DISQUALIFICATION OF WITNESSES
DISQUALIFICATION OF WITNESSES
Except:
a. In a civil case file by one against the other;
If the civil case is between a spouse and the direct ascendant or
descendant of the other spouse, the MDR still applies. The rule
contemplates that for the exception to the MDR to apply, the civil case
must be between both the spouses. —The witness spouse may then be
barred from testifying against the affected spouse over the objection of
the latter.
b. In a criminal case for a crime committed by one against the other or the
latter’s direct ascendants or descendants.
If the crime is committed by one spouse against the collateral relatives of
the other spouse, the MDR applies.
NOTA BENE:
a. For the Marital Disqualification Rule to be invoked, the spouses must be
validly married. It does not cover illicit cohabitation.
b. The valid marriage between the spouses must be in existence when the
testimony was given.
c. The MDR prohibits one spouse from testifying against the other during their
marriage. Therefore, if the testimony was given after their marriage have
been dissolved, the MDR does not apply.
d. MDR applies notwithstanding that the facts which are the subject of the
testimony are received by the witness-spouse before the marriage as long as
the testimony is given during the existence of marriage, the MDR applies.
e. The MDR may be waived by the failure of the affected spouse to object to
the testimony of the witness spouse at the time the latter is called to testify.
f. The MDR also covers the production of documents.
MDR DOES NOT APPLY IN CASES WHERE THE RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN THE HUSBAND AND WIFE ARE ESTRANGED:
The MDR finds no application where the relationship between the husband and the
wife are so strained that there is no more peace, tranquility or harmony to be
preserved.
DISQUALIFICATION BY REASON OF PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION:
ELEMENTS:
A. The must be a valid marriage between the husband and the wife;
B. There must be a confidential communication received by one from the other;
C. The confidential communication was received during the marriage.
NOTA BENE:
a. If the confidential information was received before the marriage, the Marital
Privileged Communication Rule does not apply. However, if the testimony
of the witness spouse regarding the confidential information may be
objected to on the ground of Marital Disqualification Rule as long as the
testimony is given during the existence of marriage.
If the confidential information received before the marriage is given after
the marriage, neither the MPC Rule/MDR applies.
b. If the confidential information was received by one spouse from a third
person, the MPC rule does not apply. The rule contemplates that the
confidential communication must be received by one spouse from the other.
c. The MPC Rule may be waived by failure to object at the time when the
witness spouse was called to testify.
2. ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP:
An attorney or any person reasonably believed by the client to be engaged in
the practice of law cannot, without the consent of the client, be examined as to
any communication made by the client to him or her or his or her advise thereon
in the course of or with a view to professional employment.
Attorney’s secretary, stenographer, clerk or any person assisting the lawyer may
not also be examined as to any fact the knowledge of which was acquired in
such capacity, without the consent of the client.
This privilege also applies to any person, including family members who
participated in the treatment or diagnosis of the patient under the direction and
supervision of such physician or psychotherapist.
4. PRIEST-PENTITENT PRIVILEGE:
A priest, minister or any person reasonably believed to be so by the affected
person cannot, without the consent of the affected person, be examined as to
any communication or confession made to or advise given by him in his
professional character in the course of the discipline enjoined by the church to
which the priest or minister belongs.
In furtherance
of fraud