TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNDISPUTED FACTS ........................................................................................................................................................ 2
ANNEXURE 1: REMAND FOR JUDICIAL CUSTODY............................................................................................ 4
ANNEXURE 2: SUMMONS TO THE ACCUSED PERSONS ................................................................................... 6
ANNEXURE 3: SUMMONS TO THE WITNESSES .................................................................................................. 7
ANNEXURE 4: COMMITAL ORDER ...................................................................................................................... 11
ANNEXURE 5: FIRST INFORMATION REPORT ................................................................................................. 12
ANNEXURE 6: INQUEST REPORT......................................................................................................................... 14
ANNEXURE 7: FINAL REPORT/CHARGESHEET............................................................................................... 16
ANNEXURE 8: PROPERTY SEIZURE MEMO...................................................................................................... 19
ANNEXURE 9: SCENE OF OFFENCES: PANCHNAMA ..................................................................................... 22
ANNEXURE 10: POSTMORTEM REPORT ........................................................................................................... 23
ANNEXURE 11: FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY REPORT .................................................................... 24
ANNEXURE 12: TOXICOLOGY REPORT ............................................................................................................ 26
ANNEXURE 13: PROSECUTION WITNESS STATEMENTS ............................................................................. 28
ANNEXURE 14: DEFENCE WITNESS STATEMENTS AIDE MEMOIRE ...................................................... 30
UNDISPUTED FACTS
1. In the republic of Sindia, there exist a miraculous city where all the babies are born as twins
(either identical or unidentical). It is nowhere but the city of Mayavaram in the State of
Dolakpur. Anamika and Sinamika are unidentical twin sisters who were born on 1st December,
2007 in Mayavaram. Both of them underwent cricket coaching from their childhood. The elder
sister, Anamika was a child prodigy who played as an all-rounder (right arm batter & right
arm off spin) whereas the younger sister struggled in her early days but managed to perform
well as a left-arm fast bowler.
2. Both of them excelled in their respective roles and were called up for the National U-19 World
Cup training camp which was conducted at the National Sports Academy located in Dolakpur.
The camp was conducted in order to shortlist 20 players out of the 30 players called up for
training. The Camp was scheduled from 01/02/2025 to 29/02/2025. The players were coached
by renowned cricketer Mr. Satish. The director of the facility was Mr. Rahul David.
3. The players were provided accommodation in such a way that 2 players share a single room.
Both Anamika and Sinamika were allotted Room No. 207 in residential block. Anamika had
a habit of writing journal. The entire facility was completely secure with multiple CCTV
surveillance. Though they were sister, they had numerous disagreements and quarrels. They
were even seen having heated arguments at times.
4. Osma Jasmine and Goperundevi were fellow cricketers who stayed in the adjoining Room No.
208 and Room No. 210 respectively. On 16/02/2025, Anamika was facing Sinamika in the net
session and got injured in when she was hit on her left shoulder. She was taken to medical
assistance and was prescribed pain killer tablets to be taken for 5 days.
5. The management had organised a team dinner and relaxation session on 17/02/2025 at around
08:00 PM. Everyone attended the same and participated in many fun activities till 10:30 PM.
As Anamika was under medication, she felt drained out and was escorted to her room by her
sister around the same time.
6. Later, Goperundevi visited their room to check on Anamika and left the room at around 10:45.
She went back to her room, but around 11:00, She saw the coach coming out of Anamika’s
Room to the corridor.
7. The next morning when Goperundevi went to Room No.207 to check on Anamika at around
6:20, she found Anamika dead in her bed. She immediately informed the management and the
police about the same. At, 06:40 AM, First Information Report was recorded based on the oral
complaint given by Goperundevi accusing Sinamika and Mr. Satish for the murder of Anamika
under Section 103 r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The police arrived at the crime
spot at around 07:00 AM and sealed the spot.
8. The police sent the body for post mortem at 07:15 AM nearby government hospital and
proceeded with their investigation by recording the statements of the witnesses, drafting
inquest report, scene of offence panchnama, property seizure memo, perusing CCTV footages
of the facility.
ANNEXURE 1: REMAND FOR JUDICIAL CUSTODY
IN THE COURT OF THE 4th ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
DHOLAKPUR CITY
C. C. No. 420/2025
In the matter between,
The State of Dholakpur ......................................................................................... Prosecution
v/s
Sinamika and Anr..................................................................................................Defence
COMPLAINANT: Gopuerundevi
ACCUSED NO. 1:
Name: Sinamika
Age: 18
Address: Haven of No.5, Majestic Apartments, Walajah Road, Kasukabe, Dolakpur – 536 854
ACCUSED NO. 2:
Name: Satish Powar
Age: 35
Address: Haven of No.5, Aishwaryam Residency, Market Street, Mayavaram, Dolakpur – 532 996
ALLEGED OFFENCES ARE U/S. 103R/W 3(5), 238 AND 60 OF B.N.S.
DATE: 21/02/2025
TIME: 06:00 PM
ORDER
In furtherance of the case, who are Accused 1 and Accused 2 respectively were presented before
me at 06:00 PM. A remand application has been filed and the documents of arrest intimation,
arrest memo, a copy of the FIR have been submitted.
The Accused 1 and 2 did not plead ill-treatment by police and have submitted that they were
arrested today morning at 10:00 AM. from the National Sports Academy building. They have
submitted that their family members were informed about the arrest by the police and that their
advocate has filed a bail application under Section 480 of BNSS.
The reasons mentioned for the remand application have been considered by this court. As it
appears that the investigation is pending, this court grants the remand for judicial custody of
Accused 1 and 2. Accused 1 and 2 shall be sent to judicial custody till 25/03/2025 under Section
187(2) of BNSS. The Jail Authorities are directed to produce the two accused before the
concerned court on the next date of hearing.
Seal: Deemed to be affixed Signature of the judge:
Sd/-
Date: 21/02/2025 Suraj Kumar
ANNEXURE 2: SUMMONS TO THE ACCUSED PERSONS
IN THE COURT OF THE 4TH ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
DHOLAKPUR CITY
S.C. No. 420/2025
SUMMONS TO ACCUSED PERSONS
(No. 1, Schedule V, Act, V, 1898) (Section 70 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita)
The State of Dholakpur ........................................................................................ Prosecution
v/s
Sinamika and Anr ................................................................................................. Defence
To,
(1) Sinamika
(2) Satish Powar
Wherein your attendance is necessary to answer to a charge under Sections 103r/w 3(5),238 and
60 of BNS, you are hereby required to appear in person by 27th and 28th of April, 2025
before the Principal Session Judge, Dholakpur City, on the 27th and 28th of April, 2025 at ten
o'clock in the forenoon. Herein fail not.
Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this day of 23rd, March, 2025.
Seal: Deemed to be affixed Signature of the judge: -
Date: 23/03/2025 Suraj Kumar
ANNEXURE 3: SUMMONS TO THE WITNESSES
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE
DHOLAKPUR CITY
S.C. No. 420/2025
In the matter between:
C.C.No. 420/2025
The State of Dholakpur........................................................................................... Prosecution
v/s
Mr. Sinamika and Ors..................................................................................................... Defence
To,
1. Mr. Goperundevi
2. Dr. Arjun Reddy
3. Duraisingham
|
ORDER
(Deemed to be proved and taken on record)
In pursuance of the information that has been laid before me that the two accused: (1) Mrs.
Sinamika and (2) Mr. Satish Powar in the present matter, herein referred to as A1 and A2
respectively, have been arrested and taken into custody by the Dholakpur City Police on the 21st
Febraury, 2025 for conspiring and committing the offense of Murder and are punishable under
Section(s) 103 r/w 3(5),238 and 60 of B.N.S., and it appears to me that you are likely to give
material evidence or to produce any document or other thing for the prosecution.
I, Neeraj Kumar, Principal Sessions Judge, Dholakpur City, do hereby order that the re-
examination of the concerned witnesses in the present matter be conducted on the 27th and 28th
of April, 2025at 10 A.M., before this Court and hereby summon the concerned witnesses to
appear for the same and produce such document or thing or testify on the matter of the complaint
before me. A warrant shall be issued to compel your attendance if you neglect or refuse to appear
without just excuse.
Seal: Deemed to be affixed Signature of the Judge:
Date: 23/03/2025 Neeraj Kumar
DENIAL OF GUILT ORDER
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE
DHOLAKPUR CITY
S.C. No. 420/2025
In the matter between:
C.C.No. 420/2025
The State of Dholakpur ........................................................................................ Prosecution
v/s
Sinamika and Anr .................................................................................................. Defence
ORDER
(Deemed to be proved and taken on record)
In pursuance to the Committal Order issued by the learned 2nd Additional Metropolitan
Magistrate dated 23rd March, 2025 and wherefore information has been laid before me and on
the consideration thereof, I have reasons to believe that the accused: (1) Sinamika and (2) Satish
Powar who are Accused 1 (A1) and Accused 2 (A2) respectively are alleged for having
conspired to and committed the offence of Murder of one Mrs. Anamika.
I, Neeraj Kumar, Principal Sessions Judge, Dholakpur do hereby charge the above-mentioned
accused for the offences committed, which are punishable under section(s) Sections 103 r/w 3(5),
238 and 60 of B.N.S., and do hereby direct that you all be tried by this Court for the above said
offence from the date as specified.
The contents of the charges have been read over and explained to both the two accused and the
following questions were asked:
ACCUSED NO.1: Sinamika
Q. Mrs. Sinamika, have you heard and understood the contents of the charges framed against you?
Ans. Yes
Q. Do you plead guilty for the same or claim Trial?
Ans. I plead not guilty and wish to contest in the Trial proceedings.
ACCUSED NO. 2: Mr. Satish Powar
Q. Mr. Satish Powar have you heard and understood the contents of the charges framed against
you?
Ans. Yes
Q. Do you plead guilty for the same or claim Trial?
Ans. I plead not guilty and wish to contest in the Trial proceedings.
The Summons is issued to all the concerned Witnesses and the Trial is scheduled to commence
on 27th and 28th of April, 2025 at 10:00 AM before this Court.
Seal: Deemed to be affixed Signature of the judge:
Date: 23/03/2025 Neeraj Kumar
ANNEXURE 4: COMMITAL ORDER
IN THE COURT OF THE 4th ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE, DHOLAKPUR STATE
S.C. No. 420/2025
In the matter between:
C.C.No. 420/2025
The State of Dholakpur ..................................................................................... Prosecution
v/s
Sinamika and Anr ................................................................................................. Defence
COMMITAL ORDER
(Deemed to be proved and taken on record)
Whereas information has been laid before me and on the consideration thereof, I have
reasons to believe that all the accused: (1) Sinamika and (2) Satish Powar who are Accused
1 (A1) and Accused 2 (A2) respectively, are alleged for having conspired to and committed
the offence of Murder of one Mrs. Anamika on 17th February, 2025 at 11:00 PM.
Since the offences are under Section(s) 103 r/w 3(5),238 and 60 of B.N.S., it is exclusively
triable by the Court of Sessions at Dholakpur. Notice of the Committal Order has been
given to the Public Prosecutor. Copies of the Final Report of the Investigating Officer have
been given to the accused.
Seal: Deemed to be affixed Signature of the Judge:
Date: 23/03/2025 Suraj Kumar
ANNEXURE 5: FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
1. DISTRICT: Mayavaram P.S.: Ananthapuram PS
2. FIR No.: 534/2025 DATE: 18/02/2025
3. (i) ACT(S): Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023 (B.N.S.)
(ii) SECTION(S): 103 r/w 3(5) of B.N.S.
4. OCCURRENCE OF OFFENCE: 11:00 PM – 17/02/2025
5. INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM: Ms. Goperundevi
6. TYPE OF INFORMATION: Oral
7. FILING OF REPORT: 06:40 AM, 18/02/2025
8. PLACE OF OCCURRENCE: National Sports Academy, Mayavaram, Dolakpur.
a) Direction and distance from P.S.: South West; 4.2 km
b) Address: Residential Block, National Sports Academy, Mayavaram – 536 854
c) In case, outside the limit of this Police Station, then:
Name of P.S.: N/A District: N/A
9. DETAILS OF KNOWN/SUSPECTED/UNKNOWN ACCUSED WITH FULL PARTICULARS:
Known accused (a) Ms. Sinamika
(b) Mr. Satish
10. REASONS FOR DELAY IN REPORTING BY COMPLAINANT/INFORMANT: No delay, informed
immediately
11. INQUEST REPORT/ U.D. CASE NO. IF ANY: Attached below
12. FIRST INFORMATION CONTENTS:
My name is Goperundevi and I am a cricketer training at the National Sport Academy. Last
night, we had a team dinner and after that Sinamika escorted Anamika to her room. I
checked on her in her room at 10:40 PM, saw Sinamika giving pills to her sister. Later, I
returned to my room and at around 10:50 PM, I saw the coach coming out of Anamika’s
room.When I went to check on her the next morning, she was found dead.
13. ACTION TAKEN:
An FIR has been registered against Ms. Sinamika and Mr. Satish as suspected accused
persons, investigation is handed over to the investigating officer, Duraisingam, Sr PI,
Ananthapuram, Dolakpur.
F.I.R. read over to the informant, admitted to be correctly recorded and a copy given to
the informant, free of cost.
Signature /Thumb impression of the complainant/ informant: Sd/-
Name: Ms. Goperundevi
Signature of officer in charge: Sd/-
Name: Mr. Ekambaram
Rank: Head Constable
Date and Time of dispatch to the Court: 2 PM, 26/02/2025
ANNEXURE 6: INQUEST REPORT
1. DISTRICT: Mayavaram
2. POLICE STATION: Ananthapuram
3. DATE AND TIME OF RECEIVING INFORMATION ABOUT DEATH: 18/02/2025 at 6:55 AM
4. DETAILS OF WITNESS I:
a. Name: Goperundevi
b. Age: 18
c. Residing at: No. 56/7 green lays road, Kolapour.
5. DETAILS OF WITNESS II:
a. Name: Sadhana Sargam
b. Age: 20
c. Residing at: No. 30/7 Habulla road, Karampuri.
6. DETAILS OF DECEASED:
a. Name: Anamika
b. Age: 18
c. Address: No. 85 Panipuri street, Manyavarm.
7. BY WHOM FIRST FOUND DEAD: Goperundevi, friend of the deceased.
8. TIME AND PLACE WHERE THE BODY WAS FOUND: 6:20AM
9. LAST PERSON TO SEE THE DECEASED ALIVE: Sinamika
10. TIME AND PLACE WHERE PERSON WAS LAST SEEN ALIVE: 10:50PM at Room No. 207
11. DEAD BODY IDENTIFIED BY: Goperundevi
12. MARKS OF IDENTIFICATION, IF ANY: none
13. HEIGHT AND WEIGHT OF THE DECEASED: 167cm 58kg
14. RELATIVES PRESENT AT INQUEST: Sinamika, the sister of the deceased.
15. SPOT WHERE CORPSE WAS FOUND: Bed Room no. 207
16. STATUS OF BODY WHEN FOUND: The deceased was lying on the bed.
17. INJURIES AND MARKS ON BODY: none
18. NATURE OF WOUNDS: none
19. CONDITIONS OF CLOTHES/ORNAMENTS: the deceased was wearing a night suit.
20. MARKS OF VIOLENCE OF STRUGGLE: none
21. APPARENT CAUSE OF DEATH: over dosage of drugs
22. PRESENT STATUS OF THE BODY: at the government hospital mortuary.
Witness 1 – Rashmika Sd/- Name of the I.O: Duraisingam
Witness 2 – Sivaghami Sd/- Rank: Sr. P.I.
ANNEXURE 7: FINAL REPORT/CHARGESHEET
(Under Section 193 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita)
1. DETAILS
a. District: Mayavaram
b. P.S: Ananthapuram
c. Year: 2025
d. FIR No: 534/2025
2. CHARGE SHEET NO./ FINAL REPORT NO.: 657/2025
3. DATE OF FILING REPORT: 20/03/2025
4. ACT(S): Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (B.N.S.)
5. SECTION(S): 238, 103 r/w 3(5) of B.N.S.
6. IF SUPPLEMENTARY OR ORIGINAL: Original
7. NAME OF THE I.O: Duraisingam
Rank: Sr. P.I.
No: 367/Ananthapuram
8. NAME OF THE COMPLAINANT/INFORMANT: Goperundevi
9. PARTICULARS OF ACCUSED PERSONS CHARGE-SHEETED:
ACCUSED NO. 1
a. Name: Sinamika Whether verified: Yes
b. Father’s Name: Mark Antony
c. Age: 18 D.O.B.: 01/12/2007
d. Sex: Female
e. Blood Group: O-ve
f. Nationality: Sindian
g. Religion: N/A
h. Address: No.5, Majestic Apartments, Walajah Road, Kasukabe, Dolakpur – 536 854
i. Provisional Crime No: 348/2025
j. Regular Crime No: N/A
k. Date of Apprehension: 10:00 AM; 21/02/2025
l. Date on which forwarded to the Court: 21/03/2025
m. Under Acts and Section: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 – Section 103 r/w 3(5)
n. Status of the accused: Judicial Custody.
ACCUSED NO. 2
a. Name: Mr. Satish Whether verified: Yes
b. Father’s Name: Edison Kanagaraj
c. Age: 35 D.O.B.: 22/11/1989
d. Sex: Male
e. Blood Group: AB-ve
f. Nationality: Sindian
g. Religion: N/A
h. Address: No.5, Aishwaryam Residency, Market Street, Mayavaram, Dolakpur – 532
996
i. Provisional Crime No: 348/2025
j. Regular Crime No: N/A
k. Date of Apprehension: 10:00 AM; 21/02/2025
l. Date on which forwarded to the Court: 21/03/2025
m. Under Acts and Section: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita – Section 238, 103 r/w 3(5)
n. Status of the accused: Judicial Custody.
10. BRIEF COURSE OF INVESTIGATION:
On 18th February, 2025, the station received news about the death of Anamika at the
National Sports Academy. After receiving a complaint from her colleague Goperundevi,
I reached the crime spot with 5 constables at around 07:00 AM following the FIR which
was lodged around 07:00 AM of the same day.
When I reached the spot, I saw Anamika dead lying on her bed with stirpes of pain
killer tablets on her table. The body was sent to the nearby government hospital for
autopsy. Then, a spot of offence panchnama was conducted at around 7.30 AM. The
entire place was sealed and necessary pictures were taken. The items seized were
syringes, a bouquet of roses, half-emptied pain killer tablet bottle, personal diary, a glass
bottle and wallet of the deceased. These evidences were sent for further examination.
Then, witness statements were collected from suitable witnesses. It was followed by
the examination of the CCTV footage of the training facility, from which we affirmed
the presence of the accused at the scene of crime along with the victim. We also found
that the coach, Mr. Satish made an attempt to destroy the CCTV footage of the academy
training facility.
After conducting a thorough investigation and referring to the Witness Statements,
Post-Mortem Report, Toxicology Report and Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL)
Reports, it could be concluded that both the accused in the judicial custody has played
a part in the murder of the deceased.
11. LIST OF PROSECUTION WITNESSES:
a. Ms. Goperundevi
b. Mr. Duraisingam
c. Dr. Arjun Reddy
Forwarded by the Station House Officer/ Officer in Charge: Ekambaram
Rank: Head Constable
Signature of the Officer-in-Charge: Sd/-
Name of the I.O: Duraisingam
Rank: Sr. P.I.
Signature of the I.O. submitting the Final Report/Chargesheet: Sd/-
ANNEXURE 8: PROPERTY SEIZURE MEMO
1. DISTRICT: Mayavaram P.S: Ananthapuram PS
2. FIR No: 534/2025 DATE: 18/02/2025
Act(s) and section(s): (a) Act(s): Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S)
(b) Section(s): 103 r/w 3(5) of B.N.S
3. PROPERTY SEIZED/RECOVERED/DISCOVERED AT: National Sports Academy, Mayavaram,
Dholakpur.
a. Date: 18/02/2025
b. Time: 7:30AM
c. Address of the place from where seized/recovered/discovered: Residential block,
National sports Academy, Mayavaram – 536 854
4. WITNESS:
i. Name: Goperundevi
Age: 18
Residing at: No.
ii. Name: Meenakshi
Age: 24
Residing at: Rampur Nagar, Hyatti.
5. ACTION TAKEN/RECOMMENDED FOR DISPOSAL FOR PERISHABLE PROPERTY: NIL
6. ACTION TAKEN/RECOMMENDED FOR DISPOSAL FOR KEEPING OF VALUABLE PROPERTY:
Packed, sealed and sent to safe custody for further examination.
7. IDENTIFICATION REQUIRED: Yes
8. DETAILS OF PROPERTIES SEIZED/RECOVERED:
Sl. No. Property description I.O. Marking
1. Bouquet 1A/534/2025
2. Syringe 1B/534/2025
3. Tablet 1C/534/2025
4. Note 1D/534/2025
5. Packet of Powder 1E/534/2025
1A/534/2025
1B/534/2025
1C/534/2025
1D/534/2025
1E/534/2025
Witness 1: Goperundevi Name of the I.O.: Duraisingam
Witness 2: Meenakshi Rank: Sr. P.I.
Signature of the I.O.
ANNEXURE 9: SCENE OF OFFENCES: PANCHNAMA
DATE: 18.02.2025
PANCHA NO: 1
NAME: Aoran
AGE: 30 Years
RESIDING AT: No. 296 New Bangaru Naidu Colony, KK Nagar, Mayavaram 609001
PANCHA NO: 2
NAME: Chitra Kailash
AGE: 34 Years
RESIDING AT: No 22/75 Kutchery Road Mayavaram 609001
We the above mentioned panchas were called by Duraisingam the investigation officer, to act
as panchas in the present case on 18th February, 2025 at about 7.30 AM
The investigation team, donned in gloves and masks, entered the premises with caution.
They collect the following items as evidence a syringe, located near the deceased, labelled as
1A|534|2025, a bouquet of flowers, positioned on the table, labelled as 1B|534|2025, a dairy
open to the last entry on 16.02.2025 labelled as 1C|534|2025, Pills discovered in a black
container besides a glass of water, labelled as 1D|534|2025, a white susbstance, was found
inside a table drawer on the other side of the room, labelled as 1E|534|2025, No other items
or properties were seized by the police in our presence.
The panchnama was concluded in an orderly manner, with the contents beings read out to us
and accurately recorded.
Pancha No 1: Kana Sd/- Name of I.O: Duraisingam Sd/-
Pancha No 2: Jithin Sd/- Rank: I.O – Sr. P.I.
ANNEXURE 10: POSTMORTEM REPORT
NAME OF THE INSTITUTION: Artemis Hospital.
NAME OF DOCTOR CONDUCTING AUTOPSY: Dr. Arjun Deshmukh
POSTMORTEM REPORT NO.: 517/ 2025
DATE AND TIME OF RECEIPT OF BODY: 18th February 2025, 7:30 PM
DATE AND HOUR OF STARTING AUTOPSY: 18th February 2025, 8 PM
DATE AND HOUR OF CONCLUDING AUTOPSY: 18th February 2025, 9:30 PM
TIME OF DEATH: Around 1 am to 3 am, 17th February 2025
CASE PARTICULARS:
Name of the deceased: Anamika
Age: 18 Sex: Female Blood Group: O +ve
Body identified by: Sister and Campmates of the deceased.
OBSERVATIONS:
Height: 5’4 ft Weight: 57 kgs Rigor Mortis: Present.
EXTERNAL EXAMINATION:
1. Contusions around neck
2. Lacerations on the back
3. Swelling on the neck
4. Conjunctiva of the eyes
INTERNAL EXAMINATION:
1. Signs of edema in the lungs
2. Swelling in the liver
3. Haemorrage within several strap muscles of the neck
OPINION:
The deceased shows signs of death by overdosing on medication, requires toxicology report
for precise determination of medicines, might have been sleeping pills. Injuries on neck are
from playing sport, depicts being hit by a ball.
Sd/- Received by I.O
Dr. Arjun Reddy, Sd/- Mr. Duraisingam
Senior Pathologist, Ananthapuram PS,
Artemis Hospitals. 19th February, 2025.
ANNEXURE 11: FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY REPORT
State Forensic Laboratory Report
Government of Dolakpur
Reg: BAL(IB)/708/2008 Date: 3/03/2025
From,
Arnold,
The Director and Chief Examiner, Division
State Forensic Science Laboratory,
Dolakpur
To,
Investigating Officer
Mr. Duraisingam
ACP, Mayavaram Police Station
Dolakpur, Sindia
CERTIFICATE OF EXAMINATION
The articles sent in were received by the State Forensic Science Laboratory, for examination
on 28th February, 2025.The articles were received and sealed in a manner that corresponds to
the materials as were informed to be received, all of which is summarized in the forensic
report.
MATERIALS EXAMINED
Materials Examined Markings
Syringe S1
Vial of Medicine V1
Fingerprint recovered from S1 F1
Fingerprint recovered from V1 F2
Finger print sample of Ms. Anamika FA 1
Finger print sample of Ms. Sinamika FA 2
Finger print sample from Mr. FA 3
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
The observation and tests conducted were through methods of collecting samples found at the
scene of offence.
1. Latent Fingerprints were lifted by Cyanoacrylate vapour after which the fingerprints
were moved from the surfaces to a notecard by the means of a lifting tape.
2. The State Forensics Science Laboratory used the standard methodology, i.e, to
conduct friction ridge examinations, the ACE-V test.
3. The Fingerprints database was utilised by the State Laboratory to analyse the matter at
hand.
RESULT OF THE ANALYSIS:
The result of the analysis conducted on the aforementioned material produced at the scene of
offence or incidents are furnished below:
The finger print marked as F1 and F 2 match with the fingerprint collected and marked as
FA 2.
Sd/-
Arnold
Chief Examiner
ANNEXURE 12: TOXICOLOGY REPORT
REPORT ISSUED: 3rd March 2025
PATIENT NAME: Ms. Anamika
PATIENT ID: 2025 -200591
AGE: 18 years
DOB: 1/12/2007
GENDER: Female
CASE SUMMARY:
Ms. Anamika, 18 years old female was a cricketer player, whose sample was sent for testing to
check for drug intake. The present report was brought about to confirm on the presence of a
few drugs in the body.
POSITIVE FINDINGS:
Compound Result Units
Diuretic- Thiazide 30 mg
Secobarbital 3 g
SPECIMENS RECEIVED:
ID Tube/ Container Collection Date/ Time Matrix Source
001 Grey top test tube 26/02/2025 Blood
002 Yellow top test tube 26/02/2025 Urine
REFERENCE COMMENTS:
Diuretic is the category of substance that increases sodium re-absorption in the body which
facilitates increased loss of water from the body. In extended and severe cases, it causes
dizziness, severe dehydration and in extreme cases even be fatal. It is also recommended for
maintaining blood pressure levels.
Secobarbital is a common anti-depressant and acts as a sleeping pill. It was found in lethal dose
in the body.
TOXICOLOGY ANALYSIS:
To assess the working of the diuretic, Thaizide and the Anti-depressant, Seconal, a toxicological
analysis was performed wherein:
1. Diruetic, Thiazide was found in normal levels in the body, in correlation to the amount
of drug intake.
2. Seconal was found in lethal dose in the body.
Sd/-
Dr. Anthony
Kumar Laboratory
Director
ANNEXURE 13: PROSECUTION WITNESS STATEMENTS
PW1: Goperundevi
I am Goperundevi and I am a cricketer currently undergoing training camp at the National
Sports Academy for almost 3 weeks. We started our camp on 1st Febraury and many players
from various parts of the country have been called up for this very camp. We were informed
that only 20 out of all the players will be shortlisted for the U-19 World Cup Squad. We were
coached by Mr. Satish.
It was only then I met the twin sisters, Anamika and Sinamika. We trained together during the
practice session and even spend time after that too. After days of observing their game, I was
astonished to see the raw talent of Anamika. She was undoubtedly the best player of our batch.
We usually have a bet among the bowlers to get her out in the net session but it seemed almost
impossible. There were even talks that she had the best chance to lead the National side in the
upcoming World Cup. On the other hand, her sister, Sinamika is a mediocre player who often
felt envious about her sister’s talent.
As the days passed, we became so close and spent a lot of time together both on and off the
field. Sinamika’s worry and envy also grew every day. Around the end of second week of the
camp, Sinamika’s performance rose out of the blue. Suddenly her game seemed a bit artificial
and she felt like a completely different player. She also started seeing the coach more often.
Usually, we practice have 2 sessions of practice a day, in morning and evening. But around this
time of the camp, the coach made few players to stay late during the evening session. Both the
sisters were in the special session. Change in their behaviour was evident at this point of time.
They spent less time with others and are often found in their room. Anamika seemed gloom.
Day before yesterday, during our practice session, Anamika was hit in her left shoulder by a
beamer bowled by her sister. She was in a lot of pain and was immediately taken to the medic.
They prescribed her some medicine and asked her to rest. After that, I saw her only during the
dinner we had the next day. She was reserved all along the dinner and was visibly tired at the
end of it around 10:30 PM. Sinamika accompanied Anamika to her room. I went to their room
to ensure whether she was alright. When I entered her room at around 10:40, I saw Sinamika
giving some pills to her sister. I stayed there for a while and had a small chat about her recovery.
Then, I left to my room. At around 10:50 PM, I saw the coach coming out of Anamika’s Room
to the corridor and gave a thought about it and went back to sleep in my room. I was deeply
concerned for Anamika. So, I went to her room to check on her as the first thing the next day.
But, to my shock, she was found lying breathless in her room. I immediately informed the
management and the police station about the same.
PW2: Dr. Arjun Reddy
I am Dr. Arjun Reddy, Senior Pathologist at Artemis Hospital. I conducted the Post Mortem on
the deceased. The time of receipt of body was around 7:30 pm on 18th of February. I proceeded
with the autopsy and noted that there was an external injury on the victim’s neck with common
symptoms of the same. This has caused swelling in the internal artery which might have led to
dizziness. Looking at the swelling of the internal organs such as the liver and the liquid deposit
in the lungs it indicates towards possible death by overdose of drugs, most probably a sleeping
pill of some sort.
PW3: Dr. Anthony
I am Dr. Anthony working at Kumar Laboratory. I carried out the toxicology analysis for the
present case. There were diuretics found in the deceased body, however this was the normal
amount in accordance with consumption of drugs. There was an unusually high amount of
Seconal (Secobarbital) which is either used for inducing sleep or as an anti-depressant.
Anything above 2000mg of Seconal can become lethal and in the sample given, there was more
than that, indicating death due to overdose of the same.
ANNEXURE 14: DEFENCE WITNESS STATEMENTS AIDE MEMOIRE
Mr. Rahul Dravid (DW1)
Age: 50 years
Occupation: Head of Sports Federation
I am the Director of the National U-19 World Cup Training Camp in Dolakpur. We selected 30
Under-19 female players all around the Country, from which the best 20 were chosen for the
training camp. The players are coached by one of the renowned former cricketers, Mr. Satish.
The Coach and I adhered to the rules and regulations strictly, and strongly instructed the players
to do as well. We personally made sure we keep a routine check on the rooms of the players to
prevent any accidental or direct cases of doping. We were about to start the 2 nd round of
selections. We were utterly shocked on the drugs being found.
Mr. Satish is one of the best Coaches and a glorified former cricketer of our Nation. He has a
stellar reputation, having handled many batches of young players. He has shaped them to
achieve great heights. During one of our meetings, he had vouched for two players Ms.
Anamika and Ms. Sinamika. He said that both of them were one of the bests he had come across
in decades of his time in this field. He found Ms. Anamika to be very dedicated and sincere
and had very high hopes on her.
However, this incident comes to my mind when Coach and I were discussing that lately Ms.
Anamika was off her game. The coach was very upset and worried for her. She was not
concentrating properly and he was unable to find the source of the problem. The selections
were nearing and he wanted her to be in her best form for the game.
I don’t know why it is being said that he murdered Ms. Anamika, when she was the best student
he has ever had and wanted to make her reach great heights in the profession. Infact, she was
the upcoming player and he put his blood, sweat and tears in training her. As far as I know, he
was just very concerned about her health and well being. He was visibly disturbed and shattered
at her demise. We all are.
Ms. Osma Jasmin (DW2)
Age: 18 years
Occupation: Under-19 Cricketer
I am a trainee in the National U-19 World Cup Training Camp. I was good friends with both of
them. I stay in the adjoining room to the twins. One day during a small dinner session in the
training centre, Anamika was taken back to her room by Goperundevi and Sinamika as she was
complaining of feeling sick.
Sinamika came to my room that night and she looked very sad. We immediately went to the
common area of the building to talk. She told me that Anamika looked depressed, did not talk
to her properly and had suicidal thoughts. She said that it was very difficult for her to handle,
being her twin, she could feel the pain. I felt very bad seeing Sinamika in such a state. She was
crying the whole night. Sinamika and Anamika were extremely close. In addition to being
twins, Sinamika considered Anamika to be her best friend.
I too noticed Anamika being closed off. She wasn’t her usual cheery self. She did not talk much
to me or anyone. I noticed that she was off her game. The twins were one of the bests in the
centre, but suddenly it seemed as if Anamika lost her form. I could also sense the impact her
behaviour made on Sinamika’s game. Both the sisters, suddenly were off their usual form.
I was trying to console Sinamika and she stayed with me in my room that night. The morning
we both woke up to the news that Anamika passed away. We rushed to their room. I have never
seen Sinamika that shattered. Anamika had a bright future ahead of her.
It is very sad and distasteful to think that Sinamika is being accused for her sister’s death, when
Sinamika loved Anamika above all else, to an extent that anything that affected Anamika also
affected Sinamika.
