11. Advanced Modal Analysis
11. Advanced Modal Analysis
Notice
Information in this document is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of
Vibrant Technology. Except as otherwise noted, names, companies, and data used in examples, sample outputs, or
screen shots, are fictitious and are used solely to illustrate potential applications of the software.
Warranty
Vibrant Technology, Inc. warrants that (a) the software in this product will perform substantially in accordance with
the accompanying documentation, for a period of one (1) year from the date of delivery, and that (b) any hardware
accompanying the software will be free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one (1) year from
the date of delivery. During this period, if a defect is reported to Vibrant Technology, replacement software or
hardware will be provided to the customer at no cost, excluding delivery charges. Any replacement software will be
warranted for the remainder of the original warranty period or thirty (30) days, whichever is longer.
This warranty shall not apply to defects resulting from improper or inadequate maintenance by the customer, customer
supplied software or interfacing, unauthorized modification or misuse, operation outside of the environmental
specifications for the product, or improper site preparation or maintenance.
If the software does not materially operate as warranted above, the sole remedy of the customer (and the entire
liability of Vibrant Technology) shall be the correction or detour of programming errors attributable to Vibrant
Technology. The software should not be relied on as the sole basis to solve a problem whose incorrect solution could
result in injury to a person or property. If the software is employed in such a manner, it is at the entire risk of the
customer, and Vibrant Technology disclaims all liability for such misuse.
NO OTHER WARRANTY IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. VIBRANT TECHNOLOGY SPECIFICALLY MAKES
NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND WITH REGARD TO THIS MATERIAL, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT ABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE.
THE REMEDIES PROVIDED HEREIN ARE THE CUSTOMER'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDIES.
VIBRANT TECHNOLOGY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL,
INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES IN CONNECTION WITH THE FURNISHING,
PERFORMANCE, OR USE OF THIS PRODUCT, WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT, OR ANY
OTHER LEGAL THEORY.
The software described in this document is copyrighted by Vibrant Technology, Inc. or its suppliers and is protected
by United States copyright laws and international treaty provisions. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this
program, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum
extent possible under the law.
You may make copies of the software only for backup or archival purposes. No part of this manual may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means for any purpose without the express written permission of
Vibrant Technology.
Copyright © 1992-2022 by Vibrant Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America.
Table of Contents
3
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
4
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
5
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
Multi-reference curve fitting is required to extract all modal parameters from a set of multi-reference FRFs.
Single-Reference FRFs
Single-reference FRFs are the minimum requirement for extracting modal parameters of a structure using FRF-
based curve fitting
• Single-reference FRFs are obtained by exciting the structure with a single fixed exciter and simultaneously
acquiring the force & response from one or more response DOFs
• Single-reference FRFs are also obtained by using a single fixed response sensor and simultaneously
acquiring force & response while exciting the structure at one or more excitation DOFs
Multi-Reference FRFs
Multi-reference FRFs are required for extracting the modal parameters of closely-coupled modes, repeated
roots, or local modes of a structure.
• Multi-reference FRFs are obtained by exciting the structure with multiple fixed exciters and simultaneously
acquiring the forces & responses from one or more response DOFs
• Multi-reference FRFs are also obtained by exciting the structure at multiple DOFs and simultaneously
acquiring the force and responses from more than one response point & direction
A multi-reference modal test is useful when a structure has high modal density (many resonance peaks in close
frequency to one another).
6
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
Random excitation together with spectrum averaging is used to "average out" the non-linear dynamic behavior
of the structure from the spectra and hence from the FRFs
Multi-Ref CMIFs Indicating Two Closely Coupled Modes Near 200 Hz.
Multi-Reference CMIF
7
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
Each Multi-Reference CMIF & MMIF also provides a Modal Participation Factor curve for each multi-reference
FRF.
Each Modal participation factor is used to weight each reference of FRF data during Multi-reference curve fitting
The Multi-Reference Polynomial method uses a multi-reference version of the Rational Fraction Orthogonal
Polynomial method.
• The curve fitting model size in the Modes box on the Polynomial tab is used for estimating modal Frequency
& Damping
• Stability curve fitting is done for model sizes from “1” to the Max. Model Size listed on the Stability tab
• Each modal frequency estimate is displayed as a vertical line on the Stability diagram
• Each modal damping estimate is displayed as a horizontal line on the Stability diagram
• The Stability tab contains several curve fitting methods for estimating modal frequency & damping
AF Polynomial (Alias-Free Polynomial)
This method is an extension of the Rational Fraction Orthogonal Polynomial curve fitting method.
It is called "alias-free" because it places extra computational modes toward the edges of the curve fitting band
instead of aliasing them throughout the band
Complex Exponential
This popular time domain method estimates poles by curve fitting Impulse Response Functions (IRFs), the
Inverse FFT of FRFs.
• During curve fitting, the Inverse FFT is applied to each FRF to obtain its corresponding IRF
Z Polynomial
This method is an extension of the Rational Fraction Orthogonal Polynomial curve fitting method and uses the Z-
transform to obtain more stable powers of the frequency variable.
The Z-transform maps frequencies to a unit circle, resulting in numerically stable solution equations.
• Press the Stability button on the Stability tab or execute Curve Fit | Stability | Stability diagram
8
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
Stable Groups will change if the criteria for defining a Stable Group are changed.
• If the Min. Number of Stable Poles is too small, computational Poles will be displayed on the edges of the
Stability diagram, as shown below
Stable Group Colors alternate between the top two Contour Colors chosen in the File | Data Block Options box.
9
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
Poles Diagram
When the Poles box is checked on the Stable Groups tab, Poles estimates are displayed on a Poles diagram as
shown below
• Modal frequency estimates are plotted along the horizontal axis
• Modal damping estimates are plotted along the vertical axis
10
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
When a Pole Selection box is drawn, the average value of the poles in the selection box is added to the Modal
Parameters spreadsheet.
• Click & drag on the Stability or Poles diagram, to draw a selection box and enclose one or more poles
11
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
A Complexity Plot displays the magnitudes & phase all (or selected) M# values at the current Cursor position
Each shape component of a normalized mode shape has a phase of 0 or 180 degrees.
A normalized mode shape is also called a normal mode shape.
An FEA model with no damping yields normal mode shapes.
During shape animation, a normalized shape exhibits a standing wave motion, and its node lines do not move.
The shape components of a normalized shape lie on a straight line in a Complexity Plot.
Complex Mode Shape
12
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
When Display | Normalized Shape is checked, complex shape components are displayed on the left, and
normalized shape components are displayed on the right of the Complexity Plot, as shown below.
13
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
Normalization Line
When a shape is normalized, the red (+) shape components are given 0 degrees phase, and the blue (-) shape
components are given 180 degrees phase
The normalization line (dashed line) on a Complexity Plot is used to normalize each complex shape.
• Each shape in a Shape Table (SHP) can have a different normalization line
To rotate the normalization line to a different angle
• Click & drag near the normalization line on the Complexity Plot
Flipping the Phases of the Right-Hand Shape
During Animate | Animate a Pair, if two similar shapes are animating 180 degrees out of phase with one
another, the phases of right-hand shape can be changed by 180 degrees so that the two shapes animate more
closely together.
• Execute Animate | Animate a Pair | Flip Right Sign in the Structure (STR) window to multiply the right-
hand shape by "-1"
• Or drag & rotate the the normalization line on the Complexity Plot to flip the phase of the shape
components
Modal Phase Co-linearity (MPC)
MPC is a measure of whether or not the components of a complex shape are normalized. they lie on a straight line.
14
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
This command uses the same equations as the Tools | Modal Participation command in a Shape Table (SHP) but
applies them at each sample of M# data.
Only mode shapes are used for decomposition. Modal frequency & damping are not used.
The following equation is solved at each sample of time or frequency data in the Data Block (BLK)
[Shapes] {Decomp(sample)} = {ODS(sample)}
(n by m) (m by 1) (n by 1)
[Shapes] ➔ matrix of mode shapes (n by m). Each column of [Shapes] contains a mode shape
{Decomp(sample)} ➔ participation of each mode shape in the {ODS} at each sample
{ODS(sample)} ➔ ODS data at each sample in the Data Block (BLK)
n ➔ number of mode shape DOFs
m ➔ number of mode shapes
15
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
Each resonance curve can be curve fit to extract the experimental modal frequency & damping associated with that
resonance.
Only mode shapes are used for Modal Expansion. Frequency & damping are not used.
This command uses the same equations as the Tools | Modal Expansion command in a Shape Table (SHP) but
applies them at each sample of M# data,
The expanded M#s can be curve fit using any FRF-based curve fitting method.
16
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
Effective mass, stiffness & damping are the values each mode would have if it were a single Mass-Spring-Damper
located at a DOF of the mode shape
This command can only be used with UMM mode shapes
Effective mass, damping & stiffness are calculated for each mode with the formulas
Effective Mass = 1 / (Freq x Real (DP Residue) + Damp x Imaginary (DP Residue)
Effective Stiffness = (Freq2 + Damp2) x Effective Mass
Effective Damping = 2 x Damp x Effective Mass
Freq ➔ damped natural frequency of the mode
Damp ➔ half power point damping of the mode
DP Residue ➔ driving point Residue for each component of the mode shape
Tools | Modal Participation
Calculates the Modal Participation, the numerical participation of one set of shapes in another set of shapes.
The Modal Participation equates the shapes in one Shape Table (SHP) with the shapes of another Shape Table
(SHP)
Each Shape Table (SHP) can contain ODS's, EMA mode shapes, OMA mode shapes, FEA mode shapes or
Engineering Data Shapes
17
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
18
Advanced Modal Analysis March 11, 2022
Modal Expansion can be controlled by selecting shapes and/or selecting M#s in either Shape Table (SHP)
19