Assignment 3( QM)
Assignment 3( QM)
Deadline: Feb 5
Submit your work in class.
𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 = 𝛽𝛽0 + 𝛽𝛽1 ℎ𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 + 𝛽𝛽2 ℎ𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 + 𝛽𝛽3 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 + 𝛽𝛽4 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 + 𝛽𝛽5 ℎ𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 + 𝑢𝑢
The variable 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 is the combined SAT score, ℎ𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 is size of the student’s high school graduating
class, in hundreds, hsizesq is the square of hsize, 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 is a gender dummy variable equal to one
for females and zero otherwise, 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 is a race dummy variable equal to one for blacks and zero
otherwise, and hsrank is the student’s ranking in graduation class
(b)Is there strong evidence that ℎ𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 should be included in the model? From this estimated
regression model, what is the optimal class size?
(c) Holding ℎ𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 fixed, what is the estimated difference in SAT score between nonblack females
and nonblack males? How statistically significant is this estimated difference?
(d) Test the null hypothesis 𝐻𝐻0 : 𝛽𝛽1 = 𝛽𝛽2 = 0 against the alternative hypothesis 𝐻𝐻1 : 𝐻𝐻0 is wrong at
the 5% significance level. The estimated restricted regression model is as follows. What is your
conclusion?
For 1990, let dkr be a firm’s debt to capital ratio, let eps denote the earning per share, let
netinc denote net income, and let salary denote total compensation for CEO.
(b) Test whether the explanatory variables are jointly significant at the 5% level. Is any explanatory
variable individually significant?
(c) Now, reestimate the model using the log form for netinc and salary:
𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 = 𝛽𝛽0 + 𝛽𝛽1 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 + 𝛽𝛽2 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 + 𝛽𝛽3 log (𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛) + 𝛽𝛽4 log (𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠) + 𝑢𝑢.
Do any conclusions from part (a) change?
(d) Should we try to use log(dkr) and log (eps) in the model to see if these improve the fit?
(e) Test the null hypothesis 𝛽𝛽1 = 1.5𝛽𝛽2 against 𝐻𝐻1 : 𝐻𝐻0 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤.
(f) Test the null hypothesis 𝛽𝛽2 = 𝛽𝛽3 = 𝛽𝛽4 = 0 against 𝐻𝐻1 : 𝐻𝐻0 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 .
3. The following model can be used to study whether campaign expenditure affect election
outcomes:
𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉 = 𝛽𝛽0 + 𝛽𝛽1 ln(𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒) + 𝛽𝛽2 ln(𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒) + 𝛽𝛽3 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 + 𝑢𝑢
where 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉 is the percentage of the vote received by Candidate A, 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 and 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 are
campaign expenditure by Candidates A and B, and 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 is a measure of party strength for
Candidate A (the percentage of the most recent presidential vote that went to A’s party).
(b) Is homoskadasticity assumption met? (Use the 4-step procedure that we discussed in class.)
(c) Use the LM statistic to test for heteroskedasticity and report the p-value.
(d) Do we omit nonlinear (X) terms in the original model? Use the Ramsey RESET to detect
nonlinearities. [Hint: to calculate predicted y, use the command > predict yhat]
4. Consider a simple regression 𝑦𝑦𝑖𝑖 = 𝛽𝛽0 + 𝛽𝛽1 𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖 + 𝑢𝑢𝑖𝑖 , 𝑖𝑖 = 1,2, . . 𝑛𝑛, where 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶(𝑥𝑥, 𝑢𝑢) ≠ 0.
(a) State the conditions needed for a good instrumental variable 𝑧𝑧.