SIM336 January 2013 Assignment - Formatted
SIM336 January 2013 Assignment - Formatted
- January 2013 -
Individual Assignment
Case Study – ‘The Comeback of Caterpillar,
1985-2001’ in De Wit & Meyer
(2004:755-772)
Introduction:
This individual assignment will be assessed by means of a 3,000 word report. The assignment has been
designed to allow you to develop and use your knowledge and skills in understanding key strategic
issues relating to strategic renewal in a global industry. You will be required to apply the strategic
concepts and analytical techniques studied in this module. All the learning outcomes below will be
assessed:
1. Ability to analyse the complexity of organisations and their environments
2. Demonstrate an understanding of the complexity of the relationships between an organisation
and its environment
3. Ability to evaluate existing models against practices of real organisations
Please note:
1. All work must adhere to the University regulations on ‘Cheating, Collusion and Plagiarism’
which are provided as an Appendix in your Programme handbook. See your Tutor for guidance
on ‘Harvard Referencing Style’, and avoiding ‘Plagiarism’.
2. A hard copy, an electronic copy on CD or DVD Rom, of the assignment must be handed into
your Local Study Centre on or before the appointed date under cover of the Sunderland Business
School Feedback Sheet.
3. Submission Date: Monday 7th January 2013
Task
Your task is to carry out a critical analysis and evaluation of strategy development in a well established
international manufacturer of heavy construction equipment, using the information provided and other
materials researched. You will be expected to select and apply appropriate theories, techniques and
models studied during the module whilst having regard to the practical aspects of strategic renewal.
Your assignment should be presented in a business report format and should be within the range 3,000
+/- 500 words (excluding executive summary, references and relevant appendices). The report should
include a title page and executive summary and be fully and consistently referenced, using the Harvard
Referencing style. You must also submit a CD or DVD Rom containing an electronic version of the
report. This should be clearly labelled with your name, your course and the name of the case study.
It is recommended that you research information additional to the case study to support your
arguments. This may be obtained from a diverse range of sources and you are encouraged to research
the issues in whichever way you deem appropriate.
Assessment Criteria
In the event of failing this individual assignment, normal referral / deferral procedures will apply. This
assignment carries a weighting of 100%. The assessment will focus on the level of ANALYSIS carried
out. That is, the application of THEORETICAL CONCEPTS studied in the module to the ‘practical’
case study presented. In other words, you should proceed beyond a DESCRIPTION of the company
and its actions. You should be analysing ‘why’ rather than describing ‘what’. The assignment will be
assessed and moderated by the module team in accordance with the marks allocated to each of the
questions detailed below. 10% of the marks are set aside for the ‘report style’ criteria.
Academic Rigour
your ability to isolate the key strategic issues
the coherence and depth of the analysis of those issues
the ability to analyse the strategy context within which companies operate
the ability to critically review and evaluate strategic decisions made by companies
Methodology
the use of relevant evidence, from material provided and personal research to support any
statements made
the appropriateness of the methods used and theoretical models and frameworks applied
the breadth and depth of research undertaken
Evaluation of data
the ability to make sound recommendations or conclusions arising from the analysis
the soundness of arguments put forward
Format of Report
the summary of arguments
report layout and format
use of illustrative material and evidence to support arguments
the appropriateness of length
the quantity and accuracy of referencing
Instructions:
ANSWER ALL THREE QUESTIONS
You are expected to use the information in the case study ‘The Comeback of Caterpillar (1985-
2001’ by Cohen, I. cited in De Wit, B. and Meyer, R. (2004) Strategy: Process, Content,
Context. An International Perspective: Thomson Learning, London, Third Edition, pp. 755-772,
and your own understanding of the process of strategy, strategy content and strategy context and
your own additional research information.
Your answer should be based on critical ‘internal’ and ‘external’ environmental analyses using
appropriate analytical techniques.
Question One:
a) What were the major internal and external factors forcing Caterpillar to renew its strategy in
the period 1985-2001? (20 marks)
b) Highlight the measures the company took to solve its problems during this time period.
(10 marks)
Question Two:
a) Which major sources of resistance against change can be identified at Caterpillar during the
reign of CEO’s Schaefer and Fites? (20 marks)
b) What would you expect to be the major sources of resistance faced by CEO Barton? (10 marks)
Question Three:
a) What were the major revolutionary changes that shaped Caterpillar’s business system and
organisational system between 1985-2001? Which evolutionary changes took place during
the same period of time? (20 marks)
b) What seems to be the dominant perspective at Caterpillar in respect of strategic change?
(10 marks)
Suggested Reading:
Textbooks:
De Wit, B. and Meyer, R. (2004) – Strategy Process, Content, and Context: An International Perspective,
3rd Edition, Thomson Learning
Hofstede, G. (1993) ‘Cultural constraints in management theories’, in De Wit, B. and Meyer, R. (2004)
Strategy Process, Content, Context, 3rd Edition, Thomson, London; cited in SIM336 Module Workbook,
2011, Unit 7, page 203).
Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R. (2005) Exploring Corporate Strategy: Text and Cases, 7th
Edition, Financial Times, Prentice Hall.
Lynch, R. (2006) Corporate Strategy, Fourth Edition, Financial Times, Prentice Hall.
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. and Lampel, J. (1998) Strategy Safari, Financial Times, Prentice Hall
Whittington, R. (2000) What is Strategy and does it matter? Thompson Learning.