The Dark Side of Energy Drinks - National Institute of Health
The Dark Side of Energy Drinks - National Institute of Health
Systematic Review
The Dark Side of Energy Drinks: A Comprehensive Review of
Their Impact on the Human Body
Andrea Costantino 1 , Aniello Maiese 1 , Julia Lazzari 1 , Chiara Casula 1 , Emanuela Turillazzi 1 , Paola Frati 2
and Vittorio Fineschi 2, *
1 Institute of Legal Medicine, Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care
Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 55, 56126 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] (A.C.);
[email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (C.C.);
[email protected] (E.T.)
2 Institute of Legal Medicine, Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences,
Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy; [email protected]
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0649912722
Abstract: In recent years, the consumption of energy drinks by young adults and athletes has risen
significantly, but concerns have been raised about the potential health risks associated with excessive
consumption. These concerns include cardiovascular problems, nervous system disorders, and
the potential for addiction. This review aims to examine the reported effects of acute or chronic
abuse of energy drinks on human health. The analysis shows a significant prevalence of adverse
effects, particularly on the cardiovascular and neurovegetative systems. In particular, the analysis
identified nine cases of cardiac arrest, three of which were fatal. The aetiology of these adverse effects
is attributed to the inherent neurostimulant properties of these beverages, of which caffeine is the
predominant component. A comparison of documented effects in humans with experimental studies
in animal models showed an overlap in results. This review highlights the need for greater rigour in
the assessment of sudden cardiac death, particularly in young people, as legal substances such as
energy drinks may be involved. We propose stricter limits on the consumption of these beverages
than for caffeine, based on the evidence found and the data in the literature. This review also calls
for the establishment of regulations governing the consumption of these products in view of their
Citation: Costantino, A.; Maiese, A.;
Lazzari, J.; Casula, C.; Turillazzi, E.;
potential impact on human health.
Frati, P.; Fineschi, V. The Dark Side of
Energy Drinks: A Comprehensive Keywords: energy drink; Red Bull; Monster; taurine; adverse effects; arrhythmia; death
Review of Their Impact on the
Human Body. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3922.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15183922
1. Introduction
Academic Editor: Maria Luz
Fernandez The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines energy drinks (EDs) as “a class of
products in liquid form that typically contains caffeine, with or without other added ingre-
Received: 30 July 2023 dients.” They typically contain large amounts of caffeine, added sugars, other additives,
Revised: 4 September 2023
and legal stimulants such as guarana, taurine, and L-carnitine. These legal stimulants can
Accepted: 8 September 2023
increase alertness, attention, and energy, as well as increasing blood pressure, heart rate,
Published: 9 September 2023
and breathing. These products are marketed as enhancers of mental acuity and physical
performance [1,2]. Prominent examples of energy drinks include Red Bull, Monster, NOS,
Rockstar, Lucozade, Eastroc Super Drink, Bang Energy, and 5 Hour Energy [3,4], as de-
Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
scribed in Table 1. Adolescents gravitate towards these beverages to swiftly boost energy
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. levels, enhance alertness, and increase scholastic or athletic performance.
This article is an open access article Consequences of this consumption pattern have led to a rising incidence of young
distributed under the terms and individuals seeking medical attention in emergency departments due to an array of ad-
conditions of the Creative Commons verse health outcomes, as documented in results section. Reports underscore that energy
Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// drinks have deleterious effects on a broad spectrum of bodily organs, culminating in mild
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ adversities such as anxiety, gastrointestinal disturbances, dehydration, nervousness, and
4.0/). tachycardia, along with more severe outcomes like rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney injury
(AKI), ventricular fibrillation, seizures, acute mania, and stroke. Furthermore, instances
linking energy drink consumption to fatalities have been documented.
The rise of the energy drink market, particularly within the younger demographic,
has caused a 70% escalation in caffeine ingestion among caffeine-consuming children and
adolescents from 1977 to 2009 [1]. Data sourced from the National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey spotlight an average caffeine intake of 61 mg daily for teenagers [5].
While youth caffeine consumption has receded in recent decades, the utilisation of energy
drinks has concurrently surged [5].
These beverages substantially differ in both caffeine content (ranging from 50 to
505 mg per can or bottle) and caffeine concentration (ranging from 2.5 to 171 mg per
28 mL). By comparison, a 170 g cup of brewed coffee contains caffeine concentrations
varying between 77 and 150 mg [3].
As shown in Table 1, energy drinks are composed of a variety of ingredients, including
taurine, ginseng, sugar, guarana, etc.
Table 1. Most popular energy drinks and ingredients per 500 mL [3,4,6].
tion, reaction time, and emotional state has sparked investigation, although conclusive
evidence on combinatorial cognitive effects remains elusive. Seidl et al. conducted a
double-blind, placebo-controlled trial administering caffeine, taurine, and glucuronolac-
tone to the experimental group, yielding shorter motor reaction times and higher emotional
well-being scores [14]. While the study implied a positive cognitive impact, GABAergic,
glycinergic, cholinergic, and adrenergic neurotransmitter system interactions were posited,
acknowledging the caffeine factor [15].
Gluconolactone, an outcome of hepatic glucose metabolism, stands as a precursor
for ascorbic acid synthesis. In the 1960s, Japanese researchers [16] directed attention
toward its performance-amplifying attributes. A study demonstrated enhanced swimming
endurance in laboratory rats following the direct intestinal injection of glucuronolactone,
glucose, glycogen, and other agents, with the former group outperforming in two of three
instances. The findings suggest that the equivalent human dose could range from 1 to
2 g of glucuronolactone, compared to 600 mg in a Red Bull can. Detoxifying potential may
contribute to these results, as glucuronolactone supplementation may fortify the body’s
natural defences against carcinogens and tumour promoters [8].
Among the additional ingredients commonly found within energy drinks, carnitine,
guarana, and the vitamin B complex should be mentioned.
Carnitine, comprising several compounds, including L-carnitine, acetyl-L-carnitine,
and propionyl-L-carnitine [17], emerges as a derivative of an amino acid. It occurs nat-
urally in numerous foods, particularly animal-derived foods, and is available in dietary
supplement form. Carnitine synthesis transpires endogenously within the liver, kidneys,
and brain from the amino acids, lysine and methionine [18,19]. This compound plays a
pivotal role in energy production, serving as an indispensable cofactor that facilitates the
transport of long-chain fatty acids into mitochondria for oxidation, leading to adenosine
triphosphate (ATP) energy generation [20,21].
Guarana (Paullinia cupana), a climbing plant native to the Amazon, has historically
served as a stimulant and traditional medicine among Brazil’s indigenous peoples [22].
Guarana seeds notably surpass coffee beans in caffeine content, containing additional xan-
thine alkaloids such as theobromine and theophylline [23]. This botanical additive enhances
the caffeine content and stimulatory attributes of energy drinks (EDs), with its caffeine
content being unlisted on product labels due to its status as an herbal supplement [24].
Comprising eight B vitamins, the vitamin B complex includes thiamine (B1), riboflavin
(B2), niacin (B3), pantothenic acid (B5), pyridoxine hydrochloride (B6), biotin (B7), inositol
(B8), and cyanocobalamin (B12). These vitamins act as coenzymes that are integral to proper
cellular function, particularly in mitochondrial activity and energy production. Hence,
there is some conjecture that B vitamins might increase energy expenditure [25].
The aim of this review is to summarise all evidence on the adverse effects of energy
drink consumption.
Figure
Figure 1.
1.Our
Ourreview
reviewstrategy
strategyfollowing PRISMA
following standards.
PRISMA standards.
3. Results
3. Results
The papers
The papersininour
ourstudy
studywere
were divided
divided in in seven
seven groups:
groups: cardiac
cardiac effects
effects (35 papers),
(35 papers),
gastrointestinal effects
gastrointestinal effects (12
(12papers),
papers),neurologic
neurologiceffects
effects(18(18
papers), renal
papers), effects
renal (7), gynaeco-
effects (7),
logical effects (2
gynaecological papers),
effects autoimmune
(2 papers), and skin
autoimmune andeffects (2 papers).
skin effects TableTables
(2 papers). 1, Table
1, 2,2,3,Table
4, 3,
Table
5, 6, 7 4, Table
show 5, Table
brief 6 and Table
descriptions 7 show
of these seven brief descriptions
groups of studies,ofrespectively.
these seven Furthermore,
groups of studies,
respectively.
we incorporated Furthermore,
case–controlwe incorporated
studies utilizing case–control
animal models studies utilizing animal models
(20 papers).
(20 papers).
Nutrients 2023, 15, 3922 5 of 31
Table 2. Cont.
Table 2. Cont.
Table 2. Cont.
Table 3. Cont.
Table 4. Cont.
Table 4. Cont.
Table 7. The results of our review on autoimmune and skin side effects.
positive.
OfWetheevaluated
entire study population, 41 patients (47.7%) had cardiac outcomes, 12 patients
a total of 86 cases (Figure 2). Most of the patients were young (median
(13.9%)
age, 30had gastrointestinal
years; outcomes,
range, 8 to 62 years). 22 (25.7%)
Slightly more menhad (66neurological outcomes,
patients, 76.7%) 7 patients
than women
(8.1%) had renal outcomes, 2 patients (2.3%) had gynaecological outcomes, and
experienced an acute reaction and 35 of them (40.7%) had pathological remote anamnesis 2 patients
(2.3%) had dermatological outcomes.
positive.
Outcomes
Dermatological 2.3
Gynecological 2.3
Renal 8.1
Gastrointestinal 13.9
Neurological 25.7
Cardiac 47.7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Specifically,
Of the entirethe cases
study (n = 41) with
population, a cardiac
41 patients adverse
(47.7%) had event
cardiac(Figure 3) were
outcomes, as follows:
12 patients
(13.9%) had gastrointestinal outcomes, 22 (25.7%) had neurological outcomes, 7
17 (41.5%) arrhythmias, 3 (7.3%) deaths, 6 (14.7%) resuscitated cardiac arrests, 1 (2.4%) patients
(8.1%) had
aneurysm, 5 renal outcomes,
(12.2%) arterial2dissections
patients (2.3%) had or
(aortic gynaecological
coronary), 2outcomes, and 2 patients
(4.9%) cardiomyopathies, 5
(2.3%) had dermatological outcomes.
(12.2%) cases of acute coronary syndrome, 1 (2.4%) case of hypertension, and 1 (2.4%) case
Specifically, the cases (n = 41) with a cardiac adverse event (Figure 3) were as follows:
of syncope. The median age of patients with cardiological outcomes was 27.7 years. Only
17 (41.5%) arrhythmias, 3 (7.3%) deaths, 6 (14.7%) resuscitated cardiac arrests, 1 (2.4%)
in aneurysm,
13 cases (31.7%) was a major pathology found (such as idiopathic QT prolongation,
5 (12.2%) arterial dissections (aortic or coronary), 2 (4.9%) cardiomyopathies,
obesity,
5 (12.2%) cases of acutebicuspid
hypertension, aortic valve,
coronary syndrome, dilatation
1 (2.4%) of the ascending
case of hypertension, aorta, and
and 1 (2.4%)
tetralogy of Fallot).The
case of syncope. Only nineage
median (21.9%) women
of patients had
with a cardiological
cardiological outcome.
outcomes was 27.7 years.
Only in 13 cases (31.7%) was a major pathology found (such as idiopathic QT prolongation,
obesity, hypertension, bicuspid aortic valve, dilatation of the ascending aorta, and tetralogy
of Fallot). Only nine (21.9%) women had a cardiological outcome.
A further 22 cases had neurological outcomes (Figure 4): 6 (27.3%) had clonic seizures,
9 (40.9%) experienced a psychotic event, 2 (9.1%) had manifest retinopathies, 1 (4.5%)
had cerebral ischaemia, 1 (4.5%) had aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage, 1 (4.5%)
had agitation and anxiety, 1 (4.5%) had Rolandic epilepsy, 1 (4.5%) had hyperosmolar
hyperglycaemic syndrome with diabetic ketoacidosis. Only 4 cases (18.2%) were women. In
11 cases (50%) there were pre-existing major pathologies (such as schizophrenia, migraine,
obesity, hypertension, substance abuse).
Cardiac outcomes
Death 0 5 7.3
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Arterial Dissection 12.2
Percentage of specific cardiac outcome
Acute Coronary Syndrome 12.2
Figure 3. Cardiac
Resuscitated outcomes
Cardiac in our review.
Arrest 14.7
A further 22Arrhytmia
cases had neurological outcomes (Figure 4): 6 (27.3%) had 41.5clonic
seizures, 9 (40.9%) experienced 0 a psychotic
5 10 event,
15 220 (9.1%)
25had 30
manifest
35 retinopathies,
40 45 1
(4.5%) had cerebral ischaemia, 1 (4.5%) had aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage, 1
(4.5%) had agitation andPercentage
anxiety, of1 specific
(4.5%)cardiac
had outcome
Rolandic epilepsy, 1 (4.5%) had
hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic syndrome with diabetic ketoacidosis. Only 4 cases (18.2%)
were
Figurewomen.
3. CardiacInoutcomes
11 cases (50%)
in our there were pre-existing major pathologies (such as
review.
Figure 3. Cardiac outcomes in our review.
schizophrenia, migraine, obesity, hypertension, substance abuse).
A further 22 cases had neurological outcomes (Figure 4): 6 (27.3%) had clonic
seizures, 9 (40.9%) experienced a psychotic event, 2 (9.1%) had manifest retinopathies, 1
(4.5%) had cerebral ischaemia,Neurologic outcomes
1 (4.5%) had aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage, 1
(4.5%) had agitation and anxiety, 1 (4.5%) had Rolandic epilepsy, 1 (4.5%) had
hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic syndrome with diabetic ketoacidosis. Only 4 cases (18.2%)
were women. In 11 cases (50%) there were pre-existing major pathologies (such as
Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic Syndrome 4.5
schizophrenia, migraine, obesity, hypertension, substance abuse).
Rolandic Epilepsy 4.5
Agitation and Anxiety
Neurologic4.5outcomes
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage 4.5
Brain Ischemia 4.5
Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic Syndrome
Retinopathies 4.5 9.1
Rolandic
ClonicEpilepsy
Seizure 4.5 27.3
Agitation and Anxiety
Psychosis Event 4.5 40.9
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
0 5 4.510 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Brain Ischemia 4.5
Percentage of specific neurologic outcomes
Retinopathies 9.1
Figure 4. Neurologic outcomes in ourSeizure
review.
Figure 4. Neurologic outcomesClonic
in our review. 27.3
Psychosis Event 40.9
There were 12 cases of gastrointestinal problems (Figure 5): 4 (33.5%) had pancre-
atitis, 5 (41.6%) had hepatitis, 1 (8.3%) had0 toxic5 triad
10 syndrome
15 20 25(gastritis,
30 35 hepatitis
40 45 and
pancreatitis), 1 (8.3%) had hypercobalaminaemia and 1 (8.3%) had atrophic gastritis (AG)
Percentage
and gastrointestinal metaplasia of specific
(GIM). Seven neurologic outcomes
cases (58.3%) had major pathologies (such
as diabetes mellitus, small-cell left lung carcinoma, serine protease inhibitor Kazal type I
Figure 4. Neurologic outcomes in our review.
Nutrients 2023, 15, 3922 15 of 30
Gastrointestinal outcomes
Gastrointestinal outcomes
Hypercobalaminemia 8.3
Hypercobalaminemia 8.3
Pancreatitis 33.5
Pancreatitis 33.5
Hepatitis 41.6
Hepatitis 41.6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Percentage of specific gastrointestinal outcomes
Percentage of specific gastrointestinal outcomes
WeWe foundseven
seven casesthat
that developedrenal
renal disease(Figure
(Figure 6):four
four hadAKIAKI (57.1%),
Wefound
found sevencases
cases thatdeveloped
developed renaldisease
disease (Figure6):
6): fourhadhad AKI (57.1%),
(57.1%),
two
two (28.6%) had rhabdomyolysis, one (14.3%) had hyponatraemia followed by a coma.
two (28.6%)
(28.6%) had
had rhabdomyolysis,
rhabdomyolysis, one
one (14.3%)
(14.3%) had
had hyponatraemia
hyponatraemia followed
followed byby aa coma.
coma.
Three ofthese
Three these cases(42.8%)
(42.8%) hadmajor
major comorbidities(such
(such astype
type 2 diabetesmellitus,
mellitus,
Threeofof thesecases
cases (42.8%)had
had majorcomorbidities
comorbidities (such asas type 22 diabetes
diabetes mellitus,
hypertension, alcoholabuse,
hypertension, abuse, PTSD,psychiatric
psychiatric history),and
and onlyoneone ofthe
the sevencases
cases
hypertension, alcohol
alcohol abuse, PTSD,
PTSD, psychiatric history),
history), and only
only oneof of theseven
seven cases
(14.3%)
(14.3%) was female.
(14.3%)was
wasfemale.
female.
Percentage of
Percentage of specific
specific renal
renal outcomes
outcomes
Hyponatremia 14.3
Hyponatremia 14.3
Rhabdomyolysis 28.6
Rhabdomyolysis 28.6
Acute Kidney Injury 57.1
Acute Kidney Injury 57.1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
We also had two cases with gynaecological findings; in one case (50%), we found
macrosomia and in the other (50%) severe menorrhagia. None of them had major pathologies.
Nutrients 2023, 15, 3922 16 of 30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
4.4.Discussion
Discussion
Consumptionofofenergy
Consumption energydrinks
drinkshashasincreased
increasedin inrecent
recentyears
yearsfor
forseveral
severalreasons
reasons[2].
[2].
Oneof
One ofthe
the main
main factors is the the aggressive
aggressivemarketing
marketingand andpromotion
promotionofofenergyenergydrinks
drinksby
bybeverage
beveragecompanies,
companies,primarily
primarilytargeting
targeting young
young adults
adults andand adolescents
adolescents [101].
[101]. This
This
marketingoften
marketing oftenfocuses
focuseson onthetheenergizing
energizingand andstimulating
stimulatingeffects
effectsofofenergy
energydrinks
drinksandand
their association with extreme sports and other high-energy activities.
their association with extreme sports and other high-energy activities. Another reason forAnother reason for
theincreasing
the increasingconsumption
consumptionofofenergyenergydrinks
drinksisisthe
thebelief
beliefthat
thatthey
theycan
canimprove
improvecognitive
cognitive
andphysical
and physicalperformance.
performance. Many Many people
people consume
consume energy
energy drinks
drinksto toboost
boosttheir
theirenergy
energy
levels,
levels,improve
improve focus
focusandand
concentration,
concentration,and enhance athletic
and enhance performance.
athletic However,
performance. while
However,
energy drinks may
while energy drinksprovide some short-term
may provide benefitsbenefits
some short-term in thesein areas,
thesetheir long-term
areas, effects
their long-term
on health
effects onand performance
health and performanceremainremain
unclear [102]. [102].
unclear Finally, the increasing
Finally, availability
the increasing of
availability
energy drinks in grocery stores, petrol stations, and other retail outlets
of energy drinks in grocery stores, petrol stations, and other retail outlets has alsohas also contributed
tocontributed
their increased consumption.
to their increased Energy drinks Energy
consumption. are oftendrinks
promoted as a convenient
are often promoted and as a
portable
convenientsource
andofportable
energy source
and stimulation,
of energy making them a popular
and stimulation, makingchoice
them afor peoplechoice
popular who
travel a lot or
for people who have busy
travel lifestyles.
a lot However,
or have busy the easy
lifestyles. availability
However, the easyofavailability
energy drinks also
of energy
means that they are more likely to be consumed in excess, which can increase the risk of
negative side effects.
Nutrients 2023, 15, 3922 19 of 31
The main psychoactive substance in an energy drink is caffeine. They also contain
other ingredients that are thought to increase energy and mental alertness, such as taurine,
guarana, ginseng, vitamins, and others [101].
The effects of these drinks on the human body are not fully understood, which is why
research into their negative effects has increased.
Figureeffects
Figure 8. Pathological 8. Pathological
of energyeffects
drinksofonenergy drinks
cardiac tissue.on cardiac tissue.
Caffeine enhances
4.2. Effectsdopamine-related
on the Neurological behaviour
System by inhibiting adenosine A2A receptors
and increasing transmission via dopamine
The consumption of energy D2drinks
receptors. Lorist caffeine
containing and Tops and[111] used
other an
substances ma
echoencephalograph (EEG) to highlight the alpha wavelength of the brain (alpha
have effects on the central nervous system, such as seizures, cerebral vasculopath power).
They found that caffeine intake increased left frontal activation compared to the right,
manic psychosis. Studies have shown that these ingredients overstimulate the adre
suggesting that dopamine function may be linked to fatigue, with caffeine reducing fa-
system, leading to hyperglycaemia, hypokalemia, leukocytosis, and metabolic aci
tigue. Doses of less than 500 mg result in increased alertness, increased speed of thoughts
The psychostimulant effects of caffeine are evident at low doses.
and speech, decreased fatigue and reduced sleep. Higher doses may cause restlessness,
Caffeine enhances dopamine-related behaviour by inhibiting adenosine
anxiety, insomnia, tremors, and, in cases of acute toxicity, seizures that do not respond
receptors and increasing transmission via dopamine D2 receptors. Lorist and Tops
to antiepileptic drugs [112] (Figure 9). The ingestion of caffeine at very high (pharma-
used an echoencephalograph (EEG) to highlight the alpha wavelength of the brain (
cological) doses has been associated with the possible occurrence of seizures. In animal
power). They found that caffeine intake increased left frontal activation compared
models, intraperitoneal administration of caffeine produces convulsions associated with
right, suggesting that dopamine function may be linked to fatigue, with caffeine red
electroencephalography. In humans, seizures have been reported after the overdose or
fatigue. Doses of less than 500 mg result in increased alertness, increased spe
ingestion of drug preparations. The consumption of energy drinks has been associated
thoughts
with the occurrence and speech,
of seizures, both indecreased
patients with fatigue
known andepilepsy
reduced andsleep. Higher
in those withoutdoses may
restlessness,
a history of epilepsy anxiety,
[113]. This mayinsomnia,
be due to the tremors, and, in content
high caffeine cases ofof acute
energytoxicity,
drinks. seizures th
At normal average doses of caffeine in humans, caffeine acts as an adenosine receptor at very
not respond to antiepileptic drugs [112] (Figure 9). The ingestion of caffeine
antagonist with(pharmacological)
equal affinity fordosesA1 andhas A2A
been associated
receptors. with
When theadministered
possible occurrence
acutely, of seizu
caffeine acts dominantly on A1 receptors (as ambient adenosine activates them). The convu
animal models, intraperitoneal administration of caffeine produces
chronic use of associated withtoelectroencephalography.
caffeine leads the tolerance of A1 receptors. In humans,
Caffeine seizures
then hashave been reported aft
negligible
overdose or ingestion of drug preparations. The consumption
effects on the A1 receptor and dominant effects on A2A receptors. The endocannabinoids, of energy drinks has
associated with the occurrence of seizures, both in patients
endogenous ligands of the cannabinoid receptors, are synthesised as needed in response with known epilepsy a
those without a history of epilepsy [113]. This may be
to increased neuronal excitation and activate the presynaptic CB1 receptor, reduce thedue to the high caffeine cont
energy drinks.
levels of cyclic AMP (cAMP) released and decrease neurotransmitter release. Caffeine
At normal
increases neurotransmitter average
release by doses
removingof caffeine in humans,
the inhibitory caffeine
control acts as an adenosine
of acetylcholine in rec
the hippocampusantagonist with equal
and prefrontal affinity
cortex, for A1 the
regulating andopening
A2A receptors.
of potassium Whenchannels
administered ac
mediated by A1 caffeine actsand
receptors dominantly
increasingon theA1 receptors
firing rate of(as
A2A ambient
receptors adenosine activates them
in the striatum
chronic use of caffeine leads to the tolerance of A1 receptors.
dendritic spines of neurons. This inhibits glutamatergic thalamocortical neurons by induc- Caffeine then has neg
effects on the A1 receptor and dominant effects on A2A
ing cell activation and stimulating the adenylate cyclase pathway. Caffeine blocks A2A receptors. The endocannabi
endogenous
receptors and reduces ligands of the
the stimulatory cannabinoid
effects of adenosine receptors,
on cAMP.are synthesised
Caffeine canas needed in res
reduce
to increased
the inhibition on neuronaltransmission
striatal dopamine excitation and by activate
reducingthe thepresynaptic CB1 receptor,
activity of striatal neu- redu
levels
rons and causing the of cyclic AMPof(cAMP)
disinhibition released and
thalamo-cortical decrease
projection neurotransmitter
neurons. The activation release. Ca
increases
of A2A receptors neurotransmitter
leads to cAMP production, release
andby removing
the activation theofinhibitory
D2 receptors control of acetylchol
reduces
the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, regulating the opening of potassium cha
mediated by A1 receptors and increasing the firing rate of A2A receptors in the str
dendritic spines of neurons. This inhibits glutamatergic thalamocortical neuro
activation of A2A receptors leads to cAMP production, and the activation of D2 recep
reduces cAMP production and causes an inverse regulation of the activity of cA
dependent protein kinase (PKA) [114]. As caffeine mimics the effect of dopamin
striatopallidal neurons, it causes a progressive sensitisation of cannabinoid CB1 recep
which control GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) [115]. The caff
Nutrients 2023, 15, 3922 21 of 31
blockade of A2A receptors reduces the activation of cAMP-PKA pathways, resultin
increased glutamate release, the activation of mGlu5 metabotropic receptors,
endocannabinoid release. The blockade of adenosine A2A receptors in the striatum
cAMP production beenand causes
linked to theanpsychoactive
inverse regulation of the
properties activityThere
of caffeine. of cAMP-dependent
is also evidence that a sp
protein kinase genetic
(PKA) [114].
polymorphism of the adenosine A2A receptoroninfluences
As caffeine mimics the effect of dopamine striatopallidal
habitual caff
neurons, it causes a progressive sensitisation
consumption in humans [116]. of cannabinoid CB1 receptors, which control
GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic
Richard and Smith currents (IPSCs)reviewed
[117] recently [115]. The
thecaffeine
literatureblockade of A2Amental h
on the chronic
receptors reduces the activation of cAMP-PKA pathways, resulting in increased glutamate
effects of energy drinks. They concluded that while the acute effects of energy drink
release, the activation of mGlu5
mood appear metabotropic
to be receptors,
positive, chronic and endocannabinoid
consumption is associatedrelease. The anxiety
with stress,
blockade of adenosine A2A receptors in the striatum has been linked to the psychoactive
depression. Taurine is a molecule that crosses the blood–brain barrier and binds to G
properties of caffeine. There
receptors. is also
It can mimicevidence that of
the effects a specific
GABA andgenetic polymorphism
glycine, resulting inofantheanticonvu
adenosine A2Aeffectreceptor influences habitual caffeine consumption in
that has a stabilising effect on membranes inside and outsidehumans [116].
the cell.
Figureeffects
Figure 9. Pathological 9. Pathological
of energyeffects
drinksofonenergy drinks
cerebral on cerebral tissues.
tissues.
also investigated the effects of these two substances in combination. In their experimental
study of rats exposed to the substances for 90 days, changes in the temporal cortex and
hippocampus were analysed. The results show an inflammatory response associated
with oxidative stress, local gliosis, and increased levels of IL-1, TNF-1, iNOS, reactive
oxygen species, lipid peroxidation, and nitric oxide. In addition, at the neurological level,
Ulenius [132] and colleagues demonstrated that the combination of caffeine and taurine
enhances the stimulant properties of ethanol on the locomotor system, a phenomenon
previously associated with substance dependence and associated with increased dopamine
levels and reward circuits. Ugwuja [133] conducted experiments to assess the biochemical
effects of energy drinks alone or in combination with alcohol on albino rats. The study
showed changes in total white blood cell count, plasma potassium, calcium, renal function,
liver enzymes, and plasma triglycerides. Krahe et al. [134] also analysed the effects of
combined energy drink and alcohol consumption. Overall, animals treated with alcohol
and energy drinks showed increased locomotor activity and increased anxiety levels in
the open field test. They also showed an early loss of the righting reflex and poorer motor
coordination in the rotarod test. These effects on righting reflex and motor coordination
were associated with the over-activation of cerebellar GABAA receptors. The data also show
that exposure to alcohol in combination with energy drinks prolongs the duration of motor
impairment and ataxia in adolescent mice. This ability to prolong the effects of alcohol may
explain why this group performed worse in the righting reflex loss test after cumulative
administration of alcohol and energy drinks compared to animals receiving alcohol alone.
Reis et al. [135] investigated the effects of 14 days of energy drink consumption alone or in
combination with ethanol on oxidative stress parameters, including superoxide dismutase
(SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and the lipid peroxidation marker
malondialdehyde (MDA) in 40-day “adolescent” mice. The ethanol-treated group showed
a significant increase in SOD and GSH-Px activity in brain tissue compared with the control
group. The elevated MDA levels observed in rats co-exposed to energy drinks and ethanol,
as well as those exposed to energy drinks alone, may be a consequence of increased free
radical formation and altered cellular antioxidant defence status. Liver histopathology
results show that energy drinks may induce liver damage, and the combined effect of
ethanol and energy drinks may cause more significant damage than either substance alone,
as indicated by increased MDA levels. A histopathological examination of brain tissue
did not show any treatment-related abnormalities, possibly due to the short duration of
the experiment.
Nasi and colleagues [136] investigated the possible negative effect of energy drinks on
the gastrointestinal tract by administering different substances to rats for five consecutive
days. They did not observe any acute lesions in the gastrointestinal tract, but they did
observe an eosinophilic infiltration in the intestinal mucosa. This histopathological change
was also observed in rats treated with caffeine alone, suggesting that this inflammatory
effect is a direct consequence of this substance, which is also present in energy drinks.
Elçi et al. [137] investigated the effects of eight weeks of energy drink consumption
on the female reproductive system, specifically analysing follicular ovarian reserve and
anti-Müllerian hormone levels in the blood. They found a significant decrease in both
parameters. Instead, Oyelowo et al. [138] focused on the biochemical effects of both natural
and artificial energy drinks on testicular tissue after 28 consecutive days of consumption
in pubertal male rats. Their results showed negative effects of energy drink consumption,
whether natural or artificial, on male reproductive functions, including decreased testos-
terone steroidogenesis in Leydig cells, changes in gonadotropin synthesis, and disruption
of sperm homeostasis.
Al-Basher et al. [139] conducted a study on the effects of perinatal exposure to caffeine-
based energy drinks on the liver, kidneys, brain, locomotor activity, and anxiety in newborn
mice. Pregnant mice received 2.5 or 5 mL of energy drinks from the first day of pregnancy
until 15 days after birth. Perinatal exposure to energy drinks resulted in a significant
increase in lipid peroxidation (MDA) and a decrease in antioxidant defences in the liver,
Nutrients 2023, 15, 3922 25 of 31
kidneys, brain, cerebellum, and medulla oblongata of newborn mice on days 21 and
35 after birth. Energy drinks also induced various histological alterations, including
vacuolation and lipid infiltration of hepatocytes, developing degenerated glomeruli and
dilated interstitial spaces in the renal cortex, pyknosis and chromatolysis of cerebral and
medullary neurons, and degenerated and abnormal Purkinje cells in the cerebellum. In
addition, energy drinks increased locomotor activity and induced anxiety-like behaviour
in newborn mice.
Posokhov et al. [140] investigated the effects of two months of energy drink consump-
tion on red blood cell membranes. They used the fluorescent probe O1O (2-(20 -OH-phenyl)-
5-phenyl-1,3-oxazole), which localises to the area of glycerol backbones, carbonyl groups
of phospholipids, and hydrocarbon chains of phospholipids (near carbonyl groups) in the
bilayer. The consumption of energy drinks was associated with increased fluorescence
intensity in erythrocyte suspensions compared to control animals. The observed change in
probe fluorescence is attributed to an increase in the viscosity of the probe environment
within the membrane. Using the fluorescent probe O1O, it was shown that the long-term
oral administration of caffeine-based energy drinks to rats caused an increase in membrane
viscosity (resulting in reduced fluidity) in red blood cells.
5. Conclusions
This extensive literature review includes a large number of research studies on the
potentially fatal health effects of both acute and chronic abuse of these substances. These
consequences include cardiac arrhythmias, neurological and behavioural changes, acute
organ inflammation (including the liver, stomach, pancreas, and kidneys) and even cases of
rare dermatitis or autoimmune disorders. Furthermore, although based on a limited case
pool, it is noteworthy that there is a marked disparity in the literature between cases of car-
diac arrest requiring intensive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (nine cases) and documented
deaths (three cases) resulting from energy drink abuse. These statistics suggest a plausible
under-reporting of deaths associated with these substances, particularly among frequent
users such as adolescents and athletes. Consequently, in the investigation of sudden cardiac
death in young people, the role of the pathologist in meticulously collecting anamnestic and
circumstantial data from the deceased, recognising the potential involvement of non-illicit
substances such as energy drinks, becomes crucial [141].
The results of experimental studies in animal models echo the findings of the review,
demonstrating acute and chronic effects consistent with observations in humans.
Although individual components have been shown to be safe [142], excessive con-
sumption, especially among adolescents, often leads to potential adverse effects on human
health. As shown in this review, these effects can vary, particularly regarding the cardiovas-
cular and cerebral systems. It would therefore be important to consider the introduction of
precise limits on the consumption of these drinks. As caffeine is the most representative
ingredient in terms of composition, it is first necessary to consider the upper limits of safe
caffeine intake. Most cans of energy drinks (250 mL) contain 50 to 150 mg of caffeine, while
the EFSA upper safe intake limit for adults is up to 400 mg per day (about 5.7 mg/kg
bw per day for a 70 kg adult), with a single dose not exceeding 200 mg [143]. In fact, no
health concerns regarding acute toxicity, bone status, cardiovascular health, cancer risk, or
male fertility have been raised by other agencies in previous assessments at this level of
habitual caffeine consumption. The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) estimates that
toxic effects, such as seizures, may be observed following the rapid consumption of about
1200 mg of caffeine, or about 0.15 tablespoons of pure caffeine [144]. For pregnant or breast-
feeding women, the safe daily intake of caffeine is halved from 400 mg to 200 mg, or about
half a can. Finally, for children and adolescents, it is important to accentuate that neither
EFSA nor the FDA have indicated a safe limit, suggesting that these substances should be
avoided altogether, as further emphasised by the American Academy of Pediatrics due to
possible long-term negative effects on behavioural disorders.
Nutrients 2023, 15, 3922 26 of 31
Therefore, based on our observations and those found in the literature, we suggest that
the daily intake of energy drinks should not only not exceed the safety limits for caffeine
established by European and American regulatory authorities, but should be even lower.
Indeed, these drinks also contain other neurostimulants, the effects of which are not fully
understood. Furthermore, as this review points out, there are cases in the literature of
people with no known medical conditions who have suffered acute cardiac events after
consuming just a few 250 mL cans of these drinks. Given that the concentration of caffeine
in these drinks is between 50 and 150 mg per can (250 mL), we recommend no more than
one can at a time and two cans per day to remain within an acceptable safety limit. We also
believe that it is necessary to clearly state the daily intake limit for products containing
high levels of caffeine (such as ‘Demon Energy Shot’, which contains 200 mg of caffeine in
60 mL of product), given the potential risk of acute caffeine intoxication [145].
In addition, the sale and consumption of these drinks in minors should be regulated as,
although they are legal substances, their long-term effects are not yet known and may lead
to psychiatric pathologies or the aggravation of cardiac conduction disorders. Increased
public education on the potential risks associated with the misuse of energy drinks is
warranted to enable individuals to make informed decisions regarding consumption.
Furthermore, extensive research is needed to elucidate the long-term effects of energy
drink consumption on human health.
Author Contributions: Conceptualisation, A.M. and A.C.; methodology, V.F.; validation, P.F. and E.T.;
formal analysis, J.L.; investigation, C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.; writing—review
and editing, A.M.; supervision, V.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of
the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available in Tables 2–7.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Seifert, S.M.; Schaechter, J.L.; Hershorin, E.R.; Lipshultz, S.E. Health Effects of Energy Drinks on Children, Adolescents, and
Young Adults. Pediatrics 2011, 127, 511–528. [CrossRef]
2. Heckman, M.; Sherry, K.; De Mejia, E.G. Energy Drinks: An Assessment of Their Market Size, Consumer Demographics,
Ingredient Profile, Functionality, and Regulations in the United States. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2010, 9, 303–317. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
3. Reissig, C.J.; Strain, E.C.; Griffiths, R.R. Caffeinated energy drinks—A growing problem. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009, 99, 1–10.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Rath, M. Energy drinks: What is all the hype? The dangers of energy drink consumption. J. Am. Acad. Nurse Pract. 2012, 24,
70–76. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Drewnowski, A.; Rehm, C.D. Sources of Caffeine in Diets of US Children and Adults: Trends by Beverage Type and Purchase
Location. Nutrients 2016, 8, 154. [CrossRef]
6. Higgins, J.P.; Tuttle, T.D.; Higgins, C.L. Energy beverages: Content and safety. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2010, 85, 1033–1041. [CrossRef]
7. Eley, D.W.; Lake, N.; Eter Keurs, H. Taurine depletion and excitation-contraction coupling in rat myocardium. Circ. Res. 1994, 74,
1210–1219. [CrossRef]
8. Wassef, B.; Kohansieh, M.; Makaryus, A.N. Effects of energy drinks on the cardiovascular system. World J. Cardiol. 2017, 9,
796–806. [CrossRef]
9. Timbrell, J.A.; Seabra, V.; Waterfield, C.J. The in vivo and in vitro protective properties of taurine. Gen. Pharmacol. Vasc. Syst.
1995, 26, 453–462. [CrossRef]
10. Schaffer, S.W.; Shimada, K.; Jong, C.J.; Ito, T.; Azuma, J.; Takahashi, K. Effect of taurine and potential interactions with caffeine on
cardiovascular function. Amino Acids 2014, 46, 1147–1157. [CrossRef]
11. Lake, N.; de Roode, M.; Nattel, S. Effects of taurine depletion on rat cardiac electrophysiology: In vivo and in vitro studies. Life
Sci. 1987, 40, 1017–1026. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Satoh, H. Inhibition of the Fast Na+ Current by Taurine in Guinea Pig Ventricular Myocytes. Gen. Pharmacol. Vasc. Syst. 1998, 31,
155–157. [CrossRef]
Nutrients 2023, 15, 3922 27 of 31
13. Chepkova, A.N.; Doreulee, N.; Yanovsky, Y.; Mukhopadhyay, D.; Haas, H.L.; Sergeeva, O.A. Long-term enhancement of
corticostriatal neurotransmission by taurine. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2002, 16, 1523–1530. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Seidl, R.; Peyrl, A.; Nicham, R.; Hauser, E. A taurine and caffeine-containing drink stimulates cognitive performance and
well-being. Amino Acids 2000, 19, 635–642. [CrossRef]
15. Kim, W. Debunking the Effects of Taurine in Red Bull Energy Drink. Nutr. Bytes 2003, 9, 1.
16. Tamura, S.; Tsutsumi, S.; Ito, H.; Nakai, K.; Masuda, M. Effects of glucuronolactone and the other carbohydrates on the
biochemicalchanges produced in the living body of rats by hard exercise. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 1968, 18, 30–38. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Ross, A.C.; Caballero, B.; Cousins, R.J.; Tucker, K.L.; Ziegler, T.R. Carnitine. In Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease, 11th ed.;
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2014; pp. 252–253.
18. Ferreira, G.C.; McKenna, M.C. l-Carnitine and Acetyl-l-carnitine Roles and Neuroprotection in Developing Brain. Neurochem. Res.
2017, 42, 1661–1675. [CrossRef]
19. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine;
National Institute of Mental Health; Office of Dietary Supplements; National Institutes of Health. Carnitine: The Science Behind a
Conditionally Essential Nutrient; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004.
20. Belay, B.; Esteban-Cruciani, N.; Walsh, C.A.; Kaskel, F.J. The use of levo-carnitine in children with renal disease: A review and a
call for future studies. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2006, 21, 308–317. [CrossRef]
21. NIH—National Institutes of Health-Carnitine Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. Available online: https://ods.od.nih.gov/
factsheets/Carnitine-HealthProfessional/ (accessed on 17 April 2023).
22. Schimpl, F.C.; da Silva, J.F.; Gonçalves, J.F.d.C.; Mazzafera, P. Guarana: Revisiting a highly caffeinated plant from the Amazon.
J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 150, 14–31. [CrossRef]
23. Moustakas, D.; Mezzio, M.; Rodriguez, B.R.; Constable, M.A.; Mulligan, M.E.; Voura, E.B. Guarana Provides Additional
Stimulation over Caffeine Alone in the Planarian Model. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123310. [CrossRef]
24. D’Angelo, S.; Ascione, A. Guarana and physical performance: A myth or reality? J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 2020, 15, S539–S551.
25. Williams, M.H. Dietary Supplements and Sports Performance: Introduction and Vitamins. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2004, 1, 1–6.
[CrossRef]
26. Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gotzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.;
Moher, D. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Healthcare
Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. BMJ 2009, 339, b2700. [CrossRef]
27. Argano, C.; Colomba, D.; Di Chiara, T.; La Rocca, E. Take the wind out your salis: Relationship among energy drink abuse,
hypertension, and break-up of cerebral aneurysm. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2012, 7, 9–10. [CrossRef]
28. Avcı, S.; Sarıkaya, R.; Büyükcam, F. Death of a young man after overuse of energy drink. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2013, 31,
1624.e3–1624.e4. [CrossRef]
29. Berger, A.J.; Alford, K. Cardiac Arrest in a Young Man Following Excess Consumption of Caffeinated “Energy Drinks”. Med. J.
Aust. 2009, 190, 41–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Benjo, A.M.; Pineda, A.M.; Nascimento, F.O.; Zamora, C.; Lamas, G.A.; Escolar, E. Left Main Coronary Artery Acute Thrombosis
Related to Energy Drink Intake. Circulation 2012, 125, 1447–1448. [CrossRef]
31. Cannon, M.E.; Cooke, C.T.; McCarthy, J.S. Caffeine-induced cardiac arrhythmia: An unrecognized danger of health food products.
Med. J. Aust. 2001, 174, 520–526. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Choudhury, T.R.; Abdool, M.A.; Galasko, G. Energy drinks give you wings but also an abnormal exercise test. BMJ Case Rep. 2017,
2017, bcr-2017. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. Di Rocco, J.R.; During, A.; Morelli, P.J.; Heyden, M.; Biancaniello, T.A. Atrial fibrillation in healthy adolescents after highly
caffeinated beverage consumption: Two case reports. J. Med. Case Rep. 2011, 5, 18. [CrossRef]
34. Dufendach, K.A.; Horner, J.M.; Cannon, B.C.; Ackerman, M.J. Congenital type 1 long QT syndrome unmasked by a highly
caffeinated energy drink. Heart Rhythm. 2012, 9, 285–288. [CrossRef]
35. Enriquez, A.; Frankel, D.S. Arrhythmogenic Effects of Energy Drinks. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2017, 28, 711–717. [CrossRef]
36. Gharacholou, S.M.; Ijioma, N.; Banwart, E.; Munoz, F.D.C. ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Normal Coronary
Arteries after Consuming Energy Drinks. Case Rep. Cardiol. 2017, 2017, 4061205. [CrossRef]
37. Hanif, M.; Saleem, S.; Naz, S.; Sundas, F. Energy Drinks and Atrial Fibrillation: An Unusual Case of Caution. Cureus 2020, 12,
e10807. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Israelit, S.H.; Strizevsky, A.; Raviv, B. ST elevation myocardial infarction in a young patient after ingestion of caffeinated energy
drink and ecstasy. World J. Emerg. Med. 2012, 3, 305–307. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. Jonjev, Z.S.; Bala, G. High-energy drinks may provoke aortic dissection. Coll. Antropol. 2013, 37, 227–229. [PubMed]
40. Kaoukis, A.; Panagopoulou, V.; Mojibian, H.R.; Jacoby, D. Reverse Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Associated With the Consumption
of an Energy Drink. Circulation 2012, 125, 1584–1585. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
41. Khan, R.; Osman, M.; Zafar, S.; Sen, S. Energy Drink Induced Ventricular Fibrillation and Cardiac Arrest: A Successful Outcome.
J. Med. Cases 2015, 6, 409–412. [CrossRef]
42. Mattioli, A.V.; Pennella, S.; Farinetti, A.; Manenti, A. Energy Drinks and atrial fibrillation in young adults. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 37,
1073–1074. [CrossRef]
Nutrients 2023, 15, 3922 28 of 31
43. Nagajothi, N.; Khraisat, A.; Velazquez-Cecena, J.-L.E.; Arora, R.; Raghunathan, K.; Patel, R.; Parajuli, R. Energy Drink-related
Supraventricular Tachycardia. Am. J. Med. 2008, 121, e3–e4. [CrossRef]
44. Osman, H.; Tabatabai, S.; Korashy, M.; Hussein, M. Caffeinated Energy Drink Induced Ventricular Fibrillation: The Price for
Overexcitement. Cureus 2019, 11, e6358. [CrossRef]
45. Peake, S.T.C.; Mehta, P.A.; Dubrey, S.W. Atrial fibrillation-related cardiomyopathy: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2007, 1,
111–112. [CrossRef]
46. Polat, N. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a healthy adolescent following consumption of caffeinated “energy drinks”.
Turk Kardiyol. Dern. Ars.-Arch. Turk. Soc. Cardiol. 2013, 41, 738–742. [CrossRef]
47. Rottlaender, D.; Motloch, L.; Reda, S.; Larbig, R.; Hoppe, U. Cardiac arrest due to long QT syndrome associated with excessive
consumption of energy drinks. Int. J. Cardiol. 2012, 158, e51–e52. [CrossRef]
48. Rutledge, M.; Witthed, A.; Khouzam, R.N. It took a Redbull to unmask Brugada syndrome. Int. J. Cardiol. 2012, 161, e14–e15.
[CrossRef]
49. Sattari, M.; Sattari, A.; Kazory, A. Energy Drink Consumption and Cardiac Complications: A Case for Caution. J. Addict. Med.
2016, 10, 280–282. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
50. Scott, M.J.; El-Hassan, M.; Khan, A.A. Myocardial infarction in a young adult following the consumption of a caffeinated energy
drink. BMJ Case Rep. 2011, 2011, bcr0220113854. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51. Solomin, D.; Borron, S.W.; Watts, S.H. STEMI Associated with Overuse of Energy Drinks. Case Rep. Emerg. Med. 2015, 2015,
537689. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
52. Ten Bos, L.M.; Veenstra, T.C.; Westerhof, B.D.; Bosch, F.H. A case of extreme hypokalaemia. Neth. J. Med. 2016, 74, 9.
53. Terlizzi, R.; Rocchi, C.; Serra, M.; Solieri, L.; Cortelli, P. Reversible postural tachycardia syndrome due to inadvertent overuse of
Red Bull® . Clin. Auton. Res. 2008, 18, 221–223. [CrossRef]
54. Torbey, E.; Rafeh, N.A.; Khoueiry, G.; Kowalski, M.; Bekheit, S. Ginseng: A potential cause of long QT. J. Electrocardiol. 2011, 44,
357–358. [CrossRef]
55. Ullah, M.W.; Lakhani, S.; Siddiq, W.; Handa, A.; Kahlon, Y.; Siddiqui, T. Energy Drinks and Myocardial Infarction. Cureus 2018,
10, e2658. [CrossRef]
56. Ünal, S.; Şensoy, B.; Yilmaz, S.; Ünal, G.G.; Süleymanoğlu, M.; Şen, F.; Açar, B.; Balcı, M.M. Left main coronary artery thrombosis
and acute anterior myocardial infarction related to energy drink. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015, 179, 66–67. [CrossRef]
57. Usman, A.; Jawaid, A. Hypertension in a young boy: An energy drink effect. BMC Res. Notes 2012, 5, 591. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
58. Uyanik, M.; Gedikli, O.; Yildirim, U. Energy Drink-Associated Cardiomyopathy after Excessive Consumption: A Case Report.
J. Tehran Univ. Heart Cent. 2021, 16, 119–122. [CrossRef]
59. Ward, A.E.; Lipshultz, S.E.; Fisher, S.D. Energy Drink–Induced Near-Fatal Ventricular Arrhythmia Prevented by an Intracardiac
Defibrillator Decades After Operative “Repair” of Tetralogy of Fallot. Am. J. Cardiol. 2014, 114, 1124–1125. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
60. Wilson, R.E.; Kado, H.S.; Samson, R.; Miller, A.B. A Case of Caffeine-Induced Coronary Artery Vasospasm of a 17-Year-Old Male.
Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 2012, 12, 175–179. [CrossRef]
61. Zacher, J.; May, E.; Horlitz, M.; Pingel, S. Binge drinking alcohol with caffeinated “energy drinks”, prolonged emesis and
spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A case report, review of the literature and postulation of a pathomechanism. Clin. Res.
Cardiol. 2018, 107, 975–979. [CrossRef]
62. Ibrahim, A.M.; Ali, M.; Al-Bast, B.; Bhandari, B.; Kulkarni, A. Energy drink consumption resulting in severe hypertriglyceridemia,
hyperglycemia, and acute pancreatitis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 2752. [CrossRef]
63. Al Yacoub, R.; Luczkiewicz, D.; Kerr, C. Acute kidney injury and hepatitis associated with energy drink consumption: A case
report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2020, 14, 23. [CrossRef]
64. Al-Tamimi, A.; Kassim, T.; Chandra, S. Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis With Energy Drinks Consumption: Rare but Definite
Association: 1442. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 113, S828. [CrossRef]
65. Apestegui, C.A.; Julliard, O.; Ciccarelli, O.; Duc, D.K.; Lerut, J. Energy drinks: Another red flag for the liver allograft. Liver Transpl.
2011, 17, 1117–1118. [CrossRef]
66. Garg, A.; Rodriguez, A.; Lewis, J.T.; Bansal, R.; Brahmbhatt, B. Energy Drinks: A Reversible Risk Factor for Atrophic Gastritis and
Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia. Cureus 2020, 12, e12298. [CrossRef]
67. Harb, J.N.; Taylor, Z.A.; Khullar, V.; Sattari, M. Rare cause of acute hepatitis: A common energy drink. BMJ Case Rep. 2016, 2016,
bcr2016216612. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
68. Huang, B.; Kunkel, D.; El Kabany, M. Acute Liver Failure Following One Year of Daily Consumption of a Sugar-Free Energy
Drink. ACG Case Rep. J. 2014, 1, 214–216. [CrossRef]
69. Randhawa, N.; Shah, M.; Spyratos, T. The Pain of Staying Alert: A Case Report and Literature Review on Energy Drink–Induced
Acute Pancreatitis. J. Investig. Med. High Impact Case Rep. 2022, 10, 23247096221104468. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
70. Shmelev, A.; Abdo, A.; Sachdev, S.; Shah, U.; Kowdley, G.C.; Cunningham, S.C. Energetic etiologies of acute pancreatitis: A report
of five case. World J. Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2015, 6, 243–248. [CrossRef]
71. Takahashi, K.; Tsukamoto, S.; Kakizaki, Y.; Saito, K.; Ohkohchi, N.; Hirayama, K. Hypercobalaminemia Induced by an Energy
Drink after Total Gastrectomy: A Case Report. J. Rural Med. 2013, 8, 181–185. [CrossRef]
72. Uwaifo, G.I. Beware Energy Drinks: A Case of a Toxic Triad Syndrome in a Diabetic Patient With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver
Disease. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 358, 304–311. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 2023, 15, 3922 29 of 31
73. Vivekanandarajah, A.; Ni, S.; Waked, A. Acute hepatitis in a woman following excessive ingestion of an energy drink: A case
report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2011, 5, 227. [CrossRef]
74. Casas-Gomez, C.; Muñoz-Molero, M.J.; Guerrero-Sánchez, R.; Martínez-León, F. Mania and energy drinks. Actas Esp. Psiquiatr.
2018, 46, 156–158.
75. Calabrò, R.S.; Italiano, D.; Gervasi, G.; Bramanti, P. Single tonic–clonic seizure after energy drink abuse. Epilepsy Behav. 2012, 23,
384–385. [CrossRef]
76. Cerimele, J.M.; Stern, A.P.; Jutras-Aswad, D. Psychosis Following Excessive Ingestion of Energy Drinks in a Patient With
Schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 2010, 167, 353-353. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
77. Cruzado, L.; Sánchez-Fernández, M.; Cortez-Vergara, C.; Rojas-Rojas, G. Mania induced by high content caffeinated energy
drinks. Actas Esp. Psiquiatr. 2014, 42, 259–262.
78. Görgülü, Y.; Taşdelen, Ö.; Sönmez, M.B.; Köse Çinar, R. A Case of Acute Psychosis Following Energy Drink Consumption. Noro.
Psikiyatr. Ars. 2014, 51, 79–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
79. Grant, R.A.; Cord, B.J.; Kuzomunhu, L.; Sheth, K.; Gilmore, E.; Matouk, C.C. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and severe,
catheter-induced vasospasm associated with excessive consumption of a caffeinated energy drink. Interv. Neuroradiol. 2016, 22,
674–678. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
80. Gupta, N.; Padidam, S.; Tewari, A. Acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN) related to energy drink consumption. BMJ Case Rep.
2019, 12, e232144. [CrossRef]
81. Hernandez-Huerta, D.; Martin-Larregola, M.; Gomez-Arnau, J.; Correas-Lauffer, J.; Dolengevich-Segal, H. Psychopathology
Related to Energy Drinks: A Psychosis Case Report. Case Rep. Psychiatry 2017, 2017, 5094608. [CrossRef]
82. Iyadurai, S.J.P.; Chung, S.S. New-onset seizures in adults: Possible association with consumption of popular energy drinks.
Epilepsy Behav. 2007, 10, 504–508. [CrossRef]
83. Kelsey, D.; Berry, A.J.; Swain, R.A.; Lorenz, S. A Case of Psychosis and Renal Failure Associated with Excessive Energy Drink
Consumption. Case Rep. Psychiatry 2019, 2019, 3954161. [CrossRef]
84. Butragueño Laiseca, L.; Toledo del Castillo, B.; Miranda Herrero, M.C. Bebidas enérgicas como desencadenante de crisis
convulsivas en pacientes pediátricos: A propósito de un caso. Neurología 2019, 34, 343–345. [CrossRef]
85. Menkes, D.B. Transient Psychotic Relapse Temporally Related to Ingestion of an “Energy Drink”. Med. J. Aust. 2011, 194, 206.
[CrossRef]
86. Norelli, L.J.; Xu, C. Manic Psychosis Associated With Ginseng: A Report of Two Cases and Discussion of the Literature. J. Diet.
Suppl. 2014, 12, 119–125. [CrossRef]
87. Pagano, C.W.; Wu, M.; Wu, L. Acute visual loss and intraretinal hemorrhages associated to energy drink consumption. Int.
Ophthalmol. 2017, 37, 1349–1351. [CrossRef]
88. Sharma, V. Red Bull and Mania. Ger. J. Psychiatry 2010, 13, 178–180.
89. Staikoglou, N.; Polanagnostaki, A.; Lamprou, V.; Chartampilas, E.; Pavlou, E.; Tegos, T.; Finitsis, S. Posterior cerebral artery
dissection after excessive caffeine consumption in a teenager. Radiol. Case Rep. 2022, 17, 2081–2084. [CrossRef]
90. Trabulo, D.; Marques, S.; Pedroso, E. Caffeinated energy drink intoxication. BMJ Case Rep. 2011, 2011, bcr0920103322. [CrossRef]
91. Yartsev, A.; Peisah, C. Caffeine-clozapine interaction associated with severe toxicity and multiorgan system failure: A case report.
BMC Psychiatry 2021, 21, 192. [CrossRef]
92. Greene, E.; Oman, K.; Lefler, K. Energy Drink–Induced Acute Kidney Injury. Ann. Pharmacother. 2014, 48, 1366–1370. [CrossRef]
93. Icin, T.; Medic-Stojanoska, M.; Ilic, T.; Kuzmanovic, V.; Vukovic, B.; Percic, I.; Kovacev-Zavisic, B. Multiple Causes of Hypona-
tremia: A Case Report. Med. Princ. Pract. 2017, 26, 292–295. [CrossRef]
94. Iyer, P.S.; Rishitha Yelisetti, R.; Miriyala, V.; Siddiqui, W.; Kaji, A. Remarkable Case of Rhabdomyolysis Associated with Ingestion
of Energy Drink ‘Neon Volt’. J. Community Hosp. Intern. Med. Perspect. 2016, 6, 32528. [CrossRef]
95. Schöffl, I.; Kothmann, J.F.; Schöffl, V.; Rupprecht, H.D.; Rupprecht, T. “Vodka Energy”: Too Much for the Adolescent Nephron?
Pediatrics 2011, 128, e227–e231. [CrossRef]
96. Tinawi, M. Severe Rhabdomyolysis Due to Strenuous Exercise With a Potential Role of a High-Caffeine Energy Drink. Cureus
2022, 14, e20867. [CrossRef]
97. West, N.J.; Thorpe, M. Neonatal hyperinsulinism secondary to maternal intake of high-sugar drinks. BMJ Case Rep. 2011, 2011,
bcr0320113990. [CrossRef]
98. Zekavat, O.R.; Fathpour, G.; Haghpanah, S.; Dehghani, S.J.; Zekavat, M.; Shakibazad, N. Acquired Vitamin K Deficiency as
Unusual Cause of Bleeding Tendency in Adults: A Case Report of a Nonhospitalized Student Presenting with Severe Menorrhagia.
Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 2017, 4239148. [CrossRef]
99. Gerqari, A.M.B.; Ferizi, M.; Halimi, S.; Daka, A.; Hapciu, S.; Begolli, I.M.; Begolli, M.; Gerqari, I.H. Erythema exsudativum
multiforme induced by a taurine-containing energy drink. Acta Dermatovenerol. Alp. Pannonica Adriat. 2016, 25, 83–84. [CrossRef]
100. Seung-Eun, L.; Suh-Young Eun-Jung, J.; Mi-Young, K.; Min-Suk, Y.; Yoon-Seok, C.; Sae-Hoon, K. A Case of Taurine-Containing
Drink Induced anaphylaxis. Asia Pac. Aller. 2013, 3, 70.
101. Wolk, B.J.; Ganetsky, M.; Babu, K.M. Toxicity of energy drinks. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2012, 24, 243–251. [CrossRef]
102. Gutiérrez-Hellín, J.; Varillas-Delgado, D. Energy Drinks and Sports Performance, Cardiovascular Risk, and Genetic Associations;
Future Prospects. Nutrients 2021, 13, 715. [CrossRef]
Nutrients 2023, 15, 3922 30 of 31
103. Schüttler, D.; Rudi, W.-S.; Bauer, A.; Hamm, W.; Brunner, S. Impact of energy drink versus coffee consumption on periodic
repolarization dynamics: An interventional study. Eur. J. Nutr. 2022, 61, 2847–2851. [CrossRef]
104. Lévy, S.; Santini, L.; Capucci, A.; Oto, A.; Santomauro, M.; Riganti, C.; Raviele, A.; Cappato, R. European Cardiac Arrhythmia
Society Statement on the cardiovascular events associated with the use or abuse of energy drinks. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol.
2019, 56, 99–115. [CrossRef]
105. Ehlers, A.; Marakis, G.; Lampen, A.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.I. Risk assessment of energy drinks with focus on cardiovascular parameters
and energy drink consumption in Europe. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 130, 109–121. [CrossRef]
106. Wikoff, D.; Welsh, B.T.; Henderson, R.; Brorby, G.P.; Britt, J.; Myers, E.; Goldberger, J.; Lieberman, H.R.; O’Brien, C.; Peck, J.; et al.
Systematic review of the potential adverse effects of caffeine consumption in healthy adults, pregnant women, adolescents, and
children. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 109 Pt 1, 585–648. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
107. Mangi, M.A.; Rehman, H.; Rafique, M.; Illovsky, M. Energy Drinks and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Review of Current
Literature. Cureus 2017, 9, e1322. [CrossRef]
108. Protano, C.; Valeriani, F.; De Giorgi, A.; Marotta, D.; Ubaldi, F.; Napoli, C.; Liguori, G.; Spica, V.R.; Vitali, M.; Gallè, F. Consumption
patterns of energy drinks in university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition 2023, 107, 111904. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
109. Cappelletti, S.; Piacentino, D.; Fineschi, V.; Frati, P.; Cipolloni, L.; Aromatario, M. Caffeine-Related Deaths: Manner of Deaths and
Categories at Risk. Nutrients 2018, 10, 611. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
110. Frost, L.; Vestergaard, P.; Mosekilde, L. Hyperthyroidism and risk of atrial fibrillation or flutter: A population-based study. ACC
Curr. J. Rev. 2004, 13, 13. [CrossRef]
111. Lorist, M.M.; Tops, M. Caffeine, fatigue, and cognition. Brain Cogn. 2003, 53, 82–94. [CrossRef]
112. Morgan, J.C.; Sethi, K.D. Drug-induced tremors. Lancet Neurol. 2005, 4, 866–876. [CrossRef]
113. Epilepsy Foundation. Energy Drinks May Increase the Risk of Seizures According to a New Study. Available online: https:
//www.epilepsy.com/stories/energy-drinks-may-increase-risk-seizures-according-new-study (accessed on 17 April 2023).
114. Rossi, S.; De Chiara, V.; Musella, A.; Mataluni, G.; Sacchetti, L.; Siracusano, A.; Bernardi, G.; Usiello, A.; Centonze, D. Effects of
caffeine on striatal neurotransmission: Focus on cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010, 54, 525–531. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
115. Herrick, J.; Shecterle, L.M.; St Cyr, J.A. D-ribose--an additive with caffeine. Med. Hypotheses. 2009, 72, 499–500. [CrossRef]
116. Persad, L.A.B. Energy Drinks and the Neurophysiological Impact of Caffeine. Front. Neurosci. 2011, 5, 116. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
117. Richards, G.; Smith, A.P.; Distelberg, B.J.; Staack, A.; Elsen, K.D.; Sabaté, J. A Review of Energy Drinks and Mental Health, with a
Focus on Stress, Anxiety, and Depression. J. Caffeine Res. 2016, 6, 49–63. [CrossRef]
118. Rizkallah, G.S.; Mertens, M.K.; Brown, M.L. Should liver enzymes be checked in a patient taking niacin? J. Fam. Pract. 2005,
54, 265–282.
119. Huang, K.-H.; Chang, C.-C.; Ho, J.-D.; Lu, R.-H.; Tsai, L.H. Role of taurine on acid secretion in the rat stomach. J. Biomed. Sci.
2011, 18, 11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
120. Meng, W.-J.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Z.-G. Anaphylactic shock and lethal anaphylaxis caused by compound amino acid solution, a nutritional
treatment widely used in China. Amino Acids 2012, 42, 2501–2505. [CrossRef]
121. Salih, N.A.; Abdul-Sadaand, I.H.; Abdulrahman, N.R. Histopathological effect of energy drinks (Red Bull) on Brain, Liver, Kidney,
and Heart in Rabbits. Med. J. Babylon 2018, 15, 16. [CrossRef]
122. Nieradko-Iwanicka, B.; Pietraszek, D.; Pośnik, K. Prolonged consumption of energy drinks does not affect the processes of
memory, and increases the activity of transaminases, and cholesterol concentration—Animal model study results. Fam. Med.
Prim. Care Rev. 2016, 3, 313–316. [CrossRef]
123. Sadowska, J. Evaluation of the effect of consuming an energy drink on the concentration of glucose and triacylglycerols and on
fatty tissue deposition. A model study. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2012, 11, 311–318.
124. Rasheed, A.; Aslam, I.; Tafweez, R.; Kiani, M.R.B.; Ameer, M.K.; Saeed, A.A. Histological consequences of consumption of energy
drink on renal tubules. Pak. Armed Forces Med. J. 2021, 71, 1736–1740. [CrossRef]
125. Abonar, M.; Aboraya, A.; Elbakary, N.; Elwan, W. Effect of Energy Drink on the Pancreas of Adult Male Albino Rat and the
Possible Protective Role of Avocado Oil. Histological and Immunohistochemical Study. Egypt. J. Histol. 2021, 42, 386–403.
[CrossRef]
126. Rehman, F.; Islam, Z.U.; Haq, S.U.; Faisal, L.; Rehman, S.; Kumar, S. Morphometric Study on the Energy Drink Induced
Pancreatitis on Wistar Albino Rats. J. Dow Univ. Health Sci. 2020, 14, 102–106. [CrossRef]
127. Haroun, H.; Mohamed, E.; El Shahat, A.E.R.; Labib, H.; Atef, M. Adverse effects of energy drink on rat pancreas and the
therapeutic role of each of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and Nigella Sativa oil. Folia Morphol. 2020, 79, 272–279.
[CrossRef]
128. Kassab, A.A.; Tawfik, S. Effect of a caffeinated energy drink and its withdrawal on the submandibular salivary gland of adult
male albino rats: A histological and immunohistochemical study. Egypt. J. Histol. 2018, 41, 11–26. [CrossRef]
129. Ellermann, C.; Hakenes, T.; Wolfes, J.; Wegner, F.K.; Willy, K.; Leitz, P.; Rath, B.; Eckardt, L.; Frommeyer, G. Cardiovascular
risk of energy drinks: Caffeine and taurine facilitate ventricular arrhythmias in a sensitive whole-heart model. J. Cardiovasc.
Electrophysiol. 2022, 33, 1290–1297. [CrossRef]
Nutrients 2023, 15, 3922 31 of 31
130. Demirel, A.; Başgöze, S.; Çakıllı, K.; Aydın, U.; Şentürk, G.E.; Diker, V.O.; Ertürk, M. Histopathological Changes in the Myocardium
Caused by Energy Drinks and Alcohol in the Mid-term and Their Effects on Skeletal Muscle Following Ischemia-reperfusion in a
Rat Model. Anatol. J. Cardiol. 2023, 27, 12–18. [CrossRef]
131. Díaz, A.; Treviño, S.; Guevara, J.; Muñoz-Arenas, G.; Brambila, E.; Espinosa, B.; Moreno-Rodríguez, A.; Lopez-Lopez, G.; Peña-
Rosas, U.; Venegas, B.; et al. Energy Drink Administration in Combination with Alcohol Causes an Inflammatory Response and
Oxidative Stress in the Hippocampus and Temporal Cortex of Rats. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 8725354. [CrossRef]
132. Ulenius, L.; Adermark, L.; Söderpalm, B.; Ericson, M. Energy drink constituents (caffeine and taurine) selectively potentiate
ethanol-induced locomotion in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2019, 187, 172795. [CrossRef]
133. Ugwuja, E. Biochemical Effects of Energy Drinks Alone or in Combination with Alcohol in Normal Albino Rats. Adv. Pharm. Bull.
2014, 4, 69–74. [CrossRef]
134. Krahe, T.E.; Filgueiras, C.C.; Quaresma, R.d.S.; Schibuola, H.G.; Abreu-Villaça, Y.; Manhães, A.C.; Ribeiro-Carvalho, A. Energy
drink enhances the behavioral effects of alcohol in adolescent mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2017, 651, 102–108. [CrossRef]
135. Reis, R.; Charehsaz, M.; Sipahi, H.; Ekici, A.I.; Macit, Ç.; Akkaya, H.; Aydın, A. Energy Drink Induced Lipid Peroxidation
and Oxidative Damage in Rat Liver and Brain When Used Alone or Combined with Alcohol. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 1037–1043.
[CrossRef]
136. Nasi, M.; De Gaetano, A.; Carnevale, G.; Bertoni, L.; Selleri, V.; Zanini, G.; Pisciotta, A.; Caramaschi, S.; Reggiani Bonetti,
L.; Farinetti, A.; et al. Effects of Energy Drink Acute Consumption in Gastrointestinal Tract of Rats. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1928.
[CrossRef]
137. Elçi, E.; Elçi, G.G.; Çim, N.; Aras, I.; Sayan, S.; Yıldızhan, R. Energy drinks may affect the ovarian reserve and serum anti-mullerian
hormone levels in a rat model. J. Turk. Soc. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 18, 23–29. [CrossRef]
138. Oyelowo, T.O.; Awosika, O.I.; Adesina, T.H. Comparative assessment of artificial and natural energy drinks in the epididymal
and testicular milieu. Stud. Univ. Babeş-Bolyai Biol. 2022, 67, 15–33. [CrossRef]
139. Al-Basher, G.I.; Aljabal, H.; Almeer, R.S.; Allam, A.A.; Mahmoud, A.M. Perinatal exposure to energy drink induces oxidative
damage in the liver, kidney and brain, and behavioral alterations in mice offspring. BioMedicine 2018, 102, 798–811. [CrossRef]
140. Posokhov, Y.O.; Tkachenko, A.S.; Nakonechna, O.A.; Onishchenko, A.I.; Korniyenko, Y.M.; Tkachenko, M.O. Experimental study
of erythrocyte membranes in rats orally exposed to caffeinated energy drinks by fluorescent probe technique. Stud. Univ. Vasile
Goldiş 2019, 29, 129–133.
141. Turillazzi, E.; Di Paolo, M.; Neri, M.; Riezzo, I.; Fineschi, V. A theoretical timeline for myocardial infarction: Immunohistochemical
evaluation and western blot quantification for Interleukin-15 and Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 as very early markers. J. Transl.
Med. 2014, 12, 188. [CrossRef]
142. Aguilar, F.; Charrondiere, U.R.; Dusemund, B.; Galtier, P.; Gilbert, J.; Gott, D.M.; Grilli, S.; Guertler, R.; Kass, G.E.N.; Koenig,
J.; et al. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food. The use of taurine and
D-glucurono-gamma-lactone as constituents of the so-called “energy” drinks. EFSA J. 2009, 935, 1–31.
143. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and Allergies (NDA). Scientific opinion on Dietary Reference Values for vitamin A.
EFSA J. 2015, 13, 4028. [CrossRef]
144. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
Highly Concentrated Caffeine in Dietary Supplements: Guidance for Industry; FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2018.
145. Maiese, A.; La Russa, R.; Del Fante, Z.; Turillazzi, E.; David, M.C.; Frati, P.; Fineschi, V. Massive Œ ≤ 1-Adrenergic Receptor
Reaction Explains Irreversible Acute Arrhythmia in a Fatal Case of Acute Pure Caffeine Intoxication. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 2021, 21,
88–92. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.