0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views10 pages

CrashHelmetRemoval

This document discusses the safe removal of crash helmets in emergency situations, outlining the necessary skills and procedures for paramedics. It emphasizes the importance of helmet removal for effective patient assessment and management while detailing the anatomical considerations and potential injuries associated with motorcycle accidents. The chapter includes a skill assessment framework to evaluate the competency of paramedics in performing helmet removal safely.

Uploaded by

Everic González
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views10 pages

CrashHelmetRemoval

This document discusses the safe removal of crash helmets in emergency situations, outlining the necessary skills and procedures for paramedics. It emphasizes the importance of helmet removal for effective patient assessment and management while detailing the anatomical considerations and potential injuries associated with motorcycle accidents. The chapter includes a skill assessment framework to evaluate the competency of paramedics in performing helmet removal safely.

Uploaded by

Everic González
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/344602437

Crash Helmet Removal

Chapter · October 2020

CITATIONS READS

0 216

1 author:

Bodie Karlek

4 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Bodie Karlek on 10 September 2022.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


5.5 Crash helmet removal
Joe Karlek

.
on
Chapter objectives

si
is
At the end of this chapter the reader will be able to:

rm
1. Identify the indications to remove a crash helmet

pe
2. Demonstrate the safe removal of a crash helmet

t
ou
Resources required for this assessment Skill matrix

ith
w
• Standardised patient or mannequin This assessment requires:
• Motorcycle helmet ce
• Infection control (CS 1.3)
du
• Hand decontamination agent • Communication (CS 1.5)
o

• Disposable gloves • Consent (CS 1.6)


pr

• Clinical waste bag • Trauma assessment (CS 5.1)


re

• Method of documenting the results • Cervical collar application (CS 5.6)


t
no

This assessment is a component of:


o

• Trauma (Chapter 5)
.D
lia
tra
us
rA

Introduction 2017). These injuries vary in severity and are related to


the level of deceleration experienced by the rider. The face
ie

Crash helmets are synonymous with motorcycle riding and cervical spine are similarly vulnerable in motorcycle
ev

and some motor sports, and the benefits of wearing them trauma wherever head trauma can occur. Spinal injury is
are almost intuitive. However, although helmets are worn relatively uncommon, and it is unclear whether wearing
ls

for the purposes of safety, they can inhibit the prompt and a helmet is beneficial or a contributing factor (Branfoot,
)E

effective assessment and management of those wearing 1994; Liu et al., 2008; Rice et al., 2016).
them. Paramedics must be competent in the removal of Crash helmets have been found to be an effective
(C

crash helmets so that treatment is not delayed or injury method of reducing cerebral injury and mortality
made more severe. This chapter discusses the safe removal (McIntosh et al., 2013; Rice et al., 2016; Singleton, 2017;
of motorcycle helmets. Sung et al., 2016). A 2008 Cochrane review found that
crash helmets are effective at reducing mortality and head
Anatomy and physiology injury by 42% and 69% respectively (Liu et al., 2008).
The scalp, skull and intracranial contents are better able to
Closed head injuries experienced by motorcycle riders tolerate collision forces when a crash helmet is worn, due
include coup and contra-coup, concussion, shearing of to the distribution of forces.
blood vessels, intracranial haemorrhage and meningeal Crash helmets typically enclose the head and face,
bleeding (Fernandes and de Sousa, 2013; Singleton, extending over the occiput to the point of the upper spine

529
Clinical Skills for Paramedic Practice ANZ Workbook

to offer protection against head, neck and facial injury.


Unsurprisingly, injuries to these areas can be difficult to
manage with a helmet in place.

Clinical rationale
A crash helmet has four distinct components: a hard outer
shell, inner lining, comfort padding and chin strap. These
components work collectively but in different ways to
protect the head when it is involved in a collision. The

.
outer shell and inner lining are directly related to dealing

on
with the forces experienced by the head during a crash.

si
The chin strap maintains the helmet in position and

is
prevents its dislodgement. The padding is primarily for
Figure 5.5.1 Removing a helmet occiput first

rm
the rider’s comfort, but in newer models it can be removed
easily to aid helmet removal.

pe
The hard outer shell is designed to spread the impact • full-face helmets, which are designed to cover the
force over a larger surface area and prevent sharp objects entire head, face and neck

t
penetrating the helmet. This spread across the helmet • modified full-face helmets with a flip-open or

ou
allows the inner liner to absorb these forces by crumpling, removable face/chin

ith
reducing the amount of force that actually reaches the • open-face helmets that have no face or chin coverage
skull and brain (Coelho et al., 2013; Fernandes and de • motocross helmets, which are like full-face helmets but

w
Sousa, 2013; Fernandes et al., 2013). The energy involved are designed to be worn with goggles; they may have
in a motorcycle collision can be extreme due to the speeds
involved and the lack of safety features on a motorcycle ce
an attached visor.
Since the helmet is designed to fit reasonably tightly,
du
compared to a modern car. it will take some manipulative effort to remove. The best
o

Most conscious and ambulant patients remove their strategy is to release or cut the chin strap, flex the lower
pr

own crash helmet before the emergency services arrive. sides to loosen it if possible, then rotate the helmet off over
The patient who is still wearing their helmet may need the face. It will not likely pull straight off in an upwards
re

assistance in its removal. Bystanders often elect against fashion as the chin piece may snare on the patient’s nose.
t

removing the helmet (Branfoot, 1994) for fear of By the helmet rotating back upwards and over towards the
no

exacerbating injury. front, this can be avoided. As the helmet is removed, the
Removing the helmet allows more effective second paramedic providing manual in-line stabilisation
o

communication and patient assessment. Failure to do so will have to be prepared to support the head and prevent
.D

interferes with all airway procedures and the assessment the occiput from falling (Fig. 5.5.1).
lia

and management of other injuries (Branfoot, 1994).


Full head enclosure leads to rebreathing exhaled gas, and Clinical skill assessment process
tra

hypoxia/hypercarbia can occur (Brühwiler et al., 2005).


Helmet removal can cause notable movement of The following section outlines the clinical skill assessment
us

the cervical spine. This should be opposed by a second tools that should be used to determine a student’s ability
rA

paramedic providing manual in-line stabilisation to demonstrate the safe removal of a crash helmet.
(Branfoot, 1994). Once the helmet has been removed, a 1. Clinical Skill Work Instruction
ie

cervical collar can be applied if indicated. It is important 2. Formative Clinical Skill Assessment (F-CSAT)
ev

not to discard the helmet or leave it at the scene, as it 3. Performance Improvement Plan (PIP)
can provide insights into the impact for the Emergency 4. Summative Clinical Skill Assessment (S-CSAT)
ls

Department and may be deemed evidence by the police. (5. Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) – see
)E

Several styles of motorcycle helmets are available: Chapter 1.1)


(C

Clinical Skill Work Instruction


Equipment and resources: Standardised patient or mannequin; motorcycle helmet; hand decontamination agent;
disposable gloves; clinical waste bag; method of documenting results

Associated Clinical Skills: Infection control; Communication; Consent; Trauma assessment; Cervical collar application

530
5.5 • Crash helmet removal

Crash helmet removal


Activity Critical Action Rationale
Personal Don PPE as required. For infection control.
protection
Prepare Position patient supine if circumstances allow. Helmet can be Removal is easiest if the patient is
patient removed from any position if patient cannot be moved. supine.
Second paramedic maintains spinal immobilisation. Spinal immobilisation is likely to be
required.

.
on
Explain procedure to patient. Open helmet visor if possible to Gain consent and cooperation.
facilitate communication.

si
is
Prepare Identify and unclip or, if necessary, cut away chin strap. Remove Removal of the helmet is inhibited
helmet for glasses if patient is wearing them. while the chin strap is in situ.

rm
removal Glasses may cause injury if not

pe
removed.
Manual Assistant places one hand under patient’s occiput for support. Support must be from below to

t
in-line Their other hand supports the mandible above the neck to allow helmet removal.

ou
stabilisation provide spinal immobilisation.

ith
Remove chin Pull on release tabs if helmet has this feature for emergency Removing chin pads provides more

w
pads removal. room and easier removal.
Remove
helmet ce
Grip base of helmet at the lateral edges and apply outward
pressure to open the helmet.
Pulling helmet opening apart helps
avoid catching the ears, tilting it
du
Gently pull chin piece upwards slightly, towards the nose. avoids the nose and occiput.
Rotate the posterior helmet base from occiput over the head in Maintain direction of removal
o

line with the spine. with that of spine to prevent


pr

Once the rear has been part-way removed, rotate the front by unnecessary cervical spine
re

tilting chin portion over the nose. Remove helmet fully. movement.
t

Head support Provide occipital support with padding. Second paramedic Spinal immobilisation is maintained
no

provides manual in-line spinal immobilisation (see Chapter 5.7), throughout the procedure.
replacing anterior/posterior support with lateral support.
o
.D

Replace Replace glasses if removed during procedure and patient Inability to see may be distressing.
glasses requires them.
lia

Retain helmet Retain helmet for review by Emergency Department staff and the The helmet provides information in
tra

police. relation to pattern of injury and it


may also be evidence.
us

Report Document/hand over whether a helmet was worn/removed and Accurate record kept and
rA

deliver helmet if retained. continuity of patient care.


ie
ev
ls
)E
(C

Formative Clinical Skill Assessment (F-CSAT)


Equipment and resources: Standardised patient or mannequin; motorcycle helmet; hand decontamination agent;
disposable gloves; clinical waste bag; method of documenting results

Associated Clinical Skills: Infection control; Communication; Consent; Trauma assessment; Cervical collar application

Staff/Student being assessed: _______________________________

531
Clinical Skills for Paramedic Practice ANZ Workbook

Crash helmet removal


Activity Critical Action Performance
Personal Dons PPE as required. 0 1 2 3 4
protection
Prepares Positions supine if circumstances allow. 0 1 2 3 4
patient
Second paramedic maintains spinal immobilisation. 0 1 2 3 4
Explains procedure to patient. Opens helmet visor if possible to facilitate 0 1 2 3 4
communication.

.
on
Prepares Identifies and unclips or, if necessary, cuts away chin strap. Removes glasses 0 1 2 3 4

si
helmet for if worn.

is
removal

rm
Manual Assistant places one hand under patient’s occiput for support. Their other 0 1 2 3 4
in-line hand supports the mandible above the neck to provide spinal immobilisation.

pe
stabilisation

t
Removes chin Pulls on release tabs if helmet has this feature for emergency removal. 0 1 2 3 4

ou
pads

ith
Removes Grips base of helmet at lateral edges and applies outward pressure to open 0 1 2 3 4
helmet helmet.

w
Gently pulls chin piece upwards slightly towards the nose.

ce
Rotates posterior helmet base from occiput over the head, in line with the
spine.
du
Once rear has been part-way removed, rotates the front by tilting chin portion
over the nose. Removes helmet fully.
o
pr

Head support Provides occipital support with padding. Second paramedic provides manual 0 1 2 3 4
in-line spinal immobilisation (see Chapter 5.7), replacing anterior/posterior
re

support with lateral support.


t
no

Replaces Replaces glasses if removed during procedure and patient requires them. 0 1 2 3 4
glasses
o

Retains Retains helmet for review by Emergency Department staff and police. 0 1 2 3 4
.D

helmet
lia

Reports Documents/hands whether a helmet was worn/removed and delivers helmet 0 1 2 3 4


if retained.
tra
us

Standard Achieved: (please circle one)


rA

Competent (C) Not Yet Competent* (NYC)


ie

Staff/Student Name: _______________________________


ev

Assessor (please print name): _______________________________


ls
)E

Signed (Assessor): _______________________________

Date of Assessment: _______________________________


(C

Comments:

*If Not Yet Competent (NYC) a PIP needs to be completed and a repeat of the F-CSAT

532
5.5 • Crash helmet removal

Formative Clinical Skill Assessment (F-CSAT) Key

Level of
Quality of assistance
Skill level Standard of procedure performance Outcome required
4 Safe Confident Achieved No supporting
Safe for Accurate Accurate intended outcome cues*required
unsupervised Behaviour is appropriate to Expedient

.
on
practice context

si
3 Safe Confident Achieved Requires occasional
Requires Accurate Accurate intended outcome supportive cues*

is
supervision Behaviour is appropriate to Takes longer

rm
context than required

pe
2 Safe Lacks certainty Would not have Requires frequent verbal
Requires Accurate achieved outcome and occasional physical

t
assistance Behaviour generally appropriate without support directives in addition to

ou
to context supportive cues*

ith
1 Safe only with guidance Unskilled Would not have Requires continuous

w
Requires Not completely accurate Inefficient achieved outcome verbal and frequent
direction without support physical directive cues*
0 Unsafe Unskilled ce
Would not have Requires continuous
du
Unsafe Unable to demonstrate behaviour achieved outcome verbal and continuous
Lack of insight into behaviour physical directive cues*
o

appropriate to context
pr

*Refers to physical directives or verbal supportive cues


re
t
no
o
.D

Performance Improvement Plan (PIP)


lia

Please document the agreed education plan and completion timelines for areas assessed as less than 4.
tra

This plan should be presented to assessor prior to commencement of summative assessment.


us

Where was Student summary


rA

supervisor support of deficit. (Why was Completed


required? there a problem?) Improvement Plan (Y/N)
ie
ev
ls
)E
(C

Staff/Student Name: _______________________________

Staff/Student Signature: _______________________________

Educator Name: _______________________________

Educator Signature: _______________________________

533
Clinical Skills for Paramedic Practice ANZ Workbook

Summative Clinical Skill Assessment (S-CSAT)


Equipment and resources: Standardised patient or mannequin; motorcycle helmet; hand decontamination agent;
disposable gloves; clinical waste bag; method of documenting results

Associated Clinical Skills: Infection control; Communication; Consent; Trauma assessment; Cervical collar application

Staff/Student being assessed: ___________________________________________________

• Completed Formative Clinical Skill Assessment (F-CSAT): YES NO

.
on
• Completed Performance Improvement Plan (PIP): YES NO N/A

si
is
Crash helmet removal

rm
Achieved
Activity Critical Action Without Direction

pe
Personal Dons PPE as required. NO YES

t
protection

ou
Prepares patient Positions supine if circumstances allow. NO YES

ith
Second paramedic maintains spinal immobilisation. NO YES

w
Explains procedure to patient. Opens helmet visor if possible to facilitate NO YES
communication. ce
du
Prepares helmet Identifies and unclips or, if necessary, cuts away chin strap. Removes NO YES
for removal glasses if worn.
o
pr

Manual in-line Assistant places one hand under patient’s occiput for support. Their NO YES
re

stabilisation other hand supports the mandible above the neck to provide spinal
immobilisation.
t
no

Removes chin Pulls on release tabs if helmet has this feature for emergency removal. NO YES
pads
o

Removes helmet Grips base of helmet at lateral edges and applies outward pressure to NO YES
.D

open helmet.
Gently pulls chin piece upwards slightly, towards the nose.
lia

Rotates posterior helmet base from occiput over the head, in line with the
tra

spine.
Once rear has been part-way removed, rotates the front by tilting chin
us

portion over the nose. Removes helmet fully.


rA

Head support Provides occipital support with padding. Second paramedic provides NO YES
manual in-line spinal immobilisation (see Chapter 5.7), replacing anterior/
ie

posterior support with lateral support.


ev

Replaces Replaces glasses if removed during procedure and patient requires them. NO YES
ls

glasses
)E

Retains helmet Retains helmet for review by Emergency Department staff and police. NO YES
(C

Reports Documents/hands over helmet if a helmet was worn/removed and NO YES


delivers helmet if retained.

534
5.5 • Crash helmet removal

Standard Achieved: (please circle one)

Competent (C) Not Yet Competent* (NYC)

Staff/Student Name: _______________________________

Assessor (please print name): _______________________________

Signed (Assessor): _______________________________

Date of Assessment: _______________________________

Comments:

.
on
si
*If Not Yet Competent (NYC) a PIP needs to be completed and a repeat of the F-CSAT

is
rm
t pe
Clinical findings the patient. The last is a traditional in-line stabilisation

ou
position superior to the patient’s head. Removal should

ith
occur at a pace that allows the support person to adjust
Basic options their position each time to enable their role.

w
Opening the visor, if there is one, allows better
Minimise movement
communication, removal of the patient’s glasses if worn
and rudimentary facial/airway access. It may also help to ce
It is difficult to stop all head movement, even if resistance
du
avoid rebreathing. is concerted. Gentle and small helmet removal movements
o

can assist, using progressive back and forward gains rather


Head support
pr

than one direct attempt at removal.


The second paramedic providing head stabilisation is
re

likely to have to make several adjustments throughout.


t

The first position involves the helmet resting on the


no

PRACTICE TIP!
ground. This will change to providing support from below
the head/neck during helmet removal, likely sitting beside
o

Before removing the helmet, double check that


.D

the patient’s glasses have been removed and the


strap is undone.
lia

PRACTICE TIP!
tra

Some helmets allow the removal of components


us

including ear padding, fold-up chin pieces or PRACTICE TIP!


even frontal pieces. If any of these features are
rA

present, make use of them first. If possible, ask Helmet removal is better if performed by two
the rider for any tips or strategies for removing paramedics, with one supporting the head and
ie

the helmet. They are familiar with the device and resisting movement, and the other removing the
ev

may offer useful suggestions. helmet.


ls
)E
(C

535
Clinical Skills for Paramedic Practice ANZ Workbook

TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONS


1. List the styles of helmets you might encounter during practice.
Full-face; open-face; flip-up; motocross with detachable visor and goggles.

2. What are the four main components of the helmet?


Hard outer shell; inner lining; comfort padding; chin strap.

.
on
3. What is the purpose of the outer shell and inner lining?

si
To prevent penetration of objects and to distribute the force of the impact.

is
4.

rm
How can the inner lining help the rescuer remove the helmet?
On newer helmets the inner lining can be removed, aiding removal of the helmet.

pe
5. What is the most common type of injury experienced by motorcycle riders?

t
ou
Closed head injuries.

ith
6. List the specific injuries common to the type given in question 5.

w
Coup and contra-coup; shearing of blood vessels; bleeding between the meninges.

7. ce
What factor affecting the rider impacts most on a head injury?
du
The force of deceleration.
o

8. Removing the helmet is important for what reasons?


pr

Communication; airway management; patient assessment.


re

9. What position should the patient be in for helmet removal?


t
no

Supine.
o

10. Why should the helmet not be discarded?


.D

It is helpful to the Emergency Department and may be deemed evidence by the police.
lia
tra
us
rA
ie
ev
ls
)E
(C

536
6
5.5 • Crash helmet removal

References
Branfoot, T., 1994. Motorcyclists, full face helmets and neck injuries: McIntosh, A.S., Curtis, K., Rankin, T., Cox, M., Pang, T.Y.,
can you take the helmet off safely, and if so, how? Journal of Accident McCrory, P. and Finch, C.F., 2013. Associations between helmet
and Emergency Medicine, (11), 117–120. use and brain injuries amongst injured pedal- and motor-cyclists:
Brühwiler, P.A., Stämpfli, R., Huber, R. and Camenzind, M., 2005. a case series analysis of trauma centre presentations. Journal of the
CO2 and O2 concentrations in integral motorcycle helmets. Applied Australasian College of Road Safety, 24(2), 11.
Ergonomics, 36(5), 625–633. Rice, T.M., Troszak, L., Ouellet, J.V., Erhardt, T., Smith, G.S. and
Coelho, R.M., de Sousa, R.A., Fernandes, F.A.O. and Teixeira-Dias, Tsai, B.W., 2016. Motorcycle helmet use and the risk of head,
F.M.V.H., 2013. New composite liners for energy absorption neck, and fatal injury: revisiting the Hurt Study. Accident Analysis &
purposes. Materials & Design, 43, 384–392. Prevention, 91, 200–207.

.
Singleton, M.D., 2017. Differential protective effects of motorcycle

on
Fernandes, F.A.O. and de Sousa, R.A., 2013. Motorcycle helmets – a
state of the art review. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 56, 1–21. helmets against head injury. Traffic Injury Prevention, 18(4), 387–392.

si
Fernandes, F.A., de Sousa, R.J.A., Willinger, R. and Deck, C., 2013. Sung, K.M., Noble, J., Kim, S.C., Jeon, H.J., Kim, J.Y., Do, H.H.,
Park, S.O., Lee, K.R. and Baek, K.J., 2016. The preventive effect

is
Finite element analysis of helmeted impacts and head injury evaluation
with a commercial road helmet. Paper presented at the International of head injury by helmet type in motorcycle crashes: a rural Korean

rm
Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) single-center observational study. BioMed Research International, doi:
conference, 11–13 September, Gothenburg, Sweden. 10.1155/2016/1849134.

pe
Liu, B.C., Ivers, R., Norton, R., Boufous, S., Blows, S. and Lo, S.K.,
2008. Helmets for preventing injury in motorcycle riders. Online: The

t
ou
Cochrane Library.

ith
w
ce
o du
pr
t re
no
o
.D
lia
tra
us
rA
ie
ev
ls
)E
(C

537

View publication stats

You might also like