Pages Imp Os 2
Pages Imp Os 2
Financial ratio analysis is the process of reviewing the financial position of the company.
Ratio analysis is extensively used by firms as a technique to forecast the financial soundness
of the company to build future growth. This study aims at analyzing the financial
performance of Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki by calculating financial ratios. The primary
objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki
during the last 5 years. The reference period taken for study is 5 years starting from 2019 to
2024.Ratios like Current ratio, liquid ratio debt equity ratio, interest coverage ratio and gross
profit ratio were calculated to serve the purpose of assessing the financial performance of the
company. Further trend analysis and comparative income statement were also analyzed.
Secondary data was collected from annual reports of Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki to derive
relevant information. The results reveal that the company has performed reasonably well
during the reference period. The company has shown a good potential by earning returns for
their shareholders.
Chapter – I
INTRODUCTION
1. Assessment of current position: The management will want to know whether the
enterprise is heading towards as per plan or lagging in their targets. Frequent recording of
the financial transactions helps them to identify their fiscal position.
3. Future decision making: quarterly, half-yearly and annual financial statement helps to
execute plans in a better way. Its objective is to assess and predict the earning prospects
with reliable information so as to help the executives/investors to make better decisions.
Importance to management: The management needs up-to date, accurate and structured
financial data for interpretation of operations of the company. Financial statements assist the
management in comprehending the progress, prospects, and position of the business
counterpart in the industry. It helps to identify whether the resources of the firm were utilized
effectively, to determine the fiscal strength of the firm and to forecast the future prospects of
the enterprise. Any discrepancies can be dealt with by structuring new policies and plans
according to the result of the analysis.
Importance to stock exchange: the value of shares and debentures being traded in the
stock exchange are determined on the basis of financial/fiscal position and credit worthiness of
the company. The financial statements give accurate and reliable information to fix the price
for shares and debentures.
Importance to bankers: By analyzing the financial statement of a company, the bankers can
assess the ability of the enterprise to meet its obligations, short term and long term solvency,
credit worthiness, earring capacity etc. the borrowing capacity can be identified and the extent
of loan can be fixed by the banker after evaluating the financial statement.
TECHNIQUES OR TOOLS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS:
The most essential techniques used for analyzing and interpreting the financial statements are
as follows:
➢ The first step in ratio analysis is to gather relevant information from financial statements
and calculate appropriate ratios required for decision under consideration.
➢ The next step is to compare the calculated ratios with the past ratios and industry ratios in
order to assess the relative meaning.
➢ The final step is to interpret the significance of various ratios, draw inferences and write a
report. The report may contain specific action in matter of the decision situation or may
present alternatives with comparative merits or it may just state facts and interpretations.
➢ Ratios reveal the trends in costs, sales, profit and other inter-related facts, which will be
helpful in forecasting future events.
➢ The analyzed ratios can be used as “instrument of control” regarding sales, costs and profit.
➢ Ratios help to determine the operational efficiency by comparison of present ratios with
those of the past working and industry ratios.
➢ Ratios facilitates the investment decisions by computing the return on investment which in
turn helps the management in taking effecting decisions regarding profitable avenues of
investment.
LIMITATION OF THE RATIO ANALYSIS:
➢ A single ratio may not provide meaningful sense, for better understanding a number
of ratios need to be calculated, which may lead to confusion.
➢ There are no standard norms for calculating ratios; hence the interpretation may
become difficult.
➢ Each firm follows its own accounting procedure; hence comparison between the firms
may not yield accurate results.
➢ Moreover past ratios may not be effective for future decision making.
➢ Price level changes are not considered while computing ratios; therefore it makes
the ratio interpretation invalid.
➢
(ii) Trend analysis
The process of reviewing and analyzing historical data to identify patterns, trends, or future
possibilities. It involves looking at data over time to understand changes, make informed
predictions, and strategize for the future. This technique is widely used in various fields, including
business, finance, technology, and social sciences.
Based on past data: only the past data of the firms are included in the financial statements,
which are then further analyzed. The future cannot be just like the past. So, the analysis of future
estimation cannot be taken literally for forecasting, future budgeting and planning. It can,
however, be considered as a precaution.
Problem in comparability: The size of the business concern can be varying according to their
volume of transactions. Hence the figures of different financial statements and different firms
lose the characteristic of comparability. So the analyst must choose the statements accordingly
for comparison.
Reliability: Very rarely, in some companies, the financial managers tweak and manipulate the
financial statements to make it look profitable to show favorable results.
Data Availability: The study relies on publicly available financial reports, which may not
provide complete insights into the companies' internal financial policies or undisclosed
information.
Time Frame: The analysis is restricted to a specific period (mention the years, e.g., 2019–
2024). Any conclusions drawn may not apply beyond this period.
Accounting Policies: Differences in accounting policies and practices followed by Tata Motors
and Maruti Suzuki may affect the comparability of financial data.
Non-Financial Factors: The study mainly focuses on financial metrics, neglecting qualitative
factors like customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, market share, brand value, etc.
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
1. Shaikh Salman Masood (2020) in his study Financial Statement Analysis of Tata Motors
Limited carried out for the period 2017, 2018, 2019 has noticed abnormal amounts of
debt of tata motors and pointed out their lack of ability to pay contractual payments. Out
of the 3 financial years, 2017 had the highest quick and current ratios indicating the firm’s
highest liquidity. It has decreased ever since.
2. Bhupender Kumar Som1 , Himanshu Goel2 (2020) in their journal “Ratio Analysis: A
Study on Financial Performance of Tata Motors”, reviewed thefinancial performance of
Tata Motors from 2016-2020. The results reveal the Return on capital employed and
Net worth were at all time low. The current ratio of the firm were to be considered
a matter of concern for the investors as it directly influences the company’s financial
performance. The company seemed to produce good results in 2019, before the pandemic, may
be due to the expected reasons such as voluntary retirement scheme and sell-off non- core assets
which worked well in favor of the company
3. Kumar (2021) analyzed the working capital management and solvency trends of leading Indian
automobile companies. The study highlighted that Maruti Suzuki has a stronger liquidity position,
whereas Tata Motors relies more on external borrowings, affecting its solvency ratios. Gupta &
Sharma (2022) examined the financial performance of Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki
using key financial ratios such as liquidity, profitability, and solvency. Their study found
that Maruti Suzuki maintained better profitability and liquidity, while Tata Motors had
higher leverage due to debt-financed expansion strategies
4. Biswajit Rout **Abinash Dash ***Baisali Das (2020) in their journal “A Study on
Financial Statement Analysis of Maruti Suzuki India Limited Company” reviewed the
financial performance of the frim from 2009-2019. They concluded that the prosperity of
Maruti Suzuki has been wealthy for the last 10 years. It was found to be in a gradually
increasing manner regarding the Net Sales and Net Profits of the company since 2009
onwards.
6. B Navaneetha, R Padmasri and A Pavithira (2018) in their study “A ratio analysis of Maruti
Suzuki India Ltd '' have concluded that MSIL is following a conservative working capital
policy as it maintains minimum level of liquidity. Companies with low liquidity ratios have a
higher risk of meeting its current obligations. In the case of MSIL the fall in the liquidity ratios is
offset by the rise in profitability ratios. The company allocates more funds on investments to have
an edge over the competitors. MSIL is the king of the Indian automotive industry. MSIL has been
consistently surviving in the industry with the effective growth rate which is evidenced by high
profit earning capacity.
7. MD Qamar Azam and MD Abrar Alam (2020) in their study “FINANCIAL RATIOS
AND ANALYSIS OF TATA MOTORS” found out that the Overall Z score of Tata
motors is lies between 0.71 to 2.44, lowest in 2015. Company needs serious studies. We
can say that its main reason is company's working capital to total assets is negative during
the periods. It's all profitability ratios are under the average and negative during the years.
Debt to total assets is approx. 60-70% which is above the average. Debt to equity ratio is
moving between 1.5 to 2.2 which is bad for any company. In the case of the liquidity
ratios which are very low relatively to industry. On an average tata motors financial ratios
indicates that its financial conditions are under performance.
8. Patel & Rao (2023) conducted a comparative profitability analysis and found that Maruti
Suzuki consistently achieved higher net profit margins and return on assets, whereas Tata
Motors exhibited fluctuations due to its capital-intensive projects. The study suggested
that Maruti Suzuki follows a conservative financial approach, while Tata Motors focuses
on aggressive growth strategies.
9. The Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) Annual Report (2023) on the automobile sector’s
financial trends indicated that Tata Motors carries a heavier debt burden, impacting its
financial stability. In contrast, Maruti Suzuki operates with minimal debt and a self-
sustaining capital structure.
10. According to ICRA (2022), Tata Motors has been investing heavily in EV technology,
which has increased its financial risk but positioned it as a long-term market leader.
Maruti Suzuki, on the other hand, follows a stable investment approach, prioritizing fuel
efficiency and hybrid technology.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
• hence the theoretical scope consists of accounting aspects and financial ratios.
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY:
• The report focuses only on Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki Ltd.
• The period of study is limited to 5 years
• The financial reports considered for the study are within the specified 5 years
• Certain ratios were only calculated due to insufficiency of data.
• The study is mainly based on secondary data derived from annual reports and
accounts of Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki, therefore the reliability and
accuracy of the findings depends on such data.
SAMPLE DESIGN:
The study undertook convenience sampling to collect the required data.
SAMPLE SIZE:
Past 5 years of both Tata Motors Ltd and Maruti Suzuki Ltd are taken into
consideration to analyze, evaluate and interpret the results.
SAMPLE SELECTION:
The balance sheet, Income statement and profit and loss A/C and other related Financial
Reports of Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki were incorporated in the study.
• Ratio Analysis
• Trend Analysis
Chapter - III
COMPANY PROFILE
Two automobile companies have been chosen for the study. They are tata motors ltd and
maruti suzuki ltd.
TATA MOTORS:
• Tata Harrier (2019) – A bold mid-size SUV known for its powerful performance.
• Tata Nexon EV (2020) – A popular electric SUV offering impressive performance
and range.
• Tata Altroz (2020) – A premium hatchback with a focus on safety and design.
• Tata Punch (2021) – A compact, stylish micro SUV with a premium feel
• Tata Safari (2021) – A reimagined full-size SUV offering luxury and space.
• Tata Tigor EV (2021) – An affordable electric sedan for urban commuting.
• Tata Tiago EV (2022) – A compact and budget-friendly electric hatchback.
• Tata Curvv (2024) – A futuristic electric SUV concept with a focus on design and
performance.
• Tata Sierra EV (2024) – An electric version of the iconic Sierra SUV, reviving a classic
name with modern features.
MARUTI SUZUKI:
Maruti Suzuki India Limited, formerly known as Maruti Udyog Limited, is an Indian
automobile manufacturer, based in New Delhi. It was founded in 1981 and owned by the
Government of India until 2003, when it was sold to the Japanese automaker
Suzuki Motor Corporation. As of early 2025 Maruti Suzuki has a market share of 42 percent
in the Indian passenger car market.
As of August 2024, Maruti Suzuki has 2,987 Arena sales outlets across 2,522 cities and 495
Nexa sales outlets across 301 cities in India. Maruti’s dealership network is larger than that
of enough known companies combined. Service is a major revenue generator of the company.
Most of the service stations are managed on franchise basis, where Maruti Suzuki trains the
local staff. Also, The Express Service stations exist, sending across their repair man to the
vehicle if it is away from a normal service center.
REVENUE AND INCOME OF MARUTI SUZUKI
Revenue ₹1,34,938 Crores (2024)
• Maruti Suzuki Vitara Brezza BS6 (2020) - The updated version of the Vitara Brezza with a
BS6-compliant engine and design updates.
• Maruti Suzuki S-Cross Facelift (2020) - Updated with a new design, features, and a more
refined engine.
• Maruti Suzuki XL6(2021) - A premium MPV based on the Ertiga, launched with a 1.5L
engine and improved features.
• Maruti Suzuki Celerio (New Generation)(2021) - Completely redesigned with the new
K10C engine, modern styling, and features.
• Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara (2022)- A new mid-size SUV co-developed with Toyota,
offering hybrid powertrains and premium features.
• Maruti Suzuki Fronx(2023) - A new compact crossover based on the Baleno, offering a
coupe-like design and hybrid powertrains.
• Maruti Suzuki Jimny 5-door(2024) - The iconic Jimny, now available in a 5-door version
with more space and comfort.
• Maruti Suzuki Swift CNG (2024)- A newly launched CNG variant of the popular Swift
hatchback.
• Maruti Suzuki Dzire CNG(2024) - CNG variant of the Dzire sedan, offering enhanced fuel
efficiency and eco-friendly performance.
CHAPTER IV
DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
1. Current ratio is a financial metric used to evaluate a company's ability to meet its
short-term obligations with its short-term assets. It is a measure of liquidity and shows
how well a company can cover its liabilities due within a year using its assets that can
be converted into cash within the same period.
TATA MOTORS:
Table 4.1.1. Current Ratio of Tata Motors
MARUTI SUZUKI:
Table 4.1.2. Current Ratio of Maruti Suzuki
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
TATA MARUTI
TATA MOTORS
Table 4.1.4. Liquid ratio of Tata motors
MARUTI SUZUKI
Table 4.1.5. Liquid Ratio of Maruti Suzuki
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024
TATA MARUTI
INFERENCE: The consolidated liquid ratio data indicates a sharp decline in Tata Motors'
liquidity, dropping from 0.78 in 2019-2020 to just 0.06 in 2022-2023 and 2023-2024,
signaling potential liquidity challenges. In contrast, Maruti Suzuki's ratio has fluctuated but
remained relatively stable, peaking at 0.93 in 2020-2021 and settling at 0.67 in 2023-2024.
This suggests that Maruti has managed its short-term financial obligations better, while
Tata Motors may face liquidity risks that could impact its financial stability.
3.Debt-to-equity ratio is a financial metric that indicates the proportion of debt and equity used to
finance a company's assets. It measures the level of financial leverage and helps assess the
company's financial health and risk.
TATA MOTORS
Table 4.1.7. Debt Equity Ratio of Tata Motors
MARUTI SUZUKI
Table 4.1.8. Debt Equity Ratio of Maruti Suzuki
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
TATA MARUTI
INFERENCE: The debt-to-equity ratio is a financial ratio indicating the relative proportion of
shareholders' equity and debt used to finance a company's assets. ideal ratio is 0.5:1 for debt-
equity.The debt-equity ratio is far less than 0.5:1 during all the years of study for Maruti suzuki.
This indicates that debt proportion is highly satisfactory and the company is highly solvent to
pay off its long term debts. Meanwhile the least debt equity ratio for Tata during the study period
is 1.4.
4.Interest coverage ratio is a financial metric that measures a company's ability to meet its interest
payment obligations on outstanding debt. It assesses how easily a company can pay interest on its debt
with its current earnings, providing insight into its financial stability and risk level
TATA MOTORS
Table 4.1.10. Interest Coverage Ratio of Tata Motors
MARUTI SUZUKI
Table 4.1.11. Interest Coverage Ratio of Maruti Suzuki
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
-10
TATA MARUTI
TATA MOTORS
Table 4.1.13. Gross Profit Ratio of Tata Motors
MARUTI SUZUKI
Table 4.1.14. Gross Profit Ratio of Maruti Suzuki
45.00%
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
TATA MARUTI
INFERENCE: The data indicates that Tata Motors has maintained a relatively high gross profit
ratio over the years, peaking at 42.3% in 2022-2023 but then dropping to 35.3% in 2023-2024. In
contrast, Maruti Suzuki has shown a steady improvement, increasing from 15.3% in 2019-2020
to 24.6% in 2023-2024. While Tata Motors experienced fluctuations, Maruti Suzuki demonstrated
consistent growth, suggesting improved cost efficiency and profitability over time.
4.2.TREND ANALYSIS
TREND ANALYSIS OF SALES
TATA MOTORS
MARUTI SUZUKI
Table 4.2.2. Trend Analysis of Sales of Maruti Suzuki
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024
TATA MOTORS
MARUTI SUZUKI
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024
INFERENCE: The table shows the trend percentage of current assets for Tata and Maruti from
2019-2020 to 2023-2024. Tata's trend percentage has increased significantly, especially in 2021-
2022, showing a sharp rise in assets. However, there was a slight dip in 2022-2023 before
increasing again in 2023-2024. On the other hand, Maruti's trend percentage also grew, but with
fluctuations. It peaked in 2020-2021, then declined in the next two years, and rose again in 2023-
2024. This suggests that Tata experienced a rapid expansion, while Maruti had an unstable trend
with periods of growth and decline.
TREND ANALYSIS OF CURRENT LIABILITIES
TATA MOTORS
MARUTI SUZUKI
Table 4.2.8. Trend Analysis of Current Liabilities of Maruti Suzuki
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024
INFERENCE: The table shows how Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki's current liabilities have
changed over the years. Tata Motors' liabilities have increased drastically, especially from 2021-
2022 onwards, reaching very high levels in 2023-2024. This suggests the company may have taken
on more debt or expanded its operations. In contrast, Maruti Suzuki’s liabilities have gone up and
down, showing a more unstable pattern. While its liabilities grew overall, the changes were not as
extreme as Tata Motors'. This difference suggests that Tata is taking bigger financial risks or
making larger investments, while Maruti's approach is more cautious.
CHAPTER V
FINDINGS, SUGGESSTIONS & CONCLUSION
This chapter comprises the project findings, conclusions and suggestions.
FINDINGS:
• All the financial years of both Tata and Maruti didn’t meet the expected current ratio
resulting in inadequate current assets to fully cover short term obligations.
• Both maruti and suzuki have failed to attain the standard quick ratio of 1:1 in the study
period 2019-2024.
• Maruti Suzuki maintained a debt -equity ratio far below 0.5:1 throughout FY 2019 to FY
2024, indicating low reliance on debt and strong solvency. In contrast, Tata Motors had
a significantly higher debt-equity ratio, with the lowest being around 1.4, reflecting
higher financial leverage and greater dependence on debt financing.
• From the above table and analysis, Tata Motors' financial health has improved
significantly over the years. It moved from losses in 2019-2021 to strong growth in
2023-2024, with its interest coverage ratio reaching 3.80. Meanwhile, Maruti Suzuki
has remained financially stable with consistently high figures, increasing from 53.16
in 2019-2020 to 88.22 in 2023-2024. This suggests that while Maruti has always been
strong, Tata Motors has made a great recovery, showing better financial health and
strategic success.
• Tata Motors had a high profit ratio but saw ups and downs, dropping to 35.3% in 2023-
2024. Maruti Suzuki’s profit grew steadily from 15.3% to 24.6% over the years. While
Tata Motors faced fluctuations, Maruti Suzuki improved consistently.
• The trend percentage of sales shows that both Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki
experienced sales growth from 2019-2020 to 2023-2024. Tata Motors had
steady growth, reaching 175.42%, while Maruti Suzuki grew at a slower pace
initially but surpassed Tata Motors in 2023-2024 with 179.58%. Overall, both
companies showed significant improvement in sales trend.
• Tata Motors showed a strong and rapid increase in current assets, especially in 2021-
2022, indicating significant growth. In contrast, Maruti Suzuki experienced fluctuations,
with periods of both growth and decline. This suggests that Tata had a more consistent
expansion, while Maruti faced an unstable asset trend over the years.
• Tata Motors’ liabilities have surged since 2021-2022, indicating higher debt or expansion,
while Maruti Suzuki’s liabilities have fluctuated but grown steadily. This suggests Tata is
taking bigger financial risks, whereas Maruti follows a more cautious approach.
SUGESTIONS:
• Both Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki have to increase their currents assets to
meet the fixed standard.
• Both the company must increase their quick ratio to pay off current debt
obligations without raising external debt.
• The cash ratio must be met with the standard to be able to meet the liquidity of the
company to pay off short term debt.
• Tata must increase their debt equity to pay off long term debts.
• Tata must raise it’s interest coverage ratio to pay off the interest on it’s
outstanding debts.
CONCLUSION:
• Most of the obligations were not met by Tata motors while compared to Maruti
Suzuki.
• Tata Motors struggled to meet key financial ratio benchmarks, facing liquidity
challenges with low current and quick ratios, a high debt-equity ratio, and a weak
interest coverage ratio in earlier years, though it showed some improvement later. In
contrast, Maruti Suzuki maintained stronger financial stability with a low debt-equity
ratio, high interest coverage ratio, and a better cash position. However, both companies
had current and quick ratios below the ideal benchmark, indicating some liquidity
concerns. Overall, Maruti Suzuki demonstrated better fiscal health compared to Tata
Motors during this period.
• While Tata Motors’ profit ratio fluctuated, Maruti Suzuki showed continuous
growth.Maruti Suzuki’s steady increase suggests improved operational efficiency,
whereas Tata Motors’ decline in 2023-2024 might indicate cost pressures or market
challenges.
• During the period, trend analysis shows Tata Motors experienced moderate growth in
sales and current assets, accompanied by a significant increase in current liabilities, while
Maruti Suzuki saw substantial growth in sales and current assets, with a relatively smaller
rise in current liabilities.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
1. Gupta, R., & Sharma, P. (2022). Financial Performance Analysis of Indian Automobile
Giants: A Case Study of Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki. Journal of Financial Studies,
45(3), 120-135.
2. Kumar, S. (2021). Liquidity and Profitability Trends in the Indian Auto Sector: A
Comparative Study. International Journal of Business and Economics, 39(2), 78-92.
3. Patel, V., & Rao, M. (2023). Financial Health Assessment of Tata Motors and Maruti
Suzuki: A Ratio Analysis Approach. Indian Journal of Corporate Finance, 27(1), 45-60.
4. RBI Annual Report (2023). Financial Performance of Indian Auto Sector. Reserve
Bank of India.
5. ICRA (2022). Credit Risk Assessment and Financial Trends in the Indian Automobile
Industry. ICRA Research Reports.
Web Links: