TCW PRELIMS
TCW PRELIMS
minerals).
Conclusion
The Napoleonic Wars lasted from Until now, states are considered sovereign,
1803-1815 with Napoleon and his armies and Napoleonic attempts to violently impose
marching all over much of Europe. In every systems of government in other countries
country they conquered, the French are frowned upon. Moreover, like the
implemented the Napoleonic Code that Concert system, “great powers” still hold
forbade birth privileges, encouraged significant influence over world politics. For
freedom or religion, and promoted example, the most powerful grouping in the
meritocracy in government service. This UN, the Security Council, has a core of five
system shocked the monarchies and the permanent members, all having veto
hereditary elites (dukes, duchesses, etc.) of powers over the council's decision-making
Europe, and they mustered their armies to process.
push back against the French emperor.
Internationalism
Anglo and Prussian armies finally; defeated
Napoleon in the Battle of Waterloo in 1815,
ending the latter's mission to spread his
The Westphalian and Concert systems
liberal codé across Europe.
divided the world into separate, sovereign
entities.
To prevent another war and to keep their
systems of privilege, the royal powers
Since the existence of this interstate
created a new system that, in effect,
system, there have been attempts to
restored the Westphalian system.
transcend it. Some,like Bonaparte,directly
challenged the system by infringing on other
The Concert of Europe was an alliance of
states' sovereignty,while others sought to
“great powers” -the United Kingdom,
imagine other systems of governance that
Austria, Russia, and Prussia-that sought to
go beyond,but do not necessarily
restore the world of monarchical, hereditary,
challenge,sovereignty.
and religious privileges of the time before
the French Revolution and the Napoleonic
Still, others imagine a system of heightened
Wars.
interaction between various sovereign
states, particularly the desire for greater
More importantly, it was an ålliance that
cooperation and unity among states and
sought to restore the sovereignty of states.
peoples, This desire is called
Under this Metternich system (named after
internationalism
the Austrian diplomat, Klemens von
Internationalism comes in different forms, To many,these proposals for global
but the principle may be divided into two government and international law seemed
broad categories: liberal internationalism to represent challenges to states. Would not
and socialist internationalism. a world government, in effect,become
supreme?And would not its laws overwhelm
the sovereignty of individual states?
Immanuel Kant
CONCLUSION
● Tracing the roots of international
system by a short history of
internationalism