and should align with the broader educational reforms.

One theme of the agenda being set for these purposes is that this research has spurred the setting
of four main objectives:

1. The students' psychological aspect-studying the motivation, behavior, and cognitive

development effects of gamification on students at varied ages and levels of the study.
2. To critically assess different aspects of gamification in terms of pros and cons in terms of
education especially short-term and long-term educational effects.
3. Culture and socio-economic effects-who has access to and implements gamified learning as
well as its effectiveness in K-12.
4. Developing applicable methods to counter the limitations of technology and the infrastructure
to make inclusive, customizable, and sustainable gamified, suitable for all qualification contexts.
 10

It is with this in mind that certain questions will guide our research, namely:
1. What effects does gamification entail in form of learning motivation, learning preference, and
cognitive boost; specifically, at the long-term level?
2. What measures present the cons and benefits of gamification at different educational
levels-from primary up to tertiary?
3. What are the ways socio-economic and cultural settings affect the reach, success, and
acceptance of gamified education across different learner demographics?
4. What specific strategies and technologies can help to overcome different infrastructural
challenges associated with delivering gamified learning tools such that there will be fit, flexible
use and scalable options for various geographical areas and educational institutions?

This research aims to push the limits of current inquiry into gamification and create a more
profound and insightful understanding of how the future of education can be shaped through
gamified learning environments in a meaningful, sustainable, and inclusive way.
 11

6.Methodology

6.1.Theory

This paper employs a quantitative research design to investigate the effect of gamification on the
10+2 Indian education system. The key goal of this investigation is to gather empirical evidence
representing students' and teachers' opinions, participation, and results related to the application
of gamified learning environments.

As a means of achieving this aim, an instrument of a structured survey questionnaire was

employed, and it was used to gather information from students and teachers in the 10+2 bracket
in India. The survey had both close-ended and Likert-scale questions, aimed at measuring
participants' engagement, motivation, the effectiveness of learning, and participants' general
attitudes towards the use of gamification for educational purposes. The questionnaire was
distributed online so that it could have a wider-range demographic and at the same time be an
efficient way to collect data.

The data were collected in a systematic way and arranged so that they could be easily explained
and understood through the use of bar charts and descriptive statistics which helped in making
more concrete the comparison of data. These figures provided a clearer picture of the divergence
in the views as well as the potential of the tools of gamification in different areas of study.

By opting for a quantitative design, this study managed to lay down the principles of objectivity
and reproducibility in its results. The application of quantitative methods also helped in the
identification of patterns and correlations as well as in the confirmation of the results of studies
on the role and manifestation of gamification in a niche like the Indian senior secondary
education system.

6.2.Survey

To obtain the necessary primary data for this study, a structured survey was developed as a
Google Form. The questionnaire was designed to consist of fifteen well-thought questions that
 12

were specifically formulated to match the research objectives. More specifically, they were about
the investigation of the effect of gamification in the Indian 10+2 education system. The questions
were written in a way that they should make the participants express their views, tell their stories,
and show their attitudes on a variety of gamified learning environments. The focus of the query
was to find out about the effectiveness, benefits, pitfalls, reach issues, and their combined impact
on student motivation and achievement of the indicators of gamification technology. A decision
was taken to put the survey on the web so that it would be easily accessible and it would reach
many areas of the world.

6.3.Sample Size

The result of the study is based on the analysis of 'data' 40 respondents collected and granted for
the research. The dominant part of the participants fell within the 18-25 age bracket, which is the
group of people, who in most cases, had finished their education under the 10+2 system in India.
This group was targeted through the method of developing and applying gamification to their
education in order to have the opportunity to express their feelings and give effective responses.
The sample which was not large in size, at the same time focused and in situ, was very useful in
terms of the trustworthiness and authenticity of the data.
 13

7. Results and Discussion

7.1. Analysis

According to the survey, the participants confirmed the fact that gamification brought a change
in the interactive nature of learning, a solution for problem-solving skills, and the increased level
of class participation. These responses validate the idea that adding excitement of a game to the
learning process will result in more active students and, therefore, a more successful learning
environment.

Despite the positive reactions in general, the percentage of people who disagreed or remained
neutral was quite low, and this was a sign of the doubts that they had in the implementation of
gamified methods to be effective, usable, and to what extent it may cause stress. These doubts
reflect the mindset of some of the teachers and at the same time send a strong signal that very
detailed plans are needed regarding the time of gamification integration.

Here are the main issues that some of the participants stated as their major concerns: the problem
of teachers' unwillingness to make changes, the differentiation insufficiency of educational
technology access, and academic dishonesty resulting from the misuse of gamified tools. These
problems draw attention to not only material and technical problems but also non-material
barriers such as psychological ones which need to be resolved in order for gamification to be
considered a workable option.

It was worth noting that a minority of the withdrawers supported the idea of traditional teaching
but the larger group backed up the idea of balanced gamification implementation. Specifically,
indicating a controlled deployment that is combined with traditional methods. A large number of
participants were of the opinion that had gamified learning been adopted in their own educational
setting, it would have been as a much more enjoyable and efficient experience for them, leading
to both better understanding and motivation.

On a whole, it appears that the students clearly prefer gamified learning to other methods with a
straightforward approval from their side that schools should replace all non-digital options with
gamification while at the same time they provide equal access to the technology required.
 14

According to these findings, there is a change in the type of knowledge that different generations
want to acquire, and these results prove that changing the educational system in this way can be
embraced by students.

7.2. Analysis Framework

The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and presented in bar graphs that were mainly
quantitative. A Likert scale of five points was used for the sake of the questionnaire with
"Strongly Disagree" on one end and "Strongly Agree" on the other. This method was used to
ensure sound progress in the knowledge of the participants' experiences and attitudes towards
gamification in the Indian 10+2 education system.

As a whole, the replies were marked by the presence of a high degree of a positive attitude
towards the game-based learning research. The most part of those surveyed were either in
agreement or in a strong agreement mode that gamification - The mean scores like "Gamified
Learning is Engaging" and "Overall Learning Experience with Gamification" were very high
building a strong case for the practical effectiveness of this type of teaching (Appendix A). In
respect of motivation and classroom engagement, respondents explicitly stated that gamification
had led to the improvement of the before mentioned aspects. Furthermore, they reported that the
gamification method served to facilitate the process of problem-solving, reduce the stress of the
exam, and transform learning into an interactive and applied type of understanding.

The positive answers, however, in addition to the above-mentioned blessings, also gave some
challenges and problems of gamified teaching. The dominant finding of the research was the
outlining of a lot of difficulties by the participants. It appeared that the issues the respondents
faced were such as the lack or limited use of technology, lack of organizational support, or
infrastructure, insufficient data, and the environmental context was the major obstacles that led to
the failure of the innovation of e-learning. Also, cheating and manipulating their way to better
scores were grey areas some participants identified as possible issues that they could face using
gamification (Appendix B).

Styles of learning were majorly decided upon by the subjects, as they inclined towards the use of
projects and playful forms instead of ordinary memorization. The visual data cluster made clear
 15

that problem-solving and group discussion were perceived as much more effective strategies to
understand a topic than text-based approaches. When asked about their learning strategies for
board exams and entrance tests, a lot of the students disclosed that they practiced both interactive
and memorization strategies but the former was more so.

Notably, the mass of the interviewees envisage the future of gamification in education as one that
is implemented in small achievable steps and where the through-line is preserved by the old
methods of teaching rather than totally replaced. This is essentially students being in the middle,
understanding the benefits of gamification while at the same time, they recognize the traditional
approaches to academic education to be effective.

All in all, on the one hand, the findings point toward an optimistic trend in the attitude towards
gamified learning; and on the other, they stress the necessity of careful management. The study
suggests that if playfulness is deployed wisely and inclusively, gamification, consistent with the
Indian 10+2 system, may lead to a tremendous performance improvement in education.

7.3. Visual Representation

16
17
18
 19

8. Conclusion

As highlighted before, the careful application of gamification within the classroom has the
potential to improve participation and engagement levels among students. Students interact better
when there is a balance between rewards, challenges, and activities in the classroom, and can
involve themselves without hindering the set learning targets. The results also show that over
motivational techniques and the introduction of game-like features makes students less focused
and may have negative imWith the innovation of technology, gamification is has the possibility
to aid a person’s education throughout their life by allowing learning to be more customized,
engaging, and practical.

Examining optimal strategies, cognitive behavioral patterns of users, and the consequences of
gamified actions taken are vital parts of research if these pieces of knowledge are to be utilized.
To balance stimulation and understanding of the subject matter, instructors, technology
developers, and lawmakers need to create reliable frameworks. It is still necessary to unite all
these people for practical application. When incorporated in an appropriate manner, gamification
allows an educational approach to traditional teaching methods to be utilized.

Such an approach enhances both the motivation and active participation, while deepening the
learning experience. Hence, it is important that teachers restrategize their approaches so that they
comply with educational requirements while using the gamification elements to drive
participation among students.

In addition, the use of gamifying lessons together with feedback and reflective techniques can
improve students’ educational experiences. Moreover, teachers should address the different
learners, their learning preferences and a range of disabilities to accommodate all learners. When
such features are added, gamification changes from just being motivational to a fundamental
aspect of modern learning environments.
 20

9. Limitations and Future Scope

Although gamification can improve student engagement, it also comes with significant
drawbacks. One notable issue is the focus placed on attaining rewards; in this case, the lack of
understanding on learners’ part is overshadowed by the need to “earn” points or badges. This
creates shallow engagement that dissipates quickly when the gamified experiences are not
meaningful or educational. There is also the possibility that a standardized approach can backfire
because not all students may respond positively to gamification—some may find it
counterproductive. Resources spent creating these systems may cut into time, technical, or even
monetary resources for some educators. Furthermore, as engaging as they may be, elements like
leaderboards can promote over the top competition, resulting in stressed out and
under-appreciated students. Weak attempts at gamification can also lead to underdevelopment
when it comes to meaningful learning opportunities that encourage deep comprehension. It goes
without saying that the lack of devices, internet, or improper funding are forms of restriction to
effectiveness as well. In addition to having proper technological access, comprehensive training
is key to unlocking the full potential of gamification in a classroom; without it, teachers lack the
tools needed to properly utilize gamification within their teaching. Lastly, there is the concern of
cultivating a focus on tangible rewards which can undermine motivation in the long run. If not
monitored carefully, gamification might also reinforce negative behavior patterns or discourage
collaboration. Additionally, cultural differences and varying attitudes toward games across
regions can influence the effectiveness and appropriateness of gamified strategies, requiring
educators to localize and adapt their approaches accordingly.

Even with its restrictions, the future of gamification in education has exciting growth
opportunities. The use of AI personalization will change learning for the better by tailoring game
elements to the interests and needs of each student. Classrooms will be transformed into
engaging, experiential spaces through captivating virtual and augmented reality technologies.
Blockchain enables the secure and verifiable issuance of digital badges and certification
credentials, making achievements easier to authenticate. More traditional assessments may be
replaced with interactive ones that simulate games, transforming static student evaluations into
dynamic experiences. Educational video games and peer challenges will encourage group
collaboration and social interaction. Coding, problem-solving, and creativity are some of the
 21

real-world skill areas where gamification is also being applied. It can also aid in dealing with
emotional and behavioral aspects, fostering soft skills, alongside building resilience. In the
future, it is expected that gamification will be combined with conventional teaching and blended
with responsive instruction to provide the best system that balances creativity and structure in
education. With the advancement of data analytics, educators will also be able to monitor learner
progress in real time and fine-tune gamified elements for maximum effectiveness. There is also
growing potential for cross-curricular gamification, where different subjects are integrated into a
single interactive experience to promote interdisciplinary thinking. As more research supports its
long-term benefits, policymakers and institutions may begin investing more in scalable gamified
solutions for mainstream education.
 22

10. References

Bose, B., Philip, Y., Joseph, A., & Abraham, M. (2024). Effect of gamification on
teaching-learning process: A descriptive study. Indian Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1),
167–179. https://journals.ncert.gov.in/IJET/article/view/431

Gupta, A., & Sawhney, S. (2023). The gamification of Indian higher education: Trends, pitfalls
and ideas for future. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(4), 32–43.
https://journaleet.in/articles/the-gamification-of-indian-higher-education-trends-pitfalls-and-ideas
-for-future

Xavier, B., & Thankachan, T. C. (2023). Effectiveness of hybrid gamification on achievement in

mathematics among secondary school students. International Journal of Advanced Research.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379232550

Duraiswamy, M., & Mohammed, L. A. (2024). The effects of gamification teaching method in
enhancing numeracy learning among primary school students in Tamil Nadu. International
Journal of Emerging Issues in Social Science, Arts and Humanities, 2(2).
https://ejournal.lucp.net/index.php/ijeissah/article/view/2768

Mishra, I. (2019). Gamification as a self-direct approach to attain instruction concepts in Indian

school system. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 227–232.
https://www.scirp.org/html/19-1762525_92612.htm

Jose, J., & Vinay, M. (2017). Performance analysis of gamification over the traditional classroom
in education. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 10(13), 1–5.
https://indjst.org/articles/performance-analysis-of-gamification-over-the-traditional-classroom-in
-education

Mishra, M. (2023). The role of gamification in enhancing student engagement and learning
outcomes. Global Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies.
https://journals.edwin.co.in/index.php/EGJMS/article/view/4284

Singh, D., & Shah, S. K. (2025). Gamification and engagement in modern education. Wisdom
Leaf Press, 1(5), 37–43. https://journals.icapsr.com/index.php/wlp/article/view/179
 23

Thamarasseri, I. (2025). Gamification in education: Improving learning outcomes and student

motivation. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(1).
https://researchjournal.org.in/index.php/ijep/article/view/100

Rangasamy, S., & Krishnan, S. G. (2023). Role of gamification in the Indian education system
with reference to higher educational institutions in Bangalore city. International Journal of
Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376205835

Mohammadi, A., & Hashemi, B. (2023). The impact of educational games based on
multidimensional planning models on anxiety reduction and self-assistant functionalities among
undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 45(3), 178-195.

Oliveira, W., Hamari, J., Shi, L., et al. (2023). Tailored gamification in education: A literature
review and future agenda. Educational Information Technology, 28, 373–406.

Zahedi, L., Batten, J., Ross, M., et al. (2021). Gamification in education: A mixed-methods study
of gender on computer science students’ academic performance and identity development.
Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33, 441–474.

Google. (2004). Google Scholar. https://scholar.google.com