ACMM Chapter 3,4 and 5 Notes
ACMM Chapter 3,4 and 5 Notes
Regulatory documents
Federal aviation regulations (FARs): - In the United States, Federal laws are collected
into a document known as the code of federal regulations or CFRs. Those laws related to
commercial aviation are under title 14 of this code, aeronautics and space, parts 1 through
200.
Advisory circulars (ACs): - An advisory circular is a document issued by the FAA to
provide assistance to operators on meeting the requirements of various FARs. These ACs
are not binding as law but are merely suggestions as to how to comply with other
requirements. An AC often states that it is “a means, but not the only means” of complying
with a regulation.
Airworthiness directives (ADs): - The airworthiness directives are substantial regulations
issued by the FAA to correct an unsafe condition that exists in a product (aircraft, aircraft
engine, propeller, or appliance) and a condition that is likely to exist or develop in other,
similar products An AD, whose incorporation is mandatory, may be issued initially by the
FAA when an unsafe condition is noted or it may result from FAA action after the airframe
manufacturer has issued a service bulletin (SB) relative to some noted problem.
Incorporation of an SB is optional but, if it is made into an AD by the FAA, incorporation
becomes a mandatory requirement.
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM): - The NPRM is an FAA process that indicates
the intent to change or amend an existing Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR). This
provides an advance notice and invites public comment on proposed rules, which includes
holding public hearings or specific activities, rendering a decision, and issuing a new rule,
directive, or requirement in the form of an FAR.
Airline-Generated Documentation
Operations specifications: - The operations specifications (Ops Specs) document has
been discussed in Chap. 4 as an FAA requirement for airline certification. It is written by
the airline in accordance with strict FAA requirements and usually with the help of an FAA
representative. The Ops Specs is required for each aircraft type flown by the airline. It is a
parent document, which refers to numerous other documents to avoid duplication and
details the airline’s maintenance, inspection, and operations programs.
Technical policies and procedures manual (TPPM): - The TPPM3 is the primary
document for the airline’s M&E operation and, with other documents supplied by the
airframe manufacturer, serves as the FAA requirement for a maintenance manual per AC
120-16E. It is usually written by engineering, to ensure technical accuracy, from inputs
supplied by management of the various M&E organizations. It should define exactly how
all M&E functions and activities will be carried out. The TPPM is a detailed document and
may be several volumes. Personnel in all units of M&E must be trained on the TPPM,
especially those parts that relate directly to that unit’s operation, so that the operation will
go smoothly.
Inspection manual (IM): - The IM may be a separate document distributed primarily to
QC personnel, or it can be a chapter in the TPPM (usual approach).4 Contents of the IM
relate to all inspection activities within M&E: (a) mechanic inspection tasks from the
MPD/OAMP or the MRB report; (b) QC inspector’s tasks; (c) special inspections (hard
landings, bird strikes, etc.); (d) the airline’s required inspection item (RII) program; and
(e) the paperwork, forms, and reports required to carry out these functions.
Quality assurance (QA) manual: - The QA manual could be a special manual for QA
auditors only, it could be part of the inspection manual, or it could be a separate chapter in
the TPPM as desired. The QA manual defines the duties and responsibilities of the QA
organization and defines the processes and procedures used in the annual quality assurance
audits conducted on the M&E units, suppliers, and outside contractors. Forms used and
reports are also covered along with the procedures for follow-up and enforcement of QA
write-ups.
Reliability program manual: - An airline’s reliability program, under FAA rules, must
be approved by the regulatory authority, so it is usually published as a separate document.
This document defines the reliability program in detail so that the FAA can evaluate and
approve all its elements at one time.
Minimum equipment list (MEL): - The MMEL provided by the aircraft airframe
manufacturer includes all equipment and aircraft configuration information available for
the model to which it applies. The airlines pick and choose from the MMEL system the
type of MEL they would rather have due to specifications, weight variants, options
installed, software and hardware upgrades, retrofit status, engines, and airframe
configuration, which later in the airline’s version becomes an MEL. The MEL cannot be
less restrictive than the MMEL
Task cards: - Much of the work done at an airline during an aircraft check, however,
involves the combination of several tasks to be performed by the same mechanic or crew
within the same area or on the same equipment. To avoid unnecessary duplication of certain
actions, and the unnecessary opening and closing of the same panels, etc., most airlines
write their own task cards to spell out exactly what to do, using the manufacturer’s cards
as a guide. This eliminates the duplicated or wasted efforts
Engineering orders (EO): - Any maintenance work not covered in the standard
maintenance plan developed by engineering from the MRB report or Ops Specs data must
be made official by the issuance of an EO. This is official paper work, issued by
engineering and approved by QA, and is usually implemented through the production
planning and control (PP&C) organization
Line maintenance people for most airlines, especially those doing contract maintenance for other
carriers, will have the opportunity to work on a wide variety of aircraft during the course of their
shift or work week. Since aircraft manufacturers are independent, they each (in the past) had their
own way of doing things. This meant that their maintenance manuals were as different as their
aircraft (or perhaps more so). To reduce confusion on the line, the ATA stepped in and standardized
the overall format of the maintenance manuals so that all manufacturers’ documents would be
more compatible.
The Maintenance and Engineering Organization: - The organizational structure must
allow the company to meet its goals and objectives and each unit within the company must
be endowed with sufficient personnel and authority to carry out those objectives and meet
those goals. The structure for an effective maintenance and engineering organization will
vary with the size and type of organization. It may also vary with the management
philosophy of the company. But one thing must be kept in mind: the organizational
structure must allow the company to meet its goals and objectives and each unit within the
company must be endowed with sufficient personnel and authority to carry out those
objectives and meet those goals.
Organizational Structure The basic organizational structure for our midsized airline is
shown in Fig. 7-1. There are three basic concepts underlying the structure we have defined.
Two of these come from traditional management thinking. These are the concepts of span
of control and the grouping of similar functions. The third concept is somewhat unique to
aviation: the separation of production activities (maintenance and engineering) from the
oversight functions of inspection, control, and monitoring (quality assurance, quality
control, reliability, and safety).
Vice president of maintenance and engineering:- The head of the entire maintenance and
engineering function within the airline should be at a relatively high level of the airline’s structure.
He or she should be directly under the head of the airline or under the head of the company’s
operational activity (President, Chief Operating Officer, or whatever title is used). The VP of M&E
position should also be at the same level as the head of flight operations (VP Flight Ops or whatever
he or she is called). Flight operations and maintenance are considered to be two sides of the same
coin; they complement each other and carry equal weight
Directors of major functions The five major functions shown in Fig. 7-1 are, in the order
addressed in this book, technical services (which includes engineering, planning, training,
technical publications, and computing); aircraft maintenance (flight line, hangar, outstations, and
the maintenance control center); overhaul shops (for off-aircraft maintenance, repair, and
overhaul); material services (responsible for ordering and maintaining supplies, handling
warranties, and moving repairable and consumable parts through the system); and maintenance
program evaluation (the monitoring activity for the organization, its workers and its suppliers)
Managers and supervisors: - Within each directorate, there are several managers. Each of these
managers has a specialized area of responsibility within the overall scope of the directorate’s
function. Specific activities within each manager’s area of responsibility require staffs of
specialists with supervision by knowledgeable people.
Engineering The manager of engineering is responsible for all engineering functions within the
M&E organization. This includes (a) the development of the initial maintenance program (tasks,
intervals, schedules, blocking, etc.); (b) the evaluation of service bulletins (SBs) and service letters
(SLs) for possible inclusion into the airline’s equipment; (c) oversight of the incorporation of those
SBs and SLs that they deem beneficial; (d) overseeing the incorporation of airworthiness directives
(ADs), the modifications that are required by the regulatory authority; (e) the evaluation of
maintenance problems determined by the reliability program and for problems (if any) resulting
from the maintenance checks performed by maintenance; and (f) for establishing the policies and
procedures for the M&E organization.
Production planning and control The manager of production planning and control (PP&C) is
responsible for maintenance scheduling and planning. This function must plan and schedule the
manpower, parts, facilities, tools, and any special assistance required for all maintenance or
modification activities. Included in the functions of PP&C are the following: (a) all planning
activities related to maintenance and engineering (short, medium, and long term); (b) the
establishment of standards for manhours, material, facilities, tools, and equipment; (c) work
scheduling; (d) control of hangars; (e) on-airplane maintenance; and (f) monitoring of work
progress in the support shops.
Training The manager of technical training is responsible for curriculum, course development,
administration, and training records for all formal training attended by the M&E unit’s employees.
The organization coordinates any training required outside the unit (vendor training) and
coordinates with line and hangar maintenance personnel for the development of on-the-job training
and remedial or one-time training activities.
Technical publications The manager of technical publications is responsible for all technical
publications used by the M&E organization. The technical publications (Tech Pubs) keeps a
current list of all documents received from manufacturers and vendors, as well as those produced
in-house by the airline. Also on record are the number of copies, in paper, microfilm, or compact
disc (CD) format, that each work center should receive.
Computing services The manager of computing services is responsible for the definition of the
M&E organization’s computing requirements: (a) selection of software and hardware to be used,
with usage information and requirements inputs from the individual units; (b) training of
maintenance, inspection, and management personnel on computer usage; and (c) provide
continuing support to the using organizations.
Maintenance Directorate The aircraft maintenance directorate has responsibility for the major
aircraft maintenance activities: maintenance on the flight line and maintenance performed in the
hangar. Three managers report to the director of airplane maintenance: one for each of these
activities and one for MCC.
Hangar maintenance The manager of hangar maintenance is responsible for compliance with the
airline’s policies and procedures relative to all work done on the aircraft in the hangar, such as
modifications, engine changes, “C” checks (and higher), corrosion control, painting, etc. The
hangar maintenance function also includes various support shops (welding, seat and interior fabric,
composites, etc.), as well as ground support equipment.
Line maintenance The manager of line maintenance is responsible for compliance with the
airline’s policies and procedures relative to the work done on the aircraft on the flight line while
the aircraft is in service. Such activities include turnaround maintenance and servicing, daily
checks, short interval checks (less than “A” check interval), and “A” checks. Sometimes, simple
modifications can be done by line maintenance in order to avoid unnecessary use of the hangar.
Line maintenance may also be utilized to perform line maintenance activities for other airlines
under contract.
Maintenance control center The function known as the maintenance control center (MCC) keeps
track of all aircraft in flight and at outstations. All maintenance needs of these vehicles are
coordinated through the MCC. The MCC also coordinates downtime and schedule changes with
the flight department. Some airlines might have a supervisor of line stations to coordinate
outstation activities, but he or she is often part of the home base MCC operation.
Shops Directorate The overhaul shops directorate consists of those maintenance shops that
perform maintenance on items removed from the aircraft. These shops include engine shop(s),
electrical shop, electronics (or avionics) shop, and various mechanical shops. These may be
separate shops or some may be combined for convenience, depending on the operation. Some of
these shops may also perform contract work for other airlines.
Engine shops The manager of the engine overhaul shops is responsible for all maintenance and
repair done on the organization’s engines and auxiliary power units (APUs). If more than one type
engine is used, there may be a separate engine shop for each type performing the work, but these
would usually be under one senior manager with a supervisor for each engine type. The engine
build up activities would generally come under the engine shop manager.
Electrical and electronics (avionics) shops The manager of electrical/electronics shops is
responsible for all off-aircraft maintenance of electrical and electronics components and systems.
There are a variety of components and systems in this field with wide variations in the equipment
and in the skills needed to address them.
Mechanical component shops The manager of mechanical component shops has responsibilities
similar to those of the manager of avionics shops. The only difference, of course, is that these
shops would address mechanical components: actuators, hydraulic systems and components,
aircraft surfaces (flaps, slats, spoilers), fuel systems, oxygen, pneumatics, etc.
Structures The structures shop is responsible for maintenance and repair of all aircraft structural
components. This includes composite material as well as sheet metal and other structural elements
Purchasing The manager of purchasing is responsible for buying parts and supplies and tracking
these orders through the system. This begins with the initial issue of parts when a new aircraft is
added to the fleet and a continual replenishment of those parts based on usage. The purchasing unit
is also responsible for handling warranty claims and contract repairs.
Stores The manager of stores takes responsibility for the storage, handling, and distribution of
parts and supplies used by the maintenance personnel in line, hangar, and shop maintenance
activities. Stores areas, or parts issue points, are placed near the various work centers to allow
mechanics quick access to parts and supplies and to minimize the time spent obtaining those parts
and supplies
Inventory control The manager of inventory control is responsible for ensuring that the parts and
supplies on hand are sufficient for the normal, expected usage rate without tying up excessive
funds in nonmoving items and without running out of stock too soon or too often for commonly
used items
Shipping and receiving The manager of shipping and receiving is responsible for packing,
waybill preparation, insurance, customs, etc. for outgoing materials, as well as customs clearance,
unpacking, receiving inspection, tagging, etc. for incoming materials. This includes all parts being
shipped into and out of the airline.
Quality assurance The manager of quality assurance is responsible for assuring that all units of
M&E adhere to the company policies and procedures as well as FAA requirements. The manager
of QA sets the standards for the M&E operation, and the QA auditors ensure compliance to those
standards through yearly audits. Quality assurance is also responsible for auditing outside suppliers
and contractors for compliance with the company’s, as well as the regulatory authority’s, rules and
regulations.
Quality control The manager of quality control is responsible for conducting routine inspections
of maintenance and repair work, certifying maintenance and inspection personnel, and
management of the required inspection items (RIIs) program. This latter function involves the
identification of RIIs and the certification of specific personnel authorized to inspect and accept
the work. The QC organization is also responsible for the calibration of maintenance tools and test
equipment and performs or oversees the nondestructive testing and inspection (NDT/NDI)
procedures.
Reliability The manager of reliability is responsible for conducting the organization’s reliability
program and ensuring that any problem areas are promptly addressed. This responsibility includes
data collection and analysis, identification of possible problem areas (which are then addressed in
detail by engineering), and publication of the monthly reliability report
Safety The safety organization is responsible for developing, implementing, and administering the
safety- and health-related activities within the M&E organization. The safety manager is also
responsible for handling all reports and claims regarding M&E safety issues.
CHAPTER-4
Maintenance Control Center
The definition of management in any industry is “people who are hired to seek corporation’s
interest and administer the organization’s activities.” We will define management in an aviation
business organization as “an act of getting people together to accomplish the desired goals and
objectives in aircraft maintenance.” Aviation organizations, such as commercial, commuter, and
charter airlines, need a management team to be successful. In addition, fixed-base operators and
aircraft repair stations also need managers and, depending on their size, a streamlined, multiple-
layer approach that may include senior, middle, and supervisory management and different levels
of staff for management support
Role of Management/Manager in Aviation
Line maintenance
Line maintenance : - An aircraft may or may not experience any faults or discrepancies
during the flight. When the aircraft arrives at the gate, normal services (fuel, food, etc.)
will be provided, as well as the exchange of passengers, their baggage, and any cargo. If a
failure or discrepancy did occur in flight, there are two possible scenarios. Normally the
problem is written up in the aircraft maintenance logbook and addressed by the ground
crew upon flight arrival. Maintenance actions would be as indicated by the center column
blocks of Fig. 13-2. To minimize delay on the ground, however, it is recommended that
advance warning be given to the maintenance personnel by the flight crew through flight
operations and the MCC. This allows maintenance to spend time before the aircraft arrives
to review past records and troubleshoot the problem. Thus, the actions shown in the left
hand column of Fig. 13-2 are employed. In many cases, the maintenance crew can meet
the aircraft with a solution in hand thus minimizing maintenance downtime and delays.
This may be accomplished by a separate team or the same team that handles any other
logbook items. Note that both sign-off of all discrepancies (or deferrals) and servicing of
the aircraft must be completed prior to returning the aircraft to flight service.
Aircraft logbook: - The aircraft logbook is a type of document that is required by the FAA
and the airline to document any maintenance discrepancies. An aircraft cannot fly to any
destination without its logbook neither can an aircraft be taxied to any other location
without having the logbook on board. The logbook shows if there are any open
maintenance discrepancies, and if by moving or starting an aircraft, someone may damage
the aircraft or its systems. The aircraft maintenance department is responsible for keeping
the logbook up to date, which includes recording of such information as total flight hours
and cycles when fixing an aircraft’s maintenance discrepancy. The pilot in command must
write such basic information as the names of the flight crew and the flight number, and
must sign the logbook accepting the aircraft. The logbook contains a section that allows
the flight crew to write any maintenance discrepancies found during the preflight check,
encounter any maintenance problems while in the air, or discovered during the postflight
check. The flight crew must write the maintenance discrepancy in the logbook and notify
the MCC, so maintenance personnel can address the problem. Depending on the
maintenance discrepancy, it may be fixed quickly or it may be deferred under the MEL
program. When maintenance is completed on the aircraft and the discrepancy is signed off,
the AMT will remove the log page copy and forward it to the MCC. Some airlines collect
log copies at the end of each flight day. The logbook pages are normally duplicate copies
but may be in triplicate.
The modern aircraft have superseded or have improved the logbook with electronic
logbook. The ACARS (ARINC communication and reporting system) is used to transmit
data to the airline home base. The ACARS system is a digital datalink used by the flight
crew to transmit messages between the aircraft and the maintenance base while in flight.
This helps the MCC to evaluate discrepancies and the time needed for repairs. The ACARS
system is also used to sign off maintenance discrepancy (used as an electronic logbook)
depending on the aircraft used and its capabilities.
Ramp and terminal operations: - Transiting aircraft are the subject of a lot of attention
at any airport, and that attention is usually concentrated in a short (often 30-minute) time
span called the turnaround. During this turnaround, flight handling, servicing, and
maintenance chores must be accomplished. Although not all these actions would be
required at every turnaround, the following sections provide an overview of what might be
done.
Flight handling : - The main purpose of flight handling is to move passengers,
their baggage, and/or any carried cargo off and on the aircraft as necessary. This
begins with parking the aircraft at the gate and positioning the air stairs or the
gateway ramp and opening the aircraft doors. This is a joint effort involving
maintenance, ground handling crews, the flight and cabin crews, airline terminal
personnel, and the FAA tower personnel responsible for ground control. Watching
this activity from the passenger lounge, one sees a well-coordinated ballet of
workers and machines
Flight line: - The preflight inspection must be accomplished on the aircraft’s first
flight of the day. Preflight normally contains the recommended sequence and
expanded procedures. The preflight inspection is normally accomplished by the
first officer (copilot) and does not require the presence of both crew members.
Some of them are: -
Exterior safety
Exterior preflight inspection
Cabin safety inspection
Flight deck equipment location
Flight deck safety scan
Other line maintenance: - After the excitement, fervor, and expedience of the
turnaround effort has sub sided, the line maintenance organization attends to numerous
other tasks. One of these is the performance of the daily or 48-hour check (see Chap. 2) on
all assigned aircraft. These checks are usually done before the first flight each day
(overnight or morning). The daily or 48-hour check consists of specific items outlined in
the maintenance program identified in the unit’s Ops Specs. The airline may add other
items as necessary. Table 13-1 shows a typical 48-hour check for a twin-engine jet; Table
13-2 is a typical transit check for the same airplane
Line station activities: - Two terms have been used, somewhat interchangeably, in
reference to maintenance activities at stations that are not the home base of the airline.
These terms are line station and outstation. These terms are usually considered
synonymous. For the most part, line station activity is a smaller version of the home station
activity. The same type of activities take place relative to transiting aircraft. However, the
line station may have limited personnel and skills; limited availability of parts and supplies;
and limited facilities (stands, hangar space, GSE) for the performance of maintenance.
Hanger Management
Hangar maintenance, whether or not the airline actually has a hangar for such activity, refers to
that maintenance which is done on an out-of-service (OTS) aircraft. This includes any major
maintenance or modification on aircraft that have been temporarily removed from the flight
schedule, usually for that express purpose. The following types of activities are addressed in
hangar maintenance:
1. Schedule checks (“C” check, “D” check, heavy maintenance visit)
2. Modification of aircraft airframe or aircraft systems according to service bulletins, airworthiness
directives, or engineering orders
3. Fleet campaign directives
4. Aircraft engine removal and installation
5. Aircraft painting
6. Aircraft interior modifications
7. Special inspection required by the FAA (i.e., corrosion program)
Organization of Hanger maintenance
Hangar maintenance is a manager-level position under the director of aircraft maintenance (DOM).
Under the DOM is a typical organizational structure with managerial and supervisory positions:
aircraft maintenance, GSE, facilities, and support shops.
The supervisor of aircraft maintenance is responsible for all the hangar maintenance activities. He
or she controls the flow of aircraft into and out of the check, as well as the maintenance crews
working the checks.
The supervisor of aircraft maintenance coordinates with the overhaul and support shops, materials,
production planning and control, flight line maintenance, and flight operations regarding the
aircraft in the hangar.
The supervisor of GSE and facilities are responsible for all ground support equipment used to
support the hangar maintenance personnel, as well as the flight line maintenance activity and the
building and facilities used by maintenance.
The supervisor of support shops is responsible for all support activities for aircraft service and
maintenance that is not designated as overhaul shops.
The support shops include those in support of welding, composite material, sheet metal,
upholstery, seats, and interiors
Outsourcing of Shop Maintenance” - Work As with line and hangar maintenance, some or all of
the shop maintenance at a given airline can be outsourced to other airlines or to third-party
maintenance organizations. In the case of partial outsourcing, the director of overhaul shops is
responsible for coordinating these activities into the overall airline maintenance plan. If all shop
maintenance is done by outside contractors, the overhaul shops directorate would not exist at the
airline.
CHAPTER -5
Quality Assurance and Control
The inspection function of an airline M&E organization is part of the basic maintenance program
established by the Ops Specs as discussed. It consists, in part, of inspections performed by the
mechanics during routine maintenance work: general visual inspections, detailed inspections, as
well as the obvious checking and rechecking of one’s own work. Some maintenance actions
require a “second pair of eyes” to perform an inspection to ensure that the work was performed
correctly or to double-check the work. This includes the required inspection items (RIIs) and also
includes oversight checking of newly hired or newly trained personnel to ensure they are
performing up to standards. Still another type of inspection, the conditional inspection, is required
for special events, such as bird strikes, hard landings, lightning strikes, flights through heavy
turbulence, or the accidental dragging of wing tips or engine pods upon landing or taxiing. For
these special events, the inspection must be detailed enough to detect possible structural damage
and may require special nondestructive techniques for test and inspection (NDT/NDI). For a
mechanic to carry out RIIs or con duct conditional inspections, he or she must be properly trained,
qualified, and approved to do said inspections by quality assurance as per FAR 121.371.
Certain other types of audits can be performed either on a yearly or on an as necessary basis. These
are audits of certain processes, procedures, or functions, which may span two or more
organizations or activities within M&E. Each organization involved would be audited for their part
in the larger process, procedure, or function without a full audit of their organization (unless that
is deemed necessary due to these or other findings). These audits include the following:
1. Ramp operations. All line maintenance and support functions related to activities in the airport
ramp and gate areas. This would include parking, taxiing, refueling, aircraft servicing, loading and
unloading (passengers, cargo, etc.), and turnaround maintenance. Such an audit might be
performed in conjunction with a problem concerning delays and cancellations or with terminal
operations in general.
2. Airplane tire pressures. The process for checking and adjusting tire pressures (inspection
techniques, use of nitrogen, etc.) throughout the fleet might be audited. This would include all
model aircraft, all stations where such work is likely to be done, and the crews involved.
3. Shop records. Although this subject would normally be part of a standard audit for any unit
where records are kept, situations may arise that require an audit of the record keeping process
airline-wide. New procedures, new computer processes, or reliability program findings, for
example, could necessitate such an audit.
4. Required inspection items (RIIs). Again, this would be included in the standard audit each
time any unit involved with RIIs is audited. But it may be necessary to check the RII process itself,
as well as to review the authorization of those mechanics performing RIIs.
5. AD and SB compliance. All ADs are required to be implemented within some specified time
limit and often apply to specific aircraft (by tail number, model, or dash number, etc.). Service
bulletins, although optional, must be reviewed for proper compliance if incorporated. Sometimes
an AD is generated for an already released SB. Even if the airline rejected the SB (for whatever
reason) as an AD it must be incorporated. This audit would look at engineering for the handling
of ADs and SBs and the subsequent generation of EOs and other work orders; it will also look at
appropriate units involved in the incorporation of these modifications (maintenance, material,
training, etc.).
6. Major repairs and alterations. These audits are usually performed to ensure compliance with
requirements whenever major aircraft repairs or alterations are done. These modifications would
be performed on a fleet of aircraft, but the audit would normally be done only once.
7. Safety equipment. Availability and accessibility of safety equipment in the various work
centers may be part of the center’s normal audit, but a special audit of all safety equipment may
be desirable at times. This may include an audit of the safety organization itself.
8. Safety training. Training in the location and use of safety items and the proper employment of
safety measures is also done in conjunction with work center audits, but again, a special audit of
the entire safety program may be in order.
9. Accident/incident reporting. These processes and procedures would be addressed in an audit
of the safety organization, but an audit may be necessary of the total program, including other
work centers.
10. Fire protection/prevention. All systems, equipment, and procedures related to fire protection
and fire prevention may be the subject of a onetime audit.
11. Hazardous materials handling. The proper handling of these materials requires training of
personnel who have contact with such materials. The overall program, spanning several work
centers, may be audited.
Functions of QA
The portion of QA that handles records may also be responsible for monitoring the
currency of mechanics’ licenses and inspectors’ qualifications and authorizations (RIIs and
conditional inspections).
This group would also have administrative control over the development and modification
of the TPPM and other documents requiring approval from the director of MPE.
The QA also performs in-house audit and spot checks that are frequently accomplished on
various shifts to get an idea of how well the company’s maintenance policies and
procedures are being followed.
These spot checks may be of aircraft being maintained at hangar, line maintenance, safety,
maintenance shops, paperwork, tooling, or equipment being used.
Reliability
Reliability equals consistency. It can be defined as the probability that an item will perform a
required function, under specified conditions without failure, for a specified amount of time
according to its intended design.
The reliability program is a valuable means of achieving better operational performance in an
aircraft maintenance environment, and it is designed to decrease maintenance related issues and
increase flight safety. The intent of this program is to deal systematically with problems as they
arise instead of trying to cure immediate symptoms. There are two main approaches to the concept
of reliability in the aviation industry.
The first approach is to look at the overall airline reliability. This is measured essentially by
dispatch reliability; that is, by how often the airline achieves an on-time departure1 of its scheduled
flights. Airlines using this approach track delays. Reasons for the delay are categorized as
maintenance, flight operations, air traffic control (ATC), etc. and are logged accordingly. The
M&E organization is concerned only with those delays caused by maintenance.
The second approach (which we should actually call the primary approach) is to consider reliability
as a program specifically designed to address the problems of maintenance—whether or not they
cause delays—and provide analysis of and corrective actions for those items to improve the overall
reliability of the equipment. This contributes to the dispatch reliability, as well as to the overall
operation
Types of Reliability
Statistical reliability:- Statistical reliability is based upon collection and analysis
of failure, removal, and repair rates of systems or components. From this point on,
we will refer to these various types of maintenance actions as “events.” Event rates
are calculated on the basis of events per 1000 flight hours or events per 100 flight
cycles. This normalizes the parameter for the purpose of analysis. Other rates may
be used as appropriate
Historical reliability: - Historical reliability is simply a comparison of current
event rates with those of past experience. Look at last year’s data for the same
equipment, same time period. Use the previous year’s data also, if available. If
current rates compare favorably with past experience, then everything is okay; if
there is a significant difference in the data from one year to the next, that would be
an indication of a possible problem. That is what a reliability program is all about:
detecting and subsequently resolving problems.
Historical reliability can also be used by airlines wishing to establish a statistically
based program. Data on event rates kept for 2 or 3 years can be tallied or plotted
graphically and analyzed to determine what the normal or acceptable rates would
be (assuming no significant problems were incurred). Guidelines can then be
established for use during the next year. This will be covered in more detail in the
reliability program section below.
Event-oriented reliability: - Event-oriented reliability is concerned with one-time
events such as bird strikes, hard landings, overweight landings, in-flight engine
shutdowns, lighting strikes, ground or flight interruption, and other accidents or
incidents. These are events that do not occur on a daily basis in airline operations
and, therefore, produce no usable statistical or historical data. Nevertheless, they
do occur from time to time, and each occurrence must be investigated to determine
the cause and to prevent or reduce the possibility of recurrence of the problem.
Dispatch reliability: - Dispatch reliability is a measure of the overall effectiveness
of the airline operation with respect to on-time departure. It receives considerable
attention from regulatory authorities, as well as from airlines and passengers, but it
is really just a special form of the event-oriented reliability approach. It is a simple
calculation based on 100 flights. This makes it convenient to relate dispatch rate in
percent. An example of the dispatch rate calculation follows.
A Reliability Program
A reliability program for our purposes is, essentially, a set of rules and practices for managing and
controlling a maintenance program. The main function of a reliability program is to monitor the
performance of the vehicles and their associated equipment and call attention to any need for
corrective action. The program has two additional functions: (a) to monitor the effectiveness of
those corrective actions and (b) to provide data to justify adjusting the maintenance intervals or
maintenance program procedures whenever those actions are appropriate.
The basic elements are
(a) Data collection: - The data collection process gives the reliability department the information
needed to observe the effectiveness of the maintenance program. Those items that are doing well
might be eliminated from the program simply because the data show that there are no problems.
On the other hand, items not being tracked may need to be added to the program because there are
serious problems related to those systems
(b) Problem area alerting, : - The data collection system allows the operator to compare present
performance with past performance in order to judge the effectiveness of maintenance and the
maintenance program. An alerting system should be in place to quickly identify those areas where
the performance is significantly different from normal. These are items that might need to be
investigated for possible problems. Standards for event rates are set according to analysis of past
performances and deviations from these standards.
(c) Data display; : - Several methods for displaying data are utilized by the reliability department
to study and analyze the data they collect. Most operators have personal computers available so
that data can easily be displayed in tabular and graphical forms. The data are presented as events
per 100 or 1000 flight hours or flight cycles. Some, such as delays and cancellations, are presented
as events per 100 departures. The value of 100 allows easy translation of the rate into a percentage.
(d) Data analysis; : - Whenever an item goes into alert status, the reliability department does a
preliminary analysis to determine if the alert is valid. If it is valid, a notice of the on-alert condition
is sent to engineering for a more detailed analysis. The engineering department is made up of
experienced people who know maintenance and engineering. Their job relative to these alerts is to
troubleshoot the problem, determine the required action that will correct the problem, and issue an
engineering order (EO) or other official paperwork that will put this solution in place
(e) Corrective actions; : - Corrective actions can vary from one-time efforts correcting a
deficiency in a procedure to the retraining of mechanics to changes in the basic maintenance
program. The investigation of these alert conditions commonly results in one or more of the
following actions: (a) modifications of equipment; (b) change in or correction to line, hangar, or
shop processes or practices; (c) disposal of defective parts (or their suppliers); (d) training of
mechanics (refresher or upgrade); (e) addition of maintenance tasks to the program; or (f )
decreases in maintenance intervals for certain tasks
(f) Follow-up analysis: - The reliability department should follow up on all actions taken relative
to on-alert items to verify that the corrective action taken was indeed effective. This should be
reflected in decreased event rates. If the event rate does not improve after action has been taken,
the alert is reissued and the investigation and corrective action process is repeated, with
engineering taking a different approach to the problem. If the corrective action involves lengthy
modifications to numerous vehicles, the reduction in the event rate may not be noticeable for some
time
(g) A monthly report: - A reliability report is issued monthly. Some organizations issue quarterly
and yearly reports in summary format. The most useful report, however, is the monthly. This report
should not contain an excessive amount of data and graphs without a good explanation of what
this information means to the airline and to the reader of the report. The report should concentrate
on the items that have just gone on alert, those items under investigation, and those items that are
in or have completed the corrective action process.
Maintenance Safety
The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 29, Part 1910, deals with industrial safety (29 CFR 1910). Its title
is “Occupational Safety and Health Standards” and is part of the U.S. Government regulations for the
Department of Labor (DOL). The agency within DOL responsible for enforcing these regulations is the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Aviation is not addressed specifically in these
OSHA regulations, but all aspects of the aviation maintenance activity (as well as flight operations, office,
and terminal activities) are covered. Table 19-1 lists the subparts of Part 1910 as of January 2003. It is up
to the aviation industry itself to ferret out those parts and sub parts of 29 CFR 1910 that apply to aviation
matters and materials and to tailor the requirements directly to those airline activities.
Fire prevention Smoking materials are not the only sources of ignition for fires. Electrostatic
discharge can also provide the spark needed for ignition of flammable vapors and other substances.
For that reason, all aircraft should be properly grounded while they are in the hangar or on the
ramp, especially during refueling and defueling operations. Other materials susceptible to
combustion include rags and paper. Combustible rags must be stored in National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA)- approved, closed containers, and paper and other combustible trash must be
stored in suitable trash cans. Other items, such as volatile cleaning fluids with a low flash point,
oils, and paints, must also be properly stored and handled. When these items are present, the no
smoking rules will apply and adequate ventilation will be required.
Hangar deluge systems Airplane hangars are complex and expensive structures, and they often
contain one or more aircraft, which are considerably more expensive than the building itself. The
multitude of other equipment in the hangar, and the fact that air craft may be jacked up,
surrounded by scaffolding and maintenance stands, or in some other condition detrimental to
moving them readily, make it imperative that these hangars be equipped with sufficient fire
suppression equipment to protect the airline’s investment.
Fall prevention and protection The OSHA regulations concerning fall protection and prevention
refer to work surfaces, scaffolding, and other high and precarious places, such as building
construction sites, but not specifically the wings and fuselages of airplanes where maintenance
people have to go occasionally. However, the same philosophy exists. Dangerous areas must be
identified and should have specific equipment and procedures in place to protect anyone involved
in working these areas.