FINANCIAL DISTRESS ANALYSIS notes
FINANCIAL DISTRESS ANALYSIS notes
a) Inventory Turnover
It measures the number of times inventory turned over or was converted to sales during a time
period. It may also be called the Cost of Sales to Inventory Ratio. It is a good indication of
purchasing and production efficiency. In general, the higher the ratio, the more frequently the
inventory turned over. You might expect a company with a perishable inventory, such as a grocery
store, to have a very high Inventory Turnover Ratio. Conversely, a furniture store might have a
low Inventory Turnover Ratio
- Formula: Cost of Goods Sold / Average Inventory
- Example:
Company G: COGS = $50,000,000, Average Inventory = $10,000,000
Inventory Turnover = 50,000,000 / 10,000,000 = 5 times per year
b) Accounts Receivable Turnover
The Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio measures the number of time accounts receivable turned
over during a time period. A higher ratio indicates a shorter time between making a sale and
collecting the cash.
- Formula: Net Credit Sales / Net Accounts Receivable
- Example:
Company H: Net Credit Sales = $80,000,000, Average A/R = $20,000,000
A/R Turnover = 80,000,000 / 20,000,000 = 4 times per year
A numerical measurement used to predict the chances of a business going bankrupt in the next two
years.
The Z-score model is based on five key financial ratios. It increases the model’s accuracy when
measuring the financial health of a company and its probability of going bankrupt.
Where:
Interpretation:
- Z > 2.99: "Safe" Zone
- 1.81 < Z < 2.99: "Gray" Zone
- Z < 1.81: "Distress" Zone
Usually, the lower the Z-score, the higher the odds that a company is heading for bankruptcy. A
Z-score that is lower than 1.8 means that the company is in financial distress and with a high
probability of going bankrupt. On the other hand, a score of 3 and above means that the company
is in a safe zone and is unlikely to file for bankruptcy. A score of between 1.8 and 3 means that
the company is in a grey area and with a moderate chance of filing for bankruptcy.
Investors use Altman’s Z-score to make a decision on whether to buy or sell a company’s stock,
depending on the assessed financial strength. If a company shows a Z-score closer to 3, investors
may consider purchasing the company’s stock since there is minimal risk of the business going
bankrupt in the next two years.
However, if a company shows a Z-score closer to 1.8, the investors may consider selling the
company’s stock to avoid losing their investments since the score implies a high probability of
going bankrupt.
The following are the key financial ratios that make up the Z-score model:
Working capital is the difference between the current assets of a company and its current liabilities.
The value of a company’s working capital determines its short-term financial health. A positive
working capital means that a company can meet its short-term financial obligations and still make
funds available to invest and grow.
In contrast, negative working capital means that a company will struggle to meet its short-term
financial obligations because there are inadequate current assets.
The retained earnings/total assets ratio shows the amount of retained earnings or losses in a
company. If a company reports a low retained earnings to total assets ratio, it means that it is
financing its expenditure using borrowed funds rather than funds from its retained earnings. It
increases the probability of a company going bankrupt.
On the other hand, a high retained earnings to total assets ratio shows that a company uses its
retained earnings to fund capital expenditure. It shows that the company achieved profitability over
the years, and it does not need to rely on borrowings.
The market value, also known as market capitalization, is the value of a company’s equity. It is
obtained by multiplying the number of outstanding shares by the current price of stocks.
The market value of the equity/total liabilities ratio shows the degree to which a company’s market
value would decline when it declares bankruptcy before the value of liabilities exceeds the value
of assets on the balance sheet. A high market value of equity to total liabilities ratio can be
interpreted to mean high investor confidence in the company’s financial strength.
5. Sales/Total Assets
The sales to total assets ratio shows how efficiently the management uses assets to generate
revenues vis-à-vis the competition. A high sales to total assets ratio is translated to mean that the
management requires a small investment to generate sales, which increases the overall profitability
of the company.
In contrast, a low or falling sales to total assets ratio means that the management will need to use
more resources to generate enough sales, which will reduce the company’s profitability.
Example:
Company X has the following data:
- Working Capital = $10M
- Total Assets = $100M
- Retained Earnings = $20M
- EBIT = $15M
- Market Value of Equity = $80M
- Total Liabilities = $50M
- Sales = $120M
Calculation:
A = 10/100 = 0.1
B = 20/100 = 0.2
C = 15/100 = 0.15
D = 80/50 = 1.6
E = 120/100 = 1.2
Formula:
S = 1.03A + 3.07B + 0.66C + 0.4D
Where:
- A = Working Capital / Total Assets
- B = Net Profit before Interest and Taxes / Total Assets
- C = Net Profit before Taxes / Current Liabilities
- D = Sales / Total Assets
Interpretation:
- S < 0.862: High probability of financial distress
- S > 0.862: Low probability of financial distress
c) Zmijewski Model
Developed by Mark E. Zmijewski in 1984, this model uses three financial ratios to predict
bankruptcy.
Formula:
X = -4.3 - 4.5A + 5.7B - 0.004C
Where:
- A = Net Income / Total Assets
- B = Total Liabilities / Total Assets
- C = Current Assets / Current Liabilities
Interpretation:
- If X > 0.5, the company is likely to go bankrupt
- If X < 0.5, the company is unlikely to go bankrupt
Calculations:
1. Current Ratio = 2B / 4B = 0.5 (Well below the ideal of > 1.5, indicating severe liquidity issues)
2. Debt-to-Equity Ratio = 6B / (5B - 6B) = -6 (Negative equity, extremely high financial risk)
3. Return on Assets = -500M / 5B = -0.1 or -10% (Indicating significant losses)
4. Altman Z-Score (simplified version for non-manufacturing firms):
Z = 6.56A + 3.26B + 6.72C + 1.05D
Where:
A = (Current Assets - Current Liabilities) / Total Assets = (2B - 4B) / 5B = -0.4
B = Retained Earnings / Total Assets (assume -1B) = -1B / 5B = -0.2
C = EBIT / Total Assets (assume -400M) = -400M / 5B = -0.08
D = Book Value of Equity / Total Liabilities = -1B / 6B = -0.167
Z = 6.56(-0.4) + 3.26(-0.2) + 6.72(-0.08) + 1.05(-0.167)
Z = -2.624 - 0.652 - 0.5376 - 0.17535
Z = -3.98895
Interpretation: The Z-score of -3.98895 is well below 1.1, indicating a very high probability of
financial distress and potential bankruptcy.
This analysis aligns with Uchumi's real-world financial struggles, including multiple periods of
insolvency and attempts at restructuring and it eventually went under.