0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views3 pages

Ex IV-screening

The document presents a hypothetical study on diabetes screening using fasting blood sugar (FBS) and glucose tolerance test (GTT) among 1000 patients. It outlines calculations for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for different cut-off points of FBS. The document also discusses the implications of changing the cut-off point on these values and poses questions regarding the selection of an optimal cut-off for community surveys.

Uploaded by

Obsa Abrahim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views3 pages

Ex IV-screening

The document presents a hypothetical study on diabetes screening using fasting blood sugar (FBS) and glucose tolerance test (GTT) among 1000 patients. It outlines calculations for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for different cut-off points of FBS. The document also discusses the implications of changing the cut-off point on these values and poses questions regarding the selection of an optimal cut-off for community surveys.

Uploaded by

Obsa Abrahim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Screening of diabetes

In a hypothetical study, 1000 patients attending a hospital general outpatient department


were tested for diabetes using the following two tests: fasting blood sugar (FBS) and
glucose tolerance test (GTT).There were 100 patients who had a positive GTT, and they
were classified as true cases of diabetes. There were also 140 patients with FBS at least
6 mmol/l (cut –off point to distinguish people with diabetes from those who do not have
diabetes). Among these 140 patients, only 98 were true cases of diabetes (i.e. only 98
had a positive GTT as well)

Question 1. What are the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive
values of the FBS in this study population?

Disease status
Positive Negative Total
Screening Positive
Test Negative
Total

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

Question 2. Calculate the positive predictive value and negative predictive value of
FBS in this surrey?

Disease status
Positive Negative Total
Screening Positive
Test Negative
Total

PPV NPV
1
Page
The FBS test and GTT were used in a hypothetical community survey to screen for
diabetes. Among 1000 people surveyed, 40 people had appositive GTT for diabetes
and were classified as true cases of diabetes. An FBS cut – off value of 6 mmol/l was
used to distinguish between people with and without diabetes and assume that at this
cut off point the FBS had sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 95% in diagnosing
diabetes.

Question 3. What are the positive predictive value and negative predictive value of
FBS in this survey?

Disease status
Positive Negative Total
Screening Positive
Test Negative
Total

PPV NPV
Question 4. Why is the positive predictive value different from that observed in
hypothetical hospital-based study?

Assume that if the cut off point of FBS is increased to 7.5 mmol/L the sensitivity
is 90%, and the specificity is 99% for the diagnosing diabetes.

Question 5
What are the positive predictive value and false negative error rate of FBS if the cut-
off point of 7.5 mmol/L is used to screen for diabetes in this community?

Disease status
Positive Negative Total
Screening Positive
Test Negative
Total

PPV NPV

Question 6. If you were asked to fix the cut off point of FBS, for a survey in your
community, what would you select 6 mmol/L or 7 mmol/L? Give your reason! 3
Page

You might also like