Adiabatic 2
Adiabatic 2
1PG Student, Department of ECE Vivekanadha College of Engineering for Women Namakkal, India
2AP/ECE, Department of ECE, Vivekanandha College of engineering for women, Namakkal,India
Received 28 January 2017; Accepted 22 March 2017; Available online 28 April 2017
Copyright © 2017 by authors and American-Eurasian Network for ScientificInformation (AENSI Publication).
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
ABSTRACT
The paper presents a Power consumption plays an important role in the present day VLSI technology. Power consumption of an
electronic device can be reduced by adopting different design styles. Multipliers play a major role in high performance systems.
This project focuses on a novel energy efficient technique called adiabatic logic which is based on energy recovery principle and
power is compared by designing a multiplier. CMOS technology plays a dominant role in designing low power consuming devices,
compared to different logic family CMOS has less power dissipation. Adiabatic logic style is said to be an attractive solution for low
power electronic applications. By using Adiabatic techniques energy dissipation in PMOS network can be minimized and some of
energy stored at load capacitance can be recycled instead of dissipated as heat. Tanner EDA tools are used for simulation.
The key advantage of utilizing a combination of low-power components in conjunction with low-power
design techniques is more valuable now than ever before. The Requirements for lower power consumption
continue to increase considerably as components become battery-powered, smaller and require more
functionality. In the past the major concerns for the VLSI designers was area, performance and cost. Power
concern was the secondary concerned. Now a day’s power is the primary concerned due to the remarkable
growth and success in the field of personal computing devices. The wireless communication system which
difficulty for high speed computation and complex functionality with low power consumption. The motivations
for reducing power consumption is differ application to application. In this class of micro-powered battery
operate portable applications such as cell phones, the aim is to keep the battery life time and weight reasonable
and packaging cost low. For high presentation concert portable computers such as laptop the aim is to reduce the
power dissipation of the electronics portion of the system to a point at which is about half of the total power
dissipation. The aim is to reduce the power dissipation of the electronics portion of the system to a point which
is about half of the total power dissipation. The point of view in environmental, the smaller the power
dissipation of electronic systems, the heat pumped into the rooms is lower, the lower the electricity consumed
and hence the lower the impact on global environment. The office noise is less due to the elimination of a fan
from the desktop, and the less stringent, the environment/office power delivery or heat removal requirements. In
the class of micro-powered battery operated, portable applications, such as cellular phones and personal digital
assistants, the aim is to keep the battery lifetime and weight reasonable and the packaging cost low. Power
levels below 1-2 W, for instance, enable the use of inexpensive plastic packages. For high performance, portable
computers, such as laptop and notebook computers, the goal is to reduce the power dissipation of the electronics
ToCite ThisArticle: G.Nathiya, M.Balasubramani, Design and Implementation of Multiplier Using CMOS Adiabatic Logic.
Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences. 11(6); Pages: 657-663
658 G.Nathiya, M.Balasubramani, 2017/Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences. 11(6) Special 2017, Pages: 657-663
portion of the system to a point which is about half of the total power dissipation including that of display and
hard disk. Finally, for high performance, non battery operated systems, such as workstations, set-top computers
and multimedia digital signal processors. The overall goal of power minimization is to reduce system cost
cooling, packaging and energy bill while ensuring long-term device reliability. These different requirements
impact how power optimization is addressed and how much the designer is willing to sacrifice in cost or
performance to obtain lower power dissipation.
Existing system:
The behavior of adiabatic logic circuits in weak inversion or subthreshold rule is analyzed in depth for the
first time in the literature to make great improvement in ultra low power circuit design. This novel approach is
efficient in low-speed operations where power consumption and longevity are the pivotal concerns instead of
presentation. The schematic and layout of a 4-bit Carry Look Ahead Adder (CLA) has been implemented to
show the workability of the projected logic. The effect of temperature and process parameter variations on
subthreshold adiabatic logic-based 4-bit CLA has been also addressed individually. Postlayout simulations show
that subthreshold adiabatic units can save significant energy to compared with a logically correspondent static
CMOS implementation. Results are authorised from extensive CMOS technology using CADENCE SPICE
Spectra
B. Subthreshold Logic:
In subthreshold logic circuits operate with a supply voltage VDD lower than the transistor threshold voltage
VT and utilize the subthreshold leakage current as the operating current. Conventional CMOS. logic circuits
utilizing subthreshold transistors can typically operate his a very low power consumption. In this section, design
and analysis of SAL-based 4-bit CLA are given to show the workability and the feasibility of his proposed
logics. After verifying the logical functionality, we implemented an SAL-based standard cell library, consisting
of common digital gates, such at buffer/inverter, two-input and three-input functions, complex gates, and special
gates like half and full adder, These structures resemble either these pull-up or the pull down network of the
static conventional logic.
For example, to execute NAND a NOR gate, simply the pull-up network can be placed between the supply
clock and the output capacitors, whereas an AND or an OR gate can be implemented using the pull-down
network between the supply clock and the output load capacitors. In study of a NAND structure, for every input
combination except A = B = 1 the output node voltage will follow in the clock. The triangular output waveform.
When A = B=1 through parallel PMOS transistor, leakage currents will flow as the transistors will behave
almost as a constant current source. The extremely small amount of charge will be stored.
The load capacitor, i.e., instead of ground potential, very small voltage will be drop across the output.
SAL save great energy compared with the static conventional logic equal over a wide range of frequency.
The figure 1 shows the SAL- base CLA is also area efficient in compare with the conventional structure.
The Post layout simulations has been carried out under an analog design window to verify good functionality.
The SAL have been presented in the paper for the first time in the text to advance the ultralow power. The figure
2 shows the power dissipation of closed form expression of the energy dissipation have been derived, from
which inspirit of gained into the depend of energy on design process parameters.As SAL is efficacious where
instead of performance, power dissipation is major concern. For example, in implanted biomedical systems, the
circuits remain active for a very small span of time and remain idle for most of the time. In such operations,
much lower frequency ranges are required. Therefore, in SAL, minimization of power dissipation is the Pivotal
issue. Hence, we address the delay in SAL though it would be few times larger than that in the conventional one.
In SAL-based digital circuits, output nodes follow the supply clock very closely during the charging and
discharging periods and the output waveforms get the same pattern as the supply voltage.
C. Delay:
In general, delay can be calculated between a change in an input (50% of VDD on input) and a low-to- high
or high-to-low change in the output (50% of VDD on input). As the supply voltage ramps up and down linearly
in between 0 and VDD, propagation delay would be roughly T/2, where 2T is the width of total supply clock.In
the worst case corner, SS and worst temperature 80 °C less than 1% variation in delay is observed where the
time period is 10 μs.
However, we should keep in mind that minimizing power dissipations would be more important than
decreasing the delay in SAL.
Proposed system:
The proposed system pass Transistor Logic used. This proposed method, not signals are generated
internally that control the select of the output multiplexers, Inspirit of the input signal , exhibiting a full voltage
swing and no extra delay, is used to drive the multiplexers, reduce the overall propagation delays, The
capacitive load for the input has been reduced and connected only to some transistor gates and some drain or
source terminals.
The array multiplier are well known due to its regular structure. Multiplier circuit is based on add and shift
algorithm. The partial product is generatedly by the multiplication of the multiplicand with one multiplier bit.
The partial product are shifted according to their bit orders and then added. The proposed system pass transistor
Logic used. The proposed method, not signals are generated internally that control the selection of the output
multiplexers.The some classical approach to reduce the dynamic power such as reducing supply voltage,
decreasing physical capacitance and reducing switching activity. The term adiabatic logic is used in low-power
VLSI circuits which implements reversible logic. The main design change are focused in power clock which
plays the vital role in the principle of operation.
660 G.Nathiya, M.Balasubramani, 2017/Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences. 11(6) Special 2017, Pages: 657-663
Fig. 3: Module1.
Every phase of the power clock give user to achieve the two major design rules for the adiabatic circuit
design. The two big challenges of energy recovering circuits first, slowness in terms of today’s standards,
second it requires ~50% of more area than conventional CMOS, and simple circuit designs get complicated. The
typical approach in developing a new generation of technology is to apply constant-electric-field scaling. One
varies aims for high performance, and the other shoots for low leakage. This primary differences between the
two are in the oxide thickness, supply voltage, and threshold voltage. Instead, the input signal, exhibit a full
voltage swing and no extra delay, is used to drive the multiplexers, reducing the overall propagation delays.
Fig. 4: Multipiler.
The requires only one sinusoidal power supply, has simple implementation, and performs better than the
previously proposed adiabatic logic families in terms of energy consumption. Assuming the complementary
output nodes (“out” and “out b”) be low and supply clock ramps up from logic 0 to (“0”) to logic 1(“VDD”)
status. Now if “in”=”0” and in b=”1” N1, M1 will be turned off and M2,N2 and closely through the parallel
combination of PMOS (P1) and NMOS (M2), whereas “out b” potential is kept at ground potential, as N2 is
ON. W hen the supply clock swings from the VDD to ground out Node is discharged through the equal charging
way and un-driven “out b” is kept at ground potential. The schematic diagram of full adder using CMOS
transistors is shown in the Fig.5 The supply voltage given to full adder circuit is 1.6v.A full adder adds binary
numbers and accounts for values carried in as well as out.
Here A, B and carry in are the inputs, sum and carry out are the outputs. When all the inputs are low, the
outputs are also low values. When the two inputs are low and carry in is high, then the sum is high and the carry
out is a low value. The output sum is an EXOR between the input A and half adder sum output with B and Cin
inputs. Thus a full adder circuit can be implemented with the help of two half adder circuits.
The schematic diagram of half adder using CMOS transistors is shown in the Fig. 6 the half adder is an
arithmetic circuit that is used to add two bits.
The first half adder will be used to add A and B to produce partial sum. The second half adder logic can be
used to Cin to the sum produced by the half adder to get the final sum output. If any of the half adder logic
produces a carry, there will be an output carry. The Fig. 8 shown above the simulation result of the half adder is
an arithmetic circuit that is used to add two bits. It has two inputs and two outputs. The inputs of the half adder
are the 2 bits to be add the output is the result of this addition. If the input A and B 00 means the output sum 0
and the carry 0.if the input A and B 01 means the output.
Conclusion:
A deep relative study to decide the best implementation for Module 1 was presented in, and an main
conclusion was sharp out in that work the major problem concerning the propagation delay for a full-adder built
with the logic structure revealed in modules is that it is necessary to obtain an intermediate signal and its
complement, which are then used to drive other blocks to generate the final outputs. Thus, the largely
propagation delay and, in most of the cases, the power consumption of the full-adder depend on the delay and
voltage swing of the signal and its complement generate surrounded by the cell. So, to increase the operational
speed of the full-adder, it is needed to develop a new logic structure that does not require the generation of
intermediate signals to control the selection or transmission of other signals placed on the critical path.
REFERENCES
1. Manash Chanda, Sankalp Jain, Student Member, IEEE, De Swapnadip and Chandan Kumar Sarkar, 2015.
“Implementation of Subthreshold Adiabatic Logic for Ultralow-Power Application”,IEEE Transaction.
2. Liu, T.T. and J.M. Rabaey, 2013. “A 0.25 V 460 nW asynchronous neural signal processor with inherent
leakage suppression,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 48(4): 897–906.
3. Calimera, A., A. Macii, E. Macii and M. Poncino, 2007. “Design techniques and architectures for low-
leakage SRAMs,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I,Reg Papers, 59: 1992-2007.
663 G.Nathiya, M.Balasubramani, 2017/Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences. 11(6) Special 2017, Pages: 657-663
4. Kwong, J., Y.K. Ramadass, N. Verma, and A.P. Chandrakasan, 2009. “ A 65 nm sub-Vt microcontroller
with integrated SRAM and switched capacitor DC-DC converter,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 44(1): 115–
126.
5. Gong, C.S.A., M.T. Shiue, C.T. Hong and K.W. Yao, 2008. “Analysis and design of an efficient
irreversible energy recovery logic in 0.18-μm CMOS,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg. Papers, 55(9):
2595–2607.
6. Reddy, N.S.S., M. Satyam and K.L. Kishore, 2008. “Cascadable adiabatic logic circuits for low-power
applications,” IET Circuits, Devices Syst., 2(6): 518–526.
7. Sathe, V.S., J.Y. Chueh and M.C. Papaefthymiou, 2007. “Energy-efficient GHz-class charge-recovery
logic,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 42(1): 38–47.
8. Calhoun, B.H. and A.P. Chandrakasan, 2006. “Static noise margin variation for sub-threshold SRAM in 65-
nm CMOS,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 41(7): 1673–1679.
9. Soeleman, H., K. Roy and B.C. Paul, 2001. “Robust subthreshold logic for ultra-low power operation,”
IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst., 9(1): 90–99.
10. Maksimovic, D., V.G. Oklobdzija, B. Nikolic and K.W. Current, 2000. “Clocked CMOS adiabatic logic
with integrated single-phase power clock supply,” IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst., 8(4):
460–463.