Search Tree

A search tree is a tree structure that is used to represent various search

algorithms in computer science. The tree structure helps visualize how
data is traversed or searched, often in problems involving decision-
making, optimization, or search operations. Two common models of search
trees are:

1. State Space Search Tree:

This type of search tree is primarily used in problem-solving, where the

nodes represent possible states or configurations of a problem, and edges
represent actions or transitions that move from one state to another.

 Root Node: Represents the initial state of the problem.

 Internal Nodes: Represent intermediate states that can be

reached by applying certain actions or operations.

 Leaf Nodes: Represent goal states or solutions.

The tree is typically used for searching through all possible configurations
or states to find a solution. Examples of problems that use this model
include:

 Puzzle solving (like the 8-puzzle or n-queens problem)

 Pathfinding (such as in route planning algorithms)

 AI problem-solving (like in game-playing or decision-making).

Types of Algorithms that Use State Space Search Trees:

 Breadth-First Search (BFS): Explores all nodes at the present

depth before moving to the next level.

 Depth-First Search (DFS): Explores as far down a branch of the

tree as possible before backtracking.

 A Search Algorithm:* A pathfinding algorithm that uses heuristics to

find the shortest path from the initial state to the goal state.

2. Decision Tree:

A decision tree is a model used primarily in machine learning, where the

tree structure is used to represent decisions and their possible
consequences, including outcomes, costs, and utilities. It is a tool for
decision analysis, often used for classification or regression tasks.

 Root Node: Represents the initial decision point or the feature from
which the tree splits.

 Internal Nodes: Represent decisions or questions based on feature

values.
1
 Search Tree

 Leaf Nodes: Represent outcomes or classifications (for

classification tasks) or values (for regression tasks).

The decision tree algorithm is used for:

 Classification: The tree is used to classify data into distinct

categories (e.g., spam vs. non-spam emails).

 Regression: The tree is used to predict continuous values (e.g.,

predicting house prices based on features like location, size, etc.).

Common Algorithms for Decision Trees:

 ID3 (Iterative Dichotomiser 3): Uses entropy and information

gain to split the data.

 C4.5: An extension of ID3 that handles both continuous and discrete

data.

 CART (Classification and Regression Trees): A popular decision

tree algorithm that supports both classification and regression tasks.

Key Differences:

 Purpose:

o State Space Search Trees are used for exploring possible

states to find solutions, commonly applied in AI and problem-
solving.

o Decision Trees are used for making decisions or predictions

based on input features, commonly applied in machine
learning for classification or regression tasks.

 Structure:

o State Space Search Trees represent transitions between

states based on actions or choices made.

o Decision Trees represent decisions based on the values of

features or attributes and split the data at each node.

Both models have their distinct applications and are essential in different
fields of computer science.

General Properties of Search Trees

Search trees, whether they represent state spaces or decisions, share

several common properties that define their structure and behavior. Below
are some key properties:

1. Root Node:

2
 Search Tree

 Definition: The starting point of the tree, representing the initial

state or the first decision.

 State Space Search: Represents the initial problem state.

 Decision Tree: Represents the root decision or feature to split the

data.

2. Internal Nodes:

 Definition: Nodes within the tree that represent intermediate steps

or decisions.

 State Space Search: Each internal node represents a state of the

system or configuration resulting from an action.

 Decision Tree: Represents decisions based on feature values,

where each node splits data based on a decision criterion.

3. Leaf Nodes:

 Definition: Nodes at the end of the tree that represent either the
goal state or the final outcome.

 State Space Search: These are the terminal states, which might
be goal states or dead-ends in problem-solving.

 Decision Tree: Represents the output or classification result (for

classification) or the final value (for regression).

4. Depth:

 Definition: The number of edges from the root to the deepest leaf
node. It indicates the complexity or how deep the search or decision
process might go.

 State Space Search: In algorithms like DFS or BFS, the depth

could represent the number of steps required to find the solution or
reach a goal.

 Decision Tree: The depth represents the number of splits or

decisions made to classify or predict an output.

5. Branching Factor:

 Definition: The number of child nodes connected to a given internal

node, which indicates how many decisions or states are possible at
each step.

 State Space Search: A higher branching factor means more

possible actions or state transitions.

3
 Search Tree

 Decision Tree: The branching factor at a decision node is

determined by the number of possible values or conditions in the
decision criteria.

6. Height:

 Definition: The number of edges on the longest path from the root
node to any leaf node. The height of the tree defines the worst-case
depth of search or decision-making.

 State Space Search: The height can be used to assess the

complexity of finding a solution.

 Decision Tree: In a decision tree for classification or regression, the

height represents the number of decisions required to reach an
outcome.

7. Balanced vs. Unbalanced:

 Balanced Tree: A tree where all leaf nodes are at the same depth,
ensuring efficient searches and decision-making. In a balanced state
space search tree, every node explores approximately the same
number of subsequent states.

 Unbalanced Tree: A tree where some branches are deeper than

others, which could make search or decision processes less efficient.
In state space search, an unbalanced tree can indicate inefficient
exploration of the solution space.

8. Solution Space:

 State Space Search: The leaf nodes represent possible solutions

to a problem or dead-ends. Finding an optimal solution might require
searching through many potential paths.

 Decision Tree: Leaf nodes represent classification outcomes or

predicted values.

Transformations in Search Trees

Transformations refer to operations or modifications that can be applied to

search trees in different contexts. In both state space search and decision
trees, transformations can be made for optimization, pruning, or altering
the way data is processed. Below are common transformations for both
models:

1. State Space Search Tree Transformations:

 Pruning:

4
 Search Tree

o Definition: The process of eliminating branches that are

unlikely to lead to a solution, effectively reducing the search
space.

o In Practice:

 In depth-first search (DFS), pruning can happen by

terminating branches that have already been explored.

 In algorithms like A*, pruning involves removing paths

with higher costs or less promising routes.

 State Space Reduction:

o Definition: Reducing the size of the state space by merging

equivalent states or eliminating redundant transitions.

o In Practice: This is commonly applied in problems like puzzle

solving, where a state might be revisited, and thus, the search
algorithm avoids redundant work by detecting previously
explored states.

 Heuristic Transformations:

o Definition: The use of heuristics (estimates of the cost or

steps to reach the goal) to transform the tree structure for
more efficient search.

o In Practice: Heuristics are used in A* or greedy search

algorithms to prioritize exploring more promising paths first.

 Backtracking:

o Definition: A form of transformation where, after reaching a

dead-end or failure to find a goal state, the algorithm steps
back to explore alternate possibilities.

o In Practice: Used extensively in DFS or constraint satisfaction

problems (like n-queens).

2. Decision Tree Transformations:

 Pruning:

o Definition: In decision trees, pruning involves removing

nodes (decisions) that provide little value, such as branches
that have low significance in classification or prediction
accuracy.

o In Practice: Pruning can help in avoiding overfitting by

simplifying the model, making it more generalizable. Common

5
 Search Tree

pruning techniques include cost-complexity pruning and

post-pruning (removing branches after the tree has been
fully grown).

 Feature Selection:

o Definition: Selecting only the most relevant features for

decision-making can simplify the tree and improve its
efficiency.

o In Practice: Decision trees often use algorithms like ID3,

C4.5, or CART, which select the best feature (based on criteria
like information gain or Gini impurity) at each node.
Transforming the tree can involve adjusting the features used
in each split.

 Transformation to Random Forests or Gradient Boosting:

o Definition: These methods combine multiple decision trees to

improve performance, often by reducing overfitting and
improving prediction accuracy.

o In Practice: Random forests involve training multiple decision

trees on different subsets of the data and averaging their
predictions. Gradient boosting involves training decision trees
sequentially, where each tree corrects the errors of the
previous one.

 Tree Rotation:

o Definition: A transformation that involves changing the

structure of a tree by rotating subtrees to improve efficiency
in terms of classification accuracy or model simplicity.

o In Practice: This operation is rarely used explicitly in common

decision tree algorithms but is relevant in some advanced
optimization techniques.

Summary of Key Transformations:

Transformation State Space

Decision Tree
Type Search Tree

Removes
Removes irrelevant branches to
Pruning unpromising
prevent overfitting
branches

State Space Reduces redundant

Not directly applicable
Reduction states

6
 Search Tree

Transformation State Space

Decision Tree
Type Search Tree

Heuristic Uses heuristics to Optimizes decision criteria for

Transformation prioritize paths splits

Steps back to Not applicable, as decision trees

Backtracking explore alternate are typically not explored like
solutions search trees

Feature Not applicable Selects the most relevant features

Selection directly to split data

Rotates or restructures to improve

Tree Rotation Not applicable
efficiency

These properties and transformations can dramatically influence the

performance and outcome of algorithms that rely on search trees,
whether for problem-solving (state space search) or decision-making
(decision trees).

Height of a Search Tree

The height of a search tree refers to the length of the longest path from
the root node to any leaf node, where each path is counted by the number
of edges (or steps) between nodes. In other words, the height represents
the maximum depth of the tree.

 Root Node: The starting point of the tree.

 Leaf Nodes: The terminal nodes that do not have any children,
representing the end points of paths in the tree.

Formal Definition:

 Height of a tree: The height hh of a tree is defined as the number

of edges on the longest path from the root to a leaf node.

o If the tree only contains the root node, its height is 0.

o If there are multiple levels of nodes, the height is the length of

the longest path from the root to any leaf.

Example:

Consider a simple search tree:

/ \

B C
7
 Search Tree

/\ /\

D E F G

 The root node is A.

 The longest path from A to any leaf node is A → B → D (or A → C →

F, etc.), which has 2 edges. So, the height of this tree is 2.

In the Context of Different Types of Trees:

1. State Space Search Tree:

o In state space search trees, the height corresponds to the

maximum number of transitions or steps that need to be
taken to reach a goal state from the initial state.

o For example, in a depth-first search (DFS), the height of

the tree would define the maximum depth the algorithm
needs to explore before either finding a solution or
backtracking.

2. Decision Tree:

o In decision trees, the height corresponds to the number of

decisions (or splits) required to reach a classification or
prediction. A deeper tree can lead to more complex decision-
making processes.

o In practice, decision trees are often pruned to avoid

unnecessary depth (to prevent overfitting).

Importance of Tree Height:

1. Search Tree Algorithms:

o In algorithms like Breadth-First Search (BFS) or Depth-

First Search (DFS), the height of the tree helps determine
the time complexity.

o The time complexity for a BFS or DFS in a tree can be

influenced by the height of the tree. For example, in a
complete binary tree, the height would be O(log⁡n)O(\log n),
where nn is the number of nodes.

2. Efficiency Considerations:

o The height of a tree often affects the efficiency of search or

decision-making. A very tall tree (i.e., a high height) means
that an algorithm might need to explore many levels before

8
 Search Tree

reaching the solution, which can increase the computational

complexity.

o For decision trees, a large height might result in overfitting, as

the model becomes too specific to the training data, capturing
noise rather than general patterns.

3. Balancing the Tree:

o In various algorithms, balancing the tree (reducing its height)

can improve efficiency. For example:

 In search algorithms, a balanced tree might lead to

faster search times.

 In decision trees, balancing or pruning the tree

reduces the risk of overfitting and makes the model
simpler and more generalizable.

Summary:

 The height of a search tree is the length of the longest path from
the root to a leaf node.

 The height is important in determining the computational

complexity of search algorithms (like DFS or BFS).

 In decision trees, the height represents the number of splits needed

to make a decision or classification, and high height can sometimes
lead to overfitting if not managed properly.

The basic operations of find, insert, and delete are fundamental to

working with trees in computer science. These operations are commonly
applied in various tree data structures such as Binary Search Trees (BSTs),
AVL trees, or Red-Black trees. Below is an explanation of how these
operations work in the context of a Binary Search Tree (BST), which is
one of the most common search trees.

1. Find Operation

The find operation is used to search for a specific value (or node) in the
tree. In a Binary Search Tree (BST), this operation is efficient due to the
ordered structure of the tree.

Steps for Find:

 Start at the root node.

 If the value to be found is less than the current node’s value, move
to the left child.

9
 Search Tree

 If the value to be found is greater than the current node’s value,

move to the right child.

 Repeat the process recursively until:

o The value is found (i.e., the current node’s value matches the
target).

o You reach a null child (i.e., the value is not in the tree).

Example:

To find 30 in the tree:

50

/ \

30 70

/ \ /\

20 40 60 80

 Start at 50. Since 30 is less than 50, move to the left child (node
30).

 The value 30 is found.

Time Complexity:

 Average: O(log n) if the tree is balanced.

 Worst case: O(n) if the tree is highly unbalanced (e.g., a linked list).

2. Insert Operation

The insert operation adds a new node to the tree while maintaining the
binary search property. For a Binary Search Tree (BST), all nodes to the
left of a node are smaller, and all nodes to the right are larger.

Steps for Insert:

 Start at the root node.

 If the value to insert is less than the current node’s value, move to
the left child.

 If the value to insert is greater than the current node’s value, move
to the right child.

 Repeat the process until you find a null child (this is where the new
node will be inserted).
10
 Search Tree

 Insert the new node at the null position.

Example:

To insert 25 into the following tree:

50

/ \

30 70

/ \ /\

20 40 60 80

 Start at 50. Since 25 is less than 50, move to the left child (node
30).

 Since 25 is less than 30, move to the left child (node 20).

 Since 25 is greater than 20, insert 25 as the right child of 20.

The tree now becomes:

50

/ \

30 70

/ \ /\

20 40 60 80

25

Time Complexity:

 Average: O(log n) for a balanced tree.

 Worst case: O(n) for a highly unbalanced tree.

3. Delete Operation

The delete operation removes a node from the tree. Deleting a node in a
Binary Search Tree (BST) can be complex because the tree structure
must be maintained.

There are three cases to consider when deleting a node:

1. Node to be deleted has no children (leaf node):

11
 Search Tree

 Simply remove the node.

2. Node to be deleted has one child:

 Replace the node with its single child.

3. Node to be deleted has two children:

 Find the inorder successor (or inorder predecessor) of the node,

which is the smallest node in the right subtree (or largest node in
the left subtree).

 Copy the value of the inorder successor to the node.

 Delete the inorder successor (which will be in one of the first two
cases).

Example:

To delete 30 in the following tree:

50

/ \

30 70

/ \ /\

20 40 60 80

 The node 30 has two children: 20 and 40.

 Find the inorder successor (the smallest node in the right

subtree), which is 40.

 Replace 30 with 40.

 Delete the original 40 node (which has no children).

The tree now becomes:

50

/ \

40 70

/ /\

20 60 80

Time Complexity:

 Average: O(log n) for a balanced tree.

12
 Search Tree

 Worst case: O(n) for a highly unbalanced tree.

Summary of Operations:

Operati Time Complexity Time Complexity

Description
on (Average) (Worst Case)

Find Search for a node O(log n) O(n)

Add a new node to

Insert O(log n) O(n)
the tree

Remove a node from

Delete O(log n) O(n)
the tree

Key Points:

 The height of the tree greatly impacts the time complexity of

these operations. If the tree is balanced, operations are efficient
(O(log n)).

 In a unbalanced tree, these operations may degrade to O(n),

similar to a linked list.

 Balancing techniques, like AVL trees or Red-Black trees, ensure

that the tree remains balanced, providing logarithmic time
complexity even in the worst case.

Returning from a leaf node to the root in a tree structure generally

refers to traversing back or backtracking from a leaf node upwards
towards the root. This concept is important in algorithms that involve
recursive searches or operations like pathfinding, backtracking, or tree
rebalancing.

In most search trees, such as binary search trees (BST), binary trees,
or other hierarchical structures, traversal is typically done from the root
to the leaf. However, in some cases, you may need to traverse
backwards from a leaf to the root (e.g., to trace a path or apply
operations from a leaf node upwards). Here’s how this process works:

1. Basic Concept of Returning from Leaf to Root

Returning from a leaf to the root means following the parent nodes
upward until you reach the root. This can be done if the tree structure
provides a way to access parent pointers or if you need to track your
path from the root down to a leaf node during a traversal.

2. Approaches for Traversing Backwards from Leaf to Root

13
 Search Tree

1. Using Parent Pointers:

In many tree structures, each node can store a reference or pointer to its
parent node. This allows you to backtrack from the leaf to the root.

 Step 1: Start at the leaf node.

 Step 2: Move upwards to the parent node by following the parent

pointer.

 Step 3: Continue moving upwards through the parent nodes until

you reach the root (which will have a null parent pointer).

Example:

Consider the following tree with parent pointers:

50

/ \

30 70

/ \ /\

20 40 60 80

To traverse from leaf node 20 to the root:

1. Start at node 20 (leaf node).

2. Move to the parent node 30.

3. Move to the parent node 50 (root).

You have now traversed from leaf 20 to root 50.

2. Using a Stack (for Non-recursive Traversal):

In cases where you don’t have parent pointers, you may need to store
the path from the root to the leaf while traversing the tree. A stack can
be used for this purpose.

 Step 1: Perform a depth-first traversal (DFS) or any other

search, keeping track of the nodes visited.

 Step 2: Once the leaf node is reached, the stack will contain the
path from the root to the leaf.

 Step 3: By popping elements from the stack, you can return from
the leaf to the root.

Example:

14
 Search Tree

In a DFS, you push nodes onto the stack as you go deeper into the tree.
Once a leaf node is reached, you can pop the nodes off the stack to move
back to the root.

3. Using Recursion (Backtracking):

When using recursion for tree traversal, the function call stack inherently
keeps track of the path. When the recursive function reaches the leaf
node and begins to return, it will backtrack through the recursive calls,
effectively moving from the leaf to the root.

 Step 1: Start the recursive function from the root.

 Step 2: As the recursion proceeds down the tree, the function calls
"push" onto the call stack.

 Step 3: Once the leaf is reached, the recursive function starts

returning, popping off the call stack as it goes back, effectively
returning from leaf to root.

3. Applications of Returning from Leaf to Root

1. Path Tracing:

o In many algorithms, you may need to find or trace a path from

a leaf to the root. This is commonly used in problems like:

 Finding the path in a tree.

 Tracing the ancestry of a node.

 Finding common ancestors (in algorithms like Lowest

Common Ancestor (LCA)).

2. Backtracking Algorithms:

o In algorithms like Depth-First Search (DFS), backtracking

involves returning from a leaf node to the root (or to the point
where a valid branch was found).

3. Rebalancing a Tree:

o In trees like AVL trees or Red-Black trees, rotations or

rebalancing operations may require moving from a leaf node
back to the root in order to adjust the tree structure, ensuring
it remains balanced.

4. Updating Values:

o In some algorithms, after reaching a leaf node, you may need

to propagate values or updates back to the root (e.g.,

15
 Search Tree

updating heights in AVL trees or propagating path costs in

pathfinding algorithms).

Example: Path Finding in a Binary Search Tree (BST)

If you want to trace the path from a leaf node back to the root, for
example, from a node with value 25 in the following BST:

50

/ \

30 70

/ \ /\

20 40 60 80

25

1. Start at node 25 (leaf node).

2. Move to its parent node 20.

3. Move to the parent node 30.

4. Move to the root node 50.

Thus, the path from leaf 25 to root 50 is: 25 → 20 → 30 → 50.

4. Time Complexity

 Using parent pointers: The time complexity for returning from a

leaf to the root is O(h)O(h), where hh is the height of the tree, since
you only move from the leaf up to the root.

 Using recursion or DFS with stack: Similarly, the time

complexity for backtracking from a leaf to the root is O(h)O(h),
where hh is the height of the tree.

Summary:

 Returning from a leaf to the root involves moving up through

the tree's nodes, typically by following parent pointers or using a
stack for path tracking.

 This concept is used in algorithms that involve pathfinding,

backtracking, tree rebalancing, and propagating updates.

 The process can be done in O(h) time, where hh is the height of the
tree.

16
 Search Tree

When dealing with non-unique keys in a tree, it means that the tree may
allow multiple nodes to have the same value. This situation can arise in a
variety of data structures such as binary search trees (BST), AVL
trees, Red-Black trees, or even tries. When keys are not unique, we
need to handle the insertion, deletion, and search operations in such a
way that multiple nodes with the same key are allowed and the tree
structure remains consistent.

Common Approaches for Dealing with Non-Unique Keys:

1. Allow Multiple Nodes with the Same Key:

o In this approach, we don't enforce any restrictions on the key,

meaning that multiple nodes in the tree can have the same
value.

o This approach works well in multi-set or multimap

implementations, where multiple identical values are
acceptable.

2. Allow Duplicates in the Left or Right Subtree:

o In a binary search tree (BST), when a duplicate key is

inserted, we can either insert the duplicate into the left or
right subtree (or both). This depends on the chosen rule for
handling duplicates.

o Common strategies:

 Insert duplicates to the right of the existing node.

 Insert duplicates to the left of the existing node.

 Insert duplicates at a specified position (depending

on the algorithm’s design).

3. Track the Frequency of the Key:

o Instead of inserting multiple nodes with the same value, we

can modify the structure of the node to store a count or
frequency of how many times that value occurs.

o This method reduces the number of nodes, as the same key

will be stored in a single node with a counter to indicate the
frequency.

1. Allowing Multiple Nodes with the Same Key

In a traditional binary search tree (BST), the basic property is that:

 Left child values are less than the parent node value.

17
 Search Tree

 Right child values are greater than the parent node value.

When dealing with non-unique keys, we modify the rule slightly to allow
duplicates:

 You can choose to insert duplicates in the right subtree or left

subtree of the node with the same key.

Example: If the tree is:

50

/ \

30 70

/ \

20 40

If you insert a node with value 30 again, you might choose to insert it into
the right subtree (or the left subtree if you prefer).

After inserting another 30 to the right:

50

/ \

30 70

/ \

20 40

30

 Find operation: In this case, when searching for the key 30, you
would need to follow the tree rules until the key is found. If
duplicates are allowed in the right or left subtrees, you can keep
searching until all occurrences of 30 are found.

2. Tracking the Frequency of the Key

Instead of allowing multiple nodes with the same key, you can modify
each node to store an integer counter, which represents how many times
that value appears in the tree.

Example: You might store nodes like this:

 Each node has the key value (e.g., 30).

18
 Search Tree

 Each node also has a count field, which keeps track of how many
times this key has been inserted.

For example:

50

/ \

30 70

/ \

20 40

If you insert 30 twice, the tree might look like:

50

/ \

30(2) 70

/ \

20 40

The count for node 30 is now 2, indicating that the key 30 appears twice
in the tree. This method keeps the tree structure more balanced and
efficient, as you avoid creating multiple nodes for the same key. However,
it does introduce a small overhead of maintaining the frequency count in
each node.

3. Handling Duplicates in Tree Variants (e.g., AVL, Red-Black

Trees)

In balanced tree structures like AVL trees or Red-Black trees, the

handling of non-unique keys may require some additional considerations:

AVL Trees:

 The basic AVL tree properties remain the same (i.e., left child’s value
is smaller, and right child’s value is larger).

 Duplicates can be inserted into the left or right subtree based on

the chosen rule.

 Balancing operations like rotations will still work as long as you

maintain the tree’s balance factor. The key idea is that duplicates
don’t violate the balance factor, but care must be taken in balancing
the tree correctly after insertion or deletion.

Red-Black Trees:

19
 Search Tree

 Red-Black trees are more flexible in terms of allowing duplicate

keys. As with regular binary search trees, you can decide whether
duplicates should go to the left or right.

 Insertions of duplicate keys are generally done into the right

subtree, but some implementations allow them in the left subtree
as well.

 The properties of Red-Black trees (such as balancing the tree with

rotations) remain unaffected by allowing duplicate keys, as long as
proper balancing operations are performed after insertions.

4. Alternative Tree Structures for Non-Unique Keys

Sometimes, other data structures may be more appropriate than

traditional trees for handling non-unique keys. These include:

 Multi-set (or bag): A data structure specifically designed to allow

duplicate values. It can be implemented using balanced binary
trees, hash tables, or other structures.

 Multi-map: A type of map or dictionary where multiple values can

be associated with the same key. This is typically implemented using
a balanced tree structure or a hash table with lists.

Time Complexity for Non-Unique Keys:

 Find: The time complexity remains O(log n) for balanced trees (like
AVL or Red-Black trees), even when duplicates are allowed. This is
because the tree structure is maintained, and the search operation
proceeds down the tree similarly to a standard search.

 Insert: The insertion of duplicates (whether to the left or right

subtree) is still O(log n) for balanced trees.

 Delete: Deleting a node with duplicates requires finding the node

and handling the duplicate values properly. The complexity of this
operation remains O(log n) for balanced trees.

Summary:

 Non-unique keys can be handled in several ways, including:

1. Allowing duplicates in the left or right subtrees.

2. Storing a frequency counter in the node itself.

3. Using data structures like multi-sets or multi-maps that

explicitly support duplicate values.

20
 Search Tree

 The chosen strategy affects the tree's structure and the behavior of
operations like insertion, deletion, and searching.

When we talk about queries for keys in a tree structure, we are

referring to operations or searches that allow us to find or manipulate keys
based on their values or properties. In an internal tree context, such
queries typically refer to querying nodes that are internal in the tree (i.e.,
non-leaf nodes), as opposed to leaf nodes. Queries for keys in an internal
node often involve tasks like searching for keys, counting occurrences,
range queries, or finding specific properties of the tree.

Types of Queries on Keys in Internal Nodes:

1. Find/Search for a Specific Key

2. Count the Number of Occurrences of a Key

3. Range Queries

4. Find the Minimum or Maximum Key

5. Find the Predecessor/Successor of a Key

6. Path Queries

7. Update Queries

Let's explore each of these queries in detail, assuming we are working

with a binary search tree (BST), which is one of the most common tree
structures used for key-based operations.

1. Find/Search for a Specific Key

The search operation is the most fundamental query in a tree, where the
goal is to find a node containing a specific key.

Algorithm for Find:

 Start at the root.

 If the key to find is less than the current node's key, move to the
left child.

 If the key to find is greater than the current node's key, move to
the right child.

 If the key is found at any internal node, return the node.

 If you reach a null child (leaf), the key is not in the tree.

Example:

21
 Search Tree

In the tree:

50

/ \

30 70

/ \ /\

20 40 60 80

If you want to find the key 40:

 Start at node 50 (root), since 40 is less than 50, move to the left
child 30.

 Since 40 is greater than 30, move to the right child 40, which is the
target.

2. Count the Number of Occurrences of a Key

If your tree allows non-unique keys, it may be useful to track the

number of times a key occurs in the tree. Instead of storing multiple
identical nodes, you could store a count or frequency at the internal
node where the key exists.

Algorithm for Counting Occurrences:

 Perform the search operation to find the node with the key.

 Once the node is found, simply return the count stored in that node
(if using a frequency counter).

Example:

For a tree where key 30 appears twice, you may store a node like:

30(2)

This indicates that key 30 appears twice in the tree. You can modify the
insertion logic to update the count when duplicates are inserted.

3. Range Queries

A range query is a query that finds all keys within a certain range (for
example, all keys between x and y). Range queries are efficient in search
trees like BSTs because of their ordered structure.

Algorithm for Range Query:

 Start at the root and traverse the tree.

22
 Search Tree

 For each node, if its key is within the specified range, it should be
included in the result.

 If the node's key is less than the lower bound of the range, skip its
left subtree (as all keys in the left subtree will also be less).

 If the node's key is greater than the upper bound of the range, skip
its right subtree.

Example:

For the tree:

50

/ \

30 70

/ \ /\

20 40 60 80

If you want to find keys between 30 and 70, the keys in this range are 30,
40, 50, 60. You would start at the root and only visit subtrees that are
relevant to the range.

4. Find the Minimum or Maximum Key

Finding the minimum and maximum key in a BST is an important

operation. The minimum key is the leftmost node, and the maximum
key is the rightmost node.

Algorithm:

 Minimum: Start at the root and keep moving to the left child until
you reach a node with no left child.

 Maximum: Start at the root and keep moving to the right child
until you reach a node with no right child.

Example:

For the tree:

50

/ \

30 70

/ \ /\

20 40 60 80

23
 Search Tree

 The minimum key is 20 (leftmost node).

 The maximum key is 80 (rightmost node).

5. Find the Predecessor/Successor of a Key

The predecessor of a node is the largest key that is smaller than the
current node's key, and the successor is the smallest key that is larger
than the current node's key.

Algorithm for Predecessor/Successor:

 Predecessor: If the node has a left child, the predecessor is the

maximum key in the left subtree. If the node has no left child, the
predecessor is the nearest ancestor whose right child is an
ancestor of the node.

 Successor: If the node has a right child, the successor is the

minimum key in the right subtree. If the node has no right child,
the successor is the nearest ancestor whose left child is an
ancestor of the node.

Example:

For the tree:

50

/ \

30 70

/ \ /\

20 40 60 80

 The predecessor of 40 is 30.

 The successor of 40 is 50.

6. Path Queries

A path query involves finding a path from a given node to the root or
between two nodes. This is useful in operations like ancestor queries or
finding the Lowest Common Ancestor (LCA).

Algorithm for Path Query:

 From node to root: Start at the given node and trace upwards to
the root, visiting each ancestor node.

 Between two nodes: To find the path between two nodes, trace
the path from each node to the root, then find their Lowest

24
 Search Tree

Common Ancestor (LCA) and trace the paths back down to the
nodes.

7. Update Queries

Update queries involve modifying the key or properties associated with a

node. For instance, this could mean updating the value of a key, updating
the frequency of a key (in case of duplicates), or changing the structure of
the tree.

Algorithm for Update Queries:

 Update the key: In some trees, you may need to search for a key,
then remove the old key and insert the updated key.

 Update the frequency: If you're tracking the frequency of a key,

simply update the count stored at the node when a duplicate is
inserted or deleted.

Time Complexity:

 Find/Search: O(log n) for balanced trees (like AVL, Red-Black), but

O(n) for unbalanced trees.

 Count Occurrences: O(log n) for balanced trees, O(n) for

unbalanced trees.

 Range Queries: O(k + log n), where k is the number of elements in

the range.

 Minimum/Maximum: O(log n) for balanced trees.

 Predecessor/Successor: O(log n) for balanced trees.

 Path Queries: O(log n) in the worst case for balanced trees.

 Update Queries: O(log n) for balanced trees.

Summary:

 Queries for keys in an internal node of a tree can involve a variety of

operations like finding a specific key, counting occurrences, range
queries, finding the minimum/maximum, predecessors/successors,
or path queries.

 Efficient handling of these queries often depends on the tree’s

structure and whether it is balanced (e.g., AVL, Red-Black trees) or
unbalanced (e.g., standard binary search trees).

25
 Search Tree

Building optimal search trees is an important concept in computer

science, particularly in the context of searching and retrieving
information efficiently. The goal of building an optimal search tree is to
minimize the expected search cost in a dynamic set of keys, based on
the frequencies with which different keys are accessed.

In an optimal search tree, we aim to organize the keys in such a way

that frequently accessed keys are found quickly, thereby minimizing the
overall search time across all queries.

Key Concepts

1. Binary Search Tree (BST): In a basic binary search tree, the keys
are arranged in a way that allows for efficient search (logarithmic
time) in the average case. However, a general BST may not
necessarily be optimal in terms of minimizing the search time for a
set of keys with varying access frequencies.

2. Optimal Binary Search Tree (OBST): An optimal binary search

tree arranges the keys so that the expected search cost is
minimized. The search cost is typically defined as the average
depth of the nodes, weighted by the frequency of accesses.

3. Expected Search Cost: The expected search cost (or expected

number of comparisons) for a search in a tree is calculated as the
weighted sum of the depths of the nodes, where the weight is the
frequency of access for that key.

Problem Formulation

Given:

 A set of keys k1,k2,…,knk_1, k_2, \dots, k_n to be stored in a binary

search tree.

 Each key kik_i has an associated frequency fif_i that indicates how
often the key is accessed.

The goal is to build a binary search tree in which the expected search
cost is minimized. The expected search cost for a key kik_i in the tree is
proportional to its depth in the tree, and the total expected search cost is:

E(C)=∑i=1nfi×depth(ki)E(C) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} f_i \times \text{depth}

(k_i)

Where:

 fif_i is the frequency of access for key kik_i.

26
 Search Tree

 depth(ki)\text{depth}(k_i) is the depth (distance from the root) of

node kik_i in the tree.

Approach: Dynamic Programming (DP)

Building an optimal binary search tree can be solved efficiently using

dynamic programming. The idea is to use the frequency table to
calculate the best structure for the tree, minimizing the total expected
search cost.

Steps to Build an Optimal Search Tree:

1. Define the Problem Substructure: Let C(i,j)C(i, j) represent the

minimum expected search cost of the subtree containing the
keys ki,ki+1,…,kjk_i, k_{i+1}, \dots, k_j. We need to find the tree
that minimizes the cost over all possible subtree configurations.

2. Base Case: The cost of a subtree containing no keys (i.e., an empty

subtree) is zero:

C(i,i−1)=0for alliC(i, i-1) = 0 \quad \text{for all} \quad i

3. Recursive Relation: To construct the optimal tree for the subtree

with keys kik_i through kjk_j, consider each key krk_r (where i≤r≤ji \
leq r \leq j) as the root of the subtree. The root divides the subtree
into two parts:

o The left subtree contains the keys ki,ki+1,…,kr−1k_i, k_{i+1},

\dots, k_{r-1}.

o The right subtree contains the keys kr+1,kr+2,…,kjk_{r+1},

k_{r+2}, \dots, k_j.

The total cost for choosing krk_r as the root is:

Cost of subtree=C(i,r−1)+C(r+1,j)+sum of frequencies from ki to kj\

text{Cost of subtree} = C(i, r-1) + C(r+1, j) + \text{sum of frequencies
from } k_i \text{ to } k_j

The sum of frequencies from kik_i to kjk_j is:

W(i,j)=fi+fi+1+⋯+fjW(i, j) = f_i + f_{i+1} + \dots + f_j

Thus, the recursive formula for C(i,j)C(i, j) is:

C(i,j)=min⁡i≤r≤j(C(i,r−1)+C(r+1,j)+W(i,j))C(i, j) = \min_{i \leq r \leq j} \left(

C(i, r-1) + C(r+1, j) + W(i, j) \right)

This formula ensures that we calculate the optimal cost for each subtree,
choosing the root that minimizes the expected search cost.

27
 Search Tree

4. Final Solution: The final solution, which gives the optimal search
tree for the entire set of keys, is stored in C(1,n)C(1, n), where nn is
the number of keys.

Algorithm for Building the Optimal Search Tree

1. Step 1: Set up a table C[i][j]C[i][j] where C[i][j]C[i][j] stores the

minimum expected search cost for the subtree from kik_i to kjk_j.

2. Step 2: Set up a table W[i][j]W[i][j] where W[i][j]W[i][j] stores the

sum of the frequencies from kik_i to kjk_j.

3. Step 3: Use the recursive relation to fill in the values of C[i][j]C[i][j],

starting with the base case and expanding the problem to larger
subtrees.

4. Step 4: Reconstruct the tree from the table C[i][j]C[i][j] to

determine the structure of the optimal tree.

Example

Let’s consider a simple example where we have the following keys and
frequencies:

Frequen
Key
cy

k1k_
34
1

k2k_
8
2

k3k_
50
3

k4k_
19
4

We want to build an optimal search tree for these keys.

1. First, compute the sum of frequencies W(i,j)W(i, j) for each possible

range of keys.

2. Then, use the recursive relation to fill out the cost table C(i,j)C(i, j).

3. Finally, use the information in the table to reconstruct the optimal

tree structure.

Time Complexity
28
 Search Tree

The time complexity of the dynamic programming approach for

building an optimal search tree is O(n3)O(n^3), where nn is the number of
keys. This is because:

 Calculating the cost for each subtree takes O(n2)O(n^2) time.

 For each pair of nodes ii and jj, we compute the optimal root, which
requires checking each potential root between ii and jj, resulting in
O(n)O(n) work for each pair.

Thus, the total time complexity is O(n3)O(n^3).

Approximate Solutions and Heuristic Methods

In practice, for large datasets, the dynamic programming solution may be

too slow. In such cases, approximation algorithms or heuristic
methods (such as greedy algorithms or balanced tree
constructions) can be used to build sub-optimal but efficient search
trees.

Summary

 Optimal search trees minimize the expected search cost based

on access frequencies of the keys.

 The problem can be solved using dynamic programming, where

we recursively calculate the minimum expected search cost for each
subtree and then use this information to build the optimal tree.

 The time complexity of the optimal search tree algorithm is

O(n3)O(n^3).

 For large datasets, approximate methods can be used for faster

construction of search trees.

Converting trees into lists is a common task in computer science, often

used for purposes like serialization, flattening, or transforming
hierarchical structures into linear ones. Depending on the tree structure
and the intended purpose, the conversion can vary. The most common
types of conversions involve traversals of the tree, where the tree is
"flattened" into a list in different orders: pre-order, in-order, post-
order, and level-order.

Types of Tree Traversals

1. Pre-order Traversal

29
 Search Tree

o In pre-order traversal, the tree is processed in the order:

root → left subtree → right subtree.

o This means the root is visited first, followed by the left child,
and then the right child.

2. In-order Traversal

o In in-order traversal, the tree is processed in the order: left

subtree → root → right subtree.

o This traversal is particularly useful for binary search trees

(BSTs), as it returns the keys in sorted order.

3. Post-order Traversal

o In post-order traversal, the tree is processed in the order:

left subtree → right subtree → root.

o This traversal is commonly used in situations like evaluating

expressions in expression trees or deleting nodes.

4. Level-order Traversal (Breadth-First Search)

o In level-order traversal, the tree is processed level by level,

starting from the root and moving down to each level in turn.

o This is typically implemented using a queue and is commonly

used in problems like finding the shortest path in
unweighted graphs.

1. Pre-order Traversal (Root → Left → Right)

In a pre-order traversal, the root node is visited first, then the left child,
and finally the right child. If we want to convert a tree into a list using pre-
order traversal, the algorithm would look like this:

Pre-order Algorithm:

1. Visit the root node.

2. Traverse the left subtree.

3. Traverse the right subtree.

Python Example:

class TreeNode:

def __init__(self, key):

self.val = key

30
 Search Tree

self.left = None

self.right = None

def preorder(root):

result = []

if root:

result.append(root.val) # Visit root

result.extend(preorder(root.left)) # Visit left subtree

result.extend(preorder(root.right)) # Visit right subtree

return result

# Example tree

root = TreeNode(1)

root.left = TreeNode(2)

root.right = TreeNode(3)

root.left.left = TreeNode(4)

root.left.right = TreeNode(5)

# Convert tree to list using pre-order traversal

preorder_list = preorder(root)

print(preorder_list) # Output: [1, 2, 4, 5, 3]

2. In-order Traversal (Left → Root → Right)

In an in-order traversal, the left subtree is processed first, then the

root node, followed by the right subtree. This traversal is particularly
useful for binary search trees (BSTs), where it produces a sorted list of
the tree's keys.

In-order Algorithm:

1. Traverse the left subtree.

2. Visit the root node.

3. Traverse the right subtree.

31
 Search Tree

Python Example:

def inorder(root):

result = []

if root:

result.extend(inorder(root.left)) # Visit left subtree

result.append(root.val) # Visit root

result.extend(inorder(root.right)) # Visit right subtree

return result

# Convert tree to list using in-order traversal

inorder_list = inorder(root)

print(inorder_list) # Output: [4, 2, 5, 1, 3]

3. Post-order Traversal (Left → Right → Root)

In a post-order traversal, the left and right subtrees are processed first,
and the root node is visited last. This traversal is useful in cases like
evaluating expressions or deleting nodes.

Post-order Algorithm:

1. Traverse the left subtree.

2. Traverse the right subtree.

3. Visit the root node.

Python Example:

def postorder(root):

result = []

if root:

result.extend(postorder(root.left)) # Visit left subtree

result.extend(postorder(root.right)) # Visit right subtree

result.append(root.val) # Visit root

return result

# Convert tree to list using post-order traversal

32
 Search Tree

postorder_list = postorder(root)

print(postorder_list) # Output: [4, 5, 2, 3, 1]

4. Level-order Traversal (Breadth-First Search)

In level-order traversal, the nodes are visited level by level. This is done
by using a queue to traverse the tree. The root node is processed first,
followed by its children, and then their children, and so on.

Level-order Algorithm:

1. Start with the root node in the queue.

2. Dequeue a node, visit it, and enqueue its children.

3. Continue this process until the queue is empty.

Python Example:

from collections import deque

def level_order(root):

result = []

if not root:

return result

queue = deque([root])

while queue:

node = queue.popleft()

result.append(node.val)

if node.left:

queue.append(node.left)

if node.right:

queue.append(node.right)

return result

33
 Search Tree

# Convert tree to list using level-order traversal

level_order_list = level_order(root)

print(level_order_list) # Output: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

When to Use Each Traversal

 Pre-order traversal: Useful when you want to copy a tree or when

the root must be processed before the children (e.g., serialization of
a tree).

 In-order traversal: Useful in binary search trees (BSTs) to get a

sorted list of keys.

 Post-order traversal: Useful when the children must be processed

before the root, such as in evaluating expressions or deleting
nodes.

 Level-order traversal: Useful when you need to process nodes

level by level, such as in breadth-first search (BFS) or when
converting a tree to a list in order of proximity from the root.

Time Complexity

 Pre-order, In-order, and Post-order Traversals: All of these

traversals have a time complexity of O(n), where nn is the number
of nodes in the tree.

 Level-order Traversal: Also has a time complexity of O(n), since

each node is enqueued and dequeued once.

Summary

Converting trees into lists is a useful operation for many tasks, such as
tree serialization, search optimizations, or just flattening the hierarchical
structure. The traversal order (pre-order, in-order, post-order, or level-
order) determines how the tree is converted into the list, each having
different use cases depending on the desired output.

Removing a tree typically refers to deleting a tree and all of its nodes
from memory. This operation is important in scenarios where you no
longer need a tree structure, such as when clearing a data structure,
deallocating memory, or performing cleanup in applications like game
engines or simulations.

In terms of implementation, removing a tree can mean different things

depending on the context:

1. Memory Deallocation: This involves freeing up the memory used

by the tree and its nodes.
34
 Search Tree

2. Recursive Node Deletion: In most tree structures, this is done by

recursively traversing the tree and deleting each node (typically in
post-order), starting from the leaf nodes and working back to the
root.

3. Tree Destruction: This ensures that all references to the tree are
cleared, and all nodes are deleted properly.

General Approach to Removing a Tree (Deleting All Nodes)

The process of removing a tree is generally done by recursively

deleting all nodes. If we're dealing with a binary tree, we need to delete
each node and its left and right children (if they exist).

Steps:

1. Start from the root: Begin at the root node of the tree.

2. Recursively delete the left subtree: Before deleting the root,

make sure the left child and all its descendants are deleted.

3. Recursively delete the right subtree: Do the same for the right
child and its descendants.

4. Delete the current node: Once both subtrees have been

removed, delete the current node.

5. Memory Deallocation: After all nodes have been deleted, the

tree's memory should be freed. In languages like C++, this would
involve explicitly freeing the memory, while in languages like
Python, the garbage collector handles memory management
automatically.

Example in C++ (Manual Memory Management)

In C++, we need to explicitly manage memory allocation and

deallocation. The delete operator is used to free the memory used by each
node.

#include <iostream>

class TreeNode {

public:

int val;

TreeNode* left;

TreeNode* right;

35
 Search Tree

TreeNode(int value) : val(value), left(nullptr), right(nullptr) {}

};

void deleteTree(TreeNode* root) {

if (root == nullptr) {

return;

// Recursively delete left and right subtrees

deleteTree(root->left);

deleteTree(root->right);

// Delete the current node

delete root;

int main() {

// Create a simple binary tree

TreeNode* root = new TreeNode(1);

root->left = new TreeNode(2);

root->right = new TreeNode(3);

root->left->left = new TreeNode(4);

root->left->right = new TreeNode(5);

// Delete the tree

deleteTree(root);

return 0;

36
 Search Tree

In this example:

 The deleteTree function is used to recursively delete all nodes in the

tree.

 It starts by deleting the left and right subtrees before deleting the
root node.

 Finally, it calls delete on each node to deallocate memory.

Example in Python (Automatic Garbage Collection)

In Python, memory management is automatic via garbage collection,

so you don't need to explicitly free memory. When a node is no longer
referenced, Python will automatically reclaim the memory. However, we
can still delete the tree by setting all references to None and allowing
Python to handle cleanup.

class TreeNode:

def __init__(self, value):

self.val = value

self.left = None

self.right = None

def delete_tree(root):

if root is None:

return

# Recursively delete left and right subtrees

delete_tree(root.left)

delete_tree(root.right)

# Set the current node to None (removes reference to it)

root = None

# Create a simple binary tree

37
 Search Tree

root = TreeNode(1)

root.left = TreeNode(2)

root.right = TreeNode(3)

root.left.left = TreeNode(4)

root.left.right = TreeNode(5)

# Delete the tree

delete_tree(root)

In this example:

 The delete_tree function recursively deletes the left and right

subtrees.

 Setting the root to None ensures that Python's garbage collector will
clean up the tree nodes when no references to them remain.

Time Complexity

 The time complexity of removing a tree is O(n), where nn is the

number of nodes in the tree. This is because each node is visited
once during the traversal, and each node is deleted.

Considerations

1. Avoid Memory Leaks (in languages like C++): In manual memory

management languages like C++, it's crucial to ensure that every
allocated node is properly deallocated. Forgetting to delete a node
could result in memory leaks.

2. Null References: After deleting a node, it’s important to ensure

that there are no dangling references to that node. This is
particularly important in languages like C++ and Java. In Python,
setting the root or any references to None will help ensure that the
garbage collector can reclaim the memory.

3. Recursive Nature: The process of deleting a tree is recursive and

starts from the leaf nodes, working its way to the root. This ensures
that all child nodes are deleted before their parent nodes.

4. Edge Cases:

o If the tree is empty (i.e., the root is None), the function should
simply return without any operations.

38
 Search Tree

o If the tree contains only one node, it will be deleted after

visiting the root.

Summary

 Removing a tree means deleting all its nodes and freeing the
memory used by the tree structure.

 The process is typically done using a recursive approach, where

the left and right subtrees are deleted first, followed by the root
node.

 In C++, explicit memory deallocation is necessary (using delete),

while in Python, memory management is handled automatically by
the garbage collector.

 The time complexity of removing a tree is O(n), where nn is the

number of nodes in the tree.

Balanced search trees are designed to maintain a balance between their

height and the number of nodes in order to ensure efficient operations like
search, insert, and delete. In an unbalanced tree, the height can grow too
large, leading to inefficient operations (e.g., linear time complexity).
Balanced trees ensure that operations can be performed in logarithmic
time by keeping the tree height small.

There are several types of balanced search trees, including height-

balanced trees, weight-balanced trees, and more advanced
structures like (a, b)-trees and B-trees.

1. Height-balanced Trees (AVL Trees)

Height-balanced trees, such as AVL trees, maintain balance by

ensuring that the height difference (or balance factor) between the
left and right subtrees of any node is kept within a certain range.

 Balance Factor: The balance factor of a node is defined as:

Balance Factor=height of left subtree−height of right subtree\
text{Balance Factor} = \text{height of left subtree} - \text{height
of right subtree} For a tree to be balanced, the balance factor of
each node should be in the range of [-1, 1]. If the balance factor
goes outside this range, the tree needs to be rebalanced using
rotations.

Key Operations:

 Rotation: When an imbalance is detected (i.e., when the balance

factor exceeds 1 or -1), rotations are used to restore balance.

39
 Search Tree

o Single Left Rotation (LL Rotation): Used when the left

subtree is taller.

o Single Right Rotation (RR Rotation): Used when the right

subtree is taller.

o Left-Right (LR) Rotation: A combination of left and right

rotations, used when the left subtree has a right-heavy
imbalance.

o Right-Left (RL) Rotation: A combination of right and left

rotations, used when the right subtree has a left-heavy
imbalance.

Example:

 Inserting a node might trigger a rotation if the balance factor

becomes too large (e.g., greater than 1 or less than -1).

Time Complexity:

 Search, Insert, Delete: O(log n), where nn is the number of

nodes in the tree. Rotations are constant time operations, so even
with multiple rotations, the tree remains balanced with logarithmic
height.

2. Weight-balanced Trees

In weight-balanced trees, the balance of a node is determined by the

number of nodes (or weight) in its left and right subtrees, rather than
their heights. A node is balanced if the weight difference between its left
and right subtrees is within a specified range.

 Weight Balance Factor: Instead of using height, we define the

weight balance factor as:
Weight Balance Factor=number of nodes in left subtree−number of
nodes in right subtree\text{Weight Balance Factor} = \text{number
of nodes in left subtree} - \text{number of nodes in right subtree} If
the difference in the number of nodes exceeds a certain threshold,
the tree is rebalanced using rotations, similar to height-balanced
trees.

Key Operations:

 Insertion and Deletion: As in height-balanced trees, the insertion

and deletion operations are followed by checking and restoring
balance using rotations.

40
 Search Tree

 Rotations: Like AVL trees, rotations are used to restore balance

when the weight balance factor exceeds the allowable range.

Time Complexity:

 Search, Insert, Delete: O(log n), as the tree is kept balanced by

maintaining the weight factor.

3. (a, b)-Trees

The (a, b)-tree is a self-balancing search tree, specifically designed to

handle large sets of data by allowing internal nodes to store multiple
keys. This results in fewer levels in the tree, which can reduce the number
of disk accesses in applications like databases or file systems.

 a: The minimum number of keys a node can hold.

 b: The maximum number of keys a node can hold.

The tree is balanced by ensuring that:

 All leaf nodes are at the same level (height of the tree is balanced).

 Each internal node must have at least a children and at most b

children.

Key Properties:

 Each node (except for the root) must have at least a children and at
most b children.

 The root node must have at least 2 children unless it's a leaf.

 The number of keys in a node must be at least a-1 and at most b-1.

Operations:

 Insertion: Insertions into a node are done in a manner that

maintains the sorted order. If a node exceeds the b-limit, it is split
into two nodes, and the middle key is pushed up to the parent.

 Deletion: If a node has too few keys after deletion (fewer than a-1),
it is merged with its sibling or a key is borrowed from a sibling node.

Time Complexity:

 Search, Insert, Delete: O(log n), where nn is the number of keys

in the tree. The tree is balanced by maintaining the number of keys
in each node, ensuring logarithmic height.

4. B-Trees

41
 Search Tree

A B-tree is a generalization of the (a, b)-tree and is used widely in

databases and file systems. It is designed for efficient disk-based
storage, where each node can store multiple keys and pointers. B-trees
are similar to (a, b)-trees but with a focus on disk I/O efficiency by
reducing the height of the tree and minimizing the number of accesses
required.

Key Properties:

 Degree of the tree: Each node can store between t-1 and 2t-1
keys, where t is the minimum degree of the tree.

 Child nodes: Each internal node has between t and 2t children.

 All leaf nodes are at the same level, ensuring a balanced structure.

Operations:

 Insertion: Insertions are done by adding keys in the appropriate

node, splitting nodes when necessary.

 Deletion: Deletion involves removing keys from nodes and

redistributing or merging nodes to maintain the tree's properties.

Time Complexity:

 Search, Insert, Delete: O(log n), where nn is the number of keys

in the tree. The B-tree is balanced to ensure that the height remains
logarithmic, and it minimizes disk accesses by grouping multiple
keys per node.

Summary of Key Tree Structures

Number
Balancing Operati
Tree Type of Keys Use Cases
Criterion ons
per Node

General-purpose
Height- Height difference
search trees, e.g., for
balanced between left and 1 O(log n)
in-memory data
(AVL) right subtrees
structures

General-purpose
Number of nodes
Weight- search trees, focusing
(weight) in 1 O(log n)
balanced on balancing based on
subtrees
weight

(a, b)-Tree Min and max Between a Disk-based storage O(log n)

42
 Search Tree

Number
Balancing Operati
Tree Type of Keys Use Cases
Criterion ons
per Node

number of keys (e.g., databases, file

and b
in each node systems)

Min and max Disk-based storage,

Between t-
B-Tree number of keys large-scale database O(log n)
1 and 2t-1
in each node indexes

Conclusion

Balanced search trees like height-balanced trees (AVL), weight-

balanced trees, (a, b)-trees, and B-trees are critical for ensuring
efficient search, insertion, and deletion operations. By balancing the tree
structure in various ways, these trees ensure that the height of the tree
remains logarithmic, minimizing the time complexity of operations and
improving performance, particularly for large datasets.

Red-Black Trees

A Red-Black Tree is a type of self-balancing binary search tree

where each node has an extra color attribute (red or black) in addition
to the usual key and pointers. This color attribute helps the tree maintain
balance during insertions and deletions, ensuring that the tree remains
approximately balanced and its height is kept in check.

Key Properties of a Red-Black Tree:

A Red-Black Tree must satisfy the following properties:

1. Node Color: Every node is either red or black.

2. Root is Black: The root node is always black.

3. Red Nodes Cannot Be Adjacent: A red node cannot have a red

child (i.e., no two red nodes can be adjacent).

4. Black Height Consistency: Every path from a node to its

descendant NULL pointers (i.e., leaf nodes) must contain the same
number of black nodes.

5. Leaf Nodes are Black: The leaf nodes (NULL nodes) are
considered black.

These properties ensure that the tree remains balanced, which in turn
guarantees that the height of the tree is logarithmic relative to the
number of nodes in the tree.

43
 Search Tree

Height of a Red-Black Tree:

The height of a red-black tree is constrained by the following:

 A red-black tree with nn nodes has a height of at most 2log⁡2(n+1)2

\log_2(n+1).

 The number of black nodes on any path from the root to a leaf is
consistent, and the tree’s height is limited due to the alternating
black and red nodes. In the worst case, the height is twice the
black-height of the tree.

Insertion and Deletion:

Insertion and deletion in a Red-Black Tree are done in such a way that the
tree remains balanced after each operation. After each insertion or
deletion, the tree may become unbalanced, and several rotations (left or
right) along with color changes are used to restore balance.

 Insertion: A new node is always inserted as a red node. After

insertion, the tree may need to perform rebalancing using rotations
and color changes to restore the red-black properties.

 Deletion: When a node is deleted, if the deleted node causes an

imbalance in the red-black properties, the tree performs rotations
and color fixes to restore balance.

Time Complexity:

 Search, Insert, Delete: All operations (search, insertion, and

deletion) in a Red-Black Tree take O(log n) time, where nn is the
number of nodes in the tree, because the height of the tree is
guaranteed to be logarithmic.

Tree of Almost Optimal Height

A tree of almost optimal height refers to a type of tree that tries to

keep the height as close as possible to the minimum height allowed by the
number of nodes in the tree. The optimal height for a binary search tree
occurs when the tree is perfectly balanced, meaning each node has either
zero or two children, and the tree is as "full" as possible.

Minimal Height for a Binary Search Tree:

The minimal height of a binary search tree with nn nodes is

approximately log⁡2(n)\log_2(n). In a perfectly balanced tree, each level
of the tree is fully populated with nodes, which ensures that the tree has
the least possible height.

44
 Search Tree

However, in practice, it is often difficult to maintain perfect balance in a

dynamic tree, where nodes are being frequently inserted and deleted.
Red-Black Trees and AVL Trees are examples of trees that maintain a
height close to the optimal height while still allowing for efficient
insertions and deletions.

Almost Optimal Height:

 AVL Trees maintain strict balance by ensuring that the balance

factor (the difference in height between left and right subtrees) is at
most 1. This property guarantees that the height of an AVL tree is
always O(log n), which is almost optimal.

 Red-Black Trees allow a bit more flexibility than AVL trees (with
balance factors of -2, -1, 0, 1, and 2), but they still maintain the
height within O(log n), making them close to optimal in terms of
height.

In the case of red-black trees, while the balance is not as strict as AVL
trees, the constraints on node color and structure still ensure that the
height of the tree is logarithmic, keeping it close to optimal.

Comparison of Red-Black Trees and Other Balanced Trees

Property Red-Black Tree AVL Tree

More relaxed (red node can have Strict balance (balance

Balance
red child, as long as other factor of each node must
Condition
conditions are satisfied) be -1, 0, or 1)

Height At most 2log⁡2(n+1)2 \log_2(n+1) At most log⁡2(n)\log_2(n)

Insertion
O(log n) with rotations and color
Complexit O(log n) with rotations
changes
y

Deletion
O(log n) with rotations and color
Complexit O(log n) with rotations
changes
y

Space
Complexit O(n) O(n)
y

Preferred in applications where Preferred when search

insertion/deletion operations are operations are more
Use Case
frequent (e.g., balanced trees for frequent (e.g.,
associative containers) databases)

45
 Search Tree

Property Red-Black Tree AVL Tree

More strictly balanced for

Tree Less strict balancing, but good
better performance in
Structure enough for practical purposes
search

Summary

 Red-Black Trees are a type of self-balancing binary search

tree where each node is colored red or black. The tree maintains
balance through a set of rules that ensure the height of the tree
remains logarithmic, thus ensuring O(log n) time complexity for
insertion, deletion, and search operations.

 Height of Red-Black Tree: The height of a red-black tree is at

most twice the black height, meaning it is always O(log n).

 Trees of Almost Optimal Height: These trees, such as Red-Black

Trees and AVL Trees, maintain their height close to the optimal
logarithmic height through various balancing techniques.

o AVL Trees maintain stricter balance than Red-Black Trees and

also guarantee O(log n) height.

o Red-Black Trees are less strict but still maintain logarithmic

height and are more flexible when it comes to insertion and
deletion operations.

Both types of trees are used in different scenarios based on the need for
stricter balance (AVL) or more flexible balancing (Red-Black).

Top-Down Red-Black Tree Balancing

Top-down red-balancing refers to a method of rebalancing a red-black

tree during insertions, where the balancing process is performed as we
traverse down the tree to find the insertion point. This is in contrast to
bottom-up balancing, where the tree is rebalanced after the insertion is
completed by propagating changes up the tree.

In top-down red-balancing, as we traverse the tree from the root to the

leaf, we perform rotations and color flips to maintain the red-black tree
properties. This approach works well because we can handle imbalances
immediately as we encounter them during the insertion process, and we
avoid the need to propagate changes upwards, making the insertion
process faster.

Red-Black Tree Insertion

46
 Search Tree

To understand top-down red-balancing, we need to first review the

insertion process for a red-black tree. The insertion involves two main
tasks:

1. Normal Binary Search Tree (BST) Insertion: Insert the new node
in the appropriate position (as in a regular binary search tree),
ensuring that the binary search property is maintained.

2. Red-Black Tree Fix-up: After inserting the node, we need to fix

potential violations of the red-black tree properties, especially
property 4 (no two consecutive red nodes) and property 5 (same
black-height along all paths).

Top-Down Red-Balancing Steps

1. Insert the Node: Insert the new node as a red node (by default).
This is the first step in maintaining the property that newly inserted
nodes are always red.

2. Fix the Violations: After the node is inserted, we need to check

and fix any violations of the red-black properties, especially:

o Consecutive Red Nodes (Property 3): If a red node has a

red child, it violates the red-black property where no two red
nodes can be adjacent.

o Black-Height Consistency (Property 4): If there is any

inconsistency in the black height of paths, we need to fix that.

To fix these violations in top-down red-balancing, we perform the

following operations as we traverse from the root to the inserted node:

Steps for Top-Down Red-Balancing:

1. Initial Conditions: Start with the root of the tree. The root is
always black, so we do not have to worry about it being red.

2. Check for Red-Red Violation:

o If the parent node of the newly inserted node is red (i.e., the
violation of consecutive red nodes occurs), we perform a
recoloring or rotation to fix this violation.

3. Case 1: Both Parent and Uncle are Red (Recoloring):

o If the parent and the uncle of the newly inserted node are
both red, we perform a recoloring operation:

 Recoloring: Change the parent and the uncle to black,

and change the grandparent to red. This operation

47
 Search Tree

propagates the violation upwards, but it can be handled

by continuing the fix-up at the grandparent.

 After recoloring, the grandparent might violate the red-

black properties, so we move the insertion point to the
grandparent and continue fixing.

4. Case 2: Parent is Red, Uncle is Black or NULL (Rotation):

o If the parent is red and the uncle is black or NULL, we need to

perform rotations to maintain balance and satisfy the red-
black properties:

 If the inserted node is a left-right child or a right-left

child, perform a rotation to convert it into a left-left
or right-right situation.

 Then, perform the appropriate rotation on the

grandparent (either a left rotation or a right rotation)
to fix the imbalance.

5. Repeat: Continue checking the grandparent after performing a

rotation or recoloring. If necessary, move up the tree and repeat the
process until the tree is balanced.

Top-Down Fix-Up with Rotation

In top-down balancing, the tree is rebalanced as we traverse down the

tree. If a violation is detected (e.g., a red-red violation), we immediately
perform rotations or recoloring:

 Left Rotation: A left rotation is used when a right child needs to be

promoted to maintain the binary search tree property.

 Right Rotation: A right rotation is used when a left child needs to

be promoted.

These rotations are performed immediately when a violation is detected,

which makes the top-down approach efficient because we handle the
issue as soon as we encounter it.

Example of Top-Down Red-Black Tree Balancing:

Suppose we are inserting a node into a red-black tree, and the parent
node is red, which causes a violation. Here’s how top-down balancing
works:

1. Initial Insert: Insert the new node as a red node.

2. Parent and Uncle are Red: If the parent and uncle are both red,
we perform recoloring. This involves changing the parent and uncle
48
 Search Tree

to black, and changing the grandparent to red. Then we move the

insertion point up to the grandparent and continue checking.

3. Parent is Red, Uncle is Black: If the parent is red and the uncle is
black or NULL, we perform the necessary rotations to restore
balance.

Advantages of Top-Down Red-Balancing:

1. Efficient Insertion: In top-down balancing, as soon as a violation is

detected, it is fixed immediately. This reduces the number of
rotations needed compared to bottom-up methods.

2. Simplified Fix-Up: By handling the problem during the insertion

process, the need to propagate fixes upwards is eliminated.

3. Fewer Rotations: Top-down balancing can sometimes result in

fewer rotations because it handles violations as they occur rather
than waiting until later to propagate changes.

Comparison with Bottom-Up Red-Black Tree Fix-Up

In bottom-up red-black tree insertion, after inserting the node, the

tree is rebalanced by traversing upwards, fixing violations along the way.
In contrast, top-down red-balancing addresses violations as they occur
during the insertion process, making it potentially more efficient,
especially in terms of fewer rotations and quicker insertion times.

Top-Down Red-
Property Bottom-Up Red-Balancing
Balancing

Balancing Fixes violations as we

Fixes violations after insertion
Approach insert

Rotations Fewer rotations needed More rotations may be needed

Faster insertion Slightly slower (propagate fixes

Efficiency
(immediate fixes) upwards)

Easier to implement with More complex due to

Complexity
efficient handling propagation of fixes

More traditional approach,

Use Case Faster insertion and fixes
often simpler for theory

Summary

Top-down red-balancing is a strategy for maintaining the red-black tree

properties while inserting a new node. It is a more immediate way to
address violations of the red-black properties, performing necessary

49
 Search Tree

rotations and recoloring during the insertion process itself, rather than
after the node has been inserted. This can result in fewer rotations and
more efficient balancing, especially when handling violations of the red-
red property or black-height consistency.

50