Scribd
Upload
29 views

SIP-APPRAISAL TOOL

The document is a School Improvement Plan (SIP) Appraisal Tool for the Republic of the Philippines' Department of Education, designed to evaluate various components of a school's planning process. It includes criteria for assessing the organization of the School Planning Team, the presence of required documents, and the alignment of the improvement plan with the Department's Vision, Mission, and Core Values. The tool also covers governance, monitoring and evaluation, and includes a checklist for annexes that must be submitted with the plan.

Uploaded by

Nixon Jhon Parchamento
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
29 views

SIP-APPRAISAL TOOL

The document is a School Improvement Plan (SIP) Appraisal Tool for the Republic of the Philippines' Department of Education, designed to evaluate various components of a school's planning process. It includes criteria for assessing the organization of the School Planning Team, the presence of required documents, and the alignment of the improvement plan with the Department's Vision, Mission, and Core Values. The tool also covers governance, monitoring and evaluation, and includes a checklist for annexes that must be submitted with the plan.

Uploaded by

Nixon Jhon Parchamento
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
San Guillermo District

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (SIP) APPRAISAL TOOL

School ID: ___________School Name: ___________________________________________ Date Submitted:

School Head: __________________________________District: ______________________Contact No.:

Observed
Description Criteria Pre- Final Comment/Observation
Appraisal Review
Endorsement Letter Is there an organized School Planning Team composed of  YES  YES
but not limited to the School Head, Teachers  NO  NO
Representative, Parents Representative, Students and
Brgy. or LGU Representatives indicating their signatures in
the endorsement letter in a suggested format?
Approval Sheet Is there an approval sheet in a suggested format?  YES  YES
 NO  NO
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Executive Summary Is there an executive summary of the over-all conduct of the  YES  YES
Planning Process, including the discussion of but not limited  NO  NO
to the legal bases, its purpose and the planning process?
INTRODUCTION
A. Vision, Mission and Core Are the DepEd Vision, Mission and Core Values stated?  YES  YES
Values  NO  NO

B. School Situation Is there a complete, logical and concise presentation of


school situation based on the assessment of the following:
a. current status of children
b. status and trends in the realization of the school’s  YES  YES
contributions to the achievement of the Division Goals  NO  NO
and Objectives
c. school systems and processes that facilitate and hinder  YES  YES
the attainment of school objectives and targets  NO  NO

 YES  YES
 NO  NO

K to 12 (PRIORITY IMPROVEMENT AREAS) (Only applicable learning stage(s) to the school should be included)
K to Grade 3 Is there a logical narrative discussion of the school’s  YES  YES
Grade 4 to 6 prioritization of the most pressing needs or problems that  NO  NO
Grade 7 to 10 surfaced in school and learners data that contributes to the
Grade 11 to 12 school’s intermediate outcomes for Access and Quality?
(discussion for each learning
stage)

Are the priority areas clearly stated with an evident linkage  YES  YES
to with an evident linkage to the Department’s Vision,  NO  NO
Mission and Core Values?

Are the priority areas directed towards improving school  YES  YES
effectiveness?  NO  NO
Resilience

GOVERNANCE
Governance Is there a logical narrative discussion of the school’s  YES  YES
prioritization of the most pressing needs or problems that  NO  NO
are school governance-related and contribute to the
organization’s governance intermediate outcomes?
MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Content Is the Monitoring and Evaluation Plan comprehensive and  YES  YES
complete?  NO  NO
Validity and Feasibility Is the Monitoring and Evaluation Plan technically and  YES  YES
managerially feasible?  NO  NO
IMPROVEMENT PLAN ( 6 YEARS )

1|Page: SIP APPRAISAL TOOL


Content Is the required detailed content (as suggested by the  YES  YES
format) provided for the plan and is aligned with all other  NO  NO
related documents?
Validity and Feasibility Is the plan technically, financially, and managerially feasible  YES  YES
and sustainable?  NO  NO
ANNEXES
Are the following Annexes School-Community Data Profile  YES  YES
included with complete and  NO  NO
concise data and used Child Mapping Tool  YES  YES
proper template?  NO  NO
Child-friendly School Survey  YES  YES
 NO  NO

Child Protection Policy Implementation Checklist  YES  YES


 NO  NO
Student-Led School Watching  YES  YES
 NO  NO
Gap Analysis  YES  YES
 NO  NO
Priority Improvement Areas  YES  YES
 NO  NO
Planning Worksheet  YES  YES
 NO  NO
School Process  YES  YES
 NO  NO
Root Cause Analysis  YES  YES
 NO  NO
Project Work Plans and Budget Matrices  YES  YES
 NO  NO
School Report Card (SRC) Summary of Information  YES  YES
 NO  NO

School Report Card (SRC)  YES  YES


 NO  NO
Action Taken: Pre-Appraisal: Date: ______________ Final Review: Date: ______________
(please check appropriate  For final review  For recommending approval
box)  Return to proponent for enhancements based on  For recommending approval but need to incorporate
comments/suggestions suggestions to enhance the plan
 Return to proponent for enhancements
Comments: ____________________________ Comments: ____________________________
______________________________________ ______________________________________

CONFORMED BY:

_____________________________________
School Head

PRE-APPRAISED BY:
_____________________________________ _____________________________________
TWG TEAM TWG TEAM

REVIEWED BY:

___________________________________
Public Schools District Supervisor

2|Page: SIP APPRAISAL TOOL

You might also like