SUBHABRATA DHAR – Cell : 9330080100/ 7605807134

Topic: Aristotle's poetics:

Ans. Aristotle’s Poetics is one of the most influential works in Western literary theory and criticism. Written
around 335 BCE, it represents Aristotle's thoughts on various forms of art, particularly tragedy. Although
originally composed as part of a broader examination of poetry, only the portion dealing with tragedy and epic
poetry has survived. Despite its fragmentary nature, Poetics has had an enduring impact on how scholars,
playwrights, and critics have approached drama, literature, and storytelling.
Aristotle’s work seeks to understand the principles that govern successful literary compositions, particularly
tragic drama. Central to his analysis is the concept of mimesis, or imitation. Aristotle argues that all forms of
art are mimetic by nature; they imitate life in some form. This notion of mimesis differentiates between various
artistic mediums, including poetry, painting, and music, each imitating life through its particular tools—words,
color, or sound, respectively. Tragedy, as Aristotle sees it, is a form of poetry that imitates human action,
particularly actions that evoke pity and fear.
One of the key objectives of tragedy, according to Aristotle, is to bring about a catharsis of these emotions.
Catharsis, a term that has been much debated by scholars, refers to the emotional purging or cleansing that the
audience experiences through their engagement with the tragedy. By witnessing the events that unfold in a
tragic drama, the audience is supposed to feel pity for the characters' suffering and fear for what could happen
to them, and through this process, achieve a kind of emotional release or purification.
In his analysis, Aristotle distinguishes between different elements that make up a tragic drama. One of the
most significant is the plot, which he considers the "soul" of tragedy. According to Aristotle, a well-constructed
plot should have a beginning, middle, and end. It should be unified and coherent, with all events leading to a
logical conclusion. The plot should not be a random series of events, but rather a carefully organized sequence
where one event leads naturally to the next. Moreover, Aristotle asserts that the best tragic plots involve a
reversal of fortune (peripeteia) and recognition (anagnorisis). These are key moments in the narrative that
intensify the emotional impact of the drama. Peripeteia is the moment when the hero's fortunes change
dramatically, often from good to bad, while anagnorisis is the moment when the hero gains crucial insight,
usually about his own role in his downfall.
Another essential element of tragedy in Aristotle's view is character. While plot is of paramount importance,
the characters must also be well-drawn and believable. The protagonist of a tragedy is typically a person of
noble stature who, through some error or flaw (hamartia), brings about their own downfall. This flaw is not
necessarily a moral failing, but rather a mistake or misjudgment that sets the tragic events in motion.
Importantly, the tragic hero's downfall is not entirely deserved; there is an element of undeserved misfortune
that evokes pity in the audience. At the same time, the audience feels fear because the hero's error is something
that any human being could potentially make.
In addition to plot and character, Aristotle discusses other elements of tragedy such as thought, diction, melody,
and spectacle. Thought refers to the themes and ideas expressed in the tragedy, which should arise naturally
from the plot and characters. Diction pertains to the language and style of the play, which should be appropriate
to the characters and the nature of the drama. Melody, which relates to the musical aspects of the tragedy,
plays an important role in enhancing the emotional effect of the drama, while spectacle refers to the visual
elements of the performance, such as scenery and costumes. Aristotle considers spectacle to be the least
important element of tragedy, arguing that a well-constructed plot and strong characters can create emotional
impact even without elaborate visual effects.
Aristotle contrasts tragedy with epic poetry, another form of mimetic art. While both forms involve the
imitation of serious subjects and characters, they differ in several respects. Tragedy is performed in front of
an audience and usually unfolds within a single day, while epic poetry is typically a long, narrative poem that
 SUBHABRATA DHAR – Cell : 9330080100/ 7605807134
can cover a vast span of time. Additionally, the epic form allows for more digressions and episodes, whereas
tragedy must be tightly focused on a single, unified plot. Despite these differences, Aristotle maintains that
the principles governing both forms are fundamentally the same.
In Poetics, Aristotle also distinguishes between tragedy and comedy. Comedy, which Aristotle briefly
mentions, is seen as an imitation of characters who are inferior in some way, but the errors they make are not
destructive or harmful, leading to laughter rather than pity or fear. Unfortunately, Aristotle’s analysis of
comedy is largely lost, and what remains of Poetics focuses primarily on tragedy.
One of the key contributions of Aristotle’s Poetics is its emphasis on the internal logic of the narrative. For
Aristotle, the events in a tragedy must follow a necessary or probable sequence, meaning that one event should
logically follow from another. This idea of causality in storytelling, known as unity of action, has been a
significant influence on subsequent theories of drama and literature. It asserts that a successful narrative is not
merely a series of disconnected episodes, but rather a coherent and organic whole in which each part
contributes to the overall effect.
Aristotle’s Poetics was not widely studied during the Middle Ages, but it experienced a revival in the
Renaissance when scholars rediscovered many ancient Greek texts. Since then, it has become a foundational
text for literary theory, influencing playwrights, poets, and critics alike. Renaissance dramatists such as
William Shakespeare and later neoclassical playwrights like Pierre Corneille and Jean Racine were deeply
influenced by Aristotle’s principles, particularly his ideas about plot structure and the unity of action. In
modern times, Poetics continues to be a central text in discussions of narrative theory, drama, and film studies.
The lasting significance of Poetics lies in its systematic approach to understanding narrative and drama.
Aristotle’s method of breaking down a work of art into its constituent parts and analyzing how these parts
function together has shaped the way we think about storytelling. Even though some of Aristotle’s ideas, such
as the notion of catharsis or the primacy of plot over character, have been debated and challenged over the
centuries, his framework for understanding how narratives work remains a cornerstone of literary criticism.
In sum, Aristotle's Poetics offers a timeless exploration of the mechanics of tragedy, focusing on its ability to
evoke emotion and create meaning through structured, logical narratives. Although the work has been
interpreted and reinterpreted in various ways throughout history, its core ideas about mimesis, catharsis, plot,
and character continue to resonate in discussions of literature and drama, making it one of the most enduring
texts in the Western literary canon.
………. The End……….