0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views1 page

4_Practice Exercises_Math 122

The document outlines practice exercises due on February 25, 2025, requiring solutions in a PDF format. It includes tasks such as proving tautologies, simplifying logical statements, using truth tables for validity, and testing logical arguments. Participants must submit their answers via a provided Google Drive link by the specified deadline.

Uploaded by

Mark Deo Tan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views1 page

4_Practice Exercises_Math 122

The document outlines practice exercises due on February 25, 2025, requiring solutions in a PDF format. It includes tasks such as proving tautologies, simplifying logical statements, using truth tables for validity, and testing logical arguments. Participants must submit their answers via a provided Google Drive link by the specified deadline.

Uploaded by

Mark Deo Tan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Practice Exercises 4

February 25, 2025

Please provide complete solutions for the following problems. Submit your answers as a PDF
file (filename format: LastName_FirstName) no later than 11:30 AM on February 25, 2025, via
the Google Drive folder.
Link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1SJaVCAwI11J-
rbR1SZzyMtaNEIlpWV2M?usp=sharing

A. Show without constructing truth tables that the formulas are tautologies:
1. ~𝑝 → (𝑝 → 𝑞)
2. (𝑝 ∧ 𝑞) → (𝑝 → 𝑞)
3. [𝑝 ∧ (𝑝 → 𝑞)] → 𝑞
4. (𝑝 ∧ ~𝑝) → 𝑞

B. Simplify the statement formula using logically equivalent statements.


𝑝 → {𝑞 ∧ [(𝑝 ∧ ~𝑞) ∨ ~𝑝]}

C. Use truth table to determine whether the following argument form is valid.
1. 𝑝 → 𝑞
𝑞
∴𝑝

2. 𝑝 → 𝑞
𝑝→𝑟
∴ 𝑝 → (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)

D. Test the validity of the following arguments:


𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑥, 𝑥 𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑜𝑟 𝑥 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒.
𝐼𝑓 𝑥 𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒, 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑥 2 > 0. 𝐼𝑓 𝑥 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑣𝑒, 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑥 2 > 0. 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒, 𝑥 2 > 0.

E. Test whether the given argument is logically valid.

If I do all the exercises in this chapter, then I will understand the module. If I understand the
module, then I will do well on the exam. If I do well on the exam, then I will pass. I passed the
exam. Therefore, I did all the exercises in this chapter.

F. Let 𝑃(𝑥, 𝑦) denote the sentence 𝑥 + 𝑦 = 7. If the domain of 𝑥 and 𝑦 is the set of all integers,
then what is the truth value of the following? Justify your answer.
1. ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝑃(𝑥, 𝑦)
2. ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝑃(𝑥, 𝑦)
3. ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑃(𝑥, 𝑦)

G. Test the validity of the logical argument.


All employers pay their employees.
Juan is an employer.
Therefore, Juan pays his employees.

You might also like