0% found this document useful (0 votes)
0 views

Diode Questions (1)

The document discusses various concepts in electrostatics, including potential profiles, space charge, depletion due to sheet charge, and reverse leakage current in p-n junctions. It also compares ideal and non-ideal Schottky junctions, addressing Fermi level pinning and current components in forward bias. Key equations and principles related to semiconductor physics are presented throughout the text.

Uploaded by

jayeshjsrv
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
0 views

Diode Questions (1)

The document discusses various concepts in electrostatics, including potential profiles, space charge, depletion due to sheet charge, and reverse leakage current in p-n junctions. It also compares ideal and non-ideal Schottky junctions, addressing Fermi level pinning and current components in forward bias. Key equations and principles related to semiconductor physics are presented throughout the text.

Uploaded by

jayeshjsrv
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Electrostatics

The potential profile across a device is shown above. The total space
charge inside the device is:

(a) Negative
 2 E 
 2    q  p  n  N d  N a 
x x 
(b) Zero R
  x
 E L  
R
dx

(c) Positive L

(d) No idea
Depletion due to a Sheet Charge

If the sheet charge density is -Q, the zero-bias


depletion width is given by:
a. There is no depletion
2  k BT  N D  
b. W   ln  
qN D  q  ni  
Q
c. W 
2 qN D
Q
d. W  What is the barrier-height/well-width?
qN D
X 2 ρ X 2
Depletion due to a Sheet Charge

Q  qN D X  X  Q qN D x

Em   qN D X 2

D  E  2 Em  qN a X  Q Whence? x

1  X qN D X 2 Q2
qVb  Em   
2 2 8 8 qN D x
Reverse Leakage Current – Charge Control Analysis

Consider a wide p-n junction. The approximate flux


of minority electrons that diffuse from the bulk of
the p-side to the depletion region per unit time is:

Dn ni2 Qn qn ni2 qa2 ni2 qDn ni2


a. J n  xP     
n N a n  n N a  n n N a n N a
2
Dn ni
b.
Wp N a
c. 𝑊 𝑛
, 𝑊 ≫𝜆
𝜏 𝑁
d. None of the above/no idea
Reverse Leakage Current – Charge Control Analysis

p n p n

Electrons Holes Electrons Holes


 x  xN   p
p N  x   p N 0  p N 0 (e
qV f kBT
 1)e qn qDn ni2
Jn  nP 0 
 p N  x   p N 0 (e
qV f kBT
 1)e
  x  xN   p n n N a

q   pN dx
Qp q p
J p  xN    pN  xN 
xN
 
p p p
q p pN 0
J p  xN  
p
e qV f kBT
1 
Ideal vs. Non-ideal Reverse Characteristics

Between Si (EG = 1.1 eV) and Ge (EG = 0.7 eV) which


one is expected to show characteristic (1) and which
one (4)?  vth N t  np  ni2 
Et  Ei  U 
n  p  2ni
2
Dn n i
n N a
Diode Reverse Leakage vs. Ohmic

Ohmic Diode Reverse Leakage


Quasi Fermi Levels in Forward Bias

dFn dFn Jn
J n  n n  
dx dx nn
n  e  x n  J n  e x n
dFn
  constant
dx
Quasi Fermi Levels in Depletion Region

dFn
J n  n n
dx
dFn Jn
 
dx n n
Current components in Forward Bias

J
? Jp ?

Jn

p 1 
    J p   G p  Rp 
t e

n 1 
   J n   Gn  Rn 
t e

 
Steady-state:  J  0
Current components in Forward Bias

p
Jp

n Jn

The majority current close to the junction is:


a. Dominated by diffusion

b. Dominated by drift

c. A mix of drift and diffusion

d. This cannot be determined analytically


Ideal Schottky Junction

Consider an ideal metal-semiconductor junction.


 s  4.8eV E g  1eV  s  4eV  m  4.3eV
Draw the band diagrams: in equilibrium, small ± bias.
EC
EC
EC

EF EV
EV
B EV
Non-ideal Schottky Junction – Fermi Level Pinning

Consider M-S junction, with Fermi-level pinning (no


modulation of potential with workfunction) at VB.
 s  4.8eV E g  1eV  s  4eV  m  4.3eV

Draw the band diagram in equilibrium. How is the band-


bending related to the initial difference in Fermi levels?

EC

EF
EV
Non-ideal Schottky Junction – Fermi Level Pinning

Effective
EC

CL=εL/tL CR=εR/tR
EF
+
EV +
+

+ +
-Q Q.CL/(CL+CR) + Q.CR/(CL+CR)
EC -Q
EC

EF
EF
EV
EV

‘Actual’ Ideal
VBR vs. doping

You might also like