9066 Syntax Book
9066 Syntax Book
Book
Interrogative to Assertive:
Was he a good teacher? → He was a good teacher.
Affirmative to Negative:
He was a good teacher. → He was not a good teacher.
Exclamatory to Assertive:
What a happy moment this is! → This is a happy moment.
Chapter 3: Words
Introduction
This chapter explores the fundamental role of words in syntax, describing them as the
building blocks of sentences. It categorizes words into lexical (content) and functional (structure)
categories, explaining their syntactic and morphological characteristics. The chapter aims to help
students understand how words function in sentence formation and how they are classified in
syntax.
Key Topics Covered
1. Word as a Syntactic Unit
Syntax studies the rules that help generate an infinite number of grammatical sentences.
Words combine to form phrases, which then form clauses and sentences.
Words are not all the same—they serve different functions and are divided into two broad
categories:
1. Lexical Categories (content words)
2. Functional Categories (structure words)
2. Lexical Categories
These are content words that carry meaning in a sentence. There are four main types:
1. Nouns
o Refer to people, places, things, or ideas (e.g., car, teacher, honesty).
o Can function as subjects or objects in a sentence.
o Can be singular or plural (boy → boys).
o Can be modified by adjectives (beautiful house).
2. Pronouns
o Replace nouns (he, she, it, they).
o Types: Personal, Possessive, Reflexive, Demonstrative, etc.
3. Verbs
o Express actions or states of being (run, think, exist).
o Can be transitive (needs an object) or intransitive (no object needed).
4. Adjectives
o Describe nouns (happy, large, intelligent).
o Can show degree of comparison (tall → taller → tallest).
5. Adverbs
o Modify verbs, adjectives, or other adverbs (quickly, very, too).
o Indicate manner, place, time, frequency (She speaks softly. He left yesterday.).
3. Functional Categories
These words do not carry meaning alone but provide grammatical structure in a sentence.
Determiners
o Articles (a, an, the), demonstratives (this, that), possessives (my, your).
Auxiliaries (Helping Verbs)
o Primary auxiliaries (be, have, do).
o Modal auxiliaries (can, must, shall).
Conjunctions
o Coordinating: (and, but, or).
o Subordinating: (because, although, if).
Complementizers
o Introduce subordinate clauses (that, whether, if).
Prepositions
o Indicate relationships between words (in, on, at, under).
Particles
o Used in phrasal verbs (put on, take off, break down).
4. Differences between Lexical and Functional Categories
Can change form (e.g., pluralization, verb Do not change form (e.g., and, the, if remain
conjugation). the same).
Open class – new words can be added. Closed class – few new words can be added.
Chapter 4: Phrases
Introduction
This chapter introduces the concept of phrases as meaningful groups of words and explains
how they differ from ungrammatical word strings. It discusses phrase structure rules (PS rules),
developed under Noam Chomsky’s generative grammar theory, to illustrate how phrases are
formed systematically. The chapter also introduces different types of phrases (NP, VP, AP, AdvP,
PP, CP), their hierarchical structure, recursion, coordination, particle movement, and
structural ambiguity.
Key Topics Covered
1. What is a Phrase?
A phrase is a group of words that function as a single unit in a sentence.
Example of a phrase: a big house (grammatical).
Example of an ungrammatical word string: big in for (incorrect).
Phrases are rule-governed; native speakers learn these rules as part of their mental
grammar.
2. Noam Chomsky’s Generative Grammar and Phrase Structure Rules (PS Rules)
Chomsky introduced generative grammar, which suggests that speakers have a finite set
of rules to generate infinite grammatical phrases and sentences.
These rules are called Phrase Structure Rules (PS Rules).
PS rules specify what constituents belong to a phrase and in what order.
3. Types of Phrases and Their Structure
3.1 Noun Phrase (NP)
Contains a noun (N) as the head and may include determiners (Det), adjectives (A),
prepositional phrases (PP), or sentences (S).
Example:
o The tall boy from Lahore (NP) → Det + A + N + PP.
PS Rule:
o NP → (Det) (A) N (PP/S).
3.2 Verb Phrase (VP)
Contains a verb (V) as the head and may include objects, adverbs, prepositional
phrases, or sentences.
Examples:
o The boy ran. (VP: ran)
o The boy writes a letter hurriedly. (VP: writes a letter hurriedly)
PS Rule:
o VP → V (NP) (PP/S/AdvP).
3.3 Adjective Phrase (AP)
Contains an adjective (A) as the head and may include a prepositional phrase or a
sentence.
Example:
o The boy is proud of his achievement. (AP: proud of his achievement)
PS Rule:
o AP → A (PP/S).
3.4 Adverb Phrase (AdvP)
Contains an adverb (Adv) as the head and may include other adverbs.
Example:
o Very happily (AdvP: very happily).
PS Rule:
o AdvP → (AdvP) Adv.
3.5 Prepositional Phrase (PP)
Contains a preposition (P) as the head, followed by a noun phrase (NP).
Example:
o On the table (PP: on the table).
PS Rule:
o PP → P NP.
3.6 Complementizer Phrase (CP)
A phrase with a complementizer (C) as the head, introducing a subordinate clause (S).
Example:
o Ahmed wondered if his boss liked his work. (CP: if his boss liked his work).
PS Rule:
o CP → C S.
4. Sentence Structure and Hierarchical Representation
A sentence (S) consists of an NP (subject) followed by a VP (predicate).
PS Rule for Sentences:
o S → NP VP.
Sentences have a hierarchical structure, meaning phrases nest within each other.
5. Recursion in Syntax
Recursion allows sentences to be infinitely expandable by embedding phrases within
phrases.
Example:
o I know [that you believe [that he said [that they will come.]]] (CP within CP within
CP).
Recursion makes language flexible and expressive.
6. Coordination and Particle Movement
6.1 Coordination
Two like phrases (NPs, VPs, APs) can be joined by coordinating conjunctions (and, but,
or).
Example:
o Ali and his friend (NP + NP).
PS Rule:
o XP → XP Conj XP.
6.2 Particle Movement
Particles in phrasal verbs (turn on, put off, take away) can move within the sentence.
Example:
o He turned on the light. (V + Part + NP)
o He turned the light on. (V + NP + Part)
PS Rules:
o VP → V Part NP
o VP → V NP Part.
7. Ambiguity in Phrase Structure
Lexical Ambiguity: A word has multiple meanings (bank = riverbank vs. financial bank).
Structural Ambiguity: A phrase has multiple interpretations.
Example:
o Little boys and girls
(Little boys) and (girls) → Two groups
Little (boys and girls) → Both are little
Tree diagrams help disambiguate sentences.
Chapter 8: Transformations
Introduction
This chapter introduces Transformational Generative Grammar (TGG), a theory proposed
by Noam Chomsky. It explains how transformational rules modify phrase structure rules (PS rules)
to generate complex sentence structures. The chapter discusses deep structure vs. surface structure,
the limitations of PS rules, and key transformational rules used to form different sentence types,
such as interrogative sentences, passive sentences, fronted constituents, imperative sentences, and
compound/complex sentences.
1. Phrase Structure Rules (PS Rules) and Their Limitations
PS rules generate simple, active, and declarative sentences. However, PS rules cannot explain
complex transformations like questions, passives, orembedded clauses.
Example of PS Rules:
o S → NP VP (A sentence consists of a noun phrase and a verb phrase).
o NP → (Det) (A) N (PP/S) (A noun phrase may include determiners, adjectives, a
noun, and a prepositional phrase or sentence).
o VP → V (NP) (PP/S/AdvP) (A verb phrase consists of a verb, possibly followed
by an object, prepositional phrase, subordinate clause, or adverb phrase).
These rules create basic sentence structures (deep structures), but cannot handle sentence
transformations.
2. Deep Structure vs. Surface Structure
Deep Structure (D-Structure): The underlying grammatical structure of a sentence before
transformations are applied.
Surface Structure (S-Structure): The final form of a sentence after transformations.
Example:
o Deep Structure: You will wash your hands.
o Surface Structure (Imperative Transformation): Wash your hands!
Transformations modify deep structures to generate different sentence types.
3. Key Transformational Rules
3.1 Interrogative Sentences (Questions)
Formed by moving auxiliary verbs or wh-words to the front of a sentence.
Transformational Rules:
1. Subject-Auxiliary Inversion: Moves an auxiliary verb before the subject.
He is sleeping. → Is he sleeping?
2. Do-Support: Adds “do” if there is no auxiliary verb.
She likes coffee. → Does she like coffee?
3. Wh-Movement: Moves a wh-word (who, what, where, etc.) to the front.
You locked the door. → Who locked the door?.
3.2 Passive Sentences
Formed by rearranging subject and object positions and adding “be” + past participle.
Transformational Rules:
1. Move the object of an active sentence to the subject position.
2. Move the subject to a by-phrase (optional).
3. Change the verb to a passive form (be + past participle).
Example:
o Ali wrote a book. → A book was written by Ali..
3.3 Sentences with Fronted Constituents
Moves elements (adverbs, prepositional phrases) to the beginning for emphasis.
Example:
o He rushed into the office. → Into the office, he rushed.
o Never before have I seen such a thing. (subject-auxiliary inversion triggered).
3.4 Imperative Sentences
Formed by deleting the subject (you) and auxiliary (will/shall).
Example:
o You will leave now. → Leave now!
o You must be quiet. → Be quiet!.
3.5 Compound and Complex Sentences
Compound Sentences: Formed by combining two independent clauses using a
coordinating conjunction (and, but, or).
o The sun shone brightly and the birds chirped.
Complex Sentences: Formed by embedding one clause inside another (using
complementizers like that, which).
o The novel that I borrowed is a classic.
These transformations involve deletion of repeated elements and insertion of
complementizers.
4. Summary Points
Transformational Generative Grammar (TGG) explains how sentence structures
change.
Deep Structure → Transformational Rules → Surface Structure.
Common transformations:
o Interrogatives (questions)
o Passives (object-subject switch)
o Fronted Constituents (adverb/preposition movement)
o Imperatives (subject deletion)
o Compound & Complex Sentences (coordination and subordination)
These rules expand simple sentence structures into complex expressions.
Chapter 9: Further Developments in Generative Grammar
Introduction
This chapter explores the evolution of Generative Grammar, tracing its development from
Standard Theory (1965) to the Minimalist Program (1993). It highlights how linguistic theories
have refined syntactic analysis over time while maintaining the core principle that language is
governed by innate rules.
1. Generative Grammar
Proposed by Noam Chomsky, Generative Grammar is a cognitive approach that views
grammar as a set of mental rules hardwired into the human brain.
The theory rejects behaviorist views, arguing that language is not merely learned but
follows innate principles.
It emphasizes deep structure vs. surface structure and the role of transformations in
sentence generation.
2. The Standard Theory (1965)
Outlined in Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, this model introduced Deep Structure and
Surface Structure.
Deep Structure: Underlying grammatical relationships.
Surface Structure: The final form after applying transformational rules.
Example:
o Deep Structure: John saw Mary → Surface Structure: Mary was seen by John
(passive transformation).
Key Idea: Grammatical meaning is encoded at the deep structure level.
3. Extended Standard Theory (EST) – 1970s
Expands Standard Theory by adding semantic interpretation rules.
Unlike Standard Theory, EST does not rely entirely on deep structure to determine
meaning.
Introduces the concept of Revised Extended Standard Theory (REST), which
distinguishes between:
o Deep Structure
o Shallow Structure
o Surface Structure.
4. X-Bar Theory (Late 1970s)
A new model of phrase structure that refines NP, VP, AP, and PP structures.
Key Features:
o Introduces intermediate levels (X') between **words (X) and phrases (XP)*.
o Head-Complement Structure: Phrases have a head (core element) and complements
(additional modifiers).
Example (NP structure):
o Old Theory: NP → Det + N
o X-Bar Theory: NP → (Spec) X’ → X (Comp)
X-Bar Theory helps explain why sentence structures remain consistent across
languages.
5. Government and Binding (GB) Theory – 1980s
Introduced by Chomsky (1981), this theory replaces transformational rules with a
modular structure.
Defines three main levels of structure:
1. D-Structure (Deep Structure)
2. S-Structure (Surface Structure)
3. Logical Form (LF) (Final meaning representation).
Move Alpha (α) Rule: A general transformation that replaces multiple transformational
rules.
Key Sub-Theories:
o Theta Theory: Assigns roles (Agent, Patient, Goal).
o Case Theory: Determines noun phrase positions.
o Binding Theory: Explains pronoun/reference relationships.
6. Universal Grammar (UG)
UG aims to identify common structures in all human languages.
It distinguishes between:
o Principles: Universal rules (e.g., all sentences must have a subject).
o Parameters: Language-specific variations (e.g., Subject-Verb-Object (SVO) in English
vs. Subject-Object-Verb (SOV) in Urdu).
Evidence for UG:
o Children learn languages effortlessly.
o All languages have a similar core structure.
o Certain rules (e.g., word order constraints) apply across languages.
7. The Minimalist Program (1993 – Present)
Chomsky's latest model, aimed at simplifying syntax while maintaining UG principles.
Core Principles:
o Economy of Derivation: Sentences should be generated with minimal
transformations.
o Economy of Representation: Structures should be as simple as possible.
Minimalism emphasizes that:
o Grammar is innate and follows universal rules.
o Complex sentence structures emerge from simple operations.
Impact:
o Influenced AI and cognitive science research.
o Shifted focus from rules to language processing efficiency.
8. Summary Points
Generative Grammar views language as an innate cognitive system.
Standard Theory (1965): Introduced Deep and Surface Structure.
Extended Standard Theory (EST): Included semantic interpretation.
X-Bar Theory: Refined phrase structure.
Government and Binding (GB) Theory: Introduced modular syntax analysis.
Universal Grammar (UG): Explains common linguistic principles.
Minimalist Program (1993): Aims for maximum efficiency with minimal rules.