FullCourseTeachingMaterial
FullCourseTeachingMaterial
The way organizations are managed is changing by necessity. Globalization is now an accepted
fact of everyday life. To remain or become competitive, managers in the developed countries
have to restructure and rethink how people are managed. In the new global economy that is
slowly emerging, human resources, information technology, speedy decision making, strategic
alliances, use of the skills of a diverse workforce, and knowledge of how to combine
individualism and teamwork can provide competitive edge opportunities for small entrepreneurs,
mid-size companies, or large conglomerate multinational firms. The application of effective
management principles, programs, and techniques in organizations must become commonplace
regardless of industries product.
There are several definitions of Management, but they all are fundamentally the same. Among
the many, some are:
Management is the process of coordinating all resources through the five major functions of
planning, organizing, staffing, directing /leading and controlling to achieve organizational
goals/desired objectives. That is, it is the process of achieving organizational goals through
engaging in the five major functions of planning, organizing, staffing, directing/leading and
controlling.
In the above definition there are three key concepts
Coordination of all resources: managers should coordinate the resources of an organization.
These resources may be human or non-human.
The five managerial functions: To coordinate the resources of an organization a manager should
employ/use the five managerial functions.
Objectives: Is the reason for the establishment of organizations and management is useful for
achieving these goals. Managing/management is concerned with productivity: effectiveness and
efficiency. There are points to be meet, targets to be shot or places to be reached. All
organizations establish a variety of goals and direct their energies and resources to achieve them.
Profit oriented business e.g. ROI goals
Hospital e.g. Patient care, Educational institution e.g. Teaching, research and community service.
All organizations also have resources that can be used to meet these objectives. Such resources
can be classified into: human and non-human, and management is, then, the force that unifies
these resources. It is the process of bringing them together and coordinating them to help
accomplish organizational goals.
Management is the art of getting things done through other people by making the atmosphere
conducive for others. It is the process of getting things done through others, and their process
puts emphasis on both the objectives to be attained and the people who will be pursuing them.
An effective manager focuses on both work and people. The job of every manager is to achieve
organizational goals through the combined efforts of people. Management is the utilization of
scientifically derived principles to examine and improve collective efforts or production.
Management applies to any kind of organization, to managers at all organizational levels.
Without management, virtually no business could survive. Management increases the values of
our resources.
Management is the process of achieving organizational goals through engaging in the five major
functions of planning, organizing, leading, staffing and controlling.
This definition recognizes that
Management is an ongoing activity
Entails reaching important goals, and
Involves knowing how to perform the five major functions of management.
Managers: are those persons in the position of authority who make decisions to commit (use)
their resources and the resources of others towards the achievement of organizational objectives.
Everybody is the manager of her time, energy and talents. Organization is a group of two or
more people brought together to achieve common stated objectives. Or a collection of two or
more persons engaged in a systematic effort to produce goods and/or services.
Managerial Functions
Regardless of the type of firm and the organizational level, all managers perform certain basic
functions. These managerial functions are planning, organizing, staffing, directing/leading and
controlling.
PLANNING is making decisions today about future actions.
It involves selecting missions and objectives and the actions to achieve them;
It requires decision making. That is, choosing future courses of action from among alternatives.
No real plan exists until a decision – a commitment of human or material resources – has been
made. Before a decision is made, all we have is a planning study, an analysis or a proposal, but
not a real plan.
Planning bridges the gap between where we are to where we want to be in a desired future.
Planning identifies goals and alternatives. It maps out courses of action that will commit
individuals, departments and the entire organization for days, months and years to come.
Planning is the first managerial function that all managers engaged in because it lays the
groundwork for other managerial functions.
People currently not trained by management get themselves in managerial positions and earn
their livelihood, and the most common path to become successful manager involves a
combination of education and experience.
Management is needed to coordinate and direct the efforts of individuals, groups and the
entire organization to achieve desired objectives. Management is responsible for the success
or failure of an organization. That is, when an organization fails it is because of poor
management, and when an organization succeeds it is because of good management.
Whenever and wherever there is a group work having stated objectives, management is
needed to direct and coordinate their efforts. Without management effort will be wasted.
Levels of Management
Is management the same throughout an organization? Yes and No
Yes: because all managers perform the five managerial functions.
No: because despite the fact that they perform all managerial functions, they perform it with
different emphasis and scope.
Managers all perform the same management functions but with different emphases because of
their position in the organization. Although all managers may perform the same basic duties and
play similar roles, the nature and scope of their activities differ. These differences are the base
for the classification of managers. Managers can be divided based on two criteria. These are:
Levels of management (vertical difference)
Scope of responsibilities (horizontal difference)
however, there are three distinct levels. How these levels are distinguished? What functions are
performed at each level? And the reporting relationships are some of the issues to be addressed.
Based on levels of management or hierarchy we do have three types of managers. A manager’s
assigned duties and the authority needed to fulfill those duties are what determine management
level.
Top Level Managers: Top-level managers are managers who are at the top of the organizational
hierarchy and are responsible for the entire organization. They are usually few in number and
include the organization’s most important managers - the CEO or the president and her
immediate subordinates usually called vice-presidents. But the actual title may vary from
organization to organization. They are few in number because of the nature of the work they
perform and economic problem. They deal with the big picture, not with the nitty-gritty. They
are responsible for the overall management of the organization. They establish companywide
objectives or goals and organizational policies. Furthermore, top management:
Develop overall structure of the organization.
Direct the organization in accordance with the environment.
Develop policy in areas of Equal Employment Opportunity and employee development.
Represent the organization in community affairs, business deals, and government
negotiations.
Spent much of their time in planning and dealing with middle level managers and other
subordinates.
Work long hours and spend much of their time in meetings and on telephone.
Are persons who are responsible for making decisions and formulating policies that affect
all aspects of the firm’s operations.
Provide overall leadership of the organization towards accomplishment of its objectives.
They are responsible for the organization because objectives are established and policies
are formulated at the top.
Top-level managers take the credit or blame for organizational success and failures
respectively.
Middle Level Managers: Middle level managers occupy a position in an organization that is
above first-line management and below top management. They interpret and implement top
management directives and forward messages to and from first-line management.
Regardless of their title, they are subordinates are managers. Often coordinate and supervise the
activities of lower level managers. Receive broad/overall strategies from top managers and
translate it into specific objectives and plans for First-Line Mangers/operating managers. Are
responsible for the proper implementation of policies and strategies defined by top level
managers. They interpret and implement top management directives and forward messages to
and from first-line management.
Their principal responsibility is to direct the activity that implement the policies of the
organization.
E.g. Academic deans, Division Head, Plant managers, Army captain, First Level Supervisory
Level managers Are those at the operating level or at the last level of management;
Their subordinates are non managers.
They are responsible for overseeing and coordinating the work of operating employees.
Assign operating employees to specific tasks.
Are managers on which management depends for the execution of its plan since their job
is to deal with employees who actually produce the organization’s goods and services to
fulfill the plan?
Are directly responsible for the production of goods and services.
Motivate subordinates to change or improve their performance. Serve as a bridge
between managers and non-managers. Spent much of their time in leading and little in
planning.
Are in charge of carrying out the day to day activities within the various departments to
ensure that short term goals are met.
E.g. Department Heads, supervisory personnel, Sales managers, Loan officers, Foreman.
Are often neither fish nor fowl – neither management nor labor because they feel great deal of
empathy for their subordinates (which stems from close personal contact and the fact that most
supervisors have come up from the ranks of labor) and they are there to reflect the company’s
point of view to their subordinates. And that is why First-Line Mangers are called “People in the
Middle”.
All managers carry out managerial functions. However, the time spent for each function varies
according to their managerial hierarchy. Top-level managers spend more time on planning and
organizing than lower-level managers. Leading, on the other hand, takes a great deal of time for
first-line managers. The difference in time spent on staffing and controlling varies only slightly
for managers at various levels.
Top
Fig. 1.1 The relative importance of the managerial functions at different levels
Types of Managers based on scope of responsibility
Based on the scope of responsibility/activities they manage, managers are divided into two:
Functional Managers: Functional managers are managers who are responsible for a department
that performs a single functional task and has employees with similar training and skills.
Supervise employees (managers + workers) with specialized skills in specific areas of operations
such as accounting, payroll, finance, marketing, production, or sales etc. They are responsible for
only one organizational activity; i.e. their responsibility is limited to their
specialization/specification.
General Managers: General Managers are managers who are responsible for several departments
that perform different functions. They are responsible for the entire operations of the
organization without being specific. Oversee a complex unit, such as a company, a subsidiary, or
an independent operating division. She will be responsible for all activities of that unit, such as
its production, marketing, sales and finance. A small company may have only one general
manager – its president or executive vice president – but a large organization may have several,
each at the head of a relatively independent division.
Managerial Roles
Role is an organized set of behaviors that is associated with a particular office or position.
It is a pattern of behavior expected by others from a person occupying a certain position in an
organizational hierarchy.
A role is any one of several behaviors a manager displays as she functions in the organization
When a manager tries to carry out the management functions, she must behave in a certain way –
to fill certain role. Managerial roles represent specific tasks that managers undertake to
ultimately accomplish the five managerial functions. Factors which affect managerial roles are:
manager’s formal job description, and the values and expectations of other managers,
subordinates and peers.
Henry Mintzberg identified 10 managerial roles which are in turn grouped into three categories:
Interpersonal, Informational and Decisional Roles.
Interpersonal Roles: involve developing and maintaining positive relationships with
significant others in the organization. It is communication oriented. It includes:
Figurehead Role: managers perform symbolic duties of a legal or social nature. The
manager is the head of her work unit, be it division, section or department. Because of the
“lead person” position the manager represents her work unit at ceremonial or symbolic
functions. The top level managers represent the company legally and socially to those outside
of the organization. The superior represents the work group to higher management and higher
management to the work group. E.g. Signing documents, presiding at a ceremonial event,
greeting visitors, attending a subordinate’s weeding, taking a customer to lunch, university
president hands out a diploma for graduates – in all these cases the manager is representing
her organization.
Leadership Role: The manager is the environment creator – she makes the environment
conducive for work by improving working conditions, reducing conflicts, providing feedback
for performance and encouraging growth. (Virtually all managerial operations involving
subordinates are examples for a leadership role). The leader builds relationship and
communicates with employees, motivates and coaches them. As a leader, the manager is
responsible for hiring, training, motivating and encouraging employees/subordinates. The
leadership role is evident in the interpersonal relationship between manager and her
subordinates.
Liaison Role: The liaison maintains a network of contacts outside the work unit to obtain
information. The manager serves as a link between the organization and the informants who
provide favors and information. She fulfills her role through community service, conferences,
social events, etc; participation is meetings with representatives of other divisions. Refers to
dealing with the member of the organization superiors, subordinates, peer level managers in
other departments, staff specialists and outside contacts such as clients. The top management
uses their role to gain favors and information, while the superiors use it to maintain the
routine flow of work.
Informational Roles; focuses on the transmission of important information to and from
internal and external sources. It involves the following activities
Monitor role: is also called information gathering role. This role refers to seeking, receiving,
screening and getting information. The manager is constantly monitoring the environment to
determine what is going on. The monitor seeks internal and external information about issues
that can affect the organization. She seeks and receives wide variety of special information to
develop through understanding of the organization and the environment. Information is
gathered from news reports, trade publications, magazines, clients, associates, and a host of
similar sources, attending seminars and exhibitions.
Disseminator Role: what does the manager do with the information collected? As the
disseminator, the manager passes on to subordinates some of the information that would not
ordinarily be accessible to them. After the information has been gathered (by monitor role), it
has to be disseminated to superiors, subordinates, peers and other concerned clients. The
types of information to be forwarded to members could be facts, opinions, interpretations,
and influences.
Spokesperson/representative Role: the spokesperson transmits information about the
organization to outsiders. The manager is the person who speaks for her work unit to people
outside the work unit. One aspect of their role is to keep superiors well informed and a
second aspect is to communicate outside the organization like press, government agencies,
customers and labor unions. Although the roles of spokesperson and figurehead are similar,
there is one basic difference between them. When a manager acts as a figurehead, the
manager’s presence is as a symbol of the organization, whereas, in the spokesman role, the
manager carries information and communicates it to others in a formal sense.
Thus, the manager seeks information in the monitor role, communicates it internally in the
disseminator role and transmits it externally in the spokesperson role. The three informational
roles, then, combine to provide important information required in the decisional roles.
Decisional Roles: involve making significant decisions that affect the organization.
Effective managers are essential to the performance of all organizations, whether they have the
ability to plan, organize, staff, lead and control business operations effectively can determine a
firm’s ultimate success or failure.
Management success depends both on: a fundamental understanding of the principles of
management and the application of technical, human and conceptual skills.
Modern businesses are dynamic and complex, and competition in the market place is fierce.
Consequently, managers must be highly skilled to succeed. The skills managers need can be
classified as technical skill, human Relations skill, and conceptual skill
Technical Skills – involve process or technique, knowledge and proficiency. It is the ability
to use the tools, procedures, or techniques of a specialized field. It includes mastery of the
methods, techniques, and equipment involved in specific functions, such as engineering,
manufacturing, or finance. Technical skill also includes specialized knowledge, analytical
ability, and the competent use of tools and techniques to solve problems in that specific
discipline. Is specialized knowledge and ability that can be applied to specific tasks. Is a skill
that reflects both an understanding of and a proficiency in a specialized field.
Technical skills are most important at the lower levels of management. It becomes less important
as we move up the chain of command because when they supervise the others (workers), they
have to show how to do the work.
E.g. A surgeon, an engineer, a musician, a quality controller or an accountant all have technical
skill in their respective areas.
Human Relations or Interpersonal Skill – the ability to interact effectively with people. It is
the ability to work with, understand and motivate other people, either as individuals or as
groups. Managers need enough of human relationships skill to be able to participate
effectively and lead groups. These skills are demonstrated in the way a manager relates to
other people, including the way she motivates, facilitates, coordinates, leads, communicates,
and resolves conflicts. A manager with human skills allows subordinates to express
themselves without fear of ridicule and encourages participation. A manager with human
skills likes other people and is liked by them. This skill is a reflection of the manager’s
leadership ability.
Managers who lack human skills often are abrupt, critical, and unsympathetic toward others. The
results are often abrupt, critical, and unsympathetic response from workers to management.
Because all work is done when people work together, human relation skills are equally important
at all levels of management.
Conceptual skills – involve the formulation of ideas. It refers to the ability to see the big
picture – to view the organization from a broad perspective and to see the interrelations
among its components. It includes recognizing how the various jobs in an organization
depend on one another and how a change in any one part affects all the others. It also
involves the manager’s ability to understand how a change in any given part can affect the
whole organization, ability to understand abstract relationships, solve problems creatively,
and develop ideas.
Conceptual skills are more important in strategic (long range) planning; therefore, they are more
important to top-executives than middle managers and supervisors.
Although all three of these skills are essential to effective management, their relative importance
to specific manager depends on her rank in the organization. Technical skill is of greatest
importance at supervisory level; it becomes less important as we move up the chain of command.
Even though human skill is equally important at every level of the organization, it is probably
most important at the lower level, where the greatest number of management–subordinate
interactions is likely to take place.
On the Other hand, the importance of conceptual skill increases as we rise in the rank of
management. The higher the manager is in the hierarchy, the more she will be involved in the
broad, long term decisions that affect large parts of the organization. For top management, which
is responsible for the entire organization, conceptual skill is probably the most important skill of
all.
Important: Technical skill deals with things, human skill concerns people and conceptual skill
has to do with ideas.
Middle
First-line
management stops’. This underlines the importance of making managerial decisions in the
absence of sufficient data and information by using the decision maker’s common sense.
Universality Of Management
Regardless of title, position, or management level, all managers do the same job. They execute
the five managerial functions and work through and with others to set and achieve organizational
goals. Managers are the same whether the organization is private or public, profit making or non-
profit making, manufacturing or service giving, and industrial or small firms. Hence,
management is universal for the following reasons.
All managers perform the five managerial functions even if with different emphasis.
It is applicable for all human efforts; be it business, non-business, governmental, private. It is
useful from individual to institutional efforts.
Management utilizes scientifically derived operational principles.
All managers operate in organizations with specific objectives.
Management, in all organizations, helps to achieve organizational objectives.
In sum, management theories and principles have universal application in all kinds of organized
and purposeful activity and at all levels of management.
Chapter Two: The Planning Functions
Introduction:
Planning is the most important function of management. An organization can succeed in
effective utilization of its resources when its management decides in advance its objectives, and
methods of achieving them. Without this purposive and coordinated effort the results are chaos,
confusion, and wastage of resources. Planning involves determination of objectives, formulation
of programs and courses of action for their attainment, development of schedules and timing of
action and assignment of responsibilities for their implementation.
Planning encompasses defining the organization’s objectives or goals, establishing an overall
strategy, and developing a comprehensive hierarchy of plans to integrate and coordinate. It is
concerned with ends (What is to be done) and with means (how it is to be done).
2.1 Nature and Importance of Planning
Planning is ever manager’s job: Before managers can organize, lead, or control, they must make
the plans that give purpose and direction to the organization-deciding what needs to be done,
when and how it needs to be done, and who is to do it- for example, plant managers must plan
how their facilities are going to be used, how many of what products to make, and when to make
them. Marketing managers must plan how to introduce products, what distribution channels to
use, and how to price the products. Even financial managers must plan how to structure the debt
and equity of the firm and how o budget and spend resources. The need for planning exists at all
levels and actually increases at higher levels, where it has the greatest potential impact on the
organization’s success.
We can highlight the essential nature of planning as follows:-
1. The Contribution of Planning to Purpose and Objectives:-Every plan and its supporting plans
in an organization should contribute to the achievement of organizational purpose and objectives.
Planning is justified when it enables to achieve the objectives and purpose of an organization.
2. Primacy of Planning: - The primacy of planning means that planning, as a managerial
function, precedes all other managerial functions. Since the other managerial functions are
performed to facilitate the achievement of goals that are set in the planning process, planning
logically precedes ass other managerial functions. Although planning proceeds, in practice, all
managerial functions intermesh as a single system of action. Planning is unique in that it involves
establishing the objectives necessary for all group effort.
3. The pervasiveness of planning: - It means that planning is the function of all managers,
regardless of the levels to which they belong. Although planning is performed by every manager
the scope and its importance varies from level to level. The authority that a person possesses
determines the scope and breadth of the plane that he makes.
4. Efficiency of plans: - Plan formulation and implementation involves cost. This cost should not
exceed the benefits to be obtained from the implemented goods. Plans should achieve objectives
with a minimum cost.
The efficiency of a plan is measured by the amount it contributes to the achievement of purpose
and objectives as offset by the costs and unsought consequences of formulating and
implementing the plan. Plans are efficient if they achieve their purpose neither at a reasonable
cost when cost is measured nor only in terms of time or money or production but also in terms of
individual and group satisfaction.
Importance of planning:
The major uses of planning function are as follows
Minimizes risk and uncertainty:-By providing a more rational, fact –based procedure for making
decisions, planning allows managers and organizations to minimize risk and uncertainty.
Leads to success:-Planning does not guarantee success, but studies have shown, often things
being equal ,companies which plan not only outperform the non-planners also out perform their
own past results.
Focuses attention on the organization’s goal: - Planning helps the manager to focus attention on
the organization’s goals and activities. This makes it easier to apply and coordinate the resources
of the organization more efficiently. The whole organization is forced to embrace identical goals
and elaborate in achieving them.
Facilitate control:-In planning, the manager gets goals and develops plans to accomplish these
goals. These goals and plans then become standards or benchmarks against which performance
can be measured. The function of control is to ensure the activities conform to the plans. Thus,
controls can be exercised only if there are plans.
of uncertainties, the manager must make certain assumptions about it in order to plan
properly. These assumptions are based on forecasts of the future.
Establishing objectives:-The next step in planning is to establish objectives for the entire
enterprise and then for each subordinate work unit. This is to be done for the long term as
well as for the short range. Objectives specify the expected results and indicate the end points
of what is to be done, where the primary emphasis is to be placed, and what is to be
accomplished by the network of strategies, policies, procedures, rules, budgets and programs.
Determine alternative courses of action: The fourth step in planning is to search for and
examine alternative course of action, especially those not immediately apparent. There is
seldom a plan for which reasonable alternative do not exist, and quite often an alternative that
is not obvious proves to be the best. The more common problem is not finding alternatives
but reducing the number of alternatives so that the most promising may be analyzed.
Evaluating alternative course of action:-After seeking out alternative courses and examining
their strong and weak points, the next step is to evaluate the alternatives by weighing them in
light of premises and goals. One course may appear to be the most profitable, but it may
require large cash out lay and have a slow pay back; another may look less profitable but
may involve less risk; still another may better suit the company’s long –range objectives.
Selecting Course of Action:-This is the point at which the plan is adopted-the real point of
decision making. Occasionally, an analysis and evaluation of alternative courses will disclose
that two or more are advisable, and the manager may decide to follow several courses rather
than the one best curse,
Formulating Derivative Plans:-When a decision is made, planning is seldom complete, and a
seventh step is indicated. Derivative plans are almost invariably required to support the basic
plan.
Numbering plans by Budgeting:-After decisions are made and plans are set, the final step in
giving them meaning, as was indicated in the discussion of type’s plants, is to number them
by converting them into budgets. The overall budgets of an enterprise represent the sum total
of income and expenses, with resultant profit or surplus, and the budgets of major balance
sheet items such as cash and capital expenditures. Each department or program of a business
or some other enterprise can have its own budgets, usually of expenses and capital
expenditures, which tie into the overall budget. If done well, budgets become a means of
adding together the various plans and also set important standards against which planning
progress can be measured.
Implementing the plan After the optimum alternative has been selected, the manager needs to
develop an action plan to implement it. The manager must decide these issues: both human
and material, will the tasks be initiated and completed? What resources, both human and
material. Will be available for the process? How will the plan he evaluated? What reporting
procedures are to be used? What type and degree of authority will be granted to achieve these
ends?
Controlling and evaluating the results: Once the plan is implemented, the manager must
monitor the progress that is being made, evaluate the reported results, and make any
modifications necessary. The environment that a plan is constructed in is constantly
changing, so the plans may have to be modified. Or modification maybe required because a
plan was not quite “perfect” when it was implemented.
geared to optimize strategic goal achievement, given available environmental and internal
conditions. Strategic management is oriented toward reaching long-term goals, weighs important
environmental elements, considers major internal characteristics of the organization, and
involves developing specific strategies. Therefore, strategic management process encompasses a
major part of the planning process.
d. Policies: - A policy is a general guide line for decision making. It sets up boundaries around
decisions, including those that can be made and eliminating those that cannot.
In this way, it channels the thinking of organization members so that it is consistent with
organizational objectives. Some policies deal with very important matters such as those requiring
strict sanitary conditions where food or drugs are produced or packaged.
e. procedures:- Policies are carried out by means of more detailed guidelines called standard
Procedures.. A procedure provides a detailed set of instructions for performing a sequence of
actions that occurs often or regularly. For example, to handle orders involves the sales
department the finance department, the accounting department, the production department and
traffic department they show the sequence of activities. They are guides to action rather than
thinking. They tell us steps that should be followed to undertake the activities-the chronological
sequence of activities to be taken.
f. Methods: - It is even more detailed than a procedure. Where a procedure shows a series of
steps to be taken a method is only concerned with a single operation with one particular step. It
tells exactly how a particular step is to be performed.
g. Rules: - They spell out specific required or non required actions allowing no discretion
(freedom). They are plans which tell us the actions required and non- required and they compel.
They tell us what we should do or should not do. Example, No smoking, No personal phone
calls, No unauthorized personnel.
2. Single- use Plans: - Single use plans are detailed courses of action that probably will not be
repeated in the same form in the future. They are plans which are prepared for a particular
situation. For example, a rapidly expanding firm, panning to set up a new ware house, will need
a specific single-use plan for that project even though it has established a number of other
warehouses in the past. It will not be able to use an existing ware house plan, because the
projected warehouse presents unique requirements of location, construction costs, labour
availability, zoning restrictions, and so forth. The major type of single use plans include:
c. Short range plans: - They are plans that are not prepared separately; they are complementary
of long range plans.
They constitute the steps towards the implementation of long rage plans. They deal with the
immediate future actions. Often short- range plans are made without reference to long-range
plans. This is plainly a serious error. The importance of inter-grating the two types can hardly be
overemphasized, and no short-run plan should be made unless it contributes to the achievements
of the relevant long range plan. Many of the wastes of planning arise from decisions on
immediate situations that fail to consider their effect on more remote objectives. Responsible
managers should continually scrutinize immediate decisions to ascertain whether they contribute
to long range programs and subordinate managers should be regularly briefed on company long-
range plans so that they will make consistent short- range decisions. It is for easier to do this than
to correct inconsistencies, especially since short-term commitments fend to engender further
commitments along the same line.
Plans based on scope or breadth
We can classify plans in to three. These are:
a) Strategic planning: - It is the process of analyzing and deciding on the organization’s mission,
objectives, major course of actions or strategies and major resource allocations. It deals with
broad issues and performed by top level managers. Its important characteristic is that it is general
plan. It is a long-range planning that focuses on the organization as a whole. Managers consider
the organization as a total unit and ask themselves what must be done in the long-term to attain
organizational goals. It tells managers in broad sense what they are to achieve. It is mostly of the
long range. They do not tell what is to be done but show the overall direction of the course of
action.
b) Tactical planning: - It refers to the process of developing action plans through which strategies
are executed. They are to convert the strategic plans into action plans. It tries to develop the
plans which are not broad as strategic planning. Example:
Developing annual budget for each department, division and project, choosing specific measures
of implementing strategic plans.
Deciding on the courses of actions for improving current operations.
C) Operational planning
It is most specific and detailed action plan.
It is made at the operating level and concerned with the day to day, week to week execution of
the organizational activities.
They tell exactly and specifically what should be done in the short range. They are action plans.
Chapter_3
Managerial Decision-Making
Meaning:
Decision-making is a rational choice or selection of one alternative from among a set of
alternatives; i.e. it is the act of choosing one alternative from among a set of alternatives.
Decision-making is the management function that consists of choosing one course of action
from all the available alternatives.
Decision-making is part of every aspect of the manager’s duties, which include planning,
organizing, staffing, leading and controlling, i.e. decision-making is universal. In all
managerial functions decision-making is involved. All managerial functions have to be
decided. For example, managers can formulate planning objectives only after making
decisions about the organization’s basic mission. Even though in all managerial functions
decision-making is involved, the critical decision-making is during planning because
planning identifies the objectives of the organization; i.e. decision must be made to identify
the objectives/missions of an organization. In the planning process, managers decide such
matters as what goals or opportunities their organization will pursue, what resources will be
used, who will perform each required task etc. The entire planning process involves
managers in a continual series of decision-making situations.
A non-crisis problem is an issue that requires resolutions but does not simultaneously have
the importance and immediacy characteristics of a crisis. Many of the decisions that
managers make center on non-crisis problems. Example of such problems is a factory that
needs to be brought into conformity with new state antipollution standards during the next
three years and an employee who frequently is late for work.
An opportunity problem is a situation that offers strong potential for significant
organizational gain if appropriate actions are taken. Opportunities typically involve new
ideas and novel directions that could be used, rather than difficulties that must be resolved.
Non-innovative managers tend to focus on problems rather than opportunities.
Confusions are common in problem definition because the events or issues that attract the
manager’s attention may be symptoms of another more fundamental and pervasive difficulty
than the problem itself. That is, there may exist confusion on the identification of a problem and
its symptoms. The accurate definition of a problem affects all the steps that follow. Managers
once they have identified problems, they have to try to diagnose the cause of the problem.
Causes unlike symptoms are seldom apparent.
This step has three general stages: scanning, categorization, and diagnosis.
Scanning stage: involves monitoring the work situation for changing circumstances that may
signal the emergence of a problem. At this point the manager may be only vaguely aware that
an environmental change could lead to a problem or that an existing situation constitutes a
problem.
Categorization stage: entails attempting to understand and verify signs that there is some type
of discrepancy between the current state and the desired state. At this point the manager
attempts to categorize the situation as a problem and a no problem, even though it may be
difficult to specify the exact nature of the problem, if one exists.
Diagnosis stage: involves gathering additional information and specifying both the nature
and the causes of the problem. Without appropriate diagnosis, it is difficult to experience
success in the rest of the decision-making process. At the diagnosis stage, the problem should
be stated in terms of the discrepancy between current conditions and what is desired; the
cause of the discrepancy should be specified.
Developing Alternatives
Before a decision is made feasible alternatives should be developed. This is a search process in
which relevant internal and external environment of the organization are investigated to provide
information that can be developed into possible alternatives. At this point it is necessary to list as
many possible alternatives solutions to the problem as you can. No major decision should be
made until several alternative solutions have been developed. Decision-making at this stage
requires finding creative and imaginative alternatives using full mental faculty. The manager
needs help in this situation through brainstorming or Delphi technique.
Evaluating Alternatives
Once managers have developed a set of alternatives, they must evaluate them to see how
effective each would be. Each alternative must be judged in light of the goals and resources of
the organization and how well the alternative will help solve the problem. In addition, each
alternative must be judged in terms of its consequences for the organization. Will any problems
arise when a particular course of action is followed? Such factors as worker’s willingness…
Choosing an Alternative
Based on the evaluation made managers select the best alternative; In trying to select an
alternative or combination of alternatives, managers find a solution that appears to offer the
fewest serious disadvantages and the most advantages. The purpose of selecting an alternative is
to solve the problem so as to achieve a predetermined objective. Managers should take care not
to solve one problem and create another with their choice.
A decision is not an end by itself but only a means to an end. This means the factors that lead to
implementation and follow –up should follow solution selection.
Implementing and Monitoring the Chosen Solution
For the entire decision-making process to be successful, considerable thought must be given to
implementing and monitoring the chosen solution. It is possible to make a "good' decision in
terms of the first five steps and still have the process fail because of difficulties at this final step.
Implementing the Solution: A decision that is not implemented is little more than an abstraction.
In other words, any decision must be effectively implemented to achieve the objectives for which
it was made. Implementing a decision involves more than giving orders. Resources must be
acquired and allocated. Decisions are not ends by themselves they are means to an end; so proper
implementation is necessary to achieve that end.
Monitoring the solution: Monitoring is necessary to ensure that things are progressing as planned
and that the problem that triggered the decision process has been resolved. Effective
management involves periodic measurements of results. Actual results are compared with
planned results (the objective); if deviations exist, changes must be made. Here again we see the
importance of measurable objectives. If such objectives do not exist, then there is no way to
judge performance. If actual results do not much planned results, then the changes must be made
in the solution chosen, in its implementation, or in the original objective if it deemed
unattainable. The various actions taken to implement a decision must be monitored. The more
important the problem, the greater the effort that needs to be expended on appropriate follow up
mechanisms. Are things working according to plan? What is happening in the internal and
external environments as a result of the decision? Are subordinates performing according to
expectations? ……. must be closely monitored.
Decision-Making Conditions
When managers make decisions, the amount of information available to them or the degree of
knowledge they have about the likelihood of the occurrence of each alternative vary from
managers to managers or/and from situation to situation. To put it in other way, decisions are
made under three basic conditions. These are condition of certainty, condition of risk, and
condition of uncertainty.
Decision-making under Certainty: When managers know with certainty what their
alternatives are and what conditions are associated with each alternative, a state of certainty
exists. Decisions under certainty are those in which the external conditions are identified and
very predictable; i.e. we are reasonably sure what will happen when we make a decision. The
information is available and is considered to be reliable, and we know the cause and effect
relationships. In decision-making under certainty there is a little ambiguity and relatively low
chance of making poor/bad decisions. Decision-making under certainty seldom occurs,
however, because external conditions seldom are perfectly predictable and because it is
impossible to try to account for all possible influences on any given outcome it is very rare.
Types of Decisions
Decisions can be classified in to: programmed and non-programmed.
Programmed Decisions Programmed decisions are those made in routine, repetitive, well-
structured situations through the use of predetermined decision rules. The decision rules may
be based on habit, computational techniques, or established policies and procedures. Such
rules usually stem from prior experience or technical knowledge about what works in the
particular type of situation. Most of the decisions made by first line managers and many of
those made by middle managers are the programmed type, but very few of the decisions
made by top-level managers are the programmed type. Managers can usually handle
programmed decisions through rules, procedures, and policies. E.g. Establishing a re-order
point, Decide if students meet graduation requirements, Determination of employee pay rates
In reality most decisions fall between the two; i.e. a continuum of decision situations exists
ranging from those that are highly structured to those that are unstructured. Situations between
the two extremes are partially structured. As the name suggests, in a partially structured
situation, only a part is well structured. Typically, although the manager has a great deal of data
available, the final choice is not obvious. Many intangibles are involved in the final choice.
Therefore, the manager must base the ultimate decision on the data and supplementary factors,
using judgment and experience.
E.g. A hospital wishing to improve patient care may adjust its patient-staff ratio (programmable
situation), reorganize its staff (a non programmable situation).
Sometimes a manager’s decision is not exactly “poor”, but it still doesn’t produce optimal
results. Less than optimal decisions can have three causes:
Bounded rationality imposes limits on a decision, such as that it should be economical or
logistically practical. This limit serves as a screening device, eliminating some of the
alternatives. The manager must choose from the options that have filtered through the
restrictions. The overall optimal decision may no longer be a valid option when using this
method. The decision maker simply selects the best alternative, given various specifications
that must be met.
Sub optimization is a manager’s tendency to operate solely in the interests of his/her
department rather than in the interests of the company as a whole. In making a decision, the
department manager cannot be so self-centered as to ignore the effects of the action on other
areas. The key is to improve the company’s performance, not just the performance of one
department.
Unforeseen changes in the business environment also cause less than optimal decisions.
CHAPTER 4
ORGANIZING
INTRODUCTION
Organization is used in two different senses, in the first sense; it is used to denote the process of
organization. In the second sense, it is used to denote the result of that process, namely the
organization structure.
Using it in the first sense, organization is the process of defining and grouping the activities of
the enterprise and establishing the authority relationship among them. In performing organizing
function, the manager differentiates and integrates the activities of his/ her organization. By
differentiation is meant the process of departmentalization or segmentation of activities on the
basis of some homogeneity. Integration is the process of achieving unity of effort among the
various departments.
4.1 Definitions of Organizing
What to do and how to do have already been determines in the planning process. The result of a
good planning process is a detailed program of what actions are to be taken to accomplish
predetermines objectives, how long it will take, and where it will take place.
The next task becomes that of organizing. Organizing is the process of identifying and grouping
tasks to be performed, assigning responsibility and delegating authority and establishing
relationships for the purpose of enabling to work most effectively together in the
accomplishment of objectives.
The organizing Function has the following four distinct Activities:
I. It determines what work activities have to be done to accomplish organizational objectives.
II. It classifies the type of work needed and groups the work in to manageable units.
III. It assigns the work to individuals and delegates the appropriate authority.
IV. It designs a hierarchy of decision-Making Relationships.
Organizing results in an organization structure that can be thought of as a framework that holds
the various functions together according to the pattern determined by management. An
organization structure is a tool of management to achieve plans.
The groups can consist of all the members in the same work areas or membership developed
across departmental lines.
Members may be all management or non-management personnel.
Horizontal groups are the common kind of informal groups by virtue of the ease of
accessibility.
Membership in a horizontal group is usually mutually beneficial to individuals - “You help
me and I will help you”. People in the same or related work areas often share the same
problems, interests, and concerns.
Vertical Groups
Include people on different levels of the formal organization’s hierarchy. These people
always come together within the same department (work areas).
A vertical group can consist of a supervisor and one or more of his/her employees. It may
also be formed through skip - level relationships - a top-level manager may associate with a
first level manager.
Their relationships can be the result of outside interests or various employment relationships.
Mixed Group
It is a combination of two or more persons whose positions are on different levels of the
formal organization and in different work areas. E.g. a Vice-President may develop a close
relationship with the director of computer services in order to get preferential treatment.
A production manager may cultivate an informal, social relationship with the director of
maintenance for the same reason.
Mixed groups often form because of common bonds outside work.
Similarity: People may join informal groups because they are attracted to other people who
are similar to themselves. Several persons with the same attitudes or beliefs may join one
group. Other factors or similarity can be personality, race, sex, economic position, age,
educational background etc.
In informal group/organization one is not limited to one informal organization because there
may exist still unsatisfied needs by involving in one/two informal organization.
Resistance to change: The informal organization can resist change. In an effort to protect its
values and beliefs, the informal group can place roadblocks in the path to any modifications
in the work environment. The informal group shows its resistance through hampering its
implementation.
Conflict: The informal group can create two “masters” for an employee. In an attempt to
satisfy the informal group, the employee may come in conflict with the formal organization.
E.g. The Company may allow 10 minutes for coffee break; however, the informal group may
extend it to 30 minutes for the employee’s social satisfaction. Therefore, the employee’s social
satisfaction is in conflict with the employer’s need for productivity.
Rumor: The informal communication system - the grapevine - can create and process false
information or rumors. The creation of rumors can upset the balance of the work
environment.
Pressure to conform: The norms that the informal groups develop act as a strong inducement
toward conformity. The more cohesive the group, the more accepted are the behavioral
standards. Non-conforming in the person’s reference group can result in gentle verbal
reminders from the group but can escheat to harassment – ostracism (exclusion).
Encourages better management: Managers should be aware of the power of the informal
organization in what is actually a check and balance system. Planned changes should be
made with an awareness of the ability of the informal group to make the plan successful or
unsuccessful.
Provides stability in the work environment: The informal organization can provide
acceptance and belonging. This feeling of being wanted by the group can encourage
employees to remain into environment, thus reducing turnover. Additionally, the informal
organization provides a place for a person to vent frustrations. Being able to discuss them in
a supportive environment may receive emotional pressures.
responsibility limits, so that the subordinate knows well in advance as to what type of work is
expected of him by the superior.
Providing for coordination and control: The interrelationships between various positions
must be specified clearly. The activities and efforts of various individuals must be
coordinated. The performance must be measured, evaluated and controlled at frequent
intervals. If deviations occur, they must be spotted early and appropriate remedial steps taken
immediately.
The process of combining jobs into groups is termed departmentation. A manager must have a
basis, or rationale, for combining jobs. Numerous bases for departmentation exits; The more
important ones are explained below.
a. Functional Departmentation: Jobs can be grouped to the functions of the organization. A
business firm includes such functions as production marketing, finance, accounting, and
personnel. A major disadvantage of the functional arrangement, however, appears when
specialists, working with and encouraging one another in their respected areas of expertise
and interest, let the organizational objectives take a back seat to departmental objectives.
b. Territorial (Geographic) Departmentation: Another commonly used departmental basis is
built around geography. All activities in a geographic area are assigned to a particular
manager. This individual is in charge of all operations in that geographic area. A business
firm that is dispersed graphically often will use territory as s departmentation basis. The
territorial basis frequently is used by firms whose operations are similar from region to
region.
their progress. The territorial basis also enables the firm to develop local marketer areas and
adjust more quickly to local customers’ needs.
The disadvantages of territorial departmentation include: difficulties in maintaining consistent
adherence to company policy and practices, duplication of effort, and the necessity of having a
relatively large number of managers.
c. Product Departmentation: In many large, diversified companies, activities and personnel are
grouped on the basis of product. As a firm grows, coordinating its various functional
departments become more difficult, and product departmentation can ease coordination
problems. This form of organization allows personnel to develop total expertise in
researching, manufacturing, and distributing one product lines. Concentrating authority,
responsibility, and accountability in a specific product department allows top management to
better coordinate its activities. The need for coordinating production, engineering, sales, and
service cannot be overestimated. With in each of these product groups, you find production
and marketing personnel. Since group executives coordinate the sales, manufacture, and
distribution of a product, they become overseers of a profit center; this is the manner in
which profit responsibility is exacted from product organizational arrangements.
The disadvantages of product–based organizations stem from the need to create relatively
independent divisions. Each division must have all the resources and types of jobs necessary to
be in business, Each division also must have accountants, lawyers, engineers, market researchers,
and scientists assigned to it , Therefore, the product based organization runs the danger of
duplication of effort among its divisions.
d. Customer Departmentation: Grouping activities so that reflect a primary interest in customers
is common in a variety of enterprises. Customers are the key to the way activities are
grouped when each of the different things an enterprise does for them is managed by one
department head. The industrial sales department of a wholesaler that also sells to retailers is
a case in point. Business owners and managers frequently arrange activities on this basis to
cater to the requirements of clearly defined customer groups, and educational institutions
offer regular and extension courses to serve different groups of students.
Advantages: Customer Departmentation can address the special and widely varied needs of
customers for clearly defined services .The manufacturer that sells to both wholesalers and
industrial buyers frequently can meet their special needs by setting up separate departments.
Non-business groups follow similar practices. The extension services of universities, such as
night-school divisions, are arranged, with respect to time, subject matter, and sometimes
instructors, to appeal to an entirely different group of students than those who attend the
university on a full – time day basis.
e. Multiple
The methods cited above for dividing work are not exhaustive; there are many other ways to
combine jobs into departments. Furthermore, most large organizations are composed of
department using different bases. They combine their activities by combining different bases.
For example, at the upper levels of management, the vice presidents reporting to the president
may represent different product groups. At the level directly below the vice presidents, the
managers may be part of a particular function. At the next level in the organization, there may
be a number of different technical classifications.
Line authority defines the relationship between superior and subordinate. It is a direct
supervisory relationship. Managers who supervise operating employees or other managers
have line authority. Line authority flows downward in an organization directly form superior
to subordinate.
Staff authority is advisory in mature. Managers whose role is to provide advice or technical
assistance are grated advisory authority. Advisory authority does not provide any basis for
direct control over the subordinates or activates of other departments with whom they
consult. (Within the staff manager’s own department, he or she exercises line authority over
the department’s subordinates.)
Functional authority is authority delegated to an individual or department are specific
activities undertaken by personnel in other departments. Staff departments may be given
functional authority to control their systems’ procedures in other departments. A common
specific example occurs in the personnel department, which must monitor and receive
compliance in oeratind departments for recruitment, selection, and performance appraisal
systems. See figure 5.1
General Manager
Legal
Research
and dev’t
Manufacturing
Production
#Staff
departments
Fig 5.1
Line and staff Departments
Line departments, headed by a ‘line manager,’ are the departments established to meet the
major objectives of the organization. Departments normally designated as line departments
include production, marketing, and finance. In functioning with the employees and
departments under their control line managers exercise line authority.
Staff departments provide assistance to the line departments and to each other. They can be
viewed as making money indirectl7y for the company-through advice, service, and
assistance. The traditional staff departments include legal, personnel, computer services, and
public relations.
2. Delegation of Authority
Managers should decide how much authority should be delegated to each job and each job
holder. Authority refers to the right of individuals to make decisions without approval by higher
management and to exact obedience from others. Delegation is a concept describing the passing
of formal authority to another person. Superiors delegate, or pass authority down, to subordinates
in order to facilitate work being accomplished. Delegation may become necessary when
managers are absent from their jobs or just may be the philosophy of the manager in order to
develop subordinates. Whatever the reason for delegation, its application creates a sequence
of events:
Assignment of tasks: Specific tasks or duties that are to be undertaken are identified by the
manager for assignment to the subordinate. The subordinate is then approached with the
assignment (tasks).
Delegation of authority: In order for the subordinate to complete the duties or tasks, the
authority necessary to do them should be delegated by the manager to the subordinate. A
guideline for authority is that it should be adequate to complete the task- no more and no less.
Acceptance of Responsibility: Responsibility to carry out one’s assigned duties to the best of
one’s ability. The employee is the receiver of the assigned duties and the delegated authority;
these confer responsibility as well.
Creation of accountability: Accountability is having to answer to someone for your actions. It
means taking the consequences- either credit or blame .When the subordinate accepts the
assignment and the authority, he or she will be held accountable or answerable for actions
taken. A manager is accountable for the use of her or his authority and performance. The
manager is also accountable for the use of her authority and performance. The manager is
also accountable for performance and actions of subordinates.
This four-step process should ensure that the process of delegation produces clear understanding
on the part of the manager and of the subordinate. The manager should take the time to think
through what is being assigned and to confer the authority necessary to achieve results. The
subordinate, in accepting the assignment, becomes obligated (responsible) to perform, knowing
that he or she is accountable (answerable) for the results.
3. Centralization vs. Decentralization
The more flexible the interpretation of company policy at the lower levels, the greater the
degree of decentralization.
The more widely dispersed the operations of the company geographically, the greater the
degree of decentralization. The less a subordinate has to refer to his or her manager prior to a
decision, the greater the decentralization.
4. Span of Control (Span of Management)
The span of control or span of management is concerned with the number of subordinates
each manager should have to direct. There is no correct number for the span of control. It is
determined for each manager based on the interplay of the complexity and variety of the
subordinates’ work, ability and training of the subordinates, the ability of the manager, and
the company philosophy for centralization or decentralization of decision-making.
As a general rule, the more complex a subordinate’s job, the fewer should be that manager’s
number of subordinates, the greater the number of subordinates that can be effectively
directed and controlled. Because of these general rules, organizations always seem to have
narrow spans at their tops and wider spans at lower levels. The higher one goes in the
organization’s hierarchy, the fewer will be his or her subordinate i.e., the higher you go in an
organization’s hierarchy, the more subordinates a manager will have.
Just how many subordinates should any one manager have? The answer to this question
depends on many factors and must be determined with a specific manager or job in mind.
How much is the organization asking this manager to control? How are the tasks to be
divided? What are the resources –people, money, and time-available? If a manager has too
few people to supervise, her or his subordinates might be either overworked or become
frustrated and dissatisfied.
The qualifications of the managers and their subordinates must be considered when creating
spans of control. The more capable and experienced the subordinates, the more that can be
widened with the growth in experience and competence of personnel – thus the continuing
need for training and development. Another factor that can influence the span of control of a
manager is the company’s philosophy toward centralization or decentralization in decision-
making.
Developing action plans: Once the supply and demand of human resource are estimated
adjustments may be needed.
Recruitment
It is a process of searching for prospective employees and stimulating them to apply for jobs in
the organization. Or seeking and attracting a supply of people from which qualified candidates
for ho vacancies can be selected.
Internal source: Through transfer, promotion, and recall from lay-offs
a. Transfer
Same occupational level
Same level of wage/salary and other benefits
b. Promotion
Advancements to better job-greater responsibilities
More prestige or status
Greater skills, increased rate of pay, merit and seniority are important factors in
promotion
Selection: It is choosing from those available the individuals who are most likely to succeed on
the job.
The selection process may include
Preliminary interview
Filling Application form by which factual information is obtaining with carefully designed
questions including identification information, personal information, physical characteristics,
education, and experience.
Reference letters which can be written in a to whom it may concern form
Employment interview: which is used to a single screening mechanism provides an
opportunity to have face to face contacts, serves to verify information acquired through other
methods, and enables the employer to investigate the candidate ability in work related areas.
Employment test: are practical examination of the candidate’s abilities and knowledge in the
areas of future job assignment. It includes:
Aptitude Test-Measures a person’s capacity for potential ability to learn
Psychomotor test: measure a person’s strength, dexterity and coordination
Job knowledge test: measure the job related knowledge possessed by a job applicant.
Physical Examination
Placement and Induction/orientation: Selected individuals should be given placement letters
that state their employment and specific positions. Induction or orientation has to do with
familiarizing the new employees with the organization.
Training can be conducted either on-the-job, that is within the actual work environment, off-the-
job, that is outside the actual work.
Among the training methods are:
Job/Position rotation: Rotating key personnel in different positions/department
Coaching: the trainee is placed under a close guidance and supervision of the trainer
/immediate supervisor/and he/she given an opportunity to perform an increasing range of
management tasks, and share the cache’s experience.
Internship: a joint program of training where school and business corporate in order to
train students by assigning them to job.
Role playing: it forces trainees to assume different identities. Example; a male worker
may assume the role of a female supervisor, and vice versa.
Case study: it utilizes simulated or actual business problems experienced before for
trainees to solve where the trainee will be expected to study the information given and to
make decisions.
Lectures, conferences, seminars and work shop
Lectures: is semi-formal discourse in which the instructor presents a series of events, concepts,
principles, and theories and express problems or explains relationships.
Conference: bring together individuals with common interests to discuss and attempt to solve a
problem.
Workshop: a group of persons with common interest or problem after performing professional
and vocational work met for an extended period of time to improve their individual proficiency,
ability or understanding.
Apprenticeship: involves learning from more experienced employees. It is common in
technical fields in which proficiency is acquired in direct association with work and
direct supervision
Conducting Training
Training can be delivered either by people from the organization itself or by those outside the
organization. It should be based on appropriate content trainers and trainees, training methods,
facilities and places and appropriate time schedule.
5.4 Maintenance and Utilization
Procured and trained/developed employees should be maintained and utilized utmost. This
requires adequate remuneration of personnel, the creation of opportunities for progress and a
mechanism of evaluating their contribution. Compensation and performance appraisal are at the
heart of the maintenance and utilization function of human resources management.
5.4.1 Compensation
It is adequate and equitable remuneration of personnel for their contribution to the achievement
of organizational objectives. From an employee’s point of view, pay is necessity in life, it is the
means by which employees provide for their own their families needs, it is a contributing factor
to their efforts as what they are paid indicates their worth, etc.
For the employer, compensation constitutes the lion’s share of costs/about 50%/, is the major
means of attracting and retaining employees, it can provide an image to the organization, etc.
Pay can be determined relatively or absolutely. Pay for a particular position is set relative to
three groups:
Employees working on similar jobs in other enterprise/External equity/
Employees working on different jobs within the same enterprise/Internal equity/
Employees working on the same job within the same enterprise/Employees equity/
Internal Factors
The size and age of the organization: it is argued that large and new organization tends to
pay higher wages compared to small and old ones.
The labour budget/resource allocation strategy/
Managerial philosophy and strategy. As top level management has the final say on pay
level decisions, their views and strategies affect payment decisions.
Methods of Payment
Employees’ salaries can be computed based on
The time they worked, e.g. salaries,
The output they produce/piece rate system/ or,
A combination of both
Appraisal Methods
There are different methods of carrying out performance appraisal which include;
Forced distribution method
---- appraisal
Self appraisal
The three principal actors in employee relations are employees, employers, and the government.
Generally, all these parties are represented by other bodies such as the labour union,
manager/employer association, and specialized government unit.
The three basic elements of the subject of employee relations are;
Collective Bargaining: this is a two way negotiation process between employees and
employers to reach at an agreement on matters of employment. The end result of a successful
collective bargaining process is collective agreement that is a binding document governing
employee relations during a specified period of time.
Grievance/Complaint/ handling: employees should have established and known methods of
processing grievance – grievance procedure. The grievance procedure consists of an orderly
series of steps followed to resolve disputes. Employment should know where they stand in
matters pertaining to the justice or injustice of their treatment.
Disciplinary Action: it refers to the application of penalties that lead to an inhibition of
undesired behavior. Among the penalties available are oral reprimand, written reprimand,
and loss of privileges, fines, layoffs, demotion, suspension and dismissal
Separation
The final human resource management function is separation. Like other functions this requires
separation and planning. Separation can be initiated by employers like mandatory retirement,
dismissal, layoff; by the employee like resignation, voluntary retirement, quits; by agreement say
when contract ends, or they can also be caused by things outside the will of both the employer
and the employee (accidents, death), retirement, layoff, dismissal, resignation, quit,
outplacement, permanent disability, are among the cause for the separation of employee from the
organization.
Leadership is the art of influencing people so that they will strive willingly and
enthusiastically toward the achievement of organizational or group goals.
Leadership is the ability to secure desirable actions from a group of followers voluntarily
without the use of coercion or force.
As we can see from the above definitions, leadership has three ingredients: leader, led (follower)
and goal (situation) – organizational Environment.
Leader: - the one with the ability to understand others’ motivation and to inspire them with
the ability to create a climate for motivation.
Follower (led) - the individuals being led or influenced
Environment- the working environment in which the leader interacts with the followers.
Leading is the management function aimed at setting the members of an organization move in
the direction that will achieve its objectives. Directing builds a climate, provides leadership and
arranges the opportunity for motivation. Leading is not deriving or pushing from behind; it is
placing oneself before the group and facilitating progress and inspires followers to accomplish
organizational (group) objectives.
Leadership versus Management
Management is a broad subject that encompasses activities such as planning, organizing,
staffing, directing, and controlling. Leadership, on the other hand, focuses almost exclusively on
the ‘people’ aspects of getting a job done-inspiring, motivating, directing, and gaining
commitment to organizational activities and goals. Leadership accompanies and complements
the management functions. In short, management influences brain, while leadership encourages
the heart and the spirit.
The Need for Leadership
The need for leadership can be explained by the fact that organizations will never be successful
unless they have effective and efficient leaders. The effectiveness and efficiency of leaders is
nothing but to create conducive environment in the organization. Whatever amount of capital
invested and technology an organization has, without effective leadership the organization will
not be successful.
The importance of the directing function in the organization can be presented as follows:
Directing initiates actions by giving directives and guidance to employees.
under the control of individual manager include salary increases /pay raises, bonus,
interesting projects, promotion recommendations, a better office, support for training
programs, assignments with high responsibility in the organization, recognition, positive
feedback etc. Purchasing agents, with little position power; might be able to exercise
considerable influence by their ability to expedite or delay a much-needed spare part. Or
University professors have considerable reward power; they can grant or withhold high
grades.
Coercive Power is a power based on fear. It is the negative side of reward power. Coercive
power is the ability to coerce or punish the influences/followers when they do not engage in
desired behaviors. Forms of coercion or punishment include criticisms, terminations,
reprimands, suspensions, warning letters that go into an individual’s personnel file, negative
performance appraisals, demotions and withheld pay raises; (punishment may range from
loss of a minor privilege to loss of one's job). Coercive power is usually used to maintain a
minimum standard performance or conformity among subordinates. The greater the freedom
to punish others, the greater a manager’s coercive power. And the more coercive power a
manager uses, the more resentment and opposition s/he faces from subordinates.
Expert Power: - refers to power that a leader possesses as a result of his or her knowledge
and expertise regarding the tasks to be performed by subordinates. It is power based on the
possession of expertise, knowledge, skill or information. To the extent that a leader possesses
expertise and information that is needed or desired by others, the leader has expert power.
Physicians, lawyers, and university professors may have considerable influence on others
because they are respected for their special knowledge. A manger who is capable of
achieving an important methodological break through that no other companies dreamed of
and a secretary who knows how to reveal bureaucratic red tape all have expert power over
anyone who needs that information.
Referent Power / Charismatic Power is power that results from being admired, personally
identified with or liked by others. When we admire people, want to be like them, or feel
friendship toward them, we more willingly follow their directions and exhibit loyalty toward
them. For example, a Movie Star, a Great Athlete, a Great Football Player, a Musician or a
Military Hero might possess considerable referent power.
The strength of referent power is directly related to such factors as the amount of prestige and
admiration the influence confers up on the influencer.
The more that a leader is able to cultivate the liking, identification, and admiration of others, the
greater the referent power.
The more power a leader has at his/her disposal, the more likely that s/he will be successful in
influencing followers to do the work assigned to them except coercive power.
Although all five types of power are potential means of influencing others, in actual usage they
may engender somewhat different levels of subordinate motivation. Subordinates can react to a
leader’s direction with commitment, compliance, or resistance. With commitment, employees
respond enthusiastically and exert a high level of effort toward organizational goals. With
compliance, employees exert at least minimal efforts to complete directives but are likely to
deliver average, rather than stellar, performance. With resistance, employees may appear to
comply but actually do the absolute minimum, possibly even attempting to sabotage the
attainment of organizational goals.
Types of outcome
Source of Leader Basis for power Commitment Compliance Resistance
influences
Referent power Admiration and Likely* Possible Possible
liking by others. If request is believed If request is perceived If request is something
to be important to to be unimportant to that will harm leader
leader leader
Expert power Possession of Likely* Possible Possible
valued expertise If request is If request is If leader is arrogant
persuasive and persuasive but and insulting or
subordinates share subordinates are subordinates oppose
leader’s task goals apathetic about task task goals
goal
Legitimate Hierarchical Possible Likely* Possible
Authority Power
It is positional: it will be there when the It is personal-it exists because of the person.
incumbent leaves. Broader
Some types of power do not change (Expert, referent)
Narrower – it is one
Leadership Theoriestype of power but some change legitimate, reward, coercive.
It changes withtheory:
changes in position. Not all power types can be delegated (Expert and
a. Trait referent).
Authority is delegated to an individual
Traits are distinctive internal or personal qualities or characteristics of an individual, it
can be
Physical: like height, weight, appearance, health, etc
Personal: like self-confidence, dominance, adaptable, extroversion/sociability, originality
etc
Mental: like intelligence, creativity, knowledge, technical competence etc.
A leader trait is a physical or personality characteristic that can be used to differentiate leaders
from followers.
Trait theory attempts to find traits that make a leader. That is, it is a theory, the old approach,
which focused on identifying the personal traits that differentiated leaders from followers. Trait
theory originated from an ancient theory called “Great Man” theory that assumes that “leaders
are born not made”-a belief dating back to the ancient Greeks and Romans.
The idea in trait theory was to see whether certain traits would predict the individuals who would
emerge (be identified by members of the group) as leaders.
In searching for measurable leadership traits, researchers took two approaches:
They attempted to compare the traits of those who emerged as leaders with the traits of those
who did not. They attempted to compare the traits of effective leaders with those of ineffective
leaders. Studies that were conducted on the first category have failed to distinguish/uncover any
traits that clearly and consistently distinguish leaders from followers. Leaders as a group have
been found to be somewhat taller, brighter, more extroverted, persistent and more self-confident
than non-leaders. However, millions of people have these traits, but most of them obviously will
never attain a leadership position. In addition, many established leaders did not and do not have
these traits. (Napoleon, for example, was quite short, and Lincoln was moody and introverted.)
Interestingly enough, studies have also found that people who are too intelligent compared with
other group members do not emerge as leaders-perhaps because they are too different or too far
removed from the group.
Studies that were conducted on the second category have generally failed to isolate traits that are
strongly associated with successful leadership. Generally, the efforts to identify universal
leadership traits ran into difficulties for the following reasons:
Not all leaders possess all the traits and many non-leaders may possess most of the traits.
It gives no guidance as to the magnitude of each trait for a person to be a leader.
No agreement has been reached as to what their relationships are to the actual instances of
leadership.
Traits tend to be a chicken-and-egg proposition i.e. Successful leaders may display traits such as
good vocabulary, education and self-confidence after they have assumed leadership positions.
When it became evident that effective leaders did not seem to have any distinguishing traits or
characteristics, researchers tried to isolate the behaviors that made leaders effective, in other
words, rather than try to figure out what effective leaders were, researchers tried to determine
what effective leaders did, how they delegated tasks, how they communicated with and tried to
motivate their subordinates, how they carried out their tasks, and so no. This tries to answer the
questions “What do effective leaders do? What ineffective leaders don't do? How do subordinate
react emotionally and behaviorally (performance) to what the leader does? Two major
dimensions of leader behavior emerged from this body of research; one deals with how leaders
get the job done and the other deals with how leaders treat and interact with their subordinates.
University of Michigan study University of Michigan Studies
Through interviewing leaders and followers, researchers at the University of Michigan
identified two distinct styles of leadership, referred to as .job-centered and employee -
centered.
The job-centered leader practices close supervision on the subordinates’ performance. This
leader relies on coercion, reward, and legitimate power to influence the behavior and
performance of followers.
The employee-centered leader believes in delegating authority and supporting followers in
satisfying their needs by creating a supportive work environment. The employee centered
leader is concerned with followers', their personal advancement, growth and achievement.
The university of OHIO study: These studies isolated two leadership factors, referred to as
initiating structure and consideration.
Initiating structure involves behavior in which the leader organizes and defines the
relationship in the group, tends to establish well-defined patterns and channels of
communication, and spells out ways of getting the job done.
Consideration involves behavior indicating sensitiveness to subordinates, respect their ideas
and feelings, and establishes mutual trust and friendship between the leader and the
followers. In short, the behavioral theory attempted to identify effective leader behaviors that
would work in every situation. But researchers found that leader behaviors that worked best
in one situation were not often as effective in other situations.
c. The Contingency /Situational Leadership Theory
Situational leadership theory grows out of an attempt to explain the inconsistent findings about
traits and styles /behaviors. Situational theory proposes that the effectiveness of a particular style
of leader behavior depends on the situation. As situations change, different styles become
appropriate. This directly changes the idea of one best style of leadership. In other words, the
contingency/situational theory holds that appropriate leader traits or behaviors are contingent or
dependent on relevant situational characteristics. More specifically, the contingency leadership
theory states that, leadership is the result of the interaction of:
Leaders: behavior and competence
Followers: behavior and competence
Situations: situational variables such as job characteristics, organizational policies,
leaders member relations (the extent to which a leader has the support of group
members), position power (the amount of power that the organization gives the leader to
accomplish necessary tasks).
d. Theory X and Theory Y Assumptions about People
A manager’s philosophy about work and the people who perform the work will influence his/her
approach to leadership. Douglas McGregor has hypothesized two sets of assumptions about
people that serve as a philosophical base for leadership action. These are Theory X and Theory Y
Assumptions.
Theory X – pessimistic and negative: A manager basing an operating philosophy on Theory X
would impose a directive leadership style on the individual or work group s/he is supervising.
Coercion, negative motivation, and refusal to allow employee participate in decision-
making would probably be the actions of the manager.
McGregor’s Theory X view of human nature holds that the dislike of work is so great that even
the promise of rewards will not overcome it. “People will accept the rewards and demand
continually higher ones, but these alone will not produce the necessary effort. Only the threat of
punishment will do the trick.
Theory Y- adopts a developmental approach/ modern + positive set of assumptions
A manager with Theory Y assumption will prepare him/herself to work with people as
individuals, to involve people in the process of decision-making, to openly encourage people to
seek responsibility and to work with people achieve their goals.
Why? Because the manager assumes:
The average human being does not inherently dislike work; the physical and mental effort
involved is as natural as play or rest.
External control and threat of punishment are not the only means for bringing about effort
toward organizational objectives. A person will exercise self-direction and self control in the
service of objectives to which s/he is committed.
People generally become committed to organizational objectives if they are rewarded for
doing so.
The average human being learns, under proper conditions, not only to accept, but also they
seek responsibility.
Many people have a relatively high degree of imagination, ingenuity, and creativity in the
solution of organizational problems.
The average person’s intellectual potential is only partially utilized under the conditions of
modern industrial life.
The assumptions in Theory Y have remarkably different implications for managers than do those
of Theory X. Instead of blaming poor performance on basic human nature, Theory Y places
squarely on management the responsibility for tapping the reservoir of creativity, hard work, and
imagination. The worker’s performance is limited only by management’s ability to use human
resources effectively. Theory Y also has implications for decision-making. Because it recognizes
worker’s intellectual potential, this philosophy suggests that organizational goals are best
achieved if workers have voice in decisions. Participatory decisions making is especially
important as it relates to a person’s job. In addition, Theory Y vie of human nature implies that a
manager’s role is not to manipulate workers; rather, it is to create an atmosphere in which
workers can use their commitment and involvement to satisfy their personal needs as well as
those of the organization.
LEADERSHIP STYLES
The focus on finding leadership style (behavior patterns of leaders) is on the relationship
between leaders’ action and the reaction of subordinates emotionally and behaviorally. A
manager’s leadership style is composed of three parts:
How the manager chooses to motivate subordinates: Motivation approach can be positive
(like Responsibility, Recognition, Praise, Security, Monetary Rewards) or negative (like
Threats, Coercion, Fines, Suspensions, Termination)
His/her decision-making style: the degree of decision-making authority the manager grants to
subordinates.
His/her areas of emphasis (orientation) in the work environment: Task orientation, employee
orientation
Based on the above points there are three types of leadership styles: Autocratic, Democratic, and
Laissez-faire.
Authoritarian (Autocratic) Leadership Style: It is closely associated with the classical
approach to management. The manager who follows this style is dogmatic and leads by the
ability to withhold or give rewards and punishment, i.e. motivation is through incentives and
fear. In this style, decision-making is solely by the manager, in other words, the leader retains
all authority and responsibility. In the extreme case, the manager makes the decision and
announces it to the work group. There is no opportunity for input into the decision-making
process by the subordinates and communication is primarily downward. Variations of this
approach find the manager making the decision and then “Selling” it to employees or making
the decision and allowing the group the opportunity to ask questions. The autocratic leader is
task-oriented and places little value on showing consideration to subordinations as a
leadership technique. The Autocratic manager uses Theory X assumption as his philosophical
base for leadership. There are situations where managers are compelled/ forced to use this
leadership style. Some are:
When there is a need to influence subordinates in favor of organizational objectives which has an
effect on individuals.
When subordinates are new, they need to be directed.
When the situation calls for unilateral or one-sided and independent decision-making –
perhaps there is no enough time for quality input from subordinates or the subordinates may
lack information.
Limitations
Employees’/subordinates’ ideas will not be used to solve organizational problems, which in
some cases subordinates may have better ideas than the superior about a particular problem.
Subordinates would not be motivated, i.e. It may suppress individual initiative
Poor implementation of decisions
a. Democratic/Participative Leadership Style: In this leadership style, the manager involves
subordinates in making organizational decisions, shares problems with them and shares
authority to reach a decision. Subordinates take part in the decision-making process through
consultation. The leader delegates a great deal of authority while retaining ultimate
responsibility. Active two-way communication (upward and downward) exists. The democrat
leader uses Theory Y assumption as his/her philosophical base for leadership.
Limitations
Subordinates may be too involved to influence the manager even when there is no need.
The manager may not be able to influence the subordinates to the extent needed.
However, the major advantage of this leadership style is that, it enhances personal commitment
through participation. The advantages of democratic leadership style are the disadvantages of the
autocratic leadership style after we make them opposite.
b. Laissez-Faire/Free-Rein Leadership Style: In this leadership style, leaders generally give the
group complete freedom, provide the necessary materials, participate only to answer
questions, and avoid decision-making whenever possible. The leader either sets limits and the
followers work out their own problems, or the individuals set their own goals. In this style,
leaders depend largely on subordinates to set their own goals and the means of achieving
them, and they see their role as one of aiding the operations of followers by furnishing them
information and acting primarily as a contact with the groups external environment, i.e. the
leader’s role is to serve as a logistics specialist or representative of the group to outside
groups. The leader denies responsibility and abdicates authority to the group.
The application of Laissez-Faire style can be found with individuals or groups that the manager
views as being knowledgeable, independent, or motivated. Additionally, if the work group is
composed of high achievers, or is highly research oriented, this style has potential benefits.
Primarily horizontal communication among peers exists.
Limitations
Group may drift aimlessly in the absence of direction from leader.
It may make things out of control.
Advantages
It gives quite freedom for subordinates
It gives much responsibility and self guidance for subordinates
It permits self-starters to do things as they see fit without leader
c. Situational Leadership style: The situational leadership style states that for a manager to be
democrat, autocratic or laissez-faire, situations force him/her.
Motivation
The Concept of Motivation
The term motivation derived from the Latin word movere meaning “to move.” In the present
context, motivation represents “those psychological processes that cause arousal, direction, and
persistence of voluntary actions that are goal oriented. Managers need to understand these
psychological processes if they are to successfully guide employees toward accomplishing
organizational objectives.
Motivation is an internal force that energizes behavior, gives direction to behavior, and underlies
the tendency to persist. This definition of motivation recognizes that in order to achieve goals,
individuals must be sufficiently stimulated and energetic, must have a clear focus or end in mind,
and must be willing and able to commit their energy for a long enough period of time to realize
their aim. Since the leading function of management involves influencing others to work toward
organizational goals, motivation is an important aspect of that function.
Because motivation is an internal force, we cannot measure the motivation of others directly.
Instead, we typically infer whether or not other individuals are motivated by watching their
behavior. As managers analyze their workforces, they can always see some people who
outperform others of equal skill. A closer look might reveal instances in which a person with
outstanding talents is consistently outperformed by someone having lesser talents. Why? These
latter employees appear willing to exert more effort, to try harder, to accomplish their goals,
often these hard workers are described by their bosses as “motivated employees.” Motivated
individuals work hard, persist and are goal oriented.
Motivators
Motivators are things, which induce an individual to perform. While motivation reflects wants,
motivators are the identified rewards, or incentives that sharpen the derive to satisfy these wants.
They are also the means by which conflicting needs may be reconciled or one need heightened so
that it will be given priority over another. A motivator is something that influences an
individual’s behavior. It makes a difference in what a person will do.
The Motivation Cycle
The starting point in this cycle is a need or a deficiency or a state of felt deprivation an individual
experiences at a particular time. This deficiency causes tension (physiological or psychological
in balance), which will be modified by one’s culture and personality to cause certain wants
leading /motivating the individual to some kind of goal directed behavior. This leads to
satisfaction and one cycle of motivation will be completed.
The Motivation Process
1
Need deficiency
satisfaction
From this we can understand that deficiency triggers a drive for need satisfaction, which causes
an individual to take a certain course of action that will alleviate a need and reduce a drive. The
need for food for example will result in hunger and hunger will drive or motivate the individual
to take action (eating food), which will achieve the goal. This goal attainment will restore the
physiological or psychological balance and reduce or cutoff the drive for food.
Motivation Vs Satisfaction
Motivation refers to the drive and effort to satisfy a want or a goal. Satisfaction refers to the
contentment experienced when a want is satisfied. In other words, motivation implies a drive
toward an outcome, and satisfaction is the outcome already experienced.
Motivation
Theories of Motivation
Carrot and Stick Approach
This metaphor relates the use of rewards and penalties in order to induce desired human
behavior. It comes from the old story that to make a donkey move one must put a carrot in front
of it and if it does not move beat it with stick from behind.
Despite all the researches and theories of motivation that have come to the fore in recent years,
reward and punishment are still recognized/considered by strong motivators. For centuries,
however, they were too often thought of as the only forces that could motivate people.
Carrot - money in the form of pay or bonuses.
Stick – fear such as fear of loss of job, loss of income, reduction of bonuses demotion or some
other penalty.
Failures of carrot and stick approach
1. Carrot can be obtained by any member of the organization without differentiation in
performance – through such practices as salary increases and promotion by seniority, automatic
“merit” increases, and executive bonuses not based on individual manager performance. It is as
simple as this: If a person put a donkey in a pen full of carrots and then stood outside with a
carrot, would the donkey be encouraged to come out of the pen?
2. Stick in the form of fear is not the best kind of motivating factor. It often gives rise to
defensive or refectory behavior, such as union organization, poor quality work, executive
indifference, failure of a manager to take any risk in decision-making, or even dishonesty.
Money as a Motivator
Even if under the carrot and stick approach money as a sole motivator has been criticized, it is
used as a motivator (motivating factor) but not the only one. Money can be used as a motivator
under the following conditions.
For people who have low-level standards of living and who badly need it for their life. When the
amount is so significant that the organization uses it for competitive purposes.
When the payment is so differentiated that even at equal position discriminatory payment is
made for people with different levels of performance.
Based on the above premises, Maslow proposed that human needs form a five-level
hierarchy.
a. Physiological Needs
These are the basic needs for sustaining human life itself, such as food, water, air, shelter, sleep,
etc. Maslow took the position that until these needs are satisfied to the degree necessary to
maintain life, other needs will not motivate people. In other words, As Maslow points out, a
person lacking food, love and esteem wants food more than he/she wants acceptance or prestige.
These other needs would be unimportant. In the working environment, management tries to
satisfy these needs primarily through salary and by eliminating threats to physical safety.
b. Safety /Security Needs
When physiological needs are satisfied, safety needs become a priority as a motivator. Safety
needs include freedom from fear and anxiety, job security, desires for retirement and insurance
programs and so on. As with physiological needs, management attempts to satisfy safety needs
primarily through salary.
c. Social/ Love/ Affiliation Needs
Once we feel reasonably safe and secure, we turn our attention to relationships with others in
order to fulfill our belongingness needs, which involve the desire to affiliate with and be
accepted by others i.e. the need for friendship, companionship, and a place in a group. Love
needs include both giving and receiving. These needs are met by frequent interaction with fellow
workers and acceptance by others.
d. Esteem Needs
Esteem needs include the desire for both self-esteem (self respect) and public esteem, and
recognition by others. These needs take two different forms. First, we have a need for
competency, confidence and independence. We also want the prestige, status, recognition and
appreciation that others bestow on us. Satisfying esteem needs produces self-worth-pride, self-
confidence, and true sense of importance; not satisfying them produces feelings of inability and
inadequacy- feeling of inferiority, weakness and helplessness. Esteem needs can be met in an
organization through recognition by peers and superiors of the person’s work, by acquiring
organizational titles and by the accomplishment of work projects.
e. Self-Actualization/Realization Needs
Refers to the need for fulfillment, the desire to become what one is capable of becoming-to
maximize one’s potential and to accomplish something. For the athlete, it may be breaking a
world’s record; for the research scientist, it may be finding a cure for HIV/AIDS; and for the
physical therapist, it may be the satisfaction of helping a child walk or laugh for the first time. In
other words, these needs differ greatly from person to person.
Maslow’s theory suggested that people must satisfy lower-level (physiological needs) before
working toward higher-level needs. Only when physiological, security, and social needs have
been more or less satisfied do people seek esteem. This theory also suggests that if a lower-level
need is suddenly reactivated, the individual will try to satisfy that need rather than higher-level
needs.
Maslow’s hierarchy, although intuitively appealing and frequently used in management training,
has not found widespread support from management researchers. Beyond the first two basic
needs, people vary in their need emphasis. Some may seek social-need satisfaction, while others
may emphasize esteem needs or self-actualization needs. Thus, each individual may respond
differently to organizational characteristics. Moreover, the steps in Maslow’s hierarchy may not
be necessarily experienced in a sequential manner. People may have more than one need at the
same time. Situations detect which needs are most important at a given point in time.
motivators are absent, workers are neutral toward work, but when motivators are present,
workers are highly motivated and satisfied. Herzberg labeled the factors that led to job
dissatisfaction as hygienes and found they are related more to the work setting, or job context,
than to job content. These factors do not necessarily motivate employees to excel, but their
absence may be a potential source of dissatisfaction, low morale, and high turnover. When
hygiene factors are poor, work is dissatisfying. However, good hygiene factors simply remove
the dissatisfaction; they do not by themselves cause people to become highly satisfied and
motivated in their work.
Thus, to the degree that motivators are present in a job, satisfaction will occur, when absent,
motivators do not lead to dissatisfaction. And, to the degree that hygienes are absent from a job,
dissatisfaction will occur, when present hygienes prevent dissatisfaction but do not lead to
satisfaction.
Communication in Organizations
Communication is the process of transmitting information among two or more people. It is the
glue that holds organizations together. Communication assists organizational member to
accomplish both individual and organizational goals, implement and respond to organizational
change, coordinate organizational activities, and engage in virtually all organizational relevant
behaviors. It would be extremely difficult to find an aspect of a manager's job that does not
involve communication. In other words communication is unavoidable in an organization's
functioning. By its very nature a manager's job requires communication. The success of every
manager and every organization depends on communication because in any undertaking
involving two or more persons, it is essential for the coordination of individual activities.
Informal Communication
It is a communication, which is not deliberately designed by the organization. It is rather
created by informal groups in order to satisfy their need to interact and share information
among themselves. In the informal communication, information flows in unstructured and
unpredictable ways. In other words, it is a structure less network. Informal communication
channel is commonly termed as grapevine because of its structure less direction of flow.
Normally the information which flow in grave vine is considered to be secret or confidential.
Definition of controlling
Controlling is the process through which managers assure that actual activities conform to
planned activities.
Controlling is the process of regulating organizational activities so that actual performance
conforms to expected organizational standards and goals.
It is checking current performance against predetermined standards contained in the plans.
Importance of Controlling
All the good planning efforts and brilliant ideas in the world do little good if a firm has no
system of managing control. Control, therefore, is an essential part of effective organizational
management. Specifically, control helps an organization adapt to changing conditions, limit
magnification of errors and provide the means to monitor performance.
Planning chooses goals and maps out the necessary strategy and tactics. Controlling attempts
to prevent failure (and to promote success) by providing the means to monitor the
performances of individuals, departments, divisions, and the entire organization.
The controlling process is closely associated with the other three functions of management:
planning, organizing and leading. It builds most directly on the planning function by providing
the means for monitoring and making adjustment in performance so that plan can be realized.
Still, controlling also supports the organizing and leading functions by helping ensure those
resources are channeled toward organizational objectives. A combination of well-planned
objectives, strong organization, capable direction and motivation has little probability of success
unless there exists an adequate system of control. Planning, organizing, staffing and directing
must be monitored to maintain their effectiveness and efficiency.
Generally, standards serve three major purposes related to employee behavior. For one thing,
standards enable employees to understand what is expected and how their work will be
evaluated. This helps employees do an effective job. For another, standards provide a basis for
detecting job difficulties related to personal limitations of organization members. Such limitation
can be based on a lack of ability, training, or experience or on any other job-related deficiency
that prevents an individual from performing properly on the job. Timely identification of
deficiencies makes it possible to take corrective action before the difficulties become serious and
possibly irresolvable. Finally, standards help reduce the potential negative effects of goal
incongruence. Goal incongruence is a condition in which there are major incompatibilities
between goals of an organization member and those of the organization. Such incompatibilities
can occur for a variety of reasons, such as lack of support for organizational objectives (e.g. an
employee views the job as temporary and attempts to do the minimum), and often result in
behaviors that are incompatible with reaching organizational goals. One common manifestation
of goal incongruence is employee theft, which includes wasting an organization's resources, as
well as taking equipment, materials and money.
There are three types of standards: performance standards, corollary standards and standards of
conduct.
Performance standards deal with quality, quantity, cost and time.
Corollary standards support a given level of performance. These include minimum personnel
requirements and adequate physical resources, such as when a company knows it will need at
least five hundred workers and well-equipped factory to produce a certain number of
terminals. Standards of conduct are moral and ethical criteria that shape the behavioral
climate of the work place. They originate from law, custom and religious beliefs.
Examples of standards: Producing 800,000 units per year, increasing market share by 20%,
cutting costs by 15%, answering all customer complaints within 24 hours.
Measuring Actual Performance: Once standards are determined, the next step is measuring
performance. For a given standard, a manager must decide both how to1 measure actual
performance and how often2 to do so.
Comparing Performance against Standards: This is a step where comparison is made between
the “what is” and the “what should be.” Managers often base their comparisons on
information provided in reports (oral and written) that summarize planned versus actual
results, and by working around work areas and observing conditions, a practice sometimes
referred to as Management by Wondering Around (MBWA). The purpose of comparing
actual performance against intended performance is, of course, to determine if corrective
action is needed.
Consequently, the comparison result may show that the actual performance exceeds (positive
deviation), meets (zero deviation), or falls below (negative deviation) expectations (standards).
Accordingly, if performance fulfills expectations (meets standards), no control problem exists.
However, if performance exceeds or fails to meet expectations, further investigation is required
to determine the cause. Performance that exceeds expectations may mean either superior talent or
inappropriately set standards. Performance that fails to meet expectation may likely mean
inappropriately set standards, poor talent or improper use of resources. The key question in both
cases will be, “How much variation from standards is acceptable before action is taken?” The
answer to this question will lead to the development of ranges defining upper and lower limits.
And performance outside of acceptable range servers as a red flag calling for taking the
necessary corrective action.
The managerial principle of exception states that control is enhanced by concentrating on
exceptions, or significant deviations from the expected result or standard. Therefore, in
comparing performance with standards managers need to direct attention to the exception, and by
doing so, managers can save time and effort.
Taking Corrective Action (on time): The corrective action to be taken depends up on the type
of deviation that exists. When performance exactly meets (deviation of zero) or exceeds
(positive deviation) the standards set, usually no corrective action is necessary. However,
1
1 The means of measuring performance will depend on the standards that have been set.
2 The period of measurement generally depends upon the importance of the goal to the organization, how quickly
the situation is likely to change, and the difficulty and expense of rectifying a problem if one were to occur.
managers do need to consider recognizing the positive performance. The type of recognition
given can vary from a verbal “well done” for a routine achievement to more substantial
rewards, such as bonuses, training opportunities, or pay raises, for major achievements or
consistently good work. Yet, favorable deviations should be examined to understand such
success. When standards are not meet, managers must carefully assess the reason why and
take corrective action. During this evaluation, managers often personally check the standards
and the related performance measures to determine whether these are still realistic.
Sometimes, managers may conclude that the standards are, in fact, inappropriate-usually
because of changing conditions-and that corrective action to meet standards is therefore not
desirable. More often, though, corrective actions are needed to reach standards. The
standards may have been based on historical data which may be inappropriate to current
conditions. In such instances, the past is a poor basis on which to predict the future.
Similarly, the use of comparative standards may prove to be problematic since no two
organizations are alike.
In taking corrective actions, managers must carefully avoid two types of errors: taking corrective
action when no action is necessary and failing to take corrective action when it is clearly needed.
Types of Controlling
In addition to determining the areas they want to control, managers need to consider the types of
controls that they wish to use. Based on the time period in which control is applied in relation to
the operation being performed, or the stage of productive cycle in which controlling is carried
out, there are three basic types of controls: preventive, concurrent, and feedback. Thus, an
organization’s performance can be monitored and controlled at three points: before, during, or
after an activity is completed.
Preventive/Steering/ preliminary / Input Control: Preventive control focuses on the regulation
of inputs to ensure that they meet the standards necessary for the transformation process. It
attempts to monitor the quality and/or quantity of resources (financial, physical, human and
information) before they become part of the system. Preventive control is future oriented and
takes place before the operation begins. It focuses on prevention in order to preclude later
serious difficulties in the production process - its aim is to prevent problems before they
arise. Nevertheless, since preventive control can’t cover every possible contingency, other
type of controls may also be needed.
E.g. Entrance exams for colleges and universities, policies, rules, procedures, proper selection
and training of employees, inspecting raw materials, the implementation of induction and
orientation programs-save trial and error cost, frustration of employee. Preventive control comes
from an old saying “A gram of prevention is worth a kg of cure.”
Concurrent/Screening/ Yes-No/Checking Control: Concurrent control involves the regulation
of ongoing activities that are part of the transformational process to ensure that they conform
to organizational standards. It is designed to detect and anticipate deviations from standards
at various points throughout the processes, i.e. the controlling is carried out during the actual
transformation process. The emphasis here is on identifying difficulties in the productive
process that could result in faulty outputs. Because concurrent controls involve the
monitoring of ongoing activities, they are the only controls that can cope with contingencies
(unexpected events) that cannot be anticipated. When contingencies arise involving activities
in a transformation process, a yes/no decision is required. That is, decision must be made
whether to continue as before or follow an alternative course, or take corrective action, or
stop work altogether. In this way, concurrent controls allow adjustments to be made while
work is being done.
E.g. On the job training, on the spot observation, mid term exams, tests, quizzes
Feedback/Post-Action/ Output Control: As the name indicates post action control focuses on
the end results of the process. It is regulation exercised after the product (goods or services)
has been completed in order to ensure that the final output meets organizational goals and
standards. The information derived is not used for corrective action on a project because it
has been completed.
The feedback control provides information for a manager to examine and apply to future
activities that are similar to the present one. That is why it is called “historical results guide
future actions.” The purpose of feedback control is to help prevent mistakes in the future and
also it can be used as a base for reward; and in cases where other (preliminary & concurrent)
controls are too costly.
E.g. Performance evaluation, financial statement analysis, final exams
Cybernetic and Non-cybernetic Controls
A basic control process can be either cybernetic or non-cybernetic, depending on the degree to
which human discretion is part of the system. A cybernetic control system is a self-regulating
control system that, once it is put into operation, can automatically monitor the situation and take
corrective action when necessary. E.g. computerized inventory system, a heating system
controlled by a thermostat. A non-cybernetic control system is a control system that relies on
human discretion as a basic part of its process.
Characteristics of Effective Control System
Controls may have many different characteristics, but some of the most important are:
Future–Oriented: To be effective, control systems need to help regulate future events, rather
than fix blame for past events. A well designed control system focuses on letting managers
know how work is progressing toward unit objectives, pinpointing unforeseen opportunities
that might be developed – all aids to future action
Multidimensional: In most cases, control systems need to be multidimensional in order to
capture the major relevant performance factors, such as, quality, quantity, overhead, etc.
Economically Realistic (Cost Effective): The cost of implementing a control system should
be less, or at most, equal to the benefits derived from the control system. The benefits
received from controls should off-set their expenses.
Accurate: Since control systems provide the basis for future actions, accuracy is vital.
Control data that are inaccurate may be worse than no control at all, since managers may
make poor decisions on the basis of faulty data they believe to be accurate. An inaccurate
data from a control system can cause the organization to take action that will either fail to
correct a problem or create a problem when none existent. Evaluating the accuracy of the
information they receive is one of the most important control tasks that managers face.
Acceptable to Organization Members: Control systems operate best when they are accepted
by the organization members who are affected by them. Otherwise, members may take
actions to override and undermine controls; i.e. controls will not work unless people want
them to. Too many, arbitrary, too few and too rigid controls often cause the satisfaction and
motivation of employees to decline.
Timely: Control systems are designed to provide data on the state of a given production cycle
or process as of a specific time. In order for managers and employees to respond promptly to
irregularities, control systems must provide relevant information soon enough to allow
corrective action before there are serious consequences.
Reliability and Validity: Controls not only must be dependable (reliable), but also must
measure what they intend to measure (must be valid). When controls can’t be relied on and
are invalid, they are unlikely to be trusted and can lead to very bad consequences.
Over-control Vs Under-control
Since excessive amount of control can make the occurrence of dysfunctional aspects of control
systems more likely, managers need to avoid over control. Over-control is the limiting of
individual job autonomy to such a point that it seriously inhibits effective job performance. At
the same time, managers need to avoid going too far in the other direction, which results in a
situation of under-control. Under-control is the granting of autonomy to an employee to such a
point that the organization loses its ability to direct the individual's efforts toward achieving
organizational goals.
Determining the appropriate amount of control that should exist in organizations is a significant
management decision. With the appropriate amount of control, a manager can be reasonably
certain that no major unpleasant surprises will occur and that employees will achieve
organizational goals.