0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views

Computer Vision rubrics

The document outlines the lab rubrics for the Computer Vision course, detailing criteria for evaluating problem identification, analysis, design, implementation, presentation, and documentation. It includes a grading scale from exemplary to not satisfactory for each phase, along with parameters for the end semester examination and practical assessments. The assessment focuses on the quality of solutions, execution, and result analysis, with specific points allocated for each category.

Uploaded by

lalita
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views

Computer Vision rubrics

The document outlines the lab rubrics for the Computer Vision course, detailing criteria for evaluating problem identification, analysis, design, implementation, presentation, and documentation. It includes a grading scale from exemplary to not satisfactory for each phase, along with parameters for the end semester examination and practical assessments. The assessment focuses on the quality of solutions, execution, and result analysis, with specific points allocated for each category.

Uploaded by

lalita
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Computer Vision (24ECSE317) Lab Rubrics

Phases Exemplary Satisfactory Needs Not satisfactory


( 8-10 ) ( 5-7 ) Improvement ( 0-1 )
(2 - 4)
Problem The problem The problem The problem is The problem
Identification statement is clear, statement is clear vaguely defined or statement lacks
(PI - 2.1.2) concise, and but comprises of lacks significant clarity. It is unclear,
specific. It clearly ambiguities. clarity, resulting in
doesn't provide
identifies the difficulties to
problem, its understand the context, and doesn't
context, and its issue. adequately convey
scope. the issue.

Analysis Basic Features The majority of The features and The appropriate
(PI - 1.4.3) and filtering highly the features and filtering poorly features and filtering
relevant.algorithms filtering prepared with major are missing or
collected are relevant and issues in handling. irrelevant.
systematically and appropriate. But, Inadequate, with
prepared with minor issues exist significant problems
thorough
knowledge.

Design Decision and Decision and Design is Decision and design


(PI – 2.3.1) design design inappropriate or recommendation are
recommendations recommendation poorly selected. The not relevant.
have a strong base are reasonable. approach lacks
and justification. structure.
Implementation Selection of Selection of Significant technical Needs improvement
(PI-5.3.1) appropriate appropriate problems or major in the analytical tools
analytical tools and analytical tools functionality issues. and/or software
techniques. and techniques. The project may not engineering
Developed code Developed code work as intended or techniques.
that follows the lacks core features. The developed code
that follows the
design is not mapping to the
design specification, but design specification.
can be further
specification.
improved.
The presentation is The presentation There is ambiguity in Communication is
professionally is understandable the presentation. The ineffective. Time
Presentation delivered. The but may lack speaker is management may be
(PI-10.2.2) speaker exhibits engagement. The unconfident. There is inconsistent.
strong confidence. speaker shows clear time
Demo is delivered some confidence management.
within the allotted but may struggles
time. with articulation.
Documentation is Documentation is Documentation is Documentation is
and Report (PI- comprehensive, ordered and unclear, poorly desperately
10.1.2) well-organized. comprehensive. structured, Key organized, with
could be points don’t carry significant problems
structured better. clarity. with clarity.
Lab End Semester Examination Parameters

Parameters Write_Up: Solution for the Problem statement in 5


brief

Implementation 10

Result Analysis 5

Total Marks 20

End Semester Assessment (ESA) Rubrics for Practical (P) component


Parameters Excellent Competent Scope for PI Code
Improvement
(Evaluated for
20 M)

Algorithm Writing Able to write Able to write Able to write 2.1.2


solution without solution by solution with
(5 M) errors. Incorporated considering some warnings or errors.
all inputs and inputs and (0-1M)
conditions.(4-5M) conditions .(2-3M)

Execution (10 M) Able to execute Able to execute Able to execute 2.1.2


solution without solution but solution with
errors for all inputs exceptional warnings or errors
conditions are (1-4M)
and exceptional
missing.(5-7M)
conditions.(8-10 M)

Result Analysis Comprehensively Has difficulty in Fails to identify 1.4.3


(5M) analyzes and identifying or appropriate solution
applies correct characterizing the for given problem.
solution.(4-5M) correct solution for (0-1M)
given problem.

(2-3M)

You might also like