J.

Electrical Systems 20-7s (2024): 1853-1858

1
Rajat Gupta, Advanced Smart Channel Estimation
2
Dr. Vikas Soni
Scheme for MIMO OSTBC Systems
Based Wireless Communication

Abstract: - Labeling diversity is used in an orthogonal space-time block coded (OSTBC) scheme to improve wireless
connection reliability without reducing spectral efficiency. Compared to the conventional STBC system, it achieves
improved link dependability. The purpose of this work is to provide a blind wireless channel estimator that is bandwidth-
efficient for the OSTBC system. Methods for channel estimation, such as least-squares (LS) & minimum mean square
error (MMSE) methods typically use the channel bandwidth inefficiently. The receiver noise variance and prior broadcast
pilot symbols knowledge & statistics information of channel are required for LS & MMSE channel estimating algorithms
to accurately estimate the channel. An neural network machine learning (NNML) channel estimation with transmitter end
power-share is suggested in order to make blind channel estimator simpler for the OSBC-based MIMO transmission & to
lessen amount of bandwidth requirement for estimation of channel. By using mathematical modeling equivalent to noise
power, we determine the ideal transmit fraction of power that reduces bandwidth consumption due to channel estimate. It
is demonstrated that the blind NN-ML nased channel estimation with transmitter power-share uses 20% of the bandwidth
of the MMSE & LS wireless channel estimators in order to achieve the OSTBC system's low bit error rate (BER) in the
case of M-PSK modulation.

Keywords: Space time block coding, Transmit diversity, Machine learning, channel estimation, wireless communication.

INTRODUCTION
Systems for communication have grown indispensable to daily life and cannot be done without. As a result, high
data rates have drastically expanded in recent years for the wireless communication system in demand. Multi-I/P
Multi-O/P (MIMO), distributes multi antennas spatially on transmit & receive ends, is one of the most important
technical advancements in modem communication systems for reducing multipath fading and enhancing
communications reliability [1]. OSTBCs are an evolved form of the Alamouti approach [2, 3], but they share
many of the same essential requirements. The OSTBCs are an example of orthogonal codes that are affected by
the number of transmit antennas but can achieve full transmit diversity. Additionally, the schemes of encoding
and decoding on both the transmitter and receiver sides of OSTBCs are identical to those of the Alamouti space-
time code, making them a complex version. As a result of the requirement to use a decoding algorithm with a
straightforward linear feature and the introduction of OSTBCs, the maximum order of diversity for the same
number of transmit and receive antennas was achieved using OSTBCs [4]. The researcher is interested in the
design of the estimation of the channel because processing of channel estimation has been utilized when
transmit signals burst through the channel to provide crucial information about the various interactions that
occur with the data signal. For wireless channel estimation, various suggested strategies have produced channel
state information (CSI). The MIMO type in remote correspondence innovation at the beneficiary end,
compelling created procedures have been advanced recently for channel assessment.

FRAMEWORK MODEL AND CHANNEL ASSESSMENT FOUNDATION

A. Framework Model
The BER execution of the channel assessment calculations is assessed utilizing a 2XNr framework, where Nr
indicates the quantity of get recieving wires and 2 signifies the quantity of communicate receiving wires. The
conventional 2XNr Alamouti framework has been modified in this framework [2]. The major thought is to
communicate a planned image pair as opposed to complex forms in the subsequent schedule opening. Based on
two mappers, the system creates the 2X2 STBC codeword matrix; ɷW1 and ɷW2 as shown in [1]. According to
[1], the optimized labeling map ɷ162 and the Graycoded labeling map ɷ161 are, for instance, the two mappers for
constellations of signal. [1] describes the label maps and their design criteria in detail.
The modulator is fed a bitstream of 2log2 W binary random data, here W represents W-PSK/ W-QAM order of
modulator and d=[bt1,bt2] for producing the modulation symbol x1=[xt1xt2]T as a pair associated to the Ist time

1Engineering and Technology Department1, Department of Electronics and communication

Engineering2,
Career Point University1, Modi Institute of Technology2, Kota, India
[email protected], [email protected]

1853
 J. Electrical Systems 20-7s (2024): 1853-1858

slot & x2=[xt2xt1]T for the second time slot, respectively. Suppose that (x1, x2) is an ordered pair & that xLD is a
set containing total pairs modulated symbol (x1, x2) that are possible, so that (x1, x2) is equal to X LD. In light of
bt1 and bt2 , where bt1=[b11b12…b1m], bt2=[b12b22…..bm2] with m = log2W, the naming guide ɷW1 produces Qxt1
and Qxt2 , while ɷW2 produces Qxt1 and Qxt2 , separately, where xti and Qxti have a place with a W-PSK/ W-
QAM grouping set , with ti ϵ [1: W]

E{|xti|2}= 1 such that i ϵ [1 to 2]

The 2X2 STBC images, which are W-PSK data images and N channel assessment pilot images that are
communicated per outline and per send radio wire, are sent over a semi static blurring remote channel with a
consistent channel gain for each message outline. The Zadoff-Chu grouping [29] is used to create the pilot
images because it can produce symmetrical complex successions of constant abundance and changing stage.
Since the LS & MMSE channel assessment scheme depend on network reversal, it is essential to minimize the
effort behind evaluating a single square lattice XrXHr. Equation is used to generate the pilot symbols for the
Zadoff-Chu sequence.
−𝑗𝑛𝑄𝜋(2𝑞+𝑛)
,
𝑒 𝑁 , ∀𝑁 = 2∅, ∅ ∈ [1, ∞)
𝑃(𝑛) = { −𝑗𝑛𝑄𝜋(2𝑞+𝑛+1)
𝑒 𝑁 , ∀𝑁 = 2∅ + 1, ∅ ∈ [1, ∞)

here nε[0 to N-1}, P(n) belongs to set C reperesenting encoded pilot symbol at location n for the N-layered
vector of pilot symbol, N representing quantity of pilot data sent for each vector of symbol, j is an intricate
number, q ε N & Q associated to general indivisible to N and submits to situation
𝜑 (𝑁, 𝑄) = 1

here φ representing function with the greatest common denominator. Rayleigh frequency-at-fading is the
wireless channel. Equations (3) and (4) are used to mathematically model the pilot symbols that are received at
the receiver as well as the information and message symbols:
𝑌𝑟 = 𝐻 𝜏 𝑋𝑟 + 𝑁𝑟
𝑌𝑖 = 𝐻 𝜏+1 𝑋𝑖 + 𝑁𝑖

where Hτ+1=Hτ=HϵCNrXNt is the steady remote channel network north of one transmission outline on the grounds
that the remote channel is semi static blurring. According to CN (0, 1), the complex channel gains in the channel
matrix H are identically & independent distribution (i.i.d). Xr ϵ CNtXN is the matrix of transmitted symbol of pilot
data, and Xi ϵ CNtXN is the matrix of transmitter symbol of information for Nt=2, two timeslots, & transmitter
antennas. W-QAM/W-PSK symbols have been transmitted by the information symbol matrix X i. Yi ϵCNrX2 is the
information symbol matrix received for two timeslots and Nr are antennas at receiving end, while Yr ϵ CNrXN is
the matrix pilot symbol observed for Nr antennas. The added substance white Gaussian clamor (AWGN) lattice
Nr ϵ CNrXN is seen at the remote beneficiary over the got Nr X N pilot images. When the information symbols are
received at the wireless receiver over two timeslots, the AWGN data is represented as Ni ϵ CNrX2 is observed.
The complex Gaussian distribution is observed in the i.i.d entries of the information noise matrix Ni and the
/reference noise matrix Nr.
𝑤𝑦
𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑥 ~∁𝑁(0, 𝜎𝑖2 ) 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑛𝑟 ~∁𝑁(0, 𝜎𝑟2 )

where nizx is the data noise with array of zth row & xth column entry, nwyr is the pilot / reference noise matrix's
wth number of rows and yth number of columns, and σ2i is the mean value of noise power for the data received.
As displayed in Figure 1, the framework of proposed scheme takes a negligible portion of the send power from
the data image transmission from the remote transmission side and gives this communicate power part to the
pilot/reference data transmission [28]. Mα transmit power is allocated to N pilot symbols when it is know that M
information symbols are transmitting per frame and per transmitting antenna. This indicates that each data
symbol information loses α transmission power while each pilot gains M/N α more transmission power. This is
denoted mathematically as:
2
𝜎𝑖2 =
(1 − 𝛼)𝛾
2
𝜎𝑟2 =
𝑀
(1 − 𝛼)𝛾
𝑁

1854
 J. Electrical Systems 20-7s (2024): 1853-1858

Where α is the fraction of transmitter power, M is the number of symbols of data information sent per frame, N
is the number of pilot symbols sent in each frame, and is the average received SNR for each receiver end
antenna: In order to transmit M+N symbols of data and pilot, the power requirement must remain constant. This
restriction on transmit power efficiency. Processed is the ideal power portion that ensuring optimum value of
MSE & BER execution. They got pilot image grid Yr is taken care of to the AI based fake brain organization
(ANN)- put together channel assessor with respect to the remote recipient side. The ANN-based channel
estimation then predicting the wireless channel and feeding it once per receiving frame to the maximum
likelihood (ML) detection. In light of the obtained Yi image grid, the ML locator then makes use of the channel
gauge Hest to identify the communicated images.

Fig. 1. Shows the system with ANN based channel estimator with transmit power-sharing.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:

By simulating coherent different phase-shift keying modulation over flat-fading Rayleigh channels, this section
highlights the contrast between transmit and receive diversity. For send variety, the utilization of two
communicate receiving wires and one get radio wire (2x1 notationally), while forget variety is utilized with one
send radio wire and two get radio wires (1x2 notationally).

Transmitter and receiver diversity

1
BPSK No
0.8 Diversity (1Tx,
1Rx)
0.6
BER

BPSK Alamouti
0.4 (2Tx, 1Rx)

0.2 BPSK Maximal-

Ratio Combining
0 (1Tx, 2Rx)
0 10 20 30 QPSK No
Eb No. Diversity (1Tx,
1Rx)

Figure 3: Compariion of multiple modulation technique BPSK,QPSK,8PSK and 16PSK for different
transmit and receive diversity schemes.

Figure 3 shows the collective graph for all the cases that involves BPK,QPSK,8PSK and 16PSK.It has observed
that as the modulation order increases the BER increases. BERBPSK < BERQPSK < BER8PSK < BER 16PSK .For all
the cases as the EbNo is increased from 0 to 20 the BER reduces. For low EbNo the difference in BER is
significant but at higher EbNo the BER performance are equally converges. For all the cases the MIMO
systems using Alamouti /MRC is better than SISO (1x1 Tx and Rx ) system.

1855
 J. Electrical Systems 20-7s (2024): 1853-1858

Figure 4: BER vs. EbNo at different frame length and number of pilot symbols with and without channel
estimation for 2x1 and 2x2 MIMO system for BPSK modulation.

Figure 4 is representing the BER vs EbNo performance for 100 frame length and at different number of pilot
symbols in frame under BPSK based OSTC MIMO system data transmission over the fading channel. The
performance are compared for 2x1 without applying channel estmation,2x1 with channel estimation and 2x2
with channel estimation. The red solid line with square marker represents without channel estimation case. It has
higher BER. The lines with circle marker in red, blue and black colors are representing the BER values at 2x1
MIMO OSTBC transmission at number of pilot symbols 8,12 and 20.There is no significant difference is
observed in BER on increasing the pilot symbols. The curves with * marker in red, blue and black solid lines are
representing 2x2 system at number of pilot symbols 8,12 and 20.There is no significant difference in increasing
pilot symbols. The BER value is significantly reduced on applying 2x2 system compared to 2x1 MONO
OSTBC with channel estimation.
Similar to figure 4 the performance of MINO OSTBC with smart channel estimation is performed for QPSK and
8PSK modulation order and shown in figure 5 and 6. The change in the number of pilot symbols do not bring
any remarkable variation in BER. But the 2x2 MIMO system has lower BER value compared to 2x1 system.

Figure 5: BER vs. EbNo at different frame length and number of pilot symbols with and without channel
estimation for 2x1 and 2x2 MIMO system for QPSK modulation.

Figure 6: BER vs. EbNo at different frame length and number of pilot symbols with and without channel
estimation for 2x1 and 2x2 MIMO system for 8PSK modulation.

1856
 J. Electrical Systems 20-7s (2024): 1853-1858

80

Total Time Elapsed

60 BPSK
40 N=2,M=1

(sec.)
20 BPSK
0 N=2,M=2

frame…
frame…
frame…
frame…
frame…
frame…
frame…
frame…
frame…
QPSK
N=2,M=1
Frame length and number of pilot …

Figure 7: Total time for 2x1 and 2x2 MIMO systems with BPSK, QPSK, and 8PSK modulation at various
frame lengths and pilot symbol counts with and without estimate.

Figure 7 is drawn for the total time taken in running simulation for transmitting 3000 data packets of different
frame length of 100,150 and 200 with number of pilot symbols 8,12 and 20.It is observed that 2x2 system takes
higher elapsed time compared 2x1 system for all modulation order BPSK,QPSK and 8PSK.Highest elapsed time
is observed for BPSK 2x2 system at frame length 100 and number of pilot symbol 12 and lowest elapsed time is
observed for 8PSK with frame length of 200 and number of pilot symbol 12.

CONCLUSION
The proposed technique further develops the NN-ML channel assessment MSE exactness. The NN-ML based
estimator of channel response computation beats the customary MMSE & LS procedures to the extent that BER
execution across the entire SNR range. The NN-ML channel estimation beats the traditional assessment
strategies with regards to send power-sharing BER execution. The NN-ML calculation doesn't need information
on the commotion fluctuation or channel autocorrelation insights to gauge the remote channel. This indicates
that when the transmitter side pilot symbols, channel second-order statistics, and receiver noise variance are not
known, the NN-ML algorithm based on power-sharing can be utilized for wireless channel estimation. Because
traditional estimation algorithms require a greater number of pilot symbols for achieving comparable
performance, we can infer from the analysis that may be used for the optimal number of pilot symbols for
achieving high BER accuracy under channel estimation while reducing costly channel bandwidth. Based on the
simulation results, the proposed NNML channel assessor needs a lower exchange speed than MMSE & LS in
order to get comparable BER execution for various PSK balances. Even though the all-out passed planned of
correspondence is higher in the 2x2 MIMO framework, the BER is lower. The shortest elapsed time is provided
by the 8PSK scheme with 2x1 MIMO.

REFERENCES:
[1] S. M. Alamouti, “A Simple Transmit Diversity Technique for Wireless Communications”, IEEE Journal on
Select Areas in Communications, Vol. 16, No. 8, pp.1451- 1458, October 1998.
[2] S. G. Glisic, Advance Wireless Communications, 2nd Edition Johan Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2007.
[3] J. R. Hampton, Introduction to MIMO Communications, Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[4] G. Qian, L. Li and M. Luo, “On the Blind Channel Identifiability of MIMO-STBC Systems Using
Noncircular Complex FastICA Algorithm”, Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp 1859–
1881, 2014.
[5] N. Pillay and H. Xu, ``Uncoded space-time labeling diversity Application of media-based modulation with
RF mirrors,'' IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 272275, Feb. 2018.
[6] T. Quazi and H. Xu, ``SSD-enhanced uncoded space-time labeling diversity,'' Int. J. Commun. Syst., vol. 31,
no. 11, p. e3592, 2018.
[7] B. Dlodlo and H. Xu, ``Trellis code-aided high-rate M-QAM space-time labeling diversity using a unitary
expansion,'' Int. J. Commun. Syst., vol. 31, no. 11, p. e3590, 2018.
[8] D. Ayanda, H. Xu, and N. Pillay, ``Uncoded M-ary quadrature amplitude modulation space-time labeling
diversity with three transmit antennas,'' Int. J. Commun. Syst., vol. 31, no. 18, p. e3818, 2018.
[9] D. Ayanda, S. Mughal, and K. A. Abdulsalam, ``Performance analysis of rectangularQAMuncoded space-
time labeling diversity over Nakagami-m fading channels,'' in Proc. IEEE Microw. Theory Techn.Wireless
Commun. (MTTW), Riga, Latvia, Oct. 2020, pp. 163-167.
[10] D. Ayanda, H. Xu, and S. Mughal, ``High-density M-QAM mapper design for uncoded space-time labeling
diversity with three transmit antennas over Nakagami-m fading channels,'' in Proc. IEEE AFRICON, Accra,
Ghana,
Sep. 2019, pp. 1-7.

1857
 J. Electrical Systems 20-7s (2024): 1853-1858

[11] M. Soltani, V. Pourahmadi, A. Mirzaei, and H. Sheikhzadeh, ``Deep learning-based channel estimation,''
IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 652655, Apr. 2019.
[12] H. He, C.-K.Wen, S. Jin, and G. Y. Li, ``Deep learning-based channel estimation for beamspace mmWave
massive MIMO systems,'' IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 852855, Oct. 2018.
[13] Y. Yang, F. Gao, X. Ma, and S. Zhang, ``Deep learning-based channel estimation for doubly selective
fading channels,'' IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 3657936589, 2019.
[14] S. Gao, P. Dong, Z. Pan, and G. Y. Li, ``Deep learning based channel estimation for massive MIMO with
mixed-resolution ADCs,'' IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 19891993, Nov. 2019.
[15] J.-M. Kang, C.-J. Chun, and I.-M. Kim, ``Deep-learning-based channel estimation for wireless energy
transfer,'' IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 23102313, Nov. 2018.
[16] Q. Bai, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, and J. Song, ``Deep learning-based channel estimation algorithm over time
selective fading channels,'' IEEE Trans. Cognit. Commun. Netw., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 125134, Mar. 2020.
[17] H. Ye, G. Y. Li, and B.-H. Juang, ``Power of deep learning for channel estimation and signal detection in
OFDM systems,'' IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 114117, Feb. 2018.
[18] X. Cheng, D. Liu, C. Wang, S. Yan, and Z. Zhu, ``Deep learningbased channel estimation and equalization
scheme for FBMC/OQAM systems,'' IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 881884, Jun. 2019.
[19] Y. Liao, Y. Hua, X. Dai, H. Yao, and X. Yang, ``ChanEstNet: A deep learning based channel estimation for
high-speed scenarios,'' in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC), Shanghai, China, May 2019, pp. 16.
[20] J. P. Nair and R. V. R. Kumar, ``A bandwidth efcient channel estimation method using superimposed
training for MIMO-OFDM systems,'' in Proc. IEEE Region Conf. (TENCON), Hyderabad, India, Nov. 2008,
pp. 15.
[21] W. G. Jeon, K. H. Paik, and Y. S. Cho, ``An efcient channel estimation technique for OFDM systems with
transmitter diversity,'' in Proc. 11th IEEE Int. Symp. Pers. Indoor Mobile Radio Commun. (PIMRC), London,
U.K., Sep. 2000, pp. 12461250.
[22] C. Shin, R. W. Heath, Jr., and E. J. Powers, ``Blind channel estimation for MIMO-OFDM systems,'' IEEE
Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 670685, Mar. 2007.
[23] K. Josiam and D. Rajan, ``Bandwidth efcient channel estimation using super-imposed pilots in OFDM
systems,'' IEEE Trans.Wireless Commun., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 22342245, Jun. 2007.
[24] J. Siew, J. Coon, R. Piechocki, A. Nix, M. Beach, S. Armour, and J. Mcgeehan, ``A bandwidth efcient
channel estimation algorithm for MIMO-SCFDE,'' in Proc. IEEE 58th Veh. Technol. Conf. (VTC-Fall),
Orlando, FL, USA, Oct. 2003, pp. 11421146.
[25] A. Koohian, H. Mehrpouyan, M. Ahmadian, and M. Azarbad, ``Bandwidth efcient channel estimation for
full duplex communication systems,'' in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC), London, U.K., Jun. 2015, pp.
47104714.
[26] M. Pukkila, ``Channel estimation modeling. Post-graduate course in radio-communications,'' Nokia Res.
Center, Helsinki, Finland, Tech. Rep. S-72.333, 2000.
[27] C. R. Murthy, A. K. Jagannatham, and B. D. Rao, ``Training-based and semiblind channel estimation for
MIMO systems with maximum ratio transmission,'' IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 25462558,
Jul. 2006.
[28] K. Kadathlal, H. Xu, and N. Pillay, ``Generalised differential scheme for spatial modulation systems,'' IET
Commun., vol. 11, no. 13, pp. 20202026, Sep. 2017.
[29] M. PremKumar, M. P. Chitra, M. Arun, and M. S. Saravanan, ``Least squares based channel estimation
approach and bit error rate analysis of cognitive radio,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Robot., Automat., Control Embedded
Syst. (RACE), Chennai, India, Feb. 2015, pp. 14.

1858