The_independence_of_the_ordering_pr
The_independence_of_the_ordering_pr
se el a) ly and snen(2 Uy we obi BP Sc Pm aOhy = a, Hy nd ae (agpotoss}, we get pel, Gade Proof of (b- We ae ging Wo show thatthe gtr ese saduaos othe pei is treated i () “Hemme Ue Gy a st pe De Fach that pe fur seme n> 0. Choose rel fork that the 1E-word ‘yp ate WER Toprsents tegen eylcally ved (et. (o)) and wtch tat the foiwing Toe (6) Bho e808 ye any 427 for ator yeaa Nt and ye SEU BE for ae ‘Worl how Ut under thew conditions 0 stisies the hypotasis ‘ot (gh Toon (0) el be proved: Wo eonelade «Mt aa hee, ecaae ot ell, peor We tay samune that B> 0, La. 9 My Otberwie we get cet ‘ecunte of My
r meh that — A, By Od) Bacante of Hy Sy (i) $8 sated with yespect to $y to, ‘and i aid with vespect to Sy becauso of Gy §. Hence wo are ia the fest, fee (above) where the sets 7, MP, AP ae in gy and that in 5. ‘That, (a, (Dy () are batik rmpet toes, Proot of (Of, oP eS bwcaate of te deision of Sy, and 4 84 beaause of Lomma 1 (a) and property (a) above. Thanh 4, There ents a permiaton group om a at D eveh that ‘he jllwing condo are sli (A) Kale) He) for ery ¢« ED) () (Exe), He} = Kxee) for all «, € HD). (6) There are uy ejweD, ye, diferent from each the, and ayred nih tht os oe and’ wore, (ote that aertion (0) of his lemma 12 weaker than the core: sponding stron of thoor (@)) ‘Proot, Let, be aa in Lemme 3. Lat D bo the set ofthe lett ‘ote af fahod §, Wo denote the cot ontainisg © by 7. To every ‘yeBcarmesponda the permutation 9" of D which mape 7 onto 52 We have « FEF it ehywes Sines the corespondence yy 6 & homomorphiim, we have fr soy werd Wien 68) (at, a at be the group ofthe Ps ye Mhen F satis (A), (B), (0): Proof of (A). We havo to show that Mle) Hite) fr any ¢«BWD) Now, te B(D) and. peMole, Wen pre eke) for s sultable w> 0 it Gi vel‘Bot surion (A) of Lemma nomsly §
0, Hen pa) ~ a inpion gla) =e
Hanes y exe, Wed
root of (BD) Given 6,4 « LD), we have to show Hat Kee)
Us Hold Let y «Ke ) and thovoe de tach that & =p,
‘Wwe dantia te et othe ent eorremponaing tothe lente fh abs
tee F of G by X. Now, poking out oe seprseutativg of each cows
ng to obe otto me © ‘nd, we get mtnally dint
Hite mbwts A,B, 0 of G week hat es 4U0 and ao BuO,
A,B, O,d eats te conditions (), (state in Lena 3, () expres
‘hat trent elonens of Av BC vopremt aitrnt coat: Bor the
prot of (i Int we 0. Then Bem ern and swe dye Kalen ¢
Bu) m2 (0) given ede eG By Lanai 3) and teanlation os)
‘hoe woe Ey mate such th 2 «Eye f ee) ad p= det gt
‘Hee, Hee p= nf aty ee) ee
oot of (0) Take eR according to Laxune 3 (0) Define
@, enh wad ones tf Then eT became,
i
8 and t= P cae of Ft) =(aF tbe b. Saco a D>
sab and pr: Tob wo gat et Norte ad rs our ak
stace 0, 45, i tlone that uy are diferent fons euch thor, aed
Proof of Theorem (G) lat F,D bo aé in Temma 4, Take &
eaamerble family (CED3}uy of Semorphie roca a, By, whe
‘the 2s are matuly ijl Then we define (0) to bo the weak
et 'yrodact of the GE-D)?x Le. OUD. andthe lerneate of @
‘ce thaw perotation oO wich act om every capone, og an
‘lement of bung tho Wdeuty element of For linet every te
Tooling it the constructions we ied, iin laa Tat ie
‘umerbla. The, i i eval seen tat the properties (A) (8) af