Data (3)
Data (3)
1 $65,487 0 27 12 1 44
2 $46,184 3 20 4 0 1
3 $32,782 1 0 7 0 0
4 $54,899 5 12 8 1 0
5 $34,869 5 7 4 1 1
6 $35,487 2 8 2 1 2
7 $26,548 1 5 0 0 2
8 $32,920 3 15 9 1 4
9 $29,548 6 5 1 0 0
10 $34,231 2 6 6 0 3
11 $23,654 0 0 0 1 2
12 $39,331 3 9 6 1 1
13 $36,512 6 6 4 1 2
14 $35,467 6 3 6 1 3
15 $68,425 2 25 12 0 1
16 $35,468 5 9 4 1 5
17 $36,578 4 4 8 0 8
18 $39,828 6 18 5 1 5
19 $36,487 5 6 2 0 3
20 $37,548 9 19 4 0 6
21 $31,528 11 3 3 0 6
22 $34,632 4 5 4 0 0
23 $46,211 5 14 6 1 5
24 $29,876 0 2 3 1 5
25 $43,674 9 6 4 0 2
26 $38,985 7 18 9 0 5
27 $53,234 0 25 6 0 3
28 $51,698 6 18 6 0 1
29 $41,889 16 22 7 0 7
30 $38,791 4 21 5 0 9
31 $69,246 3 22 10 0 45
32 $48,695 19 6 8 0 40
33 $34,987 6 9 2 1 3
34 $28,985 1 0 4 1 4
35 $35,631 4 6 4 0 2
36 $54,679 3 20 6 1 4
37 $39,743 6 9 5 1 1
38 $41,255 4 9 6 0 4
39 $36,431 4 9 4 1 2
40 $26,578 6 0 2 1 2
41 $47,536 5 15 6 0 4
42 $36,571 1 6 4 0 2
43 $56,326 3 12 8 0 6
44 $31,425 6 7 5 1 6
45 $24,749 2 6 0 1 1
46 $26,452 3 1 2 1 0
s Department Interaction
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 15
1 5
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 18
0 0
0 0
1 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 18
0 0
0 0
1 22
1 21
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 6
0 0
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.940575
R Square 0.884682
Adjusted R Square 0.863439
Standard Error 4064.677
Observations 46
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 7 4.82E+09 6.88E+08 41.64619 6.615E-16
Residual 38 6.28E+08 16521598
Total 45 5.44E+09
Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%
Intercept 23693.09 1995.36 11.87409 2.345E-14 19653.7 27732.49 19653.7
Years Previous Experience 184.564 185.437 0.995292 0.32589 -190.8335 559.9615 -190.8335
Years Employed 905.2522 120.1523 7.534205 4.711E-09 662.0165 1148.488 662.0165
Years Education 1528.154 294.178 5.194659 7.217E-06 932.6221 2123.686 932.6221
Gender -1232.632 1275.303 -0.96654 0.339885 -3814.348 1349.085 -3814.348
Number Supervised 94.13519 71.91155 1.309041 0.198381 -51.44213 239.7125 -51.44213
Sales Department -297.3754 2462.258 -0.120773 0.904507 -5281.957 4687.206 -5281.957
Interaction -718.2988 194.4771 -3.693489 0.000693 -1112 -324.6006 -1112
RESIDUAL OUTPUT
Salary
0$20,000
2 4 6 8 101214161820
$60,000
Gender Line Fit Plot
Predicted Salary
Years Previous
$0 Experience
$40,000 $80,000 Salary
Salary
0 $20,000
5 10 15 20 25 30
$60,000 Number Supervised Line Fit
Predicted Salary
Years$0
Employed
$40,000 Plot Salary
Salary
0 $20,000
2 4 6 8 10 12 14
$100,000
Sales Department Line Fit
Predicted Salary
Years$0
Education Plot Salary
0 $50,000 Interaction Line Fit P Predicted Salary
Salary
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
$100,000
Upper 95.0% Gender
$0 Salary
$80,000
0 $50,000 Predicted
Salary
27732.49 5 101520253035404550
$60,000
559.9615 Number $0Supervised
$40,000
Salary
1148.488 0$20,000
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
2123.686 Sales Department
$0
1349.085 0 5 10 15 20 25
239.7125 Interaction
4687.206
-324.6006
t
ed Line Fit
Salary
artment Line Fit
Predicted Salary
Plot Salary
teraction Line
Predicted Fit Plot
Salary
Salary
04550 Predicted Salary
Salary
4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Predicted Salary
artment
0 5 10 15 20 25
Interaction
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.918304
R Square 0.843283
Adjusted R Square 0.819173
Standard Error 4677.294
Observations 46
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 6 4.59E+09 7.65E+08 34.97607 3.219E-14
Residual 39 8.53E+08 21877078
Total 45 5.44E+09
Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%
Intercept 26861.52 2073.071 12.95735 1.036E-15 22668.33 31054.7 22668.33
Years Previous Experience -59.58865 199.3672 -0.298889 0.766612 -462.8468 343.6695 -462.8468
Years Employed 668.2667 116.8966 5.716734 1.281E-06 431.821 904.7123 431.821
Years Education 1600.986 337.7543 4.740091 2.834E-05 917.8135 2284.159 917.8135
Gender -1906.371 1452.424 -1.312544 0.197009 -4844.176 1031.434 -4844.176
Number Supervised 137.3619 81.64661 1.682396 0.100483 -27.78394 302.5078 -27.78394
Sales Department -7544.208 1711.845 -4.407062 7.962E-05 -11006.74 -4081.674 -11006.74
RESIDUAL OUTPUT
Salary
0$20,000
2 4 6 8 101214161820
$60,000
Gender Line Fit Plot
Predicted Salary
Years Previous
$0 Experience
$40,000 $80,000 Salary
Salary
0 $20,000
5 10 15 20 25 30
$60,000 Number Supervised Line Fit
Predicted Salary
Years$0
Employed
$40,000 Plot Salary
Salary
0 $20,000
2 4 6 8 10 12 14
$100,000
Sales Department Line Fit
Predicted Salary
Years$0
Education Plot Salary
Predicted Salary
0 $50,000
Salary
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
$100,000
Upper 95.0% Gender
$0 Salary
0 $50,000 Predicted
Salary
31054.7 1 5 101520253035404550
343.6695 10 Number $0
Supervised
904.7123 5 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
2284.159 4 Sales Department
1031.434 0
302.5078 12
-4081.674 0
37659.25
t
ed Line Fit
Salary
artment Line Fit
Predicted Salary
Plot Salary
Predicted Salary
Salary
04550 Predicted Salary
Variable Cells
Cell Name Original Value Final Value Integer
$B$14 Number of cards to produce Ames 600 300 Contin
$C$14 Number of cards to produce Bryan 400 400 Contin
$D$14 Number of cards to produce Casper 100 250 Contin
$E$14 Number of cards to produce Danbury 300 350 Contin
$F$14 Number of cards to produce Edison 0 100 Contin
Constraints
Cell Name Cell Value Formula Status Slack
$G$22 Rail limit Total Profit 550 $G$22<=$I$22 Not Binding 150
$G$23 Total Required Cost Total Profit 1400 $G$23<=$I$23 Binding 0
$G$24 Truck Limit Total Profit 850 $G$24<=$I$24 Binding 0
$G$23 Total Required Cost Total Profit 1400 $G$23>=$I$23 Binding 0
$G$25 Union Supply Total Profit -100 $G$25<=$I$25 Not Binding 100
$G$26 Ames Total Profit 300 $G$26<=$I$26 Not Binding 300
$G$27 Bryan Total Profit 400 $G$27<=$I$27 Binding 0
$G$28 Casper Total Profit 250 $G$28<=$I$28 Not Binding 250
$G$29 Danbury Total Profit 350 $G$29<=$I$29 Binding 0
$G$30 Edison Total Profit 100 $G$30<=$I$30 Not Binding 200
$G$31 Volatile Matter Average Total Profit -28000 $G$31<=$I$31 Binding 0
$B$14 Number of cards to produce Ames 300 $B$14>=0 Not Binding 300
$C$14 Number of cards to produce Bryan 400 $C$14>=0 Not Binding 400
$D$14 Number of cards to produce Casper 250 $D$14>=0 Not Binding 250
$E$14 Number of cards to produce Danbury 350 $E$14>=0 Not Binding 350
$F$14 Number of cards to produce Edison 100 $F$14>=0 Not Binding 100
ger Constraints, Assume NonNegative
Microsoft Excel 16.0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [Data (3).xlsx]Q4_Table2
Report Created: 11/04/2025 16:03:21
Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
$B$14 Number of cards to produce Ames 300 0 0 0 0
$C$14 Number of cards to produce Bryan 400 0 0 0 1E+030
$D$14 Number of cards to produce Casper 250 0 0 0 0
$E$14 Number of cards to produce Danbury 350 0 0 0 1E+030
$F$14 Number of cards to produce Edison 100 0 0 0 0
Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
$G$22 Rail limit Total Profit 550 0 700 1E+030 150
$G$23 Total Required Cost Total Profit 1400 0 1400 1E+030 0
$G$24 Truck Limit Total Profit 850 0 850 200 100
$G$23 Total Required Cost Total Profit 1400 0 1400 0 81.81818182
$G$25 Union Supply Total Profit -100 0 0 1E+030 100
$G$26 Ames Total Profit 300 0 600 1E+030 300
$G$27 Bryan Total Profit 400 0 400 100 50
$G$28 Casper Total Profit 250 0 500 1E+030 250
$G$29 Danbury Total Profit 350 0 350 100 50
$G$30 Edison Total Profit 100 0 300 1E+030 200
$G$31 Volatile Matter Average Total Profit -28000 0 -28000 1500 1500
Microsoft Excel 16.0 Limits Report
Worksheet: [Data (3).xlsx]Q4_Table2
Report Created: 11/04/2025 16:03:21
Objective
Cell Name Value
$G$18 Profit per unit Total Profit 421,550
Decision Variables
Ames Bryan Casper Danbury Edison
Number of cards to produce 300 400 250 350 100
Objective
Constraints
Rail limit 1 0 1 0 0
Total Required Cost 1 1 1 1 1
Truck Limit 0 1 0 1 1
Union Supply 1 -1 1 -1 1
Ames 1
Bryan 1
Casper 1
Danbury 1
Edison 1
Volatile Matter Average -16 -18 -22 -24 -21
Total Profit
421,550
Capacity
550 <= 700
1400 >= 1,400
850 <= 850
-100 >= 0
300 <= 600
400 <= 400
250 <= 500
350 <= 350
100 <= 300
-28000 <= -28,000