Cambridge International AS & A Level: Geography 9696/31
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Geography 9696/31
GEOGRAPHY 9696/31
Paper 3 Advanced Physical Geography Options May/June 2024
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 60
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2024 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level
descriptions for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
marks are not deducted for errors
marks are not deducted for omissions
answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Item level Short statement to justify the level given Levels-marked questions only:
comment for an essay, using wording from the Essay questions
mark scheme
2. Additional page has been checked 2. All blank pages in the provided generic
answer booklet and/or extension answer
booklet(s).
Examiners must consider the following guidance when marking the essay questions:
Candidates are free to develop their own approach to the question and responses will vary depending
on the example(s) chosen. Whichever approach is chosen, essays which address the question and
support their argument with relevant examples will be credited. The direction of the response and
evaluation made will depend on the approach chosen, and any evaluation is therefore valid if argued
and based on evidence.
Tropical environments
1(a) Fig. 1.1 shows a pyramid of biomass for a seasonally humid tropical 3
(savanna) ecosystem.
Award marks based on the quality of explanation and breadth of the response
using the marking levels below.
Level 3 (6–7)
Response clearly explains the pattern described in (a). Response is well
founded in detailed knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the
topic. Examples used are appropriate and integrated effectively into the
response.
Level 2 (3–5)
Response explains the pattern described in (a). Response develops on a
largely secure base of knowledge and understanding. Examples may lack
detail or development.
Level 1 (1–2)
Response explains the pattern described in (a). Knowledge is basic and
understanding may be inaccurate. Examples are in name only or lacking
entirely.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
Different types of karst landforms tend to form under the influence of different
factors being dominant, including tectonic uplift, the limestone structure, and
height of the water table.
Cone karst is often the first stage of karst formation, with solution hollows
developing in wet tropical conditions. During the passage of time these
increase in size, often due to tectonic uplift and vertical erosion from rivers, to
form cockpits.
Where joints are close together, rainwater and the acids it carries can
permeate more effectively, resulting in more weathering of the rock. This may
be the case in the cockpits compared to the cones which may have wider
spaced joints.
Tectonic uplift may be involved in developing cone but not especially tower
karst. As the land rises, the water table falls, and weathering can continue
downwards.
2 Award marks based on the quality of the response using the marking levels
below.
Level 4 (16–20)
Response thoroughly discusses the relative importance of the processes
involved in the formation of different tropical karst landforms. An effective and
sustained evaluation with a sound conclusion. Response is well founded in
detailed exemplar knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the
topic. Examples used are appropriate and integrated effectively into the
response.
Level 3 (11–15)
Response discusses the relative importance of the processes involved in the
formation of different tropical karst landforms. Response is broadly evaluative
in character, comprising some explanatory or narrative content and a
conclusion. Response develops on a largely secure base of knowledge and
understanding with the use of example(s).
Level 2 (6–10)
Response demonstrates some knowledge and understanding of the relative
importance of the processes involved in the formation of different tropical
karst landforms. Response is mainly descriptive or explanatory in approach
and contains a brief or thinly supported evaluation. Responses without the
use of example(s) to support the response will not get above the middle of
Level 2 (8 marks).
Level 1 (1–5)
Response makes a few general points about the relative importance of the
processes involved in the formation of different tropical karst landforms. A
descriptive response comprising a few simple points. Knowledge is basic and
understanding may be poor and lack relevance to the question set.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
Humid tropical climates are typically hot and wet, with maximum temperatures
>20 °C and mean monthly rainfall >50 mm for 8–12 months. Seasonally humid
tropical climates exhibit similar temperatures but different rainfall regimes,
with 1–7 months having a mean >50 mm.
The latitude of humid tropical climates is typically 5–10 °N/S, with a fairly
constant high angle sun giving rise to both high temperatures and
convectional rainfall throughout most of the year. Insolation creates rising air/
zone of low pressure; the air descends to create a zone of high pressure.
Surface winds are the NE and SE trade winds, the Hadley cells are an
important factor in tropical climates.
The equatorial low-pressure zone (ITCZ) moves north and south during the
year, following the movement of the overhead sun. As the ITCZ moves it
takes the low pressure and the related rain belt with it. This has a major
influence on the humid tropical (savanna) climate, determining wet and dry
seasons. As the distance moved by the ITCZ is not the same every year, the
savanna lands closest to the hot deserts have very unreliable rainfall, leading
to occasional droughts. The movement of the ITCZ affects the direction and
track of winds being maritime or continental.
Monsoon climates are also reliant on pressure differences, but the movement
of the ITCZ, the position of the sub-tropical jet stream, and the influence of the
Himalayas (which reach almost to the tropopause) also have an effect.
Altitude has a minor effect. The Andes in Ecuador reduce the temperatures
considerably, making these mountainous areas much cooler than the nearby
Amazon lowlands. In East Africa, the higher altitude of the Kenyan/Ethiopian
highlands, disrupts the normal global pattern, leading to a savanna climate,
not the equatorial climate one would expect. In tropical areas where there are
mountains along the east coast, e.g. Brazil, the mountains make the trade
winds rise, producing heavier rainfall than normal, with a rain-shadow effect
further inland (e.g. the Sertão in Brazil).
Award marks based on the quality of the response using the marking levels
below.
Level 4 (16–20)
Response thoroughly discusses the view that the most important factor
influencing tropical climates is atmospheric pressure. An effective and
sustained evaluation with a sound conclusion. Response is well founded in
detailed exemplar knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the
topic. Examples used are appropriate and integrated effectively into the
response.
Level 3 (11–15)
Response discusses the view that the most important factor influencing
tropical climates is atmospheric pressure. Response is broadly evaluative in
character, comprising some explanatory or narrative content and a
conclusion. Response develops on a largely secure base of knowledge and
understanding with the use of example(s).
Level 2 (6–10)
Response demonstrates some knowledge and understanding of the view that
the most important factor influencing tropical climates is atmospheric
pressure. Response is mainly descriptive or explanatory in approach and
contains a brief or thinly supported evaluation. Responses without the use of
example(s) to support the response will not get above the middle of Level 2 (8
marks).
Level 1 (1–5)
Response makes a few general points about the view that the most important
factor influencing tropical climates is atmospheric pressure. A descriptive
response comprising a few simple points. Knowledge is basic and
understanding may be poor and lack relevance to the question set.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
Coastal environments
4(a) Fig. 4.1 shows erosion rates along a section of a barrier island near 3
Lagos, Nigeria, 2001–13.
4(b) Suggest two reasons for the pattern you described in (a). 7
There are likely to be a number of inter-related reasons for the pattern and the
variable rates of the processes within it. The answer should be related to the
pattern described.
Award marks based on the quality of explanation and breadth of the response
using the marking levels below.
Level 3 (6–7)
Response clearly explains two reasons for the pattern described in (a).
Response is well founded in detailed knowledge and strong conceptual
understanding of the topic. Examples used are appropriate and integrated
effectively into the response.
Level 2 (3–5)
Response explains two reasons or clearly explains one reason (max. 4) for
the pattern described in (a). Response develops on a largely secure base of
knowledge and understanding. Examples may lack detail or development.
Level 1 (1–2)
Response explains one or two reasons for the pattern described in (a).
Knowledge is basic and understanding may be inaccurate. Examples are in
name only or lacking entirely.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
Candidates may conclude that the factors are similar e.g. both require
mudflats for their initial development and that the halophytic nature of both
vegetations is key. The greater resistance of mangroves to higher energy
levels enables them to develop in a wide range of tropical environments,
whilst coastal saltmarshes only develop in low energy environments such as
estuaries, behind spits and barrier islands.
Award marks based on the quality of the response using the marking levels
below.
Level 4 (16–20)
Response thoroughly discusses the relative importance of the factors
influencing the formation of coastal saltmarshes and mangroves. An effective
and sustained evaluation with a sound conclusion. Response is well founded
in detailed exemplar knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the
topic. Examples used are appropriate and integrated effectively into the
response.
Level 3 (11–15)
Response discusses the relative importance of the factors influencing the
formation of coastal saltmarshes and mangroves. Response is broadly
evaluative in character, comprising some explanatory or narrative content and
a conclusion. Response develops on a largely secure base of knowledge and
understanding with the use of example(s).
5 Level 2 (6–10)
Response demonstrates some knowledge and understanding of the relative
importance of the factors influencing the formation of coastal saltmarshes
and/or mangroves. Response is mainly descriptive or explanatory in approach
and contains a brief or thinly supported evaluation. Responses without the
use of example(s) to support the response will not get above the middle of
Level 2 (8 marks).
Level 1 (1–5)
Response makes a few general points about the relative importance of the
factors influencing the formation of coastal saltmarshes and/or mangroves. A
descriptive response comprising a few simple points. Knowledge is basic and
understanding may be poor and lack relevance to the question set.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
Candidates may conclude that all coral reefs develop in similar oceanic
condition, however, their individual characteristics vary due to the different
rates of processes involved and change over time.
6 Award marks based on the quality of the response using the marking levels
below.
Level 4 (16–20)
Response thoroughly discusses the view that the characteristics and
formation of fringing reefs, barrier reefs, and atolls are very different. An
effective and sustained evaluation with a sound conclusion. Response is well
founded in detailed exemplar knowledge and strong conceptual
understanding of the topic. Examples used are appropriate and integrated
effectively into the response.
Level 3 (11–15)
Response discusses the view that the characteristics and formation of fringing
reefs, barrier reefs, and atolls are very different. Response is broadly
evaluative in character, comprising some explanatory or narrative content and
a conclusion. Response develops on a largely secure base of knowledge and
understanding with the use of example(s).
Level 2 (6–10)
Response demonstrates some knowledge and understanding of the view that
the characteristics and formation of fringing reefs, barrier reefs, and atolls are
very different. Response is mainly descriptive or explanatory in approach and
contains a brief or thinly supported evaluation. Responses without the use of
example(s) to support the response will not get above the middle of Level 2 (8
marks).
Level 1 (1–5)
Response makes a few general points about the view that the characteristics
and formation of fringing reefs, barrier reefs, and atolls are very different. A
descriptive response comprising a few simple points. Knowledge is basic and
understanding may be poor and lack relevance to the question set.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
Hazardous environments
7(a) Fig. 7.1 shows pyroclastic flows from Soufrière Hills volcano, 4
Montserrat, on 8 January 2010.
1 mark for each descriptive point. Use of map evidence for maximum marks.
Pyroclastic flows are rapidly moving mixtures of air and gases and very hot
volcanic fragments, usually of ash formed from explosive eruptions at
destructive plate boundaries in highly acidic magma.
Award marks based on the quality of explanation and breadth of the response
using the marking levels below.
Level 3 (5–6)
Response clearly explains how pyroclastic flows are formed. Response is well
founded in detailed knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the
topic. Examples used are appropriate and integrated effectively into the
response.
Level 2 (3–4)
Response explains how pyroclastic flows are formed. Response develops on
a largely secure base of knowledge and understanding. Examples may lack
detail or development.
Level 1 (1–2)
Response describes how pyroclastic flows are formed. Knowledge is basic
and understanding may be inaccurate. Examples are in name only or lacking
entirely.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
High winds cause damage to infrastructure and property; flying debris is also
a hazard. Heavy rain causes river flooding, surface flooding and landslides.
Flooding damages property, drowns people, sweeps cars away, and pollutes
drinking water supplies. Storm (tidal) surges have similar impacts but as they
are saltwater, can inflict longer term damage to soils making farmland infertile.
Landslides can occur suddenly and can destroy properties built on slopes.
Candidates may conclude that impacts are similar from both types of
atmospheric disturbance due to some similarity in the hazards e.g. strong
winds, but that the scale and exact nature of the impacts do very between the
two, influenced by factors such as the level of income of the affected area.
There will also be variation within each type.
8 Award marks based on the quality of the response using the marking levels
below.
Level 4 (16–20)
Response thoroughly discusses the extent to which impacts of hazards
resulting from atmospheric disturbances vary. An effective and sustained
evaluation with a sound conclusion. Response is well founded in detailed
exemplar knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the topic.
Examples used are appropriate and integrated effectively into the response.
Level 3 (11–15)
Response discusses the extent to which impacts of hazards resulting from
atmospheric disturbances vary. Response is broadly evaluative in character,
comprising some explanatory or narrative content and a conclusion.
Response develops on a largely secure base of knowledge and
understanding with the use of example(s).
Level 2 (6–10)
Response demonstrates some knowledge and understanding of the extent to
which impacts of hazards resulting from atmospheric disturbances vary.
Response is mainly descriptive or explanatory in approach and contains a
brief or thinly supported evaluation. Responses without the use of example(s)
to support the response will not get above the middle of Level 2 (8 marks).
Level 1 (1–5)
Response makes a few general points about the extent to which impacts of
hazards resulting from atmospheric disturbances vary. A descriptive response
comprising a few simple points. Knowledge is basic and understanding may
be poor and lack relevance to the question set.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
9 Award marks based on the quality of the response using the marking levels
below.
Level 4 (16–20)
Response thoroughly discusses the problems of sustainable management of
a hazardous environment. An effective and sustained evaluation with a sound
conclusion. Response is well founded in detailed exemplar knowledge and
strong conceptual understanding of the topic. Examples used are appropriate
and integrated effectively into the response.
Level 3 (11–15)
Response discusses the problems of sustainable management of a
hazardous environment. Response is broadly evaluative in character,
comprising some explanatory or narrative content and a conclusion.
Response develops on a largely secure base of knowledge and
understanding with the use of example(s).
Level 2 (6–10)
Response demonstrates some knowledge and understanding of the problems
of sustainable management of a hazardous environment. Response is mainly
descriptive or explanatory in approach and contains a brief or thinly supported
evaluation. Responses without the use of example(s) to support the response
will not get above the middle of Level 2 (8 marks).
Level 1 (1–5)
Response makes a few general points about the problems of sustainable
management of a hazardous environment. A descriptive response comprising
a few simple points. Knowledge is basic and understanding may be poor and
lack relevance to the question set.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
If answering this option, answer Question 10 and either Question 11 or Question 12.
10(a) Fig. 10.1 is a photograph which shows a hot arid landscape in Namibia. 4
With the aid of a labelled diagram, describe the main physical features
of landform A shown in Fig. 10.1.
Candidates should interpret Fig. 10.1 to identify and describe the main
features of landform A. A labelled diagram should be used.
In parabolic dunes similar processes apply but the horns and the dune face in
opposite direction to the wind. They are formed from blowout dunes where the
erosion of vegetated sand leaves a U-shaped depression. The photograph is
a barchan but there may be some confusion.
Award marks based on the quality of explanation and breadth of the response
using the marking levels below.
Level 3 (5–6)
Response clearly explains the formation of landform A shown in Fig. 10.1.
Response is well founded in detailed knowledge and strong conceptual
understanding of the topic. Examples used are appropriate and integrated
effectively into the response.
Level 2 (3–4)
Response explains the formation of landform A shown in Fig. 10.1. Response
develops on a largely secure base of knowledge and understanding.
Examples may lack detail or development.
Level 1 (1–2)
Response describes the formation of landform A shown in Fig. 10.1.
Knowledge is basic and understanding may be inaccurate. Examples are in
name only or lacking entirely.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
If more than one case study, mark all and take the best one.
11 Award marks based on the quality of the response using the marking levels
below.
Level 4 (16–20)
Response thoroughly discusses the solutions to the problems of sustainable
management in either a hot arid or semi-arid environment. An effective and
sustained evaluation with a sound conclusion. Response is well founded in
detailed exemplar knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the
topic. Examples used are appropriate and integrated effectively into the
response.
Level 3 (11–15)
Response discusses the solutions to the problems of sustainable
management in either a hot arid or semi-arid environment. Response is
broadly evaluative in character, comprising some explanatory or narrative
content and a conclusion. Response develops on a largely secure base of
knowledge and understanding with the use of example(s).
Level 2 (6–10)
Response demonstrates some knowledge and understanding of the solutions
to the problems of sustainable management in either a hot arid or semi-arid
environment. Response is mainly descriptive or explanatory in approach and
contains a brief or thinly supported evaluation. Responses without the use of
example(s) to support the response will not get above the middle of Level 2 (8
marks).
Level 1 (1–5)
Response makes a few general points about the solutions to the problems of
sustainable management in either a hot arid or semi-arid environment. A
descriptive response comprising a few simple points. Knowledge is basic and
understanding may be poor and lack relevance to the question set.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
12 Assess the extent to which aridity is caused by the rain shadow effect. 20
Causes include:
Rain shadow effect – creating aridity in the lee of relief barriers. Air rises,
cools and condenses causing precipitation on the windward side. As air
descends on the leeward side, it is already drier, and warms further
reducing relative humidity
Cold ocean currents – which limit evaporation and cause relatively dry air
to blow onto the land
Descending air of the Hadley Cell – creating sub-tropical high pressure
and a lack of rising/cooling air to cause condensation
Continentality – with limited availability of moisture due to long distances
from the moisture sources provided by oceans
Candidates may conclude that the rain shadow effect, as with cold ocean
currents, is a local factor causing aridity whereas the Hadley Cell and
continentality are more global scale causes.
Award marks based on the quality of the response using the marking levels
below.
Level 4 (16–20)
Response thoroughly discusses the extent to which aridity is caused by the
rain shadow effect. An effective and sustained evaluation with a sound
conclusion. Response is well founded in detailed exemplar knowledge and
strong conceptual understanding of the topic. Examples used are appropriate
and integrated effectively into the response.
Level 3 (11–15)
Response discusses the extent to which aridity is caused by the rain shadow
effect. Response is broadly evaluative in character, comprising some
explanatory or narrative content and a conclusion. Response develops on a
largely secure base of knowledge and understanding with the use of
example(s).
Level 2 (6–10)
Response demonstrates some knowledge and understanding of the extent to
which aridity is caused by the rain shadow effect. Response is mainly
descriptive or explanatory in approach and contains a brief or thinly supported
evaluation. Responses without the use of example(s) to support the response
will not get above the middle of Level 2 (8 marks).
Level 1 (1–5)
Response makes a few general points about the extent to which aridity is
caused by the rain shadow effect. A descriptive response comprising a few
simple points. Knowledge is basic and understanding may be poor and lack
relevance to the question set.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.