0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views32 pages

7.2 (LIVE) Screening

The document outlines a biostatistics course focusing on screening tests for diabetes and hydatid cysts, including calculations for prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. It presents two case studies with different screening thresholds and their respective outcomes, highlighting the effectiveness of the tests. The results indicate that both tests for hydatid cysts are of no screening value due to low sensitivity.

Uploaded by

sergekouassi065
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views32 pages

7.2 (LIVE) Screening

The document outlines a biostatistics course focusing on screening tests for diabetes and hydatid cysts, including calculations for prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. It presents two case studies with different screening thresholds and their respective outcomes, highlighting the effectiveness of the tests. The results indicate that both tests for hydatid cysts are of no screening value due to low sensitivity.

Uploaded by

sergekouassi065
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 32

Screening SGL

Biostatistics Course 2021-2022 / Block 7

Ali Lateef Jasim


MBChB.
Question 1.

The prevalence of undetected diabetes in a population


to be screened is approximately 1.5% and it is assumed
that 10000 persons will be screened. The screening test
will measure blood serum sugar content. A value of 180
mg or higher is considered positive. The sensitivity and
specificity associated with this screening are 22.9% and
99.8%, respectively.
Question 1.

A- Set up a four fold table with appropriate numbers in


each cell of the table.
B- Calculate the following values:
1. The percentage of false positives.
2. The percentage of false negatives.
3. The predictive value of positive test.
4. The predictive value of negative test.
Total Blood Serum Sugar test

Negative Positive

C
A

V1
Yes
Diabetics

V2
No

H1

GT
H2
Total
Question 1. Answer

I. To calculate the total number of diabetics among the


sample we should multiply the prevalence of DM by the
grand total (Sample size).

Total No. of affected = Prevalence X Grand total


= 0.015 X 10000
= 150
Question 1. Answer

II. To calculate the number of disease and test positive


(diabetics and test positives) from the total affected we
use the equation of the sensitivity.
Sensitivity = Disease & test +ve (A) / Total affected
0.229 = A / 150
A = 150 X 0.229
= 34
Question 1. Answer

III. To calculate the number of disease positive and test


negative (False negative) from the total affected we
subtract the no. of the affected and test -ve from the
total affected.
C = V1 – A
= 150 – 34
= 116
Question 1. Answer

IV. To calculate the total number of the non-affected we


subtract the No. of affected from grand total
V2 = GT – V1
= 10000 – 150
= 9850
Question 1. Answer

V. To calculate the number of the non-affected and test


negative (D) we use the equation of the specificity.
Specificity = Disease & test -ve (D) / Total not affected
0.998 = D / 9850
D = 9850 X 0.998
= 9830
Question 1. Answer

VI. To calculate the number of disease negative and test


positive (False positive) from the total affected we
subtract the no. of the non-affected and test +ve from the
total affected.
B = V2 – D
= 9850 – 9830
= 20
Question 1. A. Answer
Diabetics Total
Blood Serum Sugar test

Yes No
Negative Positive

34 20 54

116 9830 9946


Total

150 9850 10000


Question 1. B. Answer
I. The percentage of false positives:

N who test positive (B)


Either, FP =
All without disease (V2)

OR FP = 1 – specificity

20
FP = = 0.2%
9850

OR FP = 1 – 0.998 = 0.002 = 0.2%


Question 1. B. Answer
II. The percentage of false negatives:

N who test negative (C)


Either, FN =
All with the disease (V1)

OR FN = 1 – sensitivity

116
FN = = 77.3%
150

OR FN = 1 – 0.229 = 0.771 = 77.1%


Question 1. B. Answer
III. The predictive value of positive test:

People with disease and test +ve


Either, PPV =
All people with a positive test

34
FP = = 0.629 = 62.9%
54
Question 1. B. Answer
IV. The predictive value of negative test :

People without disease and test -ve


Either, NPV =
All people with a negative test

9830
FP = = 0.988 = 98.8%
9946
Question 2.
To observe the effect of increasing sensitivity, assume a
blood sugar screening level 130 mg, with a sensitivity of
44% and specificity 99.0%. Calculate the following values
when the number of persons screening is 10000 and the
prevalence of undetected diabetes is 1.5%:
A. Calculate the percentage
I. False positive
II. False negative
III. Positive predictive value
IV. Negative predictive value
B. How many false positives and false negatives will occur if
100000 persons are screened?
Questions 2.
Disease Total
Present Absent
Absent Present
Exposure

A B H1

C D H2
Total

V1 V2 GT
Question 2. Answer
Using the same method as question 1 to create the 2x2
table:
1. Total No. of affected = Prevalence X Grand total
= 0.015 x 10000 = 150
2. Sensitivity = Disease & test +ve (A) / Total affected
0.44 = A / 150
A = 66
3. V1 = A + C < C = V1 – A < C = 150 – 66 = 84
Question 2. Answer

4. GT = V1 + V2 < V2 = GT – V1
V2 = 10,000 – 150 = 9850
5. Specificity = Disease & test -ve (D) / Total not affected
0.99 = D / 9850
D = 9751
6. V2 = B + D < B = V2 – D < B = 9850 – 9751 = 99
Questions 2. Answers. A:
Diabetes Total
Present Absent
+ve

66 99 165
Test

-ve

84 9751 9835
Total

150 9850 10000


Question 1. A. Answer
I. The percentage of false positives:

N who test positive


Either, FP =
All without disease

OR FP = 1 – specificity

99
FP = = 1%
9850

OR FP = 1 – 0.99 = 0.01 = 1%
Question 2. A. Answer
II. The percentage of false negatives:

N who test negative


Either, FN =
All with the disease

OR FN = 1 – sensitivity

84
FN = = 56%
150

OR FN = 1 – 0.44 = 0.56 = 56%


Question 2. A. Answer
III. The predictive value of positive test:

People with disease and test +ve


Either, PPV =
All people with a positive test

66
FP = = 0.4 = 40%
165
Question 2. A. Answer
IV. The predictive value of negative test :

People without disease and test -ve


Either, NPV =
All people with a negative test

9751
FP = = 0.991 = 99.1%
9835
Question 2. B. Answer
B. How many false positives and false negatives will occur
if 100,000 persons are screened?
All affected = Prevalence x GT
= 0.015 x 100,000 = 1500
All not affected = GT – Affected = 100,000 – 1500
= 98,500
Cell A = 0.44 x 1500 = 660
Cell B = 1500 – 660 = 840
Cell D = 0.99 x 98,500 = 97,515
Cell C = 98,500 – 97,515 = 985
Questions 2. Answers. B:
Diabetes Total
Present Absent
+ve

660 985 1645


Test

-ve

840 97515 98355


Total

1500 98500 100000


Question 2. B. Answer

B. So,
1. False positives = 985
2. False negatives = 840
Question 3.
A trial to screen Hydatid cyst showed:

Hydatid Total
Present Absent
Test Specific IgE

-ve +ve
level

100 29 129
30 121 151
Total

130 150 280

Calculate sensitivity, specificity and predictive values


Is this test of value in screening?
Question 3. Answer

1. Sensitivity = 100 / 130 = 0.769 = 76.9%


2. Specificity = 121 / 150 = 0.806 = 80.6%
3. PPV = 100 / 129 = 0.775 = 77.5%
4. NPV = 121 / 151 = 0.801 = 80.1%

It is of no screening value.
Question 4.
A trial to screen Hydatid cyst showed:

Hydatid Total
Present Absent
Test Specific IgE

-ve +ve
level

92 22 114
81 128 209
Total

173 150 323

Calculate sensitivity, specificity and predictive values


Is this test of value in screening?
Question 4. Answer

1. Sensitivity = 92 / 173 = 0.531 = 53.1%


2. Specificity = 128 / 150 = 0.853 = 85.3%
3. PPV = 92 / 114 = 0.807 = 80.7%
4. NPV = 128 / 209 = 0.612 = 61.2%

It is of no screening value.
Thank You
Any Questions?
Ali Lateef Jasim
MBChB.

You might also like