Chap 7 - Competitive forces (Notes)
Chap 7 - Competitive forces (Notes)
Companies in the same industry might not compete because they operate in different markets.
Example:
Customer Company 1 Company 2
Soft drinks consumers Highlands drinks sell their soft- Gourmet sell their soft-drinks in
drinks in African market Pakistan
Customer Company 1 Company 2
travelers Ferry companies operating Ferry companies operating
passenger services between the UK passenger services between the
and France Greek islands
1.3 Convergence
Occasionally, two or more industries or industrial segments converge, and become part of the same industry,
with the same customer markets. When convergence is happening, or might happen in the future, this can have
a major impact on business strategy.
▪ Demand led convergence – With demand-led convergence, the pressure for industry convergence comes
from customers. Customers begin to think of two or more products as interchangeable or closely
complementary.
▪ Supply led convergence – With supply-led convergence, suppliers see a link between different industries and
decide to bridge the gap between the industries. The convergence of the entertainment, voice
communication and data communication industries, discussed in the previous example, is probably supply-
led, because suppliers became aware of the technological possibilities before consumers became aware of the
convenience.
Example:
PTCL has now merged television broadcasting, telephone services and internet services all of which once used to
be separate industries.
Porter’s Five Forces model provides a framework for analysing the strength of competition in a market. It is not a
model for analysing individual competitors, or even what differentiates the performance of different firms in
the same market. In other words, it is not used to assess why some firms perform better than others.
In addition, the Five Forces model can be used to explain why some industries are more profitable than others,
so that companies operating in one industry are able to make bigger profits than companies operating in another
industry.
Profitability is affected by the strength of competition: the stronger the competition, the lower the profits.
Porters’ five forces are:
1. threats from potential entrants
2. threats from substitute products or services
3. the bargaining power of suppliers
4. the bargaining power of customers
5. competitive rivalry within the industry or market.
When competition in an industry or market is strong, firms must supply their products or services at a
competitive price, and cannot charge excessive prices and make ‘supernormal’ profits. If they do not charge the
lowest prices, firms must compete by offering products that provide extra value to customers, such as higher
quality or faster delivery.
When any of the five forces are strong, competition in the market is likely to be strong and profitability will
therefore be low. Analysing the five forces in a market might therefore help strategic managers to choose the
markets and industries for their firm to operate in.
Entry barriers
A number of factors might help to create high barriers to entry:
a) Economies of scale. Economies of scale are reductions in average costs that are achieved by producing and
selling an item in larger quantities. In an industry where economies of scale are large, and the biggest firms can
achieve substantially lower costs than smaller producers, it is much more difficult for a new firm to enter the
market. This is because it will not be big enough at first to achieve the economies of scale, and its average
costs will therefore be higher than those of the existing large-scale producers.
b) Capital investment requirements. If a new entrant to the market will have to make a large investment in
assets, this will act as a barrier to entry, and deter firms from entering the market when they do not want the
investment risk.
c) Access to distribution channels. In some markets, there are only a limited number of distribution outlets
or distribution channels. If a new entrant will have difficulty in gaining access to any of these distribution
channels, the barriers to entry will be high.
d) Time to become established. In industries where customers attach great importance to branding, such as the
fashion industry, it can take a long time for a new entrant to become well established in the market. When it takes
time to become established, the costs of entry are high.
e) Know-how. This can be time-consuming and expensive for a new entrant to acquire
f) Switching costs. Switching costs are the costs that a buyer has to incur in switching from one supplier to a
new supplier. In some industries, switching costs might be high. For example, the costs for a company of
switching from one audit firm to another might be quite high, and deter a company from wanting to change
its auditors. When switching costs are high, it can be difficult for new entrants to break into a market.
g) Government regulation. Regulations within an industry, or the granting of rights, can make it difficult for
new entrants to break into a market. For example, it might be necessary to obtain a license to operate, or to
become registered in order to operate within an industry.
▪ When the supplier’s product is an important component in the end-products that are made with it (e.g.
supply of engine is more important than supply of car mirrors for car manufacturers)
▪ When the industry (under discussion) is not an important customer for the suppliers
▪ When the suppliers could easily integrate forward, and enter the market as competitors of their existing
customers.
Threat from substitutes. There are no substitutes for legal services, except perhaps for some ‘do-it-yourself’
legal work.
Competitive rivalry. This is likely to be very weak. Firms of competitors will not usually seek to compete with
other firms by offering lower fees.
The conclusion is that competition in the market for legal services in a local region is very weak.
Example: Five forces – CDs and DVDs
The Five Forces model can be used to analyse the competition for Amazon, the company that supplies books,
CDs and DVDs through online ordering on its website. It has no direct competitor.
Threat from potential entrants. This is likely to be fairly low, because of the costs of establishing a selling
and distribution system and the time it might take a new competitor to create ‘brand awareness’.
Suppliers’ bargaining power. Amazon obtains its books and other products from a large number of
different suppliers. The bargaining power of most suppliers is therefore likely to be weak, with suppliers
needing Amazon more than Amazon needs individual suppliers.
Customers’ bargaining power. Amazon has a very large customer base, and the bargaining power of
customers is non-existent.
Threat from substitutes. Substitutes are bookshops, shops selling CDs and DVDs, internet downloads of
films and music, and possibly eBay and other online auction sites as a channel for selling second-hand books.
In the longer term electronic books might be another substitute.
Competitive rivalry. Amazon has no direct competitor.
In conclusion, the major competition in the market served by Amazon is probably the threat from substitute
products.
Decline phase. Eventually, total annual sales in the market will start to fall. As sales fall, so do profits. This leads
to companies leaving the market, which continues until it is no longer possible for any company to turn a profit
from the product. When the last supplier exits the market the product lifecycle is complete.
A ‘classical’ product life cycle is shown in the following diagram.
Not all products have a classical life cycle. Unsuccessful products never become profitable. A business entity
might be able to ‘revitalise’ and redesign a product, so that when it enters a decline phase, its sales can be
increased again, and it goes into another period of growth and maturity.
The length of a product life cycle can be long or short. A broad type of product, such as a motor car, has a longer
life cycle than particular types of the product, such as a Volkswagen Beetle or a Ford Escort.
At each phase of a product’s life cycle:
selling prices will be altered
costs may differ
the amount invested (capital investment) may vary
spending on advertising and other marketing activities may change.
Stage Costs
Product R&D costs
development Capital expenditure decisions
Introduction to Manufacturing costs (high costs due to lack of economies of scale)
the market Operating costs including marketing and advertisement costs
Set up and expansion of distribution channels
Growth Costs of increasing capacity
Increased costs of working capital
Maturity Maintenance and operating costs
Marketing and product enhancement costs to extend maturity
Decline Maintenance and operating costs
Costs to keep sales (e.g. discounts)
Withdrawal Asset decommissioning costs
Possible restructuring costs
Remaining warranties to be supported
Companies are unlikely to enter a market during the maturity phase unless they see growth opportunities
in a particular part of the market, or unless the costs of entry into the market are low.
A company might need to make a strategic decision about leaving a market, when the product is in its decline
phase. It should be possible to make profits in a declining market, but better growth opportunities might exist
in other markets and a company might benefit from a change in its strategic direction.
A typical cycle of competition affects prices and quality. If one company has a large share of a profitable market,
a rival company might start to sell its product at a lower price. Another rival company might improve the quality
of its product, but sell it at the same price as rivals in the market. The first company might respond to these
initiatives by its rivals by improving its product quality and reducing the selling price.
The effect of a cycle of competition in a growing market is that prices fall and quality might improve.
In the maturity phase of a product’s life cycle, or in the decline phase, it becomes more difficult to lower prices
without reducing quality. Competitors might try to gain a bigger share of the market by selling at a lower price,
but the product quality might be reduced. This can lead to a ‘spiral’ of falling prices and falling quality, to the
point where the product is no longer profitable, and it is less attractive to customers.
Example
Glory is a series of high-end smartphones and tablets designed, manufactured and marketed by Marvel Group
(MG). MG is highly regarded for innovative product designs and aggressive marketing campaigns. The mobile
phone industry is one of the fastest growing sectors of economy where a number of competitors attempt to
outperform each other in terms of product designs, features and pricing.
MG is in the process of introducing new series of foldable smartphones (Glory Ultimate) that could be a vital
breakthrough in mobile phone industry. The management of MG intends to adopt life cycle costing for Glory
Ultimate.
Required:
a) Discuss the benefits that MG may enjoy by adopting life cycle costing.
b) List the costs that MG might have to incur in each phase of the life cycle of Glory Ultimate.
c) Suggest the strategies that MG may adopt to extend the maturity phase of Glory Ultimate.
Solution:
a) MG may enjoy the following benefits by adopting life cycle costing:
The potential profitability of Glory Ultimate would be assessed before major development is carried out
and further costs are committed. It may assist management in deciding whether to introduce new series
at all or not.
It may assist in identifying various types of costs over the life of Ultimate Glory.
Strategies may then be devised to reduce / control these costs.
It may assist in developing a pricing strategy that would cover the costs and achieve desired level of profits.
b) MG might have to incur following costs in each phase of the life cycle of Glory Ultimate:
i. Introductory phase
Manufacturing costs (costs of operations)
Marketing and advertising costs to raise product awareness
individually. However, when there are many competitors in the industry, it can simplify the analysis to put
them into strategic groups of entities with similar resources and similar strategies. For the purpose of
competitor analysis, all the entities in the same strategic group can then be treated as if they are a single
competitor. Instead of analysing each competitor individually, they can be analysed collectively, in groups.
Example: Manufacturing industry
Companies in a manufacturing industry might be grouped according to their strategic priorities. Three strategic
groups might be identified:
Companies that seek to maintain their position in the market
Companies that seek to innovate and develop new products
Companies that consider marketing to be the key to strategic success. The strategic priorities of the
companies in each group might differ as follows.
Note: A lead time is the time between a customer placing an order and delivering the product to the customer.
When the strategic objective is a short lead time, the aim is to deliver the product as quickly as possible after a
customer has ordered it.
Dependable delivery means being able to state when and where a product will be delivered to the customer and
meeting this promise.
The main concerns of all manufacturing companies are broadly similar, but their priorities differ. This means that
their strategies are likely to be different, as companies in each strategic group pursue their own priorities.
The strategic groups in a market might be mapped according to price and quality as follows:
This map indicates that there are four strategic groups, each in a different market position in relation to price
and quality. The largest group, Group 2, sells products with a middle-range price and middle-range quality.
This method of analysis can help an entity to identify possible gaps in the market – strategic space. When there
is a perceived gap in the market, an entity might decide on a strategy of filling the empty space by offering a
product with the characteristics that are needed to fill the gap.
If the positioning of entities in a market is analysed by price and quality, as above, possible strategic spaces
might be identified as follows:
In this example, an entity might decide to target a position in the market where it sells a high-quality product
for a low price, because there are no firms yet in this part of the market. Alternatively, there might be a market
for even higher-quality products at an even higher price. The entity might even decide to fill the gap between
Group 1 and Group 2.
This form of market segmentation can be useful for certain products and services such as:
holidays
motor cars
some food and drink products
entertainment products.
This analysis suggests that there are possibly gaps in the market for a product, and that a product is not
currently being made and sold that might appeal specifically to individuals whose children have left home or to
individuals who have retired from working.
Having analysed the market and identified these strategic spaces, management can go on to assess whether a
strategy based on developing an amended product specifically for these gaps in the market might be strategically
desirable and financially worthwhile.
Identifying gaps in a market can be a particularly useful method of competition analysis for companies that are
considering whether or not to enter into a market for the first time.
Notes
Market growth. The mid-point of the growth side of the matrix is often set at 10% per year. If market growth is
higher than this, it is ‘high’ and if annual growth is lower, it is ‘low’. It should be said that 10% is an arbitrary
figure.
Market share is usually measured as the annual sales for a particular product or business unit as a proportion
of the total annual market sales. For example, if the product of Entity X has annual sales of Rs. 100,000 and total
annual sales for the market as a whole are Rs. 1,000,000; Entity X has a 10% market share.
In the BCG matrix, however, market share is measured as annual sales for the product as a percentage or ratio of
the annual sales of the biggest competitor in the market. The mid-point of this side of the matrix represents a
situation where the sales for the firm’s product or business unit are equal to the annual sales of its biggest
competitor. If a product or business unit is the market leader, it has a ‘high’ relative market share. If a product is
not the market leader, its relative market share is ‘low’.
The BCG matrix is shown as follows. The individual products or business units of the firm can be plotted on the
matrix as a circle. The size of the circle shows the relative money value of sales for the product. A large circle
therefore represents a product with large annual sales.
BCG matrix
The products or business units are categorised according to which of the four quadrants it is in. The four
categories of product (or business unit) are:
Question mark (also called ‘problem child’)
Star
Cash cow
Dog.
Question mark
A question mark is a product with a relatively low market share in a high-growth market. Since the market is
growing quickly, there is an opportunity to increase market share, but initially it will require a substantial
investment of cash to increase or even maintain market share.
A strategic decision that needs to be taken is whether to invest more heavily to increase market share in a
growing market, whether to seek a profitable position in the market, but not as market leader, or whether to
withdraw from the market because the cash flows from the product are negative.
Star
A star has a high relative market share in a high-growth market. It is the market leader. However, a considerable
investment of cash is still required to maintain its leading position. Initially, they probably use up more cash than
they earn, and at best are cash-neutral. Over time, stars should gradually become self-financing. At some stage in
the future, they should start to earn high returns.
Cash cow
A cash cow is a product in a market where market growth is lower, and possibly even negative. It has a high
relative market share, and is the market leader. It should be earning substantial net cash inflows, because it has
high economies of scale and will have become efficient through experience. Other companies will not mount an
attack as they perceive that the market is old and near decline.
Cash cows should be providing the business entity with the cash that it needs to invest in question marks and
stars.
Dog
A dog is a product in a low-growth market that is not the market leader. It is unlikely that the product will gain a
larger market share, because the market leader will defend the position of its cash cow. A dog might be losing
money, and using up more cash than it earns. If so, it should be evaluated for potential closure.
However, a dog may be providing positive cash flows. Although the entity has a relatively small market share in
a low-growth market (or declining market), the product may be profitable. A strategic decision for the entity may
be to choose between immediate withdrawal from the market (and perhaps selling the business to a buyer, for
example in a management buyout) or enjoying the cash flows for a few more years before eventually
withdrawing from the market.
It would be an unwise decision, however, to invest more capital in ‘dogs’, in the hope of increasing market share
and improving cash flows, because gaining market share in a low-growth market is very difficult to achieve.
Summary