NUN SCHEME OF SERVICE 250517last
NUN SCHEME OF SERVICE 250517last
SCHEME OF SERVICE
CRITERIA FOR APPOINTMENT, APPRAISAL AND
PROMOTION OF ACADEMIC STAFF
MAY, 2017.
1
CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Preamble 3
A. Constitution of appraisal/review Panel 3
B. External Assessment 4
C. Right of Appeal 5
D. Conditions for Promotion, Review and Upgrading 5
E. Criteria for Assessment 6
a) Qualification 6
b) Time-in-Rank 6
c) Accelerated Promotion 6
d) Teaching Load 6
e) Teaching quality 7
f) Teaching experience at University Level 7
g) Research 7
h) Publications 7
i) Professional Practice 8
j) Academic leadership 9
k) Administrative Responsibilities 9
l) Community/Public Service 9
F. Minimum Qualification for all academic staff positions 10
a) Faculty of Arts 10
b) Faculty Management Sciences 11
c) Faculty of Law 12
d) Faculty of Sciences 14
e) Faculty of Social Science 15
f) Faculty of Engineering 16
g) Faculty of Medicine 17
G. Scoring system 19
2
PREAMBLE
All appointment, appraisal and promotions exercise relating to academic staff shall be carried
in compliance with the criteria and procedures set out in this document. An annual appraisal
exercise shall be carried out for every member of staff based on the relevant criteria detailed
below. This will be for purposes of record-noting, rewards, discipline or termination of
appointment. Assessment shall take account of the totality of a candidate’s performance. For
any promotion from one level to another, however there must be quantifiable evidence of
significant additional contribution since appointment or previous promotion. This applies to
promotion up to senior lectureship as well as establishing a prima facie case for promotion to
Readership or professorship.
This document, containing the criteria and procedure approved by the University governing
Council for the Appointment and promotion of academic staff in the University shall take
effect from............
i. There shall be an annual appraisal and review of the work and conduct of
every member of the academic staff. This shall be undertaken by the
Appointment and Promotion Committee for Academic staff or on its behalf,
by the appraisal and Review Panels, constituted for the purpose.
ii. Staff appraisal and review shall have the effect of positive incentive such as
commendation for a specific contribution or achievement or rectification of
anomalies from previous appointments or appraisals. They may also result in
staff warnings, reprimand, and termination of appointment or dismissal.
iii. The Head of Department shall be responsible for the appraisals and reviews of
the academic staff in his/her department, and shall submit them in the
prescribed form to the Appraisal and Review Panel using form AP1.Where the
Head of Department is below the rank of a Professor, he/she shall only
appraise and review the academic staff below his/her rank.
iv. Assessment of Staff above the rank of current Head of Department shall be
done by the Provost or Dean for assessment.
v. At the end of the Head of department appraisal and review exercise he shall
submit the appraisal forms, having appended his comments, along with a
summary of the details of the academic staff in the prescribed format to the
Provost/Dean, director/University Librarian for his/her comments.
vii. DVC’s, Deans, and the University Librarian are to send their completed
appraisal forms directly to the Vice Chancellor. However, the Vice Chancellor
shall direct another competent person who is an expert and of higher rank in
the in the area of specialization of the applicant to advice him/her accordingly.
3
viii. Each Reviewer shall receive and consider in respect of each member of
academic staff the following:
ix. Having received the appraisal documents shall forward same to the
appointment and Promotion committee (Academic staff) of the University.
x. The appointment and Promotion committee for Academic staff shall consist of
the Vice-Chancellor (Chairman) or his nominee The Deputy Vice-
Chancellors, Deans of Faculties and Post Graduate School and Director of
Academic Planning, three members of the Governing Council and the
Registrar (Member and Secretary)
B. EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT
iii. Members of staff with a prima-facie case for promotion to the post of
Professor or reader shall submit sets of their publications to the secretary
within one month from the date of meeting of the appointment and promotion
committee, failing which the assessment shall be deemed to have lapsed.
iv. External assessors are to be given a maximum of two months within which to
complete their assessment. In the event of inability or failure to comply within
the stipulated time. Other assessors should be requested to undertake the
assessment of the candidate.
v. Where one assessor responds and others do not and therefore new assessors
have to be appointed, the candidate’s promotion, if and when it comes, shall be
made retroactive to the date when the promotion would originally have been
made. The decision of at least two (2) out of three (3) external assessors must
be positive for the candidate to be considered for promotion.
vi. The vice-chancellor shall make an annual progress report to Council on all
candidates currently undergoing external assessment.
C. RIGHT OF APPEAL
4
There is a Right of Appeal to Council through the Appointments and Promotion
Committee, but this must be made through the Head of Department concerned and the
Provost of the College/Dean of Faculty concerned. An advance copy of appeal may be
sent directly to the Vice-Chancellor by the candidate. Appeals will only be considered
by the appointments and Promotions committee and the council if both the candidate
and the Provost/Dean are able to produce fresh evidence, which as not available when
the original decision was taken.
ii. Requests for upgrading or review of salary, which are made in the first year of
appointment will not normally, be considered since no member can assume
duty without first accepting the offer of appointment and signing a contract
with the University. However, the appointments and Promotions Committee
shall consider upgrading or review matters, only after they are recommended
by the various University annual Appraising supervisor. In such
circumstances, the candidate, through the head of Department and the
Provost/Dean, shall produce fresh evidence, indicating that the earlier
interview or assessment was not based on all the available facts and that
resulted in his/her wrong placement. The appointment and Promotions
committee shall, at its own discretion, decide on whether or not the upgrading
should be backdated.
iii. For the avoidance of doubt, the University is not obliged to upgrade or
promote any member of staff simply because he/she has been upgraded or
promoted by another institution.
iv. A person promoted or upgraded shall be placed on salary scale higher than
his/her previous one, such that there is an increase in salary.
v. Promotion shall not normally take effect earlier than the first day of October
following the date on which the promotion is made.
vii. Where member staff gets two negative assessments out of the three he/she
submitted, he/she will be required to resubmit for fresh assessment through the
Faculty. In such a situation, the effective date of promotion should reflect the
new date of resubmission.
5
E. CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT
a) QUALIFICATIONS:
ii. Higher Degree: MA, M.Sc, M. Eng., M.Ed, MLS, LLM, M. Phil, PhD, D Phil,
MD, D.Sc, MV.Sc, MCVSN (with thesis) etc.
b) TIME IN RANK:
d) TEACHING LOAD:
Teaching load shall be in accordance with the staff rules and regulations.
e) TEACHING QUALITY
6
The assessment of teaching quality will be carried out annually for everybody.
Criteria to be considered include:
g) REASEARCH
i. The following shall be accepted as evidence of research:
a) Published paper(s) in reputable journals, but this will earn credit only
under publication.
b) Progress reports on long term research undertakings;
c) Seminar papers based on ongoing research;
d) Departmental/College/Faculty occasional papers, technical/research/
reports (copies of which are submitted to Senate Publications Committee)
h) PUBLICATIONS
7
viii. Accepted articles or books. These may be used for promotion to all grades
but only on strict verification by supervisors’ and an acceptance letter
valid for not more than two years from the date of issue.
b) Assessment of Research.
When publications are cited in support of promotion, the Head of Department
shall, without prejudice to the provisions of Section B (i), include in his
recommendation an assessment of those publications. However, the HOD may
require the opinion of another competent person who has read them. Apart from
publication details, reprints or certified photocopies of published papers must be
made available.
i) PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
ii. Other instances of professional practice may be seen in the following cases:
8
Sufficient information should be given to the assessors to enable them to
make a proper assessment of the background of the candidate and the
University’s needs.
j) ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP
k) ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES
These include holding such offices as Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Membership of
council, Provost/Dean, Deputy Provost/Deputy-Dean, Head of Department, Director/
Coordinator of a Division (e.g. Remedial Year Programme or General Studies). All
other administrative assignments, e.g. Membership of college/faculty or University
committees should be taken into account by the Head of Department in the annual
appraisal exercise.
9
i. Expert advice in candidate’s field of specialization to outside bodies, including
University Consultancy Service,
ii. Part-time service to statutory or ad-hoc Boards of Government or to other
Non-governmental organizations (NGO),
iii. Professional visibility, including discussion group, Guest Lectureship, articles
in the popular press, conferences etc, on subject)s) in the candidates area of
specialization,
iv. Leave of absence for national or other assignments
c) A member of staff who goes on leave of Absence for a long period may, on
return:
i. Be assessed on his or her individual merit, not as a contractual obligation,
unless otherwise previously agreed.
ii. Be assessed according to the existing criteria.
The Nile University of Nigeria adopting the minimum qualifications prescribed in the BMAS
in accordance with the respective Faculties.
a) FACULTY OF ARTS
The following qualifications are necessary for appointment and promotion from one to a
higher academic grade, in the Faculty of Arts, Nile University of Nigeria. The qualifications
are grouped accordingly in the table below:
10
least three years of teaching experience as a Lecturer
I. (Must have demonstrated research capability
through good academic publications.
f) Associate Professor Basic qualification set out for Lecturer II above, plus
(Reader) at least three years experience as Senior Lecturer.
Must have considerable publications resulting from
research as well as demonstrated academic leadership
ability.
To be promoted Associate Professor, external
assessment is required, plus evidence of participation
in University Administration, Teaching and
Supervision at higher level and Community activities.
The following qualifications are necessary for appointment and promotion from one to a
higher academic grade, in the Faculty of Management Sciences of Nile University of Nigeria.
The qualifications are grouped accordingly in the table below
11
research as well as demonstrated academic leadership
ability. A Reader should have evidence of
participation in University administration and
community activities. External assessment is required
for promotion to the level of an Associate Professor.
g Professor Basic qualifications as for Lecturer II. A Professor
should demonstrate a clear evidence of scholarship
through considerable academic publications. Must
have had at least three years experience as Associate
Professor as well as some professional’s recognition.
External assessment is required for promotion to the
level of a Professor.
c) FACULTY OF LAW
The following qualifications are necessary for appointment and promotion from one to a
higher academic grade, in the Faculty of Law of Nile University of Nigeria. The
qualifications are grouped accordingly in the table below.
- Must be intellectually and morally capable to teach and conduct research and provide
leadership to the students; adequate supply and well remunerated; and
- must have adequate opportunity for self retraining through research, attendance at
conferences and training programmes.
Today, lower grade academic staff of law faculties are normally recruited direct from outside
while those on higher grades get there mostly by promotion. This practice is hereby endorsed
and the following should also apply:
12
good academic publications
The following qualifications are necessary for appointment and promotion from one to a
higher academic grade, in the Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences of Nile University of
Nigeria. The qualifications are grouped accordingly in the table below:
13
Outstanding research and teaching coupled with
services to the University and the Community.
External Assessment is required.
g) Professor At least three (3) years of University teaching
experience as Associate Professor with considerable
publications, outstanding research, including
postgraduate supervision teaching and service to the
University and community. The position can be filled
either by promotion or appointment. External
Assessment is required.
The following qualifications are necessary for appointment and promotion from one to a
higher academic grade, in the Faculty of Social Sciences of Nile University of Nigeria. The
qualifications are grouped accordingly in the table below:
14
should demonstrate a clear evidence of scholarship
through considerable academic publications. Must
have had at least three years experience after
Associate Professorship or five years after Senior
Lectureship and must have had some university
administrative experience as well as some
professional recognition. In addition, external
assessors are mandatory. By direct appointment from
Senior Lecturer to Professor, there must be six years
experience in addition to the other requirements.
f) FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
The following qualifications are necessary for appointment and promotion from one to a
higher academic grade, in the Faculty of Engineering of Nile University of Nigeria. The
qualifications are grouped accordingly in the table below:
15
referred journal publications. Also, a Lecturer I plus a
minimum of three years or equivalent industrial
experience can be considered
The following qualifications are necessary for appointment and promotion from one to a
higher academic grade, in the College of Health Sciences, Nile University of Nigeria. The
qualifications are grouped accordingly in the table below:
16
e) Senior Lecturer For appointment to the position of Senior Lecturer,
the candidate should normally possess at least three
years teaching experience as Lecturer I in a
University or Institution of similar status and must
also show evidence of significant advancement in
scholarly achievements since his appointment as a
Lecturer I. Evidence of scholarly achievements shall
normally be in the form of research publications,
creative work and professional contributions will also
be considered. A rating above satisfactory on his/her
academic and administrative leadership of the
Department as well as demonstration of interest in
community service.
G. SCORING SYSTEM
i. Qualification
Candidates for appointment to academic posts shall be assessed on the basis of the
following qualifications:
Points Yours
Scored Score
(a) Bachelors Degree:
1st Class (Hons) 5
2nd Class (Hons) Upper Division 4
2nd Class (Hons) Lower Division 3
(d) M. Phil/MD 8
17
(e) Doctorate Degree/including MD British 10
3. Time in rank;
Points Scored Yours
Score
1 points per year (up to a
maximum of 3)
4. Teaching Quality
Maximum of 4 points
5. Professional Practice
Points Scored Yours
Score
Maximum of 3 points
6. Research Publication
18
a) Articles in refereed journal First three(3) 4 each
others 2 each
I) Bibliographies in 2 (shared)
1) Journal: Unannotated One or more 3 (shared)
Annotated 1 (shared)
2) Monographs: Unannotated 2 (Shared)
Annotated 2 (shared)
3) Books: Unannotated 3 (shared)
j) Artistic works 1 4
1) Short creative writing (i.e. drama
between 30 minutes and one hour, a
short story, a musical composition First three artist 5 each
between 15 and 30 minutes, a corpus
Others 2 each
of at least 10 poems) which must be
refereed and published.
2) Art exhibition of at least 15
documented new works.
3) An anthology of 20 poems, One (1) 5
(which must be refereed and
published
4) Full-length play (i.e. 11/2 hours
One (1) 5
and above) which must be
refereed and published
19
5) A musical composition of 11/2
hours and above, which must be
refereed and published One (1) 6
g) Clinical Duties
1 (up to a maximum of
3)
20
ii. Deputy Provost/Sub-Dean, Directorship, Headship of
Departments and coordinator at University/Faculty 3
level
Yours Total
Score
The unified system of ratings given in Table I shall be used for the appointments and
promotions to Professorship and equivalent posts by the respective Appointments.
21
1 Qualifications 15 15
3 Research
10 10
(b) Output Conference papers, Seminars
delivered within essential period
(c) Publications 24 24
4 Administrative Experiences 5 5
5 Community Service - 5
6 Interview Performance 25 -
Teaching Quality 4 4 4 4 4 - -
22
Professional 3 3 2 2 - - -
Practical/Activities
Research/Publication 60 40 20 12/8 4 - -
Academic
leadership/Administrative 4 3 2 - - - -
Responsibility
University
Community/Public Service 6 4 - - - - -
4) Lecturer I (31/28points)
A candidate with a Masters Degree must obtain a total minimum qualifying score of
31, out of which 7 must be from Qualification, 3 from Teaching Experience, 12 from
Research Publications and 4 from teaching quality. A candidate with PhD must obtain
a total minimum qualifying score of 28, out of which 10 must be from Qualification, 2
from Teaching Experience, 8 from research publications and 4 from Teaching
Quality.
23
Teaching Experience, 4 from Leadership/Administrative Responsibilities, 4 from
Teaching Quality and 6 from University Community/Public Service.
NOTE: These minimum score points are only guidelines to the minimum
requirements that a candidate must fulfil before being eligible for
promotion/appointment. In practice especially in the higher echelon, (Senior
Lectureship and above), these minimum requirements are expected to be substantially
exceeded. For the avoidance of doubt, candidates aspiring to Readership and
Professorship, which are the highest levels of achievement in an academic career,
must have distinguished themselves in research publication (with a good national and
international spread), academic leadership and teaching quality.
Prepared by Approved by
24