The document discusses George Herbert Mead's theory of the self, highlighting the stages of self-awareness and the development of the 'I' and 'Me' aspects through social interactions. It also covers Erving Goffman's dramaturgical approach, which compares life to a theatrical performance, and Urie Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory that outlines how various environmental levels influence a child's development. Additionally, it contrasts individualistic and collectivist cultures in terms of responsibility and social values.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views
Psych Notes Vids
The document discusses George Herbert Mead's theory of the self, highlighting the stages of self-awareness and the development of the 'I' and 'Me' aspects through social interactions. It also covers Erving Goffman's dramaturgical approach, which compares life to a theatrical performance, and Urie Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory that outlines how various environmental levels influence a child's development. Additionally, it contrasts individualistic and collectivist cultures in terms of responsibility and social values.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
MEAD: STAGES OF THE SELF Mead also argued that SELF AWARENESS or
the ability to see ourselves as others see us
PREPARATORY STAGE and react accordingly, is learned. - children imitate people around them Mead argues that the SELF or awareness of SYMBOLS: who we are, has two related aspects. - Gestures, objects and words that First, the ‘I’ aspect. It is our opinion of form basis of human communication ourselves as a whole. We respond the behaviour of others as an ‘I’ alias the PLAY STAGE UNSOCIALIZED SELF. - children develop skill in communicating And second, the ‘Me’ aspect. It is the through symbols and role taking occurs awareness of how others expect us to behave ROLE TAKING: in a given situation. - Process of mentally assuming The ‘Me’ aspect is also called the SOCIAL SELF perspective of another and because it develops through socialization. For responding from that imagined example, if you accidentally put your hand in viewpoint. a fire, then the ‘l’ expresses how you react to the pain. But the ‘Me’ expresses how you GAME STAGE choose to express that pain. And your - children of about 8 or 9 consider several reaction will be conditioned by: First, who you actual tasks and relationships are (male or female, adult or child, etc). simultaneously. Second, where you are (alone, at home, or GENERALIZED OTHERS: public place). Third, who are with (with family, - Attitudes, viewpoints and friends, or strangers.) expectations of society as a whole In conclusion, Mead showed us that in that a child takes into account. relations to other members of society. The MEAD: THEORY OF THE SELF SOCIALIZED SELF or ‘ME’ is constructed highly by the influence of the shared values of the Self begins as privileged, central position in society, where we undergo the socialization a person’s world. process. As the person matures, the self changes and begins to reflect greater concern about DRAMATURGICAL APPROACH ( ERVING reactions of others. GOFFMAN) SIGNIFICANT OTHERS: Irving Goffman's dramaturgical analysis likens - Individuals most important in the life to a theatrical performance, where development of the self. individuals present a "front stage" self to others, shaped by societal values. This contrasts with the "backstage" self shown to THE ‘I’ AND ‘ME’ (GEORGE HERBERT MEAD – 1934) close acquaintances. Impression management Basic human skills need to be taught and occurs as people curate their public personas, learned, similar to advanced social skills. especially evident in social media interactions. George Herbert Mead claimed that how Irving Goffman's theory of symbolic people behave is conditioned by the social interactionism compares life to a theatrical context in which behavior occurs. performance, highlighting how individuals present themselves to others. Our front stage Alex's development is influenced by various self is crafted to create favorable impressions systems, including his microsystem, in social interactions. exosystem, and macrosystem. Each level plays The concept of front stage self illustrates how a crucial role in shaping his experiences and people modify their behaviors to appeal to emotional well-being. others, especially in unfamiliar social settings. The microsystem includes direct interactions This aspect is crucial for building initial that positively or negatively affect Alex's relationships. development. Factors like teacher The backstage self represents a more involvement and family dynamics are critical authentic version of oneself that emerges in to his growth. comfortable relationships, demonstrating The exosystem consists of external influences how familiarity can alter self-presentation that indirectly impact Alex, such as parental over time. job situations. His father's work can cause Impression management is a key strategy anxiety, affecting other aspects of Alex's life. used by individuals to control how they are The macrosystem encompasses broader perceived, often leading to selective self- cultural and economic factors that shape presentation in various contexts, including Alex's upbringing. Being a military child, he social media. faces unique challenges like frequent relocations and cultural adjustments. The timing of events significantly influences a Social Self: Ecological Systems Theory (by: Urie person's development, as experiences can Bronfenbrenner) vary greatly depending on age. Historical and technological contexts further shape A child's development is significantly individual growth and learning styles. influenced by their social relationships and The impact of historical events, such as surrounding environment. The ecological the Great Depression or World War II, can systems theory, developed by alter developmental experiences across Bronfenbrenner, explores these influences different generations. These events leave through various environmental levels. lasting effects on individuals. Bronfenbrenner's theory includes additional Technology plays a crucial role in levels like the exosystem and macrosystem, shaping learning and social skills, with which further elaborate on how broader children today having different social contexts impact a child's growth and experiences than those from previous generations. This technological influence experiences. is significant. The microsystem is the closest level to the Ecological systems theory, developed by Yuri child, involving direct interactions with family, Bronfenbrenner, outlines various peers, and caregivers. It plays a crucial role in environmental levels that interact to influence shaping a child's development. individual development. Each level has a The mesosystem represents the interactions different impact on personal growth. between different parts of the microsystem, such as the relationship between parents and teachers. These interactions indirectly affect the child's overall development. SOCIAL SELF: INDIVIDUALIST – COLLECTIVIST CULTURES
The main distinction between individualistic
and collectivist cultures lies in responsibility. Individualistic cultures emphasize personal freedom and individual rights, while collectivist cultures prioritize group well- being, where the group is accountable for individual actions and welfare. The main difference between individualistic and collectivist cultures is their approach to responsibility. In individualistic cultures, personal freedom and individual rights are prioritized over group welfare. In individualistic cultures, individuals are seen as sovereign entities, responsible primarily for their own actions and decisions. This autonomy fosters a sense of personal achievement and self-reliance Individual rights, equality, and privacy are essential in individualistic societies, shaping their legal systems and social norms. These values contrast sharply with the communal focus of collectivist cultures. Conversely, collectivist cultures emphasize the group's well-being above individual interests. The community is viewed as responsible for the safety and welfare of its members.
United States v. Mark Reiter, Angelo Ruggiero, Vito Loiacono, Raymond Clark A/K/A "Romar," Leonard Rollack A/K/A "Petey," A/K/A "Peter Rollack," A/K/A "Peter Ifill," Timothy Smith A/K/A "Heartbeat," and Alfred Dicks, Mark Reiter, 848 F.2d 336, 2d Cir. (1988)