Vocab Strategies
Vocab Strategies
Rojas
What We Need
to Know & Do
for English
Learners
Dakar 2011
Table of Contents
ALTERNATVE ASSIGNMENTS:
ESL Program Checklist 26
Spanish Science Lesson 32
Reading K-U-L-U-M 36
DVD n/a
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
2
What We Need to Know & Do
with a p
partner tryy to square
q the
terms (analogy)
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
3
#8 FIND THE MYTHS
switch roles
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
4
Know: MT & Bilingualism
L1 Competent
l
Developmentall
Variable
Monitoring
R fl t
Reflective
Holistic
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
5
Typology of Programs
English + primary language English-
English-language
n n
instruction n n exclusively
instruction y
Separate Early
Early--exit or transitional Newcomer programs
provision bilingual education ESL pull out taught
Late
Late--exit or developmental traditionally
bilingual education Content
Content--based ESL pull
One
One--way dual language or out
enrichment bilingual education Sheltered instruction
Heritage schools (ESLM,
(ESLM SIOP
SIOP, UBD for
ELL, ExC-
ExC-ELL, TELLiM,
TELLiM,
QTELL, WIDA)
Inclusive Two
Two--way dual language or Collaborative sheltered
provision bilingual education immersion
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
6
Know:
Proficiency
Text Types
Domaains & Registers maximum Narrative
Skills (O, R, W) Descriptive
Expository
Persuasion
P
Procedural
d l
Report
minimal Recount
‘high-
g -
high
ELL ‘responsive conditions’ Tools
Graphic Organizers
support
support’’
Vocabulary (EQUITY)
Reading Comprehension
Writing
Cooperative Learning
Differentiation
Co-
Co-Teaching
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
7
Elementary (Grades Pre
Pre--K- 1 )
Topic/ Assessments We can use … so students can…
Elementary (Grades 2
2--4 )
Topic/ Assessments We can use … so students can…
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
8
MS/ HS Language Arts
Topic/ Assessments We can use … so students can …
Standard: read, write, listen, & speak for
literary response and expression
(biographies)
MS/ HS Science
Topic/ Assessments We can use … so students can …
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
9
MS/ HS Social Studies
Topic/ Assessments We can use … so students can …
Standard:
Standard: historical thinking including
comprehension, analysis and interpretation,
research capabilities (current events/ global
issues)
MS/ HS Math
Topic/ Assessments We can use … so students can …
Statistics & Probability: collect, organize,
analyze & represent data
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
10
Jigsaw Team of 4
‘topic’
p and assessment task(s)
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
11
#32 Rotating Review
ONE PERSON is
selected to stay and
present
TEAMS rotate
r tat to
t vi
view
others’ work
Alternative Assignments
ESLSelf-Assessment
Checklist: How are we
doing?
Reading K-U-L-U-M
DVD
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
12
Revisiting the Myths
STATEMENT #1: Some international schools foster subtractive bilingualism while others promote additive
bilingualism.
STATEMENT #2: Younger children are more effective language learners than older learners.
STATEMENT #3: Acquiring an additional language is completely different than acquiring one’s first
language.
STATEMENT #4: EAL, Host Country Language, Mother Tongue and Modern Language curriculum planning
needs to be quite different.
STATEMENT #5: Most of the mistakes which second language learners make are due to interference from
their primary language.
STATEMENT #6: Important variables impacting upon the second language acquisition success of learners
include the following: the level and quality of proficiency one has in their primary language, language
aptitude, age, motivation, and how comfortable one feels in the immersion environment (e.g. acculturation
potential).
STATEMENT #7: It may take two years to attain a cognitively academic level of language proficiency; in
other words, two years for English learners to be totally peer-competitive with English-proficient students in
academic settings.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
13
STATEMENT #8: There are many ways that teachers can speed up students’ acquisition of an additional
language.
STATEMENT #9: The difference between immersion and submersion programs is that immersion program
teachers are trained to support second language acquirers not to ‘sink or swim’ through the use of specific
instructional support (i.e. scaffolding) strategies.
STATEMENT #10: English language learners would best be served in separate EAL programs until they are
proficient enough to be placed in rigorous academic programs.
STATEMENT #11: English language learners are underrepresented in gifted or honors programs and
overrepresented in special needs programs.
STATEMENT #12: One of the advantages of the IB Diploma is that it promotes bilingualism through its
various language offerings. Unfortunately, not all English-language schools offer the full range of language
offerings.
STATEMENT #13: When working with English language learners, it is important for teachers to
differentiate expectations or standards while students are acquiring the new language.
STATEMENT # 14: Differentiating or scaffolding for English language learners means designing
individualized lessons, depending on students’ primary languages, cultural/ academic backgrounds and English
language proficiency levels.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
14
STATEMENT #15: Even when English language learners are proficient or peer-competitive in English with
native-English students, it is necessary to use instructional strategies to support language development and
academic achievement.
STATEMENT #16: The use of students’ primary languages will hinder their success in English.
STATEMENT #17: English language learners should not be allowed to study another language when they are
trying to learn English since this will confuse them and slow down the acquisition of English.
STATEMENT #18: An effective program for preparing English language learners for mainstream classrooms
is the often-used pull-out, language-based model.
STATEMENT #19: EAL or sheltered instruction teachers can not meet all of the linguistic and academic
needs of English language learners by themselves.
STATEMENT #20: English language learners need to be grouped by similar language proficiency levels since
EAL teachers can not be expected to differentiate or scaffold for multilevel groups of students (as
classroom teachers might be expected to do).
STATEMENT #21: Classroom teachers should not assess or grade English language learners with the same
criteria (e.g. expectations) used for English-proficient students.
STATEMENT #22: The presence of too many English language learners lowers the standards of classrooms
and schools since using effective instructional strategies for them in mainstream classrooms slows down the
learning of the other students.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
15
STATEMENT #23: Students’ linguistic and academic development is delayed when they have to submit to
semesters of instruction which adapt or water down subject matter using simplistic linguistic discourse.
STATEMENT #24: Assessing English Language Learners suspected of having a learning disability or special
need can be done using the same procedures as those with native English students but should be conducted in
students’ primary languages as well.
STATEMENT #25: Teachers of English or academic content in English need to be native speakers of
English.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
16
Revisiting the Fibs
STATEMENT #1: Some international schools foster subtractive bilingualism while others promote additive bilingualism.
True.
MYTH #2: Younger children are more effective language learners than older learners.
Myth. Younger learners may be able to pronounce a new language with little or no accent and be able to perform
developmentally-appropriate tasks which help them to be more effective acquirers. Younger learners are also less
inhibited about the process of language learning and so often take more risks (e.g. another effective language acquisition
behavior). However, older students are actually more efficient or effective language learners since they are cognitively
mature in their own language. In other words, since they know the systems of their own language, many are able to
efficiently learn another language.
MYTH #3: Acquiring an additional language is completely different than acquiring one’s first language.
Myth. Acquiring a second language is somewhat different than acquiring a first language. There are many parallels
between acquiring a first and second language (i.e. errors are integral to the process, mastering the language takes about
five years, acquisition and success are influenced by socio-cultural and cognitive variables). The most significant
difference is that first language acquisition is more fixed while second language acquisition is more variable.
STATEMENT #4: EAL, Host Country Language, Mother Tongue and Modern Language curriculum planning
needs to be quite different.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
17
Myth. All curriculum plans consist of the following components: (1) identifying what we want students to know & do
(expectations), (2) identifying how we will know what they know & can do (assessment), (3) identifying the learning
experiences that will be used to enable the students to know and be able to do what we want (instruction).
MYTH #5: Most of the mistakes which second language learners make are due to interference from their primary
language.
Myth. Most of the pronunciation mistakes second language learners make might be considered as interference from the
primary language (i.e. an accent). Other kinds of mistakes, however, are more developmental in nature (i.e. morphological,
syntactical, and semantic). EAL and classroom teachers need to monitor students’ errors in order to keep track of their
second language development and, just as important, to provide strategic feedback to students as they progress along a
second language continuum of skills and expectations. Making mistakes is an essential part of the second language
acquisition process, and English language learners must feel free to approximate increasingly-complex structures. As
their proficiency increases, the number of errors decreases.
STATEMENT #6: Important variables impacting upon the second language acquisition success of learners include the
following: the level and quality of proficiency one has in their primary language, language aptitude, age, motivation,
and how comfortable one feels in the immersion environment (e.g. acculturation potential).
True.
MYTH #7: It may take two years to attain a cognitively academic level of language proficiency; in other words, two
years for English learners to be totally peer-competitive with English-proficient students in academic settings.
Myth. Collier (1979) and Cummins (1984) found that when students are schooled in two languages, they usually take from
4 to 7 years to reach norms on standardized achievement tests. Younger students with no schooling in their own language
may take as long as ten years to reach the norms. Calderon (2007) recently released research which found that it may
take up to five to seven years when the pacing of instruction is too relaxed and not challenging enough in EAL programs
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
18
and when mainstream classrooms are too difficult and there is no instructional scaffolding or support. These extreme
practices in schools imply the balancing act between rigor, relevancy, and sensitivity we need all teachers of English
language learners to achieve in their active teaching practices.
MYTH #8: There are many ways that teachers can speed up students’ acquisition of an additional language.
Myth. Research indicates that the rate of second language acquisition in an academic setting is not a function of teacher
impact. However, teachers do have an impact on students’ ultimate level of English proficiency attained (i.e. the
quality of language proficiency at the end of schooling). Ten years from now, students may come back to thank you for
teaching them English, but not for teaching them fast.
STATEMENT #9: The difference between immersion and submersion programs is that immersion program teachers are
trained to support second language acquirers not to ‘sink or swim’ through the use of specific instructional support (i.e.
scaffolding) strategies.
True.
MYTH #10: English language learners would best be served in separate EAL programs until they are proficient enough
to be placed in rigorous academic programs.
Myth. A traditional approach to servicing English language learners has been one whereby they were to learn enough
English to be able to enter mainstream classrooms (i.e. a sequential model of language acquisition and then academic
achievement). Since research showed that this approach led to students falling behind academically, a current approach
focuses on supporting English language learners to acquire language and achieve academically at the same time (i.e. a
simultaneous model).
STATEMENT #11: English language learners are underrepresented in gifted or honors programs and overrepresented
in special needs programs.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
19
True.
STATEMENT #12: One of the advantages of the IB Diploma is that it promotes bilingualism through its various
language offerings. Unfortunately, not all English-language schools offer the full range of offerings.
True.
MYTH #13: When working with English language learners, it is important for teachers to differentiate expectations or
standards while students are acquiring the new language.
Myth. It is important not to differentiate expectations or standards as then they are no longer standards. Traditionally,
it has been assumed that English language learning is remedial in nature (again based on the deficit model). When English
language learners are expected to meet the same standards, it is more akin to ‘immersion.’ Equity for English language
learners is best achieved through instruction to meet expectations and not through the lowering of the expectations.
MYTH # 14: Differentiating or scaffolding for English language learners means designing individualized lessons,
depending on students’ primary languages, cultural/ academic backgrounds and English language proficiency levels.
Myth. Differentiated or scaffolded instruction is not the same as individualized instruction. Effective curriculum for all
students consists of the following stages: (1) identifying or setting expectations (i.e. standards), (2) designing evidence
of the attainment of these expectations (i.e. assessment), (3) planning the learning experiences which will enable students
perform well on the assessments, and (4) planning the ways in which to support differentiated or scaffolded learning
experiences for diverse learners.
STATEMENT #15: Even when English language learners are proficient or peer-competitive in English with English-
native students, it is necessary to use instructional strategies to support language development and academic
achievement.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
20
True.
MYTH 16: The use of students’ primary languages will hinder their success in English.
Myth. A major problem facing English learners is often articulated as one of not knowing English, though in reality the
real problem may be what can only be labeled as an “obsession with speaking English” since the general perception is that
the more students use English, the faster they will acquire it. The way in which teachers and schools view students’
languages and language-usage patterns may have an even greater influence on their achievement. A shift in thinking is
necessary to move away from such a perspective: all teachers need to understand how languages are acquired, how to
develop an additive perspective concerning bilingualism, and how to consciously foster dual-language literacy.
International schools need to move beyond what may be a monolingual paralysis: the goal of second language acquisition in
international-school settings is the making of English-knowing balanced bilinguals – a concept inherently supported by the
IB program (not English monolinguals or ambi-bilinguals who are bilinguals that are perfect in both languages). The reality
is that English will most likely always be an additional of English language learners and not a ‘native language’ – just by
definition.
MYTH #17: English language learners should not be allowed to study another language when they are trying to learn
English since this will confuse them and slow down the acquisition of English.
Myth. This myth has its genesis in the perception that second language acquisition suffers from interference - a once
popular notion though now essentially dismissed in the research. Linguists and second language practitioners accept the
concept that bilingualism is enabling rather than disabling and, again, many would easily argue the same for trilingualism.
Continuing to conceive of sequential language acquisition as pedagogically sounder than simultaneous language acquisition
resonates of the deficit model of bilingualism. Unfortunately, it is difficult to convince those who hold onto monolingual
perceptions of language acquisition otherwise. Research on so called at-risk students’ potential success in studying
another world language indicates that they can indeed be successful. Keep in mind that many variables such as motivation,
feelings toward the target language and culture, and learning style also impact upon second language acquisition so a one-
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
21
to-one correspondence is far too simple a response (i.e. weak English proficiency = lack of success studying the host-
country language). The issue of being really proficient in additional languages as an advantage for all children needs to be
addressed. If so, then we must reflect again upon our notion of sequential language learning as a better approach than
simultaneous language acquisition - whether it is for the English language learner or the English-proficient student
learning another language.
MYTH #18: An effective program for preparing English language learners for mainstream classrooms is the often-
used pull-out, language-based model.
Myth. Neither traditional ESL pull-out programs (i.e. language-based curriculum) nor unprepared mainstream classes (i.e.
mainstream teachers with no training) are suitable instructional environments for English language learners, especially
when there is little to no articulation between the two. The questions of who owns English language learners, and why,
resonate in this context. ESL teachers feel a need to protect students from what they see as potential discomfort or
harm in mainstream classes. Classroom teachers feel mystified by students who do not share the language of the
classroom and are often ill-equipped to support English language learners’ academic achievement. The longer these
sensitivities endure, the longer schools delay implementing an inclusive model of responsibility, whereby all teachers own
English language learners alike.
STATEMENT #19: EAL or sheltered instruction teachers can not meet all of the linguistic and academic needs of
English language learners by themselves.
True.
MYTH #20: English language learners need to be grouped by similar language proficiency levels since ESL teachers
can not be expected to differentiate or scaffold for multilevel groups of students (as classroom teachers might be
expected to do).
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
22
Myth. TESOL standards for English language learners (see www.TESOL.org) underscore the implementation of content-
based EAL programs in order to provide English language learners immediate access to challenging, grade-level content
and create a vision of academic success by describing the language proficiencies needed to attain the same high-level
standards in content areas as English-proficient students. For this to happen, students need to be grouped and serviced
by their respective grade levels rather than traditional language-proficiency levels. EAL teachers need to utilize the
same kinds of instructional approaches for multilevel students as classroom teachers must; for example, differentiation,
cooperative learning, process and developmental literacy strategies, and performance assessments. Besides, language
acquisition is not linear, sequential or uniform so the concept of homogeneous language groups to facilitate language
development is lost (e.g. think of the difference between ‘foreign’ and second language models and goals).
MYTH #21: Classroom teachers should not assess or grade English language learners with the same criteria (e.g.
expectations) used for English-proficient students.
Myth. The use of standards-based performance assessments to gather evidence of what students know and can do along
with criteria given to students at the outset of instruction (e.g. rubrics) along with well-planned instructional scaffolds to
support students through the rubric should be the focal point of an equitable grading system. EAL and classroom
teachers can collaboratively use standards and evidence-based performance assessments to dismantle assumptions that
attribute lack of success to lack of English proficiency by focusing instead on the ongoing and unwavering preparation of
English language learners for academic success. The use of instructional scaffolding tools can support English language
learners to attain the same criteria as their English-background peers. Equity is provided through the instructional
process and not by lowering expectations.
MYTH #22: The presence of too many English language learners lowers the standards of classrooms and schools since
using effective instructional strategies for them in mainstream classrooms slows down the learning of the other
students.
Myth. This statement implies a perception that linguistic and cultural diversity is a deficit rather than a resource.
Schools which have a majority of English language learners and display exemplary reform efforts share the following
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
23
common characteristics: a school-wide vision of excellence that incorporates English language learners and creates a
community of learners engaged in active inquiry, programs which develop English proficiency and cultivate primary-
language skills, and a conscious effort to recruit and hire multilingual staff who are trained to support linguistically- and
culturally-diverse students. Fortunately, the criteria for providing responsive learning environments for English language
learners are similar to many of those for all students, including those for the gifted. Much of the academic literature
today speaks to teachers about the need to create inquiry-based and learning-centered environments. These include: the
articulation of what students should know and be able to do (i.e. standards or outcomes), the determination of acceptable
evidence for this knowledge and behavior (i.e. evidence-based assessment), the planning of learning experiences to develop
students’ conceptual understandings, the utilization of process literacy strategies (i.e. reading and writing processes,
open-ended and interpretational questioning techniques), and the use of instructional frameworks for diverse learners (i.e.
backwards design of learning experiences, differentiation, cooperative learning, collaboration between classroom and
learning-support teachers). Avoiding the twin sins of classrooms also contributes to an inquiry-based and learning-
centered environment; namely, the use of topics and activities in elementary school not grounded in standards or outcomes
and the issues of curriculum coverage and transmission of information in upper school.
STATEMENT #23: Students’ linguistic and academic development is delayed when they have to submit to semesters of
instruction which adapt or water down subject matter using simplistic linguistic discourse.
True.
STATEMENT #24: Assessing English Language Learners suspected of having a learning disability or special need can
be done using the same procedures as those with native English students as long as they are conducted in students’
primary languages as well.
True.
MYTH #25: Teachers of English or academic content in English need to be native speakers of English.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
24
Myth. It is not necessary to be a native speaker of a language, though one must be proficient. Similarly, it is not
necessary for ESL teachers to speak a language other than English though it can be very helpful! The globalization of
English cries out with the need to come to terms with the ‘internationalness’ of English. Exposure to and acceptance of a
variety of world Englishes is critical since that is the medium that most students will end up using in their futures.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
25
Reprinted From Strategies for Success with English Language Learners
Self-Assessment Checklist ©VPRojas, ASCD, 2007
Note: Checklist has three components: (1) program, (2) school-wide attributes, and (3) instructional conditions.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
26
6. We have an ecological program model for our ELL whereby EVERYONE
understands and embraces their roles and responsibilities as teachers of
ELL (evidence = a program whereby mainstream teachers are language
sensitive and ESL teachers are content based; a program which is focused
on long-term efforts and not short-term fix it solutions for a problem).
7. We do not perceive the need for a separate ESL program as a safe haven
for our ELL because all classrooms in our school are safe learning
environments for all our students (evidence = empathetic teachers and
peers; strive for excellence and equity resonates as mutual goals).
8. Our program allows English language learners’ access to grade-level
content while they are learning English as per the 2006 TESOL standards
for English language learners (evidence = ESL program model is content-
based and supports grade-level core academic subjects; delivery of one
curriculum to all students by classroom and ESL teachers collaboratively).
9. We use an assessment framework to collect data on language proficiency
and academic achievement (evidence: diagnostic, formative and
summative classroom-based assessments; standardized assessments
which are valid and reliable for our population).
10. We participate in ongoing staff development efforts in order to learn to
help all students learn and we reflectively ‘transfer’ our knowledge into
classroom practice (evidence = study groups; courses & workshops; small
scale investigations; peer coaching and mentoring; assessment teams).
Responsive School-Wide Practices Exceeds Meets Needs
Attention
1. We conceive of and implement literacy within a –reading-and-writing-to-
learn framework; reading and writing across the curriculum is a meta-goal
for acquiring and synthesizing information (evidence = all teachers use
language development strategies as a part of their disciplines; attention is
explicitly paid to genre studies as a part of content in all subject areas;
all classrooms use the reading and writing processes for learning).
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
27
2. We avoid the twin sins of schooling; that is, topics and activities in
elementary school and curriculum coverage and transmission of
information in upper school (evidence = concepts and purposeful
strategies in elementary school and depth of understanding and learning-
centered strategies in upper school).
3. We use a backwards planning curriculum model which identifies what we
want students to know and be able to (Stage I); how we will collect
evidence of what they know and can do (Stage II); and how we will plan
learning experiences and instructional strategies to facilitate their
attainment of the evidence (Stage III). We then build scaffolds to
support ELL as a part of this process (Stage IV). (evidence = UbD,
assessment-driven planning).
4. We conceive of assessment as informative; i.e. assessment for learning so
students can show ‘what they got’ though performance tasks; teachers
can assist learners to ‘get more’ since tasks are multi-step and require
coaching over time (evidence = formative and summative complex
assessment model).
5. We provide expectations to students before instruction and feedback
after instruction along with instructional strategies to enable their
progression (evidence = checklists; rating scales; analytic/ holistic/ task-
based rubrics).
6. Our classes emphasize problem-posing and solving through an inquiry
model of learning (evidence = use of inquiry-based essential questions
which are conceptual, overarching, open-ended, succinct, require
elaborated responses, and have an information gap or some tension;
identified complex assessment tasks as evidence of responses to these
questions).
7. Our classes are learning-centered meaning it is the students who are
doing the doing (evidence = gradual release of responsibility model of
learning which emphasizes that students do more than teachers to show
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
28
what they know and can do).
8. We hold high expectations for English Language Learners to use
generated language and do not stop with scripted language tasks
(evidence = NO ditto sheets; NO vocabulary or grammar skills practiced
out of context; lots of complex tasks integrating all four language skills).
9. We – mainstream and ESL teachers – collaborate in order to ensure that
all learning experiences of English language learners are scaffolded or
supported as necessary (evidence = co-planning; co-teaching; collaborated
assessments).
10. We practice three-way communication – among ELL parents, mainstream
teachers, and ESL teachers (evidence = newsletters; conferences;
meeting minutes; translators).
Responsive Instructional Strategies Exceeds Meets Needs
Attention
1. We develop language through content by focusing on linguistic features/
discourse markers of our disciplines (evidence = lessons with explicit
content and implicit linguistic form and function).
2. We plan instructional experiences and strategies only after we have
designed evidence-based assessments (evidence = backwards design
model of planning).
3. We use the benchmarks or performance indicators from our curriculum to
design our feedback tools, and we provide exemplars for learners to
follow (evidence = assessment tasks with checklists, rating scales, or
rubrics).
4. We use portfolios to collect evidence of what students know and do and
we conference with students to give them explicit strategies for
improving their performance (evidence = portfolios full of projects,
papers, checklists, rubrics, drafts, tapes, self-assessments).
5. We identify the content and language skills (benchmarks or performance
indicators) students are to master as a result of completing the
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
29
assessment tasks, and we are proficient at targeting instructional
strategies to the skills (evidence = lesson plans list content and language
skills matched or aligned with instructional strategies).
6. We utilize time-honored ESL scaffolds to make the content
comprehensible to our ELL (evidence = visuals; demonstrations;
paraphrasing; linguistic buddies; active hands-on materials; preview
vocabulary; comprehension checks; graphic organizers).
7. We consistently utilize five to ten research-based instructional
strategies to develop vocabulary which may be new for all students
(evidence = open word sorts; four dimensional word study; vocabulary
graphics; knowledge rating scales).
8. We consistently utilize five to ten research-based reading strategies to
develop the comprehension skills of all students so reading becomes a
tool for learning (evidence = Guided Reading; SSR; Collaborative Strategic
Reading; Math Notes; SQR3; DRTA; Pen-in-Hand; T-Notes; PORPE;
SPAWN; Proposition Support; an array of graphic organizers).
9. We consistently utilize research-based instructional strategies to develop
the writing skills of all students so writing becomes a tool for learning
(evidence = cubing; 4-2-1 drafting; Hennings Sequence; exemplars;
divorcing the draft; unsettling; writer’s workshop).
10. We utilize the instructional framework scaffold of cooperative learning
to increase verbal interaction in our classes and to extend the classroom
discourse beyond ‘teacher asks question/ students respond one at a time’
(evidence = students working together in structured groups so that they
are talking to learn and are not passive recipients of teacher talk).
11. We utilize the instructional framework scaffold of differentiation in
order to provide multiple paths to learning for our diverse students
(evidence = differentiation of material through jigsaw or literature
circles; differentiation of tasks through tiered activities or learning
menus; differentiation of instructional strategies through centers or
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
30
curriculum compacting; differentiation of classroom configuration
through flexible student groupings).
12. We utilize the instructional framework scaffold of co-teaching with our
ESL teachers in order to provide ELL’ access to mainstream learning
experiences (evidence = parallel teaching; alternative teaching; station
teaching; team teaching).
13. We consistently work with and listen to students in small groups whether
it be with a group which needs support or with a group which needs to be
extended (evidence = co-teaching; conferencing records).
14. We use multiple sources of information and materials including technology
(evidence = textbook is only one resource for learning; also use
instructional software, internet investigations, SMART Boards).
15. We develop students’ metalinguistic awareness focusing on English- and
primary-language usage patterns and on language development strategies
to assist our ELL with their language acquisition (evidence = self-
regulating tasks; self-assessments; learning strategies checklists). We do
not have punitive language-usage policies in our classrooms, no matter how
well-intended they may be.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
31
GENÉTICA
La Forma
de la Cara Redonda Redonda Cuadrada
(RR) (Rr) (rr)
Hoyuelo en
La Barbilla No tiene No tiene Tiene
(CC) (Cc) (cc)
Pelo
Rízos Ondulado Lacio
(HH) (Hh) (hh)
El Punto
De Viuda Tiene
Tiene No tiene
(WW) (Ww) (ww)
La Distancia
Entre Los Ojos
Pegados Normales Separados
(EE) (Ee) (ee)
La Forma de
Los Ojos Almendra Almendra Redonda
(AA) (Aa) (aa)
La Posición
De Los Ojos Derechos Derechos Achinoados
(SS) (Ss) (ss)
El Tamaño de
Los Ojos Grandes Medianos Pequeños
(LL) (Ll) (ll)
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
32
Dominante Hibrido Sumisa
Características
(Dos Caras) (Una Cara, una cruz) (Dos Cruzes)
El Largo de
largas largas cortas
Las Pestañas
(LL) (Ll) (ll)
La Forma de
Las Cejas tupidas tupidas ralas
(BB) (Bb) (bb)
La Posición de
Las Cejas separadas separadas juntas
(CC) (Cc) (cc)
El Tamaño de
La Naríz
grande mediana pequeña
(LL) (Ll) (ll)
La Forma de
Los Labios normales finos
gruesos
(TT) (Tt) (tt)
El Tamaño de
Las Orejas pequeñas
grandes medianas
(LL) (Ll) (ll)
El Tamaño de
La Boca grande mediana pequeña
(LL) (Ll) (ll)
Pecas
tiene tiene no tiene
(FF) (Ff) (ff)
Hoyuelos
tiene tiene no tiene
(DD) (Dd) (dd)
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
33
OBSERVACIONES
EL SEXO ___________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
34
DIARIO DE APRENDIZ
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
35
K-W-L-U-M
Topic _____________________________ Name ___________________ Date _________
36
37
Differentiation Tools
Preview Concepts
‘?’ if y
you have no idea
d what the
concept refers to
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
38
Differentiation Framework
Material Task Strategy Configuration
(content) (student product) (learning experiences) (student groupings)
Multiple materials Product options to Varied strategies with meta- Opportunities to work
(i.e. leveled, MT,) respond to varied cognitive reflections (e.g. alone, in pairs, or in small
interests or learning vocabulary, reading, writing) groups
Books on tape
profiles
Highlighted or Varied journal prompts
Varied performance
rebus text Choice of roles when in
assessments (e.g. menus, Choice of review tools and small groups
Varied topics for TIC TAC TOE, RAFT) homework options
research
Varied choices or roles
Independent in performance Supportive technology Literature Circle roles
research options assessments
Amount or kind d of support
pp
Interest centers Varied
V d ttimelines
l or available (e.g. centers) Jigsaw groups
check--in points
check
Optional
minilessons Some choice of Various types of graphic
questions on tests & organizers & supporting
Compacting documents (e.g. reading/
quizzes
Online extension listening guides, academic
activities sentence frames)
Mentors
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
39
Differentiation Checklist
Edit
Editorial
i l
Brochure
Tribute
Children’s book
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
40
#7 Find Someone Who
can provide you with
one response
can use yourself
once
can use the trainer
once
first ones done win
prizes
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
41
Differentiated Instruction for ELL Preview/ Review
Place a “T” if you can teach the dichotomy to someone else, an “H” if you
have heard of the dichotomy, and a question mark “?” next to dichotomies
you are unsure of. Then, find someone who can help you clarify the "?."
Draft a sentence about one of these dichotomies showing how you support
ELL:
____________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
42
TIC-TAC-TOE
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
43
DISCUSSION & DESIGN EVIDENCE:
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
44
DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES
Alternative Assignments These can include various ways for students to
represent their understanding of a text they have
read. Students might represent the main idea or
message in the form of a drawing, a dramatic
representation, or a written analysis. These can be
assigned by the teacher or self-selected by the
student.
Anchor Activities These are tasks to which students automatically
move as soon as they complete an assignment. They
are a good way to help students cultivate the habit of
using time wisely and with a clear purpose and should
not be conceived of as busywork.
Agendas A personalized list of tasks that a particular student
must complete in a specified time. They usually take
a student two to three weeks to complete, and a
designated time of the day or period is set aside for
this purpose. While students are working, teachers
can move about to coach and monitor progress.
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant [email protected] (732) 940-1860
45
DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES
Complex Instruction A collaborative instructional strategy which has
students work together in heterogeneous groups to
complete tasks that genuinely draw upon the skills of
each of them in order to ensure that each student is
indispensable to the work of the group as a whole.
The tasks should be open ended, interesting,
accomplishable in more than one way, challenging, &
use a variety of expressive modalities (e.g. oral,
reading & writing, media). The tasks should not be
exclusively dependent on decoding, encoding,
computation or memorization.
Entry Points This has been described as a strategy for addressing
varied intelligence profiles. Students explore a given
topic through as many as five avenues; for example,
narrational, logical-quantitative, foundational,
aesthetic, or experiential.
4MAT Based on several personality and learning inventories,
this approach hypothesizes that students have one of
four learning preferences. Teachers plan instruction
for each of the four preferences during the course
of several days on a given topic. Thus, some lessons
focus on mastery, some on understanding, some on
personal involvement and some on synthesis. All
students take part in all approaches based on the
belief that each learner has a chance to approach the
topic through preferred modes and also to
strengthen weaker modes.
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant [email protected] (732) 940-1860
46
DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES
Homework Many teachers begin differentiating assignments
by creating more than one option for students.
For example, students may respond to different
questions or may read different books.
Independent Studies This offers a tailor-made opportunity to help
students develop talent and interest areas.
Teachers systematically aid students in developing
curiosity, pursuing topics that interest them,
identifying intriguing questions, developing plans to
find out more about those questions, managing
time, setting goals and criteria for work, assessing
progress, and presenting new understandings.
Jigsaw Activities This is a popular cooperative learning strategy that
divides the material to be studied into sections
and makes individuals or groups responsible for
learning and then teaching their section to the
other students.
Learning Menus or Contracts These are designed to give learners choices of
tasks while still ensuring that each learner focuses
on knowledge and skills designated as essential.
Typically, they will include a ‘main course’ which
students are required to complete in its entirety;
‘side dishes’ from which students must select a
designated number of options; and ‘desserts’ which
are optional extension or enrichment tasks. For
older learners, the terms ‘imperatives,’
‘negotiables’, and ‘options’ might be used in the
form of a contract.
Literature Circles Students may be assigned to read different texts
connected by theme or genre or to select a text
from possible titles. Then students can
participate in discussion groups or produce an
artifact such as a report or speech.
Multiple Texts & Using multiple texts and combining them with a
wide variety of supplementary materials increases
Resource Material
teachers’ chances for reaching all students.
Teachers can develop valuable differentiation
resources by building a classroom library of varied-
level texts, magazines, newsletters, brochures, and
other print materials. Additionally, there is a rich
array of materials available through the Internet,
computer programs, audio and video materials, etc.
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant [email protected] (732) 940-1860
47
DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES
Orbitals These are independent investigations revolving
around some facet of the curriculum and lasting
from three to six weeks. Students select their
own topics and are guided by their teacher to
develop more expertise on the topic and on the
process of becoming an independent investigator.
48
DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES
Socratic Seminar This is a discussion strategy that emphasizes
thoughtful dialogue among the students without
teacher intervention. In one model, all students sit
in a circle and participate in an open-ended
discussion based on teacher- or student-generated
questions. Or students can sit in two concentric
circles with the inner circle discussing and the
outer circle listening (then they switch roles).
TIC TAC TOE This seems like a positive way to present a variety
of assignments. The assignments on the board can
be arranged by rows representing degree of
difficulty or learning preferences. A variation is
to use the board for extension activities for
students who have demonstrated the capacity to
go beyond the core class assignments. Another
variation is to have students complete three
assignments, not necessarily in a row.
Tiered Activities An instructional approach designed to have
students of differing skill levels work with
essential knowledge, understanding, and skill – but
to do so at levels of difficulty appropriately
challenging for them as individuals at a given point
in the instructional cycle. Begin by developing one
challenging activity squarely focused on the stated
outcomes; then develop two to four different
versions of the task to challenge the range of
learners.
Web Quests These are inquiry-based activities designed by
teachers to help students negotiate the Internet
for a teacher-assigned or student-selected topic.
When creating these, the teacher pre-determines
links that are connected to the topic. They
support differentiated instruction because they
can be based on student readiness and interest and
can be conducted as a group or individual inquiry.
Writing Workshop Students work at their own pace at the various
stages of the writing process. They may be
working individually, in pairs, in small groups, or in
conferences with the teacher.
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant [email protected] (732) 940-1860
49
Understanding by Design + Differentiating Instruction
Sources: From Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design by Carol Ann Tomlinson
and Jay McTighe, 2006, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Instructional Principles:
1. Provides supported reading for students who have difficulty with text
material (e.g. reading buddies, taped portions of text, highlighted texts,
graphic organizers for distilling text, double entry journals, etc).
10. Models reading strategies and then provides mini-lessons as a follow up.
11. Forms flexible and fluid instructional groups based on ongoing or formative
assessment data.
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
50
13. Invites students to propose alternative ways of accomplishing goals.
14. Uses ‘heads up’ oral reminders to the class to call student attention to
potential trouble spots in their tasks and responses.
15. Uses regular ‘teacher talk’ groups as one assessment strategy to gather
information about students’ progress.
16. Offers periodic mini-workshops on skills or topics with which students may
experience difficulty or on skills or topics designed to push forward the
thinking and production of advanced learners.
17. Offers students the option of working alone or with a partner when feasible.
18. Uses rubrics with elements and criteria focused on key content goals as well
as personalized elements designed to appropriate challenge various learners
and cause them to attend to particular facets of the work important to their
own development.
19. Tiers activities when appropriate so that all students are working toward the
same goals but at varying levels of difficulty.
1. Gives quizzes orally and provides more time for quizzes for students who
need these options.
2. Allows use of the primary language as needed so students can show what
they know.
51
throughout assessment work.
7. Uses rubrics with elements and criteria focused on key content goals as well
as personalized elements designed to appropriate challenge various learners
and cause them to attend to particular facets of the work important to their
own development.
10. Continues to use regular ‘teacher talk’ groups as a means of gathering data
and assisting students with assessment work.
11. Bases grades on clearly specified learning goals and performance standards.
12. Uses valid evidence for grading; that is, bases grades on criteria and not
norms (criterion-referenced vs. norm referenced).
15. Focuses on achievement only and reports other factor separately (e.g. class
participation, attendance, behavior, attitude).
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
52
What we already do:
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
53
Sample RAFT Assignments
2nd Grade Language Arts RAFT Assignment: The Very Hungry Caterpillar
developed by staff at the Columbus School in Medellin, Colombia
ROLE AUDIENCE FORMAT TOPIC
You Teacher Event Chain Retell the story
Nutritionist Caterpillar Menu A healthier diet
Butterfly Plant Venn Diagram Our life cycles
Caterpillar Caterpillar Diary Entry How I felt on
Saturday
You Eric Carle Letter Why I like the
book
Eric Carle Us Sequel What happens next
Script writers Students Puppet show script Retell the story
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
54
Sample RAFT Assignments
Sample RAFT for the Topic of Planets
Jupiter, Saturn & Neptune, Pluto, & Illustration What we got that
Uranus beyond you don’t
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
55
Sample RAFT Assignments
6th Grade Science Assignment: Forces
Developed by Byron Adams, 6th grade teacher,
City View Community School, Minneapolis, MN
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
56
Sample RAFT Assignments
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
57
Sample RAFT Assignments
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
58
Sample RAFT Assignments
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
59
Sample RAFT Assignments
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
60
Sample RAFT Assignments
Role Audience Format Topic
61
Can describe a
Can describe a Can describe a Uses jigsaw
strategy to use for Can describe a RAFT
mind map reading strategy regularly
writing
Can define formative Can identify two
Can recall a myth Can scaffold for Can recall one
vs. summative cooperative learning
ESL Levels checklist criteria
assessment strategies
Can distinguish
Can describe how to Free Can identify two
Can identify two
implement one building vocabulary
BICS vs. CALP
background strategy Space strategies
graphic organizers
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
62
Vocabulary Tools for English Learners
SORT vocabulary
words from your
example into Tier I, II,
or III
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
63
Jigsaw Tools
JIGSAW vocabulary
tools among team
members
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
64
Mentor Vocabulary Plans
Review vocabulary
plans
Formula:
20%-60%-20%
____________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
65
Tiers Overview
These are the most basic words and expressions
and do not need to be taught except to English
TIER I learners. Examples are: car, water, man,
answer, make up your mind, once upon a time.
In ESL, we refer to these words and phrases as
BICS (basic interpersonal communication skills).
______________________
Sources: Calderón, M. (2007). Teaching Reading to English Language Learners, Grades 6-12: A
Framework for Improving Achievement in the Content Areas, Corwin Press.
Colombo, M. & Furbash, D. (2010. Teaching English Language Learners: Content and Language in
Middle and Secondary Schools, Sage Publications.
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Specialist (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
66
Math Tier I Tier II Tier III
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Specialist (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
67
Science
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Specialist (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
68
Literature Tier I Tier II Tier III
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Specialist (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
69
History
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Specialist (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
70
Music or Art
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Specialist (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
71
Technology
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Specialist (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
72
Physical Education
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Specialist (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
73
Expert Jigsaw
DIRECTIONS
Each expert team is responsible for learning the vocabulary strategies assigned in the right-
hand column. The following page is for note (i.e. t what tier, what stage, & an example for
classroom application).
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
74
Expert Jigsaw
Strategy:
Strategy:
Strategy:
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
75
Expert Jigsaw
Strategy:
Strategy:
__________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
76
Content Area
PRACTICE: Now students are ‘ready’ to read text which is too difficult for them.
Several reading strategies that can be used are the following: anticipation guides
coding, collaborative strategic reading, concept collection, group summarizing
interactive reading guide, KNWS, learning logs, Question Menu , or T-Notes.
77
GRADE 6 RAFT ASSIGNMENT FOR PHYSICAL SCIENCE
Role Audience Format Topic
A Floating
Picture book Potato
6th grade nd
2 grade students with beginning,
Scientists
middle and end
Alka seltzer
Na2CO3
How you have
Epson Salt (Sodium Carbonate) Email
changed me!
Why we are
Baking Soda Vinegar Cartoon
BFF’s.
78
RAFT ASSIGNMENT FOR MAUS: A SURVIVOR'S TALE
(Humanities)
Role Audience Format Topic
79
GRADE 7 MATH RAFT ASSIGNMENT
80
Grade & Topic:
EXPOSURE (20%):
PRACTICE (60%):
MASTERY (20%):
ASSESSMENT:
81
© 1 9 9 8 K a g a n ’ s C o o p e r a t i v e L e a r n i n g S t r u c t u r e s
1. Agreement Circles 9. Flashcard Game 17. Match Mine 23. Pairs Check
Students stand in a large circle, then step to the Flashcards in pairs, with rounds, progressing Receivers arrange objects to match those of Students work first in pairs each doing a
center in proportion to their agreement with a from many to no clues. Senders whose objects are hidden by a barrier. problem and receiving coaching and praise from
statement by a student or teacher. Draw-What-I-Say: Receiver draws what their partner: then pairs check and celebrate
10. Formations sender describes after every two problems.
2. Blind Sequencing Students stand together as a class to form Build-What-I-Write: Receiver constructs
Students sequence all pieces without peeking at shapes. what Sender has described in writing. 24. Pairs Compare
the pieces of teammates. Pairs generate ideas or answers, compare their
11. Four S Brainstorming 18. Mix-Freeze-Group answers with another pair, and then see if
3. Circle-the-Sage Sultan of Silly, Synergy Guru, Sergeant Support, Students rush to form groups of a specific size, working together they can come up with
Students who know, stand to become sages; and the Speed Captain play their roles as they hoping not to land in "Lost and Found." additional responses neither pair alone had.
teammates each gather around a different sage quickly generate many ideas which are recorded
to learn. Students return to teams to compare by Synergy Guru. 19. Mix-Pair-Discuss 25. Paraphrase Passport
notes. ThinkPad Brainstorming: No roles. Students Students pair with classmate, to discuss Students can share their own ideas only after
generate items on thinkpad slips, announcing question posed by the teacher they accurately paraphrase the person who
4. Corners them to teammates and placing them in the spoke before them.
Students pick a corner, write its number, go center of the table. 20. Mix-N-Match
there, and interact with others with same 26. Partners
Students mix, then find partners with the
corner choice in a Rally Robin or Timed Pair 12. Idea Spinner Pairs work to prepare a presentation, then
matching card.
Share. Spin Captain “Shares an Idea" or "Quizzes a Pal" present to the other pair in their team.
Snowball: Students toss crumpled papers
to Summarize, Evaluate, Explain, or Predict.
over imaginary volleyball net, stop, pick up a
5. Fan-N-Pick 27. Poems for Two Voices
snowball, then find the person with the
Played with higher level thinking Q cards. #1 13. Inside/Outside Circle Partners alternate reading "A” and "B" lines of a
matching “snowball.”
fans; 2 picks; #3 answers. #4 praises. Students Students in concentric circles rotate to face a poem, and read "AB" lines together in unison.
then rotate roles. partner to answer the teacher’s questions or Songs for Two Voices: Partners alternate
21. Numbered Heads Together
those of the partner. singing "A" and "B" lines of a song, and sing
6. Find My Rule Students huddle to make sure all can respond, a
"AB" lines together in unison.
The teacher places items in a frame (two boxes, 14. Jigsaw Problem Solving number is called, the student with the number
Venn, on a line); Students induce the rule. Each teammate has part of the answer or a clue responds. 28. Q-Spinner
Two Box Introduction card; teammates must put their info together to Paired Heads Together: Students in pairs Students generate questions from one of 36
What’s My Line solve the team problem. huddle to make sure they both can respond, question prompts produced by spinners.
Crack My Venn an "A" or "B" is called, the student with that
15. Line Ups letter responds. 29. RallyRobin
7. Find Someone Who Students line up by characteristics, estimates, Traveling Heads Together: Students in Students in pairs take turns talking.
Students circulate, finding others who can values, or assigned items. Numbered Heads travel to new teams to RallyToss: Partners toss a ball (paper wad)
contribute to their worksheet. Value Lines: Student, line up as they agree or share response. while doing RallyRobin.
People Hunt: Students circulate, finding disagree with a value statement.
others who match their own characteristics Folded & Split Line Ups: Students fold the 30. RallyTable
22. One Stray
Fact Bingo: Find Someone Who played on Line Up or Split and Slide it to interact with Students in pairs take turns writing, drawing,
The teacher calls a number: students with that
bingo worksheet someone with a different point of view, pasting, (2 erasers, 2 pencils per team)
number "stray" to join another team, often to
characteristic or estimate. Pass-N-Praise: Students in pairs take turns
share.
8. Find the Fib writing and hand their paper to the next
Two Stray: Two students stray to another
Teammates try to determine which of three 16. Lyrical Lessons person only after receiving praise.
team, often to share and to listen.
statements is a fib. Students write and/or sing songs based on Three Stray: Three students stray to
Fact or Fiction: Teammates try to determine curriculum, often to familiar tunes. another team, often to listen to the one who
if a statement is true or false.
stayed to explain a team project.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
82
31. ReadingBoards 38. Showdown 44. Team Chants 51. Telephone
Students manipulate game pieces relating to the Teammates each write an answer, then there is a Teammates come up with words and phrases One student leaves the room. The teacher
song as they sing along. "showdown" as they show their answers to each related to the content, then come up with a teaches the remaining students. The absent
other. Teammates verify answers. rhythmic chant often with snapping, stomping, student returns and is taught by teammates.
32. Rotating Review tapping, and clapping.
Teams discuss topic, chart their thoughts, 39. Similarity Groups 52. Think-Pair-Share
rotate to the next chart to discuss and chart Students form groups based on a commonality. 45. Team Interview Students think about their response to a
their thoughts. Students are interviewed, each in turn, by their question, discuss answers in pairs, and share
Rotating Feedback: Teams discuss, then 40. Spend-A-Buck teammates. their own or partner’s answer with the class.
chart their feedback to another team's Each student has four quarters to spend on two, Think-Pair-Square: Same except students
product: then rotate to do the same with the three, or four items. The item with the most 46. Teammates Consult share their answers with teammates rather
next team. quarters is the team choice. Fur each of a series of questions, students than with the class.
place pens in a cup, share and discuss their
33. RoundRobin 41. Spin-N-Think answers, and then pick up pens to write answer 53. Three-Pair-Share
Students in teams take turn talking. Students follow a thinking trail (Read Q. Answer in own words. Students share on a topic three times, once with
Turn Toss: Students toss a ball (paper wad) Q. Paraphrase & Praise, & Discuss). At each point each teammate.
while doing RoundRobin. on the trail a student is randomly selected to 47. Team-Pair-Solo
Think-Write-RoundRobin: Students think, perform after all students have had think time. Students solve problems first as a team, then as 54. Three-Step Interview
then write before the RoundRobin. Spin-N-Review: Students review questions a pair, finally alone. Students share with a partner, the partner
by following trail (Read Q, Answer Q, shares with them, and then they RoundRobin
34. Roundtable Check Answer, Praise or Help). 48. Team Stand-N-Share share their partner's response with the other
Students in teams take turns writing, drawing, All teams stand. Teams share ideas and record teammates.
pasting, (1 paper, 1 pencil per team) 42. Stir-the-Class ideas from other teams. Teams sit when all ideas
Rotating Recorder: Students take turns Teams stand in circle around room, huddle to are shared and continue to record until all teams 55. Timed Pair Share
recording team responses. discuss a question from the teacher, stand sit. Students share with a partner for a
Simultaneous Roundtable: RoundTable with shoulder to shoulder when they have their predetermined amount of time and then the
more than one recording sheet passed at answers, rotate to next team when their number 49. Team Statements partner shares with them for the same amount
once. (4 papers, 4 pencils per team) is called to share their answer, and join the new Students think, discuss in pairs, write an of time.
team for next question. individual statement, RoundRobin individual
35. Sages Share statements, and then work together to arrive at 56. Who Am I?
Students ThinkPad Brainstorm ideas, and each 43. Talking Chips team statement they all endorse more strongly Students attempt to determine their secret
initial those ideas they can explain, then Students place their chip in the center each than their individual statements. identity (taped on their back) by circulating
students take turns interviewing the "sages"- time they talk; they cannot speak gain until all asking “yes-no" questions of classmates. They
those who can explain an idea they don't chips are in the center and collected. 50. Team Word-Web are allowed three questions per classmate (or
understand. Gambit Chips: like Talking Chips but chips Students write the topic in the center, Round unlimited questions until they receive a no
contain gambits (things to say or do): For Table core concepts then free-for-all supporting response). They then find a new classmate to
36. Same-Different examples, Affirmation Chips contain elements, and bridges. Students each use a question. When the student guesses his/her
Students try to discover what is the same and praisers: Paraphrase Chips contain gambits different color pen or marker for individual identity, he/she becomes a consultant to give
different in two pictures, but neither student for paraphrasing. accountability and to ensure equal participation. clues to those who have not yet found their
can look at the picture of the other. Response Mode Chips: Like Talking Chips but Team Mind Map: Students draw and label identity.
chips contain response modes: For examples, the central image, brainstorm, draw and label
37. Send-A-Problem Summarizing, Giving an Idea, Praising an Idea main ideas radiating out of the central
Teammates make problems which are sent image, and finally add details using colors,
around the class for other teams to solve. images, branches and key words.
Trade-A-Problem: Teammates make problems
which are traded with another learn to solve.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA P. ROJAS Language Education Consultant (732) 940-1860 [email protected]
83
Vocabulary Strategies
Vocabulary
Strategies
Example: Analogies
Analogies
Congress and a principal both set rules Congress has more members and rules
and regulations. and regulations.
Both organizations need to work together Congress has nationwide goals.
to achieve goals.
Neither has complete power regarding Congress has a Senate and president; a
issues. principal has a superintendent and a
school board
Both organizations represent other Congress rules the nation; principals rule
groups of people. the school community.
Both have processes for achieving goals. Congress votes; principals make rulings
based on input from others.
Determined Inventive
Realizes he can create
Insightful fire from the sparks
of his hatchet
Brian
Perceptive In
Hatchet
Connects tracks on
sand to turtle eggs, Defeated
connects water Let fire go out, didn’t
refraction to eat, and wanted to die
spearing fish when a plane didn’t see
him
Clever
Concept Definition Mapping - (Billmeyer & Barton, 1998) - This strategy teaches students the
meaning of key concepts by helping them understand the essential attributes, qualities, or
characteristics of a word's meaning. Procedure: (a) use an overhead to display an example of a
concept definition map (b) select a term and have students brainstorm information for such a map,
(c) have students work in pairs to complete a map with a term you have chosen from the unit, and
(d) instruct students to write a complete definition, using the information from their maps. See
examples below.
What is It?
What is it like?
Mathematical Shape
Closed
Plane Figure
Two-dimensional
Made of line
segments
Pentagon Hexagon Rhombus
What are some examples?
climate
Properties
What is it like?
rain
less than 25 cm.
of rainfall
desert
no cloud cover;
winds dry land
Sahara
Illustrations
What are some examples?
Contextual Redefinition - (Readence, Moore, & Rickelman, 2001) - It is essential that readers are
able to use context clues to derive meaning; this strategy provides a format for students to realize
this importance. Procedure: (a) select unfamiliar words from the text that are central to
comprehending important concepts, (b) write a sentence for each word onto a transparency, (c) ask
groups of students to provide a meaning for each word and to defend their guess, (d) then present
the words in the original text, and (e) students consult a dictionary for verification. In essence,
appropriate reading behavior is being modeled for the class.
Find Someone Who - (Kagan, 1992) - This is an interactive strategy to help students practice new
vocabulary. Procedure: (a) prepare a Find Someone Who ... form that looks similar to a bingo card,
(b) in each space put a new vocabulary word, (c) give one form to each student and give the class
about ten minutes to roam and get definitions (i.e. the name of the student and what he or she gives
as the meaning of the word or concept), and (d) the student who gets most of the spaces filled
without using anyone twice 'wins.' Translations into the mother tongue are acceptable.
Four-Dimensional Study - (Stejnost & Thiese, 2001) - This strategy encourages students to learn
vocabulary from different approaches: context clues, dictionary definitions, application, and visual.
Procedure: (a) choose 5 to 10 words that are unfamiliar, (b) instruct students to do the following on
an index card - copy a sentence from the text that uses the word, write the dictionary meaning,
write a personal knowledge or experience, and draw a picture. See example below.
Four-Dimensional Study
This lawsuit is not about banning a product,
but about banning a fraud.
My favorite
2. From the dictionary.
baseball player,
To forbid or to
3. From my life.
(square 1) (square 2)
(square 3) (square 4)
Frayer Model - (Billmeyer & Barton, 1998) - This is a word categorization strategy which provides
students with different ways to think about the meaning of word concepts and develop
understanding of content area reading vocabulary. Students form hierarchical word relationships by
listing essentials, examples, non-essentials, and non-examples of a particular word (i.e. knowing what
a concept isn't can help define what it is). Procedure: (a) assign concepts to groups, (b) explain the
attributes of the Frayer model, (c) complete one with the class, (d) have students work in pairs to
complete their concepts, and (f) have students share and then display their boards so the concepts
can be continuously during the unit of study. See the example on the following page.
Knowledge Rating - (Stejnost & Thiese, 2001) - Procedure: (a) distribute a list of words appropriate
to the topic, (b) ask students to respond individually to each category by placing an 'x' in the boxes,
(c) have students share their responses in small groups, and (d) have a whole class discussion to
foster prior knowledge about the topic. See examples below.
diffusion X
permeable X
glucose X X X
dialysis X X X X X
endocytosis X
phagocytosis X
impermeable X
osmosis X X X X X
'
oligarchy X
anarchy X X X X X
democracy X X
communism X X
socialism X
impeachment X X
monarchy X X
banishment X
Magnet Summaries - (Buehl, 2001) - This strategy involves the identification of key words - magnet
words from a reading- that students then use to organize information into a summary (prewriting).
Procedure: (a) have students read a short portion of text, looking for key terms to which the
details in the passage seem to connect, (b) on a transparency model writing details from the
passage that are connected to the magnet word, (c) distribute index cards for recording magnet
words while students read the rest of the passage (tell younger students they should identify a
magnet word for each paragraph or heading), (d) in groups have students share their words and
decide on the best magnet words and generate the details, (e) model for students how the
information can be organized into a sentence, (f) have students construct sentences for their
remaining cards (on scratch paper first and then on the back of the cards), and (g) direct students
to arrange the cards in the order they want their summary to read. See example on following page.
no trees
far from "Homes on the Prairie were sod
loneliness each other houses, called 'soddies, ' because
they had no trees. People were lonely
Homes on the Prairie because the houses were far from
each other."
dirt floors
sod houses “soddies”
Missing Words - (Stephens & Brown, 2000) - Missing words - an adaptation of the cloze procedure -
engages students in reading a selection with certain words deleted, and then predicting in writing
the missing words. It helps students learn to draw upon prior knowledge, use meta-cognitive skills,
think inferentially, and understand relationships. Procedure: (a) the teacher selects a passage that
the students haven't read and deletes certain words - leaving the beginning and ending sentences
intact- (the deleted words may be key vocabulary words, certain parts of speech, or based on a
numerical pattern like every seventh word), (b) the teacher also models - using a different passage
- how to skim a passage for an overview and how to read the material looking for clues, (c) the
teacher uses a think-aloud to model the meta-cognitive process of rereading the passage -
monitoring the word choices and their effect upon the meaning of the passage.
Open Word Sort - (Cloud, Genesee, & Hamayan, 2000) - A strategy for before, during or after
reading text. Procedure: (a) Student pairs are given words written on individual strips of paper, (b)
they collaborate to categorize the words by identifying and explaining relationships among them, (c)
students then read and reorganize the words in a way that would be effective for teaching key
Semantic Feature Analysis – (Johnson & Pearson, 1978) - This develops vocabulary concepts and
categorization skills when students find similarities and differences in related words. Procedure: (a)
write a category above a matrix, (b) list words or examples in the category vertically in the matrix,
(c) write features horizontally on the matrix, and (d) have students study each feature and write a
'+' if the word contains the feature and a '-' if the word does not. The strategy helps students
form broader vocabulary concepts and review information by comparing and contrasting words in
the same category. See example below.
DINOSAURS
Tyrannosaur -- -- + + -- + --
Coelophysis + -- -- + -- -- +
Bronotosauris -- + -- -- + + --
Trodan -- -- + + -- -- +
Duckbills -- -- + + -- + --
Prosauropods + -- -- -- + + --
Alosaurus -- + -- + -- + --
Semantic Gradient Scales - (Blachowicz & Fisher, 1996) - This scale helps students to see how new
words fit into a patterns of known words. Procedure: (a) establish a semantic gradient scale (see
example), (b) have the students develop words that fit between the two poles (e.g. developing words
between courageous and cowardly might coordinate with a literature lesson while a freedom list
might fit with a social studies unit).
10 Most Important Words - (Stephens & Brown, 2000) - This is designed to help students become
aware of the value of key concepts in developing content knowledge. It can be used as a 'pre' or
'post' unit activity. Procedure: (a) the teacher introduces a topic by helping students think about
what they already know, (b) students are then asked to predict in pairs what they think the ten
most important words of the unit will be, (c) then pairs share their lists with another pair - and
they agree to a final list of ten, (d) the lists are continually referred to, revised and at the end of
the unit the class reflects on which ten were the most important after all.
Tri-bond – (Chen, L. & Mira-Flores, E., 2006) – Create a set of word cards that contain three words
on one side and the larger concept they fit within on the other side. Have students work in
partners: one reads out the front of the card and the other has to try out the concept. Example:
(front) (back)
Jupiter
Mercury Planets
Mars
Verb Walls:Understanding and using verbs helps students to grasp the actions of a
discipline. Teachers can create a verb wall by posting the 50-verb list of their
subject area onto the wall. Teachers refer to specific verbs as they present
concepts (i.e. exposure) and students use the verb wall for writing tasks in the
specific subject areas to explain or describe concepts (i.e. practice and mastery
through the writing process). See verb lists below.
• Math - add, subtract, multiply, divide, equalize, factor, correspond, graph, plot, compare,
represent, travel, substitute, intersect, calculate, suppose, assume, function, bisect,
depend, vary, estimate, slope, change, interpret, measure, connect, apply, match, distribute,
simplify, evaluate, express, solve, construct, predict, order, designate, assign, follow,
differ, coincide, justify, arrange, demonstrate, operate, extrapolate, draw, determine, find
• History - cause, change, affect, influence, conflict, force, govern, rule; invade, dominate,
rebel, attack, establish, expand, lead to, explore, follow, build, form, export/import,
increase/decrease, support, promote, vanquish, develop, reign, result, contribute, grow,
• Literature - evoke, convey, express, imply, mean, infer, ascertain, contrast, coincide, relate,
begin, proceed, end, tie in, juxtapose, clash, rhyme, alliterate, compare, analyze, symbolize,
represent, relate, connect, explain, describe, expose, inform, interpret, foreshadow entail,
suggest, summarize, imagine, satirize, understate, exaggerate, personify, motivate,
dramatize, connote, denote, characterize, specify, philosophize, translate, narrate, portray,
conflict, empathize
• Chemistry - separate, mix, behave, join, bond, fuse, attract, repel, lower, raise, remain,
liquefy, burn, calculate, discharge, explode, implode, deploy, balance, equate, level, form,
involve, remove, melt, cool, dissolve, heat, change, affect, release, free, oxidize, control,
absorb, differ, maintain, react, act, share, transfer, contain, saturate, exchange, equalize,
occur, produce, complete, respond, evaporate
• Earth Science - fill, develop, split, cleave, cut, flow, spin, drop, raise, increase, decrease,
absorb, weather, erode, build, turn, drift, move, accumulate, maintain, change, support,
release, migrate, sift, dissolve, moderate, float, sink, originate, reflect, radiate, settle,
form, melt, cement, compact, collapse, disintegrate, arrange, date, overturn, precipitate,
elongate, shorten, intensify, weaken, travel, diverge, converge
• Biology - interact; develop, flow, block, react, act, metabolize, pump, oxygenate,
deoxygenate, inflame, expand, contract, nourish, respond, produce, die, protect, reproduce,
exchange, process, perform, digest, excrete, secrete, synthesize, breathe, divide,
differentiate, transmit, filter, cross, graft, regenerate, disperse, fertilize, evolve, mutate,
ingest, control, transport, stimulate, impede, function, connect, hydrate, dehydrate,
acidify, proliferate, decompose
• Physics - push, pull, fly, raise, lower, burn, flow, cohere, adhere, engage, disengage, force,
float, expand, contract, melt, evaporate, sink, spin, differentiate, turn, drive, exert,
convert, balance, calibrate, measure, deflect, bounce, reflect, explode, implode, relay
launch, meet, gather, collect, signal, ignite, draw, touch, attract, repel, rotate, reverse,
vibrate, recycle, counteract, act, react
(Benjamin, 1999
Vocab Alert! - (Stephens & Brown, 2000) – The design of the Vocab Alert! Helps make students
aware of important terms prior to reading or a lecture. It serves as a form of self-assessment as
well as an assessment tool for teachers. Procedure: (a) the teacher selects the most important
words (between 5 and 10) from the text, (b) using the continuum below, students self assess their
familiarity with each term, (c) then the teacher introduces the significance of the terms to the
topic, (d) as the students read/hear the text, they record information, and (e) afterwards the
teacher engages the class in discussion to further clarify and develop understanding of the terms.
List of Words:
1. embargo
2. treaty
3.
Notes:
Vocab-marks - (Stephens & Brown, 2000) -A Vocab-mark is a bookmark made from laminated paper
with spaces for students to list unfamiliar words as they encounter them in their reading.
Procedure: (a) the teacher models finding unfamiliar words while reading and how to record them on
a Vocab-mark and (b) students make their own and begin to list new words, the page number, and a
brief definition (either through a dictionary or a friend). Some teachers structure the use of
Vocab-marks by specifying what students must look for (e.g. three technical terms, two unfamiliar
terms, etc).
Vocabulary Cards - (Kagan, 1990) - These cards are designed to generate higher level thinking
among students in cooperative learning groups. Procedure: (a) the teacher provides a group of four
with the vocabulary words from the unit, (b) after the question is read students pair up in the
group of four to discuss the answer, and (c) then the pairs share their responses with one another;
or (a) the teacher provides pairs with the vocabulary words, (b) student 1 asks the question, (b)
both students write their answers down and then share, and (c) student 2 asks the next question
(and so on). Cards are available from www.kaganonline.com.
Vocabulary Concept Chain - (Billmeyer, 2003) - Students study the vocabulary relating to the
concept being studied. In pairs, they try to determine how the vocabulary words are related in
order to organize the words into a concept chain (e.g. a circular set of words). After all of the
vocabulary words are placed in the appropriate order, students write a relationship sentence which
summarizes how the chain of words expresses the meaning of the concept. See example below.
Beautify
Reuse Recycle
Reduce
Vocabulary Connections - (Brisk & Harrington, 2000) - Choose a reading selection. Choose words
crucial to understanding the selection - preferably in limited semantic fields. Have students look up
the words in a dictionary - in class or as homework. Have students discuss their definitions with one
another in class (i.e. give examples in their own lives of the selected words and their meanings).
Have students read the selection. Have students retell or write a summary of the selection - using
the new vocabulary.
Vocabulary Elaboration - (Brown, Phillips, and Stephens, 1993 in Billmeyer, 2003) - The strategy
has students record a new word, the date it was encountered, and the context in which the word
was found. Students propose a definition and check it against a dictionary or glossary and then
they provide examples and non-examples based on their experiences. Students also record
characteristics or elements which are situational to help them understand different meanings of
the same words. Students work in groups to complete a graphic organizer. These are shared with
other groups. See example two pages down.
Vocabulary Graphics - (Stejnost & Thiese, 2001) - Procedure: (a) give students 5 x 7 index cards,
(b) instruct students to find the meaning of a given word and write it in the center of the card, (b)
tell them to record the following information in each of the card's four corners: a sentence using
the word, a synonym, an antonym, an illustration, and (d) hook the cards together for unit
vocabulary file. See the example below.
WORD: Nucleus
DEFINITION: A nucleus is the center
ILLUSTRATION:
ANTONYM:
edge
Angiosperm
Examples Non-Examples
Elements/Characteristics
Vocabulary Writing in Math – (Billmeyer, 2004) – Learning math is often equated to learning a new
language due to the vocabulary-dense texts and conceptual context within which vocabulary is
presented. One way to help students assimilate mathematical language is to have them create their
own vocabulary journal as follows:
Vocabulary Story Map - (Blachowicz & Fisher, 1996) Integrating new vocabulary with students'
schema or prior experiences makes them more accessible. Procedure: for an upcoming story, map
out the story line choosing vocabulary words that are critical to the story elements (see example).
The possible big ideas section may not be in the story but are needed for effective discussion and
the vocabulary should be used multiple times in discussing, explaining, summarizing, and responding
to the story. See example below.
Characters
Mathilde, who believes there is nothing more humiliating than to look poor among women who are rich.
M. Loisel, who gives his wife 400 francs for a ball gown.
She suffered ceaselessly from the ugliness of her curtains.
Setting
The vestibule of the palace
The ministerial ball
A tented garret
Problem
Mathilde loses a borrowed diamond necklace and is sick with chagrin and anguish.
M. Loisel borrows money and accepts ruinous obligations.
They are impoverished by the debt.
Resolution
M. and Me. Pay the accumulations of debt and interest for years. After the debt is paid, Mathilde sees
the friend from whom she borrowed the necklace and finds out it was only paste.
Word Boxes/Journals & Logs - (Fogarty, 2001) - These are based on the same principles but are for
different age groups. For younger students, shoeboxes are used for individual word boxes.
Students gather new words each day using 8 inch x 3 inch colored construction strips to record
them. Students play the game "Go Fish” mixing their word cards with partners. When students know
their words, they keep them (unknown words are discarded). Word strips are then used to create a
story - some- of which are illustrated, bound and read to others. Over the months students will see
their own progress. Vocabulary journals and logs serve the same purpose for older students as they
use their growing list of words to better understand content specific material.
Word Chains - (Stephens & Brown, 2000) - A word chain provides students with a structure to
explore relationships among words, understand how they can be used, and remember their meanings.
Procedure: (a) the teacher selects 5 to 7 new vocabulary words that are related to the same
concept and models how to develop a word chain based on the connections, (b) the students - in
pairs - are given a group of words, (c) the students develop a word chain and then share it with
another pair (or the rest of the class), and (d) finally each student writes a short paragraph using
the new words in a way that demonstrates their connection.
Word Cards Strategy - (Brisk & Harrington. 2000) - Procedure: Prepare strips of strong cardboard.
Each day have each student give a word; write it on the card. Give the cards to the students to
read alone or to trace the letters. Keep a file box in which to place the cards (first write the names
Word Family Tree - (Buehl, 2001) - This strategy involves students in connecting a key term to its
origins, to related words or words that serve a similar function, and to situations in which one might
expect the word to be used. Procedure: (a) select a group of target words for students to
investigate (i.e. pivotal words in a story, a unit of study, or general-high utility vocabulary) and (b)
have students work with partners or in cooperative groups to complete the organizer using
appropriate resources. See example.
Acquiesce
Who would say it? Pick three kinds of people who might say this word and
write a sentence showing how they might use it:
After a few changes to the The judge told the jury that I will acquiesce to buy your
bill, the senator acquiesced to every member had to computers if you guarantee
vote for it. acquiesce to reach the that they will work for my
verdict. company.
Word of the Week - (Stephens & Brown, 2000) - This process of making new words their own helps
students to construct an ever-widening vocabulary. Procedure: (a) students identify a new word that
they are interested in adding to their vocabularies, (b) they list the word, the part of speech, the
Word Splash - (Burns, 1999) - Word splash sounds very simple but an amazing amount of connected
information is shared in a relatively short amount of time. The strategy may not produce precision
with vocabulary but when the words are encountered in the text, they will not be complete
strangers. Procedure: (a) a variety of words that are integral to the unit are spread across a
transparency, (b) the teacher elicits from the student what is already known about the terms -
including their use in sentences, and (c) the teacher checks off the words as they a re used, (d) The
next step is to predict the story based on the word splash. Seethe example below.
netherworld
Word Walls - (Pinnell & Fountas, 1998) - Procedure: (a) be selective and stingy about what words go
up there, limiting the words to those really common words that students need a lot in writing, (b)
add words gradually - about five a week, (c) make them accessible where everyone can see them,
write them in big letters, and use a variety of colors, (d) practice the words by chanting and writing
them in different ways (i.e. magnetic letters, sand, portable word walls), (e) do a variety of review
activities, (e) make sure that word-wall words are spelled correctly in any writing the students do.
See examples in their books!
Zip Cloze - (Burns, 1999) - Procedure: Put a reading passage on an overhead and block out words
with masking tape. Choosing selected vocabulary words seems more useful than deleting every
seventh word (the usual doze). Students use all the strategies they know to guess the missing
words. When the tape is guessed, the tape is zipped off and students can compare their choice with
the author's.