Teaching
Teaching
1. Introduction
Learning languages helps students realise their dreams, it opens doors to future
careers, employers, organisations worldwide. Of all the four skills involved in
teaching a foreign language, speaking seems more provocative.
First of all as Nunan (1991) wrote, "success is measured in terms of the ability to
carry out a conversation in the (target) language." Therefore a great number of
264
people in general and students in particular consider that being able to speak a
language means knowing the language and so they view learning the language as
learning how to speak the language. Consequently students may lose interest and
motivation in learning the language if they fail learning how to speak it or if they do
not get chances to speak it during the language class.
Secondly, we simply have to admit that speaking is crucial to human
communication. Only taking into account the amount of spoken exchanges we
produce throughout a day compared to the written communication happening in
the same period of time, it is obvious that speaking prevails over writing.
Nevertheless the paradox is that during language classes the stress is not on
speaking, most of the time being eaten up by reading and writing practice almost
ignoring speaking and listening skills being simply left aside. Thus as Lawtie (…)
rightly underlines, “if the goal of the language course is truly to enable students to
communicate in English, then speaking skills should be taught and practised in the
language classroom”.
265
should be around 10, while in fact normal classes frequently exceed 20 which
burdens the activity-students are not at ease, they are too shy and less
comfortable. Additionally, an advanced speaking activity should create optimal
conditions for developing learners’ sociocultural knowledge, that is “the culturally
embedded rules of social behaviour” (Thornbury 2007: 31) and their linguistic
knowledge, which includes discourse and speech act knowledge, and knowledge
of the grammar, vocabulary and phonology of the target language.
There is not much difference between native and target languages in point of the
processes involved in speaking: conceptualizing, formulating, articulating, self-
monitoring and negotiating. Still, the skill of speaking is not automatically
transferable from the speaker’s first language into the second (Thornbury 2007).
Even students with good command of grammar and vocabulary of the foreign
language find it difficult to unleash their oral discourse, extensive knowledge does
not guarantee success in oral communication; this knowledge should be properly
integrated or accessed.
Problems in speaking may be augmented by excessive self-monitoring and the
habit of formulating utterances in the native language first and then translating
them in the target language. The teachers’ severe monitoring and constant
amending of each and every mistake create obvious costs in terms of fluency and
may lead to producing artificial and less fluent and natural discourse.
As Ur (1995: 121) rightly points out the individual learners’ personalities and
attitudes are also among the problems that are commonly observed in the
language classroom and these may fall into the following categories:
1. inhibition – fear of making mistakes, losing face, criticism; 2. shyness; 3. nothing
to say – learners have problems with finding motives to speak, formulating
opinions or relevant comments; 4. low or uneven participation – often caused by
the tendency of some learners to dominate in the group; 5. mother-tongue use –
particularly common in less disciplined or less motivated classes, learners find it
easier or more natural to express themselves in their native language. Such
problems seem to appear in any language class regardless the level of
proficiency.
266
requires different stage to focus on, for example it seems that at students having
an advanced level of foreign language proficiency should focus more on the stage
of appropriation and its effective movement towards autonomy in target language
use.
We will focus on teaching speaking activities to advanced students as this is our
target group, in other words this is the level of English proficiency of the students
we are working with- students in Economics. They are students of the Faculty of
Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, following the majors: International
Business, Management, Marketing, Finances. They all took English courses at
high school before their undergraduate education in ELT. They all took an
entrance exam in English as the necessary condition for them to study English at
the faculty. The exam covered questions regarding vocabulary and grammar
knowledge. All of the participants had the same English proficiency level (i.e.
ranging somewhere in between intermediate and upper intermediate) based on
their scores obtained at the entrance exam.
We have to start from the fact that every learner enters any learning and
communicative environment with his or her entire personality additionally shaped
by their prior learning and communicative experiences, both positive and negative.
And being aware of this truth is crucial as we meet students with good or very good
knowledge of English who have difficulties when speaking. The only logical
explanation of the situation is that they were not sufficiently trained in speaking and
they were not given the opportunity to practice. Moreover, the lack is more
profound: they admit that it is not only the foreign language class that does not give
them space to state their own opinions, to express feelings, to comment on facts, it
seems that this is the problem of the whole teaching system in Romania where
students are seen as empty buckets that need to be filled up with information.
Students are neither let nor taught to react, to express, to speak. Consequently we
are yearly faced with generations of students who are used to look downwards,
who are afraid to utter. Our task as teachers has proved even more difficult yet
challenging and beautiful when in the end you see progress, you hear students
speaking.
For the purpose of getting them to speak, there is need for a range of speaking
tasks that encourage students, offers them a considerable degree of independence
that is acquired only on extensive and assiduous oral practice. The activities may
take the form of student-teacher or student-student interactions.
According to Thornbury (2007) conversations in foreign language classrooms are
considered to be not the result of language learning but rather the context in which
learning actually occurs. Obviously it is not easy to have very natural, spontaneous
and unstructured pieces of conversation in a planned lesson.
A possible scenario could rely on conversation activities based on a set of selected
themes which are previously negotiated with learners. For example each student
will have to present a topic of his own interest at the beginning of the lesson as a
warm-up activity. After establishing the rule of speaking in turns, students need to
be taught useful conversational routines (opening and closing formulas,
interrupting, asking for clarification) and helpful communication strategies
(paraphrasing and reformulating, using vague language and hesitation fillers).
Other types of activities may begin from a more controlled context in which the
267
language is limited by instructions, or with the use of audio-visual materials; other
examples of speaking tasks could be even the feedback sessions during which
students analyse their own interactions (from grammar, vocabulary, even attitude
and body language).
A class survey is another sample of speaking activity which, if properly conducted,
may engage a large group of students in a speaking activity. For example, students
prepare a set of survey-type questions connected with a particular topic (for
example banking requirements when asking for a bank loan) and they move
around the classroom, asking the questions and putting down the answers.
Afterwards they return to their original groups, they analyse the information
gathered, prepare a presentation that will be reported to the class by a
spokesperson. (Thornbury 2007: 83).
Debates are also very popular and useful forms of classroom oral interaction.
Debates involve discussing a topic from two opposing points of view which are
earlier ascribed to members of the debating teams (Dakowska 2005: 246).
Nevertheless, as Dakowska (2005: 245) points out, there are several requirements
for the chosen topic: it is controversial enough to open different perspectives and
interpretations (i.e. the recent law against smoking in Romania); students involved
are given enough space and autonomy to choose the side and to express their
personal opinions and ideas; students are interested in the topic and their general
knowledge is sufficient enough to discuss it; the debate is planned as a complex
activity for example working in groups or pairs followed by open discussions.
Other speaking activities that advanced students may practice include: storytelling,
jokes, role-play and simulation activities (Thornbury 2007). To conclude, note that
each speaking task needs to be productive, purposeful, interactive, challenging,
safe and authentic (Thornbury 2007: 90) so as to be able to ensure effective
language use.
268
cover in his talk. The candidate will be given 1 minute to prepare his talk and he is
expected to speak for 1-2 minutes; in Part 3, the candidate has a longer discussion
on the same topic. The examiner will ask the candidate further questions
connected to the topic in Part 2.The Speaking test is the same for both Academic
and General Training tests .The candidate’s speaking is assessed on fluency and
coherence, lexical resource, grammatical range and accuracy, and pronunciation.
A band mark is awarded between 1 and 9 with 9 being the highest. The purpose of
the IELTS Speaking test is to assess a wide range of skills. The examiner will want
to see how well the candidate can communicate opinions and information on
everyday topics and common experiences. To do this the candidate will need to
answer a range of questions, speak at length on a given topic using appropriate
language, organise ideas coherently, express and justify opinions, analyse, discuss
and speculate about issues. The candidate will be marked on the four criteria of the
IELTS Speaking Test Band Descriptors i.e. fluency and coherence, lexical
resource, grammatical range and accuracy, pronunciation.
Source: https://www.britishcouncil.ro/examene/ielts/date-taxe
locatii?gclid=CMCJ75j5-csCFTAz0wod5Y0I8Q
269
speaking test can be both frustrating and nerve wrecking for candidates.
IELTS candidates are assessed on their actual performance in an interview that
shouldn’t last longer than 14 minutes. To someone having to do a speaking test in
a foreign language, 14 minutes may seem like a long time but in fact it is a very
short time for a candidate to really show off their English speaking ability and
perform at their best. There are several training activities that may help students
prepare for all parts of the speaking test. Thus this part of the paper aims to
provide ideas for activities similar to those students will encounter in the speaking
exam.
The first step for the students is to make sure they understand the IELTS test
format. They need to know what to expect on the test day. They need to study the
test format by looking carefully at the content of each part of the IELTS test
sample: listening, reading, writing and speaking and by getting to know the
different types of questions they may be asked in each part. Candidates should be
relaxed and talk fluently. They will need to speak naturally.
a. One idea suggested by the IELTS trainers themselves is that the students
practise their long-turn speaking using questions they have made themselves. It is
in fact very simple for the teacher to “create” the pattern questions, but there can
be a real benefit in getting the students to do this themselves. They get to
understand not just structure of the question, but also the type of response it
requires. To see how the questions are modelled, look at this example:
Describe [an adventurous person who you know.] – insert your own topic
You should say:
• who [the person is] insert detail wh question
• how [you know this person] insert detail wh question
• what [this person does that is adventurous] insert detail wh question
• and explain why [you think this person likes to take risks.] insert explanation
why question
The idea is that there is always a topic based on real life/experience that has to be
expanded using detail and some explanation. If students to write their own
questions, they are much more likely to see what type of detail they need to use.
Also, psychologically they are much more likely to focus on answering the question
(rather than provide some pat pre-learned language) if they have written thee
questions themselves. That is as good exam practice as it gets.
Additionally, questions can be categorised into People (describe someone who..),
Places (describe somewhere..), Objects (describe something that..), Habits, Plans
and Experiences.
b. Another possible activity that proves useful is to make students look
around, look at their possessions, go through their photo albums – make cue cards
to describe those people, things and experiences – those are exactly the sort of
things candidates need to talk about in the exam.
c. Other suggestions regarding the speaking test is to take time before the
test to practise speaking with a partner, friend or teacher. Students are advised to
talk as much as they can, talk as fluently as possible and be spontaneous, relax,
be confident and enjoy using English, develop their answers, speak more than the
examiner, ask for clarification if necessary, do not learn prepared answers; the
examiner is trained to spot this and will change the question; the students are also
270
encouraged to plainly express opinions, to practise at home and record
themselves.
d. Another useful piece of advice is to use natural spoken English as this will
help students speak more fluently and improve pronunciation. Here are some
examples of what works: short forms like it’s instead of it is, words like quite that
are used a lot in speaking, common spoken phrases like I guess and I suppose.
The best way to learn this type of language is often to listen to native speakers.
Students are also encouraged to extend their answers. For example, this is
inappropriate: Question:” How many languages do you speak?” Answer: “Two.
Chinese and English.”
The better choice of answer would be:
Answer: “I speak two languages. My first language is Chinese and I speak English
too. I’ve been learning English since I was 10. I started learning it when I was in
primary school.”
However there are situations when short answers are better, for example if
students get a question they do not know very much about. Insisting on talking
about it will bring along incoherency.
e. Students may very well give themselves time to think – repeat/reformulate
the question. In parts 1 and 3 you there is no thinking time: the candidate is
supposed to start speaking immediately. This does not mean, however, that you
he/she has to start answering the question straight away. Instead s/he can start by
repeating/reformulating or commenting on the question: “What did I enjoy doing as
a child? Let me see…” or “That’s not something I’ve thought about before. It’s an
interesting question.’ This approach has several benefits. It is good communication
as it allows a little more time to think.
f. It is always good thing for the student to correct himself if he can do it
immediately. If the student mistakes and he can correct it immediately, he is
advised to do so. This will show the examiner that he has control over the
language.
g. This is a speaking test and not a listening test. If you the question is not
properly understood, the examiner is encouraged to ask the examiner to repeat or
explain it; if a question is not completely understood, the candidate will almost
certainly become incoherent.
h. In addition, students are suggested to learn and use a range of functional
vocabulary such as opinion language as the examiner will be listening to see
whether the candidate can say I think and I like in different ways. This can be a
tough skill to learn as it may require learning new speaking habits.
i. Part 2 of the test is the scary one where the candidate needs to speak for
up to 2 minutes. This is a slightly unusual task and the candidate should effectively
use the preparation time. An idea could be for the candidate to try and write 1 or
maybe 2 sentences so that the ideas are clear before he starts speaking-
sentences come easier than words out of a context.
j. The best advice for IELTS speaking test is very simply to listen to the
question and its grammar and answer it. One example here is in part 1. If the
question in the past tense “What sports did you play as a child?” the only good
answer is to use the past tense as well, the examiner will be listening for this.
k. Trainers also suggest not to be afraid of repeating yourself – think
271
coherence – the “as I was saying” trick may save. Part of the score in speaking is
fluency and coherence. One way to become more coherent is in fact to repeat
yourself. This is something professional speakers do a lot. The trick is not to use
the same words both times. A practical suggestion is to think about finishing the
speech by referring back to something that has already been said. A key phrase
here may be “As I was saying/As I said before” as it helps show the examiner that
ideas are linked together and that in fact is what coherence is.
l. There are persons who find it difficult to explain things or tend to give short
answers, and in this case giving examples may help as examples are great for
explaining ideas and it is much easier to say for example than because. When
offering examples, people just describe things they know and are familiar with and
that takes very little mental effort.
m. Details are very good proofs of mastering vocabulary and IELTS is a
language test therefore the more language used the better. For example, a
question like: “When did you first start to learn English?” should be answered by
giving extra details such as: “I first started to learn English when I was in primary
school. We had around 4 classes a week with our form teacher and sometimes a
native speaker came to help her out and talk to us in English. It was quite funny
because we didn’t understand a word he said. At first I hated it because my teacher
was very strict and forced us to write in English every day.”
n. Candidates should keep in mind that it is an exam and they need to show
the best side of their spoken English. Relaxing too much and becoming too
conversational, may harm English. That is not a true dialogue between two people:
it is more of an interview with one person speaking and the other listening.
5. In conclusion
The paper was intended to stress the importance of teaching speaking to students
of all level focusing on the category of students with advanced proficiency in
English. This teaching of speaking should determine the roles played by the
teacher, the learner and the materials. The main aim of speaking tasks is to help
students develop the fluency of expert speakers where meaning is communicated
with few hesitations and in a manner that is appropriate for the context. Learners
may develop and improve their speaking performance through activities that focus
their attention on language, skills and strategies are therefore an important part of
teaching speaking. The paper also presented some possible activities that help
learners develop their knowledge and also some tips that enhance their speaking
ability.
References
Aleksandrzak, M.(2011) Problems and challenges in teaching and learning
speaking at advanced level, Glottodidactica vol. XXXVII. 37-48. [Online], Available:
pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/gl/article/.../271 [21.03.2016]
Burns, A. (2012) A holistic approach to teaching speaking in the language
classroom, [Online], Available:
http://www.andrasprak.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.204517.1411636356!/menu/standard/fil
e/Anne_Burns.pdf [21.03.2016]
Goh, C. C. M. & Burns, A. (2012) Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. New
272
York: Cambridge University Press.
Dakowska, M. (2005) Teaching English as a Foreign Language. A Guide for
Professionals, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
IELTS speaking tips, [Online], Available:http://www.dcielts.com/ielts-speaking/tips-
for-speaking-exam/ [5.04.2016]
Johnson, K. (1996) Language teaching and skill learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nunan. D. (1991) Language Teaching Methodology. UK: Prentice Hall
International
Thornbury, S. (2007) How to Teach Speaking. Harlow: Pearson Education
Limited.
Ur, P. (1995) A Course in Language Teaching. Practice and Theory. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press
IELTS teaching resources, https://takeielts.britishcouncil.org/teach-ielts/ielts-
teaching-resources
273