0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views2 pages

DLD - Rubrics

The document outlines the assessment rubrics for the Digital Logic Design lab course (CPEN-2220), focusing on evaluating students' abilities in conducting experiments, teamwork, and data analysis. It specifies performance levels from 'exceeds expectation' to 'does not meet expectation' across various outcomes, including knowledge of the subject, experiment realization, and laboratory safety. The evaluation method includes lab report assessments and instructor observations during lab sessions.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views2 pages

DLD - Rubrics

The document outlines the assessment rubrics for the Digital Logic Design lab course (CPEN-2220), focusing on evaluating students' abilities in conducting experiments, teamwork, and data analysis. It specifies performance levels from 'exceeds expectation' to 'does not meet expectation' across various outcomes, including knowledge of the subject, experiment realization, and laboratory safety. The evaluation method includes lab report assessments and instructor observations during lab sessions.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

OUTCOMES (write a brief on the lab)

Assessment Rubrics for:


Digital Logic Design (CPEN-2220)
Method:
Lab report evaluation and instructor observation during lab sessions.
Outcomes Assessed:
a. Ability to conduct experiments as well as to analyze and interpret data.
b. Ability to function in a team and adhere to rules and guidelines.
c. Ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.
d. Knowledge of the subject.
Performance Exceeds expectation (5-4) Meets expectation (3-2) Does not meet expectation (1) Marks
Knowledge of
Shows proficient understanding Shows basic understanding Failed to show understanding of
subject matter
of the subject matter of the subject matter the subject matter
(d)
Selects relevant equipment / Needs guidance to select Incapable of selecting relevant
Realization of parts to the experiment, relevant equipment / parts to equipment / parts to the
experiment (a) develops circuit diagrams of the experiment and to experiment and unable to
part connections or wiring develop setup diagrams develop setup diagrams
Actively engages and
Cooperates with other group Distracts or discourages other
cooperates with other group
Teamwork (b) members in a reasonable group members from conducting
members in an effective
manner the experiments
manner
Connects circuit components Connects circuit parts, sets
Conducting properly, sets input signals input states according to the Unable to connect circuits parts,
experiment (a, according to the requirement of requirement of experiment and perform the procedure of
c) experiment and examines the and examines the output experiment
output meticulously with minor error
Observes lab safety rules;
Laboratory
handles the equipment and Observes safety rules and
safety and Disregards lab safety and
components with care and disciplinary guidelines with
disciplinary disciplinary rules
adheres to the lab disciplinary minor deviations
rules (b)
guidelines aptly
Completes data collection from
the experiment setup by giving Completes data collection Fails at collecting data by giving
proper input signals and with minor error and enters proper inputs and observing
Data
observing the outputs, ensures data in lab manual with output states of experiment
collection (c)
that the data is entered in the slight deviation from setup, unable to fill the lab
lab manual according to the guidelines manual properly
specified instructions
Analyzes the data obtained
Analyzes data with minor
from experiment thoroughly Unable to establish the
error and correlates it with
and accurately verifies it with relationship between practical
Data analysis theoretical values
theoretical understanding, and theoretical values and lacks
(a, c) reasonably. Attempts to
accounts for any discrepancy in the theoretical understanding to
account for any discrepancy
data from theory with sound explain any discrepancy in data
in data from theory
explanation
Uses NI Multisim, Logisim
Unable to launch and operate the
Computer use Operate the NI Multisim, interfaces of digital
on-PC NI Multisim, Logisim
(c) Logisim with little to no help instruments with guidance
with or without assistance
from instructor
Total (40)

Lab Engineer:

Name: ___________________________

Signature: ________________________

You might also like