Lien
Lien
In law, a lien (UK /ˈliːən/ or US /ˈliːn/) is a form of security interest granted over an item of
property to secure the payment of a debt or performance of some other obligation. The owner of
the property, who grants the lien, is referred to as the lienor and the person who has the benefit
of the lien is referred to as the lienee.
The etymological root is Anglo-French lien, loyen "bond", "restraint", from Latin ligamen, from
ligare "to bind".
In the United States, the term lien generally refers to a wide range of encumbrances and would
include other forms of mortgage or charge. In the USA, a lien characteristically refers to non-
possessory security interests (see generally: Security interest—categories).
In other common-law countries, the term lien refers to a very specific type of security interest,
being a passive right to retain (but not sell) property until the debt or other obligation is
discharged. In contrast to the usage of the term in the USA, in other countries it refers to a purely
possessory form of security interest; indeed, when possession of the property is lost, the lien is
released.[1] However, common-law countries also recognize a slightly anomalous form of
security interest called an "equitable lien" which arises in certain rare instances.
Despite their differences in terminology and application, there are a number of similarities
between liens in the USA and elsewhere in the common-law world.
United States
Liens can be consensual or non-consensual (also termed voluntary or involuntary in different
states) Consensual liens are imposed by a contract between the creditor and the debtor:
mortgage
chattel mortgage
Nonconsensual liens typically arise by statute or by the operation of the common law. Those
laws give a creditor the right to impose a lien on an item of real property or a chattel by the
existence of the relationship of creditor and debtor. Those liens include
Perfecting a lien is an important part of the task of protecting the secured creditor's interest in the
property. A perfected lien is valid against bona fide purchasers of property, and even against a
trustee in bankruptcy; an unperfected lien may not be.
In the United States, references to an "equitable lien" is a right, enforceable only in equity, to
have a demand satisfied out of a particular fund or specific property without having possession
of the fund or property. An equitable lien is actually a legal remedy, rather than a security
interest created in contemplation of or in support of a transaction. In U.S. law, such liens
characteristically arise in four circumstances:[2]
1. when an occupant of land, believing in good faith to be the owner of the land, makes
improvements, repairs or other expenditure that permanently increases the land's value;
2. when one of two or more joint owners makes expenditures of the kind described above;
3. when a tenant for life completes permanent and beneficial improvements to the estate
begun earlier by the testator; and
4. when land or other property is transferred subject to the payment of debts, legacies,
portions or annuities to third persons.
Common-law lien
Common-law liens are divided into special liens and general liens. A special lien, the more
common kind, requires a close connection between the property and the service rendered. A
special lien can only be exercised in respect of fees relating to the instant transaction; the lienee
cannot use the property held as security for past debts as well. A general lien affects all of the
property of the lienor in the possession of the lienee, and stands as security for all of the debts of
the lienor to the lienee. A special lien can be extended to a general lien by contract, and this is
commonly done in the case of carriers.[3] A common-law lien only gives a passive right to retain;
there is no power of sale which arises at common law,[4] although some statutes have also
conferred an additional power of sale,[5] and it is possible to confer a separate power of sale by
contract.
The common-law liens are closely aligned to the so-called "common callings", but are not co-
extensive with them.
A common-law lien is a very limited type of security interest. Apart from the fact that it only
amounts to a passive right to retain, a lien cannot be transferred;[6] it cannot be asserted by a third
party to whom possession of the goods is given to perform the same services that the original
party should have performed;[7] and if the chattel is surrendered to the lienor, the lien entitlement
is lost forever[8] (except for where the parties agree that the lien shall survive a temporary re-
possession by the lienor). A lienee who sells the chattel unlawfully may be liable in conversion
as well as surrendering the lien.[9]
Equitable lien
In common-law countries, equitable liens give rise to unique and difficult issues. An equitable
lien is a non-possessory security right conferred by operation of law, which is similar in effect to
an equitable charge. It differs from a charge in that it is non-consensual. It is conferred only in
very limited circumstances, the most common (and least ambiguous) of which is in relation to
the sale of land; an unpaid vendor has an equitable lien over the land for the purchase price,
notwithstanding that the purchaser has gone into occupation of the property. It is seen as a
counterweight to the equitable rule which confers a beneficial interest in the land on the
purchaser once contracts are exchanged for purchase.
It is a matter of conjecture how far equitable liens extend outside of the unpaid vendor's lien.
Equitable liens have been held to exist in a number of cases involving choses in action, but not
yet in relation to chattels.[10] The Australian courts have been the most receptive towards
equitable liens in relation to personal property (see Hewett v Court (1983) 57 ALJR 211, but a
review of the cases still leaves a lack of clarity in relation to the principles upon which an
equitable lien will be imposed.
Although arguably not liens as such, two other forms of encumbrance are sometimes referred to
as liens.
Statutory liens
Certain statutes provide for a passive right to retain property against its owner as security for
obligations. For example, section 88 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 of the United Kingdom
permits an airport to detain aircraft for unpaid airport charges and aviation fuel. Although this
right has been treated as a lien under UK insolvency law,[12] it has been argued that such
statutory rights are not in fact liens, but rights analogous to liens,[13] although some might say
that this is a distinction without a difference.
Contractual liens[edit]
It has also been argued that an agreement by contract that one party may retain the goods of
another party until paid is not a lien,[13] as under the common law, liens could only be non-
consensual. However, it appears that under insolvency law, such rights will be treated as liens
even if they are not expressed to be liens.[12]
Maritime liens
A maritime lien is a lien on a vessel, given to secure the claim of a creditor who provided
maritime services to the vessel or who suffered an injury from the vessel's use. Maritime liens
are sometimes referred to as tacit hypothecation. Maritime liens have little in common with other
liens under the laws of most jurisdictions.
The maritime lien has been described as "one of the most striking peculiarities of Admiralty
law".[14] A maritime lien constitutes a security interest upon ships of a nature otherwise unknown
to the common law or equity. It arises purely by operation of law and exists as a claim upon the
property concerned, both secret and invisible, often given priority by statute over other forms of
registered security interest.[15] Although characteristics vary under the laws of different countries,
it can be described as:
1. a privileged claim,
2. upon maritime property,
3. for service to it or damage done by it,
4. accruing from the moment that the claim attaches,
5. travelling with the property unconditionally,
6. enforced by an action in rem.[14]
Nomenclature
Throughout the world, there are a large number of different types and sub-divisions of liens. Not
all of the following liens exist in all legal systems that recognize the concept of a lien. The
following are descriptions that are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Types of lien include
Notes
1. Hatton v Car Maintenance' [1915] 1 Ch 621
2. Black's Law Dictionary (8th ed.)
3. George Baker Ltd v Eynon [1974] 1 WLR 462
4. Thames Iron Works v Patent Derrick (1860) 1 J&H 93
5. In the United Kingdom, see for example, Innkeepers Act 1878
6. Legg v Evans (1840) 6 M&W 36
7. Pennington v Reliance Motors Ltd [1923] 1 KB 127
8. Hatton v Car Maintenance [1915] 1 Ch 621
9. Mulliner v Florence (1878) 3 QBD 484
10. Transport and General Credit v Morgan [1939] 2 All ER 17
11. See Phillips J, "Equitable Liens—A search for a unifying principle" in Palmer & McKendrick, Interests in
Goods (2nd ed.)
12. Bristol Airport v Powdrill [1990] Ch 744
13. Michael Bridge, Personal Property Law (2nd ed.)
14. Griffith Price, The Law of Maritime Liens (1940)
15. Bankers Trust v Todd Shipyards, The Halcyon Isle [1981] AC 221
16. Brister, Austin. "MINERAL LIENS: COLLECTING UNPAID DEBT FOR OILFIELD SERVICE
COMPANIES". OilandGasLawDigest.com. Retrieved 30 January 2014.
17. M Simkovic (2009). "Secret Liens and the Financial Crisis of 2008". Social Science Research Network
(SSRN). Retrieved June 29, 2011.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lien
April, 2014