Scribd
Upload
151 views3 pages

Action Research Evaluation Criteria

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for a national-level action research competition, detailing the weight and specific criteria for each section of the research report. Key sections include preliminary information, title clarity, introduction, methodology, data analysis, action strategy, implementation, evaluation, and additional requirements. Each criterion is designed to ensure the research is relevant, original, and contributes to improving student learning.

Uploaded by

chalehunegnaw12
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
151 views3 pages

Action Research Evaluation Criteria

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for a national-level action research competition, detailing the weight and specific criteria for each section of the research report. Key sections include preliminary information, title clarity, introduction, methodology, data analysis, action strategy, implementation, evaluation, and additional requirements. Each criterion is designed to ensure the research is relevant, original, and contributes to improving student learning.

Uploaded by

chalehunegnaw12
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

በአገር ዓቀፍ ደረጃ ለሚደረገው የተግባራዊ ምርምር ውድድር የማወዳደሪያ መስፈርት

ction Research Evaluation Criteria

No Section Weight Criteria

1. Preliminary section 3%  Has cover pages

 Has table of contents and appropriate pages

 Has list of tables & graphs (If any in the inside pages)

2. Title clarity and 5%  Researchable


relevance
 It is a real action research title

 Related with own duty (field )

 Could improve students’ learning

3. Introduction (unit 15%  Wrote the rational of his\her research (why he\she choose
one) the issue)

 States the problem clearly (mentioned indicators of the


problem)

 Set clear and precise objectives

 Designed answerable, feasible and relevant research


questions

 Works of other scholars/researchers is reviewed

4. Preliminary 10%  The existing practice and its context is clearly addressed
Investigation
 The magnitude of the impact of the problem is indicated
supported by preliminary evidences

 The possible actions to be taken to improve the practice


are hypothesized

5. Review section 5%  Review is supported by credible sources

 The review is related with the research questions

 Follows appropriate quotation, paragraphing & citation

1
6. Methodology 15%  Has appropriate research design (case study or descriptive)

 Described the research approach

 Identify the participants and the sampling techniques with


sound rational

 The data sources and instruments are relevant to the


problem treated

 Narrated the procedures of the data collection

 Data analysis technique matches to the research objective


and the nature of the data being used

7. Data analysis and 5%  Data is analysed through the techniques specified in the
interpretation method section

 The analysis is clear and targeted to the research questions

 Tables and graphs (if any)are properly named

 Data is analysed coherently and minor conclusions are


made

 Summary of the findings are jotted down

8. Action Strategy 10%  The strategies are acceptable, feasible & relevant

 Co-workers are mentioned in the plan of action strategy

 Strategies are related with the research questions

9. Implementations 10%  Strategies are implemented in different cycles

 It shows the how, why, when, for how long, by whom & by
using what materials each strategy was implemented

 The implementation sounds authentic/It seems really


implemented

10. Evaluation section 10%  The change expected is clearly indicated

 The sources of data for evaluation is described

 The tools for post-intervention data collection (evaluation)

2
are specified and are also meaningful

 The stakeholders who authenticate the


improvement/evaluators are mentioned

 What is learnt from the research process is well described

 Aspects of the problem are identified for future research


and action

11. Extras 1%  References which are used in the body section are
appropriately acknowledged

12. Appendix 1%  Data collecting instruments & other supporting documents


are appended at the end

13. Other criteria 10%  The work is original and not copied from any where

 The student teacher included all the comments given at


proposal stage

 The report seems true and really conducted

 Clarity, coherency and eligibility of the language usage

You might also like