0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views4 pages

Understanding the Complementizer THAT

The document discusses the role of the complementizer 'that' in introducing complement clauses, highlighting its syntactic function as a marker of subordination without inherent meaning. It explains the transformations and distribution of 'that' clauses, including their use as direct objects, subjects, and attributes in various verb constructions. Additionally, it addresses the behavior of 'that' in relation to extraposition and the subcategorization of verbs that govern clausal complements.

Uploaded by

maramaria870
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views4 pages

Understanding the Complementizer THAT

The document discusses the role of the complementizer 'that' in introducing complement clauses, highlighting its syntactic function as a marker of subordination without inherent meaning. It explains the transformations and distribution of 'that' clauses, including their use as direct objects, subjects, and attributes in various verb constructions. Additionally, it addresses the behavior of 'that' in relation to extraposition and the subcategorization of verbs that govern clausal complements.

Uploaded by

maramaria870
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

The Complementizer THAT

The formative that which introduces complement clauses is traditionally considered a


subordinating conjunction. In fact, that is a marker of subordination. Unlike other
subordinating conjunctions (though, if), that has no meaning, occasionally being deleted.
That is a purely syntactic word, showing embedding, hence its name complementizer.
The lexical category of complementizers groups morphemes that have the same syntactic
functions: that, for-to, Poss- ing, Acc-ing, as.
Complementizers are sensitive to functions that can occur in Object and Subject Clauses: for-
to can occur only in Subject clauses:
[That John eats cabbage] means [that he likes it]. (That Cl/ Subj)
*For him to eat cabbage means that he will be sick.
[For him to eat cabbage] means nothing. (For-to Cl/ Subj)

Such interdependencies are easily expressed in terms of subcategorization frames for a


certain verb, which are an obligatory component of the lexic.
The generation of the complete range of That complements acquires the formulation of
several very general transformations:
Extraposition – converts sentence A into sentence B
a) That the world is round is obvious.
b. It is obvious that the world is round.
This rule is an optional one, not lexically governed, but obligatory for some verbs: seem,
appear, happen, turn out.
*That the world is round seems/ appears/ happens
It seems/ appears/ happens that the world is round.
A limited number of highly frequent verbs appear to require obligatory extraposition. This is
the case they don’t allow sentential subjects:
*That he is smart seems.
*To him to be smart seems.
But these verbs allow another type of constructions based on Raising Subject to Subject
position, which is a transformation that applies after extraposition and it insertion.
*That he is smart seems. =>> extraposition + it insertion =>>
It seems that he is smart. =>> Raising =>> He seems to be smart.
Extraposition also appears to behave exceptionally with respect to subject and object
complements of so-called bisentential verbs like: prove, show, indicate, imply, suggest,
mean, entail etc.
These verbs accept sentential constituents as both subject and object:
[That his finger-prints were on my throat] shows/ suggests/ proves/ means/ implies [that he is
unfond of me.]
*It shows [that he is unfond of me] [that his finger-prints were on my throat.]

The Distribution of That – Clauses


That – Clauses as Direct Objects
The following transitive verbs are subcategorized for clausal DOs introduced by that: admit,
answer, arrange, assume, believe, claim, consider, doubt, dream, estimate, fancy, find, feel,
hear, guess, imagine, mean, mind, know, prove, realize, remember, regret, see, suppose,
respect, think, understand.
Passive can freely apply to D.O complement clauses, in most cases the clausal subject is
extraposed:
The police already know that Oliver is a spy.
That Oliver is a spy is already known by the police.
It is already known by the police that Oliver is a spy.

With some verbs like: think, believe, imagine, suppose, see, hear, know, remember,
understand, that – deletion applies: I think/ suppose (that) he will come in time.
There is a second subcategory of verbs which take, in addition to a clausal D.O, an I.O or
P.O.
Verbs that take a to I.O.: they are mostly communicative verbs, which may undergo Dative
Movement: tell, read, write, suggest, remark, represent. Other verbs: permit, allow, promise,
swear, indicate.
She promised him that she’d never lie to him again.
They telegraphed us that father had died.
The Clausal D.O. may be passivized before Dative Movement:
They suggested a good solution to us.
A good solution was suggested to us by them.
In addition to the subclass of Dative Movement verbs, there are verbs that take a clausal D.O
and a personal P.O: ask, blame, beg, request, require:
He blamed the accident on me.
He blamed it on me that we had had an accident.
I begged of them that I may be allowed to go.
That – clauses often represent underlying prepositional Objects, which undergo Preposition
Deletion: admit (of), ask (for), answer (for), marvel (at), see (to), worry (about), wonder (at,
about), swear (to), conceive (of), decide (on), insist (up/ on), hope (for), learn (of, about).
Can you swear that the accused man was at your home all Friday night?
They voted that he should be admitted.
There is a class of transitive verbs that govern a D.O and a Prep. Object, where the Prep.
Object alternates with the clause:

advise^NP^of, instruct^NP^in, warn^NP^of, accuse ^NP^of, inform^NP^of, persuade^NP^of


He informed the manager that we are willing to work overtime.
Most frequently, That clauses originate in a prepositional phrase governed by an adjective:
afraid (of), alarmed (at), annoyed (at), concerned (about), happy (about), delighted (at),
sorry (for), thankful (for), surprised (at):
Are you aware that you are sitting on my hat?
You should be thankful that you are alive.
That-Clauses as Subjects with several predicate subclasses: seem, appear, happen, turn out,
came about.
It appeared that I had run out of whiskey again.
It seemed she had simply forgotten about Georgie.
Some of these verbs may also take a [+personal] I.O.
He felt a new respect for Miss Carter, and it occurred to him for the first time that he liked
her.
A considerable number of adjectives take sentential subjects: likely, contain, true, possible,
doubtful, helpful, essential, evident.
It was also evident to me [that I had not yet accepted] [that I lost her].
Nouns can also be used in this pattern: problem, thing, idea, fact, miracle, wonder, illusion.
It is a wonder that you were not killed.
There is a large number of psychological transitive verbs that allow sentence subjects: alarm,
amaze, concern, please, satisfy, tempt, trouble.

I was pleased that they had recognized my work.


That nothing came out of it intrigues me.
That – Clauses may also function as predicative in equative sentences when the subject is a
non-complex abstract NP or a clause: fact, idea, reason, claim, trouble etc.
The devil of it was [that I needed both of them].
Indications were that Spain and Morocco had come close to an agreement.

That – Clauses as Attributes


I have an uneasy feeling that she is forgotten.

You might also like