Gage R&R Part Number
Average & Range Method 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sum
Appraiser 1 Trial 1
Enter your data here-> Trial2
Trial3
Trial4 Xbar1 Reference
Trial 5 12.500
Total Bias
Average-Ap Rbar1 #VALUE!
Range1
Appraiser 2 Trial 1
Enter your data here-> Trial2
Trial3
Trial4 Xbar2 Reference
Trial 5 12.500
Total Bias
Average-Ap Rbar2 #VALUE!
Range2
Appraiser Trial 1
Enter your data here-> Trial2
Trial3
Trial4 Xbar3 Reference
Trial 5 12.500
Total Bias
Average-Ap Rbar3
Range3
Range Average #DIV/0! Constants
XDiff 0.0000 5 Trials 4 Trials 3 Trials 2 Trials # Trials 0
UCL Err:522 2.11 2.28 2.58 3.27 D4 Err:522 UCL represents the limit of the individual R's
LCL 0.0000 0 0 0 0 D3 Err:522 Circle those beyond the limit.
Repeatability(EV) Err:522 0.577 0.729 1.023 1.88 A2 Err:522 Identify and correct causes
Reproducibility(AV) 0.0000 0.4299 0.4857 0.5908 0.8862 K1 Err:522 LCL = 0 D3=0 for up to 7 trials
Gage Capability(R&R) Err:522 0.7071 0.5231 K2 0.7071
Spec Tolerance 0.012 2 Ops 3 Operators
Acceptability(%) Err:522 Err:522
% Using % Using Err:522
AIAG - Automotive Industry TV Tolerance
EV (Equipment Variation) Err:522 Equipment Variation (EV)
%EV Err:522 Err:522 # Parts #Trials #Ops % of Total Variation (TV)
AV: (Appraiser Variation) 0.00000 0 0 2 Appraiser Variation(AV)
%AV 0.0% 0% % of Total Variation (TV)
R&R (Gage Capability) Err:522 Repeatability and Reproducibility (R&R)
%R&R Err:522 Err:522 % of Total Variation (TV)
PV (Part Variation) #VALUE! Part Variation (PV)
%PV #VALUE! #VALUE! % of Total Variation (TV)
TV (Total Variation) Err:522 Total Variation (TV)
Calculate GageR&R using Anova With Interaction Without Interaction
Anova Source df SS MS F P F P
Appraiser 1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Parts -1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Appraiser x Part -1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Gage w AP Interaction 0 #VALUE! #VALUE!
Gage w/o AP Interacti -1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Total -1 #VALUE!
Estimate of % Study %
Variance Std. Dev 5.15* Stdev Variation Contribution
Repeatability #VALUE! #VALUE! EV #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Appraiser #DIV/0! #DIV/0! AV #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
AppraiserxPart #DIV/0! #DIV/0! INT #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
R&R #VALUE! #VALUE! R&R #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Part #DIV/0! #DIV/0! PV #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
TV #VALUE!
Part by Appraiser Plot (Stacked)
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6 Average-Appraiser 1
Averagge
Average-Appraiser 2
0.5
Average-Appraiser 3
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Part
Part by Appraiser Plot
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
Averagge
0.5 Row 9
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appraiser 2
Appraiser 1 Appraiser 3
Range of Parts by Appraiser (Stacked)
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
Range1
Range
0.5 Range2
Range3
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Parts
Range of Parts by Appraiser
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
Range
0.5
Row 10
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appraiser 2
Appraiser 1 Appraiser 3
Instructions 1. Select 10 DIFFERENT parts and at least two "appraisers" and one gage
(If you don't use enough parts, part variation will be small and magnify the appraiser/equipment variation)
2. RANDOMLY, have appraisers measure each part at least twice
3. Then enter the results of each measurement in Cells C3:L7, C11:L15, C19:L23
4. The template will automatically calculate all of the values based on your data
5. Evaluate your measurement system based on %R&R and make adjustments as required.
Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility
Measurement is one common cause of variation. Gage R&R helps improve measurement systems
If repeatability (EV - Can the same person using the same gauge measure the same thing consistently)
is larger than reproducibility, reasons include:
1. Gage instrument needs maintenance
2. Gage needs to be redesigned
3. Clamping or location needs to be improved
4. Excessive within-part variation
If reproducibility (AV-can two appraisers measure the same thing and get the same result)
is larger than repeatability, reasons include:
1. Operator needs to be better trained in how to use and read gage
2. Calibrations on gage are not clear
3. Fixture required to help operator use gage more consistently
Gage System Acceptability
%R&R<10% Gage System Okay (Most variation caused by parts, not people or equipment)
%R&R<30% May be acceptable based on importance of application and cost of gage or repair
%R&R>30% Gage system needs improvement (people and equipment cause over 1/3 of variation)
Verified using AIAG Measurement Systems Analysis 3rd Edition
<-Insert Reference Value Here
Range Method
Range Method Insert Your Data Here
Part 1 2 3 4 5 Average g
Appraiser 1 1 1 ###
Appraiser 2 1.1 1.1 d2
Range 0.1 0 0 0 0 0.02 1.41
###
GR&R 0.014184 ###
Insert Process
Standard
Deviation 0.070711 ###
%GR&R 20% ###
Page 7
Bias
t-
Reference Average/ Stdev(r) Statistic/
Value Value Bias n Mean Stdev Stdev(b) critical
6.0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #N/A #N/A
Bias #DIV/0! #N/A #N/A
95% Confidence
Lower Upper
#N/A #N/A
#N/A
Reference: AIAG MSA Version 3 pgs 85-88
Page 8
Bias
d2*/d2 df g 2 3 4 5 6 7
#N/A #N/A d2* 1.41421 1.91155 2.23887 2.48124 2.67253 2.82981
#N/A df 1 2 2.9 3.8 4.7 5.5
d2 1.12838 1.69257 2.05875 2.3593 2.53441 2.70436
t crit 95% 4.303 3.182 2.776 2.571 2.447 2.365
Version 3 pgs 85-88
Page 9
Bias
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
2.96288 3.07794 3.17905 3.26909 3.35016 3.42378 3.49116 3.55333 3.61071
6.3 7 7.7 8.3 9 9.6 10.2 10.8 11.3
2.8472 2.97003 3.07751 3.17287 3.25846 3.33598 3.40676 3.47193 3.53198
2.306 2.262 2.228 2.201 2.179 2.16 2.145 2.131 2.12
Page 10
Bias
17 18 19 20
3.66422 3.71424 3.76118 3.80537
11.9 12.4 12.9 13.4
3.58788 3.64006 3.68896 3.735
2.11 2.101 2.093 2.086
Page 11
Linearity
Part
Trials 1 2 3 4 5
1 2.7 <- Insert Your Data Here
2
3 Linearity evaluates a gauge's ab
4 to measure accurately across a
5 Imagine measuring a baseball b
6 1. at the grip
7 2. in the middle
8 3. and at the widest part
9
10
11
12
Average 2.70
Reference
Values 2.00 <- Insert Known Reference Values Here
Bias 0.70
Range 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
bias=
slope*ref+b
Slope= Err:502
b= Err:502
Goodness of
fit Err:502
Insert
Process
Variation
Linearity Err:502
%Linearity Err:502
Linearity Plot
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
Bias
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
Page 12
0.00
1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
0.50
Bias
0.40 Linearity
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
Reference Value
Page 13
Linearity
our Data Here
Linearity evaluates a gauge's ability
to measure accurately across a wide range
Imagine measuring a baseball bat:
1. at the grip
2. in the middle
3. and at the widest part
nown Reference Values Here
Page 14
Appraiser A Appraiser B Appraiser C Reference Results
Part # Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Reference Ref Value Code LSL USL
1 1 X
2 1 X 1. Enter Spec Limits Above
3 1 X 2. Have 3 appraisers accept/reject 10+ p
4 1 X 3. Enter pass/fail in columns B-J
5 1 X 4. Enter Reference value in column L
6 1 X 5. Evaluate effectiveness columns AJ-A
7 1 X
8 1 X
9 1 X
10 1 X
11 1 X
12 1 X
13 1 X
14 1 X
15 1 X
16 1 X
17 1 X
18 1 X
19 1 X
20 1 X
21 1 X
22 1 X
23 1 X
24 1 X
25 1 X
26 1 X
27 1 X
28 1 X
29 1 X
30 1 X
31 1 X
32 1 X
33 1 X
34 1 X
35 1 X
36 1 X
37 1 X
38 1 X
39 1 X
40 1 X
41 1 X
42 1 X
43 1 X
44 1 X
45 1 X
46 1 X
47 1 X
48 1 X
49 1 X
50 1 X
0 = Fail + = within spec limits
1 = Pass - = outside spec limits
x = gray area around spec limits
A-B B-C C-A A-REF B-REF C-REF
%R&R Gray zone 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
0.00000
er Spec Limits Above
e 3 appraisers accept/reject 10+ parts Crosstabulation Crosstabulation
er pass/fail in columns B-J B Total REF Total
er Reference value in column L A 0 1 A 0 1
uate effectiveness columns AJ-AV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0
C Total REF Total
B 0 1 B 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0
A Total REF Total
C 0 1 C 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0
around spec limits
Miss
Effectiveness Rate
A #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
B #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
C #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
System #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Effectiveness
Acceptable >= 90%
Marginal >=80%
Unacceptable <80%
