Residential Building

AT

DANG, NEPAL

Structural Analysis Report

Owner Name: Designed By:

Address: Dang, Nepal NEC Reg. :

March, 2025
Contents
1. Project Detail .......................................................................................... 4
1.2 Building Design Parameters ................................................................................... 5
1.3 Materials ................................................................................................................. 5
1.3.1 Concrete........................................................................................................... 5
1.3.2 Reinforcement ................................................................................................. 5
1.4 Load Calculations ................................................................................................... 6
1.4.1 Dead Load ....................................................................................................... 6
1.4.2 Superimposed Dead Loads .............................................................................. 6
1.4.3 Live Loads ....................................................................................................... 6
1.4.4 Seismic Loads.................................................................................................. 7
1.5 Load Combination ................................................................................................ 10
2. Structural Analysis............................................................................... 11
1.6 3D modeling of the building ................................................................................. 12
3. Design of Elements: .............................................................................. 27
1.6.1 Sample design of Column ............................................................................. 27
1.6.2 Sample design of Beam ................................................................................. 28
1.6.3 Sample Design of Footing ............................................................................. 33
1.6.4 Slab Design.................................................................................................... 34

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 2
Figure 1: Architectural Plan of Building........................................................................................... 4
Figure 2: 3D modeling of the building............................................................................................. 12
Figure 3: Plan of the building .......................................................................................................... 13
Figure 4: Elevation of the building .................................................................................................. 14
Figure 5: Wall Load on the building ................................................................................................ 15
Figure 6: Live Load on the building ................................................................................................ 16
Figure 7: Floor Finishing Load on the building ............................................................................... 17
Figure 8: Story Drift along X-Direction at Ultimate Limit State<0.025*Ru*h ................................ 20
Figure 9: Story Drift along Y-Direction at Ultimate Limit State<0.025*Ru*h ................................ 20
Figure 10: Story Drift along X-Direction at Serviceability Limit State<0.025*Ru*h...................... 21
Figure 11: Story Drift along Y-Direction at Serviceability Limit State<0.025*Ru*h...................... 21
Figure 12: Story Displacement along X-Direction at Ultimate Limit State<0.025*Ru*h................ 22
Figure 13: Story Displacement along Y-Direction at Ultimate Limit State<0.025*Ru*h................ 23
Figure 14: Story Displacement along X-Direction at Serviceability Limit State<0.025*Ru*h ..... 23
Figure 15: Story Displacement along Y-Direction at Serviceability Limit State<0.025*Ru*h
......................................................................................................................................................... 24
Figure 16:Bending Moment along grid 3-3 ..................................................................................... 25
Figure 17: Shear Force Diagram along Grid 3-3 ............................................................................. 26
Figure 18: Reinforcement Details along Grid 1-1............................................................................ 29
Figure 19: Reinforcement Details along Grid 2-2............................................................................ 29
Figure 20: Reinforcement Details along Grid 3-3............................................................................ 30
Figure 21: Reinforcement Details along Grid 4-4............................................................................ 30
Figure 22: Reinforcement Details along Grid 5-5............................................................................ 31
Figure 22: Reinforcement Details along Grid A-A ..................................................................... 31
Figure 23: Reinforcement Details along Grid B-B ...................................................................... 32
Figure 24: Reinforcement Details along Grid C-C .......................................................................... 32

Table 1: Auto Seismic – NBC 105:2020 ........................................................................................... 9

Table 2: Modal Participating Mass Ratios: ...................................................................................... 18
Table 3: Centers of Mass and Rigidity............................................................................................. 18
Table 4: BASE SHEAR CALCULATED ....................................................................................... 18
Table 5: Maximum drift ratios: within the limit of 0.006 ................................................................ 19
Table 6: Maximum Displacements are within limit of 57.6mm ...................................................... 22

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 3
1. Project Detail

Name of the Project: Residence at Dang

Location : Dang,Nepal

Type of Building: The Building covers a total plinth area of 1383.19 sq.ft.
The building has been designed for two number of stories
and staircase cover.

This report has been prepared as a part of the structural engineering analysis and
design of buildings.

Figure 1: Architectural Plan of Building

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 4
1.2 Building Design Parameters
The building consists of a RCC framed structure, which is essentially an assembly of cast-
in-situ-concrete beams and columns. Floors and roof consist of cast-in-place concrete slabs.
Lateral load resisting system consists of bare frame elements only and the system has been
designed to meet the ductility requirements of IS 13920 - 1993.

For the design of the building, the Nepal Standard criteria for earthquake resistant NBC
105:2020 have been referred to. According to the NBC 105:2020 Dang lies in seismic
Zone D. All other factors related with the seismic design were also adopted as for zone D
of NBC 105:2020.

1.3 Materials
Following loads have been considered for the analysis and design of the building based on
the relevant Indian Standards.

1.3.1 Concrete
Concrete is to conform to IS 456: Structural use of concrete. Unless noted otherwise
concrete is to be normal-weight, with a typical dry density of 2400 kg/m3. Concrete is
to achieve the 28-day cube strength as 20 N/mm2and 25 N/mm2.

1.3.2 Reinforcement
Reinforcement bars are to be in accordance with IS 456: specification for carbon
steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete is to be in accordance with IS 1786:
specification for high deformed steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete.

The following design strengths are to be used for the design of concrete and
reinforcement.

Grade of Concrete : M25 for all columns and M20 for all other
Grade of steel : High Yield Fe 500 N/mm2

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 5
1.4 Load Calculations
1.4.1 Dead Load
Dead loads are calculated on the basis of unit weights of the specified construction
materials in accordance with IS 875.
Reinforced concrete: 25 KN / m3 and 20KN/m3
Brick work with plaster: 18.85 KN/m3
Sand/ cement screed: 20 KN/m2

1.4.2 Superimposed Dead Loads

Based on architectural drawing of the building, dead loads due to partition
walls, floor finish and other special purpose services has been calculated.

1.4.3 Live Loads

The Live Load for building has been adopted as given IS 875 - Part VI Section I
Loads for residence buildings.

Room 2 kN/m2

Kitchen 2 kN/m2

Balcony/ lobby 3 kN/m2

For terrace 1.5 kN / m2

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 6
1.4.4 Seismic Loads
CALCULATION OF SEISMIC CO-EFFICENT AS PER NBC 105 :2020
Input:
Location of Building : Dang
Type of Structure: Moment resisting concrete frame
Type of Building : Reinforced Moment Resisting Frame
Seismic Zoning Factor (Table 4.5 NBC 105-2020) Z= 0.35
Importance Factor : (Table 4.6 NBC 105-2020) I= 1
Height of Building : h= 9.6
Method of Analysis: Equivalent Static Method
Soil Type D

Period of Vibration :
For Reinforced Moment Resisting Frame T1 = 1.25*kt h0.75 0.511 Sec
Lower Period of the Flat Part of the Spectrum Ta = 0
Upper Period of the Flat Part of the Spectrum Tc = 2
Peak Spectral Acceleration Normalized by PGA α= 2.25
Coefficient to control the descending branch of the Spectrum K= 0.8

Ref Table 5.2 NBC 105 :2020

Ductility Factor for ULS State Ru = 4
Overstrength Factor for ULS State Ωu = 1.5
Overstrength Factor for SLS State Ωs = 1.25

Calculation of Spectral Shape Factor : Ch (T)

Since Ta<=T1<=Tc Ch (T) = 2.250

Elastic Site Spectra for the Horizontal Loading (Clause 4.1.1 NBC 105-2020) C(T) = Ch(T) Z I = 0.788

Elastic Site Spectra for the Vertical Loading (Clause 4.2 NBC 105-2020) Cv = 2/3*Z 0.233

Elastic Site Spectra for the SLS State (Clause 4.2 NBC 105-2020) Cs = 0.2 * C(T) = 0.158

Horizontal Base Shear Coefficient for Equivalent Static Method :

Horizontal Base Shear Coefficient at the ULS State
Cdu = C(T)/ (Ru Ωu) = 0.131

Horizontal Base Shear Coefficient at the SLS State

Cds = Cs/ Ωs = 0.126

Exponent related to the structural period k 1.0055

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 7
  Load parameter
a. Dead Load:- as per IS 875
b. Live Load:- as per IS 875
c. Seismic Load: -as per NBC 105:2020
1. Zone Factor:-0.35 (for Dang)
2. Importance Factor:-1.0

3. Fundamental Time Period: - 0.511 sec

Period of vibration (NBC 105:2020)

Using Empirical Equations
T1 = kt H ¾

Where, kt
= 0.075 for Moment resisting concrete frame
= 0.085 for Moment resisting structural steel frame
= 0.075 for Eccentrically braced structural steel frame
= 0.05 for all other structural systems

Calculation
T1 = kt H ¾ kt = 0.075
H = 9.6

Amplification of Approximate Period

The approximate fundamental time period calculated
using empirical equation shall be increased by a factor of 1.25.

T = 0.511 sec
4. Seismic Weight: - 2971.6434 KN
5. Base Shear (Vb x/y):
a. ULS =389.2853 KN
b. SLS = 374.4271 KN
6. Soil Type: D
7. Damping:-0.05

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 8
 8. Building Height Exp. K= 1
 Method of analysis: Static Coefficient Method of Analysis
a. No. of modes considered: 12
b. Modal Mass Participation: 100,100: greater than 90 %

 Total Deflection of Building: -

Ultimate Limit State<0.025*Ru*h
a. Along X - direction: 21.50mm
b. Along Y- direction: 20.99 mm
 Inter Stores Drift:
Ultimate Limit State <0.025*Ru
a. Along X - direction:0.002847
b. Along Y- direction: 0.002532
 Load combination: 105:2020
 Concrete design Code: IS 456: 2000
 Ductile Detailing Code: IS 13920: 1993
 Concrete Grade: M25 in specific columns and M20 in other structural
members
 Reinforcement Grade: Fe500

Table 1: Auto Seismic – NBC 105:2020

Ecc.
Load Directi Eccentr Overridde Top Bottom Weight Base
Pattern Type on icity n Story Story C K Used Shear
% kN kN
EQX Seis X+ 0.1 1.00 2971.643 389.285
ULS mic Ecc. Y 10 No Story3 Base 31 55 4 3
EQY Seis Y+ 0.1 1.00 2971.643 389.285
ULS mic Ecc. X 10 No Story3 Base 31 55 4 3
EQX Seis X+ 0.1 1.00 2971.643 374.427
SLS mic Ecc. Y 10 No Story3 Base 26 55 4 1
EQY Seis Y+ 0.1 1.00 2971.643 374.427
SLS mic Ecc. X 10 No Story3 Base 26 55 4 1

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 9
1.5 Load Combination
The load combination has been taken as given NBC 105:2020. The said code has
recommended the following load combination

 1.2DL + 1.5LL
 DL + λLL + -EQ
Where, λ = 0.3 for other usage
Design Assumptions
Concrete Grade, M25 fck = 25 MPa for column
Concrete Grade, M20 fck = 20 MPa for another member
Steel Grade, Fe 500 fy = 500 MPa for alL

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 10
2. Structural Analysis
The analysis and design have been carried out using software called ETABS v16.2.1, which
is a special purpose computer program developed specifically for building structures. It
provides the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to create, modify, analyze,
design, and optimize the structural elements in a building model. The building geometry
based on architectural drawings been generated using above named software. The dead load,
live load and lateral loads were supplied to the digital models as per standard code of
practices. Several analysis runs were performed to achieve the best result to meet the design
and service requirements.

For the analysis, following loading parameters were considered:

i. Self-weight of the frames and slabs

ii. Floor finishing dead loads

iii. Fixed wall loads as per architectural drawings

iv. Staircase load

v. Partition wall loads as per architectural drawings only.

vi. Live loads

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 11
1.6 3D modeling of the building
i. 3D model of the building
ii. Plan of the building
iii. Elevation of the building

Figure 2: 3D modeling of the building

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 12
 Figure 3: Plan of the building

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 13
 Figure 4: Elevation of the building

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 14
 Figure 5: Wall Load on the building

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 15
 Figure 6: Live Load on the building

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 16
 Figure 7: Floor Finishing Load on the building

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 17
Table 2: Modal Participating Mass Ratios:
Case Mode Period UX UY Sum UX Sum UY
sec
Modal 1 0.586 0.8312 0.0007 0.8312 0.0007
Modal 2 0.555 0.0023 0.7793 0.8335 0.7801
Modal 3 0.502 0.005 0.0714 0.8385 0.8515
Modal 4 0.239 0.0747 0.0059 0.9133 0.8574
Modal 5 0.232 0.0039 0.0723 0.9172 0.9296
Modal 6 0.19 0.0211 0.0005 0.9382 0.9301
Modal 7 0.162 0.0309 0.0076 0.9692 0.9377
Modal 8 0.153 0.0105 0.0585 0.9797 0.9962
Modal 9 0.142 0.0203 0.0038 1 1
Modal 10 0.007 0 0 1 1
Modal 11 0.006 0 0 1 1
Modal 12 0.006 0 0 1 1

Table 3: Centers of Mass and Rigidity

Story Diaphragm Mass X Mass Y XCM YCM Cumulative X Cumulative Y
kg kg m m kg kg
Story1 D1 110468.05 110468.05 4.917 7.9757 110468.05 110468.05
Story2 D2 62505.97 62505.97 4.6145 8.1302 62505.97 62505.97
Story3 D3 11016.54 11016.54 6.858 4.8345 11016.54 11016.54

Table 4: BASE SHEAR CALCULATED

Load Locatio
Story Case/Combo n P VX VY T MX MY
k
N kN kN kN-m kN-m kN-m
Story
3 EQX ULS Top 0 -49.6864 0 253.6211 0 0
Story
3 EQX ULS Bottom 0 -49.6864 0 253.6211 0 -158.9964
Story
3 EQY ULS Top 0 0 -49.6864 -351.9447 0 0
Story
3 EQY ULS Bottom 0 0 -49.6864 -351.9447 158.9964 0
Story
3 EQX SLS Top 0 -47.79 0 243.9409 0 0
Story
3 EQX SLS Bottom 0 -47.79 0 243.9409 0 -152.9278
Story
3 EQY SLS Top 0 0 -47.79 -338.5117 0 0
Story
3 EQY SLS Bottom 0 0 -47.79 -338.5117 152.9278 0

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 18
 Story - 8.415E-
2 EQX ULS Top 0 246.0674 07 2066.7387 0 -158.9964
Story - 8.415E- -
2 EQX ULS Bottom 0 246.0674 07 2066.7387 0.000002835 -946.4122
Story -
2 EQY ULS Top 0 0 -246.0674 1308.8478 158.9964 0
Story -
2 EQY ULS Bottom 0 0 -246.0674 1308.8478 946.4122 0
Story - 8.094E-
2 EQX SLS Top 0 236.6756 07 1987.8556 0 -152.9278
Story - 8.094E- -
2 EQX SLS Bottom 0 236.6756 07 1987.8556 0.000002727 -910.2896
Story -
2 EQY SLS Top 0 0 -236.6755 1258.8917 152.9278 0
Story -
2 EQY SLS Bottom 0 0 -236.6755 1258.8917 910.2896 0
Story - 8.417E- -
1 EQX ULS Top 0 389.2853 07 3383.0249 0.000002835 -946.4122
Story - 8.417E- - -
1 EQX ULS Bottom 0 389.2853 07 3383.0249 0.000005529 2192.1252
Story -
1 EQY ULS Top 0 0 -389.2853 2084.5386 946.4122 0
Story -
1 EQY ULS Bottom 0 0 -389.2853 2084.5386 2192.1251 0
Story - 8.096E- -
1 EQX SLS Top 0 374.4271 07 3253.9018 0.000002727 -910.2896
Story - 8.096E- - -
1 EQX SLS Bottom 0 374.4271 07 3253.9018 0.000005318 2108.4563
Story
1 EQY SLS Top 0 0 -374.4271 -2004.976 910.2896 0
Story
1 EQY SLS Bottom 0 0 -374.4271 -2004.976 2108.4562 0

Table 5: Maximum drift ratios: within the limit of 0.006

Story Load Case/Combo Direction Drift Label X Y Z
m m m
Story3 EQX ULS X 0.002043 12 8.8392 3.81 9.6
Story3 EQY ULS Y 0.00194 13 8.8392 7.1628 9.6
Story3 EQX SLS X 0.001965 12 8.8392 3.81 9.6
Story3 EQY SLS Y 0.001866 13 8.8392 7.1628 9.6
Story2 EQX ULS X 0.002847 26 10.3392 15.4178 6.4
Story2 EQY ULS Y 0.002532 26 10.3392 15.4178 6.4
Story2 EQX SLS X 0.002739 26 10.3392 15.4178 6.4
Story2 EQY SLS Y 0.002436 26 10.3392 15.4178 6.4
Story1 EQX ULS X 0.002496 15 8.8392 15.4178 3.2
Story1 EQY ULS Y 0.002173 15 8.8392 15.4178 3.2
Story1 EQX SLS X 0.0024 15 8.8392 15.4178 3.2
Story1 EQY SLS Y 0.00209 15 8.8392 15.4178 3.2

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 19
 Figure 8: Story Drift along X-Direction at Ultimate Limit State<0.025*Ru*h

Figure 9: Story Drift along Y-Direction at Ultimate Limit State<0.025*Ru*h

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 20
 Figure 10: Story Drift along X-Direction at Serviceability Limit State<0.025*Ru*h

Figure 11: Story Drift along Y-Direction at Serviceability Limit State<0.025*Ru*h

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 21
Table 6: Maximum Displacements are within limit of 57.6mm
Story Diaphragm Load Case/Combo UX UY RZ Point X Y Z
mm mm rad m m m
Story3 D3 EQX ULS 21.014 -0.644 -0.000209 69 6.858 4.8345 9.6
Story3 D3 EQY ULS 1.15 19.98 0.000514 69 6.858 4.8345 9.6
Story3 D3 EQX SLS 20.212 -0.62 -0.000201 69 6.858 4.8345 9.6
Story3 D3 EQY SLS 1.106 19.218 0.000495 69 6.858 4.8345 9.6
Story2 D2 EQX ULS 15.317 -0.026 -0.000244 70 4.6145 8.1302 6.4
Story2 D2 EQY ULS -0.117 13.462 0.000315 70 4.6145 8.1302 6.4
Story2 D2 EQX SLS 14.732 -0.025 -0.000235 70 4.6145 8.1302 6.4
Story2 D2 EQY SLS -0.113 12.948 0.000303 70 4.6145 8.1302 6.4
Story1 D1 EQX ULS 6.959 -0.053 -0.000138 74 4.917 7.9757 3.2
Story1 D1 EQY ULS -0.031 6.412 0.000138 74 4.917 7.9757 3.2
Story1 D1 EQX SLS 6.693 -0.051 -0.000133 74 4.917 7.9757 3.2
Story1 D1 EQY SLS -0.029 6.167 0.000133 74 4.917 7.9757 3.2

Figure 12: Story Displacement along X-Direction at Ultimate Limit State<0.025*Ru*h

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 22
 Figure 13: Story Displacement along Y-Direction at Ultimate Limit State<0.025*Ru*h

Figure 14: Story Displacement along X-Direction at Serviceability Limit State<0.025*Ru*h

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 23
 Figure 15: Story Displacement along Y-Direction at Serviceability Limit State<0.025*Ru*h

Note: Since the limiting value of drift ratio and displacement at serviceability limit state
(SLS) is 0.006 and 0.006*h respectably which is greater than the obtained drift ratio and
displacement along both directions even in ultimate limit state (ULS). So, we can skip
these checks for serviceability limit state using the Horizontal Base Shear Coefficient at
the SLS as this coefficient is less for SLS than ULS

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 24
 Figure 16:Bending Moment along grid 3-3

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 25
 Figure 17: Shear Force Diagram along Grid 3-3

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 26
3. Design of Elements:
The design of all structural elements is done using ‘Limit State Method’. All relevant Limit
State is considered in design to ensure adequate safety and serviceability.

The design includes design for durability, construction and use in service should be
considered as a whole. The realization of design objectives requires compliance with clearly
defined standards for materials, production, workmanship, and also maintenance and use of
structure in service.

This section includes all the design process of sample calculation for a single element as
column, beam, slab and foundation.

1.6.1 Sample design of Column

Column Design
Combo ID DL+0.3LL+EQX
Element C10 14"X14"
FF
Axial Force Pu = 200.602 KN
Factored Moment about x-axis Mux = 4.012 KN-m
Factored Moment about y-axis Muy = 83.201 KN-m
Breadth b= 350.000 mm
Depth D= 350.000 mm
Grade of concrete fck = 25.000 N/mm2
Grade of reinforcement fy = 500.000 N/mm2
Cover considered d' = 40.000 mm
d'/D 0.114
Percentage of steel Pt = 0.946 %
Pt/fck = 0.038
Pu/(fck*b*D) = 0.066
From graph of SP16, Mu/(fck*b*D^2 ) 0.100
Moment carrying capacity of Column
Along X-axis (Mux1) = (Mu/fckbD^2)*(fck*b*D^2) 107.188 KN-m
Along Y-axis (Muy1)= (Mu/fck*b*D^2)* (fck*D*b^2) 107.188 KN-m
Gross Area (Ac) = 122,500.000 mm2
Area of steel taken from software 1,159.00 mm2
Axial Load Carrying capacity of Column (Pz)=0.45*fck*Ac+0.75*fy*Asc 1,812.750 KN
Pu/Pz 0.111
Mux/Mux1 0.037
Muy/Muy1 0.776
α =1+((Pu/Pz-0.2)/(0.8-0.2))*1 1.000
(Mux/Mux1) ^ α + (Muy/Muy1) ^ α 0.814 <1
SAFE
Area of reinforcement required(As) 1,159.000 mm2

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 27
1.6.2 Sample design of Beam
Beam Design
Along grid C-C(4-5)
FF
Breadth b= 230.000 mm
Depth D= 350.000 mm
Grade of concrete fck = 20.000 N/mm2
Grade of reinforcement fy = 500.000 N/mm2
Cover considered d' = 25.000 mm
effective depth d= 325.000
Limiting bending moment (Mlim)=0.133*fck*b*d^2 64.62 KN-m
Moment at left span DL+0.3LL+EQY -18.2342
Mu<Mlim
Minimum tension steel= 0.85*b*d/fy 127.08 mm2
Mu<Mlim
Mu= 0.87*fy*Ast*(d-(fy*Ast)/(fck*b)
a 0.03
b -325.00

Ast= -127.72 mm2

Area of steel from software= 399.00 mm2

Moment at mid span DL+0.3LL+EQY 11.9228

Mu<Mlim
Minimum tension steel= 0.85*b*d/fy 127.08 mm2
Mu<Mlim
Mu= 0.87*fy*Ast*(d-(fy*Ast)/(fck*b)
a 0.03
b -325.00

Ast= 84.89 mm2

Area of steel from software= 173.00 mm2

Moment at right end DL+0.3LL+EQY -14.49 KN-m

Mu<Mlim
Minimum tension steel= 0.85*b*d/fy 127.08 mm2
Mu<Mlim
Mu= 0.87*fy*Ast*(d-(fy*Ast)/(fck*b)
a 0.03
b -325.00

Ast= -101.70 mm2

Area of steel from software= 408.00 mm2

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 28
 Figure 18: Reinforcement Details along Grid 1-1

Figure 19: Reinforcement Details along Grid 2-2

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 29
 Figure 20: Reinforcement Details along Grid 3-3

Figure 21: Reinforcement Details along Grid 4-4

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 30
 Figure 22: Reinforcement Details along Grid 5-5

Figure 23: Reinforcement Details along Grid A-A

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 31
 Figure 24: Reinforcement Details along Grid B-B

Figure 25: Reinforcement Details along Grid C-C

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 32
1.6.3 Sample Design of Footing
Design for Footing
Isolated Footing
Fck = 20
Fy = 500
Depth of Foundation (Df) = 1.52 m
Allowable soil pressure (Palw) = 120 KN/m2
yt 16
Effective cover (d') = 50
d0 = 200
MODEL NODE 14
Pu From Model 384.80
Pu (KN) 423.28
Mux (from model) 2.5258 KN-m
Muy (from model) -8.3103 KN-m
Width of column (Bc) 350 mm
Depth of column (Dc) 350 mm
Required Area 3.39 m2
Required Length 6.04 ft
Required Breadth 6.04 ft
Provided
Length of Foundation (Lf) 6.75 ft
Breadth of Foundation(Bf) 6.75 ft
Actual Bearing Capacity (S) 101.75 KN/m2
BM/M 37.07
Effective depth according to moment (d M) 80.80 mm
Assumed Deptrh (D) 300.00 mm
Bar dia 12 mm
Spacing 15.00 cm c/c
Ast 3.77 (cm2)/M
Effective depth due to tapper section (d) 235.36 (mm)
p2 94.28 KN/m2
p3 101.75 KN/m2
BM2 34.35
BM3 37.07
K 40.00
percentage of tension steel (pt %) 0.16
One way shear
Vu 129.42
Shear strength of M20 concrete (Tc>) 0.30 N/mm2
Shear Stress (Tv) 0.27 N/mm2
Tc>Tv OK

Two Way shear

Vu 395.78
Perimeter (b0) 2.34 m
Shear strength of concrete (Tc' >) 1.12 N/mm2
Shear Stress (Tv) 0.72 N/mm2
Tc'>Tv OK

Description size(mm) D
L B (mm)
F1
2025 2025 300

d/2 d0 dia spacing

(mm) (mm) (mm)
149.00 200 12.00 150

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 33
1.6.4 Slab Design
SLAB DESIGN
1. DESIGN DATA

Longer Span of the critical Slab (Ly) = 4.87 m

Shorter Span of the critical Slab (Lx)= 3.81 m
Grade of Concrete used (σck) = 25 N/mm2
Width of slab, b = 1000 mm
Grade of steel used (σy) = 500 N/mm2
Unit weight of Marble= 27 kN/m3
Unit weight of screed = 20.4 kN/m3
Unit weight of plaster = 20.4 kN/m3
Thickness of screed = 25 mm
Thickness of plaster = 12.5 mm
Assume Thickness of slab (D) = 125 mm
Effective depth of slab d= 105 mm

2. BENDING MOMENT COEFFICIENT

Type of slab Panal = 2 Adjescent Edge Discontinous

Aspect Ratio of the slab Considered Ly/Lx = 1.279
Bending Moment Coefficient for 1.2 for 1.3 for 1.279
Coeff for -ve moment, βx = 0.06 0.065 0.064
Coeff for +ve moment, βx = 0.045 0.049 0.048
Coeff for -ve moment, βy = 0.047 0.047
Coeff for +ve moment, βy = 0.035 0.035

3. LOAD CALCULATION

Dead load of slab = 3.125 kN/m2

Dead load due to screed = 0.51 kN/m2
Dead load due to plaster = 0.255 kN/m2
Dead load due to Partition Wall = 1.42 kN/m2
Live load at Slab = 3 kN/m2
Total Load = 8.31 kN/m2
Factored Design Load = 12.465 kN/m2
Factored Design Load per meter = 12.465 kN/m

4. MOMENT CALCULATION

Design -ve moment for short span, Mx 11.6 kN-m

Design +ve moment for short span, Mx 8.7 kN-m

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 34
 Design -ve moment for long span, My 8.5 kN-m
Design +ve moment for long span, My 6.3 kN-m

5. CALCULATION OF REINFORCEMENT

Design for -ve Reinforcement =

Along Short span 267.0 mm2
Along Long span 193.3 mm2
Design for +ve Reinforcement =
Along Short span 198.4 mm2
Along Long span 142.5 mm2

Minimum reinforcement required (Ast)= 187.5 mm2

Bar dia. Area

Spacing Spacing Area
Direction Provided Required No. of bar
Required mm Provided mm provided mm2
mm mm2

Shorter
Support 8 267 6 166.67 150 334.93
Shorter
Mid 8 198 4 253.28 150 334.93
Longer
Support 8 193 4 259.89 150 334.93
Longer
Mid 8 143 4 267.95 150 334.93

6. CHECK FOR SHEAR

Shear coefficient = 0.60

Design Shear Force Vu = 28.49 kN
Nominal shear stress (tv) = 0.27 N/mm2
Percent tension steel (Pt) = 0.27 N/mm2
Shear strength of M20 Concrete and 0.27% steel tc = 0.38 N/mm2
Shear Strength Coefficient for(d<=150) ks = 1.30 N/mm2
Shear strength in slab t'c = 0.49 N/mm2
Maximum Shear stress for M20 Grade Concrete tc, max = 2.80 N/mm2
Safe in shear

7. CHECK FOR DEFLECTION:

Required Tension reinforcement % for short span Pt= 0.20

Provided Tension reinforcement % for short span Pt= 0.27
Basic value of span to effective depth (L/d) ) ratio α = 26
Modification factor for span > 10m β = 1

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 35
 Mu/bd2= 0.79
Steel stress of service fs= 171.75
Required modification factor for tension reinforcement 1.40
Actual Modification factor for tension reinforcement =γ 2.00
Allowable short span to effective depth ratio Lx/d = 52.00
Calculated short span to effective depth ratio (Lx/d) = 36.29
Safe in deflection

Structural Analysis Report for Residence

At Dang, Nepal 36