Engineering Optimization Methods and Applications 2nd Edition A. Ravindran pdf download
Engineering Optimization Methods and Applications 2nd Edition A. Ravindran pdf download
https://ebookgate.com/product/engineering-optimization-methods-
and-applications-2nd-edition-a-ravindran/
https://ebookgate.com/product/engineering-optimization-an-
introduction-with-metaheuristic-applications-1st-edition-xin-she-yang/
ebookgate.com
Applications of Combinatorial Optimization 2nd ed Edition
Vangelis Th. Paschos
https://ebookgate.com/product/applications-of-combinatorial-
optimization-2nd-ed-edition-vangelis-th-paschos/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/principles-of-engineering-economics-
with-applications-2nd-edition-zahid-a-khan/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/mathematical-methods-for-physics-and-
engineering-a-comprehensive-guide-2nd-edition-k-f-riley/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/numerical-methods-and-optimization-in-
finance-1st-edition-manfred-gilli/
ebookgate.com
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION
Engineering Optimization: Methods and Applications, Second Edition. A. Ravindran, K. M. Ragsdell and
G. V. Reklaitis © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-0-471-55814-9
ENGINEERING
OPTIMIZATION
Methods and Applications
SECOND EDITION
A. Ravindran
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Pennsylvania State University
K. M. Ragsdell
Engineering Management and Systems Engineering
University of Missouri–Rolla
G. V. Reklaitis
Chemical Engineering
Purdue University
Limit of Liability / Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and the author have used their
best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to
the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied
warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or
extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained
herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where
appropriate. Neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any
other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or
other damages.
For general information about our other products and services, please contact our Customer
Care Department within the United States at (800) 762-2974, outside the United States at
(317) 572-3993 or fax (317) 572-4002.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in
print may not be available in electronic books. For more information about Wiley products,
visit our web site at www.wiley.com.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
CONTENTS
Preface xiii
1 Introduction to Optimization 1
1.1 Requirements for the Application of Optimization
Methods / 2
1.1.1 Defining the System Boundaries / 2
1.1.2 Performance Criterion / 3
1.1.3 Independent Variables / 4
1.1.4 System Model / 5
1.2 Applications of Optimization in Engineering / 6
1.2.1 Design Applications / 8
1.2.2 Operations and Planning Applications / 15
1.2.3 Analysis and Data Reduction Applications / 20
1.2.4 Classical Mechanics Applications / 26
1.2.5 Taguchi System of Quality Engineering / 27
1.3 Structure of Optimization Problems / 28
1.4 Scope of This Book / 29
References / 30
v
vi CONTENTS
References / 518
Problems / 521
We are deeply gratified by the enthusiastic response given to the first edition
of our book by our colleagues and students. We took great care in preparing
the second edition. We added some new material, revised the explanation and
presentation of some topics, and increased the number of problems.
Examples of new material include more application of optimization prob-
lems in Chapter 1, discussion of duality theory and interior point methods for
solving LP problems in Chapter 4, new sections on the generalized Lagrange
multiplier method and generalization of convex functions in Chapter 5, a new
section on goal programming for solving multiobjective optimization prob-
lems in Chapter 11, and the inclusion of software availability for solving
nonlinear programs in Chapter 12.
To make room for the new material and to keep the size of the book down,
we deleted discussion of cutting plane methods in Chapter 8, gradient pro-
jection methods, in Chapter 9 and geometric programming in Chapter 11.
This is a text on the practical aspects of optimization methodology, with a
major focus on the techniques and stratagems relevant to engineering appli-
cation arising in design, operations, and analysis. Attention is given primarily
to techniques applicable to problems in continuous variables that involve real-
valued constraint functions and a single real-valued objective function. In
short, we treat the methodology often categorized as nonlinear programming.
Within this framework a broad survey is given of all-important families of
optimization methods, ranging from those applicable to the minimization of
a single-variable function to those most suitable for large-scale nonlinear con-
strained problems. Included are discussions not only of classical methods,
important for historical reasons and for their role in motivating subsequent
developments in this field, but also of promising new techniques, such as
those of successive quadratic programming and goal programming.
Our development is aimed at imparting an understanding of the logic of
the methods, of the key assumptions that underlie them, and of the compar-
ative merits of the methods. Proofs and mathematical derivations are given
only if they serve to explain key steps or properties of algorithms. Generally,
we simply cite the original literature source for proofs and use the pages of
this book to motivate and explain the key steps underlying the mathematical
constructions. Thus, our aim is to inform the engineer-user of optimization
methodology rather than to prepare the software specialist who will develop
computer implementations of the algorithms. In keeping with this aim, we
xiii
xiv PREFACE
leagues and mentors in our respective engineering disciplines, who are too
numerous to acknowledge individually. We are indebted for the numerous
questions and pleas for clarification raised by our students in engineering
optimization, who have persevered through various revisions of the manu-
script. Their persistent, often biting, and usually justifiable criticism, overt
and sub rosa, has been a key driving force in the revision process. We wish
to thank our Wiley editor, Robert Argentieri, for his perseverance and pa-
tience. We express our sincere appreciation to Ajay Natarajan, an industrial
engineering doctoral student at Penn State University, for his careful prepa-
ration of the author and subject indexes for the second edition. Finally we
are grateful to the instructors who have adopted our first edition and for their
encouragement and helpful suggestions that made the second edition a reality.
Engineering Optimization: Methods and Applications, Second Edition. A. Ravindran, K. M. Ragsdell and 1
G. V. Reklaitis © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-0-471-55814-9
2 INTRODUCTION TO OPTIMIZATION
1. The shop foreman may seek a design that will involve long production
runs with a minimum of color and part changes. This will maximize
the number of parts painted per unit time.
2. The sales department would prefer a design that maximizes the inven-
tory of parts of every type and color. This will minimize the time be-
tween customer order and order dispatch.
4 INTRODUCTION TO OPTIMIZATION
3. The company financial officer would prefer a design that will minimize
inventories so as to reduce the amount of capital tied up in parts inven-
tory.
These are clearly conflicting performance criteria that cannot all be optimized
simultaneously. A suitable compromise would be to select as the primary
performance index the minimum annual cost but then to require as secondary
conditions that the inventory of each part not be allowed to fall below or rise
above agreed-upon limits and that production runs involve no more than some
maximum acceptable number of part and color changes per week.
In summary, for purposes of applying the methods discussed in this text,
it is necessary to formulate the optimization problem with a single perform-
ance criterion. Advanced techniques do exist for treating certain types of
multicriteria optimization problems. However, this new and growing body of
techniques is quite beyond the scope of this book. The interested reader is
directed to recent specialized texts [1, 2].
pressure, we may well obtain a very poor design. For the selected fixed pres-
sure, we would certainly find the least-cost tank dimensions. However, by
including the storage pressure as an independent variable and adding the
compressor cost to our performance criteria, we could obtain a design with a
lower overall cost because of a reduction in the required tank volume. Thus,
the independent variables must be selected so that all important alternatives
are included in the formulation. In general, the exclusion of possible alter-
natives will lead to suboptimal solutions.
Finally, another consideration in the selection of variables is the level of
detail to which the system is considered. While it is important to treat all key
independent variables, it is equally important not to obscure the problem by
the inclusion of a large number of fine details of subordinate importance. For
instance, in the preliminary design of a process involving a number of dif-
ferent pieces of equipment—pressure vessels, towers, pumps, compressors,
and heat exchanges—one would normally not explicitly consider all the fine
details of the design of each individual unit. A heat exchanger may well be
characterized by a heat transfer surface area as well as shell-side and tube-
side pressure drops. Detailed design variables such as number and size of
tubes, number of tube and shell passes, baffle spacing, header type, and shell
dimensions would normally be considered in a separate design study involv-
ing that unit by itself. In selecting the independent variables, a good rule is
to include only those variables that have a significant impact on the composite
system performance criterion.
tions that describe the physical phenomena taking place in the system. These
equations will normally be supplemented by inequalities that define allowable
operating ranges, specify minimum or maximum performance requirements,
or set bounds on resource availabilities. In sum, the model consists of all
elements that normally must be considered in calculating a design or in pre-
dicting the performance of an engineering system. Quite clearly, the assembly
of a model is a very time consuming activity and one that requires a thorough
understanding of the system being considered. In later chapters we will have
occasion to discuss the mechanics of model development in more detail. For
now, we simply observe that a model is a collection of equations and in-
equalities that define how the system variables are related and that constrain
the variables to take on acceptable values.
From the preceding discussion, we observe that a problem suitable for the
application of optimization methodology consists of a performance measure,
a set of independent variables, and a model relating the variables. Given these
rather general and abstract requirements, it is evident that the methods of
optimization can be applied to a very wide variety of applications. In fact,
the methods we will discuss have been applied to problems that include the
optimum design of process and structures, the planning of investment policies,
the layout of warehouse networks, the determination of optimal trucking
routes, the planning of heath care systems, the deployment of military forces,
and the design of mechanical components, to name but a few. In this text our
focus will be on engineering applications. Some of these applications and
their formulations are discussed in the next section.
Description. The basic oxygen furnace (BOF) used in the production of steel
is a large fed-batch chemical reactor that employs pure oxygen. The furnace
is operated in a cyclical fashion. Ore and flux are charged to the unit, treated
for a specified time period, and then discharged. This cyclical operation gives
rise to a cyclically varying demand rate for oxygen. As shown in Figure 1.2,
over each cycle there is a time interval of length t1 of low demand rate D0
and a time interval t2 ⫺ t1 of high demand rate D1. The oxygen used in the
BOF is produced in an oxygen plant in a standard process in which oxygen
is separated from air by using a combination of refrigeration and distillation.
Oxygen plants are highly automated and are designed to deliver oxygen at a
fixed rate. To mesh the continuous oxygen plant with the cyclically operating
BOF, a simple inventory system (Figure 1.3) consisting of a compressor and
a storage tank must be designed. A number of design possibilities can be
considered. In the simplest case, the oxygen plant capacity could be selected
to be equal to D1, the high demand rate. During the low-demand interval the
excess oxygen could just be vented to the air. At the other extreme, the oxygen
plant capacity could be chosen to be just enough to produce the amount of
oxygen required by the BOF over a cycle. During the low-demand interval,
the excess oxygen produced would then be compressed and stored for use
during the high-demand interval of the cycle. Intermediate designs could use
some combination of venting and storage of oxygen. The problem is to select
the optimal design.
Formulation. The system of concern will consist of the O2 plant, the com-
pressor, and the storage tank. The BOF and its demand cycle are assumed
fixed by external factors. A reasonable performance index for the design is
the total annual cost, which consists of the oxygen production cost (fixed and
variable), the compressor operating cost, and the fixed costs of the compressor
and storage vessel. The key independent variables are the oxygen plant pro-
duction rate F (lb O2 /hr), the compressor and storage tank design capacities,
H (HP) and V (ft3), respectively, and the maximum tank pressure p (psia).
Presumably the oxygen plant design is standard so that the production rate
fully characterizes the plant. Similarly, we assume that the storage tank will
be of a standard design approved for O2 service.
The model will consist of the basic design equations that relate the key
independent variables.
If Imax is the maximum amount of oxygen that must be stored, then using
the corrected gas law we have
Imax RT
V⫽ z (1.1)
M p
10 INTRODUCTION TO OPTIMIZATION
From Figure 1.2, the maximum amount of oxygen that must be stored is
equal to the area under the demand curve between t1 and t2 and D1 and F.
Thus,
H⫽
(D1 ⫺ F)(t2 ⫺ t1) RT
t1 k1k2
ln
p
冉冊
p0
(1.4)
Moreover, the maximum tank pressure must be greater than the O2 delivery
pressure,
p ⭓ p0 (1.6)
The performance criterion will consist of the oxygen plant annual cost,
where a1 and a2 are empirical constants for plants of this general type and
include fuel, water, and labor costs.
The capital cost of storage vessels is given by a power law correlation,
1.2 APPLICATIONS OF OPTIMIZATION IN ENGINEERING 11
where N is the number of cycles per year and d is an appropriate annual cost
factor.
The complete design optimization problem thus consists of the problem of
minimizing (1.9) by the appropriate choice of F, V, H, and p subject to Eqs.
(1.3) and (1.4) as well as inequalities (1.5) and (1.6).
The solution of this problem will clearly be affected by the choice of the
cycle parameters (N, D0, D1, t1, and t2), the cost parameters (a1, a2, b1 –b5,
and d), and the physical parameters (T, p0, k2, z, and M).
In principle we could solve this problem by eliminating V and H from (1.9)
using (1.3) and (1.4), thus obtaining a two-variable problem. We could then
plot the contours of the cost function (1.9) in the plane of the two variables
F and p, impose the inequalities (1.5) and (1.6), and determine the minimum
point from the plot. However, the methods discussed in subsequent chapters
allow us to obtain the solution with much less work. For further details and
a study of solutions for various parameter values, the reader is invited to
consult Jen et al. [4].
F(x) ⫽ c0 ⫹ c1 ⫹ c2 (1.10)
Setup Cost c0. The company has chosen to make this component a weld-
ment, because of the existence of a welding assembly line. Furthermore, as-
sume that fixtures for setup and holding of the bar during welding are readily
available. The cost c0 can therefore be ignored in this particular total-cost
model.
Welding Labor Cost c1. Assume that the welding will be done by machine
at a total cost of $10/hr (including operating and maintenance expense). Fur-
thermore, suppose that the machine can lay down a cubic inch of weld in 6
min. The labor cost is then
c1 ⫽ 10冉 冊冉
$
hr
1 hr
60 min 冊冉 冊6
min
V ⫽1
in.3 w
$
冉 冊V
in.3 w
Material Cost c2
c2 ⫽ c3Vw ⫹ c4VB
1.2 APPLICATIONS OF OPTIMIZATION IN ENGINEERING 13
and
VB ⫽ tb(L ⫹ l)
so
c2 ⫽ c3h2l ⫹ c4tb(L ⫹ l)
Not all combinations of x1, x2, x3, and x4 can be allowed if the structure is
to support the load required. Several functional relationships between the
design variables that delimit the region of feasibility must certainly be defined.
These relationships, expressed in the form of inequalities, represent the design
model. Let us first define the inequalities and then discuss their interpretation.
The inequalities are
Weld Stress (x). After Shigley [5], the weld shear stress has two com-
ponents, ⬘ and ⴖ, where ⬘ is the primary stress acting over the weld throat
area and ⴖ is a secondary torsional stress:
F MR
⬘ ⫽ and ⴖ ⫽
兹2x1x2 J
with
M⫽F L⫹ 冉 冊 x2
2
R⫽ 冋 冉 冊册
x22
4
x ⫹ x1
⫹ 3
2
2 1/2
再 冋 冉
J ⫽ 2 0.707x1x2
x22
12
x ⫹ x1
⫹ 3
2 冊 册冎
2
where
x2
cos ⫽
2R
Bar Bending Stress (x). The maximum bending stress can be shown to
be equal to
6FL
(x) ⫽
x4 x32
1.2 APPLICATIONS OF OPTIMIZATION IN ENGINEERING 15
Bar Buckling Load Pc(x). If the ratio t/b ⫽ x3 /x4 grows large, there is a
tendency for the bar to buckle. Those combinations of x3 and x4 that will
cause this buckling to occur must be disallowed. It has been shown [6] that
for narrow rectangular bars a good approximation to the buckling load is
Pc(x) ⫽
4.013兹EI␣
L2
x
1⫺ 3
2L冉 冪␣冊
EI
4FL3
␦(x) ⫽
Ex33 x4
For a further discussion of this problem and its solution, see reference 7.
adapted to operate under different conditions. The reasons for doing this might
be as follows:
The solution to such problems might require the selection of new temperature,
pressure, or flow conditions; the addition of further equipment; or the defi-
nition of new operating procedures. Production planning applications arise
from the need to schedule the joint production of several products in a given
plant or to coordinate the production plans of a network of production facil-
ities. Since in such applications the capital equipment is already in place, only
the variable costs need to be considered. Thus, this type of application can
often be formulated in terms of linear or nearly linear models. We will illus-
trate this class of applications using a refinery planning problem.
regular-grade gasoline, another that represents the amount used to make pre-
mium, and a third that represents the amount sold directly.
Thus, for each intermediate i,
Each product will have two variables associated with it: one to represent the
contracted sales and one to represent the open-market sales.
Thus, for each product j,
The model will consist of material balances on each intermediate and product,
blending constraints that ensure that product performance ratings are met, and
bounds on the contract sales:
18 INTRODUCTION TO OPTIMIZATION
xi ⫹ yi ⫹ zi ⭐ ␣i (1.21)
冘x ⫽u ⫹v
i
i 1 1 冘y ⫽u ⫹v
i
i 2 2 (1.22)
冘  x ⭓ ␥ (u ⫹ v ) 冘  y ⭓ ␥ (u ⫹ v )
i
i i 1 1 1
i
i i 2 2 2 (1.23)
uj ⭓ ␦j (1.24)
冘c j u ⫹
(1)
j 冘c j v ⫹
(2)
j 冘c z ⫺
(3)
i i 冘c
i
(xi ⫹ yi ⫹ zi) ⫺
(4)
i 冘c
i
(5)
i (xi ⫹ yi)
where c(1)
i ⫽ unit selling price for contract sales of j
c(2)
j ⫽ unit selling price for open-market sales of j
c(3)
i ⫽ unit selling price of direct sales of intermediate i
c(4)
i ⫽ unit charged cost of intermediate i
c(5)
i ⫽ blending cost of intermediate i
Using the data given in Table 1.1, the planning problem reduces to
Subject to
Constraints of type (1.21):
1.2 APPLICATIONS OF OPTIMIZATION IN ENGINEERING 19
x1 ⫹ y1 ⫹ z1 ⭐ 2 ⫻ 105
x2 ⫹ y2 ⫹ z2 ⭐ 4 ⫻ 105
x3 ⫹ y3 ⫹ z3 ⭐ 4 ⫻ 105
x4 ⫹ y4 ⫹ z4 ⭐ 5 ⫻ 105
x5 ⫹ y5 ⫹ z5 ⭐ 5 ⫻ 105
x1 ⫹ x2 ⫹ x3 ⫹ x4 ⫹ x5 ⫽ u1 ⫹ v1
y1 ⫹ y2 ⫹ y3 ⫹ y4 ⫹ y5 ⫽ u2 ⫹ v2
u1 ⭓ 5 ⫻ 105 u2 ⭓ 4 ⫻ 105
ables and 11 constraints plus the nonnegativity conditions. Note that all model
functions are linear in the independent variables.
The resulting production planning model can then become very large. In prac-
tice, models of this type with over a thousand variables are solved quite
routinely.
冘 [y ⫺ ƒ(x , , )]
N
L(i, 2) ⫽ i i 1 2
2
(1.25)
i⫽1
The difference yi ⫺ ƒ(xi, 1, 2) between the experimental value yi and the
predicted value ƒ(xi, 1, 2) measures how close our model prediction is to
the data and is called the residual. The sum of the squares of the residuals at
all the experimental points gives an indication of goodness of fit. Clearly, if
L(1, 2) is equal to zero, then the choice of 1, 2 has led to a perfect fit; the
1.2 APPLICATIONS OF OPTIMIZATION IN ENGINEERING 21
data points fall exactly on the predicted curve. The data-fitting problem can
thus be viewed as an optimization problem in which L(1, 2) is minimized
by appropriate choice of 1 and 2.
Pv ⫽ RT
RT a
P⫽ ⫺ (1.26)
v⫺b T 1 / 2v(v ⫹ b)
is intended to correct for the departure from ideality, but it involves two
empirical constants a and b whose values are best determined from experi-
mental data. A series of PvT measurements, listed in Table 1.2, are made for
CO2, from which a and b are to be estimated using nonlinear regression.
冘 冋P ⫺ v RT⫺ b ⫹ T 册
8 2
i a
(1.27)
i vi (vi ⫹ b)
i 1/2
i⫽1 i
Experiment
Number P, atm v, cm3 / g 䡠 mol T, K
1 33 500 273
2 43 500 323
3 45 600 373
4 26 700 273
5 37 600 323
6 39 700 373
7 38 400 273
8 63.6 400 373
22 INTRODUCTION TO OPTIMIZATION
冉 33 ⫺
82.06(273)
500 ⫺ b
⫹
a
(273) (500)(500 ⫹ b)
1/2 冊 2
machining time and hence the machining cost, but it has an adverse effect on
the life of the cutting tool and results in a higher tooling cost. In addition,
the optimal values of v and ƒ will also depend on labor and overhead costs
of nonproductive time and tool-changing time. Hence, minimization of the
total cost per component is the criterion most often used in selecting the
optimal machining parameters, feed and speed.
The cost per component c for a part produced in one pass is given by
Armarego and Brown [11]:
Material costs are not considered. The third and fourth terms may be stated
more specifically as
and
l
Tc ⫽ (min) (1.29)
vƒ
24 INTRODUCTION TO OPTIMIZATION
It has been found [11] that tool life, cutting speed, and feed are related as
follows:
A
T⫽ (min) (1.30)
v1 / nƒ1 / n1
c ⫽ xTL ⫹
xl
vƒ 冉
⫹ xTd
l
⫹
A A
v ƒ冊
yl (1 / n)⫺1 (1 / n1)⫺1
(dollars) (1.31)
vmin ⭐ v ⭐ vmax
ƒmin ⭐ ƒ ⭐ ƒmax
Ft ⫽ cf ƒ␣dc␥ (1.32)
where ct, ␣, and ␥ are constants and dc is the depth of cut, which is
held constant at a given value. This constraint on the cutting force
results in the following feed constraint:
ƒ⭐ 冋 册
Ft,max
ct d␥c
1/␣
Ft v
HP ⫽
33,000
Pmax(33,000)
vƒ␣ ⭐
ct d␥c
For a given Pmax, ct, ␥, and dc, the right-hand side of the above in-
equality will be a constant.
(v) Stable Cutting Region. Certain combinations of v and ƒ values are
likely to cause chatter vibration, adhesion, and built-up edge forma-
tion. To avoid this problem, the following stable cutting region con-
straint is used:
v␦ƒ ⭓ 
When the fixed values are inserted into Eq. (1.28), the cost function becomes
26 INTRODUCTION TO OPTIMIZATION
982.0
Minimize c ⫽ 0.30 ⫹ ⫹ 8.1 ⫻ 10⫺9v2.333ƒ1.222
vƒ
v ⭐ 982.0
v ⭓ 49.1
ƒ ⭐ 35.0 (cutting force)
ƒ ⭓ 1.0
vƒ 0.78 ⭐ 4000.0 (horsepower)
v ƒ ⭓ 380,000.0
2.0
(stable cutting region)
v, ƒ ⭓ 0
D (x)
0 Pc
Pc X
column was a right circular cylinder. Lagrange suspected and many later
proved that this could not be so. Carter and Ragsdell later showed that a
direct optimization approach employing Fourier approximating functions
would produce a valid solution to the optimal column problem of Lagrange
and to many related minimum-weight structural design problems. The reader
is referred to the references for additional details.
Minimize ƒ(x)
Subject to hk(x) ⫽ 0 k ⫽ 1, . . . , K
gj (x) ⭓ 0 j ⫽ 1, . . . , J
x (U)
i ⭓ xi ⭓ x (L)
i i ⫽ 1, . . . , N
J⫽K⫽0
and
x (U)
i ⫽ ⫺x (L)
i ⫽⬁ i ⫽ 1, . . . , N
REFERENCES
1. Zeleny, M., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982.
2. Vincent, T. L., and W. J. Grantham, Optimality in Parametric Systems, Wiley, New
York, 1981.
3. Bett, K. E., J. S. Rowlinson, and G. Saville, Thermodynamics for Chemical En-
gineers, MIT Pres, Cambridge, MA, 1975.
4. Jen, F. C., C. C. Pegels, and T. M. Dupuis, ‘‘Optimal Capacities of Production
Facilities,’’ Manag. Sci. 14B, 570–580 (1968).
Other documents randomly have
different content
VIII.
Egy este, Oláh Gábor távozása után, Illésfalvy még egy percre az
ebédlőbe hítta Teklát.
– Nos – kérdezte az ablakhoz állva és az erdész kocsija után
nézve, – meg van velem elégedve?
A leány nem felelt, csak csöndesen mosolygott.
– Nyilatkozott-e már Gábor? – tudakolta tovább a férfi.
– Még nem.
– De… megértik egymást?
– Igen… Én legalább azt hiszem.
Dénes ránézett barátnőjére, aki nyugodtan viszonozta a
pillantást.
– Beszéljek talán én Oláhhal? – vetette föl ujra a szót Illésfalvy. –
Az ilyen hallgatag emberek rendszerint egy kis buzdítást várnak. A
mi barátunk nagyon is szerény és tartózkodó… Ha nincs ellene
kifogása, majd holnap vadászatnál úgy terelem beszélgetésünket,
hogy a jövőre vonatkozó tervei kerüljenek szőnyegre. Talán Oláh
bizalmára fog méltatni… Jó lesz?
Tekla bólintott.
– Csak a szülei ne ellenezzék – mondta félénken.
– Azt majd elintézem. A jövő hét folyamán meg fogom látogatni
az öreg kapitányt és megmagyarázom neki, hogy ne állja útját fia
boldogságának. Azután – esetleg a kapisztráni gróffal is
értekezhetem a javadalmazás emelése dolgában, bár az öreg úr nem
a legkedvesebb emberem.
A leány ránézett Dénesre.
– Milyen jó hozzám – mondta hálás tekintettel.
Csönd volt.
– Remélem, nem fog egészen megfeledkezni Sámsonról – szólt a
férfi mosolyogva. – Könnyen megy el innét?
– Oh, hogy is gondolhatja – válaszolta a leány melegen, de
nyugodtan, – hiszen annyi jó órát töltöttem e házban. Sámsont sose
fogom elfeledni. Meg kell igérnie, hogy minden héten legalább
egyszer meglátogat bennünket, s mi is minden héten fel fogjuk
keresni, föltéve, hogy ez nincs ellenére.
– Remélem, hogy mindig úgy fogja itt magát a jövőben is érezni,
mintha otthon lenne – szólt Illésfalvy, és elgondolkozott rajta, hogy,
íme, a lány, aki pár hét előtt még megtörve, vigasztalanul állt előtte,
már egészen leszámolt a multtal, sőt: előre beleéli magát a
házaséletbe.
Tekla egy ideig hallgatott, majd kezét nyujtotta Dénesnek.
– Nagyon köszönöm azt a sok jóságot – szólt közvetlenül, –
amelyet irántam mindig tanusított. Őrizzen meg jó emlékében!
Az idő későre járt. Illésfalvy – talán életében először – kezet
csókolt barátnőjének s aztán szobájába vonult.
ebookgate.com