0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

Screening Final

The document provides an overview of screening processes, including methods like dry and wet screening, and the importance of particle size distribution. It details various types of testing sieves, industrial screening equipment, and terminologies associated with screening. Additionally, it includes mathematical formulas for mean diameters, recovery, rejection, and effectiveness of screens, along with practical problems and solutions related to screening operations.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

Screening Final

The document provides an overview of screening processes, including methods like dry and wet screening, and the importance of particle size distribution. It details various types of testing sieves, industrial screening equipment, and terminologies associated with screening. Additionally, it includes mathematical formulas for mean diameters, recovery, rejection, and effectiveness of screens, along with practical problems and solutions related to screening operations.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

1

SCREENING

SCREENING – separates a mixture of various sizes of particles into two  TYPES OF TESTING SIEVES
or more portions, each of which is more uniform in size
1. Tyler Standard Sieve Series – series of screens based upon a 200-mesh
of particle than the original mixture.
screen with wire 0.0021 in thick and with an opening of 0.0029 in
– passing a material over a surface provided with openings
of the desired size. (0.0074 cm). The other sizes vary by a fixed ratio of √2. The mesh is
only up to 400.
 SCREENING METHODS 2. United States Sieve Series – introduced by the National Bureau of
Standards from the Tyler Series being based on a 1-mm opening (No.
A. Dry Screening – the treatment of a material containing a natural 4
18 mesh) and varying by √2.
amount of moisture or a material that has been dried before 3. International Test Sieve Series – similar to both but the wires have
screening. different gauges.
B. Wet Screening – an operation when water is added to the material
being treated for the purpose of washing the fine material through  PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIUTION CONVETIONS
the screen.
FIRST SECOND THIRD
 IMPORTANCE OF SCREENING 1 1 1
Oversize, in + in + in
4 4 4
1. Means of preparing a product for sale or for subsequent operation Oversize, 20 mesh + 20 mesh + 20 mesh
(as in marketing of coal where the size is the basis for its classification Through 10 mesh on 20 mesh - 10 + 20 - 10/20
for sale) 1 1 1 1 1 1
Through in on in - + - /
2. Means of analysis, either to control or gauge the effectiveness of 4 8 4 8 4 8
another operation such as crushing or grinding (to control the rates Undersize, 200 mesh -200 -200
of reactions involving solids)
3. To determine the value of a product for some specific application
 INDUSTRIAL SCREENING EQUIPMENT
 TERMINOLOGIES 1. Grizzlies – widely used for screening large sizes, particularly of 1 inch
and over.
 Mesh – number of apertures per linear inch
2. Stationary Screens – made of punched metal plates or woven wire
Example: A 10-mesh screen will have 10 openings per inch
mesh, usually set at an angle with the horizontal up to about 60 ͦ.
 Screen Aperture – clear space between the individual wires of the Suitable for small scale operation such as screening sand, gravel or
screen coal.
1
Aperture Size = - D (in) 3. Vibrated Screens – used where large tonnages are to be treated. Most
N
of these screens have intense, high speed (1500 to 7200
where N = mesh number vibrations/min).
D = wire diameter (in) 4. Oscillating Screens – characterized by low-speed (300 to 400 rpm)
 Undersize – particles which oscillations. Screens in this group are usually used from ½ inch to 60-
pass through the screen mesh. Silk cloth are often used.
openings 5. Reciprocating Screens – used extensively and are standard equipment
 Oversize – particles which do in many chemical and processing plants for handling fine separations
not pass through screen even down to 300-mesh.
openings 6. Trommels or Revolving Screens – consist of a cylindrical screen
 Screen Interval – relationship rotating about its axis. Revolves at very low speed of 15 to 20 rpm.
between the successive sizes of Efficiency is relatively low.
screen openings in a series 7. Gyratory Screens – box-like machines either round or square with a
 Cut sharpness – characterizes series of screen cloths nested atop one another.
the quality of the sieving into
individual fractions
 Sieving Loss – difference in
weight between the original
sample and the sum of the
recovered fractions
 Stratification – a phenomenon
occurs as vibration is passed Grizzly Trommel
through a bed of material. This
causes coarse (larger) materials
 TESTING SIEVE SHAKERS
to rise and finer (smaller)
materials to descend within the 1. Ro-Tap Testing Sieve Shaker
bed. 2. End-Strak Testing Sieve Shaker
3. Dynamic Sieve Shaker

This study source was downloaded by 100000810032966 from CourseHero.com on 04-05-2022 21:33:15 GMT -05:00
craledesma

https://www.coursehero.com/file/88251110/SCREENING-FINALpdf/
2

 MEAN DIAMETERS  RECOVERY


For a particle of any shape, mass fraction x in the solid mixture is: Recovery is the fraction of the desired material recovered.

x1 = kn1 d13 where k = constant depending on PxP


If the desired material is the undersize: Recovery =
the shape of the particle FxF

Mass Mean Diameter Mean Mass Diameter RxR


If the desired material is the oversize: Recovery =
FxF
∑ n1 d 4
1 1 3 ∑ n1 d 3
dV =
∑ n1 d 3
= ∫0 d1 dx d′V = √ 1
= 3√
1
1 ∑ n1 1dx
∫0 3  REJECTION
d 1
Rejection is the fraction undesired material rejected.
Surface Mean Diameter Mean Surface Diameter
P(1−xP )
If the desired material is the undersize: Rejection = 1 -
∑ n1 d 3
1 1 1dx F(1−xF )
dS =
∑ n1 d 2
= 1dx ∑ n1 d 2 ∫0 d
1 ∫0 3
d
d′S =√ 1
=√ 1dx
1
1 ∑ n1 ∫0 3
d1 R(1−xR )
If the desired material is the oversize: Rejection = 1 -
F (1−xF)
Length Mean Diameter Mean Length Diameter

∑ n1 d 1
1dx
∫0 d ∫0 2
1dx  EFFECTIVENESS OR EFFICIENCY OF SCREEN
1 ∑ n1 d 1 d
dL =
∑ n1
= 1dx d′L = = 1
1dx
∫0 2
d1
∑ n1 ∫0 3 Effectiveness = (Recovery)(Rejection)
d1

PxP P(1−xP )
Effectiveness = ( ) [1 − ] or
FxF F(1−xF )
 OVERALL MATERIAL BALANCE AND SIZE BALANCE
Let x = mass fraction of the desired material
RxR R(1−xR )
Effectiveness = ( ) [1 − ]
CASE 1: THREE-STREAMS SCREENING FxF F(1−xF )

Note: Screen effectiveness is independent whether the desired


material is the undersize or oversize.

 SCREENING CAPACITY
The capacity of a screen is measured by the mass of material that
can be fed per unit time to a unit area of the screen.

F
Capacity =
At
 Overall Material Balance: F=R+P
Note: Capacity and effectiveness are opposing factors. To obtain
 Size Balance: FxF = RxR + PxP maximum effectiveness, the capacity must be small.
P x −x R x −x
From Size Balance: = xF −xR and = x F −xU where xU = xP  US SIEVE SERIES AND TYLER EQUIVALENTS
F P R F R U

CASE 2: FOUR-STREAMS SCREENING

 Overall Material Balance: F=R+U+P

 Size Balance: FxF = RxR + UxU + PxP

This study source was downloaded by 100000810032966 from CourseHero.com on 04-05-2022 21:33:15 GMT -05:00
craledesma

https://www.coursehero.com/file/88251110/SCREENING-FINALpdf/
3

PROBLEMS

1. What is the clear opening of a 200-mesh screen in the Tyler 6. The separation of comminuted sphalerite ore occurs in parallel -60
Standard screen series? US Standard sieve screens. There are 8 screens with size 8’ x 24’.
Solution: The analysis of the fractions are
From Table 19.6 (PHB 7th Edition):
Mesh Feed Size Oversize Undersize
Aperture Size(200-mesh) = 0.074 mm
-10 + 20 0.032 0.285 0.094
-20 + 40 0.234 0.254 0.103
2. What is the wire diameter of a 14-mesh screen (Tyler Standard)?
-40 + 60 0.356 0.251 0.203
Solution:
-60 + 80 0.234 0.171 0.242
From Table 19.6 (PHB 7th Edition): -80 + 100 0.086 0.039 0.206
Wire diameter(14-mesh) = 0.0256 inch -100 + 120 0.04 - 0.134
-120 0.018 - 0.018
3. What is the wire diameter of a 10-mesh screen whose aperture is
0.065 inch?
Solution: Calculate the following:
a) The effectiveness of the screening operation
1 1
Aperture Size = - D → 0.065 = –D b) The capacity of the process in ton/day-ft 2 if 450 000 l/h of
N 10
product is produced
D = 0.035 inch Solution:

4. If the total percentage of particles larger than the screen opening For 60-mesh below:
in the feed, product and undersize are 36%, 89%, and 3%, Mesh Feed Size Oversize Undersize
respectively, calculate the effectiveness of the screen. -60 + 80 0.234 0.171 0.242
Solution: -80 + 100 0.086 0.039 0.206
-100 + 120 0.04 - 0.134
In terms of undersize mass fractions: -120 0.018 - 0.018
xF = 1 – 0.36 = 0.64 Sum 0.378 0.21 0.6
xR = 1 – 0.89 = 0.11
xP = 1 – 0.03 = 0.97 P x −x 0.378−0.21
= xF −xR = = 0.43
F P R 0.6−0.21
P xF −xR 0.64−0.11
=x = 0.97−0.11 = 0.616
F P −xR a) Effectiveness of the screening operation
PxP P(1−xP ) PxP P(1−xP )
Effectiveness = ( ) [1 – ](100) Effectiveness = ( ) [1 – ](100)
FxF F(1−xF ) FxF F(1−xF )
0.97 0.616(1−0.97) 0.6 0.43(1−0.6)
= (0.616)( ) [1 – ](100) = (0.43)( ) [1 – ](100)
0.64 1−0.64 0.378 1−0.378
Effectiveness = 88.6 % Effectiveness = 49.4 %

5. It is desired to separate a mixture of sugar crystals into two b) Capacity of the process
fractions, a coarse fraction retained on an 8-mesh screen, and a fine
Total Area = (8)(8 ft)(24 ft) = 1536 ft 2
fraction passing through it. Screen analysis of feed, coarse and fine
450 000
fractions show F= = 1 046 512 lb/h
0.43
Mass fraction of +8 particles in feed = 0.46 F
Mass fraction of +8 particles in coarse fraction = 0.88 Capacity =
At
Mass fraction of +8 particles in fine fraction = 0.32 1 046 512 lb/h 1 ton 24 h
=
(1536 ft2 )
(2200 lb) (1 day)
Calculate the overall effectiveness of the screen used for the
Capacity = 7.4 ton/day-𝐟𝐭 𝟐
separation purpose per 100 kg of feed.
Solution: 7. The ore containing bauxite is fed in a 20/28 vibrating screen such that
the product is scraped from the 28-mesh screen. The oversize
In terms of undersize mass fractions:
comprises 42% of the ore fed. The analysis of each fractions are as
xF = 1 – 0.46 = 0.54 follows:
xR = 1 – 0.88 = 0.12
xP = 1 – 0.32 = 0.68 Mesh Feed Size Oversize Undersize Product
P xF −xR 0.54−0.12 8/10 0.124 0.563 - 0.013
=x = 0.68−0.12 = 0.75
F P −xR 10/14 0.276 0.357 - 0.148
PxP P(1−xP ) 20/28 0.231 0.025 0.145 0.453
Effectiveness = ( ) [1 – ](100)
FxF F(1−xF ) 28/35 0.106 0.055 0.242 0.247
0.68 0.75(1−0.68) 48/65 0.158 - 0.457 0.139
= (0.75)( ) [1 – ](100)
0.54 1−0.54 65/110 0.105 - 0.161 -
Effectiveness = 45.17 %
Calculate the recovery of the 20/28 product.

This study source was downloaded by 100000810032966 from CourseHero.com on 04-05-2022 21:33:15 GMT -05:00
craledesma

https://www.coursehero.com/file/88251110/SCREENING-FINALpdf/
4

Solution: b) Number of vibrating screens


From the analysis: xF = 0.231 ; xR = 0.025 ; xU = 0.145 ; xP = 0.453 8 tons/day 1 day 1h 2 200 lbs
F= ( ) (60 min) ( ) = 90.5 lbs/min
0.6485 5h 1 ton
Basis: F = 100
OMB: Size Balance: 90.5
No. of vibrating screens = = 3.62 ≈ 4 vibrating screens
F=R+U+P FxF = RxR + UxU + PxP 25
100 = 42 + U + P 0.231(100) = 0.025(42) + 0.145U + 0.453P
U + P = 58 22.05 = 0.145U + 0.453P 9. Alluvia (ore of gold) is crushed and classified in parallel -80+120 mesh
(Eq. 1) (Eq. 2) vibrating screens each with capacity of 15 lbs/min. Test analysis for
the four streams gives the following data:
Solving Eqs. 1 & 2 simultaneously for U and P:
U = 13.7 and P = 44.29 Mesh Feed Size Undersize Oversize Product
PxP 44.29(0.453) + 25 0.001 - 0.032 -
Recovery = = x 100 = 86.8 %
FxF 100(0.231) - 25 + 42 0.012 - 0.075 0.073
8. Dried cod liver is crushed and classified in parallel -20+60 mesh - 42 + 65 0.053 - 0.210 0.130
vibrating screens each with capacity of 25 lbs/min. Test analysis for - 65 + 80 0.092 0.032 0.432 0.190
the sour streams gives the following data: - 80 + 100 0.185 0.082 0.210 0.250
- 100 + 120 0.234 0.213 0.030 0.245
Mesh Feed Size Undersize Oversize Product - 120 + 140 0.301 0.453 0.011 0.080
+ 10 0.04 - 0.173 0.004 - 140 + 200 0.122 0.220 - 0.032
- 10 + 15 0.095 - 0.378 0.054
- 15 + 20 0.112 0.001 0.230 0.104 Calculate the following:
- 20 + 35 0.267 0.054 0.123 0.240 a) The effectiveness of the vibrating screen if 5 % of the feed is in
- 35 - 42 0.287 0.083 0.061 0.393 the undersize
b) The number of vibrating screens required to obtain 13.6 tons/day
- 42 + 60 0.073 0.183 0.022 0.178
of product. Assume 6 operating hours per day.
-60 + 80 0.066 0.353 0.013 0.020
Solution:
- 80 - 120 0.05 0.213 - 0.007
- 120 + 150 0.01 0.113 - - For -80+120 mesh:
Mesh Feed Size Undersize Oversize Product
Calculate the following:
- 80 + 100 0.185 0.082 0.210 0.250
a) The effectiveness of the vibrating screen if 10 % of the feed is
- 100 + 120 0.234 0.213 0.030 0.245
in the oversize
Sum 0.419 0.295 0.240 0.495
b) The number of vibrating screens required to obtain 8 tons/day
of product. Assume 5 operating hours per day.
Solution: Basis: F = 100
OMB: Size Balance:
For - 20 + 60 mesh: F=R+U+P FxF = RxR + UxU + Px P
Mesh Feed Size Undersize Oversize Product 100 = R + 5 + P 100(0.419) = 0.240R + 0.295(5) + 0.495P
- 20 + 35 0.267 0.054 0.123 0.240 R + P = 95 40.425 = 0.240R + 0.495P
- 35 - 42 0.287 0.083 0.061 0.393 (Eq. 1) (Eq. 2)
- 42 + 60 0.073 0.183 0.022 0.178
Sum 0.627 0.32 0.206 0.811 Solving Eqs. 1 & 2 simultaneously for R and P:
R = 25.88 and P = 69.12
Basis: F = 100 P 69.12
= = 0.6912
OMB: Size Balance: F 100
F=R+U+P FxF = RxR + UxU + PxP a) Effectiveness of the vibrating screen
100 = 10 + U + P 100(0.627) = 10(0.206) + 0.32U + 0.811P PxP P(1−xP )
U + P = 90 60.64 = 0.32U + 0.811P Effectiveness = ( ) [1 – ](100)
FxF F(1−xF )
(Eq. 1) (Eq. 2) 0.495 0.6912(1−0.495)
= (0.6912)( ) [1 – ](100)
0.419 1−0.419
Solving Eqs. 1 & 2 simultaneously for U and P: Effectiveness = 32.60 %
U = 25.15 and P = 64.85 b) Number of vibrating screens
P 64.85 13.6 tons/day 1 day 1h 2 200 lbs
= = 0.6485 F= ( ) (60 min) ( ) = 120.2 lbs/min
F 100 0.6912 6h 1 ton
a) Effectiveness of the vibrating screen 120.2
PxP P(1−xP ) No. of vibrating screens = = 8.01 ≈ 8 vibrating screens
Effectiveness = ( ) [1 – )
](100) 15
FxF F(1−xF
0.811 0.6485(1−0.811)
= (0.6485)( ) [1 – ](100)
0.627 1−0.627
Effectiveness = 56.32 %

This study source was downloaded by 100000810032966 from CourseHero.com on 04-05-2022 21:33:15 GMT -05:00
craledesma

https://www.coursehero.com/file/88251110/SCREENING-FINALpdf/
5

10. Limestone is crushed by six units operating parallel and the Mesh Feed Size Oversize Product Undersize
products separated by six 35-mesh screens also in parallel, into 10/14 to 0.2821 0.5855 0.3385 0.00453
two fractions. The effective dimensions of each screen is 6’ by 28/35
20’. The common undersize from the screen comes out at the 35/48 0.2580 0.3370 0.3220 0.00360
total rate of 50 short tons/hr. Assume no losses. 48/65 0.2810 0.0660 0.5260 0.34400
65/100 0.0910 0.0050 0.0670 0.29900
Mesh Feed Size Oversize Undersize 100/150 to 0.0870 0.0060 0.0260 0.35300
6/8 0.075 0.080 0.020 150/200
8/10 0.125 0.145 0.055
10/20 0.100 0.170 0.090 Solution:
20/28 0.125 0.150 0.085
From the analysis: xF = 0.281 ; xR = 0.066 ; xU = 0.344 ; xP = 0.526
28/35 0.125 0.280 0.10
35/48 0.175 0.175 0.150 Since R:P:U = 4:3:2 → P = 3/4 R = 0.75R ; U = 2/4 R = 0.5R
48/65 0.225 - 0.150 OMB: F=R+U+P
65/100 0.050 - 0.250 1500 = R + 0.5R + 0.75R
100/150 - - 0.100 R = 666.67 lbs/h
P = 0.75R = 0.75(666.67) = 500 lbs/h
Calculate the following:
P 500
a) The efficiency of screening operation = 1500 = = 0.333
F
b) The capacity of each screen in lb/24 hour per sq. ft.
Solution: PxP P(1−xP )
Effectiveness = (
FxF
) [1 – F(1−xF )
](100)
For 35-mesh below: 0.526 0.333(1−0.526)
= (0.333)( ) [1 – ](100)
0.281 1−0.281
Mesh Feed Size Oversize Undersize
Effectiveness = 48.6 %
35/48 0.175 0.175 0.150
48/65 0.225 - 0.150 12. Analysis of crushed dolomite sample is depicted on the table
65/100 0.050 - 0.250 including the analysis of oversize and undersize portions from
100/150 - - 0.100 screening with Mesh 20.
Sum 0.45 0.175 0.65
Mesh Feed Undersize Oversize
10 0.32 0 0.19
P x −x 0.45−0.175
= xF −xR = 0.65−0.175 = 0.579 12 0.11 0 0.17
F P R
14 0.05 0 0.13
a) Effectiveness of the screening operation 16 0.13 0.1 0.11
PxP P(1−xP ) 20 0.05 0.05 0.26
Effectiveness = ( ) [1 – ](100)
FxF F(1−xF ) 28 0.15 0.15 0.03
0.65 0.579(1−0.65) 32 0.05 0.2 0.11
= (0.579)( ) [1 – ](100)
0.45 1−0.45 35 0.05 0.3 0
Effectiveness = 52.82 %
60 0.08 0.2 0
b) Capacity of each screen
Calculate the % recovery, % rejection of the desired material
Area of each screen = (6 ft)(20 ft) = 120 ft 2 which is the oversize.
For each screen: P = 50/6 = 8.333 short tons/h Solution:
8.883 short tons/h 2 000 lbs
F= (1 short ton) = 28 784 lb/h Mesh Feed Undersize Oversize
0.579
10 0.32 0 0.19
F
Capacity of each screen = 12 0.11 0 0.17
At
28 784 lb/h
14 0.05 0 0.13
= (24 h) 16 0.13 0.1 0.11
(120 ft2 )
Capacity of each screen = 5757 lbs/𝐟𝐭 𝟐 20 0.05 0.05 0.26
Sum 0.66 0.15 0.86
11. Fine silica is fed at 1500 lbs/h to a double deck vibrating screen
R x −x 0.66−0.15
combination to obtain a 48/65 mesh (Tyler) product. The silica = x F −xU = 0.86−0.15 = 0.718
F R U
feed is introduced into the upper screen of the 48 mesh and the
product is discharged off the surface of the lower screen of 65 RxR 0.718(0.86)
% Recovery = x100 = x 100 = 93.6 %
mesh. During the screening operation, the ratio of oversize to FxF 0.66
R(1−xR ) 0.718(1−0.86)
product to undersize is 4:3:2. Calculate the effectiveness of the % Rejection = [1 − ] x100 = [1 − ] x 100 = 70.4%
F(1−xF ) 1−0.66
screening equipment. Laboratory analysis of the different
fractions:

This study source was downloaded by 100000810032966 from CourseHero.com on 04-05-2022 21:33:15 GMT -05:00
craledesma

https://www.coursehero.com/file/88251110/SCREENING-FINALpdf/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

You might also like