0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views6 pages

The Emergence of Nationalism

The document discusses the emergence of nationalism in India, highlighting the formation of political associations and the establishment of the Indian National Congress in the late 19th century, which aimed to empower Indians against British rule. It details key movements and events, including the Rowlatt Satyagraha, the Non-Cooperation Movement, and the Salt March led by Mahatma Gandhi, which galvanized mass participation in the struggle for independence. The narrative culminates in the partition of India and the demand for Pakistan by the Muslim League, leading to significant political changes in the region.

Uploaded by

ayaan8143
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views6 pages

The Emergence of Nationalism

The document discusses the emergence of nationalism in India, highlighting the formation of political associations and the establishment of the Indian National Congress in the late 19th century, which aimed to empower Indians against British rule. It details key movements and events, including the Rowlatt Satyagraha, the Non-Cooperation Movement, and the Salt March led by Mahatma Gandhi, which galvanized mass participation in the struggle for independence. The narrative culminates in the partition of India and the demand for Pakistan by the Muslim League, leading to significant political changes in the region.

Uploaded by

ayaan8143
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

The Emergence of Nationalism

India was the people of India irrespective of class, colour, caste, creed,
language, or gender. Even its resources and systems were meant for all of
them. But, the British were exercising control over the resources of India
and the lives of its people. This consciousness began to be clearly stated
by the political associations formed after 1850, especially those that came
into being in the 1870s and 1880s. The more important ones were the
Poona Sarvajanik Sabha, the Indian Association, the Madras Mahajan
Sabha, the Bombay Presidency Association, and the Indian National
Congress.

These associations functioned in specific parts of the country, and their


goals were stated as the goals of all the people of India. They believed
that the Indian people should be empowered to make decisions regarding
their affairs.

In 1878, the Arms Act was passed, which disallowed Indians from
possessing arms. During the same year, the Vernacular Press Act was
enacted in an effort to silence those who were critical of the government.
Under this Act, the government was allowed to confiscate the assets of
newspapers, including their printing presses, if anything that was
published was found “objectionable”. In 1883, the Ilbert Bill was
introduced, which provided for the trial of British or European persons by
Indians and sought equality between British and Indian judges in the
country.

The Indian National Congress was established in December 1885. The


early leaders were Dadabhai Naoroji, Pherozeshah Mehta, Badruddin
Tyabji, W.C. Bonnerji, Surendranath Banerji, Romesh Chandra Dutt, S.
Subramania Iyer, among others, largely belonged to Bombay and
Calcutta.

A nation in the making


In the first twenty years, Congress demanded Indians in the government
and in administration. It wanted the Legislative Council to be more
representative, more powerful and introduced in provinces where none
existed. It demanded Indians be placed in high positions in the
government. The demand for Indianisation of the administration was
against racism since most important jobs were monopolised by white
officials. Indianisation would reduce the drain of wealth to England. Other
demands included the separation of the judiciary from the executive, the
repeal of the Arms Act and the freedom of speech and expression.

The Congress raised a number of economic issues. The British rule led to
poverty and famines. They demanded a reduction of revenue, a cut in
military expenditure, and more funds for irrigation. Congress also passed
many resolutions on the salt tax, the treatment of Indian labourers
abroad, and the sufferings of forest dwellers.

The Moderate leaders published newspapers, wrote articles, and showed


how British rule was leading to the economic ruin of the country. They felt
that the British had respect for the ideals of freedom and justice, so they
would accept the demands of the Indians.

“Freedom is our birthright”


Many Indians raised questions against the political style of the Congress.
In Bengal, Maharashtra and Punjab, leaders such as Bepin Chandra Pal,
Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Lala Lajpat Rai criticised the Moderates for their
politics of prayers and emphasised the importance of self-reliance and
constructive work.

Bengal got partitioned in 1905, which was the biggest province of British
India. The British divided Bengal for reasons of administrative
convenience. The British, instead of removing the non-Bengali areas from
the province, separated East Bengal and merged it with Assam.

The Moderates and the Radicals opposed the partition of Bengal. The mast
protest and large public meetings led to the Swadeshi movement,
strongest in Bengal and in deltaic Andhra; it was known as the
Vandemataram Movement.

The Swadeshi movement opposed British rule and encouraged the ideas
of self-help, swadeshi enterprise, national education, and the use of Indian
languages. Some individuals suggested that revolutionary violence would
be necessary to overthrow British rule.

All India Muslim League was founded by a group of Muslim landlords and
nawabs at Dacca in 1906. It supported the partition of Bengal. The League
desired separate electorates for Muslims, a demand conceded by the
government in 1909. The Congress split in 1907. After the split, Congress
came to be dominated by the Moderates, with Tilak’s followers functioning
from outside. The two groups reunited in December 1915. The Congress
and the Muslim League signed the Lucknow Pact and decided to work
together for representative government in the country.

The Growth of Mass Nationalism


After 1919 the struggle against British rule gradually became a mass
movement involving peasants, tribals, students and women in large
numbers and occasionally factory workers as well.

After the First World War, India’s economic and political situation got
altered, which led to a huge rise in the defence expenditure of the
Government of India. Taxes on individual incomes and business profits
were increased. During the war, Indian industries expanded and Indian
business groups began to demand greater opportunities for development.
The war also demanded the expansion of the British army. In 1917 there
was a revolution in Russia.

The advent of Mahatma Gandhi


Mahatma Gandhi emerged as a mass leader. He arrived in India in 1915
from South Africa. Gandhi led Indians in non-violent marches against
racist restrictions. His South African campaigns had brought him in
contact with various types of Indians. He spent his first year travelling
throughout the country, understanding the people, their needs and the
overall situation.

The Rowlatt Satyagraha


In 1919 Gandhiji called for satyagraha against the Rowlatt Act. The Act
curbed fundamental rights such as freedom of expression and
strengthened police powers. Gandhiji and the people of India observed 6
April 1919 as a day of non-violent opposition to this Act. Satyagraha
Sabhas were set up to launch the movement.

In April 1919, there were a number of demonstrations and hartals in the


country, and the government used brutal measures to suppress them. The
Jallianwala Bagh atrocities, inflicted by General Dyer in Amritsar on
Baisakhi day (13 April), were a part of this repression.

During the Rowlatt Satyagraha, the participants ensured that Hindus and
Muslims were united against British rule. Mahatma Gandhi saw India as a
land of all the people who lived in the country – Hindus, Muslims and
those of other religions.

Khilafat agitation and the Non-Cooperation Movement


In 1920 the British imposed a harsh treaty on the Turkish Sultan or
Khalifa. The leaders of the Khilafat agitation, Mohammad Ali and Shaukat
Ali, initiated a full-fledged Non-Cooperation Movement. Gandhiji supported
their movement and urged the Congress to campaign against the
Jallianwala massacre, the Khilafat was wrong and demanded swaraj.

The Non-Cooperation Movement gained momentum through 1921-22.C.


British titles were surrendered, and boycotted the legislature. The imports
of foreign cloth fell drastically between 1920 and 1922. Large parts of the
country were on the brink of a formidable revolt.

People’s initiatives
Some people resisted British rule non-violently. People from different
classes and groups interpreted Gandhiji’s call in their own manner, and
protested in ways that were not in accordance with his ideas. In some
cases, people linked their movements to local grievances.

In Kheda, Gujarat, Patidar peasants organised nonviolent campaigns


against the high land revenue demand of the British. In coastal Andhra
and interior Tamil Nadu, liquor shops were picketed. In the Guntur district
of Andhra Pradesh, tribals and poor peasants staged a number of “forest
satyagrahas”, sometimes sending their cattle into forests without paying
grazing fees.

In Sind, Muslim traders and peasants were very enthusiastic about the
Khilafat call. In Bengal, the Khilafat-Non-Cooperation alliance gave
enormous communal unity and strength to the national movement. In
Punjab, the Akali agitation of the Sikhs sought to remove corrupt mahants
from their gurdwaras.

The people’s Mahatma


Gandhiji believed in building class unity, not class conflict. Peasants
believed that Gandhi would help them in their fight against zamindars,
and agricultural labourers believed he would provide them with land. At
the end of a powerful movement, peasants of Pratapgarh in the United
Provinces managed to stop the illegal eviction of tenants; but they felt it
was Gandhiji who had won this demand for them.

The happenings of 1922-1929


Mahatma Gandhi called off the Non-Cooperation Movement. When the
Non-Cooperation movement was over, Gandhi’s followers stressed that
Congress must undertake constructive work in rural areas. Other leaders
argued that the party should fight elections to the councils. In 1930, the
Civil Disobedience Movement was launched. Two important developments
of the mid-1920s were the formation of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak
Sangh (RSS), a Hindu organisation, and the Communist Party of India. By
the end of the decade, Congress resolved to fight for Purna Swaraj in 1929
under the presidentship of Jawaharlal Nehru. Consequently,
“Independence Day ” was observed on 26 January 1930 all over the
country.

The March to Dandi


In 1930, Gandhiji marched to break the salt law. According to this law, the
state had a monopoly on the manufacture and sale of salt. The Salt March
related the general desire for freedom to a specific grievance shared by
everybody and, thus, did not divide the rich and the poor. Gandhiji and his
followers marched for over 240 miles from Sabarmati to the coastal town
of Dandi, where they broke the government law by gathering natural salt
found on the seashore and boiling seawater to produce salt.

Peasants, tribals and women participated in large numbers. The


Government of India Act of 1935 prescribed provincial autonomy, and the
government announced elections to the provincial legislatures in 1937. In
September 1939, the Second World War broke out. Congress leaders were
ready to support the British war effort, but in return, they demanded
independence. The British refused to concede the demand, and the
Congress ministries resigned in protest.

Quit India and Later


Mahatma Gandhi initiated a new phase of movement against the British.
He wanted the British to quit India immediately. To the people, he said,
“Do or Die” in your effort to fight the British, but non-violently. The
movement attracted peasants and the youth who gave up their studies to
join it. In many areas, people set up their own governments. The first
response of the British was severe repression. The rebellion ultimately
brought the Raj to its knees.

Towards Independence and Partition


In 1940 the Muslim League demanded “Independent States” for Muslims.
From the late 1930s, the League began viewing the Muslims as a separate
“nation” from the Hindus. The provincial elections of 1937 convinced the
League that Muslims were a minority and that they would always have to
play second fiddle in any democratic structure. The Congress’s rejection
of the League’s desire to form a joint Congress League government in the
United Provinces in 1937 also annoyed the League.

At the end of the war in 1945, the British opened negotiations between
the Congress, the League and themselves for the independence of India.
In 1946, elections to the provinces were held again. The League
demanded for Pakistan. In March 1946, the British cabinet sent a three-
member mission to Delhi to examine and suggest a suitable political
framework for a free India. This mission suggested that India should
remain united and constitute itself as a loose confederation with some
autonomy for Muslim-majority areas.

After the failure of the Cabinet Mission, the Muslim League decided on
mass agitation to win its Pakistan demand. It was announced on 16
August 1946 as “Direct Action Day”. By March 1947, violence spread to
different parts of northern India. Partition meant that India changed, many
of its cities changed, and a new country Pakistan was born.

You might also like