0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views79 pages

FMT p1.0

The document outlines various aspects of forensic medicine, medical jurisprudence, ethics, and the structure and functions of the Medical Council of India (MCI) and State Medical Councils (SMCs). It details the duties and responsibilities of doctors, including maintaining medical records, ensuring patient confidentiality, and adhering to ethical standards. Additionally, it discusses medical malpractice, professional misconduct, and the legal obligations of medical practitioners in relation to patient care and public safety.

Uploaded by

sohan289yadav
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views79 pages

FMT p1.0

The document outlines various aspects of forensic medicine, medical jurisprudence, ethics, and the structure and functions of the Medical Council of India (MCI) and State Medical Councils (SMCs). It details the duties and responsibilities of doctors, including maintaining medical records, ensuring patient confidentiality, and adhering to ethical standards. Additionally, it discusses medical malpractice, professional misconduct, and the legal obligations of medical practitioners in relation to patient care and public safety.

Uploaded by

sohan289yadav
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 79

1.

Forensic Medicine (Legal Medicine or State Medicine)

●​ Definition: Application of medical science principles and knowledge to legal


purposes and proceedings to aid in justice administration.

2. Medical Jurisprudence

●​ Definition: Application of law knowledge in relation to the practice of medicine.


●​ Includes:
○​ Doctor-Patient Relationship
○​ Doctor-Doctor Relationship
○​ Doctor-State Relationship

3. Medical Etiquette

●​ Definition: Conventional laws and customs of courtesy followed between


members of the same profession.
●​ Principle: A doctor should treat colleagues with respect, e.g., by not charging
them or their families for professional services.

4. Medical Ethics

●​ Definition: Concerned with moral principles guiding medical professionals in their


interactions with each other, patients, and the State.
●​ Nature: A self-imposed code of conduct voluntarily adopted by medical
professionals.

5. Forensic Science

●​ Definition: A group of scientific disciplines focused on applying specific scientific


expertise to legal, criminal, and judicial matters.
●​ Scope: Examination of objects, substances (e.g., blood/drug samples), chemicals
(e.g., paints/explosives/toxins), tissue traces (e.g., hair/skin), and impressions
(e.g., fingerprints/tire marks) at crime scenes.
Medical Council of India (MCI).

Definition: A statutory body responsible for establishing and maintaining uniform


standards of medical education and recognition of medical qualifications.

Key Acts

●​ Indian Medical Degrees Act, 1916: Regulates titles indicating qualification in


Western Medical Science.
●​ IMC Act, 1956: Established the Medical Council of India; repealed the 1933 Act.
Modified in 1964, 1993, 2001.
●​ 2010 Ordinance: Central Government replaced MCI with a Board of Governors
(BoG), renewed until 2013 due to delays in passing the IMC (Amendment) Bill.

IMC Structure

●​ Members:

●​ Leadership: President and Vice-President elected from these members.

Schedules

●​ First Schedule: Recognized Indian medical qualifications.


○​ Any medical institution which grants a qualification not included in the First
Schedule may apply to the Central Government and after consulting the
Council may amend the First Schedule, and the same is entered in the last
column of the First Schedule.
○​ Amendments: Central Government can amend this schedule after Council
consultation.
●​ Second Schedule: Recognized foreign medical qualifications.
○​ Reciprocity: The Council negotiates with foreign authorities for mutual
recognition.
●​ Third Schedule:
○​ Part I: Includes qualifications like Licensed Medical Practitioner (LMP).
○​ Part II: Recognized foreign qualifications not in the 2nd Schedule.

Functions of MCI

1.​ Indian Medical Register:


○​ Contains names, addresses, qualifications of registered medical
practitioners.
2.​ Standards in Medical Education:
○​ Maintains undergraduate/postgraduate standards.
○​ Inspectors verify institutions meet MCI criteria for staff, facilities, and
quality.
3.​ New Medical Colleges & Courses:
○​ Council approval needed before Central Government permits new
colleges/courses.
4.​ Recognition of Medical Qualifications granted by university of India
○​ Indian and foreign qualifications are recognized through consultation with
the Council.
5.​ De-Recognition of Qualifications:
○​ MCI may recommend withdrawal of recognition if standards are not met.
6.​ Reciprocal Recognition of Foreign Qualifications:
○​ MCI can negotiate with foreign authorities for reciprocal qualification
recognition.
7.​ Appellate Powers:
○​ Advises Central Health Ministry on appeals regarding disciplinary actions.
8.​ Disciplinary Control:
○​ Sets conduct standards, issues warnings on professional misconduct.
9.​ Certificates:
○​ Issues certificates of good conduct for doctors going abroad.
10.​CME Programs:
○​ Sponsors Continuing Medical Education programs for practitioners.
11.​Faculty Development:
○​ Conducts training for medical college faculty.

Re-Registration

●​ MCI recommends 5-year re-registration for doctors with State Medical Councils
(SMCs).
●​ Some states (e.g., Punjab, Delhi) already have re-registration provisions.
State Medical Council (SMC)

Composition of State Medical Council (SMC)

●​ Leadership: A President and Vice-President are elected from within the members.

Functions of State Medical Council (SMC)

1.​ Maintenance of Medical Register


○​ Maintains a list of medical practitioners in its jurisdiction.
○​ Upon payment of fees, enters the practitioner’s name, address, and
qualifications.
○​ Grants provisional registration to students who passed exams but require
internship; grants permanent registration after internship.
2.​ Renewal of Registration
○​ Practitioners must complete at least 30 hours of CME every 5 years to renew
registration.
○​ Some states plan to legislate mandatory re-registration for doctors.
3.​ Disciplinary Control
○​ Can issue warnings, suspend, or erase practitioners’ names from the register
for unethical practices.
○​ Disciplinary action applies if:
■​ Convicted by court for a criminal offense.
■​ A complaint of misconduct is filed..
○​ Decisions on misconduct are made within 6 months.
4.​ Removal and Restoration of Names
○​ Can remove names from the register if unable to contact a practitioner.
○​ Has authority to restore removed names.

Duties of a Doctor (as per Indian Medical Council Act, 1956)

●​ Code of Medical Ethics: Doctors acknowledge disciplinary actions for unethical


conduct and agree to abide by the regulations.
○​ Hippocratic Oath: Ethical guidelines for doctors.
○​ Declaration of Geneva: Modern adaptation of the Hippocratic Oath.
○​ Declarations by the World Medical Association (WMA): Guidelines on
various ethical matters, including human rights, torture, patient rights, child
health, and other topics.

General Duties of a Doctor


1.​ Character and Medical Practice
○​ Uphold profession’s dignity, prioritize service over financial gain.
○​ Continual Learning: Engage in CMEs and medical associations.
2.​ Medical Record Maintenance
○​ Keep records of in-patients for 3 years.
○​ Provide records within 72 hours upon patient or legal request.
3.​ Display of Registration Numbers
○​ Display registration number in clinic, on prescriptions, certificates, etc.
4.​ Use of Generic Drug Names
○​ Prescribe drugs using generic names for rational use.
5.​ Patient Care Quality Assurance
○​ Avoid using unqualified assistants in professional duties.
6.​ Exposure of Unethical Conduct
○​ Report incompetent or dishonest conduct within the profession.
7.​ Fee Transparency
○​ Display and announce fees before services.
8.​ Compliance with Legal Restrictions
○​ Follow country laws and avoid helping others to evade them.

Duties of a Doctor to the State

1.​ Poisoning Cases: Assist law enforcement in determining poisoning causes.


2.​ Notification: Report communicable diseases, births, deaths, and epidemics to public
health authorities.

Duties of a Doctor Towards Patients

1.​ Skill and Knowledge


○​ Maintain reasonable skills; duty begins upon doctor-patient relationship
establishment.
2.​ Continuous Attendance
○​ Obligated to attend until no longer necessary or if patient requests withdrawal.
3.​ Proper Medicine Prescription
○​ Legible prescriptions and capital letters to avoid errors.
4.​ Detailed Instructions
○​ Clear guidance on medication usage, injection administration, and diet.
5.​ Honest Prognosis: Communicate patient’s condition openly.
6.​ Warnings
○​ Warn of side effects to avoid liability.
7.​ Infectious Disease Precautions: Notify third parties in contact with infectious
patients.
8.​ Special Care for Minors/Disabled: Arrange for their proper care.
9.​ Consent for Treatment/Operations: Informed consent required.
10.​Surgical Precautions: Ensure accuracy, obtain patient consent, and avoid
delegation without oversight.
11.​Emergency Services: Ethically obligated to assist in emergencies.

Confidentiality (Medical Secrecy)

1.​ Professional Confidentiality


○​ Maintain confidentiality except where legally required or with patient consent.
2.​ Patient Consent Required: Disclose patient information only with patient consent or
in notifiable disease cases.
3.​ Exceptions: Confidentiality applies even with police custody cases or patient
requests.

Duties in Doctor Consultation

1.​ Patient Benefit Priority: Avoid unnecessary consultations.


2.​ Post-Consultation Statements: Patient statements should be in consultant’s
presence.
3.​ Specialist Referrals: Written opinions and case summaries required.

Privileged Communication

●​ Definition: A bona fide statement made by a doctor to an authority with a


corresponding interest, protecting community or state interests.
●​ It is an exchange of information between two individuals in a confidential
relationship, and an exception to professional secrecy.
●​ Criteria for Privilege:
○​ Must be made to a person with a direct interest.
○​ If made to multiple individuals or those without a direct interest, privilege
fails.
●​ Patient Consent: Doctors should persuade patients to consent before notifying
authorities, but disclosure can occur without consent if necessary.

Examples of Privileged Communication

1.​ Civic Benefit:


○​ Disclosure required if there's a threat to public safety or health (e.g.,
contagious diseases in public roles).
2.​ Notifiable Clauses:
○​ Doctors must notify authorities of births, deaths, infectious diseases, etc.
3.​ Suspected Crime:
○​ Report crimes discovered during treatment (e.g., assaults, abuse).
○​ Mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse under the Protection of
Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
4.​ Patient’s Interest:
○​ Disclose conditions to relatives for proper treatment (e.g., suicidal
tendencies).
5.​ Self-Interest:
○​ Evidence may be disclosed in civil/criminal suits involving the patient.
6.​ Negligence Suits:
○​ Information acquired during examinations for negligence suits is not
confidential.
7.​ Court-Ordered Examination:
○​ Reports from court-ordered exams are not confidential.
8.​ Court of Law:
○​ Doctors must disclose facts about illness in court to avoid contempt
penalties.

Key Points on Privilege

●​ Privilege protects communications in specific relationships from compelled


disclosure.
●​ Privilege statutes define circumstances for releasing information without consent.

Privileged Communication

Definition:

●​ A statement made bona fide by a doctor to a concerned authority having a legal,


social, or moral duty to protect the interests of the community or the state.
●​ It is an exchange of information between two individuals in a confidential relationship
and serves as an exception to professional secrecy.

Key Features of Privileged Communication:

1.​ Duty to Disclose:


○​ Must be made to a person with a duty towards the matter.
○​ Disclosure to more than one person or an irrelevant party invalidates the
privilege.
2.​ Consent of the Patient:
○​ Doctors should persuade the patient to give consent before notifying
authorities.
○​ Disclosure without consent is permissible if the patient refuses, especially in
cases of public interest.

Examples of Privileged Communication:

i. Civic Benefit:

●​ When to Disclose: Potential threat of ‘grave harm’ to the safety or health of the
patient and the public.
●​ Examples:
○​ A bus driver, pilot, or ship navigator suffering from epilepsy, hypertension,
alcoholism, drug addiction, poor visual acuity, or color blindness.
○​ A teacher with tuberculosis or a cook with infectious diseases (e.g., enteric
infection).
●​ Procedure:
○​ Explain risks to the patient.
○​ Persuade the patient to allow the doctor to report the issue.
○​ If the patient refuses, consult senior colleagues before disclosing.
●​ Other Situations:
○​ A syphilitic using a public pool.
○​ A patient with an STD planning to marry (privileged communication).
○​ An impotent person getting married (not privileged communication).

ii. Notifiable Clauses:

●​ Statutory Duty to Notify:


○​ Births, deaths, stillbirths, infectious diseases, therapeutic abortions, drug
addictions, epidemics, and food poisoning to public health authorities.

iii. Suspected Crime:

●​ Mandatory Reporting:
○​ Crimes such as assault, terrorism, traffic offenses, or homicidal poisoning.
○​ Report to the nearest Magistrate or police officer.
●​ Confidentiality vs. Public Safety:
○​ Example 1: Underage girl with an STD – doctor may need to inform sexual
contacts even if the patient is reluctant.
○​ Example 2: Suspected child or elderly abuse – doctor’s priority is the
individual’s safety over confidentiality.
●​ Legal Obligation:
○​ Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (2012): Mandatory to
report child sexual abuse (≤18 years).
○​ Section 202 IPC: Failure to report knowledge of a crime can result in
imprisonment (up to 6 months) and/or a fine.

iv. Patient’s Own Interest:

●​ Disclosure to relatives if it aids in proper treatment, e.g., warning parents about a


patient’s suicidal tendencies.

v. Self-Interest of the Doctor:

●​ In civil or criminal cases where the patient sues the doctor, the doctor may disclose
patient information as part of their defense.

vi. Negligence Suits:

●​ When a doctor is hired by the opposing party to examine a patient in a negligence


suit, the acquired information is not confidential as no physician-patient relationship
exists.

vii. Court-Ordered Examination:

●​ If a court orders an examination, the doctor must inform the person that the findings
are not confidential.
●​ The report becomes part of the official court record.

viii. Court of Law:

●​ Doctors cannot refuse to disclose confidential patient information in court.


●​ Failure to answer can lead to penalties for contempt of court.

Medical Malpractice

●​ Definition: Covers failures in doctors' conduct affecting their skills and


relationships.
●​ Types:
1.​ Professional Misconduct: Behavior below expected standards.
2.​ Medical Negligence: Inadequate standard of medical care.

Unethical Acts

1.​ Advertising:
○​ Prohibited from soliciting patients or using their name for advertising.
○​ Allowed to announce practice changes, address changes, and public
charges in a specific format.
2.​ Patents and Copyrights:
○​ Patents are allowed but must benefit the larger population.
3.​ Drug Dispensing:
○​ Prohibited from dispensing drugs prescribed by others.
4.​ Rebates and Commissions:
○​ No gifts or commissions for referrals or diagnostic materials.
5.​ Secret Remedies:
○​ Must not prescribe unknown compositions.
6.​ Human Rights:
○​ Must not participate in torture or inflict trauma.
7.​ Euthanasia:
○​ Should not practice euthanasia.
8.​ Pharmaceutical Industry:
○​ No gifts or hospitality from pharmaceutical companies for attending events.

Professional Misconduct (Infamous Conduct)


Definition: Any conduct of the doctor which might reasonably be regarded as disgraceful or
dishonorable as judged by professional men of good repute and competence.

●​ It involves abuse of professional position.


Acts Constituting Professional Misconduct:

1. Ethical and Record-Keeping Violations:

●​ Engaging in any unethical practices.


●​ Failing to maintain medical records of indoor patients for 3 years.
●​ Refusing to provide medical records within 72 hours upon patient’s request.
●​ Not displaying the registration number (SMC) in the clinic, on prescriptions, and
certificates.

2. Absenteeism:

●​ Being absent more than twice during inspections:


○​ For doctors posted in rural areas (inspected by District Health
Authority/Chairman, Zila Parishad).
○​ For doctors in medical colleges (certified by Principal/Medical
Superintendent).

3. Falsification and Misleading Information:

●​ Providing false/misleading information to the MCI via Form A (submitted when


joining a medical college).

4. Personal Misconduct:

●​ Committing adultery or misbehaving with a patient.


●​ Being drunk or disorderly during professional duties.
●​ Being convicted by a court for offences involving moral turpitude or criminal acts.

5. Illegal Medical Practices:

●​ Conducting sex determination tests with the intent to terminate a female fetus.
●​ Performing illegal abortions/operations without valid medical, surgical, or
psychological indications.
●​ Issuing false or misleading certificates for legal or administrative use.
●​ Disclosing professional secrets without patient consent.

6. Drug and Prescription Violations:

●​ Violating provisions of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act:


○​ Selling Schedule ‘H’ and ‘L’ drugs to the public (except to patients).
○​ Prescribing steroids/psychotropic drugs without valid medical indications.
●​ Supplying addiction-forming drugs without medical necessity.

7. Unqualified Practice and Assistance:

●​ Giving cover or assisting an unqualified person to practice medicine or perform


procedures.
●​ Issuing certificates of efficiency in modern medicine to unqualified/non-medical
persons.
8. Refusal of Medical Services:

●​ Refusing to perform sterilization, birth control, circumcision, or MTP on religious


grounds when medically indicated.

9. Violation of Patient Privacy:

●​ Publishing photographs or case reports of patients without consent, especially if


the identity can be revealed.

10. Misrepresentation and False Claims:

●​ Claiming to be a specialist without having the required qualifications.


●​ Using touts or agents to entice patients.

11. Reproductive Procedures without Consent:

●​ Undertaking IVF or artificial insemination without the informed consent of the


female patient, her spouse, and the donor.

12. Research and Clinical Trials:

●​ Conducting clinical drug trials or research without following ICMR guidelines.

13. Advertising (Unethical Promotion):

●​ Prohibited Advertising Practices:


○​ Contributing to lay press articles or giving interviews that indirectly
promote the doctor.
○​ Using unusually large signboards with details beyond name, qualifications,
specialty, and registration number.
○​ Placing signboards in chemist shops or locations where the doctor doesn’t
reside or work.
○​ Listing name/specialty in bold letters in telephone directories like yellow
pages.
●​ Allowed Practices:
○​ Writing articles or giving talks on public health and hygiene.
○​ Participating in radio/TV/internet programs for educational purposes.

Important Offences (6 A’s):

1.​ Association with unqualified persons.


2.​ Advertising unethically.
3.​ Abortion (illegal or criminal).
4.​ Adultery or sexual misconduct.
5.​ Addiction (substance abuse issues).
6.​ Alcohol abuse affecting medical practice.
Types of Physician-Patient Relationship

There are two main types of relationships:

1.​ Therapeutic Relationship:


○​ Doctors can accept or refuse to treat a patient, except in emergencies.
○​ Reasons for refusal may include:
■​ Outside working hours.
■​ Not within specialty.
■​ Doctor or a family member is ill.
■​ Social obligations of the doctor.
■​ Illness is beyond the doctor’s competence or available facilities.
■​ Doctor is under the influence of alcohol.
■​ Patient is malingering.
■​ Defaulting on payment.
■​ Abusive or uncooperative behavior from patient or relatives.
■​ Patient refuses consent.
■​ Patient demanding specific drugs (e.g., amphetamines, steroids).
■​ Patient prefers high-cost remedies over low-cost alternatives.
■​ Nighttime security concerns if patient is unaccompanied.
■​ Unaccompanied minors or female patients.
■​ Doctor engaged with more serious cases.
■​ New patients if not the only doctor available.
2.​ Formal Relationship:
○​ Occurs when a third party refers a patient for an impartial medical
examination (e.g.,
■​ Pre-employment checks.
■​ Insurance evaluations.
■​ Annual medical checkups.
■​ Victims of crimes or rape cases.
■​ Medico-legal cases.
■​ Psychiatric assessments referred by court or police.
○​ Doctor must comply with directives from the referring party.

Professional Negligence

●​ Definition: The failure to exercise reasonable care and skill of an ordinary prudent
medical practitioner in the circumstances; a breach of duty to act with care
appropriate to the situation, which resulted in bodily injury (harm/loss) or death of the
patient.
●​ It involves a breach of duty that results in bodily injury, harm, or death of a
patient.
●​ It includes:
○​ Act of Omission: Failing to do something a reasonable person would do.
○​ Act of Commission: Doing something a reasonable person would not do.

Key Elements of Medical Negligence (4 Ds): (As per Black’s Law


Dictionary)

1.​ Duty of Care:


○​ Existence of a physician-patient relationship establishes the doctor’s duty
of care.
2.​ Dereliction (Breach of Duty):
○​ Violation of the standard of care due to negligent acts or omissions.
3.​ Damage:
○​ Compensable injury such as pain, disability, disfigurement, medical
expenses, lost wages, or death.
4.​ Direct Causation:
○​ A direct link between the breach of duty and the injury suffered by the
patient.

Malpractice Lawsuit:

●​ In negligence lawsuits:
○​ The patient = Plaintiff
○​ The doctor = Defendant
●​ The plaintiff must prove that damage was caused by the doctor’s conduct.

Difference Between Damage and Damages:

●​ Damage: Refers to the actual injury or harm (physical, mental, or financial).


●​ Damages: The financial compensation awarded by the court for the harm caused.

Categories of Damages:

1.​ Economic Damages:


○​ Monetary costs (e.g., medical bills, loss of income).
2.​ Non-Economic Damages:
○​ Pain and suffering, emotional distress, or loss of life’s pleasures (e.g.,
inability to have sex).
3.​ Punitive Damages:
○​ Awarded to punish the defendant for willful misconduct or gross
negligence.
Types of Professional Negligence:

1.​ Civil Negligence


2.​ Criminal Negligence

Civil Negligence:

●​ When Does It Arise?​


a. A patient (or relative in case of death) sues for compensation due to injury from
negligence.​
b. A doctor sues for unpaid fees, and the patient alleges professional negligence.
●​ Key Points:
○​ Involves acts that cause harm, suffering, or damage to the patient.
○​ The damage is compensable through money.
○​ Not governed by CrPC (Code of Criminal Procedure) or IPC (Indian Penal
Code).
○​ No legal punishment, only compensation.

Criminal Negligence:

●​ More Serious than civil negligence.


●​ Common in Cases Involving Death of the patient.
●​ Often related to:
○​ Drunkenness or drug impairment.
○​ Gross incompetence or indifference to patient safety.
●​ Legal Provision:
○​ Section 304-A IPC:
■​ Deals with criminal negligence.
■​ Punishment: Imprisonment up to 2 years and/or fine for causing
death by rash or negligent acts not amounting to culpable homicide.
●​ Key Differences from Civil Negligence:
○​ Higher degree of negligence required (gross negligence).
○​ What is negligence in civil law may not qualify as criminal negligence.
○​ The act must be something no reasonable doctor would do under similar
circumstances.

Examples of Medical Negligence:

●​ Performing unauthorized surgery without consent.


●​ Leaving instruments inside a patient post-surgery.
●​ Administering the wrong medication or dosage.
●​ Failure to diagnose a serious condition in time.

(A doctor can face both civil and criminal charges for the same negligent act.)

Legal Sections Involved:

●​ Section 304 IPC:


○​ Non-bailable offence, applies if the act was intentional.
●​ Section 304-A IPC:
○​ Bailable offence, applies if the act was unintentional but negligent.

Burden of Proof:

●​ Presumption of Innocence:
1.​ The doctor is innocent until proven guilty.
●​ Responsibility of Proof:
1.​ The plaintiff (patient) must prove the negligence.
●​ Standard of Proof:
1.​ Civil Cases:
■​ Based on a preponderance of evidence (at least 51% certainty).
■​ The judge must believe the plaintiff’s version is more plausible.
2.​ Criminal Cases:
■​ Requires proof beyond reasonable doubt (about 98-99% certainty).

Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur

●​ Meaning:
○​ A Latin term meaning "the thing speaks for itself."
○​ Applied in cases where the error or negligence is so obvious that it
doesn’t require expert testimony to prove it.
○​ In such cases, the burden of proof shifts to the doctor to prove their
innocence.

Key Features:

●​ Applicable to Both:
○​ Civil negligence and criminal negligence cases.
●​ No Need for Expert Evidence:
○​ The patient’s lawyer doesn’t need to produce medical expert testimony to
prove negligence.
●​ Burden of Proof:
○​ Shifts to the doctor, who must prove that there was no negligence on their
part.

Conditions for Applying Res Ipsa Loquitur:

1.​ Injury Would Not Have Occurred Without Negligence:


○​ The nature of the injury suggests that it couldn’t have happened without
someone’s negligence.
2.​ Exclusive Control of the Doctor:
○​ The doctor had complete control over the instrument/treatment that
caused the injury.
3.​ No Contributory Negligence by the Patient:
○​ The injury was not caused by the patient’s own actions or neglect.

Examples Where Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies:

1.​ Blood Transfusion Errors:


○​ Infected blood transfusion or blood group mismatch.
2.​ Failure to Administer Tetanus Toxoid:
○​ In cases of injury where the vaccine is medically necessary.
3.​ Medication Overdose:
○​ Prescribing an overdose leading to adverse effects.
4.​ Wrong-Site Surgery:
○​ Operating on the wrong person, wrong organ/limb, or wrong vertebral
level.
5.​ Leaving Surgical Instruments Inside the Body:
○​ E.g., scissors, sponges, or swabs left inside the abdomen after surgery.
6.​ Failure to Remove Swabs Post-Operation:
○​ Causing complications or even death.
7.​ Prolonged Splinting:
○​ Resulting in loss of use of a limb due to negligence in care.

Special Case: Gossypiboma (Also Known as Textiloma):

●​ Definition:
○​ Refers to foreign materials, like cotton sponges or swabs, accidentally
left inside a patient’s body after surgery.
●​ Common Materials Left Behind:
○​ Sponges (most common), swabs, towels, needles, instruments, catheters,
metal clips, contraceptive coils, retractors.
●​ Common Sites:
○​ Operating rooms, labor and delivery rooms, ambulatory surgery
centers, and labs where invasive procedures are performed (e.g.,
catheterizations, colonoscopies).

Defense Strategy in Res Ipsa Loquitur Cases:

●​ The defense generally tries to prove that the breach of duty:


○​ Did not cause any harm to the patient, or
○​ The injury was due to other factors unrelated to the alleged negligence

Preventing Medical Litigation

1. Awareness of Potential Areas of Litigation and Medico-Legal Problems

●​ Doctors should be aware of risks involved in medical procedures.


●​ Stay updated with changes in legislation affecting medical practice.

2. Good Doctor-Patient Relationship

●​ Empathy, good rapport, and addressing patient concerns help build trust.
●​ A suspicious or dissatisfied patient is more likely to file a lawsuit.

3. Appropriate Training and Maintenance of Authorized Protocols

●​ Ensure up-to-date training for medical and nursing staff.


●​ Avoid performing procedures beyond one’s capabilities and qualifications.
●​ Follow standard protocols and seek second opinions when necessary.

4. Maintaining Standard Medical Services

●​ Limit workload and ensure adequate infrastructure for quality care.


●​ Both public and private hospitals must meet minimum standards.

5. Proper Counseling and Informed Consent

●​ Mandatory informed consent before any medical, investigative, or surgical


procedure.
●​ Explain risks, benefits, and alternatives clearly to the patient.

6. Proper Investigation
●​ Conduct necessary non-invasive or invasive investigations after informing the
patient.
●​ Always obtain written consent before performing procedures.

7. Adequate Supervision and Timely Referral

●​ Implement a graded supervision system to monitor patient care.


●​ Ensure early detection of complications and timely referrals, especially in
emergencies.

8. Surgical Interventions

●​ Perform surgeries in well-equipped facilities with qualified staff.


●​ Ensure proper training and supervision of junior doctors.

9. Meticulous Record Keeping

●​ Maintain accurate, detailed medical records to defend against legal claims.


●​ Avoid fabricating or altering records after an incident, as this can worsen legal
consequences.

10. Morbidity and Mortality Audits

●​ Conduct regular audits to analyze errors and improve patient care standards.
●​ Encourage constructive criticism and continuous learning from past mistakes.

11. Medical Indemnity Insurance

●​ Doctors should have indemnity insurance to protect against financial liability from
malpractice claims.

12. Medical Defense Procedure

●​ Hire an efficient defense lawyer familiar with medical negligence cases.


●​ Ensure the lawyer understands medical standards of care to build a strong
defense.

Defenses Against Negligence

1. No Duty Owed to the Patient

●​ Argue that no doctor-patient relationship existed, hence no duty of care was


owed.
2. Duty Discharged According to Prevailing Standards

●​ Demonstrate that the medical care provided was in line with accepted medical
practices.

3. Informed Consent for the Act

●​ Prove that the patient was fully informed about the procedure’s risks and provided
consent.

4. Contributory Negligence by the Patient

●​ Show that the patient’s own actions contributed to the adverse outcome.

5. Therapeutic Misadventure

●​ Unforeseen complications despite proper care do not amount to negligence.

6. Medical Maloccurrence

●​ Some adverse outcomes are natural risks of treatment and not due to negligence.

7. Error of Judgment

●​ A mistake in clinical judgment isn’t considered negligence if made in good faith.


●​ Doctors are not liable if complications arise despite reasonable care.

8. Mistake of Fact

●​ Occurs when an act was done based on a misunderstanding of facts, without


malicious intent.
●​ May reduce civil liability, but doesn’t absolve criminal liability.

9. Res Judicata (The Matter Has Been Decided)

●​ If a case has been decided by a court, it cannot be reopened for the same issue
between the same parties.

10. Limitation Period

●​ A case must be filed within 2 years from the date of the alleged negligence.
●​ Cases filed after this period are usually not entertained.
Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur

●​ Generally, professional negligence of a doctor must be proven in court by expert


evidence from another physician.
●​ Patient need not prove negligence if the rule of res ipsa loquitur applies, meaning
“the thing speaks for itself.”
●​ This doctrine applies to both civil and criminal negligence.
●​ The error must be so self-evident that the patient’s lawyer does not need to provide
medical evidence of the doctor’s guilt; instead, the doctor must prove innocence.

Conditions for Application:

1.​ In the absence of negligence, the injury would not have occurred, indicating its
occurrence ordinarily bespeaks negligence.
2.​ The doctor had exclusive control over the injury-producing instrument or treatment.
3.​ The patient was not guilty of contributory negligence; the injury was not due to their
own voluntary act or neglect.

Examples:

●​ Blood transfusion misadventure (e.g., infected blood, blood group mismatch).


●​ Failure to administer tetanus toxoid vaccine in injury cases.
●​ Overprescription of medication leading to adverse effects.
●​ Wrong-site surgery (e.g., surgery on the wrong patient, organ, or limb).
●​ Leaving surgical instruments (e.g., scissors) inside the abdomen.
●​ Failure to remove swabs during surgery, causing complications or death.
●​ Loss of hand function due to prolonged splinting.
●​ In such situations, the breach of duty is obvious; the defense strategy typically must
show that the patient was not harmed by the breach.

Gossypiboma

●​ Refers to complications resulting from foreign materials accidentally left inside a


patient’s body (e.g., sponges, swabs, needles).
●​ Common sites of such incidents include operating rooms, labor and delivery
rooms, and labs where invasive procedures are performed.

Calculated Risk Doctrine

●​ This doctrine states that res ipsa loquitur should not apply when the injury is of a
type that may occur even with reasonable care taken.
●​ This is an important defense for doctors.
●​ The doctor must provide evidence/statistics indicating that the accepted method of
treatment involved unavoidable risks.
●​ Example: During coronary bypass surgery, if a patient dies, it may be a case of
professional accident due to the inherent 2-5% risk associated with the procedure.
Corporate Negligence

Definition:

●​ Corporate negligence refers to the failure of hospital


administration/management responsible for providing treatment, accommodation,
and facilities to follow the established standard of conduct.
●​ It occurs when the hospital fails to ensure safe and adequate care, resulting in harm
to patients.

Instances of Corporate Negligence:

1.​ Provision of Defective Equipment or Drugs:


○​ Using faulty medical equipment or expired/contaminated drugs.
2.​ Hiring or Retaining Incompetent Employees:
○​ Employing unqualified or poorly trained doctors, nurses, or staff.
3.​ Failure to Meet Accepted Standard of Care:
○​ Inadequate staffing, poor infection control measures, or lack of emergency
preparedness.
○​ Neglect in maintaining proper hygiene or safety standards within hospital
premises.
4.​ Resulting in Patient Injury:
○​ Negligence must lead to actual harm or injury to the patient to establish
liability.

Vicarious Liability (Respondeat Superior)

Definition:

●​ Vicarious liability means an employer is responsible not only for their own
negligence but also for the negligent acts of their employees.
●​ Based on the principle of “Respondeat Superior” (Latin for “let the master answer”).
●​ Also known as the “Master-Servant Rule.”

Conditions for Vicarious Liability:

1.​ Existence of Employer-Employee Relationship:


○​ The negligent party must be an employee, not an independent contractor.
2.​ Negligence Occurs Within Scope of Employment:
○​ The employee must have been performing job-related duties when the
negligence occurred.
3.​ Incident Happens While On the Job:
○​ The negligent act must occur during working hours or while performing
job-related tasks.

Vicarious Liability in Medical Practice:

1. Doctor’s Responsibility:

●​ A principal doctor is liable for the negligence of their:


○​ Medical assistants
○​ Para-medical staff
●​ Both the doctor and the assistant can be sued, even if the principal doctor wasn’t
directly involved in the negligent act.

2. Temporary Associations:

●​ If one surgeon assists another for a fee, the assistant is considered an employee of
the principal surgeon.
●​ In cases of partnerships (e.g., two doctors sharing a practice), each partner is liable
for the other’s negligence.

Liability in Surgical Procedures:

●​ If a swab, sponge, or instrument is left inside a patient after surgery:


○​ Surgeon is liable for the error.
○​ However, a surgeon is not liable for the anesthetist’s negligence, and vice
versa.

Borrowed Servant Doctrine:

●​ An employee may serve multiple employers simultaneously.


●​ Example:
○​ A nurse employed by a hospital is the hospital’s employee, but during
surgery, she is the ‘borrowed servant’ of the operating surgeon.

Liability of Physicians and Surgeons:

●​ Physicians are not liable for the negligence of competent nurses or hospital staff
unless:
○​ The negligent act was carried out under the doctor’s direct supervision and
control.

Hospital’s Vicarious Liability:

1.​ Responsible For:


○​ Negligence of its employees (nurses, technicians, interns) acting under
hospital supervision.
○​ Resident doctors and interns are considered hospital employees during
their normal duties.
2.​ Not Responsible For:
○​ Negligence of senior medical staff if the hospital can prove that proper care
was taken in selecting qualified professionals.

Shared Liability:

●​ Both employer and employee may be sued by the patient:


○​ Employees might lack financial resources to cover damages.
○​ Courts often hold both parties liable, depending on control over the
negligent act.

How Employers Can Avoid Vicarious Liability:

1.​ Prove Employee Was Not Negligent:


○​ Demonstrate the employee acted with reasonable care.
2.​ Prove Employee Was Acting Independently:
○​ If the employee went on a ‘detour’ (acting in their personal capacity, not for
the employer), the employer may not be held liable.

Definition of Consent

●​ Consent (Latin consentirez: ‘to feel or sense with’)


○​ Means voluntary agreement, compliance, or permission.
●​ According to Section 13 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872:
○​ “Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same
thing in the same sense” (meeting of the minds).

Types of Consent

Broadly, consent is classified into two types:

1.​ Implied Consent


○​ Occurs when a patient presents themselves at a doctor's clinic, implying
agreement for examination.
○​ Does not cover complex procedures (e.g., rectal/vaginal examinations, blood
withdrawal), which require expressed permission.
2.​ Expressed Consent
○​ Specifically stated by the patient in distinct and explicit language. This can
be:
■​ Oral/Verbal Consent: Obtained for minor examinations or therapeutic
procedures, preferably in the presence of a disinterested party (e.g.,
attendant or nurse).
■​ Written Consent: Required for:
■​ All major diagnostic procedures
■​ General anesthesia
■​ Surgical operations

Doctrine of Informed Consent

This doctrine implies that the patient understands the following:

1.​ His/her condition or nature of illness.


2.​ Purpose or necessity for further testing.
3.​ Natural course of condition and possible complications.
4.​ Nature of proposed procedure or treatment.
5.​ Risks and benefits of the treatment or procedure.
6.​ Risks and benefits of alternative treatments or procedures.
7.​ Prognosis in the absence of intervention.
8.​ Duration and approximate cost of treatment.
9.​ Expected outcome and follow-up.

●​ Communication: Information provided should be in simple, easy-to-understand


language, listing possible major complications to help patients make informed
decisions (informed refusal).
●​ Risk Explanation: No need to explain remote or theoretical risks that may confuse
or frighten the patient.
●​ Reasonable Information: The information required for informed consent is
determined by what a doctor deems reasonable based on best practices.
●​ Standard of Care: Physicians are held to the standard of a “reasonable physician”
dealing with a “reasonable patient” in negligence suits.

Exceptions to Informed Consent

●​ Emergencies
●​ Medical examination requested by police under Sec. 53 (1) CrPC
●​ Therapeutic privilege
●​ Therapeutic waiver
●​ Medico-legal postmortems under Sec. 174 CrPC
●​ Psychiatric examination or treatment by court order
●​ Use of placebos
●​ Treatment of prisoners

Disclosure of Information during Informed Consent (Box 1.1)

●​ Procedure Name: PCNL (Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy)


●​ Benefits: Removal of stones, alleviation of symptoms (pain, vomiting, blood in urine),
small incision, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery.
●​ Risks: Infection, bleeding, retained stone, recurrence of stone, failure to remove
stone, injury to surrounding organs, anesthesia risk.

Alternatives

●​ ESWL (Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy): May require multiple sessions,


potential failure to clear stone, pain, blocked ureter.
●​ Open Surgery: Larger incision, risks of severe bleeding, infection, prolonged hospital
stay, and longer recovery.

Emergency Situations

●​ If a patient is unconscious and faces imminent danger to life, consent is deemed to


be given (implied consent under Sec. 92 IPC).
●​ For implied consent, emergency treatment must be necessary to save life or limb,
and once this treatment is no longer required, the doctrine does not apply.

Therapeutic Privilege

●​ Full disclosure may be withheld in cases where revealing certain information could
induce anxiety (e.g., malignancy).
●​ However, full information should be provided to a competent relative..

Placebos

●​ Placebos may be used in certain conditions where the patient may benefit with
negligible risk.

Consenting Ages for Treatment


●​ Age of Consent: Legally accepted as > 12 years for medical examination and
treatment.
●​ Invasive and Diagnostic Procedures: Age of consent is > 18 years.
●​ Children < 12 years: Consent must be given by a guardian or custodian.
●​ Individuals with mental illness and intellectual disabilities must also be informed of
procedures.

Competency to Contract

●​ According to the Indian Contract Act:


○​ A person is generally competent to contract if:
■​ They have attained the age of majority (18 years in India).
■​ They are of sound mind.
■​ They are not disqualified by law.

Impairments Affecting Consent

●​ Various impairments (e.g., emotional immaturity, severe mental illness, coma) may
hinder a person’s ability to give informed consent.

Reasons for Obtaining Consent

1.​ Legal Obligation: Examining or treating without consent is considered assault


(battery) in law.
2.​ Negligence: Failure to provide required information can lead to negligence claims.
3.​ Consumer Protection Act: Not obtaining consent may be seen as a deficiency in.

General Rules for Valid Consent

1.​ Characteristics: Consent must be free, voluntary, clear, informed, direct, and
personal. It should be given without undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation,
compulsion, or coercion.
2.​ Written Consent:
○​ Though not legally required, written consent provides evidence.
○​ Should be properly formatted and witnessed by an independent party.
○​ Signed by patient (or legal guardian), doctor, and witness.
3.​ Expressed Consent:
○​ Required for procedures beyond routine exams (e.g., surgeries, blood
transfusions).
4.​ Patient Information: The purpose of examination and its inclusion in reports should
be explained.
5.​ Right to Refuse: Patients should know they have the right to refuse examination.

Special Consent Provisions

6.​ Major Consent (Sec. 87 IPC): Adults (>18 years) can consent to non-lethal harm in
good faith.
7.​ Good Faith (Sec. 88 IPC): Adults can consent to harm done in good faith for their
benefit.
8.​ Minors/Insane (Sec. 89 IPC): Cannot consent to harm; guardian consent required.
9.​ In Loco Parentis: In emergencies involving children, consent can be given by
someone in charge (e.g., teacher).
10.​Invalid Consent (Sec. 90 IPC): Consent from an insane/intoxicated person who
can't understand consequences is invalid.

Emergency Situations

11.​Implied Consent (Sec. 92 IPC): In emergencies, treatment can proceed without


consent if the patient is unable to give it and no guardian is available.
12.​Parental Consent for Adults: Parents cannot give consent for adult children in
emergencies if the patient is conscious.
13.​Due Care (Sec. 52 IPC): Any action must be done with due care for good faith to
apply.

Consent in Institutional Settings

14.​Hostel Inmates: Consent required if over 12 years; under 12, principal/warden


consents.
15.​Civil Cases: Exam must not proceed without consent.
16.​Criminal Cases: Consent required, especially in sensitive cases (e.g., rape,
pregnancy, abortion).
17.​Accused Examination (Sec. 53 CrPC): Police can request a doctor to examine an
accused person using reasonable force. Female suspects must be examined by a
female doctor or under female supervision.
18.​Arrestee Rights (Sec. 54 CrPC): Arrestees may request a doctor’s exam for their
defense.

Marriage and Reproductive Health

19.​Spousal Consent: Not needed for a partner’s treatment.


20.​Contraception and Sterilization: Requires consent from both spouses.
21.​Diagnostic vs. Therapeutic Consent: Consent for diagnostics does not imply
consent for treatment. Unauthorized treatments (except life-saving) are liable for
negligence.
22.​Combined Consent: Allowed for diagnostic and operative procedures or potential
additional procedures during surgery.

State-Mandated Procedures

23.​Mandatory Procedures: State-mandated procedures (e.g., mass immunization)


imply consent by law.
24.​Organ Donation: Will of the deceased suffices for consent after death.

Prenatal and Postmortem Consent

25.​Prenatal Diagnostics: Informed written consent of pregnant woman required.


26.​Pathological Autopsy: Requires consent from next of kin.
27.​Medico-Legal Autopsy: Does not require family consent.

Invalid Consent Situations

●​ Lack of Information: Consent is invalid if not informed.


●​ Criminal Intent: Consent for illegal acts (e.g., illegal abortion) is invalid.
●​ Fraudulent Consent: Consent obtained through misrepresentation is void.
●​ Lack of Legal Capacity: Minors and insane persons cannot give valid consent.

●​ Substituted Consent: If patient is unable, consent may be given by next of kin in the
order of succession.
●​ Blanket Consent: Broad consent at hospital admission is legally questionable.
●​ Presumed Consent: Assumes agreement unless the patient opts out explicitly.

Definition

●​ Euthanasia: Means "good death" in Greek, indicating a painless death for someone
suffering from a hopelessly incurable and painful disease.
Types of Euthanasia

1.​ Active Euthanasia: Actively administering substances to cause death.


2.​ Passive Euthanasia: Withholding or withdrawing treatment, allowing the person
to die naturally.

Classification by Consent

1.​ Voluntary Euthanasia: Requested by the individual (either during illness or


anticipated in case of incapacitation).
2.​ Non-voluntary Euthanasia: Performed when the person is incapable of
decision-making (e.g., coma or severe brain damage).
3.​ Involuntary Euthanasia: Done against the individual’s will; considered murder
ethically, morally, and legally.

Arguments Against Euthanasia

1.​ Medical Ethics: Contradicts the principles of medical practice.


2.​ Medical Advances: Future breakthroughs could make today’s incurable diseases
treatable.
3.​ Risk of Misuse: Potential for misuse by medical personnel or relatives.
4.​ Health Care Cost Control: Could be used to cut costs, prioritizing economy over
life.
5.​ Non-voluntary Risk: Could lead to euthanasia being administered without consent.
6.​ Value of Life: Undermines the inherent value and dignity of human life.
7.​ Societal Crime: Viewed as equivalent to murder or suicide, potentially encouraging
these acts.

Reasons for Euthanasia

1.​ Unbearable Pain: Allows a dignified, painless end rather than prolonged suffering.
2.​ Cost Burden: Alleviates economic and emotional strain on families.
3.​ Right to Suicide: Supports the right to end one’s life under extreme circumstances.
4.​ Limitations of Medicine: Recognizes that not all diseases can be cured.

Special Forms of Euthanasia


●​ Pediatric Euthanasia: For seriously sick or deformed infants.
●​ Geriatric Euthanasia: For severely ill elderly individuals.
●​ Battlefield Euthanasia: For soldiers with severe, non-recoverable injuries.

Legal Status and Regulations

●​ Supreme Court Ruling: Passive euthanasia allowed for patients in a permanent


vegetative state, with the decision to discontinue life support made by close
relatives or a designated person. Active euthanasia is not permitted.

●​ Global Laws: Some forms of euthanasia are legal in Belgium, Netherlands,


Luxembourg, Switzerland, and US states.
●​ Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS): Physician provides means for the patient to
end their life; action is taken by the patient. PAS and euthanasia are often
confused.

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (CPA) (Amendments: 1991, 1993, 2002)

1.​ Purpose: Protect consumer interests and ensure efficient dispute resolution.
2.​ Redressal Agencies:
○​ District Forum: Handles complaints with a value under ₹20 lakhs.
○​ State Commission: Located in state capitals.
○​ National Commission: Apex consumer body in New Delhi.
3.​ Limitation Period: Complaints must be filed within 2 years of cause of action.
4.​ Appeals:
○​ Appeals must be filed within 30 days of an order from any forum.
5.​ Penalties:
○​ Non-compliance: 1 month to 3 years imprisonment.
○​ False complaints: Penalty up to ₹10,000.
6.​ CPA and Medical Services (Supreme Court ruling in 1995):
○​ Paid medical services are included under ‘service’ as per CPA.
○​ Free services are excluded unless charges are required from some patients.

Medical Indemnity Insurance

1.​ Purpose: Provides coverage for doctors against claims of professional negligence.
2.​ Objectives:
○​ Protect professional interests of insured doctors.
○​ Arrange legal defense and pre-litigation advice.
○​ Indemnify losses directly from claims against professional negligence.

Arguments on consumer court

The Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994 (Amendments 2011,


2014)

●​ Purpose: Allows organ removal, storage, and transplantation for therapeutic


reasons; prevents organ trade.
●​ Donor Authorization: Individuals over 18 can authorize organ donation before
death.
○​ Lawful possessors may authorize if there’s no prior consent.
●​ Certification: Requires brain death certification from a panel of doctors before
removal.
●​ Unclaimed Bodies: Organs may be removed if the body is unclaimed after 48 hours.
●​ Restrictions: Only near-relatives’ organs can be transplanted pre-death;
non-relatives require Authorization Committee approval.
●​ Hospital Regulations: Only registered hospitals may perform transplants; removal
of organs at unregistered facilities is prohibited.
●​ Penalties:.
○​ Unauthorized organ removal by a doctor: 5 years imprisonment and
₹10,000 fine.
○​ Commercial dealings in human organs: 2–7 years imprisonment and
₹10,000–₹20,000 fine.
The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971

1.​ Act Overview:


○​ Enforced on 1972; amended in 2002.
○​ Allows termination of specific pregnancies by registered medical
practitioners (RMPs) for women’s health and safety.
2.​ Indications for Termination:
○​ Therapeutic: Prevents injury to physical health of the pregnant woman.
Conditions include:
■​ Cardiac disease (Grade III & IV),
■​ Chronic glomerulonephritis,
■​ Malignant hypertension,
■​ Epilepsy/Insanity,
■​ Carcinoma,
■​ Diabetes with retinopathy,
■​ Toxemia.
○​ Eugenic: Prevents birth of children with severe physical/mental
abnormalities. Conditions include:
■​ Teratogenic drug exposure (e.g., warfarin),
​ early pregnancy radiation exposure (>10 rads).
■​ Viral infections in the 1st trimester (e.g., Rubella),
■​ structural or chromosomal abnormalities,
■​ inheritable mental conditions.
○​ Socio-economic: Protects physical/mental health of women facing
economic challenges. Conditions include:
■​ Unplanned pregnancies, failure of contraception in marriage.
○​ Humanitarian: Cases of pregnancy caused by rape.
3.​ MTP Act Rules:
○​ Emergency Cases: Any RMP can terminate a pregnancy in an emergency if
needed to save the woman’s life, regardless of pregnancy duration.
○​ Length of Pregnancy:
.

4.​ Approved Places for MTP:


○​ Government hospitals.
○​ Approved facilities by the Government or District-level Committee.
5.​ RMP Qualifications:

6.​ Consent Requirements:


○​ Woman’s Consent: Mandatory unless she is a minor (<18 years) or
mentally ill (guardian’s consent required).
○​ Husband’s Consent: Not required.
7.​ Record Maintenance:
○​ maintain patient records for 5 years, ensuring confidentiality.
8.​ Non-compliance Penalties:
○​ For Doctors: 2-7 years of rigorous imprisonment, fine of ₹1,000.
○​ Cognizable Offense: Police can arrest without a warrant;
government-employed doctors face disciplinary action.
9.​ Methods for Abortion:
○​ Early-Term Abortion (before 8 weeks): Complications at 5%.
○​ Mid-Trimester Abortion: Five times more complications regardless of
method.
10.​Death Risks and Causes:
●​ By Method: Highest risks with hysterectomy, hysterotomy, instillation methods,
dilation & evacuation, and curettage.
●​ Complications:
○​ Hemorrhage, infection, emboli, and anesthesia complications.
○​ Sepsis and hemorrhage due to uterine perforation suggest possible
medical negligence.
11.​Global and Historical Perspectives:
●​ UK: Abortion permissible post-certification by two doctors.
●​ Pain Sensation Study: Fetus does not feel pain before 24 weeks.

Mtp 1971

●​ Enacted: 1971
●​ Came into Force: 1st April 1972
●​ Amendment: In 2002 to enhance women’s safety and reproductive rights.
●​ Purpose: To regulate the termination of certain pregnancies by Registered Medical
Practitioners (RMPs) for the protection and preservation of women's health and
rights.

Indications for Termination of Pregnancy

1. Therapeutic Indications:

●​ To prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.


●​ Common Conditions:
○​ Cardiac diseases (Grade III & IV)
○​ Chronic glomerulonephritis
○​ Intractable hyperemesis gravidarum
○​ Malignant hypertension
○​ Epilepsy/Insanity
○​ Cervical or breast carcinoma
○​ Diabetes with retinopathy
○​ Toxemia of pregnancy

2. Eugenic Indications:

●​ If there’s a risk of the child being born with serious physical or mental
abnormalities.
●​ Risk Factors Include:
○​ Exposure to teratogenic drugs (e.g., Warfarin) or radiation (>10 rads)
during early pregnancy.
○​ Maternal infections during the first trimester:
■​ Rubella (German measles)
■​ Chickenpox
■​ Viral hepatitis
○​ Structural abnormalities (e.g., Anencephaly)
○​ Chromosomal disorders (e.g., Down’s syndrome)
○​ Genetic conditions from parental inheritance.

3. Socio-Economic Indications:

●​ To prevent grave injury to the woman’s physical or mental health due to social or
economic hardships.
●​ Examples:
○​ Unplanned pregnancy in low socio-economic settings (80% of cases).
○​ Pregnancy resulting from the failure of contraception in married women.

4. Humanitarian Indications:

●​ In cases of pregnancy due to rape.

MTP Act Rules

1. Emergency Cases:

●​ Any RMP can perform MTP, regardless of experience, if it’s necessary to save the
woman’s life, irrespective of pregnancy duration.

2. Duration of Pregnancy for Termination:

●​ Up to 12 weeks: Termination can be done with the opinion of a single doctor.


●​ 12–20 weeks: Requires the approval of two doctors.
●​ Beyond 20 weeks:
○​ Allowed only on therapeutic grounds to save the mother’s life.
○​ Decision by a single doctor is sufficient in such cases.

Approved Places for Performing MTP:


●​ Government hospitals, or
●​ Private clinics/hospitals approved by the government or a District Level
Committee headed by the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) or District Health Officer.

Qualifications and Experience of RMPs:

For Termination Up to 12 Weeks:

●​ Must have assisted in 25 MTP cases (with at least 5 cases independently) in a


government-approved hospital.

For Termination Between 12–20 Weeks:

The doctor must have:

●​ A Postgraduate degree/diploma in Obstetrics & Gynecology, or


●​ Completed 6 months of house surgency in Obs & Gynae, or
●​ One year of practice in Obs & Gynae in a hospital setting.

Consent Requirements:

●​ Mandatory: Consent of the pregnant woman.


●​ Exception:
○​ For minors (<18 years) or mentally ill women, the guardian’s consent is
required.
●​ Not Required: Consent of the husband is NOT mandatory.

Record Maintenance:

●​ The head of the hospital must maintain a register recording details of all MTP
procedures.
●​ Records must be kept for 5 years.
●​ Confidentiality: Professional secrecy must be strictly maintained.

Penalties for Contravention of MTP Act:

1.​ For Doctors:


○​ Rigorous imprisonment: 2–7 years for violations.
○​ Fine: Up to ₹1,000 for failure to comply with regulations.
○​ Cognizable Offense:
■​ A doctor can be arrested without a warrant for violations.
■​ If a government servant, the doctor may face disciplinary actions,
including dismissal from service.
2.​ For Others:
○​ Anyone who willfully contravenes the Act is liable for similar penalties.

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012

●​ Purpose: To strengthen legal provisions for protecting children from sexual abuse
and exploitation.
●​ Definition of Child: Any person below the age of 18 years.
●​ Scope: Protects all children (both males and females) from sexual abuse.

Offences and Punishments

1.​ Penetrative Sexual Assault:


○​ Involves penetration into the vagina, mouth, urethra, or anus of a child.
○​ Punishment:
■​ Imprisonment for 7 years, extendable to life imprisonment and a fine.
■​ For aggravated cases, imprisonment for 10 years, extendable to life
and a fine.
2.​ Sexual Assault:
○​ Physical contact with sexual intent without penetration (e.g., touching).
○​ Punishment:
■​ Imprisonment for 3–5 years and a fine.
■​ For aggravated cases, imprisonment for 5–7 years and a fine.
3.​ Sexual Harassment of a Child:
○​ Includes any unwelcome sexual intent towards a child (e.g., gestures, threats,
or enticement).
○​ Punishment: Imprisonment for 3 years and a fine.
4.​ Use of Child for Pornographic Purposes:
○​ Using a child in media for sexual gratification.
○​ Punishment:
■​ Imprisonment for 5 years and a fine.
■​ For subsequent convictions, 7 years and a fine.

Key Provisions

1.​ Aggravated Offences: Committed by persons in positions of trust or authority.


2.​ Reporting Requirement: Failure to report attracts punishment of up to 6 months
imprisonment or a fine.
3.​ Police Procedures: FIR must be registered ,child’s statement can be recorded in a
preferred location by a female officer.
4.​ Medical Examination: Can be conducted before FIR registration, within 24 hours of
receiving information about the offence.
5.​ Speedy Trials: Evidence from the child must be recorded within 30 days; trial
completion is mandated within 1 year.
6.​ Burden of Proof: Shifted to the accused due to the vulnerability of children.
7.​ Protection Against Misuse: Punishment for false complaints with malicious intent.
8.​ Media Regulations: Prohibited from disclosing a child’s identity without court
permission; violations result in 6 months to 1 year imprisonment.

Indian Legal Codes Related to Criminal Justice

●​ Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860


○​ A comprehensive code defining substantive criminal law in India.
○​ Lists various offenses and prescribes punishments.
●​ Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) 1973
○​ Outlines procedures for investigation and punishment mechanisms for
offenses against substantive criminal law.
●​ Indian Evidence Act (IEA) 1872
○​ Relates to evidence for establishing facts in both criminal and civil cases.

Inquest

●​ Definition: An inquest (Latin: quaesitus, meaning "to seek") is an investigation


into the cause of death when death is not due to natural causes.
●​ Cases Requiring an Inquest:
○​ Sudden or unexplained deaths.
○​ Suicide, homicide, infanticide.
○​ Deaths from accidents, poisoning, drug mishaps, or machinery
incidents.
○​ Deaths from burns, falls, or during/after medical procedures.
○​ Alleged medical negligence or deaths within 24 hours of hospital
admission.
○​ Death of individuals in custody, mental hospitals, or correctional facilities.
○​ Dowry-related deaths.
○​ Deaths due to industrial diseases (not conducted in India).

Types of Inquests in India

1.​ Police Inquest (most common)


2.​ Magistrate Inquest

Other Inquests (not conducted in India):

●​ Coroner’s inquest
●​ Medical examiner system
●​ Procurator fiscal

Police Inquest (Sec. 174 CrPC)

●​ Conducted by: Police officer (Investigation Officer - IO), at least of senior head
constable rank.
●​ Purpose: Establish facts regarding:
○​ Identity of the deceased.
○​ Place of death.
○​ Time of death.
○​ Apparent cause of death (accidental, suicidal, homicidal, or by animal).
●​ Procedure:
○​ Police officer informs the nearest Executive Magistrate.
○​ Conducts inquiry in the presence of local witnesses (called panchas),
documented as panchnama.
○​ In non-suspicious cases, the body is released to relatives; in suspicious
cases, it is sent for postmortem.
○​ Report is forwarded to District/Sub-Divisional Magistrate.
○​ Witnesses can be summoned under Sec. 175 CrPC.
○​ Refusal to answer is punishable under Sec. 179 IPC (up to 6 months
imprisonment or a fine).

Magistrate Inquest (Sec. 176 CrPC)

●​ Conducted by: District Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, SDM, or any empowered


Executive Magistrate.
●​ Special Cases:
○​ Police firing deaths.
○​ Death/disappearance in police custody or during interrogation.
○​ Deaths of convicts in jail.
○​ Exhumation cases.
○​ Rape in police custody.
○​ Dowry-related deaths (within 7 years of marriage).
○​ Mentally ill person’s admission to psychiatric hospitals (Mental Health
Act, 1987).
●​ Process:
○​ Judicial or Metropolitan Magistrate inquiries are mandatory in cases of
custodial death, disappearance, or rape with suspicion of foul play.
○​ Magistrate informs the deceased’s family, allowing them to attend the
inquiry.
○​ Body examination by a Civil Surgeon or appointed doctor within 24
hours.

Purpose of Magistrate Inquest

●​ Ensure protection of individual rights and prevent deaths due to neglect or


brutality.
●​ Verify identity, cause, and manner of death, particularly in dowry or custodial
cases.
●​ The death is not a ‘dowry death’.
Coroner’s Inquest

●​ Coroner Qualifications: Usually an advocate, attorney, or 1st class Magistrate


with 5 years experience or a Metropolitan Magistrate.
●​ Appointed by State Government to investigate unnatural or suspicious deaths.
●​ Quasi-judicial Powers: Resembling those of a court of law with the ability to
impose penalties and remedy situations under Sec. 174 CrPC.
○​ Investigates deaths due to accident, homicide, suicide, or unknown
causes.
●​ Open Verdict: Announcement of a crime without identifying the criminal if the
perpetrator is unknown.

Medical Examiner System

●​ Common in the U.S.: Conducted in most U.S. states.


●​ Role of Medical Examiner: A Board Certified or Board-eligible forensic
pathologist conducts the inquest.
○​ Visits crime/accident scenes to gather first-hand evidence and interviews
witnesses for details on death circumstances.
○​ Performs autopsies and correlates autopsy findings with other evidence
to determine the cause and manner of death.
●​ Advantages: Superior to non-medical investigations (e.g., those led by coroners).
●​ Limitations: Does not have judicial powers—cannot examine witnesses under
oath or authorize arrests.

Procurator Fiscal (Scotland)

●​ A public prosecutor with powers to investigate criminal matters.


●​ Responsible for investigating sudden, unexplained, or suspicious deaths,
including fatal accidents.
●​ Requests autopsies performed by forensic pathologists and presents cases for
prosecution in court.
Courts of Law in India

Types of Courts:

1.​ Civil Courts


2.​ Criminal Courts

Criminal Courts (Four main types):

1.​ Supreme Court


○​ Highest judicial tribunal in India, located in New Delhi.
○​ Has supervisory power over all courts in India (Article 134 of the
Constitution).
○​ Decisions are binding on all courts.
2.​ High Court
○​ Highest court in each State, usually located in the state capital.
○​ Judges appointed by the President of India in consultation with the Chief
Justice of India and the State Governor.
○​ Handles appeals from lower courts and writ petitions under Article 226 of
the Constitution.
○​ Can try any offense and pass any sentence authorized by law (Sec. 28
CrPC).
3.​ Sessions Court
○​ Located at district headquarters; also called District Session Court.
○​ Presided over by a District and Sessions Judge.
■​ Known as District Judge in civil cases and Sessions Judge in
criminal cases.
■​ In metropolitan areas, referred to as Metropolitan Session Judge.
○​ Appointment: Done by the state government in consultation with the High
Court or by elevation from lower courts.
○​ Can try cases committed to it by a Magistrate and pass any sentence,
including the death sentence (subject to High Court confirmation).
4.​ Magistrates’ Courts (Three types)
○​ Chief Judicial Magistrate
○​ First Class Judicial Magistrate
○​ Second Class Judicial Magistrate
○​ In metropolitan cities with over 1 million population:
■​ Chief Judicial Magistrate becomes the Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate.
■​ First Class Judicial Magistrate becomes the Metropolitan
Magistrate.
○​ Judicial Magistrates of First Class appointed by the High Court to serve as
Chief Judicial Magistrates (Sec. 12 CrPC).
○​ Powers outlined in Sec. 29 CrPC: Higher courts can enhance sentences
awarded by Magistrate Courts.

Special Magistrates

●​ Types: Can be Metropolitan Judicial or Executive Magistrates.


●​ Purpose: Appointed for specific purposes, such as handling rioting cases.
●​ Juvenile Justice Act, 2000:
○​ A Board is set up for juvenile offenders, comprising:
■​ Judicial Magistrate of first class (or Metropolitan Magistrate).
■​ Two social workers, with at least one woman.
○​ This Board functions as a Bench with powers equivalent to a Judicial
Magistrate of the first class.
○​ The Magistrate on this Board is designated as the Principal Magistrate.
●​ Definition of Juvenile:
○​ Defined as a person under 18 years of age.
○​ Amendment Proposal: Allows the Board to decide if 16-18-year-olds
involved in heinous crimes (e.g., rape) should be tried in regular court or
sent to an observation home.

●​ Possible Orders for Guilty Juveniles:


○​ Return home after advice, admonition, and counseling.
○​Participate in group counseling.
○​Perform community service.
○​Pay a fine (if the juvenile is over 14 and earns money).
○​Release on probation and placed under care of parent/guardian or a fit
institution for good conduct (for up to 3 years).
○​ Sent to a special home (formerly reformatory school or Borstal) for up to 3
years.
●​ Sentencing for Juveniles:
○​ Juveniles cannot be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.
○​ If a juvenile turns 18 within a year of a heinous crime, they still serve up to 3
years beyond reaching adulthood.

Classification of Offences under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

●​ Bailable Offences:
○​ Offenses where bail is granted by law and court cannot refuse bail.
○​ Examples:
■​ Causing death by a rash act (Sec. 304-A IPC).
■​ Causing miscarriage (Sec. 312 IPC).
■​ Voluntarily causing hurt (Sec. 323 IPC).
■​ Causing grievous hurt (Sec. 325 IPC).
●​ Non-bailable Offences:
○​ Serious offenses where bail is not automatically granted.
○​ Judicial Magistrate decides on bail.
○​ Accused must be produced before a judge within 24 hours.
○​ Examples:
■​ Murder (Sec. 302 IPC).
■​ Attempt to murder (Sec. 307 IPC).
■​ Dowry death (Sec. 304-B IPC).
■​ Causing miscarriage without consent (Sec. 313 IPC).
■​ Grievous hurt by dangerous weapons (Sec. 326 IPC).
●​ Warrant Case:
○​ Cases where the offense is punishable by death, life imprisonment, or ≥ 2
years.
○​ Examples: Murder, dowry deaths, attempt to murder.
●​ Summons Case:
○​ Includes all cases other than warrant cases.
○​ Example: Voluntarily causing hurt.
●​ Cognizable Offence:
○​ Offense where a police officer can arrest without a warrant.
○​ Examples: Rape, murder, dowry death, attempt to murder (Sec. 2(c)
CrPC).
●​ Non-cognizable Offence:
○​ Police cannot arrest without a warrant.
○​ Examples: Causing miscarriage, voluntarily causing hurt (Sec. 2(l)
CrPC).

Sentences Authorized by Law (Sec. 53 IPC)

1.​ Death (hanged by neck till death).


2.​ Imprisonment for Life.
3.​ Imprisonment (rigorous or simple).
4.​ Forfeiture of Property.
5.​ Monetary Fine.
6.​ Treatment, Training, and Rehabilitation of juvenile offenders.

Capital Punishment

●​ Definition: Execution by judicial process for certain offenses (Latin capitalis:


relating to the head).
●​ Methods: Hanging, electrocution, shooting, cyanide poisoning, lethal injection,
garroting, guillotine.
●​ Sec. 354(5) CrPC, 1973: Requires death sentence to be by hanging.
○​ Also specified for Air Force, Army, Navy (either hanging or shot to death).
●​ Power of Amnesty for capital punishment rests with the President of India.
●​ Global Trends:
○​ Most democratic countries (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Europe,
much of Latin America) have abolished the death penalty.
○​ U.S. largely uses lethal injection.
○​ Guillotine was notably used during the French Revolution for decapitation
executions.

.
Subpoena/Summons

●​ Definition:
○​ A Subpoena (Latin: under punishment) is a legal document that compels
the attendance of a witness in a court of law on a specified date, time, and
place to give evidence.
○​ Failure to comply may result in legal penalties.

Legal Provisions:

●​ Sections 61–69 of CrPC (Code of Criminal Procedure) deal with summons.

Key Features:

1.​ Issuance:
○​ Issued in writing, in duplicate, signed by the presiding officer of the court,
and bears the seal of the court (Sec. 61 CrPC).
2.​ Service:
○​ Served by a police officer, court officer, or any other public servant.
3.​ Acknowledgment:
○​ The witness retains one copy (original) and returns the duplicate with their
signature as acknowledgment (Sec. 62 CrPC).

Obligations of the Witness:

●​ Mandatory Compliance: The summons must be obeyed.


●​ Failure to Attend:
1.​ In Civil Cases:
■​ The witness is liable to pay damages.
2.​ In Criminal Cases:
■​ The court may issue a notice under Sec. 350 CrPC.
■​ After a hearing, if the absence is unjustified, the court may impose:
■​ Imprisonment and/or fine
■​ Issue bailable or non-bailable warrants (Sec. 172–174 IPC
& Sec. 87 CrPC).

Special Instructions:

●​ The subpoena may require the witness to bring documents, books, or other
evidence under their control.
●​ A witness may be excused if they have a valid and urgent reason for absence.

Priority Rules When Summoned by Multiple Courts:

1.​ Criminal vs. Civil Court:


○​ Criminal courts take priority over civil courts.
2.​ Higher vs. Lower Court:
○​ The higher court has priority, regardless of the case type.
3.​ Same Type of Courts:
○​ Attend the court from which the summons was received first and inform
the other court.

Types of Subpoena:

1.​ Subpoena Duces Tecum:


○​ Requires the person to bring specific documents or evidence (e.g.,
postmortem reports, medico-legal documents) to court.
2.​ Subpoena Ad Testificandum:
○​ Requires the individual to appear in court to testify as a witness.

Interesting Historical Fact:

●​ Ancient Persian Law:


○​ Failure to respond to the King’s summons was punishable by death.

Conduct Money

●​ Definition: Fee provided to a witness in civil cases for attending court.


○​ If unpaid or insufficient, the doctor can inform the Judge before giving
evidence, who will decide the amount.
○​ Criminal cases: No initial fee; however, conveyance charges and daily
allowance are provided as per government rules.

Medical Evidence

●​ Definition: Legal means to prove or disprove any medico-legal issue in question.


●​ Types:
1.​ Documentary
2.​ Oral

Documentary Evidence

●​ Definition: Includes all documents, written or printed, produced in court for


inspection during trial.

Types of Documentary Evidence

1.​ Medical Certificates


○​ Issued by a qualified registered medical practitioner (RMP) related to ill
health, death, insanity, age, or sex.
○​ Death Certificates:
■​ No fee is charged.
■​ Should not be issued without inspecting the body.
■​ If the cause of death is uncertain, it should be reported to the
police.
○​ False Certificates: giving false evidence (Sec. 197 IPC) and is punishable
with up to 7 years’ imprisonment and a fine (Sec. 193 IPC).

2.​ Medico-Legal Reports


○​ Prepared by a doctor upon request by an investigating officer, usually in
criminal cases (e.g., injury, postmortem, rape, pregnancy).
○​ Postmortem Reports:
■​ Made only with a requisition from a police officer or magistrate.
○​ Court Testimony: doctor testifies to the facts under oath.
○​ Should reflect competence, lack of bias, and professional advice. Use of
technical terms should be minimized.

3.​ Dying Declaration


○​ Definition: A written or oral statement of a dying person due to an unlawful
act, addressing the cause of death or surrounding circumstances (Sec. 32
IEA).
○​ Requirements:
■​ No specific person or format prescribed for recording.
■​ Must be supported by corroborative evidence (Sec. 157 IEA).
○​ Procedure:
■​ Doctor Certification: The person is conscious and mentally fit
(compos mentis).
■​ No Oath Administered: Based on the belief that a dying person
speaks the truth.
■​ Simple Narrative: Should be recorded without alteration.
■​ Witnesses: If imminent, may be recorded by a doctor or police
officer in presence of two witnesses if a Magistrate cannot attend.
■​ Seal & Delivery: Sent to Magistrate in sealed cover.
4.​ Miscellaneous:
○​ Expert Opinions from Books.
○​ Depositions from previous judicial proceedings.
Difference in Dying Declaration in Indian and British Law

●​ UK: Requires expectation of immediate death and applies only in homicide cases.
●​ India: No immediate death expectation; applicable in broader cases.

Oral Evidence

●​ Definition: All statements allowed or required by court from a witness concerning


facts under inquiry (Sec. 3 IEA).
●​ Requirements:
○​ Must be direct (from an eyewitness, Sec. 60 IEA).
○​ Priority over documentary evidence due to cross-examination.

Exceptions to Oral Evidence

1.​ Dying Declaration: Accepted if the victim dies (Sec. 32 IEA).


2.​ Expert Opinions: From published treatises are admitted without author’s oral
evidence (Sec. 60 IEA).
3.​ Deposition of Medical Witness: Accepted in higher court if attested by a
magistrate (Sec. 291 CrPC).
4.​ Reports by Government Experts: E.g., Chemical Examiners, admitted without oral
examination (Sec. 293 CrPC).
5.​ Evidence from Previous Judicial Proceedings: Admitted if witness is unavailable
(Sec. 33 IEA).
6.​ Public Records: Birth and death certificates, marriage certificates.
7.​ Hospital Records: Routine entries (e.g., admission, discharge).

Other Types of Evidence

●​ Circumstantial Evidence: Based on collateral facts that allow inference and are
consistent with direct evidence.
●​ Hearsay Evidence: Statements offered by a witness that are based on what others
have said.

Res Gestae

●​ Doctrine: Allows certain statements as exceptions to the hearsay rule if closely


associated with events in question.

Witness

●​ Definition: A person giving sworn testimony (evidence) in court.

Types of Witnesses

1.​ Common or Lay Witness.


2.​ Expert or Skilled Witness:
○​ Expert Witness: Trained in technical or scientific subjects.
○​ Professional Witness: Medical practitioners providing factual medical
evidence based on personal observation (e.g., examination findings).
●​ Difference Between Professional and Expert Witness:
○​ Professional Witness: Describes what they observed.
○​ Expert Witness: Can offer opinions and respond to hypothetical
questions.

Hostile Witness

●​ Definition: A witness who intentionally conceals the truth or provides false


evidence.
●​ Types:
○​ Any witness can be declared hostile if testimony contradicts prior
statements.
○​ Courts can consider reliable parts of a hostile witness's deposition.

.
Identification

●​ Definition: Determination of a person’s individuality based on specific physical


characteristics.
●​ Types:
1.​ Complete (Absolute): Absolute fixation of a person’s individuality.
2.​ Partial (Incomplete): Determination of some aspects (e.g., race, sex, age,
stature), while others remain unknown.

Necessity of Identification

1.​ In Living Persons:

○​ Criminal Cases:
■​ Persons accused of assault, murder, or rape.
■​ Interchange of newborns in hospitals.
■​ Impersonation cases.
■​ Absconding soldiers and criminals.
■​ Missing persons.
■​ Cases of disputed sex.
○​ Civil Cases:
■​ Marriage.
■​ Passport/license.
■​ Inheritance.
■​ Insurance claims.
2.​ In Dead Persons:
○​ Fire, explosion, and accident victims.
○​ Unknown dead bodies found in public places (road, fields, railway
compartment, water).
○​ Decomposed bodies.
○​ Mutilated bodies.
○​ Skeletons.
●​ Doctor's Role: Before identifying a patient in court, a doctor should verify
identification marks noted previously.

Corpus Delicti

●​ Definition:
●​ Corpus delicti (‘body of offence’) refers to the principle that it must be proven that a
crime has actually occurred before a person can be convicted of committing the
crime.
●​ In Homicide Charges
1.​ Identification of Dead Body: Positive identification of the victim.
2.​ Proof of Criminal Act: Evidence that death was caused by the accused’s actions.
●​ Includes:
○​ Body of the victim.
○​ Bullet or clothing showing weapon marks.
○​ Photographs showing fatal injuries.
●​ Importance: The main part of corpus delicti is to establish identity of the body and
violence inflicted at a specific time and place by the accused.
●​ Murder Trials: Identification of a dead body and proof of corpus delicti are essential
for a sentence, especially when decomposed or unclaimed bodies are presented.

Identification Data
●​ Primary Characteristics of Identification:
○​ Sex, age, and stature are fundamental characteristics and remain unaltered
even after death.
Sex and Gender Overview

●​ Sex: Biological identity (male/female) based on genetics, physiology, anatomy.


●​ Gender: Social identity (masculine/feminine) based on societal roles.
●​ Intersex: Mixed sexual characteristics affecting body, organs, and behavior.

Evidence of Sex

1.​ Most Certain: Presence of ovaries (female) or testes (male).


2.​ Highly Probable: Sexual structures (e.g., developed breasts and vagina in
females; hair distribution and penis in males).
3.​ Presumptive: Appearance, voice, body shape.

Importance of Sex Determination

●​ Identification: Establishing identity in legal matters.


●​ Sports: Physiological criteria due to differences in endogenous androgen.
●​ Legal and Social Matters: Relevant in marriage, inheritance, paternity, rape
cases.

Situations Requiring Determination

●​ Common: Sports eligibility, pre-employment checks, sex-specific crimes.


●​ Challenges:

Challenges:

●​ Intersex individuals (e.g., natural or acquired characteristics).Mixed characteristics.


●​ Transvestism: Cross-dressing for sexual gratification.
●​ Transgender: Gender identity differing from assigned sex.
●​ Transsexuals: Underwent sex reassignment surgery.
●​ Concealed sex: Individuals hiding true sex.
●​ Decomposition and skeletal remains: Identification through uterus or prostate.

Sex Verification Tests

1.​ Physical Exam: External genitalia inspection.


2.​ Nuclear Sexing: Barr body detection in cells.
3.​ Gonadal Biopsy: Confirm internal gonads and chromosomes.
4.​ Gene-Based Test: SRY gene detection for males.
5.​ Testosterone Levels: Differentiation using <10 nmol/L for females.
●​ Combined tests are often needed due to sexual development disorders
complicating results.

Nuclear Sexing

Definition: A method for determining sex in ambiguous, decomposed, mutilated bodies or


fragmentary remains.

Histological Examination

1.​ Barr Body (Sex Chromatin)


○​ Inactive X-chromosome in female somatic cells.
○​ Found as a dark-staining mass near the nuclear membrane.
○​ Seen in buccal smear tests; absent in Turner’s syndrome (XO), two Barr
bodies in XXX.
2.​ Davidson Body
○​ A drumstick-shaped nuclear attachment in female neutrophils.
3.​ Sex Chromosomes (XX or XY)
○​ Determined from dividing cells in bloodstains, cartilage, bone marrow,
teeth pulp, and hair roots.
○​ Hair follicles resist decay and can show Barr body and Y-chromosome.
4.​ Staining Techniques
○​ Y-chromosome: Stained with Quinacrine dihydrochloride for bright
fluorescence.
○​ X-chromosome: Stained with Fluorescent Feulgen reaction using
Acriflavin Schiff reagent to show a bright yellow spot in nuclei.

Disorders of Sexual Development (DSD)

Definition: Conditions where external genitalia don’t align with chromosomal or gonadal
identity. Previously termed as “intersex.”

Types of DSD

1.​ Ovotesticular DSD (True Hermaphroditism)


○​ Rare condition with both ovarian and testicular tissues.
○​ Can have male or female chromatin patterns (46XX, 46XY, or mosaics).
2.​ Gonadal Dysgenesis
○​ Defective gonad formation, leading to underdeveloped, dysfunctional
gonads.
○​ Seen in conditions like Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome, Swyer
syndrome.
3.​ Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (AIS)
○​ Mutation in the androgen receptor gene; genetic males (XY) fail to develop
male characteristics.
○​ Complete AIS (cAIS): Appears as female with female genitalia but lacks
reproductive organs.
○​ Partial AIS: Range of features from mildly virilized female to undervirilized
male genitalia.
4.​ 5-Alpha Reductase Deficiency (5-ARD)
○​ Autosomal recessive disorder; genetic males (XY) born with ambiguous
genitalia due to inability to convert testosterone to DHT.
○​ Individuals show male characteristics at puberty despite ambiguous
genitalia.
5.​ Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH)
○​ Excessive testosterone in females due to adrenal gland dysfunction,
leading to male characteristics.
○​ Most commonly caused by 21-hydroxylase deficiency.

Legal and Social Updates

●​ Supreme Court mandated rights for transgender individuals, including welfare


programs, education, healthcare, and employment.
●​ A third gender category, "transgender," is added on identification documents
(e.g., voter and Aadhar cards), not including sexual orientation categories (e.g.,
gay, lesbian, bisexual).
Age Determination Methods

●​ Age-related features include:


1.​ Dental eruption
2.​ Epiphyseal unions
3.​ Pubic symphyseal morphology
4.​ Cranial suture closures
5.​ Mandibular and sacral changes
6.​ Miscellaneous:
■​ Secondary sexual characteristics
■​ Age-related degenerative conditions

Dentition in Determining Age

●​ Age estimation through dental eruption and calcification.


●​ Common methods include Stack’s method, Miles method, Boyde’s method, and
Gustafson’s method.

Key Points:

●​ Alveolar cavities (where teeth are embedded) form around 3–4 months of
intrauterine life (IUL).
●​ At birth, rudiments of temporary teeth and the 1st permanent molars are present.
●​ Teeth structure:
○​ Each tooth has a crown, neck, and root.
○​ Enamel (hardest substance in the body) covers the crown; cementum covers
the root, attaching it to the alveolar bone via the periodontal membrane.

Tooth Development:

●​ Formation sequence: Begins with a bony crypt and crown mineralization;


proceeds from crown tips down to the tooth sides.
●​ Root formation starts after the crown is complete and ceases with apical foramen
reduction.
●​ Deciduous teeth mineralization begins in utero (2nd trimester), while the third
molar root completes around 20 years of age.

Eruption Factors:

●​ Heredity
●​ Environment
●​ Nutrition
●​ Endocrine factors

Types of Teeth
1.​ Temporary (Deciduous/Milk) Teeth
○​ Total 20 teeth: 4 incisors, 2 canines, 4 molars per jaw.
○​ Eruption starts around 6–7 months after birth, completes by 2–3 years.
○​ Factors affecting eruption:
■​ Delayed in cases like rickets.
■​ Premature or even present at birth in congenital syphilis.
2.​ Permanent Teeth
○​ Total 32 teeth: 4 incisors, 4 premolars, 2 canines, 6 molars per jaw.
Gustafson’s Method for Age Estimation

●​ Microscopic examination of a tooth’s longitudinal section to assess wear and tear


with age.
●​ Effective for estimating age between 25–60 years.
●​ Useful mainly for examining dead bodies or skeletal remains (tooth extraction
required).

Procedures Before Tooth Extraction

●​ Estimate degree of periodontosis before extraction.


●​ Tooth is ground down on glass slabs to about 1 mm for transparency estimation.
●​ Further ground to about ¼ mm for microscopic examination.
●​ Anterior teeth are preferred; merit decreases from incisors to premolars, while
molars are unsuitable.
●​ No changes are visible until 15 years of age.
●​ Error margin is ±10–15 years; higher error above 50 years.

Scoring System for Changes (0–3 Points)

●​ 0: No change
●​ 1: Beginning of change
●​ 2: Obvious change
●​ 3: Maximum change
Age Estimation from Ossification of Bones

1.​ Clavicle Ossification


○​ The clavicle is the first bone to ossify.
■​ Beginning in the 5th–6th postovulatory week from two primary
ossification centers.
○​ A secondary ossification center forms at the sternal end between 15–17
years and fuses by 20–22 years.
2.​ Primary Ossification Centers in the Fetus
○​ By 11–12 weeks IUL, there are 806 ossification centers.
○​ At birth, there are 450 ossification centers, eventually reducing to 206
bones in adults as they unite with adjacent centers.
3.​ Process of Ossification and Fusion
○​ Ossification begins centrally in an epiphysis and spreads peripherally.
○​ The fusion of epiphysis and diaphysis is termed as union..
4.​ Grades of Epiphyseal Union
○​ Researchers use five grades to categorize epiphyseal union:
■​ Unobservable (0)
■​ Beginning (1)
■​ Active (2)
■​ Recent (3)
■​ Complete (4)
○​ These grades may provide a more accurate age estimate.
5.​ Ossification of Specific Bones
○​ Capitate and Hamate Bones: Ossify during infancy (around 1 year), with
capitate preceding hamate.
○​ Between 2–6 years, the number of carpal bones visible on X-ray indicates
the approximate age (e.g., 3 carpal bones = 3 years).
6.​ Age Estimation by Long Bone Epiphyses
○​ If all epiphyses of long bones are united, the individual is likely over 25
years.
7.​ Range of ± 6 Months for Union Estimation
○​ Age estimation based on union of epiphyses has a ± 6-month range.
○​ In females, epiphyseal union generally occurs 1–2 years earlier than in
males.

Medico-legal Importance of Age

1.​ Evidence Competency


○​ A child of any age can give evidence if the court is satisfied with the child's
understanding and truthfulness (Sec. 118 IEA).
2.​ Criminal Abortion
○​ A post-childbearing woman cannot be charged with procuring criminal
abortion.
3.​ Identification
○​ Approximate age is critical for establishing identity in forensic
investigations.
4.​ Impotence and Sterility
○​ Before puberty, a boy is sterile though not impotent; a woman becomes
sterile after menopause.
Tattoo Marks
●​ Definition: Tattoos are designs made in the skin by small puncture wounds with
needles dipped in coloring matter, attached to an oscillating unit that drives
needles in and out of the skin at high speeds (50–3000 times per minute).
●​ Dyes Used: Common dyes include indigo, cobalt, carbon, vermilion, cadmium,
selenium, Prussian blue, and Indian ink.
●​ Characteristics to Note: Color, design, size, and location of tattoos should be
observed.

Factors Affecting Tattoo Permanency

●​ Permanent Tattoos:
○​ Use of black, blue, and red dyes.
○​ Depth of dye penetration reaching the dermis.
○​ Body part protected by clothing.
●​ Latent (Faded) Tattoos:
○​ Made visible by rubbing and examining with magnifying lens,
high-contrast photography, computer image enhancement, UV lamp, or
infrared photography.
●​ Detection in Decomposed Bodies:
○​ Tattoos can still be recognized in decomposed bodies and those
recovered from water.
○​ Lymph nodes can contain pigment from tattoos, visible during autopsy
(e.g., in axillary lymph nodes for upper extremity tattoos).

Complications of Tattoos

●​ Possible risks include septic inflammation, abscess, gangrene, syphilis,


hepatitis B, AIDS, leprosy, and tuberculosis.

Classification of Tattoos

1.​ Traumatic Tattoos ("natural tattoos"): Result from accidental injuries (e.g.,
roadside injuries, close-range firearm injuries, pencil lead).
2.​ Amateur Tattoos: Done at home with single-color ink, varying depths.
3.​ Professional Tattoos: Made by trained artists using multiple colors, applied
uniformly under the skin.
4.​ Cosmetic Tattoos ("permanent makeup"): Used to cover skin discolorations,
tattoo hair follicles, or for corneal tattooing.
5.​ Medical Tattoos: Used for medical alerts (e.g., diabetes), blood type,
reconstructive purposes, or marking radiation fields.

Erasure of Tattoos
1.​ Surgical Methods:
○​ Dermabrasion: Using dermabraders, tannic acid, silver nitrate, or
trichloroacetic acid.
○​ Laser Removal: Q-switched Nd​
laser vaporizes dye particles, expelled in gaseous form.
○​ Complete Excision and Skin Grafting.
○​ Burns with hot iron.
○​ Scarification and carbon dioxide snow.
2.​ Electrolysis.
3.​ Caustic Substances: Using inflammatory-causing agents (e.g., papain in
glycerin) to create a superficial scar.

Medico-legal Importance of Tattoos

●​ Identity: Tattoos help identify deceased or decomposed individuals through


names, dates, or significant symbols.
●​ Political Affiliations: Symbols like hammer and sickle, lotus, or hand.
●​ Race: Cultural or traditional tattoos (e.g., chest and limb tattoos in Japanese
culture).
●​ Profession/Occupation: Specific tattoos linked to gangs, or occupations like coal
miners who develop visible tattoos.
●​ Behavioral Characteristics:
○​ Tattoos may indicate high-risk behaviors: alcohol/drug use, violence,
weapon carrying, or eating disorders.
○​ Erotic Tattoos for individuals with specific preferences, drug users using
tattoos to conceal injection sites, and tattoos signifying affiliations or
social status.

Dactylography (Dactyloscopy)

●​ Definition: Dactylography, also known as dermatoglyphics or the Galton system,


is the study of fingerprints for identification.
○​ First used by Sir William Herschel in 1858.
○​ Systematized by Sir Francis Galton in 1892.
●​ Fingerprints:
○​ Friction ridge skin is present on fingers, palms, and soles (some primates
also have it).
○​ Ridges form patterns on fingertips by the 12th–16th week of intrauterine life
and are completed by the 24th week.
○​ Patterns are unique to each individual and remain unchanged throughout
life unless the dermis is damaged.
○​ Temporary loss of fingerprints can occur from swelling (e.g., bee sting), but
they return once the swelling subsides.
○​ Permanent erasure can be caused by burns, acids, or plastic surgery.
Factors Affecting Ridge Patterns

●​ Genetic Influence: While genetics impact the basic shapes of fingerprint patterns,
identical twins still have unique fingerprints.
●​ Pattern Atrophy: Occurs in celiac disease, eczema, psoriasis, and certain genetic
disorders (e.g., Baird syndrome, dyskeratosis congenita).

Fingerprint Patterns

1.​ Basic Patterns:


○​ Composite: Contains multiple patterns, sometimes referred to as accidental.
○​ Scar: If present, it adds value to the identification process.

Recording of Fingerprints

●​ Procedure:
○​ Hands are washed and dried before recording.
○​ Plain (dab) impression: Gently pressing inked fingertip on paper.
○​ Rolled impression: Rolling inked finger from side to side.
○​ For criminals, prints of all ten digits are taken.
○​ For legal documents, left thumb impression for males and right thumb for
females is customary.
●​ Postmortem:
○​ If fingertips are shriveled, they are soaked in alkaline solution.
○​ Surface smoothened with glycerin, paraffin, or air injection if needed.

Types of Evidentiary Fingerprints

1.​ Patent (Visible): Made by grease, dirt, or blood, needing no additional processing.
2.​ Plastic (Impression): Fingerprint indentations on soft surfaces like soap or putty,
with three-dimensional character.
3.​ Latent (Invisible): Needs development or enhancement to be visible for
comparison.

Development/Enhancement of Latent Prints

●​ Latent Prints: Key example of Locard’s Principle of Exchange—when two objects


come in contact, there is a material transfer, making latent prints crucial for
evidence.
●​ Latent Print Residue Composition:
○​ Palmar and plantar surfaces have sweat glands (eccrines) but lack hair and
sebaceous glands.
○​ Sweat Composition: Salts (sodium and potassium chlorides) and organic
compounds (amino acids, urea, lactic acid); sebaceous contamination
often occurs from face-touching.
○​ Fingerprint Durability: Prints can persist indefinitely unless exposed to
extreme conditions.
○​ Development Techniques based on knowledge of residue composition.

Fingerprint Development

A. For Non-Porous Surfaces (e.g., glass, metal, plastic)

●​ Visual Examination: Oblique illumination may reveal fingerprints on smooth


surfaces.
●​ Fluorescence Examination: High-intensity light (argon-ion laser or UV) may
make prints visible.

Development Techniques:

1.​ Vacuum Metal Deposition (VMD): Most sensitive; uses thermally evaporated
gold and zinc to develop prints, even on surfaces that were submerged.
2.​ Fingerprint Powders: Common but less sensitive. Specialized powders (e.g.,
milled aluminum, molybdenum disulfide) for smooth surfaces; granular
powders for contaminated surfaces.
3.​ Superglue Fuming: Effective on rough/grained surfaces; methyl or ethyl
cyanoacrylate polymerizes with latent prints.
4.​ Small Particle Reagent (SPR): Molybdenum disulfide in detergent solution
adheres to fats in fingerprints.
5.​ Iodine Fuming: Oldest method; forms a brown image suitable for photographing.

B. For Porous Surfaces (e.g., paper, cardboard, wallpaper)

●​ Visual Examination: Less effective on porous surfaces.


●​ Fluorescence Examination: Sometimes effective using light sources.

Development Techniques:

1.​ DFO (1,8-diaza-9-fluorenone): Reacts with amino acids to form a fluorescent


compound; not suitable for wet surfaces.
2.​ Ninhydrin: Reacts with amino acids to produce a purple color, Ruhemann’s
purple, usable on crime scenes.
3.​ Powders: Smooth papers may be treated with black or magnetic powder.
4.​ Superglue Fuming: Sometimes useful for smooth surfaces like cigarette packs.
5.​ Physical Developer: Only method for wet porous surfaces; uses silver nitrate
solution.

Other Methods for Latent Print Detection

●​ Radioactive Sulfur Dioxide: Useful for fabrics and adhesive tapes.


●​ Sudan Black: Useful for greasy or food-contaminated surfaces.
●​ Osmium Tetroxide: Useful for both porous and non-porous surfaces.
●​ Electronography: Detects prints using lead dust and X-rays.
●​ Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM): Uses an energy dispersive X-ray
spectrometer but requires sample cutting.
Identification Protocol

●​ Examination: Unknown impression is analyzed, comparing minutiae to known


samples.
●​ Comparison Factors: Considers minutiae count, rarity, and clarity; recording
differences (e.g., pressure) are accounted for.
●​ Conclusion: Can result in insufficient detail, exclusion, or identification.

Fingerprint Classification

●​ Modified Henry System: Used in the US for classifying 10-print sets.


●​ Computerized Systems: Have reduced the need for manual classification;
enables large-scale searches.
●​ 1973 Resolution: Replaced a 12-point minutiae rule with a "floating threshold"
for identification.

Medico-Legal Applications

1.​ Criminal Identification: Matching fingerprints at crime scenes.


2.​ Fugitive Identification: Cross-checking with known prints.
3.​ Cross-Border Information Exchange: With foreign identification bureaus.
4.​ Unknown Deceased/Amnesiac Identification: Useful in cases of missing persons
or unconscious individuals.
5.​ Disaster Work: Identifying disaster victims.
6.​ Newborn Identification: Preventing accidental exchanges.
7.​ Licensing and Security Applications: For vehicle, firearm, and access control.
8.​ Prevention of Forgery: Detects identity theft and forgery in banking.
9.​ Electronic Fingerprint Readers: Used in computers for login authentication.
10.​School Applications: For attendance, library access, and cashless payments
(noted privacy concerns).
11.​Child Fingerprinting: Suggested by Canadian police for kidnapping prevention.

Historical Highlights

●​ Ridgeology: Examines all volar area ridges for identification.


●​ Galton’s "Finger Prints" (1892): Classic publication on fingerprint analysis.
●​ First Fingerprint Bureau (Kolkata, 1897): Established for criminal identification.
●​ Sir Edward Henry’s System: Basis of the Henry classification system.
●​ AFIS (Automated Fingerprint Identification System): Uses algorithms for
high-speed matching of fingerprint data.

Poroscopy

●​ Definition: Poroscopy refers to the specialized study of the pore structure found on
the papillary ridges of the fingers as a means of identification.
●​ Pores:
○​ Ridges on fingers and hands are studded with microscopic pores from the
ducts of subepidermal sweat glands.
○​ Density: Each millimeter of ridge contains 9–18 pores (approx. 550–950
pores per square centimeter on fingers).
○​ Location: Fewer pores on palms and soles (~400).
●​ Discovery: Developed by Edmond Locard in 1912.
○​ Observed that pores, like ridge characteristics, are permanent,
immutable, and individual.
○​ Useful for identification when ridge characteristics are insufficient.

Edgeoscopy

●​ Definition: The study of the characteristics formed by the sides/edges of papillary


ridges.
○​ Term coined by Salil K. Chatterjee in 1962.
●​ Purpose: Focuses on the alignment, shape of ridge units, and the relationship
between edges and pores near ridge edges.
●​ Limitations: Impractical as a sole means of identification.

Footprints

●​ Identification: Skin patterns of toes and heels are as distinct and permanent as
those of fingers.
○​ Used in maternity hospitals to prevent infant exchange and air force
personnel identification.

Forensic Podiatry

●​ Definition: Specialty applying clinical podiatric knowledge for person identification.


○​ Involves identification through podiatry records, footprints, footwear, and
gait analysis (e.g., CCTV).
●​ Key Technique: Comparison of foot impressions inside shoes.

Lip Prints (Cheiloscopy)


)

●​ Definition: The study of lip prints.


○​ Unique to individuals, lip prints are formed when lips make direct contact
with an object at a crime scene.
●​ Revealing Lip Prints:
○​ Found on objects like cutlery, windows, plastic bags, cigarette ends.
●​ Types of Lip Prints (Suzuki Classification):
○​ Type I: Vertical grooves.
○​ Type II: Partial-length grooves.
○​ Type III: Branched grooves.
○​ Type IV: Reticular (wire mesh) pattern.
○​ Type V: Irregular, non-classified patterns.
●​ Enhancement and Utilization:
○​ Fingerprint powders and Aquaprint for enhancement.
○​ Cyanoacrylamide and fixing on foil also used.
○​ Middle part of the lower lip (10mm) is commonly analyzed.
●​ Limitations: Use in criminal cases is limited as credibility in courts is not firmly
established.

Hair Examination (Tricology)

●​ Importance: Hair is virtually indestructible, even in advanced decomposition,


and can be linked to a crime or weapon.
●​ Key Areas:
○​ Root: Located at the base, within the hair follicle.
○​ Shaft: Part above the skin, tapers to the tip.
●​ Hair Structure:
○​ Cuticle: Outermost layer with non-pigmented scales.
○​ Cortex: Middle layer with elongated cells containing pigment granules and
keratin.
○​ Medulla: Inner layer with keratinized cells.
Fibers

●​ Classification:
○​ Natural fibers (animal, vegetable, mineral) and artificial fibers (synthetic,
natural-polymer, and other fibers).
●​ Key Differentiation: Animal fibers, except silk, can be considered hair fibers.
●​ Techniques:
○​ Microscopy is used to detect distinctive features of natural fibers.
○​ Infrared spectrophotometry for identifying synthetic fibers.
Identification of Human or Animal Hair

●​ Human vs. Animal Hair: Differentiated by medullary index (MI), ratio of medulla to
cortex diameter.
●​ Formula: MI = Diameter of medulla / Diameter of cortex.

Determining Racial Profile from Hair

●​ Racial Differences: Variances in medulla, pigment, and cross-sectional shape.


●​ Limitations: Less accurate for mixed ancestry.

Hair Origin from Body Part

●​ Scalp: Long, soft, circular cross-section.


●​ Beard/Moustache: Thick, blunt tip, triangular cross-section.
●​ Axillary/Pubic: Short, curly, irregular.
●​ Eyebrow/Nostrils: Short, stiff, tapered, triangular cross-section.
●​ Body Hair: Fine, soft, varied medulla, mild pigmentation.

Gender and Hair Characteristics

●​ Male: Thicker, darker, coarser hair, beard/moustache-specific.


●​ Female: Barr bodies detectable in follicles; DNA analysis required if root sheath
is present.

Estimating Age from Hair

●​ Infants: Fine, soft, non-pigmented, non-medullated hair.


●​ Adults: Coarse, pigmented, complex cuticle.
●​ Aging Signs: Gray hair (40+), medullary changes, pigment distribution alterations.

Alteration or Disease in Hair

●​ Dyed/Bleached Hair: Dry, brittle, abrupt color change indicates bleaching;


fluorescence microscopy reveals dye.
●​ Curly/Constricted: Suggests permanent waving.
●​ Disease Effects: Lighter color due to malnutrition or deficiencies; fungal
infections leave transverse lines.

Matching Hair with Suspect or Victim

●​ Blood Group: Determinable from a single hair bulb.


●​ DNA Profiling: Standard (root structure) and mitochondrial DNA (shaft only) for
matching.

Hair Removal Analysis

●​ Natural Fall: Distorted, atrophied bulb.


●​ Forced Removal: Ruptured sheath, swollen bulb.
●​ Cut vs. Break: Clean cut by weapon; irregular break if snapped.

Cause of Injury from Hair Analysis

●​ Natural Hair: Tapered, non-medullated tip.


●​ Sharp Weapon: Clean cut.
●​ Blunt Force: Flattened, split shaft.
●​ Burns/Firearms: Swollen, twisted, unique odor.

Medico-Legal Applications

1.​ Identification: Hair as physical evidence in crimes (grip of deceased).


2.​ Link to Crime Scene: Hair matching on weapons, victims, suspects.
3.​ Assault Clues: Trace evidence (e.g., stains) on hair.
4.​ Burns vs. Scalds: Singed hair with large vacuoles indicates burns.
5.​ Singeing: Suggests burns or close firearm discharge.
6.​ Alcohol Testing: Indicates excessive alcohol consumption.
7.​ Estimating Time Since Death: Based on known hair growth rates.
8.​ Age/Sex Identification: Through visual and chemical hair traits.
9.​ Cause of Death: Detect poisons in hair (e.g., arsenic).

Dental Profiling and Charting

●​ Dental Profiling: In cases of unidentified bodies, resistant dental tissues (teeth)


provide age, ancestry, and socio-economic clues.
●​ Sex Identification: Microscopic analysis or DNA.
●​ Teeth Charting: Records extractions, fillings, artificial/prosthetic teeth, hygiene,
malpositions, racial indicators.
●​ Common Systems: Universal, Palmer, Haderup, FDI, Modified FDI,
Diagrammatic.
Medico-Legal Applications of Dental Profiling

1.​ Identification: Ideal for burned, mutilated remains, resistant to decomposition.


2.​ Age Estimation: By assessing wear patterns and dental development.
3.​ Identification by Race/Sex: Tooth morphology suggests race and sex.
4.​ Grievous Hurt: Tooth fractures/dislocations classified under grievous hurt (Sec.
320 IPC).
5.​ Toxins Detection: Metals/poisons (e.g., lead) detectable postmortem.
6.​ Denture Identification: Inscriptions on dentures aid identification.
7.​ Bite Mark Evidence: Criminal identification through bite marks.

Exhumation

Definition: Lawful removal of a buried body from a grave for postmortem examination.

●​ A situation where a previously-buried dead body is ‘dug up,’ ‘unearthed,’ or


‘disinterred’.
●​ Purpose: To perform an autopsy on a body that was not initially autopsied, often for
criminal or civil investigation.
●​ Exclusion: Does not refer to a second autopsy or clandestinely buried bodies.

Reasons for Exhumation

1.​ Criminal Cases


○​ Determine cause and manner of death in suspected homicide disguised as
suicide.
○​ Investigate deaths related to criminal abortion or negligence.
○​ Retrieve evidence, such as a bullet, from the body in firearm cases.
2.​ Civil Cases
○​ Identification for accident claims, insurance, inheritance, and professional
liability.
○​ Disputed Identity: Cases involving potential errors in burial or separation
overseas.

Authorization

●​ Exhumation requires a written order from a First-Class Magistrate, District


Magistrate, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, or Executive Magistrate.
●​ Police do not have the authority to order exhumation.
Procedure for Exhumation

1.​ Timing: Conducted in broad daylight, preferably starting in the morning.


2.​ Supervision: A medical officer, magistrate, and police officer must be present.
3.​ Grave Identification: Confirm location via burial plot, headstone, or marker.
4.​ Soil Collection: Preserve soil samples from above, below, and sides of the body in
labeled jars.
5.​ Avoid Contamination: Do not use disinfectants/pesticides on the body to prevent
interference with poison detection.
6.​ Body Position Documentation: Record body’s position and appearance; make
sketches of the grave and body.
7.​ Photography: Photograph the grave and the body or skeleton.
8.​ Lifting the Body: Use a plank or plastic sheet to carefully raise the body if
decomposition allows.
9.​ Postmortem: Body is sent for a detailed postmortem with a case history.
10.​Advanced Decomposition: Preserve viscera for chemical analysis; examine
bones if only skeleton remains.

Time Limits

●​ India: No specific time limit.


●​ France: 10 years.
●​ Germany: 30 years.

Global Practices

●​ Europe: Exhumation for forensic, relocation, or disposal method changes.


●​ USA: Laws vary by state; often vague.
●​ Religious Restrictions: Exhumation generally forbidden in Jewish and Islamic law,
with few exceptions.

You might also like