IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF LD.
CHIEF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE, DWARKA COURTS, NEW DELHI
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASE NO._____ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF :
SUMAN …AGGRIEVED PERSON/APPLICANT
VERSUS
KULDEEP CHAUDHARY …RESPONDENT
INDEX
SL.NO. PARTICULARS PAGES C/FEE
1. MEMO OF PARTIES.
2. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION
12, 18, 19, 20, AND 22 OF
PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT
ALOGNWITH AFFIDAVIT.
3. AFFIDAVIT UNDER SECTION
23(2) OF PROTECTION OF
WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE ACT.
4. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION
23 OF PROTECTION OF WOMEN
FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
ACT, FOR INTERIM RELIEF
ALONG WITH SUPPORTING
AFFIDAVIT
5. DETAILS OF DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE
6. DETAILED AFFIDAVIT OF THE
AGGRIEVED PERSON
7. LIST OF DOCUMENTS ALONG
WITH DOCUMENTS
8. VAKALATNAMA
NEW DELHI:
DATED : /02/2025 FILED BY:
(RAKESH BAIRWA)
ADVOCATES
CHAMBER NO.556,
DWARKA COURTS COMPLEX,
SECTOR-10, DWARKA,
NEW DELHI-110075
M-8130541806
IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF LD. CHIEF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE, DWARKA COURTS, NEW DELHI
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASE NO._____ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF :
SUMAN …AGGRIEVED PERSON/APPLICANT
VERSUS
KULDEEP CHAUDHARY …RESPONDENT
MEMO OF PARTIES
SUMAN
W/O MR. KULDEEP CHAUDHARY
D/O MR. LACHHE RAM VASHIST
R/O 335-A, D-BLOCK, AJAY PARK
NAJAFGARH, NEWDELHI-110043
CURRENTLY RESIDING AT:
BUILDING NO. 18, VIRBHADRA
SWAMI NILAYA, 3RD MAIN, 20TH CROSS,
MANAL ROAD, RAJIV GANDHI
NAGAR, HSR SECTOR 7,
BANGALORE-560068 …AGGRIEVED PERSON/
APPLICANT
VERSUS
KULDEEP CHAUDHARY
S/O LATE. MALKHAN SINGH
R/O 301, 3 R D FLOOR, 5 T H CROSS ROAD,
HSR LAYOUT, SOMASANDRA PALYA,
BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560102 …. RESPONDENT
NEW DELHI:
DATED : /02/2025 FILED BY:
(RAKESH BAIRWA)
ADVOCATES
CHAMBER NO.556,
DWARKA COURTS COMPLEX,
SECTOR-10, DWARKA,
NEW DELHI-110075
M-8130541806
IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF LD. CHIEF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE, DWARKA COURTS, NEW DELHI
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASE NO._____ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF :
SUMAN …AGGRIEVED PERSON/APPLICANT
VERSUS
KULDEEP CHAUDHARY …RESPONDENT
P.S.: NAJAFGARH
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 12,18,19,20 & 22 OF
PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
ACT, 2005 (43 OF 2005)
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH
1. It is submitted that the application Under Section
12,18,19,20 and 22 of Protection of Women from
Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005) is being filed
by aggrieved person/applicant against the respondent
along with affidavit and domestic incident report .
a) Aggrieved person:
SUMAN
W/O MR. KULDEEP CHAUDHARY
D/O MR. LACHHE RAM VASHIST
R/O 335-A, D-BLOCK, AJAY PARK
NAJAFGARH, NEWDELHI-110043
AND
BUILDING NO. 18, VIRBHADRA
SWAMI NILAYA, 3RD MAIN, 20TH CROSS,
MANAL ROAD, RAJIV GANDHI
NAGAR, HSR SECTOR 7,
BANGALORE-560068
b) Protection Officer:
c) Any other person on behalf of the
Aggrieved person:
2. It is respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be
pleased to take cognizance of the complaint (attached
with the complaint) and pass all/any of the orders, as
deemed necessary in the circumstances of the case.
a) Pass Protection order U/S 18 and/or
b) Pass Residence order U/S 19 and/or
c) Direct the Respondent to pay monetary relief U/S 20
and/or
d) Direct the respondents to grant compensation or
damages U/S 22 and/or
e) Pass orders to grant interim and ex-parte orders U/S
23(1) & (2) and/or
f) Pass any other or further order/s as deems fit in with the
circumstances of the case.
ORDERS REQUIRED
(i) Protection Order Under Section 18
(a) Prohibiting acts of domestic violence by granting an
injunction against the Respondent from repeating any
of the acts mentioned in statements of facts/ domestic
incident report of the application.
(b) Prohibiting any form of communication by the
respondent with AGGREIVED PERSON/APPLICANT .
(c) Prohibiting alienation of assets by the respondent.
The Respondent No.1 is having one house measuring
about 750 sq. Yards in Chandenakoli,Saharanpur and
agricultural land about 22 bighas.
N.B.: The aggrieved person/applicant has been residing in rented
accommodation at the above-mentioned address since 04.06.2024.
The aggrieved person/applicant also came to know that the
Respondent are in process to sale that house and there is an
apprehension that they may sale that property. It is prayed that
the Respondent may kindly be restricted to sale the property and
assets.
(d) Any other order(s), please specify:
Order may be against the Respondent restraining them from
any of the acts mentioned above because domestic violence
as defined under Section 2(g) read with Section 3 of the Act
has unrestricted become the order of day.
(ii) RESIDENCE ORDER UNDER SECTION 19
An Order restraining Respondent from: -
(a) Dispossess and thrown out the applicant/aggrieved
person from the shared household.
The aggrieved person/applicant is presently living in
rented accommodation i.e. BUILDING NO. 18, VIRBHADRA
SWAMI NILAYA, 3RD MAIN, 20TH CROSS, MANAL ROAD, RAJIV
GANDHI NAGAR, HSR SECTOR 7, BANGALORE-560068.
(b) Entering that portion of the shared household in which
the AGGREIVED PERSON/APPLICANT/ aggrieved
resided.
The respondent and his associates are restrained from
entering the accommodation, where the Aggrieved
person/Applicant is currently residing i.e. BUILDING
NO. 18, VIRBHADRA SWAMI NILAYA, 3RD MAIN, 20TH
CROSS, MANAL ROAD, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR, HSR
SECTOR 7, BANGALORE-560068 and disturbing the
aggrieved person/applicant.
(C) Renouncing his rights in the shared household.
An order directing Respondent to: -
(a) Secure same level of alternate accommodation or pay
rent for the same.
(b) Any order restraining respondent from alienating/
disposing/ encumbering the shared
household/matrimonial house and any property or
agricultural land.
Therefore, an ex-parte order is very necessary, and this
Hon’ble Court may kindly direct the Respondent not to dispose of
his assets. The aggrieved person/applicant is residing in rented
accommodation and is at the mercy of parents, friends and
relatives for her daily expenses . That the Respondent be directed
not to dispose of any kind of security i.e. Share, Debenture, Bond
etc. stands in the name of Respondent. The Respondent may also
be directed to disclose their assets by filing a list of the same
duly supported by an affidavit.
The Respondent never allowed the aggrieved person to
have access to her personal belongings such as her jewelry,
costly clothes and other household articles. Those articles are in
the possession of the Respondent which have been given by the
parents of the aggrieved person to the respondent and his family
members after the marriage. Therefore, the Respondent may
kindly be directed to return personal belongings/Istridhan of the
aggrieved person to her.
The Respondent may kindly be directed not to dispose, sell,
alienate their moveable and immoveable properties.
(C) Any other order please specify:
The Respondent may be directed to return Istridhan articles
including gold and silver jewelry articles of the aggrieved
person/ applicant. He may also be directed not to repeat the
violence (physical, mental and sexual etc.) threat of selling
properties and assets including share, debenture, bond etc.
adopting any sort of torturing tactics on the aggrieved
person/applicant and also the Respondent may be directed to stop
violence and totally deprive himself from acting any other
act/omission, which lead to the hurdles/disturbances to the
peaceful life of the aggrieved person/applicant.
Any such order or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may
deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the
interest of justice.
(iii) MONETARY RELIEF UNDER SECTION 20
Loss due to destruction/damage or removal of property from of
the aggrieved person.
Amount Claimed Rs.20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lac Only).
Any other loss or physical or mental injury as specified in
Statement of facts.
Any other amount in the form of damages, which this
Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the
case, may also be passed.
(iv). MONETARY RELIEF UNDER SECTION 20
Directing Respondent to pay the following monthly expenses as
monetary relief:
1. Food, clothes, shelter, medication, Allowance, for other
basic amenities : Rs.25,000/-
2. Other Expenses : Rs.15,000/-
Total : Rs.40,000/
Any other order may be incurred by the aggrieved person from
time to time during the trial of this case.
(vi) COMPENSATION UNDER SECTION 22:
The Respondent be directed to pay Rs.10,00,000/-(Rupees Ten
Lac only) to the aggrieved person/applicant for mental torture
and emotional distress caused by the acts of domestic violence.
3. DETAILS OF PREVIOUS LITIGATION:
The AGGREIVED PERSON/APPLICANT has filed one
complaint dated 04.01.2023 to DCP, SPVWAC, Nanakpura,
New Delhi-110021.
PRAYER
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed this Hon’ble Court
be pleased to grant the relief(s) claimed therein paragraph 2 and
3 of this application and pass such order or orders as this Hon’ble
Court may deem fit and proper under the given facts and
circumstances of the case for protecting the aggrieved person
from domestic violence and in the interest of justice.
Any other or further order as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit
and proper may also be passed in favour of the aggrieved
person/applicant and against the Respondent.
NEW DELHI:
DATED : .02.2025 AGGRIEVED PERSON/
APPLICANT
(SUMAN)
THROUGH
(RAKESH BAIRWA)
ADVOCATES
CHAMBER NO.556,
DWARKA COURTS COMPLEX,
SECTOR-10, DWARKA,
NEW DELHI-110075
M-8130541806
VERIFICATION:
I, SUMAN, the above-named aggrieved person/applicant
verified that the content of Paras No. to of the above
application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
information received and believed to be true and nothing material
has been concealed therefrom.
Verified at NEW DELHI on this day of February 2025
AGGRIEVED PERSON/
APPLICANT
(SUMAN)
IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF LD. CHIEF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE, DWARKA COURTS, NEW DELHI
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASE NO._____ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF :
SUMAN …AGGRIEVED PERSON/APPLICANT
VERSUS
KULDEEP CHAUDHARY …RESPONDENT
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 23 OF PROTECTION OF
WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 (43 OF
2005) FOR GRANT OF INTERIM AND EX-PARTE ORDERS
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That the applicant/aggrieved person SUMAN has filed
accompanying application Under Section 12 of the
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
against the Respondents. The contents of the same may be
read and taken as part and parcel of present application for
the sake of brevity.
2. That the applicant seeks the ad-interim relief of seeking the
directions of this Hon’ble Court to the Respondent for the
grant of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) per
monthly allowance to maintain herself and also a direction
to the Respondent not to dispose of his assets as has been
mentioned with the application Under Section 12 of the Act
and also not to leave the country without the permission of
this Hon’ble Court, inter alia on following grounds:
A. That the applicant/aggrieved person has no other source
of income for her living and to meet her daily needs and
is totally dependent for the same upon the parents,
friends and relatives of the applicant.
B. That the Respondent is not exerting/ fulfilling any of his
responsibilities.
C. That the Respondent is creating each and every illegal
and unethical acts to create disturbance in the life of the
applicant/aggrieved person, torture her mentally and
physically and made her life miserable and hell.
D. That the Respondent has committed series of acts which
are covered under definition of “DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE” of the Act.
E. That the Respondent is not paying any amount so as to
fulfill the basic needs of the applicant/aggrieved person,
which is covered under the definition of “ ECONOMIC
ABUSE” under Section 3 of the Act.
F. That the Respondent has deprived the aggrieved person
from her legitimate rights and threatened that he will
very soon dispose of all his assets and business
establishment in India including the shared house and
leave the country.
G. Any other ground that may be taken with the due
permission of this Hon’ble Court during the Course of
Arguments in the present application.
H. That the applicant/aggrieved person has not filed any
other application/petition seeking similar relief under
this Act before any Court of Law.
PRAYER
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that in view of
the above-mentioned facts, circumstances and grounds, this
Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:
(A) direct the Respondent to pay an ad-interim ex-parte
amount of Rs.40,000/-(Rupees Forty Thousand only)
per month to the applicant/ aggrieved person for the
maintenance of herself.
(B) Direct the Respondents not to dispose of his assets and
business establishments in India.
(C) Direct the Respondent to return the Istridhan articles
including jewelry of the aggrieved person.
(D) Direct the Respondent to arrange alternative rented
accommodation or to pay Rs. 15,000/- per month as
rent.
(E) Direct the Respondent not to leave the country without
the permission of this Hon’ble Court.
(F) Direct the Respondent not to enter in the house
occupied by the applicant/ aggrieved person where she
is residing and also not to interfere and disturb her in
her personal day-to-day life.
(G) Direct the Respondent not to harass the
applicant/aggrieved person in the portion of the
property where the applicant/aggrieved person is
presently residing.
Pass any other or further orders which this Hon’ble
Court deems fit and proper in favour of the applicant/
aggrieved person and against the Respondent.
NEW DELHI:
DATED : .02.2025 AGGRIEVED PERSON/
APPLICANT
(SUMAN)
THROUGH
(RAKESH BAIRWA)
ADVOCATES
CHAMBER NO.556,
DWARKA COURTS COMPLEX,
SECTOR-10, DWARKA,
NEW DELHI-110075
M-8130541806
IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF LD. CHIEF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE, DWARKA COURTS, NEW DELHI
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASE NO._____ OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF :
SUMAN …AGGRIEVED PERSON/APPLICANT
VERSUS
KULDEEP CHAUDHARY …RESPONDENT
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
1. MARRIAGE PHOTOGRAPHS
2. PHOTOCOPY OF THE MARRIAGE REGISTRATION
CERTIFICATE
3. PHOTOCOPY OF AADHAR CARD OF AGGRIEVED
PERSON
4. PHOTOCOPY OF COMPLAINTS FILED BY THE
AGGRIEVED PERSON BEFORE C.A.W. CELL,
5. ANY OTHER DOCUMENT/S WITH THE
PERMISSION OF THIS HON’BLE COURT.
NEW DELHI:
DATED : .02.2025 FILED BY:
(RAKESH BAIRWA)
ADVOCATES
CHAMBER NO.745,
DWARKA COURTS COMPLEX,
SECTOR-10, DWARKA,
NEW DELHI-110075
DETAILS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
1. That the marriage was solemnized between the Aggrieved
person/Applicant and the Respondent on 21 s t July 2018, in
Najafgarh, New Delhi according to Hindu Rites and
ceremonies and the marriage was consummated at Najafgarh
and no issue was born out the wedlock.
2. Ever since, i.e. for the last 6 and half years, the Complainant
has been suffering physical and mental abuse, pain,
helplessness, unhappiness and anger on account of the
Respondent. Eventually, being unable to bear with the trauma
and agony, the Aggrieved person/Applicant fearing for her
life, being destitute without any money and stridhan has been
constrained to file the present complaint.
3. It is submitted that the marriage between the Aggrieved
person/Applicant and the Respondent was a love marriage.
The parties come from very different backgrounds. The
Aggrieved person/Applicant belongs to a closely knit family
with a lot of family values and culture. On the other hand, the
Respondent belongs to a family where he had been living
separately from his family for past many years and is driven
only by money and materialistic things.
4. It is further submitted that the first incident relating to
domestic violence occurred in Mussoorie, July 2018, when the
Aggrieved person/Applicant went for honeymoon with the
Respondent. The Respondent got a call from his brother-in-
law and asked the Respondent to transfer about the 1.5 Lakh
rupees to his account. When the Aggrieved person/Applicant
inquired about the above-mention ed amount which he was
giving to his brother-in-law, the Respondent got furious and
started slapping and abusing the Aggrieved person/Applicant
and asked to mind her own business. Aggrieved
person/Applicant was shocked to see his behaviour towards
her and that too on their honeymoon. It is pertinent to mention
here that the Respondent lied to the Aggrieved
person/Applicant before marriage about the informal loan
from his brother-in-law. He told the Aggrieved
person/Applicant that he had an informal loan of Rs. 5.5 Lakh
which he already settled.
5. Later, the Complainant found out that the Respondent has
lied to her. The actual amount for the informal loan was about
12 lakh rupees. Upon being confronted by the Complainant,
she was repeatedly abused and beaten up by the Respondent.
6. It is also pertinent to mention that the Respondent after
abusing the Aggrieved person/Applicant physically and
mentally, pushed the Aggrieved person/Applicant into the bed
and forced her to stay there without clothes. When the
Aggrieved person/Applicant asked the Respondent to give her
clothes to wear, he again abused her and asked her to sit
quietly in the bed without clothes. After, some time, the
Respondent apologized the Aggrieved person/Applicant and
said that he would repeat the same.
7. It is also submitted that the Aggrieved person/Applicant had
suffered multiple miscarriages on the account of violent and
barbaric nature of the Respondent. It is submitted that the the
Aggrieved person/Applicant had her first miscarriage on 27 t h
October 2018. It is submitted that when the the Aggrieved
person/Applicant informed the Respondent of her pregnancy,
the Respondent asked her to go for abortion as the Respondent
did not want to have a baby. It is submitted that the
Respondent was not employed at the time of marriage .
8. It is pertinent to mention that the Respondent told the
Aggrieved person/Applicant that he would not be able to
afford the expenses of a child. However, the the Aggrieved
person/Applicant filled with joy of being a mother, did not
want to abort her unborn child. This led to an argument
between the Aggrieved person/Applicant and the Respondent.
It is submitted that the Respondent stood up on the bed and
started to shout and hurl abuses on the Aggrieved
person/Applicant. When the Aggrieved person/Applicant tried
to calm the Respondent down and went to him on the bed as
well but to no avail. It is submitted that the Respondent is
strong physically and has a bad temper. In the ensuing chaos,
the Respondent pushed down the Aggrieved person/Applicant
from the bed so badly that the Aggrieved person/Applicant
had a sever pain in the stomach and the bleeding followed.
This incident led to the Complainant’s first miscarriage three
days later of the incident on 27 t h October 2018.
9. It is submitted that the Respondent requested the Aggrieved
person/Applicant that she should not inform anyone about the
said incident as it was unintentional, and it happened in the
heat of the moment and the Aggrieved person/Applicant
forgave him didn’t say anything to anyone. It is pertinent to
mention that later, the Respondent was even audacious enough
to mock the Aggrieved person/Applicant and revealing that he
had pushed the Aggrieved person/Applicant intentionally.
10. It is further submitted that for nearly a month, the Aggrieved
person/Applicant experienced continuous bleeding and
excruciating pain. Despite repeated requests by the Aggrieved
person/Applicant for medical attention, the Respondent coldly
refused, claiming that he had no money as he was
unemployed. Also, when the Aggrieved person/Applicant, in
desperation, asked the Respondent to seek financial help from
his family, whom he regularly supports with his farming
income, the Respondent refused with complete indifference,
declaring that it was his money, and he would use it as he
pleased.
11. It is further submitted that the Respondent forced the Complainant to
seek medical assistance at a government health centre. The respondent
accompanied the Complainant but displayed gross inappropriate
behaviour. It is submitted that when the Complainant, weak and in
pain, arrived at the hospital with the Respondent, he did not
offer her support but instead used the moment to torment her
further. The Complainant was too weak to stand in the queue, so
the Respondent stood in line on her behalf. However, instead of
showing care, he made inappropriate gestures, indicating that
another woman was standing too close to him, deliberately
trying to provoke the petitioner’s already fragile emotional
state.
12. The Complainant politely requested the woman to maintain some
space, but instead of understanding, she was met with hostility
and rudely dismissed. The Respondent sided with the woman,
abandoning the Complainant emotionally in a place where she
already felt so vulnerable and exposed. However, the
Respondent’s cruelty did not stop there.
13. It is submitted that the Respondent, in a fit of rage, started
hurling abuses and tore the Complainant’s medical prescription.
After destroying her prescription, the Respondent left the
Complainant stranded at the hospital. He drove away, refusing to
answer her calls, leaving her physically weak, emotionally
shattered, and completely abandoned. It is further submitted
that at the time of the incident, the Respondent, was not giving
any money to the Complainant.
14. This is to submit that on 18 th March 2019, we were residing in a rented
apartment in Najafgarh. This is to submit that on the above mentioned
date, when the Respondent came back from his office in the evening, the
Complainant saw his phone ringing continuously. Upon asking the
Respondent about the same, she was dismissed by telling that it is a call
from the office and is not of significant importance. This created a doubt
in the mind of the complainant. When the phone rang the next time, the
Complainant picked up the call and to her utter shock the call was not
from the Respondent’s office but from a girl claiming to be Respondent’s
girlfriend. The girl on the other end asked the complaint as to who she is
and when the complaint told her that she is the wife of Respondent
Kuldeep Chaudhary, she was also shocked. Upon asking the Respondent
about her, the respondent grabbed the leg of the Complainant and pulled
the complainant on the ground making her fall from the bed and started
to beat her mercilessly. The Complainant ran downstairs and locked
herself in the downstairs neighbour’s house. The Respondent repeatedly
knocked on the door, shouting in the building.
15. The Respondent, on the pretext of that he will tell the
complainant everything and even will take the complainant to
meet the girl on phone, asked the Complainant to come out of
the neighbour’s house. The Complainant believing him came
out and was again beaten by the belt by the Respondent.
However, Complainant, while she was in the neighbour’s
house, had called Police on 100. Luckily, the Police arrived
on time and a complaint was registered against the
Respondent where he admitted that he was indeed in a
physical relationship with the girl on the phone, even before
the marriage and continued his affair even after the marriage.
16. The complainant spoke to the girl and found out that she was
19 years old and the Respondent had told her that he is a
singer and is of 21 years of age.The Respondent apologised to
the Complainant and took her home promising not to repeat
the same again.
17. This is to submit that the Complainant was constantly living
in fear of her life as the Respondent is strong physically and
has a bad temper, was aggressive, loud and completely
unpredictable in his reaction to the situation. It is also
submitted that around September 2019, owing to constant
fights and quarrels, the complainant decided to visit her
maternal home for some time. During this time no attempts
were made by the Respondent to diffuse the situation between
them.
18. On the contrary, the complainant found out that the
Respondent is selling the items of their rented apartment as he
will vacate the house. The respondent also told her that he
will be shifting to Bangalore as he got a job there.
19. The Complainant asked the Respondent to take her with him
but he denied and told her that once he is settled there, he will
call her there. It is also submitted the Complainant didn’t
even knew where the Respondent was working and living.
20. It is also submitted that on 15th December 2019, the
complainant, in lieu of the Respondent’s birthday, went to
Bangalore, in order to surprise and reconcile with him. To the
Complainant’s utter shock, multiple sim cards were
discovered from the Respondent of which the Complainant
had no clue. Upon asking, one of the sim cards was instantly
flushed by the Respondent and the Complainant was again
beaten up by the Respondent, not even allowing her to leave
the home. The Complainant was beaten so badly that she
started bleeding from her mouth. Upon hearing the
commotion, the landlord came up and told them to vacate if
the same was to be continued. Upon that the Respondent
apologised to the land lord and the Complainant and promised
not to repeat the same again.
21. This is to submit that Complainant shifted to Bangalore with
Respondent on 19th October 2020. It is also submitted that the
Respondent lost his job around October 2020 during COVID-
19 pandemic. In lieu of that, Respondent shifted back to New
Delhi rather than looking for a job. The complainant was left
at her maternal home by the Respondent and was told that
once a suitable accommodation is arranged, the Respondent
will take the Complainant along with him. However, the
Respondent went to the marriage of her sister’s daughter to
which the Complainant was not invited to and spent a sum of
around 1.5 lakh rupees in that. After that, the Respondent
returned and reconciled with the Complainant promising that
he will never hit her again. This is also submitted that in the
month of April 2020, both of them shifted to Bangalore,
expenses of which were managed by the Complainant.
22. This is to submit that during the journey back to Bangalore,
the Respondent felt sick and as soon as they reached back, the
Respondent starting taunting the Complainant for his bad
health stating that she is cause of him falling sick. The
complainant fearing of the health of the Respondent, wanted
to take him to the hospital but the same was denied by the
Respondent telling that he will not visit a government
hospital. Upon that, the complainant spent a sum of around
40,000 rupees in the treatment of the Respondent. The
respondent was tested positive for COVID and home
quarantine was done. Around the same time, the Complainant
also felt sick due to COVID as she was in the close proximity
of the Respondent taking care of him.
23. It is submitted that an argument broke out between the
Complainant and the Respondent when the Respondent’s
family, even after knowing that the Complainant too has got
COVID, failed to share even a shred of compassion towards
her. In the pursuance of this argument, the Respondent beat up
the Complainant and even broke her phone.
24. It is submitted that a call was made to the Police on 100 but
no formal complaint was registered as both the Respondent
and Complainant had COVID and were in home quarantine.
However, an apology was made in front of the Police Officials
and the Respondent promised to repay the medical expenses
and promised again not to beat her up.
25. This is to submit that another incident of domestic violence occurred on
19th August 2021 when the Respondent was leaving the shower, and the
door was opened, the complainant saw the Respondent picking up a sim
card from inside. Upon inquiring by the Complainant, the same sim card
was thrown out of the window. The complainant tried to retrieve it by
going downstairs but yet again was beaten mercilessly.
26. This is to submit that around 6th April 2024, when we were
residing in HSR Layout, Bangalore, the Respondent started to
come home late very frequently. The Respondent used to be
agitated and used to fight physically and was being constantly
abusive towards the Complainant.
27. In one of the instances, the Respondent blocked the
Complainant from all the points of contact and didn’t came
back for at least 4 to 5 days. When the Respondent returned
back, the Complainant found a ticket confirming that the
Respondent went to Pune.
28. In one of the other instances, while returning from grocery
shopping, the Respondent told the complainant that he won’t
be returning home in the night. Upon inquiring about it, the
Respondent got angry and took the house keys and ran
towards the home leaving the Complainant in the middle in
the car fully knowing that the Complainant does not know
how to drive and would not be able to pursue the Respondent.
When the Complainant reached home, she found the
Respondent packing his belongings and getting ready to leave.
It is also submitted that in the ensuing argument, the
Respondent slapped the Complainant multiple times and even
broke the television set as well.
29. The respondent is earning handsomely. The last known salary
of the respondent was approx. rupees 13 LPA and along with
that the Respondent also got promoted recently. The current
exact figures are not known to the Complainant.
30. In Six and half years, the Complainant has selflessly given in
this relationship emotionally, physically, mentally, monetarily
and demanded nothing but self-respect, support and love
which she was deprived off.
31. That the complainant has filed various police complaints at
Najafgarh as well as at Bangalore regarding acts of domestic
violence inflicted by the Respondent upon the complainant.
32. The Complainant today is left with no self-respect, no self-
esteem, no confidence and everything has been taken away
from her. The Complainant is mentally and emotionally
shattered today.
33. The Complainant has suffered immense pain and hurt from the
Respondent. The Complainant has not slept one night in peace
for as long as she can remember. The Complainant is
mentally, physically and emotionally scarred/drained and she
is unable to carry on any more like this.
34. It is submitted that the Respondent is having sufficient means
but despite that is neglecting and refusing to maintain the
Complainant. Complainant is unable to maintain herself.
35. It is prayed that the Hon’ble Court may take cognizance of the
Domestic Incident and pass the following orders, as deemed
necessary in the circumstances of the present case.
36. That the Applicant is residing at 335-A, D-BLOCK, AJAY
PARK NAJAFGARH, NEWDELHI-110043 and all the
incidents and acts of domestic violence has taken place at
Najafgarh also and further cause of action has arisen within
the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court, hence this Hon’ble
Court has territorial jurisdiction to try, entertain and decide
the present case.
(SUMAN)