Paper Publish
Paper Publish
Article Received: 09 Dec 2024 Article Accepted: 12 Dec 2024 Article Published: 31 Dec 2024
Citation
Pranati Katyal, Rajesh Katyal, K.Premkumar, “PV, Wind powered Electric Vehicle Charging Station
with Fuzzy and Perturb & Observe MPPT Control”, Journal of Next Generation Technology (ISSN:
2583-021X), 4(3), pp. 1-14. Dec 2024. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14878993
Abstract
Electric vehicle charging stations that include renewable energy sources have drawn a lot of
interest as a sustainable way to cut greenhouse gas emissions and fulfill the world's expanding
energy needs. This paper presents the design and analysis of a hybrid renewable energy-based EV
charging station powered by PV and wind energy systems. The proposed system employs a dual
MPPT strategy: Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) for PV units and the Perturb and Observe (P&O)
technique for wind turbines, ensuring optimal power extraction under varying environmental
conditions. A detailed performance evaluation highlights the reliability, efficiency, and adaptability
of the system. Simulation results demonstrate the system’s ability to handle partial shading
conditions, wind speed variations, and dynamic EV charging demands. The combination of FLC and
P&O significantly enhances tracking accuracy and response time compared to traditional methods.
This study underscores the feasibility of renewable energy-powered EV charging stations as a
robust, eco-friendly alternative to grid-dependent systems.
Keywords: Electric Vehicle Charging Station (EVCS), Photovoltaic , Wind Energy, Fuzzy Logic
Controller MPPT.
CHAPTER 1
RECTIFIERS AND CONVERTERS
1.1 Introduction
The use of rectifiers in industrial applications started at the era of mercury converters
with the Electro mechanical contact converter. DC machines are common in day to day use.
But the supply that we get from power companies is AC. To use those machines AC supply
has to be turned into DC supply by the use of a rectifier. A rectifier is an electrical device
that converts the incoming AC (alternating current) from a transformer or any other ac
power source to pulsating DC (direct current). Rectifier may be made of diodes, solid
states, vacuum tube, mercury arc valves and other components. All rectifier circuits
may be classified into one of two categories, i) half wave rectifiers and ii) full wave
rectifier. Rectifiers are also used for 3-phase inputs. Rectifiers can further be classified into
two categories i. e. controlled and uncontrolled rectifier.
The dc output always remain constant if ac input voltage is constant in an
uncontrolled rectifier whereas the output voltage can be controlled in a controlled rectifier.
Rectifiers are widely used in nonlinear loads which are connected with distribution systems
which plays an important role in power system network (ex: UPS, discharge lamp,
television, computer, fax machines, ferromagnetic devices, arc furnaces, energy savers
etc.).
A further application of the rectifier is driving a DC motor. Speed control in
DC motor is an important issue. With time the need of flexible speed control for motor is
becoming essential. One way to control the speed of the motor is by varying its input voltage.
1.3 Applications
With the wide spread of electronics and technology the necessary of DC power has
increased as the used of DC electronics has increased over the decades. Here comes an AC-
DC converter in play. With the wide spread of DC power needs, the application of AC-DC
converter has covered a range from milli-watts to megawatts. Some applications of AC-DC
converter is given below.
Use in detection of amplitude modulated radio signal
Use to supply polarized voltage for welding
Use in Uninterruptible power supplies
Use in Induction heating
Use in HVDC power transmission
Use in Variable-frequency drives
Use in Electric vehicle drive Application
Use in vacuum cleaners
Use in Air conditioning
Use in cordless telephone
(b) Full-Wave Rectifier: A full-wave rectifier converts the whole incoming ac wave
so that both halves are used to cause the output current to flow in same direction (either
positive or negative). Full-wave rectification is more efficient because it converts both
polarities of input waveform to DC. A full-wave rectifier circuit requires four diodes instead
(1.1)
When a converter has less than unity power factor, it means that the converter absorbs
apparent power higher than the real power it consumes. This implies that the power source
should be rated with higher VA ratings than the load needs. In addition, the current
harmonics the converter produces deteriorate the power source quality, which eventually
affect the other equipment. The simple solution to improve the power factor is to add a
passive filter, which is usually composed of a capacitor and an inductor. However, this
passive filter is bulky and inefficient since it operates at the line frequency. Therefore, a
power factor correction stage has to be inserted to the existing equipment to achieve a good
power factor. Usually, two types of power factor correction methods are used: The
VAR/harmonics compensation method employs a switch-mode power converter in parallel
with the nonlinear load to supply a reactive power and/or line current harmonics to cancel the
Poor power factor caused by reactive linear circuit elements results as the current
either leads or lags the voltage, depending on whether the load looks capacitive or
inductive.
Less than acceptable power factor typically associated with electronic power
conversion equipment is caused by nonlinear circuit elements.
In most off-line power supplies, the AC-DC front end consists of a bridge rectifier
followed by a large filter capacitor.
Fig.1.6 Traditional poor power factor—the current either leads or lags the voltage
In this circuit, current is drawn from the line only when the peak voltage on the line
exceeds the voltage on the filter capacitor. Since the rate of rise and fall of current is greater
Fig. 1.8 Current drawn from the line only when line voltage exceeds the voltage across the
capacitor
Power factor correction is the method of improving the power factor of a system by
using suitable devices. The objective of power factor correction circuits is to make the input
to a power supply behave like purely resistive or a resistor. When the ratio between the
voltage and current is a constant, then the input will be resistive hence the power factor will
be 1.0. When the ratio between voltage and current is other than one due to the presence of
non-linear loads, the input will contain phase displacement, harmonic distortion and thus, the
power factor gets degraded.
With improvement in the field of semiconductors, the size and weight of control
circuits have drastically reduced. This has also affected their performance and thus power
electronic converters have become increasingly popular in industrial, commercial and
residential applications. However this mismatch between power supplied and power used
cannot be detected by any kind of meter meant for charging the domestic consumers, and
hence, results in direct loss of revenues.
Moreover, since different streets are supplied with different phases, a 3-phase
unbalanced condition may also arise within a housing scheme. The unbalance current flows
in the neutral line of a star connected network causing undesirable heating and burning of the
conductor.
This pulsating current contains harmonics which results in additional losses and
dielectric stresses in capacitors and cables, increasing currents in windings of rotating
machinery (e.g., induction motors) and transformers and noise emissions in many
equipment’s. The rectifier used in the AC input side is the prime source of this problem.
Thus, in order to decrease the effect of this distortion, power factor correction circuits are
added to the supply input side of equipment’s used in industries and domestic applications to
increase the efficiency of power usage.
An active PFC is a power electronic device designed to control the amount of power
drawn by a load and obtains a power factor as close as possible to unity. Commonly any
There are many forms of electromagnetic interference, EMI that can affect circuits
and prevent them from working in the way that was intended. This EMI or radio frequency
interference, RFI as it is sometimes called can arise in a number of ways, although in an ideal
world it should not be present.
EMI - electromagnetic interference can arise from many sources, being either man
made or natural. It can also have a variety of characteristics dependent upon its source and
the nature of the mechanism giving rise to the interference.
By the very name of interference given to it, EMI is an unwanted signal at the signal
receiver, and in general methods are sought to reduce the level of the interference.
One way of categorising the type of EMI is by the way it was created:
Man-made EMI: This type of EMI generally arises from other electronics circuits,
although some EMI can arise from switching of large currents, etc.
Naturally occurring EMI: This type of EMI can arise from many sources - cosmic
noise as well as lightning and other atmospheric types of noise all contribute.
Continuous interference: This type of EMI generally arises from a source such as a
circuit that is emitting a continuous signal. However background noise, which is
continuous may be created in a number of ways, either manmade or naturally
occurring.
Impulse noise: Again, this type of EMI may be man-made or naturally occurring.
Lightning, ESD, and switching systems all contribute to impulse noise which is a
form of EMI.
Broadband: There are many forms of broadband noise which can be experienced. It
can arise from a great variety of sources. Man-made broadband interference can arise
from sources such as arc welders where a spark is continuously generated. Naturally
occurring broadband noise can be experienced from the Sun - it can cause sun-outs for
satellite television systems when the Sun appears behind the satellite and noise can
mask the wanted satellite signal. Fortunately these episodes only last for a few
minutes.
Radiated: This type of EMI coupling is probably the most obvious. It is the type of
EMI coupling that is normally experienced when the source and victim are separated
by a large distance - typically more than a wavelength. The source radiates a signal
which may be wanted or unwanted, and the victim receives it in a way that disrupts its
performance.
o Common mode: This type of EMI coupling occurs when the noise appears in
the same phase on the two conductors, e.g. out and return for signals, or +ve
and -ve for power cables.
o Differential mode: This occurs when the noise is out of phase on the two
conductors.
Inductive coupling: What is normally termed inductive coupling can be one of two
forms, namely capacitive coupling and magnetic induction.
Capacitive coupling: This occurs when a changing voltage from the source
capacitive transfers a charge to the victim circuitry.
Magnetic coupling: This type of EMI coupling exists when a varying magnetic field
exists between the source and victim - typically two conductors may run close
together (less than λ apart). This induces a current in the victim circuitry, thereby
transferring the signal from source to victim.
By determining the form of coupling that exists and the way in which it is reaching
the victim, it may prove to be that the most effective method of reducing the EMI is by
putting measures in place to reduce the coupling and reduce the level of interference to an
acceptable level.
2.1 Introduction:
The charger in 7 requires a four switch AC-DC converter for PFC operation and a full bridge
DC-DC converter for CC/CV mode charging operation. The PFC controller is designed with
battery voltage and current references i.e. by making the control circuit more complex. A
level 2 charger combining bridgeless boost PFC converter as front-end converter and isolated
phase shifted full bridge DC-DC converter is presented in 8.To obtain high density and high-
Smart Homes and Smart Grid based operation modes for EV is described in 9.Usually,
two modes of power transfer occur between EV and Grid i.e. Grid to Vehicle and Vehicle to
Grid. The literature proposes additional two modes namely Vehicle for Grid and home to
Vehicle. A Vehicle to Home operation is proposed. In H2V mode, the charger current is
operation is aimed for the reactive power compensation in the home itself with the utilization
of the vehicle charger. In V2H mode, the vehicle supplies power to a single home unlike in
V2G mode where the vehicle is supposed to supply power to the grid. A 3.6 kW charger
prototype is developed with bi-directional power flow capabilities to achieve all modes of
operations.
In10 an on-board battery charger for the electric scooter is developed. The charger is
designed for a lead-acid battery of 180 V and 12 Ah and the charger can charge the battery
from a 110 V, 60 Hz, single phase outlet. The concept of low voltage DC-DC converter
Unity power factor and tight output voltage regulation are achieved with the very
well-known two stage approach, showing Fig.2.1. Since the power stage is composed by two
converters, size, cost and efficiency are penalized, mainly in low power applications.
However, this is probably the best option for ac-DC converters due to the following reasons.
3) It offers many possibilities to implement both the isolation between line and load, and the
hold-up time.
4) The penalty on the efficiency due to the double energy processing is partially compensated
by the fact that the voltage on the storage capacitor is controlled. The fact of having a
constant input voltage allows a good design of the second stage.
Although unity power factor is the ideal objective, it is not necessary for meeting the
Regulations. For example, both IEEE519 and IEC 1000-3-2, allow the presence of harmonics
in the line current1. This fact has led to the publication of great number of papers in the last
years, proposing solutions that obtain some advantages over the two stage approach. Some of
these circuits are practical but others are too complex to be worth changing.
The purpose of this paper is to classify and compare several converters proposed for
the ac–dc conversion with power factor correction, having the two stage approach as a
reference and focusing the study in the low power range.
The need for power electronics having greater compactness, better manufacturability,
and higher performance motivates pursuit of dramatic increases in switching frequencies.
Increases in switching frequency directly reduce the energy storage requirements of power
converters, improving achievable transient performance and — in principle — enabling
miniaturization and better integration of the passive components. Realizing these advantages,
however, requires devices, passive components, and circuit designs that can operate
efficiently at the necessary frequencies6.
The performance and size of power converters are important for many applications.
Achieving small size and high-performance is particularly challenging in high-voltage and
low-power applications (e.g., voltages up to a few hundred volts and powers up to several
tens of watts). In this paper, we explore improved design in this voltage and power range,
with a focus on LED driver circuits as an important application in this space. Light emitting
diode devices promise unprecedented reductions in energy consumption in comparison to
incandescent and fluorescent lights, but come with an as-yet unmet demand for high power
density, high efficiency, and high-power-factor LED driver circuitry 8.
Converters having this architecture may be realized for operation either from wide-
range (e.g., 25–200 V) dc voltage or from a rectified 120 Vrms ac voltage.
Recently published academic designs are harder to fully evaluate and compare
because of large variation on LED output configurations (e.g., separation to multiple LED
loads or diverse LED voltage specifications), but appear to provide generally similar
performance with moderate improvements in individual aspects8. Overall, the volume of the
converters was uniformly dominated by magnetic components, and in each case the driver
circuit represented a major contribution to the LED system size. These examinations indicate
that power electronics continues to be a significant limitation in solid-state lighting and that
3.1 Introduction
The Electric Vehicle can be charged from a suitable outlet via an OBC the AC-DC
converter or rectifier is the first stage of an OBC which converts the available AC supply into
DC.A constant voltage with less ripple at the output terminals of the AC-DC converter is
desired which can be further utilized by the load or any other converter. Most common
rectifier topology is Diode bridge rectifier with capacitive filter and phase controlled
rectifiers. The first one is preferred for low power applications where the later one is for high
One most serious issue with the conventional rectifiers is the harmonics components
of the line current which are responsible for distorting the voltage at the point of common
coupling due to source inductance and produce some undesirable effects. Due to the presence
of harmonics, the power factor becomes worst. The effect of low PF and high THD are
Power factor (pf) simply defined as the ratio of real power to apparent power. The
instantaneous product of voltage and current over one complete cycle gives the real power
where the product of RMS voltage and RMS current gives the apparent power.
The cosine of the angle between voltage phasor ad current phasor is defined as PF.
But this definition is not valid everywhere, especially at nonlinear loads. The definition is
limited up to resistive, inductive, or capacitive loads 15. Consider a non-linear load connected
with a sinusoidal voltage source. The voltage and current can be expressed as v (t) and i (t).
Power factor can be expressed as the product of displacement factor and distortion factor.
The displacement factor can be defined as the cosine of angle between fundamental
The distortion factor can be defined as the ratio of fundamental component of current to the
Power factor can be defined as the product of displacement factor and distortion factor.
pf =𝑘𝑑×𝑘∅
When the fundamental component of current is in phase with the voltage, the displacement
via line impedance of the power system and the distorted voltage cause malfunction in
required amount of power. Harmonic current add to the fundamental and result in
increased current which in turn increases the losses in distribution transformer and AC
machines. Due to additional loss machines undergo overheating and cannot be used
Large neutral current flows in the power system due to triple harmonics.
At low pf, the load draws more current and the loss in the converter and the
The Reactive power increases which increase the rating of the electrical components
Due to the adverse effects of the harmonics, various agencies have adopted standards
i.e. the maximum allowable harmonic current that can be injected into the power system by
Table 1
IEC stands for International Electro technical Commission and enforced in Europe. It
defines a limit for current harmonics of equipment with a maximum input current of 16 A.
The standard applies to both single phase, and three phase equipment, and the frequency may
IEEE Standard:
According to IEEE, the current harmonics are measured by the ratio of load current to
the short circuit current. This ratio can also define as the ratio of load kVA to short circuit
kVA at PCC.
The voltage harmonics distortion on the power system is limited to 5 % THD with
voltage rating up to 69 kV and the current harmonics depend on the short circuit capacity of
One of the commonly used AC-DC converters is a diode bridge rectifier for low
power applications. Fig 2.1(a) shows a diode bridge rectifier without any filter. The operation
of the converter is very simple. Diagonal diodes 𝐷1 and 𝐷2 conduct for positive half cycle
of the supply voltage and similarly diodes 𝐷3and 𝐷4 conducts for negative half of the
supply voltage. The rectifier behaves as a pure resistive load to the input AC source and, the
input current is in phase with the voltage, providing unity power factor operation.
(b)
Fig 3.1 Diode bridge rectifier (a) power stage diagram (b) output voltage
In most cases the output of the rectifier is a DC-DC converter which accept an input
DC voltage of a ripple within permissible limit. To reduce the ripple of the output voltage
voltage, filters are added to the conventional rectifier. A capacitive filter is one of the basic
filters and widely used one. Fig 2.2(a) shows a diode bridge rectifier with C filter. Usually,
the value of the capacitor is decided by the amount of allowable ripple in output voltage.
(b)
Fig 3.2 Diode rectifier with C filter (a) power stage diagram(b)output voltage(c)input
As shown in Fig 3.2 (b) the voltage is having a ripple of 60 V peak-to-peak. The ripple
can be minimized further by increasing the value of filter capacitor. The input current is not
sinusoidal, but it contains harmonics that can be verified from the FFT of the input current in Fig
3.3(a).The input current is discontinuous i.e. the diagonal diodes does not conduct for the entire
half cycle of the supply. With the increase in the capacitance value, the conduction period of the
diodes decreases and the input current peak increases with the increase in THD. The reason for
(b)
Fig 3.3 Diode rectifier with C filter (a) input current FFT analysis (b) rectified voltage
capacitor voltage and input current (input current is magnified by ten times for better
visibility)
Fig 3.3(b) shows the steady state capacitor voltage and input current waveform. The
rectified voltage without any filter is shown in green colour. When the input voltage or
rectified voltage less than the voltage across capacitor the diodes are reverse biased and no
current flows into the converter and the load current is supplied by the capacitor. When the
capacitor draw charging current from the supply for a short duration. When the supply
voltage is less than the capacitor voltage simultaneously the four diodes, get reverse biased. If
the capacitor tends to infinity, the input current is an impulse current only. The power factor
of the converter is 0.657, and the THD is 144.5% which exceeds the standards.
inductor is very large as compared to the capacitor, the rectifier operates in CCM. The large
inductor does not allow a sudden change in current and hence the inductor current is constant.
The constant inductor current is supplied by the input diode rectifier with at least two diodes
conducting. The input current is in phase with the input voltage. Hence the displacement factor is
unity. However, the shape of current is not sinusoidal hence by introduces THD. In
Discontinuous Conduction Mode the inductance value is small as compared to the capacitor. Due
to the presence of inductor the input current width increases and inductor smoothens the current.
Several LC branches can be connected as a filter, and harmonic trap filter can be
implemented at the input side with a series branch of RLC. With the addition of inductor on the
output side of the diode rectifier the THD and PF improves. The results are shown in Fig 3.4.
(a)
Fig 3.4 Diode rectifier with LC filter (a) input current (b) FFT of input current(L= 20 mF and
C=200μF)
The THD reduces from 144 % to 74 % with the addition of filter inductance. With the
increase in L value, the THD decreases and at the same instance the output voltage decreases and
to maintain the desired output voltage another DC-DC converter with boost operation is
necessary. The THD gets better with the harmonic trap filter at the input side. Fig 3.5 shows a
graph between Inductance and THD. With infinite inductance, the pf cannot reach more than
0.917.
Passive filters cannot make power factor more than 0.75 and only applicable for low
power applications. Some disadvantages of passive filters are size, high THD, low pf, unwanted
resonance. Due to the disadvantages, active techniques are adopted at high power levels.
Due to various limitations of passive PFC techniques and to achieve unity power
factor with very less THD active PFC techniques are implemented. Various switching
converter topologies are used to force the input current to follow the shape of input voltage
thus by reducing the harmonics and improving the PF. With the implementation of active
PFC, the AC-DC converter behaves like a resistive load and draws sinusoidal input current.
Active PFC devices produce less ripple voltage and the size of reactive elements much
The block diagram shows a basic AC-DC converter with power factor correction. The
Diode rectifier is suitable only for unidirectional power flow i.e. Grid to Vehicle in the case
of an On-Board EV charger. To achieve bi-directional power flow in G2V and V2G manner,
the diode is replaced by IGBT or MOSFET and the rectifier can operate as an inverter in
voltage requirement. Buck converter produce an output voltage lower than input supply
voltage whereas Boost converter produces a voltage higher than the supply voltage at the
output terminals. The output voltage can be higher or lower than the supply voltage in the
case of a Buck-Boost converter, but the component stress of Buck-boost converter is double
to that of Buck or Boost topology hence it is not recommended. The DC-DC converter stage
can be an isolated converter i.e. fly back or forward which can provide galvanic isolation
between the Grid and EV. Depending on the operation of these converters in CCM or DCM
reaches zero in each switching cycle whereas a continuous inductor current never touches
zero and have less ripple. Only in the case of Boost converter the input current is continuous
and in Buck and Boost it is discontinuous because of the interruption of the switch in each
switching cycle.
supply voltage is first rectified by a diode bridge rectifier and a Boost converter added at the
The line voltage is converted into a rectified DC voltage via Diode rectifier before the
Boost converter. The input voltage to the Boost converter is the rectified voltage which
varying from zero to peak value of the supply voltage. The pulsating input DC voltage can be
assumed as a constant DC voltage source for the analysis and operation of the Boost
converter purpose. The Boost converter circuit configuration with both ON and OFF interval
(a)
(b)
Fig 3.8 (a) Boost converter and equivalent circuit during (b) ON interval (c) OFF interval
Fig 3.8 describes the ON and OFF interval circuit model of Boost converter. During
the time interval, 0≤t≤DTs the Boost switch SB is turned ON by gate pulse, where D is the
duty cycle Ts and is the switching period which is reciprocal of switching frequency. At this
interval, the boost inductor LB gets short-circuited via switch and input voltage V RECT .The
boost diode is reverse biased, and the load is supplied by the DC link capacitor. The inductor
During the interval DT, ≤t≤T, the switch is turned OFF while the boost diode is forward
biased. The load is connected across the supply via the inductor. The OFF stage of the circuit
is shown in Fig 3.8I. The dynamic equations of the inductor current and capacitor current can
be written as
into three types i.e. Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM), Discontinuous Conduction Mode
(DCM) and Critical Conduction Mode (CrCM) or Boundary Conduction Mode (BCM).
In CCM, the inductor current never reaches to zero. From Eq. 3.8 and 3.10 it can be
observed that the inductor current increases during ON time and decreases during OFF time.
During OFF time, there is a possibility of DCM if the inductor current reaches to zero. The
advantages of CCM is the higher efficiency of the converter and low current stress on
components. However, the disadvantage is a separate current controller is necessary for input
current shaping so that the input current will follow the input voltage.
In DCM, the inductor current goes to zero in OFF interval if each switching cycle.
The voltage and current stress on power devices are more in DCM but DCM has an
advantage of inherited wave shaping of the input current. No separate current controller is
required in case of DCM for input current shaping. In DCM, the inductor current is just
discontinuous.
The simulated inductor current waveform of both CCM and DCM mode are shown in
Fig 3.9.The DCM provides a sinusoidal input current whereas the input current in case of
CCM is non-sinusoidal and needs a further current controller. For CCM operation, the boost
inductance is taken as one mH whereas for DCM operation the inductance is chosen as
20𝜇H.
(b)
Conclusion: This chapter explored the front-end AC-DC conversion process in electric
vehicle (EV) chargers, discussing various rectifier topologies and their impact on power
quality. The limitations of conventional diode bridge rectifiers, including high harmonic
distortion and low power factor, were analyzed. Passive power factor correction (PFC)
techniques, such as capacitor and LC filters, were reviewed for their ability to reduce
harmonics, though they come with drawbacks such as increased component size and limited
effectiveness.
4.1 INTRODUCTION
The overarching principle involves controlling the input current drawn from the mains
input to achieve the required current shape for low THD and high power factor. The power
supply must provide a regulated dc output voltage and for many applications, galvanic
isolation is also required. The basic boost or step-up converter 4 forms the core of most
architectures as it has an input inductor that allows input current control to be readily
achieved. The well-known fly back converter can be derived from the buck-boost converter,
but with a transformer for output voltage isolation4.
Traditionally for PFC supplies, fly back converters have been used for lower power
levels (≤100 W). For higher power levels (≥500 W), a separate boost converter for PFC and
separate dc to dc converter with transformer isolation for output dc voltage regulation is used.
To overcome the above PQ issues, the conventional boost and buck-boost PFC
converters are incorporated at the front end, between DBR and dc-link capacitor as shown in
Fig. 4. 2. However, the addition of an extra converter in charger, adds to the number of total
components. This affects the cost and size of the charger, which restricts the efficiency and
reliability of the charger with increased weight. Therefore, single stage isolated ac–dc
converters with input DBR are more widely used in PFC applications at high-power rating 3.
Fig. 4.3. Basic Luo converter. (a) Elementary non isolated negative output Luo converter
circuit. (b) Elementary isolated positive output Luo converter circuit
The configuration of the EV charger with modified Luo converter is shown in Fig.
4.4. The design of this isolated converter is selected to provide a discontinuous conduction
mode (DCM)-based operation. This ensures the intrinsic PFC characteristics of the charger
over the entire variation of input voltage. The converter consists of two PFC switches S1 and
S2 and clamping diodes D1 and D2 at the primary side of the high frequency transformer
(HFT). The secondary of the transformer is connected to output diode Do, intermediate
Fig. 4.4. Proposed modified negative output Luo converter fed EV charger with reduced
switch voltage.
The design of modified Luo converter is selected to operate in DCM as the current
through the HFT magnetizing inductance Lm becomes discontinuous over a complete
switching cycle. Different modes of operation associated with proposed converter
corresponding to the three switching durations are discussed as follows.
Mode-I: During this mode, both switches S1 and S2 are made on. The magnetizing
inductor starts storing the energy from supply as the current through this rises linearly. The
inductor Lo starts charging through the intermediate capacitor C1 as the capacitor voltage
starts decreasing through Lo, during this instance as shown in Fig. 4.5(a). The diode Do
remains in reverse bias at the secondary side. Under steady state, considering magnetizing
inductor current as iLm, output inductor current as iLo, the intermediate capacitor voltage as
vc1, and dc link capacitor voltage as vo = vco, the inductor voltage and capacitor currents are
written as follows:
Mode-II: Fig. 4.5(b) represents Mode-II, when both the PFC switches S1 and S2 are
turned off. During this interval, the diodes D1 and D2 come into conduction. The
magnetizing inductance Lm provides the stored energy to the output diode Do, and it starts
conducting. The intermediate capacitor voltage vC1 starts increasing through the energy of
the magnetizing inductance at the HFT secondary winding. The energy is transferred to the
output capacitor through the output inductor Lo, and the required charging current is supplied
to the battery. During this instant, the voltage across the magnetizing inductor and output
inductor as well as the capacitor currents is expressed as follows:
Mode-III: In this period, both the diodes (D1, D2) are reverse biased and pulses to the
PFC switches (S1, S2) are made off. The converter enters DCM operation as the energy
stored in Lm is depleted completely. The diode Do becomes reverse biased. The required
energy for the battery is provided by the dc-link capacitance through the inductor Lo and the
energy transfer capacitor, C1, as shown in Fig. 4.5(c). The key switching phenomena over the
complete switching cycle associated with the circuit components are depicted in Fig. 4.5(d).
During DCM operation, the inductor voltage and capacitor current are expressed as follows:
This results in the dc voltage gain of the proposed Luo converter, the expression of which is
given as
During mode II, the peak voltage across the primary switches S1, 2 are obtained as follows:
Note that the voltage stress across the primary switches S1, 2 is clamped to input
voltage due to the use of clamping diodes at the primary. This stress is lower than the
conventional isolated Luo converter case which incurs a maximum voltage stress of Vin+
nVo
Conclusion: This chapter explored the design and operation of a Modified Luo Converter
for power factor correction (PFC) in electric vehicle (EV) chargers. The limitations of
conventional rectifiers and PFC converters were analyzed, highlighting their inefficiencies in
power quality and component stress. The Modified Luo Converter was introduced as an
improved solution, offering better voltage regulation, reduced harmonic distortion, and
improved power factor. By operating in Discontinuous Conduction Mode (DCM), the
converter minimizes switching losses and enhances efficiency. The detailed analysis of its
working modes, voltage conversion ratio, and voltage stress on components demonstrates its
advantages over traditional PFC converters. This research paves the way for further
optimization and implementation of high-efficiency power conversion systems in EV
charging infrastructure.
The name MATLAB stands for Matrix Laboratory. MATLAB was written originally
to provide easy access to matrix software developed by the LINPACK (linear system
package) and EISPACK (Eigen system package) projects.
It has powerful built-in routines that enable a very wide variety of computations. It
also has easy to use graphics commands that make the visualization of results immediately
available. Specific applications are collected in packages referred to as toolbox. There are
toolboxes for signal processing, symbolic computation, control theory, simulation,
optimization, and several other fields of applied science and engineering.
Fig 5.4 HF primary voltage, current and secondary voltage and current
Figure 5.2 displays the input voltage and current waveforms of the converter. The
source voltage is likely a DC or AC input, and the current waveform shows how the
converter draws current from the source.
Figure 5.3 shows the rectified voltage waveform, which is the output of the
rectification stage in the converter. If the input is AC, this waveform would represent the DC
voltage after rectification. If the input is DC, it might show further processing of the DC
signal.
Figure 5.4 depicts the high-frequency (HF) waveforms on the primary and secondary
sides of a transformer (if present) in the converter. It likely shows the voltage and current
waveforms for both the primary (input) and secondary (output) sides of the transformer.
Fig 5.5Zoomed-in view of the waveforms shown in . It provides a more detailed look
at the high-frequency voltage and current waveforms on both the primary and secondary
sides of the transformer.
Figure 5.7 displays the power factor of the source. The power factor is a measure of
how effectively the converter draws power from the source, with a value close to 1 indicating
high efficiency.
[7] C. Zhao, J. Zhang, and X. Wu, “An improved variable on-time control strategy for a CRM
fly back PFC converter,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 915–919, Feb.
2017.
[8] J. W. Shin, S. J. Choi, and B. H. Cho, “High-efficiency bridgeless fly back rectifier with
bidirectional switch and dual output windings,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 9,
pp. 4752–4762, Sep. 2014.
[9] C.-P. Tung and H. S.-H. Chung, “A fly back AC/DC converter using power
semiconductor filter for input power factor correction,” in Proc. IEEE Appl. Power Electron.
Conf. Expo., Long Beach, CA, USA, 2016, pp. 1807– 1814.
[11] K. Mino et al., “Novel bridgeless PFC converters with low inrush current stress and high
efficiency,” in Proc. Int. Power Electron. Conf.—ECCE ASIA, Sapporo, Japan, 2010, pp.
1733–1739.
[12] M. Alam, W. Eberle, and N. Dohmeier, “An inrush limited, surge tolerant hybrid
resonant bridgeless PWM AC-DC PFC converter,” in Proc. IEEE Energy Convers. Congr.
Expo., Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2014, pp. 5647– 5651.
[14] H. S. Athab, D. Dah-Chuan Lu, A. Yazdani, and B. Wu, “An efficient single-switch
quasi-active PFC converter with continuous input current and low DC-bus voltage stress,”
IEEE Trans. Ind Electron., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1735–1749, Apr. 2014.
[15] S. W. Lee and H. L. Do, “A single-switch AC-DC LED driver based on a boost-fly back
PFC converter with lossless snubber,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 1375–
1384, Feb. 2017.
[16] J. I. Baek, J. K. Kim, J. B. Lee, H. S. Youn, and G. W. Moon, “A boost PFC stage
utilized as half-bridge converter for high-efficiency DC-DC stage in power supply unit,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 7449–7457, Oct. 2017.
[17] M. A. Bakar and K. Bertilsson, “An improved modelling and construction of power
transformer for controlled leakage inductance,” in Proc. IEEE 16th Int. Conf. Environ. Elect.
Eng., Florence, Italy, 2016, pp. 1–5.
[21] H. Wu, Y. Lu, T. Mu, and Y. Xing, “A family of soft-switching DC-DC converters
based on a phase-shift-controlled active boost rectifier,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol.
30, no. 2, pp. 657–667, Feb. 2015.